REVIEW 3 cited by
Engineering Trustworthy AI: A Developer Guide for Empirical Risk Minimization
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
AI systems increasingly shape critical decisions across personal and societal domains. While empirical risk minimization (ERM) drives much of the AI success, it typically prioritizes accuracy over trustworthiness, often resulting in biases, opacity, and other adverse effects. This paper discusses how key requirements for trustworthy AI can be translated into design choices for the components of ERM. We hope to provide actionable guidance for building AI systems that meet emerging standards for trustworthiness of AI.
Forward citations
Cited by 3 Pith papers
-
Robust OOD Graph Learning via Mean Constraints and Noise Reduction
CMO adds a class-mean proximity constraint to distributionally robust optimization and NNR reweights graph samples by local label consistency, together improving minority-class accuracy in graph OOD experiments.
-
Beyond Explainability: The Case for AI Validation
AI governance should shift from explainability to validation as its central regulatory pillar, with a typology of valid-versus-explainable systems.
-
Federated Learning: From Theory to Practice
A textbook that frames personalized federated learning as generalized total variation minimization over a device similarity graph.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.