Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 36 references

Fundamental limitations of thermoradiative energy conversion

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Conventional radiative heat engines always beat thermoradiative engines: at any given efficiency and temperature ratio, the hot-side configuration delivers less power, so thermoradiative cells are inherently less favorable for energy…

desk verdict Useful paper with a clear analytic core showing radiative engines dominate thermoradiative ones, but the practical no-benefit claim for reciprocal systems rests on a numerically fitted bound that is not proven to be an upper bound, plus a couple of concrete typos in the endoreversible section. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.19864 v1 pith:SXZW6PTP submitted 2025-07-26 physics.app-ph

Maxime Giteau , Michela F. Picardi , Georgia T. Papadakis This is my paper
classification physics.app-ph
keywords thermoradiativeenergyconversionpower-efficiencyboundsendoreversiblemodelreciprocalheatenginesnonreciprocalthermophotovoltaicsnighttimepowergenerationemitters
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper derives thermodynamic power-versus-efficiency bounds for thermoradiative heat engines — devices that generate electricity while radiating heat toward a cold sink such as deep space — and compares them, on a common footing, with conventional radiative engines that harvest radiation from a hot source. The authors' central claim is that radiative engines always outperform thermoradiative ones: for any given efficiency and temperature ratio $T_C/T_H$, the maximum power of the thermoradiative configuration is lower, and the gap widens as the temperature difference grows, with the two families converging only in the near-equilibrium limit. The results matter because thermoradiative cells are the proposed technology for nighttime power generation from Earth's thermal emission into space, and the bounds redirect that effort toward approaching the radiative endoreversible limit with thermophotovoltaic cells. For dual engines combining both configurations, the reciprocal optimum collapses to the purely radiative one, so adding a thermoradiative stage provides no performance benefit.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by three nested engine models plus the mapping between them. The endoreversible model is a blackbody at temperature $T_E$ coupled to a Carnot engine, giving $\rho_E = \left(\frac{T_E^4 - T_C^4}{T_H^4}\right)\left(\frac{T_H}{T_E} - 1\right)$ and $\eta_E = 1 - \frac{T_E}{T_H}$; it approximates the reciprocal bound, which is defined as the limit of an infinite set of spectrally independent blackbody-Carnot sub-engines, each converting its own photon-energy interval at a temperature $T_E(E)$ chosen to maximize power. The nonreciprocal bound assumes isentropic conversion through sub-engines coupled by nonreciprocal optical elements (optical circulators or Kirchhoff-law-breaking emitters), with power and entropy conservation giving $Q_H = \frac{4}{3}\sigma T_H (T_E^3 - T_C^3)$ and $W = Q_H - \sigma(T_E^4 - T_C^4)$, hence $\bar{\rho}_N \leq 1/3$ and $\bar{\eta}_N \leq 1/4$. The unifying identity is that thermoradiative formulas follow from the conventional radiative ones of the authors' earlier work [7] by swapping $T_H$ and $T_C$, with figures of merit $\rho = W/\sigma T_H^4$ and $\eta = W/Q_H$; on this common footing the nonreciprocal-to-reciprocal power ratio is at least two for any efficiency and temperature ratio.

