Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 44 references

Anomalous magnetic response in the Au-Al-Gd 1/1 quasicrystal approximant

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In Au-Al-Gd quasicrystal approximants, the largest magnetic entropy change appears in the antiferromagnetic region near the FM/AFM boundary, reaching about 7.2 J/K mol-Gd at 5 T.

desk verdict The experimental ΔSM map and the AFM-region enhancement are real and useful; the MFT-breakdown claim needs an exact mean-field benchmark before it can stand. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.00778 v1 pith:TYSS4MQU submitted 2025-06-01 cond-mat.mtrl-sci cond-mat.str-el

Takafumi D. Yamamoto , Tasuku Watanae , Farid Labib , Asuka Ishikawa , Shintaro Suzuki , Ryuji Tamura This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-scicond-mat.str-el
keywords quasicrystalapproximantTsai-typeAu-Al-Gdmagnetocaloriceffectmagneticentropychangemean-fieldbreakdowne/atuningantiferromagnetism
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that the magnetic entropy change in Au–Al–Gd 1/1 quasicrystal approximants is governed more by where the material sits in the magnetic phase diagram than by the mean-field scaling usually assumed for ferromagnets. By substituting Au for Al across a wide electron-per-atom range, the authors move the same crystal structure through spin-glass, ferromagnetic, and antiferromagnetic states and map the magnetocaloric response across all of them. They find the largest response, about $\Delta S_M^{\max}=7.2$ J/K mol-Gd for a 5 T field change, inside the antiferromagnetic region near the FM/AFM boundary, contrary to the usual expectation that ferromagnets give larger entropy changes. Within the ferromagnetic region the maximum entropy change is nearly independent of Curie temperature between 10 and 30 K, in conflict with the mean-field $T_C^{-2/3}$ law. If these results hold, tuning the magnetic ground state across a phase boundary becomes a practical design route for magnetic refrigeration materials.

What carries the argument

The central object is the electron-per-atom ratio $e/a$ as a continuous composition knob in the isostructural Tsai-type 1/1 approximant, combined with the thermodynamic Maxwell relation that converts field-cooled magnetization curves into the magnetic entropy change $\Delta S_M$. The comparison that exposes the anomaly is the mean-field expression $\Delta S_M^{\max}(T_C,\mu_0 H) = \tfrac{1}{2} C (C^2/K)^{2/3} (\mu_0 H/T_C)^{2/3}$, obtained from a Taylor expansion of the Brillouin function, which forces $T_C^{-2/3}$ scaling and a field exponent $n = 2/3$. The phase diagram of AFM, FM, and SG states as a function of $e/a$ is what lets $\Delta S_M^{\max}$ be tested in the same crystal structure across all magnetic ground states, and the Brillouin-function scaling relation is the identity whose failure near the phase boundaries carries the paper's claim.

