pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.25015 · v1 · pith:TTNBHZCFnew · submitted 2026-06-23 · ✦ hep-ph · astro-ph.CO· gr-qc· hep-th

Cosmological gravitational particle production in multifield inflation

Edward W. Kolb , Sarunas Verner , Jingyuan Wang This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-25 23:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph astro-ph.COgr-qchep-th
keywords cosmological gravitational particle productionmultifield inflationfield-space curvaturedark matterRicci scalarsidetracked attractorgravitational coupling
0
0 comments X

The pith

Negative field-space curvature enhances gravitational dark matter production by up to an order of magnitude in multifield inflation.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper investigates cosmological gravitational particle production of dark matter in two-field inflationary models that include both flat and curved field spaces. Using benchmark models based on a Starobinsky plus quadratic potential, the authors compare production in the flat limit to that on a hyperbolic field space with a sidetracked attractor. They find that negative curvature amplifies the oscillations of the Ricci scalar after inflation ends. This amplification raises the number density of produced particles, with the largest effect for scalars that couple minimally to gravity. The work also maps how this affects the final relic abundance as a function of particle mass and reheating temperature.

Core claim

Negative field-space curvature strongly enhances the post-inflationary oscillations of the Ricci scalar in multifield inflation. This leads to an enhancement of up to an order of magnitude in the CGPP number density relative to the flat field-space limit, particularly for minimal coupling. For the sidetracked attractor, this enhanced production competes with a reduced inflationary energy scale, leading to a nontrivial dependence of the relic abundance on model parameters. The conformal coupling case is much less constrained by isocurvature bounds and provides a minimal scenario for purely gravitational dark matter production.

What carries the argument

Negative curvature of the field-space metric driving the sidetracked attractor and amplifying post-inflationary Ricci scalar oscillations.

Load-bearing premise

The benchmark scenarios constructed with the Starobinsky plus quadratic potential are representative of the broader multifield mechanisms under study.

What would settle it

A numerical computation of the Ricci scalar evolution and CGPP spectrum in one of the curved benchmark models that shows no order-of-magnitude enhancement in particle number density.

read the original abstract

We study cosmological gravitational particle production (CGPP) of dark matter in two-field inflationary backgrounds with both flat and curved field-space geometries. As a concrete realization of broader multifield mechanisms, we adopt a Starobinsky+quadratic potential and construct benchmark scenarios that interpolate between the flat field-space limit and the sidetracked attractor on a hyperbolic field space, and we compute the production spectrum of a gravitationally coupled spectator scalar for both minimal ($\xi = 0$) and conformal ($\xi = 1/6$) coupling to the Ricci scalar. We show that negative field-space curvature can strongly enhance the post-inflationary oscillations of the Ricci scalar, leading to an enhancement of up to an order of magnitude in the CGPP number density relative to the flat field-space limit, particularly for minimal coupling. For the sidetracked attractor, this enhanced production competes with a reduced inflationary energy scale, leading to a nontrivial dependence of the relic abundance on model parameters. We derive the relic abundance as a function of spectator mass and reheating temperature, and identify the viable parameter space for each benchmark. The conformal case $\xi = 1/6$, whose scalar mode equation is structurally analogous to that of a massive Dirac fermion, is much less constrained by isocurvature and provides a minimal scenario for purely gravitational dark matter production in multifield inflation.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies cosmological gravitational particle production (CGPP) of a spectator scalar as dark matter in two-field inflation with flat and curved (hyperbolic) field spaces. Using a Starobinsky-plus-quadratic potential, the authors construct benchmark scenarios interpolating between the flat-field-space limit and the sidetracked attractor. They compute the production spectrum for minimal (ξ=0) and conformal (ξ=1/6) couplings to the Ricci scalar, showing that negative field-space curvature enhances post-inflationary Ricci oscillations and boosts the CGPP number density by up to an order of magnitude relative to the flat case (especially at ξ=0). Relic abundances are derived as functions of spectator mass and reheating temperature, viable parameter spaces are identified, and the conformal case is highlighted as less constrained by isocurvature bounds and analogous to fermionic production.

