Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 79 references

Mobility rings in a non-Hermitian non-Abelian quasiperiodic lattice

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-06 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Mobility edges form exact circles in a non-Abelian quasiperiodic chain.

desk verdict A plausible mobility-ring claim in a non-Abelian non-Hermitian AA chain, with suggestive numerics but an analytic expression that is conjectured rather than proven. read the letter →

arxiv 2507.12176 v1 pith:UBUCJOOK submitted 2025-07-16 quant-ph cond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.quant-gas

Rui-Jie Chen , Guo-Qing Zhang , Zhi Li , Dan-Wei Zhang This is my paper · ORCID
classification quant-phcond-mat.dis-nncond-mat.mes-hallcond-mat.quant-gas
keywords non-HermitianAubry-AndrémodelmobilityringedgeAndersonlocalizationnon-Abeliangaugefieldskineffectspectralwindingnumberquasiperiodiclattice
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper studies a one-dimensional non-reciprocal Aubry-André chain of spin-1/2 particles with SU(2) non-Abelian synthetic gauge fields, and claims that these fields change the localization phase diagram in a distinct way. In the Abelian limit, the Anderson localization transition coincides with the real-to-complex spectral transition, and no mobility edges appear. When both hopping phases are non-Abelian, the paper shows that the localization transition instead coincides with a change of spectral winding, and that the boundary between extended and localized eigenstates is a circle in the complex energy plane, a so-called mobility ring. The paper derives the exact equation of this circle from the non-Bloch spectrum and verifies it numerically through the inverse participation ratio, winding numbers, and wave-function profiles. If correct, this gives an analytically controlled example of a mobility edge in a non-Hermitian quasiperiodic system with internal degrees of freedom and gauge structure.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the mobility ring, a closed curve in the complex energy plane that separates extended from localized eigenstates, analogous to a mobility edge but for complex energies. The paper constructs it from the non-Bloch band theory of the clean non-Hermitian lattice. The eigenenergy formula $E(\beta)=J_l\cos\theta_l\,\beta + J_r\cos\theta_r\,\beta^{-1} \pm i\sqrt{J_l^2\sin^2\theta_l\,\beta^2 + J_r^2\sin^2\theta_r\,\beta^{-2}}$ is evaluated on the generalized Brillouin zone; requiring the extended-state condition $|\beta|=1$ gives the circle $x^2+y^2=|E(\beta_c)|^2$. The ring is also the boundary between spectral sectors with opposite winding numbers, which is what allows it to be computed exactly and to separate states with different localization and skin behavior.