What would settle it

Plot the field-cooled magnetization at $T_C$ for all ferromagnetic samples against $\mu_0 H/T_C$: if the data collapse onto one universal Brillouin-type curve, the claimed breakdown of mean-field theory is an artifact of the expansion's range, and the near-independence of $\Delta S_M^{\max}$ on $T_C$ would be saturation, not anomaly.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper claims that in the Tsai-type 1/1 Au–Al–Gd approximant the maximum magnetic entropy change $\Delta S_M^{\max}$ departs from mean-field behavior and is largest exactly where the mean-field picture fails. Across the ferromagnetic window $e/a = 1.60$–$1.86$, where $T_C$ runs from 10 to 30 K, $\Delta S_M^{\max}$ for a 5 T field change stays nearly flat instead of following the $T_C^{-2/3}$ law from Eq. (2), and the field exponent $n$ (0.65–0.88) moves away from the mean-field value $2/3$ as $e/a$ approaches either FM phase boundary. At the FM/AFM border the response increases toward the antiferromagnetic side under high fields, reaching about 7.2 J/K mol-Gd for a 5 T field change, about 1.4–1.9 times the values previously reported for Tsai-type approximants and comparable to candidate materials for low-temperature magnetic refrigeration. The paper interprets the effect as an anomalous high-field magnetic response, presumably tied to enhanced spin fluctuations near phase boundaries, and proposes that tuning the magnetic ground state across a phase boundary by electron concentration is a route to larger magnetocaloric responses in rare-earth intermetallics.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the mean-field formula used for comparison is accurate at the measured field and temperature values; if the Taylor expansion of the Brillouin function fails when 5 T is large relative to a 10 K Curie temperature, the flat $T_C$ dependence could be a saturation effect rather than a true breakdown of mean-field theory.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claim is right, replacing Au by Al (or vice versa) to move $e/a$ toward the FM/AFM boundary can raise the magnetocaloric response of Tsai-type approximants to levels competitive with established low-temperature refrigerants near 10 K.
  • Mean-field scaling laws such as $\Delta S_M^{\max} \propto T_C^{-2/3}$ are not reliable design rules near magnetic phase boundaries, so composition-dependent measurements are needed instead of extrapolating from one Curie temperature.
  • Antiferromagnetic compounds near a FM/AFM boundary should not be excluded as magnetocaloric candidates at high fields, because their entropy change can exceed that of ferromagnets of the same rare earth at the same field.
  • If $e/a$ tuning works through RKKY interactions generally, other rare-earth intermetallic systems with adjustable electron count can be pushed toward a magnetic phase boundary to enhance their $\Delta S_M$.
  • The comprehensive $\Delta S_M$ map identifies the $e/a$ windows worth optimizing for cooling applications in related approximants and quasicrystals.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: a direct test of the proposed spin-fluctuation origin would be to measure the NMR relaxation rate or specific heat across the same $e/a$ range and check that fluctuations intensify near the FM/AFM and FM/SG borders.
  • Beyond the paper: the high-field enhancement in the AFM region is likely connected to the metamagnetic transition near 0.5 T observed at 2 K; measuring $\Delta S_M$ through that transition at several temperatures could separate the forced-ferromagnetic contribution from the anomalous boundary effect.
  • Beyond the paper: applying the same analysis to Au–Al–Tb or Au–Al–Dy approximants, or to 2/1 approximants, would test whether the enhancement is generic to Tsai-type compounds or specific to the Gd system.
  • Beyond the paper: the nearly flat $\Delta S_M^{\max}$ versus $T_C$ trend suggests that at fixed field the working temperature of a refrigerant could be shifted by composition without sacrificing entropy change, which is useful for matching a specific cooling load.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports magnetization measurements on polycrystalline AuxAl86-xGd14 (x = 51–73) Tsai-type 1/1 approximant crystals, constructs a magnetic phase diagram versus electron-per-atom ratio e/a, and uses the Maxwell relation to compute the magnetic entropy change ΔSM across the spin-glass (SG), ferromagnetic (FM), and antiferromagnetic (AFM) regions. The central experimental results are a comprehensive ΔSM map over e/a = 1.54–1.98, a nearly T_C-independent maximum entropy change ΔSMmax within the FM region (T_C ≈ 10–30 K), and an enhanced ΔSMmax of about 7.2 J/K mol-Gd under a 5 T field change in the AFM region near the FM/AFM boundary. The authors interpret these observations as evidence for a breakdown of mean-field theory (MFT) near the FM phase boundaries and propose tuning the magnetic ground state across a phase boundary as a route to improved magnetocaloric performance.

Significance. If the conclusions hold, the paper would provide a valuable design principle for magnetocaloric materials in Tsai-type approximants and potentially in rare-earth intermetallics more broadly. The comprehensive ΔSM map across an isostructural series with continuously varying ground state is original and experimentally demanding, and the reported high ΔSMmax in an AFM region under high fields is an interesting falsifiable claim. Credit is also due for using the Maxwell relation on directly measured M-T data and for presenting the field and temperature dependences systematically. However, the theoretical interpretation rests on a comparison with a low-field Taylor expansion of the Brillouin function, and the manuscript does not yet establish that the observed deviations are genuine MFT breakdowns rather than finite-field effects. With an exact mean-field benchmark, error estimates, and a more transparent comparison, the central claim could become convincing.

