The influence of nitrogen doping and annealing on the silicon vacancy in 4H-SiC

Brenda VanMil; Charity Burgess; Infiter Tathfif; Pratibha Dev; Samuel G. Carter; Suryakanti Debata

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

The influence of nitrogen doping and annealing on the silicon vacancy in 4H-SiC

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Nitrogen doping and moderate annealing can triple the ODMR contrast of silicon vacancies in 4H-SiC, improving cw magnetometry sensitivity by about 1.6×.

desk verdict Useful, well-executed systematic study of N doping and annealing for V2 centers, but the paper's own low-T spectra undermine the PL-as-V_Si^- proxy that its sensitivity numbers rest on. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.17478 v1 pith:UCOSZEQC submitted 2025-06-20 cond-mat.other quant-ph

Samuel G. Carter , Infiter Tathfif , Charity Burgess , Brenda VanMil , Suryakanti Debata , Pratibha Dev This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.otherquant-ph

keywords siliconvacancyV2center4H-SiCnitrogendopingODMRcontrastchargestatecontrolphotoluminescencemagneticfieldsensing

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that nitrogen doping is a practical lever for controlling the charge state of the silicon vacancy in 4H-SiC, and that a 500–600 °C anneal can turn that control into a sizable gain for quantum sensing. The authors measure how photoluminescence, optically detected magnetic resonance (ODMR) contrast, and spin dephasing times of ensembles of the V2 silicon vacancy respond to nitrogen doping levels from $10^{14}$ to $10^{18}$ cm$^{-3}$, electron irradiation doses, and anneal temperatures. They find that moderate annealing raises the ODMR contrast from about 0.5% to as high as 1.5%, with only about a 20% drop in photoluminescence, leading to an estimated 1.6-fold improvement in shot-noise-limited cw ODMR sensitivity relative to undoped, unannealed material. They also propose a microscopic explanation: a nitrogen atom substituting on a carbon site donates one electron to the vacancy, stabilizing the luminescent $V_{Si}^-$ state, while two nearby nitrogen donors push it into the dark $V_{Si}^{2-}$ state.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is charge-state control of the silicon vacancy by nitrogen donors. A carbon-site nitrogen donor ($N_C$) sits in the band gap at the Fermi level so that in the presence of a nearby silicon vacancy it donates one electron, converting $V_{Si}$ to the luminescent $V_{Si}^-$ state with spin $S = 3/2$; two nearby $N_C$ donors donate two electrons, producing the dark $V_{Si}^{2-}$ spin-1 state. The paper supports this picture with spin-polarized density functional theory in a 576-atom supercell, including defect formation energies, density-of-states plots, and spin-density isosurfaces, and uses the ratio of irradiation dose to doping as the experimental dial that moves $V_{Si}$ between these charge states. The annealing step is what converts the improved charge-state population into higher ODMR contrast.

What would settle it

Measure low-temperature PL spectra under resonant excitation of the V2 zero-phonon line and compare the V2-only emission with the broad 850–1300 nm integrated signal across the doping and annealing series; if the ratio does not match the predicted $V_{Si}^-$ fraction, the central charge-state interpretation fails. A complementary check is electron-paramagnetic-resonance counting of $S = 3/2$ versus $S = 1$ vacancy centers as a function of nitrogen concentration and irradiation dose.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the optical and spin properties of V2 ensembles can be deliberately engineered through nitrogen doping and annealing, with the charge state of the silicon vacancy as the controlling variable. Experimentally, the paper shows that the integrated photoluminescence depends nonlinearly on electron irradiation dose for highly doped epilayers: low dose relative to donor concentration leaves $V_{Si}$ in the non-luminescent −2 charge state, while higher dose restores the luminescent −1 state. Annealing at 500–600 °C then raises ODMR contrast from 0.5% to 1.5% while reducing PL by only about 20%, and the resulting cw ODMR shot-noise-limited sensitivity is about 1.6–1.7 times better than undoped, unannealed SiC. The density-functional-theory modeling identifies the mechanism: $N_C$ is a shallow donor that efficiently transfers one electron to $V_{Si}$, yielding the $S = 3/2$ $V_{Si}^-$ defect, whereas two nitrogen donors per vacancy yield $V_{Si}^{2-}$, a spin-1 defect that does not emit in the detection window.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that room-temperature integrated photoluminescence in the 850–1300 nm window directly tracks the concentration of V2 silicon vacancies in the singly negative charge state; if divacancy or nitrogen-vacancy centers also emit in that window, or if nonradiative decay changes with doping and annealing, then the charge-state assignments and the dose-dependence analysis would be biased.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

