Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

Probing Non-Graviton Spectra in $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM via BMN truncation and S-Duality

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read BMN index exposes black-hole microstates beyond gravitons.

desk verdict A careful, honest computation of BMN indices that identifies non-graviton towers and an explicit SO(7) operator, with the caveat that the physical interpretation rests on an unproven but clearly flagged conjecture. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.13887 v1 pith:TOXREP6E submitted 2025-06-16 hep-th

Abhijit Gadde , Eunwoo Lee , Rajat Raj , Shivansh Tomar This is my paper · ORCID
classification hep-th
keywords superconformalindexN=4supersymmetricYang-MillsBMNtruncationnon-gravitoncohomologyS-dualityone-loopnonrenormalizationconjectureresidueintegrationblackholemicrostates
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper claims that the superconformal index (a weighted count of protected operators) restricted to the BMN sector of $SU(N)$ $\mathcal{N}=4$ super Yang-Mills can be computed in closed form as a rational function, and that its denominator carries universal non-graviton towers for every rank $N=2,\ldots,6$. The factors $(1-t^{6N})$ and $(1-t^{6N-4})^3$ signal bosonic single-trace operators $\mathrm{Tr}[f^N]$ and $\mathrm{Tr}[f^{N-1}\bar\phi]$, whose charges no graviton generator can match; the paper reads them as a protected bosonic Fock space built on non-graviton core states, possibly recording microstructure of the supersymmetric black hole. For the S-dual pair $SO(7)$ and $Sp(3)$, the BMN indices differ at order $t^{18}$, and the paper isolates a single explicit fermionic non-graviton cohomology in $SO(7)$, Eq. (4.23), responsible for the mismatch. Under the one-loop exactness conjecture, such mismatches imply that S-duality exchanges letter-based truncations with novel non-letter-based subrings, giving a concrete way to test the conjecture.

What carries the argument

The workhorse is the BMN truncation of the one-loop theory, built from the letters $\{\bar\phi^m,\psi^{m+},f^{++}\}$ and closed under the action of the supercharge $Q$, together with the matrix-integral formula for the superconformal index over that sector. Because the single-letter index there is a finite polynomial in the fugacities, the integral has finitely many poles, and the paper evaluates it exactly with a residue algorithm: pole-tuples are built inductively, ordered by a preferred partial order, and each denominator factor $(1-x)$ in the resulting rational index is read as a bosonic ring generator. Comparing the full index with the graviton index, built from diagonalized Cartan generators in the $S_n$ multiplets, isolates which denominator towers are non-graviton; comparing the $SO(7)$ and $Sp(3)$ BMN indices then turns S-duality into a diagnostic, because coincident graviton spectra force any index difference to come from non-graviton cohomologies.