major comments (3)
  1. [§III, Eq. (2), Fig. 5(a)] The central MFT-breakdown claim rests on Eq. (2), which is a small-argument Taylor expansion of the Brillouin function. For Gd3+ (J = 7/2, g = 2), the Brillouin-function argument is x = gJ μB H / (kB T) with gJ = 7, giving x ≈ 2.35 for μ0H = 5 T and T_C ≈ 10 K, and x ≈ 0.78 for T_C ≈ 30 K. The upper end is far outside the small-x regime where Eq. (2) is valid. The assertion in the text that the discrepancy 'cannot be attributed to the approximation used in deriving Eq. (2)' is therefore unsupported: at these x values, a failure of the Taylor expansion is not distinguishable from a true breakdown of MFT. The authors should replace Eq. (2) with the numerical solution of the Weiss molecular-field equations for J = 7/2 at each measured T_C and compute ΔSmax from the full Brillouin function; only then can the observed flat T_C dependence be attributed to a breakdown of MFT.
  2. [Fig. 5(a), Fig. 6, Fig. S5] No error bars or uncertainty estimates are provided for ΔSmax, T_C, or the exponent n. The claim that ΔSmax is 'almost independent' of T_C over 10–30 K and that n deviates systematically from the mean-field value n = 2/3 is not quantitatively supported without such uncertainties. The reported n values are 0.62–0.71 in the central FM region, with only the two border compositions giving n = 0.85 and 0.88; within experimental uncertainty this could be consistent with a constant n ≈ 2/3. The authors should propagate uncertainties from magnetization noise, field and temperature calibration, and the numerical integration in Eq. (1), and show that the flatness and exponent deviations are statistically significant.
  3. [§III, Fig. S5] The field exponent n is obtained by fitting |ΔSmax| = A (μ0H)^n over the entire 0–5 T range, but Eq. (2) is a low-field asymptotic law. Fitting a power law across the full field range mixes the low-field and high-field regimes, so the extracted n is not a direct test of the MFT prediction away from the low-field limit. An exact MFT calculation of ΔSmax(H,T_C) would provide the proper benchmark for both the T_C dependence and the field dependence, and would clarify whether the observed exponent variation near the phase boundaries is anomalous or simply a finite-field effect.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] In the abstract, 'a n effective strategy' contains a typo and should read 'an effective strategy'.
  2. [Eq. (1) and Fig. 4] The Maxwell relation in Eq. (1) is written symbolically; the manuscript should state that the integration was performed numerically and give the magnetic-field step size or the number of field points used, since the accuracy of ΔSM depends on the discretization.
  3. [Fig. 5(a)] The solid line representing the MFT prediction in Fig. 5(a) is not described with explicit parameters; the definitions of C and K in Eq. (2) and the prefactor used to draw the line should be reported so the reader can verify the normalization.
  4. [Table S1 and Fig. 3] The e/a values used for the phase diagram and ΔSM map should state whether they are computed from nominal or analyzed compositions; Table S1 shows analyzed compositions differing by up to about 4 at.% from nominal, so an error estimate on e/a should be included.
  5. [§III, Fig. 6] The statement that 7.2 J/K mol-Gd is the highest ΔSM ever reported in Tsai-type compounds should be qualified as 'to the authors' knowledge' and should specify the comparison conditions (field variation, temperature range, and normalization per mole of Gd), since literature values are often quoted under different field amplitudes and units.
  6. [Fig. 2(d) and Fig. 6] The inset of Fig. 2(d) shows a metamagnetic anomaly near 0.5 T at 2 K for x = 73. The manuscript should clarify whether the same metamagnetic transition is present in the AFM samples (e/a = 1.54–1.57) that contribute to the high-field ΔSmax enhancement, and whether the transition temperature or field changes with e/a.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the entropy-change data are computed from measured magnetization and the mean-field comparison is an external theoretical benchmark.

full rationale

The paper's central ΔSM values are obtained from measured magnetization curves through the standard Maxwell relation, Eq. (1), which is an external benchmark independent of the claims being tested. The mean-field reference, Eq. (2), is quoted from Belo et al. [34] and is used as a theoretical prediction; no parameter of Eq. (2) is fitted to the measured ΔSM data. The field-exponent n is fitted to the measured |ΔSM| versus H curves, but it is reported as an observed quantity and compared with the theoretical value n = 2/3, not relabeled as a prediction derived from the theory. The magnetic phase diagram is determined in this paper from its own M-T and M-H data (Fig. 2), with the earlier report [8] cited only as corroboration, so the cited phase diagram is not load-bearing. The enhancement of ΔSM near the FM/AFM boundary is a direct reading of the measured ΔSM map and does not reduce to a fit or a self-citation. The only substantive weakness is whether the Taylor expansion used in deriving Eq. (2) is valid at the experimental μ0H/TC values; that is a correctness/validity concern about the mean-field benchmark, not a circularity, because the theoretical curve is not constructed from the data it is used to test. No equation in the paper is equivalent to its input by construction, and no prediction is statistically forced by a fitted parameter.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The main experimental result is a direct measurement, so no invented entities are introduced. The free parameters are the fitted field-exponent n and prefactor A used to characterize the FM samples. The axioms are standard materials-science conventions (valence assignment for e/a, single-phase assumption) and the applicability of the mean-field benchmark.