For a fixed nitrogen concentration, the luminescent $V_{Si}^-$ population can be maximized by matching the electron irradiation dose to the donor density, so dose becomes a tuning knob for charge-state engineering.
A 500–600 °C anneal of moderately doped samples roughly triples ODMR contrast while sacrificing only about 20% of the photoluminescence, making cw ODMR magnetometry about 1.6–1.7 times more sensitive than the undoped, unannealed baseline.
High nitrogen doping shortens the Ramsey dephasing time $T_2^*$ (from about 213 ns to 58 ns at $10^{18}$ cm$^{-3}$), so the same doping that helps cw ODMR does not improve Ramsey pulse magnetometry.
Annealing above 600 °C converts silicon vacancies into other defects such as divacancies and nitrogen-vacancy complexes, so the contrast gain is confined to a specific temperature window.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the charge-state model is right, similar donor engineering could be applied to other SiC defect centers whose optical activity depends on charge state, provided a suitable donor species can be positioned nearby.
The mechanism behind the ODMR contrast jump at 500–600 °C is left open by the paper; a testable possibility is that annealing repairs irradiation damage around $V_{Si}$, restoring unperturbed zero-phonon transitions, which could be checked by correlating contrast with ZPL linewidth at low temperature.
The measured 1.6× sensitivity gain is a lower bound if the irradiation dose can be optimized per doping level, since the PL loss at the optimal anneal is small and the contrast continues to rise with dose.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Dear colleague,

The thing to know about this paper is that it gives the field something it didn't have: a systematic map of how nitrogen doping, electron irradiation dose, and annealing affect the PL, ODMR contrast, and T2* of V2 ensembles in 4H-SiC. The main empirical claim holds up — moderate annealing (500–600 C) of doped epilayers roughly doubles to triples the ODMR contrast, with a modest PL penalty, and the cw sensitivity figure improves by ~1.6–1.7x. That is a practical optimization, not a new platform, but it's useful.

What's genuinely good: the DFT section is independent first-principles work, not fitted to the PL data. It shows N on a carbon site donates an electron to V_Si, stabilizing the -1 state, and that two nearby N drive it to the dark -2 state. The formation-energy numbers are small but physically sensible. The Ramsey measurements are clean, and the trend of shorter T2* with doping is clearly shown.

Now the soft spots. The internal numbers don't match between abstract and body — abstract says 1.5% contrast and 1.6x sensitivity; body says 1.16% and 1.7x. No error bars appear on any data point. The T2* estimates for missing anneal conditions are interpolated, which is transparent but makes the Ramsey figures of merit semi-quantitative. More important, the central assumption that integrated room-temperature PL is a direct measure of V_Si^- concentration is contradicted by their own Fig. 5: at the 500 C anneal the V2 ZPL goes up while the phonon sideband goes down. That means the 850–1300 nm window is not tracking only V2 centers, and the contrast increase could partly come from a changing background fraction rather than a real spin-physics change. The authors mention the discrepancy but don't chase it. A referee should push on this: deconvolve the PL contributions, or at least add a caveat that the sensitivity gains assume a constant background.

The paper is honest about its unknowns. I'd send it out for review — it deserves careful referee time, and the revision requests are concrete. I'd bring it to a reading group to discuss the proxy issue, though it's more of a methods lesson than a groundbreaking result.