What would settle it

Compute the 1-loop $Q$-cohomology of $Sp(3)$ at charges $(5/2,5/2,5/2,1/2,1/2)$, using the only possible letter contents $\bar\lambda^2\psi\phi^4$ and $D\bar\lambda\phi^6$: if no fermionic 1-loop BPS operator appears there, or in any charge sector contributing the same index weight, to match the $SO(7)$ operator $O$ of Eq. (4.23), then the one-loop exactness conjecture is false, given that the full superconformal indices of $SO(7)$ and $Sp(3)$ are known to agree.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that, after summing all residue contributions to the unitary matrix integral, the BMN index of $SU(N)$ is a rational function whose denominator includes $(1-t^{6N})$ and $(1-t^{6N-4})^3$ for $N=2,\ldots,6$; these factors correspond to the bosonic single-trace operators $\mathrm{Tr}[f^N]$ and $\mathrm{Tr}[f^{N-1}\bar\phi]$, which are non-graviton because graviton towers in the BMN sector can only reach $t^{2N+4}$. The paper further claims that the BMN indices of the S-dual pair $SO(7)$ and $Sp(3)$ do not match, with the leading mismatch at $t^{18}$ attributable to one fermionic non-graviton cohomology in $SO(7)$ displayed explicitly in Eq. (4.23). Since the graviton spectra of the two theories coincide, the mismatch itself is a direct signature of non-graviton states.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the one-loop non-renormalization conjecture — that the one-loop BPS spectrum is isomorphic, as a charge-preserving ring, to the exact BPS spectrum at all couplings — without which the denominator towers and the S-duality mismatch would say nothing about the strongly coupled black-hole spectrum.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For every $SU(N)$ with $N=2,\ldots,6$, the denominator factors $(1-t^{6N})$ and $(1-t^{6N-4})^3$ imply protected single-trace non-graviton operators $\mathrm{Tr}[f^N]$ and $\mathrm{Tr}[f^{N-1}\bar\phi]$, and the residue calculation suggests the same pattern holds for all $N$.
  • The difference $I_{\mathrm{SO(7)}}-I_{\mathrm{Sp(3)}}=-t^{18}+\cdots$ fixes the charges of the lightest $SO(7)$ non-graviton state; the explicit operator in Eq. (4.23) is the representative that S-duality requires to have a matching partner in $Sp(3)$.
  • If the one-loop exactness conjecture is correct, the BMN mismatch predicts that $Sp(3)$ contains a non-letter-based subring $\tilde{T}$ isomorphic to the $SO(7)$ BMN subring, and similarly for other truncations, so constructing or ruling out these subrings tests the conjecture.
  • The BMN sector entropy grows at most like $N^2 \log j$, far slower than the large black hole scaling $(N^2 j^2)^{1/3}$, so the non-graviton towers enrich the protected spectrum but do not by themselves reproduce the full black-hole entropy.
  • The coefficient distributions in Figures 5 and 6 suggest a universal large-$N$ shape for the BMN index numerator; quantifying it would give the sector's entropy growth and a sharper target for holographic comparison.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A direct test of the universality claim would be to compute the $SU(7)$ BMN index with the same residue algorithm: the pole-tuple argument predicts denominator factors $(1-t^{42})$ and $(1-t^{38})^3$, so their absence would break the tower pattern.
  • The same S-duality-difference diagnostic could be applied to higher-rank $SO(2N+1)$ versus $Sp(N)$ pairs, where the full superconformal index is already known to match; any truncation mismatch would locate additional non-graviton cohomologies without computing a graviton index.
  • In the $SU(2)$ case the tower is generated by $\mathrm{Tr}[f^2_{++}]$ with a grey-galaxy-like multiplication rule; one speculative extension is that each charge sector in higher $N$ has a single seed non-graviton cohomology whose powers generate the whole tower.
  • Because the BMN matrix model shares the same field content as the truncation, its Witten index may display the same denominator factors; searching for $(1-t^{6N})(1-t^{6N-4})^3$ there would check whether the tower is a feature of the truncated SYM dynamics or of the matrix model alone.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the 1-loop Q-cohomology of N=4 SYM restricted to the BMN truncation. It proposes a residue-based algorithm for computing the BMN index and presents closed-form rational expressions for SU(N) with N=2,...,6. From the denominators it extracts factors (1-t^{6N})(1-t^{6N-4})^3, which it interprets as towers of bosonic non-graviton generators. It then computes the BMN indices of the S-dual pair SO(7) and Sp(3), finds a mismatch beginning at order t^18, and identifies an explicit fermionic non-graviton cohomology in SO(7). It also shows that another letter-based truncation gives mismatched SO(7)/Sp(3) indices. The physical interpretation of these results as statements about exact black-hole microstates is made conditional on Conjectures 1 and 2 of Section 2, which assert that the 1-loop cohomology is isomorphic, as a charge-preserving ring, to the exact cohomology.