free parameters (2)
  • field exponent n = 0.62-0.88 across e/a = 1.60-1.86
    Fitted to |DeltaSMmax| = A (mu0 H)^n in Supplemental Fig. S5; used to claim deviation from the mean-field value n = 2/3.
  • prefactor A = not reported
    Also fitted in the power-law relation for DeltaSMmax versus field, but its values are not tabulated in the main text.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Au is monovalent and Al and Gd are trivalent when computing the electron-per-atom ratio.
    Used to map nominal compositions to e/a values in Fig. 3 and throughout; valency assignment is conventional for these alloys but not directly measured.
  • domain assumption The Maxwell relation applied to field-cooled M-T curves gives the thermodynamic magnetic entropy change.
    Standard technique, but assumes equilibrium and proper field history; no correction for irreversible effects or demagnetizing fields is discussed.
  • domain assumption The powder samples are single-phase and compositionally homogeneous as indicated by XRD and SEM-EDX.
    Phase identification rests on bulk powder XRD and a few SEM-EDX points; spatial homogeneity across each sample is not mapped.
  • domain assumption The mean-field expression Eq. (2) from Ref. [34] is applicable at the measured H/TC values.
    The paper uses the TC^{-2/3} scaling to diagnose MFT breakdown, but the Taylor expansion may lose validity at high fields relative to TC.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Anomalous magnetic response in the Au-Al-Gd 1/1 quasicrystal approximant." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/TYSS4MQU

@misc{pith2026250600778,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Anomalous magnetic response in the Au-Al-Gd 1/1 quasicrystal approximant},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/TYSS4MQU}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.00778}
}
abstract

The magnetic response of the Tsai-type 1/1 Au-Al-Gd approximant crystals (ACs) was quantitatively investigated in terms of the magnetic entropy change ($\Delta S_{M}$) for different magnetic ground states. A comprehensive $\Delta S_{M}$ map over a wide electron concentration range has been established, demonstrating the detailed variation of $\Delta S_{M}$ across the entire magnetic phase diagram in the Tsai-type 1/1 ACs. Near the boundaries of the ferromagnetic (FM) phase, a clear deviation from the mean-field theory (MFT) was observed in both the Curie temperature ($T_{C}$) and magnetic field ($H$) dependences of the maximum magnetic entropy change ($\Delta S_{M}^{max}$). Contrary to general expectations, a high $\Delta S_{M}^{max}$ (7.2 J/K mol-Gd under a 5 T field variation), even comparable to those of candidate materials for low-temperature magnetic refrigeration, was obtained within the antiferromagnetic (AFM) region near the FM / AFM phase boundary. The unexpected enhancement of $\Delta S_{M}^{max}$ toward the AFM region under high magnetic fields indicates an anomalous magnetic response in the present Tsai-type 1/1 AC, which is presumably associated with the breakdown of the MFT. The present finding suggests that tuning the magnetic ground state across the phase boundary is an effective strategy to enhance $\Delta S_{M}$, even in general rare-earth intermetallic compounds.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Tamura, Y

    R. Tamura, Y . Muro, T. Hiroto, K. Nishimoto, and T. Takabatake, Long-range magnetic order in the quasicrystalline approximant Cd6Tb, Phys. Rev. B 82, 220201(R) (2010)

    work page 2010

  2. [2]

    Tamura, Y

    R. Tamura, Y . Muro, T. Hiroto, H. Yaguchi, G. Beutier, and T. Takabatake, Structural and magnetic transitions in the crystalline approximant Cd6Sm, Phys. Rev. B 85, 014203 (2012)

    work page 2012

  3. [3]

    A. Mori, H. Ota, S. Yoshiuchi, K. Iwakawa, Y . Taga, Y . Hirose, T. Takeuchi, E. Yamamoto, Y . Haga, F. Honda, R. Settai, and Y . Ōnuki, Electrical and Magnetic Properties of Quasicrystal Approximants RCd6 (R: Rare Earth), J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 81, 024720 (2012)