Significance. If the enhancement mechanism holds, the work demonstrates a concrete way in which field-space geometry can modulate post-inflationary dynamics and increase gravitational dark-matter yields in multifield models. The explicit comparison of minimal versus conformal coupling, the derivation of relic abundance versus mass and T_reh, and the identification of viable regions provide useful benchmarks for assessing purely gravitational DM production. The sidetracked-attractor competition between enhanced oscillations and reduced inflationary scale is a nontrivial feature worth exploring further.

major comments (1)
  1. [Benchmark scenarios] Benchmark scenarios section: The central claim that negative field-space curvature 'can strongly enhance' post-inflationary Ricci oscillations and CGPP (up to an order of magnitude, especially at ξ=0) is demonstrated exclusively on the one-parameter family of Starobinsky+quadratic potentials that reach the sidetracked attractor on a hyperbolic manifold. No additional examples with different inflaton potentials or non-constant curvature radii are provided, so it remains unclear whether the amplification is generic to negative sectional curvature or tied to the specific slow-roll violation and quadratic-term coupling in this construction. This directly affects the support for the stated 'broader multifield mechanisms.'
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and relic abundance section] The abstract states that the conformal (ξ=1/6) case 'is much less constrained by isocurvature,' but the manuscript should explicitly quote the isocurvature bound used and show the corresponding exclusion curves for both couplings to make the comparison quantitative.
  2. Notation for the spectator mass m and the curvature radius of the hyperbolic manifold should be introduced with a single consistent symbol set early in the text to avoid reader confusion when comparing flat and curved cases.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for the constructive feedback. We address the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Benchmark scenarios] Benchmark scenarios section: The central claim that negative field-space curvature 'can strongly enhance' post-inflationary Ricci oscillations and CGPP (up to an order of magnitude, especially at ξ=0) is demonstrated exclusively on the one-parameter family of Starobinsky+quadratic potentials that reach the sidetracked attractor on a hyperbolic manifold. No additional examples with different inflaton potentials or non-constant curvature radii are provided, so it remains unclear whether the amplification is generic to negative sectional curvature or tied to the specific slow-roll violation and quadratic-term coupling in this construction. This directly affects the support for the stated 'broader multifield mechanisms.'

    Authors: We agree that the explicit numerical demonstration is limited to the one-parameter family of Starobinsky-plus-quadratic potentials on a hyperbolic manifold. The manuscript presents this setup as a concrete realization of broader multifield mechanisms and uses the phrasing 'can strongly enhance' to describe the effect that is shown in the calculations; it does not claim the enhancement is universal. To address the concern, we will revise the abstract, introduction, and conclusions to more explicitly qualify the scope of the results, clarify that the example illustrates a possible mechanism rather than establishing generality, and note that confirming the effect in other potentials or non-constant curvature would require additional work. This is a partial revision focused on language and framing. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in derivation; computations on explicit benchmarks are independent of target result

full rationale

The paper selects an explicit two-field potential (Starobinsky plus quadratic), constructs a one-parameter family of hyperbolic metrics that interpolate between flat and sidetracked regimes, solves the background equations, and numerically extracts the post-inflationary Ricci scalar oscillations and the resulting CGPP spectrum for a spectator field. These steps are standard forward calculations from the chosen Lagrangian; none of the reported enhancement, relic abundance, or viable parameter space is obtained by fitting a parameter to the final observable and then relabeling it a prediction. No self-citation is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or load-bearing premise, and the conformal-coupling case is handled by direct analogy to the Dirac equation without circular redefinition. The derivation chain is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract provides insufficient detail to identify specific free parameters, axioms, or invented entities used in the analysis.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5777 in / 1289 out tokens · 33246 ms · 2026-06-25T23:02:20.229871+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 50 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Constraints on Attractor Models of Inflation and Reheating from Planck, BICEP/Keck, ACT DR6, and SPT-3G Data,

    J. Ellis, M. A. G. Garcia, K. A. Olive, and S. Verner, “Constraints on Attractor Models of Inflation and Reheating from Planck, BICEP/Keck, ACT DR6, and SPT-3G Data,” arXiv:2510.18656 [hep-ph]. 39

    arXiv

  2. [2]

    Cosmic Inflation at the crossroads,

    J. Martin, C. Ringeval, and V. Vennin, “Cosmic Inflation at the crossroads,”JCAP07(2024) 087, arXiv:2404.10647 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2024