Significance. If Conjectures 1 and 2 hold, the paper gives a concrete and nontrivial window into non-graviton cohomologies: the denominator towers are explicit candidate protected generators, and the SO(7)/Sp(3) mismatch is a sharp diagnostic that also suggests a new way to test the 1-loop exactness conjecture. The residue algorithm is a useful technical contribution, and the explicit SO(7) operator in Eq. (4.23), together with the state counts in Eq. (4.22), is a concrete checkable result. The main limitation is that the headline physical claims are conditional on an unproven conjecture; the index computations themselves are 1-loop statements. The paper is transparent about this conditionality in places, but the abstract and introduction sometimes state the conclusions in stronger, unconditional language.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3.1.2, §3.2] The completeness of the BMN pole-tuple enumeration is asserted rather than proven. The text says that pole-tuples are constructed inductively and shows diagrams for N=3 and N=6, but it does not prove that every contributing pole-tuple is obtained, nor does it explain how higher-order poles such as the N=6 double pole are handled systematically. Since the closed-form indices for N=4,5,6 depend on summing all residues, the central denominator claims rest on this unproven completeness. The authors should either supply a proof or state explicitly that the enumeration is verified only by the series-expansion check, specifying the order to which the expansion was matched.
  2. [§3.2, Eqs. (3.29)-(3.31)] The SU(4), SU(5), and SU(6) numerators are omitted and replaced by a plot of coefficient logarithms in Figure 5. This makes the claim that the BMN index is computed 'in closed form' not independently verifiable from the manuscript. Please include the full polynomials in an ancillary file or appendix, or at least state the number of terms and the order to which the series expansion was checked against the rational form.
  3. [§3.3, §3.4] The universal tower claim—that the denominator contains (1-t^{6N})(1-t^{6N-4})^3 for all N and that the non-graviton tower runs from j=2N+6 to 6N except at j=6N-2—is extrapolated from N=2,...,6 together with the residue of a single pole-tuple. The residue of one pole-tuple shows these factors appear in that residue, but it does not prove they survive cancellations in the full sum of all residues for general N. This must be rephrased as an observed pattern, or proved, before it is called universal.
  4. [Abstract, §4.4] The central physical interpretation—that the denominator towers are exact protected non-graviton generators and that the SO(7)/Sp(3) mismatch reveals new S-dual cohomology subrings—depends on Conjectures 1 and 2, which are not proven. The paper is commendably explicit about this in Section 4.4 and in the final conditional sentence of the abstract, but the earlier abstract sentence 'This suggests a novel microstructure within the supersymmetric black hole itself' is stated without the same caveat. The unconditional 1-loop results should be cleanly separated from the conjectural exact-spectrum interpretation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4.1, Eq. (4.4)] The second displayed formula in Eq. (4.4) is labeled chi_adj^{Sp(N)} but should be chi_adj^{SO(2N+1)}.
  2. [§2.2] The sentence 'In gauge theories For higher ranks N' > N' is grammatically garbled and should be rewritten.
  3. [§3.1] The claim that the integral is independent of the shift z_i -> z_i - u is stated without addressing the contour deformation when |u| is not 1. A brief justification would improve rigor, especially because the residue method is central to the paper.
  4. [§3.4] The notation in Eq. (3.42) for the tower operators On is introduced after the denominator interpretation but the definitions of xi and chi are deferred to a reference; this is acceptable but should be flagged more clearly in the text.
  5. [§4.2] The numerators in Eqs. (4.15) and (4.16) are truncated with ellipses; given that the difference in Eq. (4.17) is the main object, providing the full difference polynomial in an ancillary file would aid reproducibility.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the BMN index computations are self-contained and independently checked; the non-graviton and S-duality interpretations are explicitly conditional on an external conjecture, not on fitted inputs.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The BMN index is evaluated from the letter-based matrix integral (3.8) by a residue algorithm, and the closed forms for SU(2) through SU(6) are independently checked by expanding the integrand and integrating term by term. The identification of non-graviton towers is not a fit: the graviton index is constructed explicitly from the S_n multiplets, and the denominator factors (1-t^{6N})(1-t^{6N-4})^3 carry charges t^{6N} and t^{6N-4} that exceed the maximal graviton generator charge t^{2N+4}, so their non-graviton character follows from the charges rather than from assuming the conclusion. Similarly, the SO(7)/Sp(3) mismatch is an exact difference of the independently computed indices (4.5), and the SO(7) cohomology (4.23) is located by the explicit counting 903 - 220 - 559 - 123 = 1, a computation in the free/1-loop theory. The 1-loop non-renormalization Conjectures 1 and 2 are stated as assumptions, and every strong physical conclusion is made conditional on them (e.g., 'If the conjecture of exactness of one-loop cohomology is correct...'); a conditional external conjecture may be a correctness risk, but it is not a fitted parameter or a self-referential derivation. The few self-citations to [21,22] provide auxiliary operator expressions and graviton-index details, not the load-bearing argument, so they do not raise the circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 2 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on an unproven conjecture from the literature (1-loop exactness) and on an assumed completeness of the residue pole enumeration. No free parameters are fitted and no new physical entities are postulated.

assumptions (2)
  • domain assumption 1-loop non-renormalization conjecture: V^g is vector space and ring isomorphic to V^{1-loop} preserving charges (Conjectures 1 and 2, Section 2).
    Load-bearing for the interpretation that the BMN denominator towers and the SO(7)/Sp(3) index mismatch correspond to exact protected non-graviton operators and new S-dual subrings.
  • ad hoc to paper Completeness of the BMN pole-tuple enumeration in the residue algorithm.
    The paper constructs pole-tuples inductively and verifies by expansion, but does not give a proof that no other poles contribute to the BMN matrix integral for general N.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Probing Non-Graviton Spectra in $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM via BMN truncation and S-Duality." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TOXREP6E