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    Hiroto, G

    T. Hiroto, G. H. Gebresenbut, C. P . Gómez, Y . Muro, M. Isobe, Y . Ueda, K. Tokiwa, and R. Tamura, Ferromagnetism and re-entrant spin-glass transition in quasicrystal approximants Au–SM–Gd (SM = Si, Ge), J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 25, 426004 (2013)

    work page 2013

  5. [5]

    Koželj, S

    P . Koželj, S. Jazbec, S. Vrtnik, A. Jelen, J. Dolinšek, M. Jagodič, Z. Jagličič, P . Boulet, M. C. de Weerd, J. Ledieu, J. M. Dubois, and V . Fournée, Geometrically frustrated magnetism of spins on icosahedral clusters: The Gd3Au13Sn4 quasicrystal approximant, Phys. Rev. B 88, 214202 (2013)

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    Hiroto, K

    T. Hiroto, K. Tokiwa, and R. Tamura, Sign of canted ferromagnetism in the quasicrystal approximants Au-SM- R (SM = Si, Ge and Sn / R = Tb, Dy and Ho), J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 26, 216004 (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [7]

    Ishikawa, T

    A. Ishikawa, T. Hiroto, K. Tokiwa, T. Fujii, and R. Tamura, Composition-driven spin glass to ferromagnetic transition in the quasicrystal approximant Au-Al-Gd, Phys. Rev. B 93, 024416 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Ishikawa, T

    A. Ishikawa, T. Fujii, T. Takeuchi, T. Yamada, Y . Matsushita, and R. Tamura, Antiferromagnetic order is possible in ternary quasicrystal approximants, Phys. Rev. B 98, 220403 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    Yoshida, S

    S. Yoshida, S. Suzuki, T. Yamada, T. Fujii, A. Ishikawa, and R. Tamura, Antiferromagnetic order survives in the high-order quasicrystal approximant, Phys. Rev. B 100, 180409(R) (2019)

    2019

  2. [10]

    Y . G. So, K. Takagi, and T. J. Sato, Formation and magnetic properties of Gd–Pd–Tb 2/1 approximant, J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 1458, 012003 (2020)

    2020

  3. [11]

    Inagaki, S

    K. Inagaki, S. Suzuki, A. Ishikawa, T. Tsugawa, F. Aya, T. Yamada, K. Tokiwa, T. Takeuchi, and R. Tamura, Ferromagnetic 2/1 quasicrystal approximants, Phys. Rev. B 101, 180405(R) (2020). 7

    2020

  4. [12]

    Labib, H

    F. Labib, H. Takakura, A. Ishikawa, T. Fujii, and R. Tamura, Derivation of a Non -Stoichiometric 1/1 Quasicrystal Approximant from a Stoichiometric 2/1 Quasicrystal Approximant and Maximization of Magnetocaloric Effect, Under Review (2025)

    2025

  5. [13]

    Tamura, A

    R. Tamura, A. Ishikawa, S. Suzuki, T. Kotajima, Y . Tanaka, T. Seki, N. Shibata, T. Yamada, T. Fujii, C.-W. Wang, M. Avdeev, K. Nawa, D. Okuyama, and T. J. Sato, Experimental Observation of Long-Range Magnetic Order in Icosahedral Quasicrystals, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 19938 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    Takeuchi, F

    R. Takeuchi, F. Labib, T. Tsugawa, Y . Akai, A. Ishikawa, S. Suzuki, T. Fujii, and R. Tamura, High Phase- Purity and Composition-Tunable Ferromagnetic Icosahedral Quasicrystal, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 176701 (2023)

    2023

  7. [15]

    Tamura et al., Observation of antiferromagnetic order in a quasicrystal, Nat

    R. Tamura et al., Observation of antiferromagnetic order in a quasicrystal, Nat. Phys. (2025), DOI: 10.1038/s41567-025-02858-0

    2025 doi

  8. [16]

    See Supplemental Material at [URL] for crystal structure of Tsai-type 1/1 AC, sample characterization, iso- field magnetization curves at various magnetic fields, and magnetic field dependence of the maximum magnetic entropy change

  9. [17]

    Suzuki, A

    S. Suzuki, A. Ishikawa, T. Yamada, T. Sugimoto, A. Sakurai, and R. Tamura, Magnetism of Tsai-Type Quasicrystal Approximants, Mater. Trans. 62, 298 (2021)