What would settle it

Directly compute the fractal dimension $\Gamma$ of every eigenstate for a parameter set with $V/J$ between the two critical values and angles not used in the paper, such as $\theta_l=-1.0$ and $\theta_r=1.2$, and check whether the circle from Eq. (8) still separates $\Gamma\approx1$ from $\Gamma\approx0$ states; a single eigenstate crossing the circle without changing its localization would falsify the exactness of the ring expression.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in a nonreciprocal Aubry-André chain with imbalanced non-Abelian hopping, the mobility edges, the critical complex energies separating Anderson-localized from extended eigenstates, form a ring structure in the complex energy plane. The paper derives the ring from the clean-limit non-Bloch dispersion: extended states correspond to $|\beta|=1$ on the generalized Brillouin zone, and inserting this condition into $E(\beta)$ yields the circle $x^2+y^2=|E(\beta_c)|^2$. The ring coincides with the boundary between the two spectral winding sectors: inside the ring the spectrum retains point-gap topology with nonzero winding, while outside it the winding vanishes and states are localized. The paper verifies this picture with exact diagonalization for lattice sizes up to $L=987$, showing that the inverse participation ratio transitions at two critical quasiperiodic strengths match the inner and outer edges of the ring, and that under open boundary conditions the ring separates left skin modes, right skin modes, and Anderson-localized modes.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that the quasiperiodic potential does not shift the boundary between the two spectral winding sectors, so the mobility ring can be read off from the clean-limit spectrum at $|\beta|=1$; this is confirmed only numerically for the chosen parameters, not derived from the quasiperiodic Hamiltonian.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the mobility ring expression is exact, the boundary between localized and extended eigenstates in the complex plane can be predicted from the clean-limit dispersion alone, without full diagonalization, for any non-Abelian hopping angles.
  • The ring implies an intermediate window of quasiperiodic strength in which extended and localized eigenstates coexist, so experiments can detect the mobility ring through the inverse participation ratio or transport signatures.
  • Under open boundary conditions, the ring predicts the coexistence of left skin modes, right skin modes, and Anderson-localized bulk modes, with the population contrast controlled by the non-Abelian angles.
  • The localization transition being tied to a spectral winding transition rather than a real-complex transition shows that non-Hermitian topology is the relevant marker for Anderson localization in these non-Abelian systems.
  • The exact ring formula provides a benchmark for testing non-Bloch band theory in quasiperiodic systems with internal degrees of freedom.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The clean-limit derivation suggests the ring radius is set by hopping amplitudes and angles only, not by the quasiperiodic strength; one could test whether a second incommensurate frequency or interactions move the ring without altering its circular shape.
  • Because the ring separates winding sectors, it may be observable in cold-atom or photonic platforms by mapping the spectral winding number over the complex energy plane, analogous to existing skin-effect measurements.
  • The method of deriving mobility edges from the clean-limit $|\beta|=1$ condition could extend to other non-Hermitian quasiperiodic models with spinful or multiband structure, where the mobility boundary may become a more general algebraic curve rather than a circle.
  • The numerical verification covers specific angle choices; scanning the full $\theta_l,\theta_r$ plane would map where the circular form of the mobility ring breaks down.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies a spin-1/2 non-reciprocal Aubry-André chain with SU(2) non-Abelian hopping phases. Using exact diagonalization and indicators such as IPR, NPR, fractal dimension, and spectral winding, the authors report an intermediate phase with coexisting extended and localized eigenstates, bounded by a 'mobility ring' in the complex energy plane. They propose Eq. (8) as an exact expression for this ring, obtained from the clean-limit non-Bloch spectrum with |β|=1, and support it with numerical spectra, IPR-based phase indicators, and finite-size scaling of two critical quasiperiodic strengths. The paper also discusses skin modes under open boundary conditions and the effect of the non-Abelian gauge field on the real-complex transition.

Significance. If substantiated, the result would be a novel extension of mobility-edge physics: a non-Hermitian mobility ring induced by a non-Abelian gauge field, with a closed-form expression depending only on model parameters and no fitting parameters. The paper's numerical evidence (IPR/NPR, fractal dimension, spectral winding, finite-size scaling) is extensive and internally consistent for the parameter set studied. The use of established non-Bloch and winding-number results is appropriate. However, the central analytical claim is presented as 'exact' while being explicitly conjectural in the derivation, and the key formula as printed is not mathematically a circle. These issues must be resolved before the main claim can be accepted.

