Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

Unified Scaling Laws for Routed Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2202.01169 v2 pith:TWHPGD3K submitted 2022-02-02 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords modelsroutingscalingcountlanguagelawsparameterperformance
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The performance of a language model has been shown to be effectively modeled as a power-law in its parameter count. Here we study the scaling behaviors of Routing Networks: architectures that conditionally use only a subset of their parameters while processing an input. For these models, parameter count and computational requirement form two independent axes along which an increase leads to better performance. In this work we derive and justify scaling laws defined on these two variables which generalize those known for standard language models and describe the performance of a wide range of routing architectures trained via three different techniques. Afterwards we provide two applications of these laws: first deriving an Effective Parameter Count along which all models scale at the same rate, and then using the scaling coefficients to give a quantitative comparison of the three routing techniques considered. Our analysis derives from an extensive evaluation of Routing Networks across five orders of magnitude of size, including models with hundreds of experts and hundreds of billions of parameters.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Maximum Score Routing For Mixture-of-Experts

    cs.LG 2025-08 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    MaxScore casts MoE routing as min-cost max-flow with SoftTopk and claims better loss and eval scores at equal FLOPs; unverified because the full text is unreadable.

  2. Scaling Fine-Grained MoE Beyond 50B Parameters: Empirical Evaluation and Practical Insights

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    At 56B total parameters, fine-grained MoE with smaller, more numerous experts beats standard Switch and Mixtral-style MoE on validation loss and average downstream accuracy at matched FLOPs.

Pith tools