    2021

  10. [18]

    Labib, S

    F. Labib, S. Suzuki, A. Ishikawa, T. Fujii, and R. Tamura, Emergence of long-range magnetic order from spin-glass state by tuning electron density in a stoichiometric Ga-based quasicrystal approximant, Phys. Rev. B 106, 174436 (2022)

    2022

  11. [19]

    Labib, K

    F. Labib, K. Nawa, S. Suzuki, H.-C. Wu, A. Ishikawa, K. Inagaki, T. Fujii, K. Kinjo, T. J. Sato, R. Tamura, Unveiling exotic magnetic phase diagram of a non-Heisenberg quasicrystal approximant, Mater. Today Phys. 40, 101321 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    T. J. Sato, A. Ishikawa, A. Sakurai, M. Hattori, M. Avdeev, and R. Tamura, Whirling spin order in the quasicrystal approximant Au72Al14Tb14, Phys. Rev. B 100, 054417 (2019)

    2019

  13. [21]

    Hiroto, T

    T. Hiroto, T. J. Sato, H. Cao, T. Hawai, T. Yokoo, S. Itoh, and R. Tamura, Noncoplanar ferrimagnetism and local crystalline-electric-field anisotropy in the quasicrystal approximant Au70Si17Tb13, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 32, 415802 (2020)

    2020

  14. [22]

    G. H. Gebresenbut, T. Shiino, M. S. Andersson, N. Qureshi, O. Fabelo, P . Beran, D. Qvarngârd, P . Henelius, A. Rydh, R. Mathieu, P . Nordblad, and C. P . Gomez, Effect of pseudo-Tsai cluster incorporation on the magnetic structures of R-Au-Si (R = Tb, Ho) quasicrystal approxi...

    2022

  15. [23]

    K. Nawa, M. Avdeev, A. Ishikawa, H. Takakura, C.-W. Wang, D. Okuyama, R. Murasaki, R. Tamura, and T. J. Sato, Magnetic properties of the quasicrystal approximant Au65Ga21Tb14, Phys. Rev. Mater. 7, 054412 (2023)

    2023

  16. [24]

    Labib, K

    F. Labib, K. Nawa, Y . Nambu, H. Takakura, Y . Ikeda, K. Deguchi, M. Matsuura, A. Ishikawa, R. Kajimoto, K. Ikeuchi, T. J. Sato, and R. Tamura, Universal whirling magnetic orders in non -Heisenberg Tsai-type quasicrystal approximants, arXiv: 2503.01517 (2025)

    2025

  17. [25]

    Kikugawa, T

    N. Kikugawa, T. Hiroto, A. Ishikawa, S. Suzuki, H. Sakurai, and R. Tamura, Magnetocaloric effect in ferromagnetic 1/1 quasicrystal approximants Au64Al22R14 (R = Gd, Tb, and Dy), J. Alloys Compd. 882, 160669 (2021). 8

    2021

  18. [26]

    Miyazaki, T

    H. Miyazaki, T. Sugimoto, K. Morita, and T. Tohyama, Magnetic orders induced by RKKY interaction in Tsai-type quasicrystalline approximant Au-Al-Gd, Phys. Rev. Mater. 4, 024417 (2020)

    2020

  19. [27]

    Y . -C. Huang, U. Häussermann, G. H. Gebresenbut, F. Denoel, and C. P . Gómez, Structural Analysis of the Gd–Au–Al Quasicrystal Approximant Phase across Its Composition-Driven Magnetic Property Changes, Inorg. Chem. 62, 14668 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Sugimoto, S

    T. Sugimoto, S. Suzuki, R. Tamura, and T. Tohyama, Revisiting the Magnetic Orders in Heisenberg Model for Tsai-Type Quasicrystal Approximant, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 93, 045001 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    Labib, T

    F. Labib, T. Sugimoto, H. Takakura, A. Ishikawa, and R. Tamura, Identification of Two Distinct Antiferromagnetic Phases in the Au-Al-Gd Quasicrystal Approximant, Phys. Rev. B 111, 174409 (2025)

    2025

  22. [30]

    J. A. Mydosh, Spin glasses: redux: an updated experimental/materials survey, Rep. Prog. Phys. 78, 052501 (2015)

    2015

  23. [31]

    K. A. Gschneidner Jr., V . K. Pecharsky, and A. O. Tsokol, Recent developments in magnetocaloric materials, Rep. Prog. Phys. 68, 1479 (2005)

