Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Neural Network Branch-and-Bound for Neural Network Verification

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2107.12855 v1 pith:TALM4XO5 submitted 2021-07-27 cs.LG cs.AI

classification cs.LGcs.AI
keywords verificationnetworknetworksneuralbranch-and-boundbranchingeffectiveframework
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Many available formal verification methods have been shown to be instances of a unified Branch-and-Bound (BaB) formulation. We propose a novel machine learning framework that can be used for designing an effective branching strategy as well as for computing better lower bounds. Specifically, we learn two graph neural networks (GNN) that both directly treat the network we want to verify as a graph input and perform forward-backward passes through the GNN layers. We use one GNN to simulate the strong branching heuristic behaviour and another to compute a feasible dual solution of the convex relaxation, thereby providing a valid lower bound. We provide a new verification dataset that is more challenging than those used in the literature, thereby providing an effective alternative for testing algorithmic improvements for verification. Whilst using just one of the GNNs leads to a reduction in verification time, we get optimal performance when combining the two GNN approaches. Our combined framework achieves a 50\% reduction in both the number of branches and the time required for verification on various convolutional networks when compared to several state-of-the-art verification methods. In addition, we show that our GNN models generalize well to harder properties on larger unseen networks.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fast SDP certification of neural networks : towards large multi-class datasets

    math.CO 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An untargeted SDP relaxation certifies full multi-class ReLU robustness in a single solve, with stable-active neuron pruning that shrinks the matrices and accelerates convergence.

  2. Learning to Split: A Reinforcement-Learning-Guided Splitting Heuristic for Neural Network Verification

    cs.LO 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A DQfD-trained ReLU-splitting policy modestly improves Marabou's average verification time on ACAS Xu, but not the number of iterations as claimed.

Pith tools