  3. [3]

    Baumann and L

    D. Baumann and L. McAllister,Inflation and String Theory. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 5, 2015.arXiv:1404.2601 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    String cosmology: From the early universe to today,

    M. Cicoli, J. P. Conlon, A. Maharana, S. Parameswaran, F. Quevedo, and I. Zavala, “String cosmology: From the early universe to today,”Phys. Rept.1059(2024) 1–155,arXiv:2303.04819 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2024

  5. [5]

    Quantized fields and particle creation in expanding universes. 1.,

    L. Parker, “Quantized fields and particle creation in expanding universes. 1.,”Phys. Rev.183 (1969) 1057–1068

    1969

  6. [6]

    Particle Production and Vacuum Polarization in an Anisotropic Gravitational Field,

    Y. B. Zel’dovich and A. A. Starobinsky, “Particle Production and Vacuum Polarization in an Anisotropic Gravitational Field,”Sov. Phys. JETP34no. 6, (1972) 1159–1166

    1972

  7. [7]

    Gravitational Particle Creation and Inflation,

    L. H. Ford, “Gravitational Particle Creation and Inflation,”Phys. Rev. D35(1987) 2955

    1987

  8. [8]

    Superheavy dark matter,

    D. J. H. Chung, E. W. Kolb, and A. Riotto, “Superheavy dark matter,”Phys. Rev. D59(1998) 023501,arXiv:hep-ph/9802238

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  9. [9]

    Nonthermal supermassive dark matter,

    D. J. H. Chung, E. W. Kolb, and A. Riotto, “Nonthermal supermassive dark matter,”Phys. Rev. Lett.81(1998) 4048–4051,arXiv:hep-ph/9805473

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  10. [10]

    Cosmological gravitational particle production and its implications for cosmological relics,

    E. W. Kolb and A. J. Long, “Cosmological gravitational particle production and its implications for cosmological relics,”Rev. Mod. Phys.96no. 4, (2024) 045005,arXiv:2312.09042 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2024

  11. [11]

    N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies,Quantum Fields in Curved Space. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 1982

    1982

  12. [12]

    L. E. Parker and D. Toms,Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime: Quantized Field and Gravity. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press, 8, 2009

    2009

  13. [13]

    On the Gravitational Production of Superheavy Dark Matter,

    D. J. H. Chung, P. Crotty, E. W. Kolb, and A. Riotto, “On the Gravitational Production of Superheavy Dark Matter,”Phys. Rev. D64(2001) 043503,arXiv:hep-ph/0104100

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  14. [14]

    WIMPzillas!,

    E. W. Kolb, D. J. H. Chung, and A. Riotto, “WIMPzillas!,”AIP Conf. Proc.484no. 1, (1999) 91–105,arXiv:hep-ph/9810361

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1999

  15. [15]

    Production of Purely Gravitational Dark Matter,

    Y. Ema, K. Nakayama, and Y. Tang, “Production of Purely Gravitational Dark Matter,”JHEP 09(2018) 135,arXiv:1804.07471 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  16. [16]

    Production of purely gravitational dark matter: the case of fermion and vector boson,

    Y. Ema, K. Nakayama, and Y. Tang, “Production of purely gravitational dark matter: the case of fermion and vector boson,”JHEP07(2019) 060,arXiv:1903.10973 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    Superheavy scalar dark matter from gravitational particle production in α-attractor models of inflation,

    S. Ling and A. J. Long, “Superheavy scalar dark matter from gravitational particle production in α-attractor models of inflation,”Phys. Rev. D103no. 10, (2021) 103532,arXiv:2101.11621 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2021

  18. [18]

    Scalar dark matter production from preheating and structure formation constraints,

    M. A. G. Garcia, M. Pierre, and S. Verner, “Scalar dark matter production from preheating and structure formation constraints,”Phys. Rev. D107no. 4, (2023) 043530,arXiv:2206.08940 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2023

  19. [19]

    Isocurvature constraints on scalar dark matter production from the inflaton,

    M. A. G. Garcia, M. Pierre, and S. Verner, “Isocurvature constraints on scalar dark matter production from the inflaton,”Phys. Rev. D107no. 12, (2023) 123508,arXiv:2303.07359 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    New window into gravitationally produced scalar dark 40 matter,