major comments (4)
  1. [Sec. III, Eq. (8)] The 'exact expression' for the mobility ring is not derived. Immediately before Eq. (6), the authors write 'Therefore, we conjecture that the circle's radius is the modulus of extended eigenenergies', and later they state that for fragmented spectra 'the complex mobility edges cannot be analytically obtained [51]'. The identification of the clean-limit |β|=1 circle with the finite-V mobility edge is load-bearing for the abstract and conclusion, which call Eq. (8) exact. Please either supply a rigorous derivation (e.g., via Avila's global theory adapted to this two-band model) or explicitly reframe Eq. (8) as a conjectured expression validated numerically.
  2. [Eq. (8)] Equation (8), x^2 + y^2 = E(β_c)^2, is not a circle equation in the complex plane. If x + iy = E(β_c), then the left-hand side equals |E(β_c)|^2, so the correct radius condition should be x^2 + y^2 = |E(β_c)|^2 (or x^2 + y^2 = E(β_c) E(β_c)^*). As printed, the formula is inconsistent unless E(β_c) is real, which is not the case for the complex spectra shown. This is a key formula and must be corrected, along with any subsequent statements relying on it.
  3. [Sec. III, Figs. 2 and 3] The numerical verification of the ring structure is limited to a single parameter point (θ_l = -2.5, θ_r = -1.4, g = 0.1, L = 987). Figures 1(d)-(e) and 6 show parameter dependence only of the critical values V_{c,1} and V_{c,2}, not of the ring equation itself. To support the claim that Eq. (8) is exact for general non-Abelian parameters, the authors should compare the predicted ring against numerically extracted mobility edges for several additional parameter sets, or explicitly restrict the claim to the studied regime.
  4. [Sec. III, Fig. 3(e)-(g)] The statement in the Conclusion and abstract that 'the numerical results are in good agreement with the analytical expression' is not quantified. The figures provide a qualitative visual match between the magenta circle and spectral or IPR features, but no quantitative measure (e.g., the mean distance between the Eq. (8) circle and the IPR-based mobility edge in the intermediate V/J window) is given. A quantitative comparison would strengthen the claim and clarify the accuracy of the conjectured expression.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract] The term 'inverse participation rate' should be 'inverse participation ratio' to match the standard terminology and the definition in Eq. (3).
  2. [Fig. 1 caption and text] There is a mismatch between the caption and the text: the text refers to 'Fig. 1(d)' for f_I_m as a function of θ_r, while the caption lists panel (c) as f_I_m versus θ_r and panel (d) as critical points V_{c,1}, V_{c,2}. Please renumber the panels consistently.
  3. [Eq. (7)] The square root in Eq. (7) has two branches, and the text does not specify the branch convention used when comparing E(β) with numerically obtained spectra. Please state the branch choice or define E(β) on the appropriate Riemann sheet.
  4. [Sec. III, after Fig. 2] The phrase 'we numerically prove that the mobility rings can be used to distinguish...' is too strong; numerical evidence supports, but does not prove, the distinction. Please rephrase.
  5. [General] The title contains 'Aubry-Andr\'e' without the accent in the arXiv version; please ensure consistent typesetting of 'André' in all occurrences.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the mobility-ring expression is a conjectured clean-limit non-Bloch contour verified numerically; self-citations are contextual and non-load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is that the mobility ring is given by the clean-limit non-Bloch circle, Eq. (8), for |β_c|=1. The authors explicitly label this as a conjecture ('Therefore, we conjecture that the circle's radius is the modulus of extended eigenenergies') and then verify it against independently computed IPR/NPR and winding-number data. No parameter is fitted to the numerical data; the ring expression is a closed-form function of the model parameters. The load-bearing references (non-Bloch theory, winding-localization correspondence, mobility-ring concept) are external works, while the self-citations (Refs. 30, 35, 46, 49, 70) are contextual and not used to justify the ring derivation. The paper itself concedes that for fragmented spectra 'the complex mobility edges cannot be analytically obtained [51]', which underscores that Eq. (8) is a conjectured identification rather than a derived consequence of the quasiperiodic Hamiltonian. That is a rigor/correctness concern, not circularity: the ring is not defined as the input, and the numerical comparison is independent of the formula. There is also a minor typographical issue in Eq. (8) (the right-hand side should presumably be |E(β_c)|^2), but this does not affect circularity. Overall, no load-bearing step reduces by construction to its own inputs; the score reflects only minor, non-load-bearing self-citations.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model parameters g, θl, θr are chosen for illustration but not fitted; they are kept fixed in the numerical study. The central analytical claim rests on the assumptions listed above, especially the identification of the clean-limit circle as the mobility ring.

