Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

The story around the first 4n signal

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2405.14884 v1 pith:U7PIYGFX submitted 2024-04-16 physics.soc-ph nucl-exnucl-th

classification physics.soc-phnucl-exnucl-th
keywords researcharoundbasiccampaigneventsfirstsignalthey
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

The GANIL campaign around the first 4n signal was very peculiar. The beginning and end were both dictated by unexpected events that, unfortunately, do not fit within the streamlined format of standard scientific publications. However, they illustrate many aspects of how basic research should work, or at least does work. Therefore, I take this opportunity to share them with those not involved in the campaign, hoping that they will offer a better perspective of that research in particular and of basic research in general. As a disclaimer, this is only a personal recollection of those events.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Recent Results on the Tetraneutron

    nucl-ex 2025-06 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    The authors reconcile conflicting tetraneutron reports by proposing that different experiments populated a bound ground state and an unbound first excited state of four neutrons.

Pith tools