My recommendation: engage, with revision.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports an experimental study of the effects of nitrogen doping, 1 MeV electron irradiation dose, and post-irradiation annealing on the photoluminescence (PL), continuous-wave ODMR contrast, and T2* dephasing time of ensembles of the V2 silicon-vacancy center in 4H-SiC epilayers. The authors find that integrated room-temperature PL depends nonlinearly on irradiation dose for high nitrogen doping, which they attribute to charge-state stabilization: nitrogen on a carbon site (NC) donates one electron to stabilize the luminescent V_Si^- state, while two nearby NC donors stabilize the non-luminescent V_Si^2- state. They also observe that annealing at 500-600 C increases the ODMR contrast, with the body text reporting a maximum of 1.16% for the 1e18 cm^-3 doped sample at 500 C versus about 0.5% for the unannealed low-doped sample, at the cost of roughly a 20% reduction in PL. Using a shot-noise-limited sensitivity model, they estimate a cw ODMR sensitivity improvement of about 1.7x (abstract states 1.6x) relative to undoped, unannealed SiC, while the Ramsey figure of merit is barely above unity. First-principles DFT calculations of V_Si with nearby NC substitutions support the charge-state assignments and show that two nearby donors drive V_Si into a spin-1 doubly negative state.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper offers a practical route to improve the cw ODMR contrast of V2 ensembles, which is a recognized limitation for quantum sensing, and it provides a physically motivated picture of charge-state control by nitrogen doping. The DFT part is an independent first-principles computation, not fitted to the PL data, and it gives a concrete microscopic mechanism for the PL-vs-dose behavior. The experimental parameter space (five doping levels, five doses, seven anneal conditions) is broad and the combination of room-temperature PL, ODMR, Ramsey, and low-temperature spectroscopy is valuable for the SiC quantum-defect community. The main weakness is that the interpretation leans on an untested assumption that the integrated room-temperature PL is a direct measure of the V_Si^- concentration; the paper's own low-temperature spectra indicate that this proxy can fail in exactly the annealed, doped conditions where the main contrast improvement is claimed. The reporting inconsistencies between the abstract and the body further reduce confidence in the headline numbers. These issues are fixable, but they are load-bearing for the quantitative conclusions.

major comments (3)

[Section IIIA and Fig. 5] The central assumption that the room-temperature integrated PL 'will generally be considered a measure of the concentration of V_Si^-' (Section IIIA) is load-bearing for three quantitative claims: the charge-state assignments extracted from PL-versus-dose (Fig. 2), the statement that the contrast improvement comes with 'only a 20% decrease in PL,' and the sensing figures of merit F_cw and F_Ramsey through the sqrt(PL) factor. The low-temperature data in Fig. 5 directly undercut this proxy: at the 500 C anneal for the 1e18 cm^-3, 1e19 cm^-2 sample, the V2 ZPL at 916 nm increases while the phonon sideband that dominates the 850-1300 nm room-temperature window decreases. The integrated PL can therefore move oppositely to the V2 population or to the fraction of unperturbed V2 centers. If annealing converts broad or off-spec V2 emitters or a non-V2 background into sharp V2 emitters, the ODMR contrast would increase without any change in per-center spin physics. The authors should either quantify the V2 ZPL area and the non-V2 background as a function of annealing for the representative samples, or explicitly restrict the sensitivity and charge-state claims to a spectrally resolved measure of V2 emission.
[Abstract vs. Section IIIA and IIID] The abstract reports a contrast increase 'from 0.5% ... to 1.5%' and a '1.6 times' cw ODMR sensitivity improvement, while the body text (Section IIIA and Fig. 3(d)) gives a maximum contrast of 1.16% for the 1e18 cm^-3 sample at 500 C, and Section IIID states a peak cw figure of merit of 1.7. These are quantitatively different claims. The authors should reconcile the abstract with the body, identify which doping/dose/anneal condition gives the true maximum contrast, and report whether 1.5% is reached anywhere in the data set. As written, a reader cannot tell which number is the headline result.
[Section IIID and Figs. 6-7] The sensitivity figures of merit rely on T2* values that were not measured for every annealing condition. In Section IIID, T2* for missing anneal temperatures is estimated by assuming it equals the measured 1e14 cm^-3 values for 1e15 cm^-3 doping and by averaging the no-anneal and 600 C values for 1e16 and 1e17 cm^-3 doping. The paper also shows no error bars on any of the PL, ODMR, T2*, or figure-of-merit data. Given that the central quantitative claim is a modest ~1.6-1.7x improvement, the absence of uncertainty estimates and the reliance on interpolated T2* values make it impossible to assess whether the improvement is statistically significant. The authors should provide uncertainties, at least for the key F_cw and F_Ramsey points, and should justify the T2* interpolation with a sensitivity check (e.g., showing that the Ramsey figure of merit does not change qualitatively when the interpolation is replaced by the measured endpoints).