free parameters (3)
  • nonreciprocity g = 0.1
    Chosen for illustration; controls the imbalance of left and right hopping amplitudes. Not fitted to data; the qualitative result holds for generic g.
  • left hopping phase θl = -2.5
    Chosen for illustration; one of the two spin-flip phases. The non-Abelian condition requires both phases nonvanishing; exact value does not affect the qualitative ring existence.
  • right hopping phase θr = -1.4
    Chosen for illustration; the other spin-flip phase. Together with θl ensures the gauge field is non-Abelian.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Non-Bloch band theory with a generalized Brillouin zone applies to the quasiperiodic non-Hermitian system and identifies extended states by |β|=1.
    Used to derive E(β) and the mobility ring in Sec. III; this extrapolates the non-Bloch formalism from clean systems to disordered quasiperiodic chains.
  • ad hoc to paper The mobility ring is given by the clean-limit spectrum, i.e., the circle x^2+y^2=E(βc)^2 for |βc|=1.
    The paper asserts this identification without a rigorous proof; it is supported by numerical comparisons. This is the key unproven step in the analytical claim.
  • domain assumption Winding number w=0 corresponds to localized eigenstates and w≠0 to extended eigenstates in the non-Abelian quasiperiodic system.
    Imported from Refs. [33,45,47] for non-Hermitian AA models; not re-derived here for the non-Abelian case.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Mobility rings in a non-Hermitian non-Abelian quasiperiodic lattice." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UBUCJOOK

@misc{pith2026250712176,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Mobility rings in a non-Hermitian non-Abelian quasiperiodic lattice},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UBUCJOOK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2507.12176}
}
read the original abstract

We study localization and topological properties in spin-1/2 non-reciprocal Aubry-Andr\'{e} chain with SU(2) non-Abelian artificial gauge fields. The results reveal that, different from the Abelian case, mobility rings, will emerge in the non-Abelian case accompanied by the non-Hermitian topological phase transition. As the non-Hermitian extension of mobility edges, such mobility rings separate Anderson localized eigenstates from extended eigenstates in the complex energy plane under the periodic boundary condition. Based on the topological properties, we obtain the exact expression of the mobility rings. Furthermore, the corresponding indicators such as inverse participation rate, normalized participation ratio, winding number, non-Hermitian spectral structures and wave functions are numerically studied. The numerical results are in good agreement with the analytical expression, which confirms the emergence of mobility rings.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2507.12176 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. (Color online) (a) Sketch of the nonreciprocal AA [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. (Color online) Energy spectra and correlative Γ under [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. (Color online) Energy spectra under the PBC (black [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. (Color online) MIPR, MNPR and [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 52 canonical work pages

  1. [47]

    Li and Z

    S.-Z. Li and Z. Li, Ring structure in the complex plane: A fingerprint of a non-hermitian mobility edge, Phys. Rev. B 110, L041102 (2024)

    2024

  2. [51]

    Avila, Global theory of one-frequency Schr¨ odinger operators, Acta Mathematica 215, 1 (2015)

    A. Avila, Global theory of one-frequency Schr¨ odinger operators, Acta Mathematica 215, 1 (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [1]

    P. W. Anderson, Absence of diffusion in certain random lattices, Phys. Rev. 109, 1492 (1958)

    1958

  4. [2]

    Abrahams, P

    E. Abrahams, P. W. Anderson, D. C. Licciardello, and T. V. Ramakrishnan, Scaling theory of localization: Absence of quantum diffusion in two dimensions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 42, 673 (1979)

    work page 1979

  5. [3]

    P. A. Lee and T. V. Ramakrishnan, Disordered electronic systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 57, 287 (1985)

    work page 1985

  6. [4]

    Evers and A

    F. Evers and A. D. Mirlin, Anderson transitions, Rev. Mod. Phys. 80, 1355 (2008)

    2008

  7. [5]

    Aubry and G

    S. Aubry and G. Andr´ e, Analyticity breaking and anderson localization in incommensurate lattices, Ann. Israel Phys. Soc 3, 18 (1980)

    work page 1980

  8. [6]

    Roati, C

    G. Roati, C. D’Errico, L. Fallani, M. Fattori, C. Fort, M. Zaccanti, G. Modugno, M. Modugno, and M. Inguscio, Anderson localization of a non-interacting bose–einstein condensate, Nature 453, 895 (2008)

    2008

Show all 79 references
  1. [7]