@misc{pith2026250613887,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Probing Non-Graviton Spectra in $\mathcalN=4$ SYM via BMN truncation and S-Duality},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TOXREP6E}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.13887}
}
read the original abstract

The one-loop cohomology of N=4 SYM is conjectured to be isomorphic to the exact cohomology. As a result, its truncations are expected to be subrings of the exact cohomology. We study the superconformal index restricted over one such truncation known as the BMN truncation. We present a systematic algorithm to compute the BMN index using the method of residues. We compute the BMN index for SU(N) SYM for N = 2,...,6 in closed form. It is expressed as a rational function of the fugacity. A term of the type (1-x) in the denominator indicates the presence of a bosonic generator counted with fugacity x. We find a rich and universal set of such terms in the denominator showing an interesting bosonic Fock space in the spectrum of protected operators. This Fock space cannot be explained as coming from the non-interacting supersymmetric graviton gas far away from the black hole as in the grey-galaxy solutions because the charges of the bosonic generators are not compatible with those of the supersymmetric gravitons. This suggests a novel microstructure within the supersymmetric black hole itself. We also examine the indices of S-dual pairs SO(2N+1) and Sp(N) SYM. Although their full 1/16-BPS indices coincide, we find discrepancies in their BMN-sector indices. As the BMN indices restricted to the graviton sector are expected to be the same, this mismatch allows us to identify non-graviton cohomologies. We explicitly find one of them in the SO(7) theory that is responsible for the mismatch of the BMN index. We also show that indices restricted to other one-loop cohomology truncations, in general, do not match under S-duality. If the conjecture of exactness of one-loop cohomology is correct, this suggests the presence of new cohomology subrings that match under S-duality with the letter-based truncations of the one-loop cohomology. This offers a way to check the one-loop exactness conjecture.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Loop Corrected Supercharges from Holomorphic Anomalies

    hep-th 2025-12 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The complete one-loop supercharge for 4d Lagrangian SUSY gauge theories is derived in the holomorphic twist, packaged for N=4 SYM as a compact superfield formula.

  2. Instability of Black Holes in AdS$_3 \times S^3$

    hep-th 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Near-extremal AdS3 x S3 black holes are thermodynamically and dynamically unstable, decaying to a central black hole plus chiral primaries or new macroscopic giant strings.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

48 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    J. B. Gutowski and H. S. Reall,Supersymmetric AdS(5) black holes,JHEP02(2004) 006, [hep-th/0401042]

    arXiv 2004

  2. [2]

    J. B. Gutowski and H. S. Reall,General supersymmetric AdS(5) black holes,JHEP04 (2004) 048, [hep-th/0401129]

    arXiv 2004

  3. [3]

    Cvetic, H

    M. Cvetic, H. Lu, and C. N. Pope,Charged rotating black holes in five dimensional U(1)**3 gauged N=2 supergravity,Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 081502, [hep-th/0407058]

    arXiv 2004

  4. [4]

    Z. W. Chong, M. Cvetic, H. Lu, and C. N. Pope,Five-dimensional gauged supergravity black holes with independent rotation parameters,Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 041901, [hep-th/0505112]

    arXiv 2005

  5. [5]

    Z. W. Chong, M. Cvetic, H. Lu, and C. N. Pope,General non-extremal rotating black holes in minimal five-dimensional gauged supergravity,Phys. Rev. Lett.95(2005) 161301, [hep-th/0506029]

    arXiv 2005

  6. [6]

    H. K. Kunduri, J. Lucietti, and H. S. Reall,Supersymmetric multi-charge AdS(5) black holes, JHEP04(2006) 036, [hep-th/0601156]

    arXiv 2006

  7. [7]

    S. M. Hosseini, K. Hristov, and A. Zaffaroni,An extremization principle for the entropy of rotating BPS black holes in AdS 5,JHEP07(2017) 106, [arXiv:1705.05383]

    arXiv 2017

  8. [8]

    Cabo-Bizet, D

    A. Cabo-Bizet, D. Cassani, D. Martelli, and S. Murthy,Microscopic origin of the Bekenstein-Hawking entropy of supersymmetric AdS 5 black holes,JHEP10(2019) 062, [arXiv:1810.11442]

    arXiv 2019

Show all 48 references
  1. [9]