What would settle it

Measure the complete power-versus-efficiency curve of a thermoradiative cell (for example, an HgCdTe photodiode or a rectenna emitting toward the cold sky) at a known $T_C/T_H$ and compare it with the paper's reciprocal bound, nonreciprocal bound, and the radiative endoreversible curve: any reciprocal device operating above the reciprocal bound, or any thermoradiative device delivering more power than a radiative engine at the same efficiency, would refute the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim, stated in Section V, is that for any given temperature ratio and efficiency, conventional radiative heat engines consistently yield higher power output than thermoradiative ones, making thermoradiative engines inherently less favorable for energy conversion. The argument runs through three nested models — an endoreversible engine (a blackbody at $T_E$ driving a Carnot engine), a reciprocal bound (an infinite set of spectrally independent blackbody-Carnot sub-engines at photon-energy-dependent temperatures $T_E(E)$), and a nonreciprocal bound (isentropic conversion by sub-engines coupled with optical circulators or emitters that break Kirchhoff's law) — each giving a closed-form power-efficiency relation. Near the Carnot limit the endoreversible thermoradiative power is half the nonreciprocal power, and the same ratio holds numerically between the reciprocal and nonreciprocal limits, so breaking reciprocity at least doubles the achievable power. Since a thermoradiative engine is a radiative engine with source and sink temperatures exchanged, all configurations can be compared in one framework, and the radiative curves lie uniformly above the thermoradiative ones; the absolute nonreciprocal thermoradiative limits are $\bar{\rho}_N \leq 1/3$ in normalized power at efficiency $\bar{\eta}_N \leq 1/4$, approached as $T_C/T_H \to 0$. For dual engines under reciprocity the optimal operating point has the hot-side engine at the source temperature, $T_L = T_H$, which coincides with the purely radiative endoreversible model, so reciprocal dual systems gain nothing from a thermoradiative stage; only nonreciprocal dual engines benefit, producing finite power even at Carnot efficiency.

Load-bearing premise

The conclusion that practical reciprocal thermoradiative cells cannot beat the radiative endoreversible limit rests on the assumption, stated in the Supplemental Material, that an optimal reciprocal converter is an infinite set of spectrally independent blackbody-Carnot sub-engines, each running at its own photon-energy-dependent temperature $T_E(E)$ — an idealization real devices may not satisfy.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • An ideal thermophotovoltaic cell always out-produces an ideal thermoradiative cell at the same efficiency and temperature ratio, and the power gap grows as $T_C/T_H$ decreases; only near equilibrium do the two limits converge.
  • Adding a thermoradiative (hot-side) engine to a reciprocal thermophotovoltaic engine yields no performance gain: the optimal dual reciprocal configuration is the purely radiative one with $T_L = T_H$, so all practical radiative engines are bounded by the radiative endoreversible model.
  • Breaking reciprocity is the one route to substantially more power: the nonreciprocal thermoradiative bound is at least twice the reciprocal one, and nonreciprocal dual engines can deliver finite power even at Carnot efficiency, with normalized power approaching $4/3$ as $T_C/T_H \to 0$.
  • For small temperature differences the radiative and thermoradiative limits converge to the same parabolic power-efficiency relations, consistent with experiments showing the two cell types performing similarly near equilibrium; the paper notes that in this regime thermoelectric devices are typically more suitable.
  • The bounds supply concrete reference numbers: radiation from the Earth at 300 K into 3 K space gives at most about $48~\mathrm{W\,m^{-2}}$ for the endoreversible model and $153~\mathrm{W\,m^{-2}}$ for the nonreciprocal bound, figures against which any proposed nighttime thermoradiative cell can be tested.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable consequence the paper leaves implicit: a reciprocal thermoradiative device measured at any efficiency should sit at or below the reciprocal bound (near the Carnot limit, about half the nonreciprocal curve); a device operating above it would show that real converters beat the spectral blackbody-Carnot decomposition, and the no-benefit conclusion would need revisiting.
  • Because the radiative-to-thermoradiative mapping is only a temperature swap, the same bounding method could be extended to chains with more than two thermal reservoirs; nothing in the two-reservoir analysis guarantees that an intermediate-temperature stage would also collapse to the purely radiative limit.
  • The factor-of-two ratio between nonreciprocal and reciprocal limits appears on both sides of the radiative-versus-thermoradiative comparison, so advances in Kirchhoff-law-breaking emitters would lift both configurations equally and would preserve the paper's ordering.
  • The natural benchmark in the small-temperature-difference regime, where the two radiative limits converge, is the thermoelectric generator; a quantitative bound-to-bound comparison between the radiative endoreversible curve and thermoelectric power-efficiency trade-offs would sharpen the paper's claim that thermoradiative cells lose their niche as the temperature difference shrinks.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper derives power-versus-efficiency bounds for thermoradiative heat engines in three models—endoreversible, reciprocal, and nonreciprocal—and compares them with conventional radiative engines, concluding that radiative engines always dominate thermoradiative engines at equal temperature ratio and efficiency, and that dual reciprocal systems provide no performance benefit. It also provides closed-form expressions for the nonreciprocal bound and discusses dual nonreciprocal engines that can produce finite power at Carnot efficiency.

