REVIEW 3 cited by
Enhancement of charm CP violation due to nearby resonances
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
abstract
Quantitative understanding of CP violation is extremely important as naturalness reasoning strongly suggests that new physics should be accompanied by beyond the Standard Model CP-odd phases. In 2019 LHCb made the first $5 \sigma$ discovery of CP violation in the charm system, leading to the new world average $\Delta a_{CP}^{\mathrm{dir}} = -0.00161 \pm 0.00028$. While some calculations have found this observation as requiring new physics, we suggest that scalar resonances nearby to $m_{D^0}$, in particular, $f_0(1710)$ and/or $f_0(1790)$ cause enhancements for CP violation within the SM. Thereby, our calculations based on the Standard Model suggest compatibility with the LHCb observations for now. However, experimental information especially on $f_0(1790)$ is rather sparse limiting our accuracy and further data on these resonances is strongly advocated.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Search for $CP$ violation in $\Xi_c^+\to\Sigma^+h^+h^-$ and $\Lambda_c^+\to ph^+h^-$ at Belle II
First individual A_CP measurements for Xi_c+ -> Sigma+ h+h- and Lambda_c+ -> p h+h- decays, all consistent with CP symmetry and with U-spin sum-rule predictions.
-
Measurement of the CP asymmetry in $D^+ \to \pi^+ \pi^0$ decays at Belle II
The new world-best measurement of the CP asymmetry in D+ -> pi+ pi0 decays is (-1.8 +/- 0.9 +/- 0.1)%, consistent with zero and with the Standard Model.
-
Measurement of the time-integrated $CP$ asymmetry in $D^0\to\pi^0\pi^0$ decays at Belle II
Belle II measures A_CP(D0 -> pi0 pi0) = (0.30 ± 0.72 ± 0.20)%, consistent with no CP violation and with the previous Belle measurement.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.