    S. Choi, J. Kim, S. Kim, and J. Nahmgoong,Large AdS black holes from QFT, arXiv:1810.12067

    arXiv

  2. [10]

    Benini and E

    F. Benini and E. Milan,Black Holes in 4DN=4 Super-Yang-Mills Field Theory,Phys. Rev. X10(2020), no. 2 021037, [arXiv:1812.09613]

    2020 arXiv

  3. [11]

    S. Kim, S. Kundu, E. Lee, J. Lee, S. Minwalla, and C. Patel,‘Grey Galaxies’ as an endpoint of the Kerr-AdS superradiant instability,arXiv:2305.08922

    arXiv

  4. [12]

    Bajaj, V

    K. Bajaj, V. Kumar, S. Minwalla, J. Mukherjee, and A. Rahaman,Grey Galaxies inAdS 5, arXiv:2412.06904. – 36 –

    arXiv

  5. [13]

    S. Choi, D. Jain, S. Kim, V. Krishna, E. Lee, S. Minwalla, and C. Patel,Dual Dressed Black Holes as the end point of the Charged Superradiant instability inN= 4Yang Mills, arXiv:2409.18178

    arXiv

  6. [14]

    S. Choi, D. Jain, S. Kim, V. Krishna, G. Kwon, E. Lee, S. Minwalla, and C. Patel, Supersymmetric Grey Galaxies, Dual Dressed Black Holes and the Superconformal Index, arXiv:2501.17217

  7. [15]

    J. M. Maldacena,The LargeNlimit of superconformal field theories and supergravity,Adv. Theor. Math. Phys.2(1998) 231–252, [hep-th/9711200]

    1998 arXiv

  8. [16]

    Kinney, J

    J. Kinney, J. M. Maldacena, S. Minwalla, and S. Raju,An Index for 4 dimensional super conformal theories,Commun. Math. Phys.275(2007) 209–254, [hep-th/0510251]

    2007 arXiv

  9. [17]

    Berkooz, D

    M. Berkooz, D. Reichmann, and J. Simon,A Fermi Surface Model for Large Supersymmetric AdS(5) Black Holes,JHEP01(2007) 048, [hep-th/0604023]

    2007 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Grant, P

    L. Grant, P. A. Grassi, S. Kim, and S. Minwalla,Comments on 1/16 BPS Quantum States and Classical Configurations,JHEP05(2008) 049, [arXiv:0803.4183]

    2008 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Chang and X

    C.-M. Chang and X. Yin,1/16 BPS states inN=4 super-Yang-Mills theory,Phys. Rev. D 88(2013), no. 10 106005, [arXiv:1305.6314]

    2013 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Chang and Y.-H

    C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin,Words to describe a black hole,JHEP02(2023) 109, [arXiv:2209.06728]

    2023 arXiv

  13. [21]

    S. Choi, S. Kim, E. Lee, and J. Park,The shape of non-graviton operators forSU(2), arXiv:2209.12696

    arXiv

  14. [22]

    S. Choi, S. Kim, E. Lee, S. Lee, and J. Park,Towards quantum black hole microstates, arXiv:2304.10155

    arXiv

  15. [23]

    Chang, L

    C.-M. Chang, L. Feng, Y.-H. Lin, and Y.-X. Tao,Decoding stringy near-supersymmetric black holes,arXiv:2306.04673

    arXiv

  16. [24]

    Budzik, H

    K. Budzik, H. Murali, and P. Vieira,Following Black Hole States,arXiv:2306.04693

    arXiv

  17. [25]

    J. Choi, S. Choi, S. Kim, J. Lee, and S. Lee,Finite N black hole cohomologies,JHEP12 (2024) 029, [arXiv:2312.16443]

    2024 arXiv

  18. [26]

    de Mello Koch, M

    R. de Mello Koch, M. Kim, S. Kim, J. Lee, and S. Lee,Brane-fused black hole operators, arXiv:2412.08695

    arXiv

  19. [27]

    Chang, Y

    C.-M. Chang, Y. Chen, B. S. Sia, and Z. Yang,Fortuity in SYK Models,arXiv:2412.06902

  20. [28]

    Chang, Y.-H

    C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, and H. Zhang,Fortuity in the D1-D5 system,arXiv:2501.05448

  21. [29]

    Chang and Y.-H

    C.-M. Chang and Y.-H. Lin,Holographic covering and the fortuity of black holes, arXiv:2402.10129

    arXiv

  22. [30]

