REVIEW 3 cited by
Common Ground Tracking in Multimodal Dialogue
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Within Dialogue Modeling research in AI and NLP, considerable attention has been spent on ``dialogue state tracking'' (DST), which is the ability to update the representations of the speaker's needs at each turn in the dialogue by taking into account the past dialogue moves and history. Less studied but just as important to dialogue modeling, however, is ``common ground tracking'' (CGT), which identifies the shared belief space held by all of the participants in a task-oriented dialogue: the task-relevant propositions all participants accept as true. In this paper we present a method for automatically identifying the current set of shared beliefs and ``questions under discussion'' (QUDs) of a group with a shared goal. We annotate a dataset of multimodal interactions in a shared physical space with speech transcriptions, prosodic features, gestures, actions, and facets of collaboration, and operationalize these features for use in a deep neural model to predict moves toward construction of common ground. Model outputs cascade into a set of formal closure rules derived from situated evidence and belief axioms and update operations. We empirically assess the contribution of each feature type toward successful construction of common ground relative to ground truth, establishing a benchmark in this novel, challenging task.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
An Exploration of Internal States in Collaborative Problem Solving
In a Lego-based collaborative task, participants' retrospective verbal reports show distinct linguistic patterns, with positive emotion labels such as 'Engaged' and 'Optimistic' appearing most frequently.
-
Dynamic Epistemic Friction in Dialogue
A vector-based belief-update model, grounded in dynamic epistemic logic, predicts final block-weight beliefs in a collaborative task from dialogue friction.
-
A Methodological Framework for Capturing Cognitive-Affective States in Collaborative Learning
A pilot study combines self-caught and probe-caught retrospective reporting to measure cognitive-affective states during collaborative learning, finding Optimistic, Curious, and Confused most frequent.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.