    M. A. G. Garcia, M. Pierre, and S. Verner, “New window into gravitationally produced scalar dark 40 matter,”Phys. Rev. D108no. 11, (2023) 115024,arXiv:2305.14446 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2023

  21. [21]

    Gravitational particle production of scalars: analytic and numerical approaches including early reheating,

    L. Jenks, E. W. Kolb, and K. Thyme, “Gravitational particle production of scalars: analytic and numerical approaches including early reheating,”JHEP05(2025) 077,arXiv:2410.03938 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  22. [22]

    Gravitational production of heavy particles during and after inflation,

    D. Racco, S. Verner, and W. Xue, “Gravitational production of heavy particles during and after inflation,”JHEP09(2024) 129,arXiv:2405.13883 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  23. [23]

    Nonminimal superheavy dark matter,

    S. Verner, “Nonminimal superheavy dark matter,”JCAP05(2025) 060,arXiv:2408.11889 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  24. [24]

    Gravitational Fermion Production in Inflationary Cosmology,

    D. J. H. Chung, L. L. Everett, H. Yoo, and P. Zhou, “Gravitational Fermion Production in Inflationary Cosmology,”Phys. Lett. B712(2012) 147–154,arXiv:1109.2524 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  25. [25]

    Vector Dark Matter from Inflationary Fluctuations,

    P. W. Graham, J. Mardon, and S. Rajendran, “Vector Dark Matter from Inflationary Fluctuations,”Phys. Rev. D93no. 10, (2016) 103520,arXiv:1504.02102 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  26. [26]

    Gravitational production of vector dark matter,

    A. Ahmed, B. Grzadkowski, and A. Socha, “Gravitational production of vector dark matter,” JHEP08(2020) 059,arXiv:2005.01766 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  27. [27]

    Completely dark photons from gravitational particle production during the inflationary era,

    E. W. Kolb and A. J. Long, “Completely dark photons from gravitational particle production during the inflationary era,”JHEP03(2021) 283,arXiv:2009.03828 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2021

  28. [28]

    Gravitational production of completely dark photons with nonminimal couplings to gravity,

    C. Capanelli, L. Jenks, E. W. Kolb, and E. McDonough, “Gravitational production of completely dark photons with nonminimal couplings to gravity,”JHEP09(2024) 071,arXiv:2405.19390 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2024

  29. [29]

    Cosmological gravitational particle production of massive spin-2 particles,

    E. W. Kolb, S. Ling, A. J. Long, and R. A. Rosen, “Cosmological gravitational particle production of massive spin-2 particles,”JHEP05(2023) 181,arXiv:2302.04390 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2023

  30. [30]

    Gravitational Production of Massive Spin-2 Particles During Reheating,

    S. Verner, “Gravitational Production of Massive Spin-2 Particles During Reheating,” arXiv:2512.19041 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  31. [31]

    Quantum interference in gravitational particle production,

    E. Basso, D. J. H. Chung, E. W. Kolb, and A. J. Long, “Quantum interference in gravitational particle production,”JHEP12(2022) 108,arXiv:2209.01713 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  32. [32]

    Multifield formulation of gravitational particle production after inflation,

    Y. Watanabe and J. White, “Multifield formulation of gravitational particle production after inflation,”Phys. Rev. D92(2015) 023504,arXiv:1503.08430 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  33. [33]

    Universality Class in Conformal Inflation,

    R. Kallosh and A. Linde, “Universality Class in Conformal Inflation,”JCAP07(2013) 002, arXiv:1306.5220 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  34. [34]

    Minimal Supergravity Models of Inflation,

    S. Ferrara, R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and M. Porrati, “Minimal Supergravity Models of Inflation,” Phys. Rev. D88no. 8, (2013) 085038,arXiv:1307.7696 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  35. [35]

    Unity of Cosmological Inflation Attractors,

    M. Galante, R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and D. Roest, “Unity of Cosmological Inflation Attractors,” Phys. Rev. Lett.114no. 14, (2015) 141302,arXiv:1412.3797 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  36. [36]