Significance. If the bounds are correct, the paper provides a useful unified framework for radiative energy conversion and strong practical guidance: reciprocal thermoradiative cells would not be competitive with thermophotovoltaic cells, and nonreciprocity would be the only route to surpass the radiative endoreversible limit. The analytical endoreversible and nonreciprocal derivations are transparent, and the comparison for the endoreversible case is convincing. However, the reciprocal-bound construction is not proven to be an upper bound, and this is load-bearing for the paper's central and practical claims.

major comments (4)
  1. [III, Eq. (3)] The stated maximum-power condition for the endoreversible thermoradiative engine, 4 T_E^5 - 3 T_C T_E^4 - T_C T_H^4 = 0, is not the stationary condition for the power density in Eq. (3). Differentiating ρE = [(T_E^4 - T_C^4)/T_H^4] (T_H/T_E - 1) with respect to T_E gives 4 T_E^5 - 3 T_H T_E^4 - T_H T_C^4 = 0. The equation printed in the paper is the maximum-power condition for the conventional radiative endoreversible engine of Ref. [7]. This error affects the reported optimal engine temperature and needs correction.
  2. [Supplemental Material, 'RECIPROCAL BOUND'] The reciprocal bound is not actually established as an upper bound. The derivation assumes the optimal converter is an infinite set of spectrally independent blackbody-Carnot sub-engines with temperature profile T_E(E), and then maximizes power by fitting T_E(E) to a 7th-order polynomial. This produces a feasible family of profiles, but there is no proof that the true optimum lies in that polynomial family; for any fixed efficiency, the polynomial result is a lower bound on the true maximum, not an upper bound. The validation at the maximum-power point (matching the energy-by-energy optimization) does not cover other efficiencies. Consequently, statements in Section V that 'any reciprocal system is practically bounded by the endoreversible model for conventional radiative engines' and the general claim that radiative engines 'consistently yield higher power output than thermoradiative ones' are not rigorously supported for reciprocal systems unless the variational upper-bound property is proved or the claims are restricted.
  3. [IV and Supplemental Material, 'POWER RATIO'] The claim that the nonreciprocal power limit is always at least twice the reciprocal power limit is supported only by first-order expansions near the Carnot limit and by the sentence 'We observed numerically that this result also holds when considering the ratio between reciprocal and nonreciprocal limits.' This is numerical evidence, not a proof over the full range of efficiencies and temperature ratios. Since the paper states this as a general bound, an analytic inequality or a more rigorous numerical certification is needed.
  4. [V, dual engines] The extension of the no-benefit conclusion from the endoreversible dual model to the reciprocal bound is argued by a per-photon-energy analogy and by agreement with Fig. 3(d) of Ref. [3], rather than by a derivation. Because this extension underlies the practical conclusion that adding thermoradiative cells to reciprocal systems provides no advantage, it should be either proved or explicitly presented as a conjecture supported by numerical evidence.
minor comments (5)
  1. [III] The expression '33/44 ≈ 0.11' should read 3^3/4^4 = 27/256 ≈ 0.1055 to be unambiguous.
  2. [Supplemental Material, 'RECIPROCAL BOUND'] In the sentence 'we model T_E(E) as a polynomial and adjust its coefficients to minimize the power output,' 'minimize' should be 'maximize'.
  3. [Fig. 2] The axis labels contain corrupted characters ('E昀昀iciency', 'Power density / N'); they should be 'Efficiency / ηC' and 'Power density / ρ̄N' or an equivalent notation.
  4. [Supplemental Material, 'POWER RATIO'] The phrase 'We observed numerically' should be flagged as numerical evidence in the main text as well, since Section IV refers to the Supplemental Material as a justification for the factor-of-two claim.
  5. [Supplemental Material, 'RECIPROCAL BOUND'] The statement 'contrary to Ref. 1' is unexplained; the authors should clarify what is different from the approach in their prior radiative-engine paper.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the thermoradiative bounds are derived directly from endoreversible and nonreciprocal models, and the dominance comparison is a closed-form algebraic consequence, not an input.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained for its central claims. The endoreversible thermoradiative relations (Eqs. 3-4) and nonreciprocal relations (Eqs. 6-9) are derived from blackbody/Carnot power and entropy balance, not by fitting to the radiative-engine results of Ref. [7]. The comparison in Sec. V is an algebraic inequality between separately derived curves: for fixed efficiency, the radiative endoreversible power minus the thermoradiative power is manifestly nonnegative, so the claim that radiative engines always yield higher power is a mathematical consequence rather than an assumed input. The reciprocal bound is explicitly introduced as an assumption ('We assume the converter consists in an infinite set of blackbodies at temperature TE(E)') and optimized via a 7th-order polynomial; this is a numerical maximization within a stated ansatz, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The paper even notes a deviation from its own prior framework ('contrary to Ref. 1'), indicating that Ref. [7] is not being imported uncritically. Self-citations to Ref. [7] provide the independently published radiative baseline, while the thermoradiative side is derived in this manuscript; the ansatz limitation is a rigor concern, not circularity. No step reduces by construction to its own input, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities. Its bounds rest on idealizations (far-field, unit view factor, ideal Carnot engines, spectrally decomposable reciprocal converters) and on standard radiation thermodynamics. The only fitted numbers are the optimization coefficients for the reciprocal-bound temperature profile in the Supplemental Material.