minor comments (5)

[Section IIID, Eqs. (1)-(2)] The detection rate R appears in both sensitivity expressions, but it is not explicitly defined as the background-subtracted photon rate at the detector. Please clarify whether R includes or excludes the non-resonant background, since this affects the absolute but not the relative figures of merit.
[Section IIID, Fig. 7] The extraction of alpha = max(dC/dnu) by taking ODMR 'for a series of powers and differentiating' is described only in words; a brief description of the fitting or numerical differentiation procedure, and of how the maximum slope is identified, would make the figure of merit reproducible.
[Section IIIB] The caption of Fig. 5 mentions a Si CCD, while the methods section states that a Nirvana camera is used for 950-1600 nm; please clarify which detector was used for the spectra shown and whether the spectra are corrected for the detector response.
[General] The notation for charge states is inconsistent in places (e.g., 'V_Si^-' versus 'V_Si^-1', and 'V_Si^2-' versus 'V_Si^-2'); please use a single notation consistently throughout.
[Section IIIA] The sentence about the substrate, 'we do not observe PL from the substrate at these doses, consistent with the idea that only V_Si^2- is present,' would be clearer if accompanied by a control measurement or a reference to a substrate PL spectrum, since the substrate is doped an order of magnitude higher than the 1e18 cm^-3 epilayer.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the DFT modeling is independent, the sensitivity metrics use measured quantities, and the few self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The central quantitative claims are experimental measurements, not derived predictions. The only proxy assumption appears in Section IIIA: 'the integrated PL will generally be considered a measure of the concentration of V_Si^-.' This is an explicit interpretive assumption rather than a fitted parameter or a conclusion derived from itself; the PL-vs-dose data are used to infer likely charge states, but the DFT charge-state assignments in Section IV are obtained from total energies, formation energies, densities of states, and spin densities, without using the PL values as inputs. The sensitivity analysis in Section IIID uses measured ODMR slopes, measured PL, and measured or explicitly interpolated T2* values, with formulas taken from the external Ref. [27]; the interpolated T2* points are labeled as estimates, not as predictions forced by a fit. Self-citations [24], [25], and [40] supply baseline comparisons and a standard symmetry-adapted molecular-orbital description, but they do not carry the argument or forbid alternative explanations. The paper also honestly states a mechanistic limitation in Section V: 'The role that nitrogen plays in this process is unknown.' That is a correctness or completeness concern, not circularity. No equation or central claim reduces by construction to its own inputs, so the paper is self-contained against external benchmarks and merits a low circularity score.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central explanation rests on two domain assumptions: PL intensity as a proxy for V_Si^- concentration, and the adequacy of the PBE functional for charge-state assignments. No fitted parameters enter the DFT, but T2* values for missing annealing conditions are estimated from trends, adding uncertainty to the Ramsey figure of merit.

free parameters (1)

T2* estimates for missing anneal conditions = interpolated from trends in Fig. 6(c-d)
Used in the Ramsey sensing figure of merit for conditions where T2* was not directly measured; these estimates are stated but not error-bounded.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Integrated PL is a measure of V_Si^- concentration
Section IIIA: 'the integrated PL will generally be considered a measure of the concentration of V_Si^-.' Other defects may contribute at room temperature.
domain assumption PBE-GGA adequately describes the charge state of V_Si in N-doped 4H-SiC
Section IVA: PBE is used with GGA; band gap underestimation is not corrected, but the qualitative donor behavior of N_C is claimed robust.
domain assumption V_Si concentration is proportional to electron irradiation dose
Section IIIA: 'The concentration of V_Si in any charge state is expected to be proportional to the dose.' This may fail at high doses where clustering occurs.
standard math Chemical potential references for C and Si are bulk graphite and fcc Si
Standard practice for defect formation energy calculations in Section IVA.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The influence of nitrogen doping and annealing on the silicon vacancy in 4H-SiC." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UCOSZEQC