    Lahini, R

    Y. Lahini, R. Pugatch, F. Pozzi, M. Sorel, R. Morandotti, N. Davidson, and Y. Silberberg, Observation of a localization transition in quasiperiodic photonic lattices, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 013901 (2009)

    2009

  2. [8]

    Dal Negro, C

    L. Dal Negro, C. J. Oton, Z. Gaburro, L. Pavesi, P. Johnson, A. Lagendijk, R. Righini, M. Colocci, and D. S. Wiersma, Light transport through the band-edge states of fibonacci quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 055501 (2003)

    2003

  3. [9]

    H. Hu, A. Strybulevych, J. H. Page, S. E. Skipetrov, and B. A. van Tiggelen, Localization of ultrasound in a three-dimensional elastic network, Nature Physics 4, 945 (2008)

    2008

  4. [10]

    Das Sarma, S

    S. Das Sarma, S. He, and X. C. Xie, Mobility edge in a model one-dimensional potential, Phys. Rev. Lett. 61, 2144 (1988)

    1988

  5. [11]

    Ganeshan, J

    S. Ganeshan, J. H. Pixley, and S. Das Sarma, Nearest neighbor tight binding models with an exact mobility edge in one dimension, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 146601 (2015)

    2015

  6. [12]

    X. Li, X. Li, and S. Das Sarma, Mobility edges in one-dimensional bichromatic incommensurate potentials, Phys. Rev. B 96, 085119 (2017)

    2017

  7. [13]

    H. P. L¨ uschen, S. Scherg, T. Kohlert, M. Schreiber, P. Bordia, X. Li, S. Das Sarma, and I. Bloch, Single- particle mobility edge in a one-dimensional quasiperiodic optical lattice, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 160404 (2018)

    2018

  8. [14]

    E. Guan, G. Wang, X.-W. Guan, and X. Cai, Reentrant localization and mobility edges in a spinful aubry-andr´ e- harper model with a non-abelian potential, Phys. Rev. A 108, 033305 (2023)

    2023

  9. [15]

    Hatano and D

    N. Hatano and D. R. Nelson, Localization transitions in non-hermitian quantum mechanics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 570 (1996)

    1996

  10. [16]

    C. M. Bender and S. Boettcher, Real spectra in non- hermitian hamiltonians having pt symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 5243 (1998)

    1998

  11. [17]

    Z. G. Yuto Ashida and M. Ueda, Non-hermitian physics, Advances in Physics 69, 249 (2020)

    2020

  12. [18]

    E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Exceptional topology of non-hermitian systems, Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 015005 (2021)

    2021

  13. [19]

    K. Ding, C. Fang, and G. Ma, Non-hermitian topology and exceptional-point geometries, Nat. Rev. Phys. 4, 745 (2022)

    2022

  14. [20]

    D´ ora, D

    B. D´ ora, D. Sticlet, and C. P. Moca, Correlations at pt- symmetric quantum critical point, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 146804 (2022)

    2022

  15. [21]

    H. Shen, B. Zhen, and L. Fu, Topological band theory for non-hermitian hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. Lett. 120, 146402 (2018)

    2018

  16. [22]

    Yao and Z

    S. Yao and Z. Wang, Edge states and topological invariants of non-hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 086803 (2018)

    2018

  17. [23]

    S. Yao, F. Song, and Z. Wang, Non-hermitian chern bands, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 136802 (2018)

    2018

  18. [24]

    Z. Gong, Y. Ashida, K. Kawabata, K. Takasan, S. Higashikawa, and M. Ueda, Topological phases of non- hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. X 8, 031079 (2018)

    2018

  19. [25]

    F. Song, S. Yao, and Z. Wang, Non-hermitian topological invariants in real space, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 246801 (2019)

    2019

  20. [26]

    Jin and Z

    L. Jin and Z. Song, Bulk-boundary correspondence in a non-hermitian system in one dimension with chiral inversion symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 99, 081103 (2019)

    2019

  21. [27]

    Yokomizo and S

    K. Yokomizo and S. Murakami, Non-bloch band theory of non-hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 066404 (2019)

    2019

  22. [28]