free parameters (1)
  • Polynomial coefficients for reciprocal-bound temperature profile TE(E) = not specified (7th-order polynomial, numerically optimized)
    The reciprocal bound in the Supplemental Material is computed by fitting a 7th-order polynomial for TE(E) to maximize power at fixed efficiency; these coefficients are numerical optimization parameters, not physical constants.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Steady-state far-field radiative exchange; all photons emitted by the engine reach the sink and vice versa (unit view factor)
    Section II: 'we do not consider near-field effects. We also assume that all photons emitted by the heat engine reach the sink, and vice versa, such that we only need to consider exchanged power densities.'
  • domain assumption Blackbody emission follows the Stefan-Boltzmann law and Planck spectrum with a single converter temperature TE
    Used throughout Eqs. 3-9 for the endoreversible and nonreciprocal models.
  • ad hoc to paper The optimal reciprocal converter can be modeled as an infinite set of spectrally independent blackbody-Carnot sub-engines with temperature profile TE(E)
    Supplemental Material, 'Reciprocal bound'; inherited from Ref [7], not proved in this paper. Load-bearing for the reciprocal bound and the reciprocal dual conclusion.
  • standard math Nonreciprocal isentropic conversion conserves photon entropy, giving the 4/3 factor in Eqs. 6-7
    From Landsberg and Tonge exergy of radiation and Ref [2]; standard result for blackbody radiation entropy.
  • domain assumption Carnot engines inside the models are reversible and ideal
    Endoreversible and reciprocal models couple blackbodies to ideal Carnot engines; any real engine has additional irreversibilities.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fundamental limitations of thermoradiative energy conversion." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SXZW6PTP

@misc{pith2026250719864,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fundamental limitations of thermoradiative energy conversion},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SXZW6PTP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.19864}
}
read the original abstract