@misc{pith2026250617478,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The influence of nitrogen doping and annealing on the silicon vacancy in 4H-SiC},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UCOSZEQC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.17478}
}

abstract

The silicon vacancy ($V_{Si}$) in 4H-SiC at its cubic site (V2-center) has shown significant promise for quantum technologies, due to coherent spin states, the mature material system, and stable optical emission. In these SiC-based applications, doping plays a crucial role. It can be used to control the charge state of $V_{Si}$ and formation of different types of defects. Despite its importance, there has been little research on the effects of doping. In this work, we perform a study of the effects of nitrogen doping and annealing on the photoluminescence (PL), optically-detected magnetic resonance (ODMR) contrast, and dephasing times of ensembles of V2 in epilayers of 4H-SiC. The results show an enhancement of PL that depends on the electron irradiation dose for a given electron concentration, supported by theoretical modeling of the charge state of $V_{Si}$ in the presence of nitrogen. Nitrogen substituted for carbon is shown to very efficiently donate one electron to $V_{Si}$. We also observe that the ODMR contrast can be increased from 0.5% in low doped SiC to 1.5% by nitrogen doping of $10^{17}$ to $10^{18}$ cm$^{-3}$ and annealing at 500-600 $^{\circ}$C for 1 hour, with only a 20% decrease in PL compared to unannealed. Some of the improvement in contrast is offset by a reduction in $T_2^*$ at these doping levels, but the estimated cw ODMR shot-noise limited sensitivity is still 1.6 times higher than that of undoped, unannealed SiC.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.17478 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** Integrated room temperature PL signal vs. electron irradiation dose for the nitrogen doping series, with no [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** (a-c) Room temperature integrated PL and (d-f) ODMR signals as a function of anneal temperature for [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (7 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: (a) Room temperature cw ODMR spectra at two RF powers, with peaks labeled according to transitions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: Low temperature PL spectra with a Si CCD and 785 nm excitation for the unannealed samples with nitrogen [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: (a) Pulse sequence for Ramsey measurements, showing the measurement sequence and reference sequence. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]

**Figure 7.** Figure 7: Relative figures of merit for sensing with (a) cw ODMR and (b) Ramsey measurements for the 10 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png]

**Figure 8.** Figure 8: (a) Density of state (DOS) plot around the Fermi level shows the n-doping of 4H-SiC in the presence of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_8.png]

**Figure 9.** Figure 9: Nitrogen-doping 4H-SiC to stabilize the negative charge state of the silicon monovacancies: (a) Two of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_9.png]

**Figure 10.** Figure 10: 𝑉ௌ௜ stabilized in the doubly-charged state in the presence of two nitrogen-dopants: (a) Density of states (DOS) plot for 𝑉ௌ௜ ିଶ in 4H-SiC, with nitrogen-substituents at the S1 and S2 sites. Along with the total DOS (TDOS), we have also shown the DOS projected onto the…

Review history (2 revisions) →

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Designing quantum technologies with a quantum computer
quant-ph 2026-01 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

A hybrid quantum–classical framework using sQKFF plus Gray encoding and qubit-wise commuting aggregation simulates NV-center spin-defect dynamics and spectra with 18–30% gate-count reductions.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

42 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

The magnetic field along the vertical axis is 5.46 mT/A, with experiments performed at either 100 mA (0.55 mT) or 300 mA (1.64 mT)

Each SiC sample is placed at the center of a pair of home-built Helmholtz coils with a radius of 6.4 cm and about 400 turns each. The magnetic field along the vertical axis is 5.46 mT/A, with experiments performed at either 100 mA (0.55 mT) or 300 mA (1.64 mT). The c axis is 4 from the applied magnetic field. Laser excitation was performed with either an...

work page
[2]

Figure 1

The irradiated samples are then diced into 3×3 squares, with each series of squares annealed in a rapid thermal annealer at 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, and 900 C for 1 hour in vacuum. Figure 1. Illustration of the experimental setup for room temperature ODMR, showing the Helmholtz coils (yellow), laser excitation of the SiC sample, and an RF coil near the e...

work page
[3]

W. F. Koehl, B. B. Buckley, F. J. Heremans, G. Calusine, and D. D. Awschalom, Room temperature coherent control of defect spin qubits in silicon carbide, Nature 479, 84 (2011)

2011
[4]