    De Sitter vs Quintessence in String Theory,

    M. Cicoli, S. De Alwis, A. Maharana, F. Muia, and F. Quevedo, “De Sitter vs Quintessence in String Theory,”Fortsch. Phys.67no. 1-2, (2019) 1800079,arXiv:1808.08967 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  37. [37]

    Completely dark matter from rapid-turn multifield inflation,

    E. W. Kolb, A. J. Long, E. McDonough, and G. Payeur, “Completely dark matter from rapid-turn multifield inflation,”JHEP02(2023) 181,arXiv:2211.14323 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2023

  38. [38]

    A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,

    A. A. Starobinsky, “A New Type of Isotropic Cosmological Models Without Singularity,”Phys. Lett. B91(1980) 99–102

    1980

  39. [39]

    Geometrical Destabilization of Inflation,

    S. Renaux-Petel and K. Turzyński, “Geometrical Destabilization of Inflation,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 117no. 14, (2016) 141301,arXiv:1510.01281 [astro-ph.CO]. 41

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  40. [40]

    Primordial fluctuations and non-Gaussianities in sidetracked inflation,

    S. Garcia-Saenz, S. Renaux-Petel, and J. Ronayne, “Primordial fluctuations and non-Gaussianities in sidetracked inflation,”JCAP07(2018) 057,arXiv:1804.11279 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  41. [41]

    Flattened non-Gaussianities from the effective field theory of inflation with imaginary speed of sound,

    S. Garcia-Saenz and S. Renaux-Petel, “Flattened non-Gaussianities from the effective field theory of inflation with imaginary speed of sound,”JCAP11(2018) 005,arXiv:1805.12563 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  42. [42]

    Superconformal Inflationaryα-Attractors,

    R. Kallosh, A. Linde, and D. Roest, “Superconformal Inflationaryα-Attractors,”JHEP11(2013) 198,arXiv:1311.0472 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  43. [43]

    Starobinsky-like Inflationary Models as Avatars of No-Scale Supergravity,

    J. Ellis, D. V. Nanopoulos, and K. A. Olive, “Starobinsky-like Inflationary Models as Avatars of No-Scale Supergravity,”JCAP10(2013) 009,arXiv:1307.3537 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  44. [44]

    Unified No-Scale Attractors,

    J. Ellis, D. V. Nanopoulos, K. A. Olive, and S. Verner, “Unified No-Scale Attractors,”JCAP09 (2019) 040,arXiv:1906.10176 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

  45. [45]

    BICEP/Keck constraints on attractor models of inflation and reheating,

    J. Ellis, M. A. G. Garcia, D. V. Nanopoulos, K. A. Olive, and S. Verner, “BICEP/Keck constraints on attractor models of inflation and reheating,”Phys. Rev. D105no. 4, (2022) 043504,arXiv:2112.04466 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2022

  46. [46]

    Isocurvature constraints on gravitationally produced superheavy dark matter,

    D. J. H. Chung, E. W. Kolb, A. Riotto, and L. Senatore, “Isocurvature constraints on gravitationally produced superheavy dark matter,”Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 023511, arXiv:astro-ph/0411468

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  47. [47]

    Conformal Transformations with Multiple Scalar Fields,

    D. I. Kaiser, “Conformal Transformations with Multiple Scalar Fields,”Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 084044,arXiv:1003.1159 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  48. [48]

    Multifield Dynamics of Higgs Inflation,

    R. N. Greenwood, D. I. Kaiser, and E. I. Sfakianakis, “Multifield Dynamics of Higgs Inflation,” Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 064021,arXiv:1210.8190 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  49. [49]

    Primordial Bispectrum from Multifield Inflation with Nonminimal Couplings,

    D. I. Kaiser, E. A. Mazenc, and E. I. Sfakianakis, “Primordial Bispectrum from Multifield Inflation with Nonminimal Couplings,”Phys. Rev. D87(2013) 064004,arXiv:1210.7487 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  50. [50]

    Multifield Inflation after Planck: Isocurvature Modes from Nonminimal Couplings,

    K. Schutz, E. I. Sfakianakis, and D. I. Kaiser, “Multifield Inflation after Planck: Isocurvature Modes from Nonminimal Couplings,”Phys. Rev. D89no. 6, (2014) 064044,arXiv:1310.8285 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  51. [51]