    2005

  24. [32]

    Franco, J

    V . Franco, J. S. Blázquez, J. J. Ipus, J. Y . Law, L. M. Moreno-Ramírez, and A. Conde, Magnetocaloric effect: From materials research to refrigeration devices, Prog. Mater. Sci. 93, 112 (2018)

    2018

  25. [33]

    W. Liu, E. Bykov, S. Taskaev, M. Bogush, V . Khovaylo, N. Fortunato, A. Aubert, H. Zhang, T. Gottschall, J. Wosnitza, F. Scheibel, K. Skokov, and O. Gutfleisch, A study on rare -earth Laves phases for magnetocaloric liquefaction of hydrogen, Appl. Mater. Today 29, 101624 (2022)

    2022

  26. [34]

    J. H. Belo, J. A. Amaral, A. M. Pereira, V . S. Amaral, and J. P . Araújo, On the Curie temperature dependency of the magnetocaloric effect, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 242407 (2012)

    2012

  27. [35]

    Shiino, G

    T. Shiino, G. H. Gebresenbut, C. P . Gómez, U. Häussermann, P . Nordblad, A. Rydh, and R. Mathieu, Examination of the critical behavior and magnetocaloric effect of the ferromagnetic Gd -Au-Si quasicrystal approximants, Phys. Rev. B 106, 174405 (2022)

    2022

  28. [36]

    Labib, T

    F. Labib, T. D. Yamamoto, A. Ishikawa, and R. Tamura, Comparative study of ferromagnetism in non - Heisenberg 1/1 and 2/1 quasicrystal approximants, Phys. Rev. B 109, 174429 (2024)

    2024

  29. [37]

    P . B. de Castro, K. Terashima, T. D. Yamamoto, Z. Hou, S. Iwasaki, R. Matumoto, S. Adachi, Y . Saito, P . Song, H. Takeya, and Y . Takano, Machine-learning-guided discovery of the gigantic magnetocaloric effect in HoB2 near the hydrogen liquefaction temperature, NPG Asia Mate...

    2020

  30. [38]

    W. Zuo, F. Hu, J. S un, B. Shen, Large reversible magnetocaloric effect in RMn2 (R = Tb, Dy, Ho, Er) compounds, J. Alloys Compd. 575, 162 (2013)

    2013

  31. [39]

    L. Li, Y . Y uan, Y . Zhang, T. Namiki, K. Nishimura, R. Pöttgen, S. Zhou, Giant low field magnetocaloric effect and field-induced metamagnetic transition in TmZn, Appl. Phys. Lett. 107, 132401 (2015)

    2015

  32. [40]

    Kurian, M

    J. Kurian, M. R. Rahul, J. Arout Chelvane, A. V . Morozkin, A. K. Nigam, G. Phanikumar, R. Nirmala , Enhanced magnetocaloric effect in undercooled rare earth intermetallic compounds RNi (R = Gd, Ho, and Er), J. Magn. Magn. 499, 166302 (2020)

    2020

  33. [41]

    W. Liu, T. Gottschall, F. Scheibel, E. Bykov, A. Aubert, N. Fortunato, B. Beckmann, A. M. Döring, H. Zhang, K. Skokov, O. Gutfleisch, A matter of performance and criticality: A review of rare-earth-based magnetocaloric intermetallic compounds for hydrogen liquefaction, J. Allo...

    2024

  34. [42]

    E. Z. V aliev, Entropy and Magnetocaloric Effect in Ferromagnets and Antiferromagnets, Phys. Met. Metallogr. 104, 8 (2007)

    2007

  35. [43]

    P . J. Ranke, N. A. Oliveira, B. P . Alho, E. J. R. Plaza, V . S. R. Sousa, L. Caron, and M. S. Reis, Understanding the inverse magnetocaloric effect in antiferro - and ferrimagnetic arrangements, J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 21, 056004 (2009)

    2009

  36. [44]

    Tamura, S

    R. Tamura, S. Tanaka, T. Ohno, and H. Kitazawa, Magnetic ordered structure dependence of magnetic refrigeration efficiency, J. Appl. Phys. 116, 053908 (2014). 10 AuxAl86-xGd14 x = 73.0 72.5 72.0 71.5 70 68 66 62 58 57 56 53 51 Intensity (arb. units) 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2 (de...

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.