A. L. Falk, P. V . Klimov, B. B. Buckley, V . Ivády, I. A. Abrikosov, G. Calusine, W. F. Koehl, Á. Gali, and D. D. Awschalom, Electrically and Mechanically Tunable Electron Spins in Silicon Carbide Color Centers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 187601 (2014)

work page 2014
[5]

Kraus, V

H. Kraus, V . A. Soltamov, F. Fuchs, D. Simin, A. Sperlich, P. G. Baranov, G. V Astakhov, and V . Dyakonov, Magnetic field and temperature sensing with atomic-scale spin defects in silicon carbide., Sci. Rep. 4, 5303 (2014)

work page 2014
[6]

S. Lee, M. Niethammer, and J. Wrachtrup, Vector magnetometry based on S =3/2 electronic spins, Phys. Rev. B 92, 115201 (2015)

work page 2015
[7]

Simin et al., All-optical dc nanotesla magnetometry using silicon vacancy fine structure in isotopically purified silicon carbide, Phys Rev X 6, 031014 (2016)

D. Simin et al., All-optical dc nanotesla magnetometry using silicon vacancy fine structure in isotopically purified silicon carbide, Phys Rev X 6, 031014 (2016)

work page 2016
[8]

C. J. Cochrane, J. Blacksberg, M. A. Anders, and P. M. Lenahan, Vectorized magnetometer for space applications using electrical readout of atomic scale defects in silicon carbide, Sci. Rep. 6, 37077 (2016)

work page 2016

Show all 42 references

[9]

Ö. O. Soykal and T. L. Reinecke, Quantum metrology with a single spin-3/2 defect in silicon carbide, Phys. Rev. B 95, 081405 (2017)

2017
[10]

Wolfowicz, S

G. Wolfowicz, S. J. Whiteley, and D. D. Awschalom, Electrometry by optical charge conversion of deep defects in 4H-SiC, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 115, 7879 (2018)

2018
[11]

J. B. S. Abraham et al., Nanotesla Magnetometry with the Silicon Vacancy in Silicon Carbide, Phys. Rev. Appl. 15, 064022 (2021)

2021
[12]

Lekavicius, S

I. Lekavicius, S. G. Carter, D. J. Pennachio, S. White, J. R. Hazjus, A. P. Purdy, D. K. Gaskill, A. L. Yeats, and R. L. Myers-Ward, Magnetometry Based on Silicon-Vacancy Centers in Isotopically Purified 4 H -SiC, Phys. Rev. Appl. 19, 044086 (2023)

2023
[13]

D. J. Christle et al., Isolated Spin Qubits in SiC with a High-Fidelity Infrared Spin-to- Photon Interface, Phys. Rev. X 7, 021046 (2017)

2017
[14]

D. D. Awschalom, R. Hanson, J. Wrachtrup, and B. B. Zhou, Quantum technologies with optically interfaced solid-state spins, Nat. Photonics 12, 516 (2018)

2018
[15]

D. M. Lukin, M. A. Guidry, J. Yang, M. Ghezellou, S. Deb Mishra, H. Abe, T. Ohshima, J. Ul-Hassan, and J. Vučković, Two-Emitter Multimode Cavity Quantum Electrodynamics in Thin-Film Silicon Carbide Photonics, Phys. Rev. X 13, 011005 (2023)

2023
[16]

Ecker et al., Quantum communication networks with defects in silicon carbide, ArXiv:2403.03284v1 (2024)

S. Ecker et al., Quantum communication networks with defects in silicon carbide, ArXiv:2403.03284v1 (2024)

2024 arXiv
[17]

Castelletto, A

S. Castelletto, A. Peruzzo, C. Bonato, B. C. Johnson, M. Radulaski, H. Ou, F. Kaiser, and J. Wrachtrup, Silicon Carbide Photonics Bridging Quantum Technology, ACS Photonics 9, 1437 (2022)

2022
[18]

Babin et al., Fabrication and nanophotonic waveguide integration of silicon carbide colour centres with preserved spin-optical coherence, Nat

C. Babin et al., Fabrication and nanophotonic waveguide integration of silicon carbide colour centres with preserved spin-optical coherence, Nat. Mater. 21, 67 (2022)

2022
[19]

Heiler et al., Spectral stability of V2 centres in sub-micron 4H-SiC membranes, Npj Quantum Mater