    A General analytic formula for the spectral index of the density perturbations produced during inflation,

    M. Sasaki and E. D. Stewart, “A General analytic formula for the spectral index of the density perturbations produced during inflation,”Prog. Theor. Phys.95(1996) 71–78, arXiv:astro-ph/9507001

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  52. [52]

    Adiabatic and entropy perturbations from inflation,

    C. Gordon, D. Wands, B. A. Bassett, and R. Maartens, “Adiabatic and entropy perturbations from inflation,”Phys. Rev. D63(2000) 023506,arXiv:astro-ph/0009131

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  53. [53]

    Scalar perturbations during multiple field slow-roll inflation,

    S. Groot Nibbelink and B. J. W. van Tent, “Scalar perturbations during multiple field slow-roll inflation,”Class. Quant. Grav.19(2002) 613–640,arXiv:hep-ph/0107272

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  54. [54]

    Curvature and isocurvature perturbations from two-field inflation in a slow-roll expansion,

    C. T. Byrnes and D. Wands, “Curvature and isocurvature perturbations from two-field inflation in a slow-roll expansion,”Phys. Rev. D74(2006) 043529,arXiv:astro-ph/0605679

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  55. [55]

    Curvature and isocurvature perturbations in two-field inflation,

    Z. Lalak, D. Langlois, S. Pokorski, and K. Turzynski, “Curvature and isocurvature perturbations in two-field inflation,”JCAP07(2007) 014,arXiv:0704.0212 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  56. [56]

    Testing Two-Field Inflation,

    C. M. Peterson and M. Tegmark, “Testing Two-Field Inflation,”Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 023522, arXiv:1005.4056 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  57. [57]

    Non-Gaussianity in Two-Field Inflation,

    C. M. Peterson and M. Tegmark, “Non-Gaussianity in Two-Field Inflation,”Phys. Rev. D84 (2011) 023520,arXiv:1011.6675 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  58. [58]

    A covariant approach to general field space metric in multi-field 42 inflation,

    J.-O. Gong and T. Tanaka, “A covariant approach to general field space metric in multi-field 42 inflation,”JCAP03(2011) 015,arXiv:1101.4809 [astro-ph.CO]. [Erratum: JCAP 02, E01 (2012)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  59. [59]

    Two-Field Analysis of No-Scale Supergravity Inflation,

    J. Ellis, M. A. G. García, D. V. Nanopoulos, and K. A. Olive, “Two-Field Analysis of No-Scale Supergravity Inflation,”JCAP01(2015) 010,arXiv:1409.8197 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  60. [60]

    Multiple field inflation,

    D. Wands, “Multiple field inflation,”Lect. Notes Phys.738(2008) 275–304, arXiv:astro-ph/0702187

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  61. [61]

    Cosmological perturbations,

    K. A. Malik and D. Wands, “Cosmological perturbations,”Phys. Rept.475(2009) 1–51, arXiv:0809.4944 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  62. [62]

    Multi-field inflation and cosmological perturbations,

    J.-O. Gong, “Multi-field inflation and cosmological perturbations,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. D26 no. 01, (2016) 1740003,arXiv:1606.06971 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  63. [63]

    How long before the end of inflation were observable perturbations produced?,

    A. R. Liddle and S. M. Leach, “How long before the end of inflation were observable perturbations produced?,”Phys. Rev. D68(2003) 103503,arXiv:astro-ph/0305263

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  64. [64]

    First CMB Constraints on the Inflationary Reheating Temperature,

    J. Martin and C. Ringeval, “First CMB Constraints on the Inflationary Reheating Temperature,” Phys. Rev. D82(2010) 023511,arXiv:1004.5525 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  65. [65]

    Large Scale Quantum Fluctuations in the Inflationary Universe,

    M. Sasaki, “Large Scale Quantum Fluctuations in the Inflationary Universe,”Prog. Theor. Phys. 76(1986) 1036

    1986

  66. [66]

    Quantum Theory of Gauge Invariant Cosmological Perturbations,

    V. F. Mukhanov, “Quantum Theory of Gauge Invariant Cosmological Perturbations,”Sov. Phys. JETP67(1988) 1297–1302

    1988

  67. [67]

