Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Hybridization of evolutionary algorithm and deep reinforcement learning for multi-objective orienteering optimization

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2206.10464 v1 pith:SWG6EGFU submitted 2022-06-21 cs.NE

classification cs.NE
keywords multi-objectivemethodmo-opsalgorithmcitiesdeepevolutionaryinstances
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Multi-objective orienteering problems (MO-OPs) are classical multi-objective routing problems and have received a lot of attention in the past decades. This study seeks to solve MO-OPs through a problem-decomposition framework, that is, a MO-OP is decomposed into a multi-objective knapsack problem (MOKP) and a travelling salesman problem (TSP). The MOKP and TSP are then solved by a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) and a deep reinforcement learning (DRL) method, respectively. While the MOEA module is for selecting cities, the DRL module is for planning a Hamiltonian path for these cities. An iterative use of these two modules drives the population towards the Pareto front of MO-OPs. The effectiveness of the proposed method is compared against NSGA-II and NSGA-III on various types of MO-OP instances. Experimental results show that our method exhibits the best performance on almost all the test instances, and has shown strong generalization ability.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Incremental Optimal Assignment for Real-Time Crowd Tracking

    cs.CV 2026-07 conditional novelty 3.0 of 10

    An incremental assignment solver with warm-started dual potentials claims 1.1–6.5× speedups over Hungarian on synthetic block-sparse crowd matrices, with the headline 3.7–6.5× range not matching its own data.

Pith tools