    L. Xiao, T. Deng, K. Wang, G. Zhu, Z. Wang, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Non-hermitian bulk–boundary correspondence in quantum dynamics, Nature Physics 16, 761 (2020). 8

    2020

  23. [29]

    Z. Yang, K. Zhang, C. Fang, and J. Hu, Non-hermitian bulk-boundary correspondence and auxiliary generalized brillouin zone theory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 226402 (2020)

    2020

  24. [30]

    Zhang, L.-Z

    D.-W. Zhang, L.-Z. Tang, L.-J. Lang, H. Yan, and S.-L. Zhu, Non-hermitian topological anderson insulators, Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astron. 63, 267062 (2020)

    2020

  25. [31]

    Tang, L.-F

    L.-Z. Tang, L.-F. Zhang, G.-Q. Zhang, and D.-W. Zhang, Topological anderson insulators in two-dimensional non- hermitian disordered systems, Phys. Rev. A 101, 063612 (2020)

    2020

  26. [32]

    Q. Lin, T. Li, L. Xiao, K. Wang, W. Yi, and P. Xue, Observation of non-hermitian topological anderson insulator in quantum dynamics, Nat. Commun. 13, 3229 (2022)

    2022

  27. [33]

    Jiang, L.-J

    H. Jiang, L.-J. Lang, C. Yang, S.-L. Zhu, and S. Chen, Interplay of non-hermitian skin effects and anderson localization in nonreciprocal quasiperiodic lattices, Phys. Rev. B 100, 054301 (2019)

    2019

  28. [34]

    L. Li, C. H. Lee, S. Mu, and J. Gong, Critical non- hermitian skin effect, Nat. Commun. 11, 5491 (2020)

    2020

  29. [35]

    Zhang, Y.-L

    D.-W. Zhang, Y.-L. Chen, G.-Q. Zhang, L.-J. Lang, Z. Li, and S.-L. Zhu, Skin superfluid, topological mott insulators, and asymmetric dynamics in an interacting non-hermitian aubry-andr´ e-harper model, Phys. Rev. B 101, 235150 (2020)

    2020

  30. [36]

    Zhang, Y

    L. Zhang, Y. Yang, Y. Ge, Y.-J. Guan, Q. Chen, Q. Yan, F. Chen, R. Xi, Y. Li, D. Jia, S.-Q. Yuan, H.-X. Sun, H. Chen, and B. Zhang, Acoustic non-hermitian skin effect from twisted winding topology, Nat. Commun. 12, 6297 (2021)

    2021

  31. [37]

    L. Li, C. H. Lee, and J. Gong, Topological switch for non-hermitian skin effect in cold-atom systems with loss, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 250402 (2020)

    2020

  32. [38]

    Zhang, Z

    K. Zhang, Z. Yang, and C. Fang, Universal non-hermitian skin effect in two and higher dimensions, Nat. Commun. 13, 2496 (2022)

    2022

  33. [39]

    Longhi, Self-healing of non-hermitian topological skin modes, Phys

    S. Longhi, Self-healing of non-hermitian topological skin modes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 157601 (2022)

    2022

  34. [40]

    Zhang, C

    K. Zhang, C. Fang, and Z. Yang, Dynamical degeneracy splitting and directional invisibility in non-hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 036402 (2023)

    2023

  35. [41]

    Kawabata, T

    K. Kawabata, T. Numasawa, and S. Ryu, Entanglement phase transition induced by the non-hermitian skin effect, Phys. Rev. X 13, 021007 (2023)

    2023

  36. [42]

    R. Lin, T. Tai, L. Li, and C. H. Lee, Topological non- hermitian skin effect, Frontiers of Physics 18, 53605 (2023)

    2023

  37. [43]

    Li, X.-J

    S.-Z. Li, X.-J. Yu, and Z. Li, Emergent entanglement phase transitions in non-hermitian aubry-andr´ e-harper chains, Phys. Rev. B 109, 024306 (2024)

    2024

  38. [44]

    Thouless, Electrons in disordered systems and the theory of localization, Physics Reports 13, 93 (1974)