J. Heiler et al., Spectral stability of V2 centres in sub-micron 4H-SiC membranes, Npj Quantum Mater. 9, 34 (2024)

2024
[20]

M. E. Bathen, A. Galeckas, J. Müting, H. M. Ayedh, U. Grossner, J. Coutinho, Y . K. Frodason, and L. Vines, Electrical charge state identification and control for the silicon vacancy in 4H-SiC, Npj Quantum Inf. 5, 111 (2019)

2019
[21]

C. P. Anderson et al., Electrical and optical control of single spins integrated in scalable semiconductor devices, Science 366, 1225 (2019)

2019
[22]

Steidl et al., Single V2 defect in 4H Silicon Carbide Schottky diode at low temperature, Nat

T. Steidl et al., Single V2 defect in 4H Silicon Carbide Schottky diode at low temperature, Nat. Commun. 16, 4669 (2025)

2025
[23]

X. Wang, M. Zhao, H. Bu, H. Zhang, X. He, and A. Wang, Formation and annealing behaviors of qubit centers in 4H-SiC from first principles, J. Appl. Phys. 114, 194305 (2013)

2013
[24]

N. T. Son and I. G. Ivanov, Charge state control of the silicon vacancy and divacancy in silicon carbide, J. Appl. Phys. 129, 215702 (2021)

2021
[25]

Fuchs, V

F. Fuchs, V . A. Soltamov, S. Väth, P. G. Baranov, E. N. Mokhov, G. V . Astakhov, and V . Dyakonov, Silicon carbide light-emitting diode as a prospective room temperature source for single photons, Sci. Rep. 3, 1637 (2013)

2013
[26]

S. G. Carter, Ö. O. Soykal, P. Dev, S. E. Economou, and E. R. Glaser, Spin coherence and echo modulation of the silicon vacancy in 4H-SiC at room temperature, Phys. Rev. B 92, 161202 (2015)

2015
[27]

Lekavicius, D

I. Lekavicius, D. J. Pennachio, J. R. Hajzus, D. K. Gaskill, A. P. Purdy, A. L. Yeats, P. G. Brereton, E. R. Glaser, T. L. Reinecke, and S. G. Carter, Orders of Magnitude Improvement in Coherence of Silicon-Vacancy Ensembles in Isotopically Purified 4H- SiC, Phys. Rev. Appl. 3...

2022
[28]

Garsi et al., Non-invasive imaging of three-dimensional integrated circuit activity using quantum defects in diamond, Phys

M. Garsi et al., Non-invasive imaging of three-dimensional integrated circuit activity using quantum defects in diamond, Phys. Rev. Appl. 21, 014055 (2021)

2021
[29]

J. F. Barry, J. M. Schloss, E. Bauch, M. J. Turner, C. A. Hart, L. M. Pham, and R. L. Walsworth, Sensitivity optimization for NV-diamond magnetometry, Rev. Mod. Phys. 92, 015004 (2020)

2020
[30]

Janzén, A

E. Janzén, A. Gali, P. Carlsson, A. Gällström, B. Magnusson, and N. T. Son, The silicon vacancy in SiC, Phys. B Condens. Matter 404, 4354 (2009)

2009
[31]

Kraus, V

H. Kraus, V . A. Soltamov, D. Riedel, S. Väth, F. Fuchs, A. Sperlich, P. G. Baranov, V . Dyakonov, and G. V . Astakhov, Room-temperature quantum microwave emitters based on spin defects in silicon carbide, Nat. Phys. 10, 157 (2014)

2014
[32]

Castelletto, B

S. Castelletto, B. C. Johnson, V . Ivády, N. Stavrias, T. Umeda, A. Gali, and T. Ohshima, A silicon carbide room-temperature single-photon source, Nat. Mater. 13, 151 (2014)

2014
[33]

M. Rühl, C. Ott, S. Götzinger, M. Krieger, and H. B. Weber, Controlled generation of intrinsic near-infrared color centers in 4H-SiC via proton irradiation and annealing, Appl. Phys. Lett. 113, 122102 (2018)

2018
[34]

S. A. Zargaleh et al., Evidence for near-infrared photoluminescence of nitrogen vacancy centers in 4H-SiC, Phys. Rev. B 94, 060102(R) (2016)

2016
[35]

