Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 cited by

The MiniPile Challenge for Data-Efficient Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2304.08442 v1 pith:TCXGBUXN submitted 2023-04-17 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords minipilelanguagedatasetsmodelchallengecorpusdatadiverse
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

The ever-growing diversity of pre-training text corpora has equipped language models with generalization capabilities across various downstream tasks. However, such diverse datasets are often too large for academic budgets; hence, most research on Transformer architectures, training procedures, optimizers, etc. gets conducted on smaller, homogeneous datasets. To this end, we present The MiniPile Challenge, where one pre-trains a language model on a diverse text corpus containing at most 1M documents. MiniPile is a 6GB subset of the deduplicated 825GB The Pile corpus. To curate MiniPile, we perform a simple, three-step data filtering process: we (1) infer embeddings for all documents of the Pile, (2) cluster the embedding space using $k$-means, and (3) filter out low-quality clusters. To verify MiniPile's suitability for language model pre-training, we use it to pre-train a BERT and T5 model, yielding a performance drop of only $1.9\%$/$2.5\%$ on the GLUE and SNI benchmarks compared to the original pre-trained checkpoints trained on $2.6$x/$745$x the amount of data. MiniPile is available at https://huggingface.co/datasets/JeanKaddour/minipile.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 8 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Causal Estimation of Tokenisation Bias

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Using regression discontinuity, the paper shows that adding a subword to a tokenizer's vocabulary can raise the model's probability for that string by up to about 17 times in small models.

  2. Joint Optimization for Greedy Longest-match Tokenization

    cs.CL 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    JOLT trains subword vocabularies by directly optimizing token counts under greedy longest-match decoding, certifies via an LP bound that BPE is within 1–2% of the achievable optimum, and recovers most of that small ga...

  3. Dataset Ownership Verification for Pre-trained Masked Models

    cs.CV 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    DOV4MM detects whether a masked pre-trained model was trained on a given dataset via relative embedding reconstruction difficulty, reporting p<0.05 in tests on ImageNet-1K and WikiText-103.

  4. KV-Latent: Dimensional-level KV Cache Reduction with Frequency-aware Rotary Positional Embedding

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    By downsampling key and value head dimensions and retraining with distillation, KV-Latent cuts KV cache memory by about 50% on 7-8B LLMs while keeping average benchmark scores within about 1 point of the base model.

  5. ByteSpan: Information-Driven Subword Tokenisation

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A tokeniser that groups predictable bytes using a byte-level LM's surprisal or entropy achieves higher morphological alignment than BPE without loss of compression.

  6. Sparsified State-Space Models are Efficient Highway Networks

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Simba prunes tokens hierarchically in pre-trained SSMs, creating sparse upper layers that act as highways, improving the accuracy-FLOPs trade-off and long-context perplexity.

  7. Enabling Flexible Multi-LLM Integration for Scalable Knowledge Aggregation

    cs.CL 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Adaptive selection and dynamic weighted fusion of source LLMs reduces knowledge interference and improves target model accuracy compared to FuseLLM.

  8. MoETuner: Optimized Mixture of Expert Serving with Balanced Expert Placement and Token Routing

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    MoETuner formulates MoE expert placement as two ILPs to balance token loads and minimize inter-GPU communication, reporting 9.3% and 17.5% end-to-end inference speedups on Mixtral-8x7B.

Pith tools