    D. Thouless, Electrons in disordered systems and the theory of localization, Physics Reports 13, 93 (1974)

    1974

  39. [45]

    Longhi, Topological phase transition in non-hermitian quasicrystals, Phys

    S. Longhi, Topological phase transition in non-hermitian quasicrystals, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 237601 (2019)

    2019

  40. [46]

    Tang, G.-Q

    L.-Z. Tang, G.-Q. Zhang, L.-F. Zhang, and D.-W. Zhang, Localization and topological transitions in non-hermitian quasiperiodic lattices, Phys. Rev. A 103, 033325 (2021)

    2021

  41. [48]

    L. Wang, Z. Wang, and S. Chen, Non-hermitian butterfly spectra in a family of quasiperiodic lattices, Phys. Rev. B 110, L060201 (2024)

    2024

  42. [49]

    J.-F. Ren, J. Li, H.-T. Ding, and D.-W. Zhang, Iden- tifying non-hermitian critical points with the quantum metric, Phys. Rev. A 110, 052203 (2024)

    2024

  43. [50]

    W. Wang, X. Wang, and G. Ma, Anderson transition at complex energies in one-dimensional parity-time- symmetric disordered systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 066301 (2025)

    2025

  44. [52]

    Dalibard, F

    J. Dalibard, F. Gerbier, G. Juzeli¯ unas, and P. ¨Ohberg, Colloquium: Artificial gauge potentials for neutral atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 1523 (2011)

    2011

  45. [53]

    Goldman, G

    N. Goldman, G. Juzeli¯ unas, P. ¨Ohberg, and I. B. Spielman, Light-induced gauge fields for ultracold atoms, Reports on Progress in Physics 77, 126401 (2014)

    2014

  46. [54]

    Goldman, J

    N. Goldman, J. C. Budich, and P. Zoller, Topological quantum matter with ultracold gases in optical lattices, Nature Physics 12, 639 (2016)

    2016

  47. [55]

    Zhang, Y.-Q

    D.-W. Zhang, Y.-Q. Zhu, Y. X. Zhao, H. Yan, and S.- L. Zhu, Topological quantum matter with cold atoms, Advances in Physics 67, 253 (2018)

    2018

  48. [56]

    N. R. Cooper, J. Dalibard, and I. B. Spielman, Topological bands for ultracold atoms, Rev. Mod. Phys. 91, 015005 (2019)

    2019

  49. [57]

    Longhi, D

    S. Longhi, D. Gatti, and G. Della Valle, Non-hermitian transparency and one-way transport in low-dimensional lattices by an imaginary gauge field, Phys. Rev. B 92, 094204 (2015)

    2015

  50. [58]

    Longhi, Non-hermitian bidirectional robust transport, Phys

    S. Longhi, Non-hermitian bidirectional robust transport, Phys. Rev. B 95, 014201 (2017)

    2017

  51. [59]

    Longhi, Nonadiabatic robust excitation transfer assisted by an imaginary gauge field, Phys

    S. Longhi, Nonadiabatic robust excitation transfer assisted by an imaginary gauge field, Phys. Rev. A 95, 062122 (2017)

    2017

  52. [60]

    Midya, H

    B. Midya, H. Zhao, and L. Feng, Non-hermitian photonics promises exceptional topology of light, Nat. Commun. 9, 2574 (2018)

    2018

  53. [61]

    Wong and S

    S. Wong and S. S. Oh, Topological bulk lasing modes using an imaginary gauge field, Phys. Rev. Res.3, 033042 (2021)

    2021

  54. [62]

    Lu, X.-X

    M. Lu, X.-X. Zhang, and M. Franz, Magnetic suppression of non-hermitian skin effects, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 256402 (2021)

    2021

  55. [63]

    Shao, Z.-T

    K. Shao, Z.-T. Cai, H. Geng, W. Chen, and D. Y. Xing, Cyclotron quantization and mirror-time transition on nonreciprocal lattices, Phys. Rev. B106, L081402 (2022)

    2022

  56. [64]

