Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Analyzing the Stance of Facebook Posts on Abortion Considering State-level Health and Social Compositions

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2305.09889 v1 pith:U3EJ4GKK submitted 2023-05-17 cs.SI

classification cs.SI
keywords abortionhealthstatespostsstancestatewomenespecially
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Abortion remains one of the most controversial topics, especially after overturning Roe v. Wade ruling in the United States. Previous literature showed that the illegality of abortion could have serious consequences, as women might seek unsafe pregnancy terminations leading to increased maternal mortality rates and negative effects on their reproductive health. Therefore, the stances of the abortion-related Facebook posts were analyzed at the state level in the United States from May 4 until June 30, 2022, right after the Supreme Court's decision was disclosed. In more detail, the pre-trained Transformer architecture-based model was fine-tuned on a manually labeled training set to obtain a stance detection model suitable for the collected dataset. Afterward, we employed appropriate statistical tests to examine the relationships between public opinion regarding abortion, abortion legality, political leaning, and factors measuring the overall population's health, health knowledge, and vulnerability per state. We found that states with a higher number of views against abortion also have higher infant and maternal mortality rates. Furthermore, the stance of social media posts per state is mostly matching with the current abortion laws in these states. While aligned with existing literature, these findings indicate how public opinion, laws, and women's and infants' health are related, and interventions are required to educate and protect women, especially in vulnerable populations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Learning Instruction-Following Policies through Open-Ended Instruction Relabeling with Large Language Models

    cs.LG 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    OIR relabels failed trajectories via an LLM into open-ended instructions and trains a unified instruction-following policy, outperforming PQN and ELLM on Craftax.

Pith tools