Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

KorMedMCQA: Multi-Choice Question Answering Benchmark for Korean Healthcare Professional Licensing Examinations

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2403.01469 v3 pith:TVRF3RD2 submitted 2024-03-03 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords medicalbenchmarkskoreankormedmcqaansweringexaminationshealthcarelicensing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

We present KorMedMCQA, the first Korean Medical Multiple-Choice Question Answering benchmark, derived from professional healthcare licensing examinations conducted in Korea between 2012 and 2024. The dataset contains 7,469 questions from examinations for doctor, nurse, pharmacist, and dentist, covering a wide range of medical disciplines. We evaluate the performance of 59 large language models, spanning proprietary and open-source models, multilingual and Korean-specialized models, and those fine-tuned for clinical applications. Our results show that applying Chain of Thought (CoT) reasoning can enhance the model performance by up to 4.5% compared to direct answering approaches. We also investigate whether MedQA, one of the most widely used medical benchmarks derived from the U.S. Medical Licensing Examination, can serve as a reliable proxy for evaluating model performance in other regions-in this case, Korea. Our correlation analysis between model scores on KorMedMCQA and MedQA reveals that these two benchmarks align no better than benchmarks from entirely different domains (e.g., MedQA and MMLU-Pro). This finding underscores the substantial linguistic and clinical differences between Korean and U.S. medical contexts, reinforcing the need for region-specific medical QA benchmarks. To support ongoing research in Korean healthcare AI, we publicly release the KorMedMCQA via Huggingface.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. From KMMLU-Redux to KMMLU-Pro: A Professional Korean Benchmark Suite for LLM Evaluation

    cs.CL 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    KMMLU-Redux and KMMLU-Pro are new Korean benchmark datasets from national technical and professional licensure exams, with LLM evaluations reported against official pass thresholds.

  2. Expanding Foundational Language Capabilities in Open-Source LLMs through a Korean Case Study

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A 102B Korean-English model, expanded from Llama 3 70B with LlamaPro and Masked Structure Growth and trained on 194B tokens, scores 64.74 on KMMLU and 83.34 on KorMedMCQA, roughly matching GPT-4 on Korean benchmarks.

  3. MORE-CLEAR: Multimodal Offline Reinforcement learning for Clinical notes Leveraged Enhanced State Representation

    cs.LG 2025-08 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    A multimodal offline RL framework that fuses LLM-encoded clinical notes with structured vitals and labs modestly improves sepsis policy scores on some datasets, with evaluation caveats.

  4. BenchHub: A Unified Benchmark Suite for Holistic and Customizable LLM Evaluation

    cs.LG 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    BenchHub is an automatically categorized, customizable LLM benchmark suite covering 303K questions across 38 benchmarks in English and Korean.

Pith tools