    D. E. Berenstein, J. M. Maldacena, and H. S. Nastase,Strings in flat space and pp waves from N=4 superYang-Mills,JHEP04(2002) 013, [hep-th/0202021]

    2002 arXiv

  23. [31]

    N. Kim, T. Klose, and J. Plefka,Plane wave matrix theory from N=4 superYang-Mills on R x S**3,Nucl. Phys. B671(2003) 359–382, [hep-th/0306054]

    2003 arXiv

  24. [32]

    Chang,Witten index of BMN matrix quantum mechanics,arXiv:2404.18442

    C.-M. Chang,Witten index of BMN matrix quantum mechanics,arXiv:2404.18442

    arXiv

  25. [33]

    R. A. Janik and M. Trzetrzelewski,Supergravitons from one loop perturbative N=4 SYM, Phys. Rev. D77(2008) 085024, [arXiv:0712.2714]. – 37 –

    2008 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Witten,Constraints on Supersymmetry Breaking,Nucl

    E. Witten,Constraints on Supersymmetry Breaking,Nucl. Phys. B202(1982) 253

    1982

  27. [35]

    Banks, W

    T. Banks, W. Fischler, S. H. Shenker, and L. Susskind,M theory as a matrix model: A conjecture,Phys. Rev. D55(1997) 5112–5128, [hep-th/9610043]

    1997 arXiv

  28. [36]

    S. Choi, S. Jeong, and S. Kim,The Yang-Mills duals of small AdS black holes, arXiv:2103.01401

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Nekrasov and A

    N. Nekrasov and A. Okounkov,Seiberg-Witten theory and random partitions,Prog. Math. 244(2006) 525–596, [hep-th/0306238]

    2006 arXiv

  30. [38]

    Felder and M

    G. Felder and M. M¨ uller-Lennert,Analyticity of Nekrasov Partition Functions,Commun. Math. Phys.364(2018), no. 2 683–718, [arXiv:1709.05232]

    2018 arXiv

  31. [39]

    Chang, Y.-H

    C.-M. Chang, Y.-H. Lin, and J. Wu,On 1 8 -BPS black holes and the chiral algebra ofN= 4 SYM,arXiv:2310.20086

    arXiv

  32. [40]

    Witten,Baryons and branes in anti-de Sitter space,JHEP07(1998) 006, [hep-th/9805112]

    E. Witten,Baryons and branes in anti-de Sitter space,JHEP07(1998) 006, [hep-th/9805112]

    1998 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Gadde, E

    A. Gadde, E. Pomoni, L. Rastelli, and S. S. Razamat,S-duality and 2d Topological QFT, JHEP03(2010) 032, [arXiv:0910.2225]

    2010 arXiv

  34. [42]

    V. P. Spiridonov and G. S. Vartanov,Superconformal indices ofN= 4SYM field theories, Lett. Math. Phys.100(2012) 97–118, [arXiv:1005.4196]

    2012 arXiv

  35. [43]

    Amariti, M

    A. Amariti, M. Fazzi, and A. Segati,The SCI ofN= 4 USp(2N c) and SO(N c) SYM as a matrix integral,JHEP06(2021) 132, [arXiv:2012.15208]

    2021 arXiv

  36. [44]

    S. Choi, S. Kim, and J. Song,Large N universality of 4dN= 1 superconformal index and AdS black holes,JHEP08(2024) 105, [arXiv:2309.07614]

    2024 arXiv

  37. [45]

    K. A. Intriligator,Bonus symmetries of N=4 superYang-Mills correlation functions via AdS duality,Nucl. Phys. B551(1999) 575–600, [hep-th/9811047]

    1999 arXiv

  38. [46]

    Chen,Spectral form factor for free large N gauge theory and strings,JHEP06(2022) 137, [arXiv:2202.04741]

    Y. Chen,Spectral form factor for free large N gauge theory and strings,JHEP06(2022) 137, [arXiv:2202.04741]

    2022 arXiv

  39. [47]

    S. Choi, S. Kim, and J. Song,Supersymmetric Spectral Form Factor and Euclidean Black Holes,Phys. Rev. Lett.131(2023), no. 15 151602, [arXiv:2206.15357]

    2023 arXiv

  40. [48]

    Y. Chen, H. W. Lin, and S. H. Shenker,BPS Chaos,SciPost Phys.18(2025) 072, [arXiv:2407.19387]. – 38 –

    2025 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.