Understanding the fundamental limits of various energy conversion approaches is essential for assessing their efficiency and power output. In this work, we derive general performance bounds for thermoradiative heat engines that exchange heat radiatively with a cold sink, establishing power-versus-efficiency thermodynamic bounds for several configurations. We find that the performance of these engines is always bounded by that of radiative engines, which harness the thermal radiation emitted by a hot source, making thermoradiative engines inherently less favorable for energy conversion. By unifying the results of radiative and thermoradiative engines within a common thermodynamic framework, which also encompasses dual-engine configurations that combine both features, this work provides a comprehensive understanding of the thermodynamic limits of radiative energy conversion. Our framework offers general metrics for evaluating specific devices and raises critical questions regarding the relevance of thermoradiative cells for energy production.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.19864 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (a) General representation of a thermoradiative heat [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Thermodynamic performance limits of thermoradia [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. Illustration of a dual radiative engine and its decompo [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Power versus efficiency characteristics of (a) endoreversi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 32 canonical work pages

  1. [3]

    Park , author Z

    author author Y. Park , author Z. Omair ,\ and\ author S. Fan ,\ title title Nonreciprocal Thermophotovoltaic Systems ,\ @noop journal journal ACS Photonics \ volume 9 ,\ pages 3943 ( year 2022 a ) NoStop

    work page 2022

  2. [1]

    Shiraishi , author K

    author author N. Shiraishi , author K. Saito ,\ and\ author H. Tasaki ,\ title title Universal Trade - Off Relation between Power and Efficiency for Heat Engines ,\ @noop journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 117 ,\ pages 190601 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    work page 2016

  3. [2]

    Buddhiraju , author P

    author author S. Buddhiraju , author P. Santhanam ,\ and\ author S. Fan ,\ title title Thermodynamic limits of energy harvesting from outgoing thermal radiation ,\ @noop journal journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences \ volume 115 ,\ pages E3609 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    author author F. L. \ Curzon \ and\ author B. Ahlborn ,\ title title Efficiency of a Carnot engine at maximum power output ,\ @noop journal journal American Journal of Physics \ volume 43 ,\ pages 22 ( year 1975 ) NoStop

    work page 1975

  5. [5]

    author author C. Van den Broeck ,\ title title Thermodynamic Efficiency at Maximum Power ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.190602 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 95 ,\ pages 190602 ( year 2005 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.95.190602 2005

  6. [6]

    Pietzonka \ and\ author U

    author author P. Pietzonka \ and\ author U. Seifert ,\ title title Universal Trade - Off between Power , Efficiency , and Constancy in Steady - State Heat Engines ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.120.190602 journal journal Physical Review Letters \ volume 120 ,\ pages 190602 ( year 2018 ) NoStop

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.190602

  7. [8]

    Pusch , author J

    author author A. Pusch , author J. M. \ Gordon , author A. Mellor , author J. J. \ Krich ,\ and\ author N. J. \ Ekins-Daukes ,\ title title Fundamental Efficiency Bounds for the Conversion of a Radiative Heat Engine 's Own Emission into Work ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.064018 journal journal Physical Review Applied \ volume 12 ,\ pages 06...

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevapplied.12.064018

  8. [9]

    Li , author S

    author author W. Li , author S. Buddhiraju ,\ and\ author S. Fan ,\ title title Thermodynamic limits for simultaneous energy harvesting from the hot sun and cold outer space ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-020-0296-x journal journal Light: Science & Applications \ volume 9 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    work page doi:10.1038/s41377-020-0296-x

Show all 36 references
  1. [10]

    Legendre \ and\ author P.-O

    author author J. Legendre \ and\ author P.-O. \ Chapuis ,\ title title Operating conditions and thermodynamic bounds of dual radiative heat engines ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.23.034023 journal journal Physical Review Applied \ volume 23 ,\ pages 034023 ( year 20...

    doi

  2. [11]

    author author S. J. \ Byrnes , author R. Blanchard ,\ and\ author F. Capasso ,\ title title Harvesting renewable energy from Earth ’s mid-infrared emissions ,\ https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1402036111 journal journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences \ volume 111 ...

    doi

  3. [12]

    Deppe \ and\ author J

    author author T. Deppe \ and\ author J. N. \ Munday ,\ title title Nighttime Photovoltaic Cells : Electrical Power Generation by Optically Coupling with Deep Space ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.9b00679 journal journal ACS Photonics \ volume 7 ,\ pages 1 ( year 2020 ) NoStop

    doi

  4. [13]