    W. Gou, T. Chen, D. Xie, T. Xiao, T.-S. Deng, B. Gadway, W. Yi, and B. Yan, Tunable nonreciprocal quantum transport through a dissipative aharonov-bohm ring in ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 070402 (2020)

    2020

  57. [65]

    Liang, D

    Q. Liang, D. Xie, Z. Dong, H. Li, H. Li, B. Gadway, W. Yi, and B. Yan, Dynamic signatures of non-hermitian skin effect and topology in ultracold atoms, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 070401 (2022)

    2022

  58. [66]

    C. Wu, Z. Yang, J. Tang, N. Liu, and G. Chen, Flux- controlled skin effect and topological transition in a dissipative two-leg ladder model, Phys. Rev. A 106, 062206 (2022)

    2022

  59. [67]

    C.-A. Li, B. Trauzettel, T. Neupert, and S.-B. Zhang, Enhancement of second-order non-hermitian skin effect by magnetic fields, Phys. Rev. Lett. 131, 116601 (2023)

    2023

  60. [68]

    Zhang, Y

    W. Zhang, Y. Hu, H. Zhang, X. Liu, G. Veronis, Y. Shen, Y. Huang, W. Luo, and A. Alu‘, (2024), 9 arXiv:2408.07406 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2024 arXiv

  61. [69]

    X. Li, J. Liu, and T. Liu, Localization–delocalization transitions in non-hermitian aharonov–bohm cages, Frontiers of Physics 19, 33211 (2024)

    2024

  62. [70]

    Chen, G.-Q

    R.-J. Chen, G.-Q. Zhang, Z. Li, and D.-W. Zhang, Antichiral and trap-skin dynamics in a nonreciprocal bosonic two-leg ladder with artificial magnetic flux, Phys. Rev. A 110, 043311 (2024)

    2024

  63. [71]

    Li, J.-H

    Y. Li, J.-H. Zhang, Y. Kou, L. Xiao, S. Jia, L. Li, and F. Mei, Observation of gauge field induced non-hermitian helical spin skin effects, (2025), arXiv:2504.18063 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

    2025

  64. [72]

    Ezawa, Non-hermitian non-abelian topological insu- lators with PT symmetry, Phys

    M. Ezawa, Non-hermitian non-abelian topological insu- lators with PT symmetry, Phys. Rev. Res. 3, 043006 (2021)

    2021

  65. [73]

    Liang, R

    Y. Liang, R. Wang, Z. Yu, J. Chen, L. Xiao, S. Jia, and L. Zhang, Three-band non-hermitian non-abelian topological insulator with PT symmetry, Phys. Rev. B 109, 115127 (2024)

    2024

  66. [74]

    Zhao, C.-X

    X.-M. Zhao, C.-X. Guo, M.-L. Yang, H. Wang, W.-M. Liu, and S.-P. Kou, Anomalous non-abelian statistics for non-hermitian generalization of majorana zero modes, Phys. Rev. B 104, 214502 (2021)

    2021

  67. [75]

    C.-X. Guo, S. Chen, K. Ding, and H. Hu, Exceptional non-abelian topology in multiband non-hermitian sys- tems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 157201 (2023)

    2023

  68. [76]

    Shan, Y.-K

    Z.-L. Shan, Y.-K. Sun, R. Tao, Q.-D. Chen, Z.-N. Tian, and X.-L. Zhang, Non-abelian holonomy in degenerate non-hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 053802 (2024)

    2024

  69. [77]

    Zhou, Z.-C

    Z. Zhou, Z.-C. Xu, and L.-J. Lang, (2025), arXiv:2502.04888 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2025

  70. [78]

    Z. Pang, B. T. T. Wong, J. Hu, and Y. Yang, Synthetic non-abelian gauge fields for non-hermitian systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 043804 (2024)

    2024

  71. [79]

    Y. Yang, C. Peng, D. Zhu, H. Buljan, J. D. Joannopoulos, B. Zhen, and M. Soljaˇ ci´ c, Synthesis and observation of non-abelian gauge fields in real space, Science 365, 1021 (2019)

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 6, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.