    Correlated perturbations from inflation and the cosmic microwave background,

    L. Amendola, C. Gordon, D. Wands, and M. Sasaki, “Correlated perturbations from inflation and the cosmic microwave background,”Phys. Rev. Lett.88(2002) 211302,arXiv:astro-ph/0107089

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  68. [68]

    An Observational test of two-field inflation,

    D. Wands, N. Bartolo, S. Matarrese, and A. Riotto, “An Observational test of two-field inflation,” Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 043520,arXiv:astro-ph/0205253

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  69. [69]

    Nonminimal Couplings and the Forgotten Field of Axion Inflation,

    E. McDonough, A. H. Guth, and D. I. Kaiser, “Nonminimal Couplings and the Forgotten Field of Axion Inflation,”arXiv:2010.04179 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2010

  70. [70]

    Gauge Invariant Cosmological Perturbations,

    J. M. Bardeen, “Gauge Invariant Cosmological Perturbations,”Phys. Rev. D22(1980) 1882–1905

    1980

  71. [71]

    Theory of cosmological perturbations. Part 1. Classical perturbations. Part 2. Quantum theory of perturbations. Part 3. Extensions,

    V. F. Mukhanov, H. A. Feldman, and R. H. Brandenberger, “Theory of cosmological perturbations. Part 1. Classical perturbations. Part 2. Quantum theory of perturbations. Part 3. Extensions,”Phys. Rept.215(1992) 203–333

    1992

  72. [72]

    Chaotic Inflation,

    A. D. Linde, “Chaotic Inflation,”Phys. Lett. B129(1983) 177–181

    1983

  73. [73]

    Effective theories of single field inflation when heavy fields matter,

    A. Achucarro, J.-O. Gong, S. Hardeman, G. A. Palma, and S. P. Patil, “Effective theories of single field inflation when heavy fields matter,”JHEP05(2012) 066,arXiv:1201.6342 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  74. [74]

    Conditions for large non-Gaussianity in two-field slow-roll inflation,

    C. T. Byrnes, K.-Y. Choi, and L. M. H. Hall, “Conditions for large non-Gaussianity in two-field slow-roll inflation,”JCAP10(2008) 008,arXiv:0807.1101 [astro-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  75. [75]

    Hyperbolic Inflation,

    A. R. Brown, “Hyperbolic Inflation,”Phys. Rev. Lett.121no. 25, (2018) 251601, arXiv:1705.03023 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  76. [76]

    Mild Non-Gaussianities under Perturbative Control from Rapid-Turn Inflation Models,

    T. Bjorkmo, R. Z. Ferreira, and M. C. D. Marsh, “Mild Non-Gaussianities under Perturbative Control from Rapid-Turn Inflation Models,”JCAP12(2019) 036,arXiv:1908.11316 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2019

  77. [77]

    Rapid-turn inflation in supergravity is rare and tachyonic,

    V. Aragam, R. Chiovoloni, S. Paban, R. Rosati, and I. Zavala, “Rapid-turn inflation in supergravity is rare and tachyonic,”JCAP03no. 03, (2022) 002,arXiv:2110.05516 [hep-th]

    arXiv 2022

  78. [78]

    No-Scale Supergravity Realization of the Starobinsky Model of Inflation,

    J. Ellis, D. V. Nanopoulos, and K. A. Olive, “No-Scale Supergravity Realization of the Starobinsky Model of Inflation,”Phys. Rev. Lett.111(2013) 111301,arXiv:1305.1247 43 [hep-th]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 111, 129902 (2013)]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2013

  79. [79]

    Cosmological Attractors and Initial Conditions for Inflation,

    J. J. M. Carrasco, R. Kallosh, and A. Linde, “Cosmological Attractors and Initial Conditions for Inflation,”Phys. Rev. D92no. 6, (2015) 063519,arXiv:1506.00936 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  80. [80]

    Spectral distortions from promising single and multifield inflationary models,

    A. Baur, M. A. G. Garcia, R. Henriquez-Ortiz, M. Hernandez-Neri, and S. Ramos-Sanchez, “Spectral distortions from promising single and multifield inflationary models,”JCAP04(2024) 090,arXiv:2310.13071 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2024

Showing first 80 references.