    Datas , author A

    author author A. Datas , author A. López-Ceballos , author E. López , author A. Ramos ,\ and\ author C. del Cañizo ,\ title title Latent heat thermophotovoltaic batteries ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2022.01.010 journal journal Joule \ volume 6 ,\ pages 418 ( year 2022 ) NoStop

    2022 doi

  5. [14]

    Chen , author Y

    author author S. Chen , author Y. Guo , author Q. Pan ,\ and\ author Y. Shuai ,\ title title A review on current development of thermophotovoltaic technology in heat recovery ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-7990/ad1dca journal journal International Journal of Extreme Manufactu...

    doi

  6. [15]

    Santhanam \ and\ author S

    author author P. Santhanam \ and\ author S. Fan ,\ title title Thermal-to-electrical energy conversion by diodes under negative illumination ,\ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.161410 journal journal Physical Review B \ volume 93 ,\ pages 161410 ( year 2016 ) NoStop

    doi

  7. [16]

    Ono , author P

    author author M. Ono , author P. Santhanam , author W. Li , author B. Zhao ,\ and\ author S. Fan ,\ title title Experimental demonstration of energy harvesting from the sky using the negative illumination effect of a semiconductor photodiode ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/1.508978...

    doi

  8. [17]

    author author M. P. \ Nielsen , author A. Pusch , author M. H. \ Sazzad , author P. M. \ Pearce , author P. J. \ Reece ,\ and\ author N. J. \ Ekins-Daukes ,\ title title Thermoradiative Power Conversion from HgCdTe Photodiodes and Their Current – Voltage Characteristics ,\ htt...

    doi

  9. [18]

    Belkadi , author A

    author author A. Belkadi , author A. Weerakkody , author G. Lasser ,\ and\ author G. Moddel ,\ title title Demonstration of Thermoradiative Power Generation Using Compensated Infrared Rectennas ,\ https://doi.org/10.1021/acsphotonics.3c00537 journal journal ACS Photonics \ vol...

    doi

  10. [19]

    LaPotin , author K

    author author A. LaPotin , author K. L. \ Schulte , author M. A. \ Steiner , author K. Buznitsky , author C. C. \ Kelsall , author D. J. \ Friedman , author E. J. \ Tervo , author R. M. \ France , author M. R. \ Young , author A. Rohskopf , author S. Verma , author E. N. \ Wan...

    2022

  11. [20]

    Roy-Layinde , author J

    author author B. Roy-Layinde , author J. Lim , author C. Arneson , author S. R. \ Forrest ,\ and\ author A. Lenert ,\ title title High-efficiency air-bridge thermophotovoltaic cells ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2024.05.002 journal journal Joule \ volume 8 ,\ pages 2135 (...

    2024 doi

  12. [21]

    Giteau , author M

    author author M. Giteau , author M. F. \ Picardi ,\ and\ author G. T. \ Papadakis ,\ title title Thermodynamic figure of merit for thermophotovoltaics ,\ https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JPE.14.042402 journal journal Journal of Photonics for Energy \ volume 14 ,\ pages 042402 ( year ...

    doi

  13. [22]

    author author R. Strandberg ,\ title title Theoretical efficiency limits for thermoradiative energy conversion ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 117 ,\ pages 055105 ( year 2015 ) NoStop

    2015

  14. [23]

    Bohm , author A

    author author P. Bohm , author A. K. \ Menon ,\ and\ author Z. M. \ Zhang ,\ title title Fundamental advantages of multijunction thermoradiative cells ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0273591 journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 137 ,\ pages 225001 ( year 2025 ) NoStop

    doi

  15. [24]

    author author A. De Vos ,\ title title The endoreversible theory of solar energy conversion: a tutorial ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/0927-0248(93)90008-Q journal journal Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells \ volume 31 ,\ pages 75 ( year 1993 ) NoStop

    doi

  16. [25]

    author author M. A. \ Green ,\ @noop title Third Generation Photovoltaics Advanced Solar Energy Conversion \ ( publisher Springer ,\ address Berlin; Heidelberg ,\ year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003

  17. [26]

    author author P. T. \ Landsberg \ and\ author G. Tonge ,\ title title Thermodynamic energy conversion efficiencies ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 51 ,\ pages R1 ( year 1980 ) NoStop

    1980

  18. [27]

    Ries ,\ title title Complete and reversible absorption of radiation ,\ @noop journal journal Applied Physics B \ volume 32 ,\ pages 153 ( year 1983 ) NoStop

    author author H. Ries ,\ title title Complete and reversible absorption of radiation ,\ @noop journal journal Applied Physics B \ volume 32 ,\ pages 153 ( year 1983 ) NoStop

    1983

  19. [28]

    author author K. J. \ Shayegan , author S. Biswas , author B. Zhao , author S. Fan ,\ and\ author H. A. \ Atwater ,\ title title Direct observation of the violation of Kirchhoff ’s law of thermal radiation ,\ https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-023-01261-6 journal journal Nature Ph...

    doi

  20. [29]

    Park , author B

    author author Y. Park , author B. Zhao ,\ and\ author S. Fan ,\ title title Reaching the Ultimate Efficiency of Solar Energy Harvesting with a Nonreciprocal Multijunction Solar Cell ,\ @noop journal journal Nano Letters \ volume 22 ,\ pages 448 ( year 2022 b ) NoStop

    2022

  21. [30]

    Wurfel ,\ title title The chemical potential of radiation ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics \ volume 15 ,\ pages 3967 ( year 1982 ) NoStop

    author author P. Wurfel ,\ title title The chemical potential of radiation ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Physics C: Solid State Physics \ volume 15 ,\ pages 3967 ( year 1982 ) NoStop

    1982

  22. [31]

    author author I. A. O. \ Tedah , author F. Maculewicz , author D. E. \ Wolf ,\ and\ author R. Schmechel ,\ title title Thermoelectrics versus thermophotovoltaics: two approaches to convert heat fluxes into electricity ,\ https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6463/ab1833 journal journal...

    doi

  23. [32]

    \ Harder \ and\ author M

    author author N.-P. \ Harder \ and\ author M. A. \ Green ,\ title title Thermophotonics ,\ @noop journal journal Semiconductor Science and Technology \ volume 18 ,\ pages S270 ( year 2003 ) NoStop

    2003

  24. [33]

    Laroche , author R

    author author M. Laroche , author R. Carminati ,\ and\ author J.-J. \ Greffet ,\ title title Near-field thermophotovoltaic energy conversion ,\ @noop journal journal Journal of Applied Physics \ volume 100 ,\ pages 063704 ( year 2006 ) NoStop

    2006

  25. [34]

    Pascale , author M

    author author M. Pascale , author M. Giteau ,\ and\ author G. T. \ Papadakis ,\ title title Perspective on near-field radiative heat transfer ,\ https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0142651 journal journal Applied Physics Letters \ volume 122 ,\ pages 100501 ( year 2023 ) NoStop

    doi

  26. [35]

    Legendre \ and\ author P.-O

    author author J. Legendre \ and\ author P.-O. \ Chapuis ,\ title title GaAs -based near-field thermophotonic devices: Approaching the idealized case with one-dimensional PN junctions ,\ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2022.111594 journal journal Solar Energy Materials and Sol...

    2022

  27. [36]

    Giteau , author M

    author author M. Giteau , author M. F. \ Picardi ,\ and\ author G. T. \ Papadakis ,\ title title Thermodynamic performance bounds for radiative heat engines , \ https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.20.L061003 journal journal Physical Review Applied \ volume 20 ,\ pages L0610...

    doi

  28. [37]

    Buddhiraju , author P

    author author S. Buddhiraju , author P. Santhanam ,\ and\ author S. Fan ,\ title title Thermodynamic limits of energy harvesting from outgoing thermal radiation , \ @noop journal journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences \ volume 115 ,\ pages E3609--E3615 ( year ...

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.