Wimbauer, B

T. Wimbauer, B. K. Meyer, A. Hofstaetter, A. Scharmann, and H. Overhof, Negatively charged Si vacancy in 4H SiC: A comparison between theory and experiment, Phys. Rev. B 56, 7384 (1997)

1997
[36]

Wagner, B

M. Wagner, B. Magnusson, W. M. Chen, E. Janzén, E. Sörman, C. Hallin, and J. L. Lindström, Electronic structure of the neutral silicon vacancy in 4H and 6H SiC, Phys. Rev. B 62, 16555 (2000)

2000
[37]

Kasper et al., Influence of Irradiation on Defect Spin Coherence in Silicon Carbide, Phys

C. Kasper et al., Influence of Irradiation on Defect Spin Coherence in Silicon Carbide, Phys. Rev. Appl. 13, 044054 (2020)

2020
[38]

Giannozzi et al., QUANTUM ESPRESSO: A modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials, J

P. Giannozzi et al., QUANTUM ESPRESSO: A modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials, J. Phys. Condens. Matter 21, 395502 (2009)

2009
[39]

J. P. Perdew and W. Yue, Accurate and simple density functional for the electronic exchange energy: Generalized gradient approximation, Phys. Rev. B 33, 8800 (1986)

1986
[40]

J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996)

1996
[41]

H. J. Monkhorst and J. D. Pack, Special points for Brillonin-zone integrations, Phys. Rev. B 13, 5188 (1976)

1976
[42]

Joshi and P

T. Joshi and P. Dev, Site-Dependent Properties of Quantum Emitters in Nanostructured Silicon Carbide, PRX Quantum 3, 020325 (2022)

2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

The magnetic field along the vertical axis is 5.46 mT/A, with experiments performed at either 100 mA (0.55 mT) or 300 mA (1.64 mT)

Each SiC sample is placed at the center of a pair of home-built Helmholtz coils with a radius of 6.4 cm and about 400 turns each. The magnetic field along the vertical axis is 5.46 mT/A, with experiments performed at either 100 mA (0.55 mT) or 300 mA (1.64 mT). The c axis is 4 from the applied magnetic field. Laser excitation was performed with either an...

work page

[2] [2]

Figure 1

The irradiated samples are then diced into 3×3 squares, with each series of squares annealed in a rapid thermal annealer at 400, 500, 600, 700, 800, and 900 C for 1 hour in vacuum. Figure 1. Illustration of the experimental setup for room temperature ODMR, showing the Helmholtz coils (yellow), laser excitation of the SiC sample, and an RF coil near the e...

work page

[3] [3]

W. F. Koehl, B. B. Buckley, F. J. Heremans, G. Calusine, and D. D. Awschalom, Room temperature coherent control of defect spin qubits in silicon carbide, Nature 479, 84 (2011)

2011

[4] [4]

A. L. Falk, P. V . Klimov, B. B. Buckley, V . Ivády, I. A. Abrikosov, G. Calusine, W. F. Koehl, Á. Gali, and D. D. Awschalom, Electrically and Mechanically Tunable Electron Spins in Silicon Carbide Color Centers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 187601 (2014)

work page 2014

[5] [5]

Kraus, V

H. Kraus, V . A. Soltamov, F. Fuchs, D. Simin, A. Sperlich, P. G. Baranov, G. V Astakhov, and V . Dyakonov, Magnetic field and temperature sensing with atomic-scale spin defects in silicon carbide., Sci. Rep. 4, 5303 (2014)

work page 2014

[6] [6]

S. Lee, M. Niethammer, and J. Wrachtrup, Vector magnetometry based on S =3/2 electronic spins, Phys. Rev. B 92, 115201 (2015)

work page 2015

[7] [7]

Simin et al., All-optical dc nanotesla magnetometry using silicon vacancy fine structure in isotopically purified silicon carbide, Phys Rev X 6, 031014 (2016)

D. Simin et al., All-optical dc nanotesla magnetometry using silicon vacancy fine structure in isotopically purified silicon carbide, Phys Rev X 6, 031014 (2016)

work page 2016

[8] [8]

C. J. Cochrane, J. Blacksberg, M. A. Anders, and P. M. Lenahan, Vectorized magnetometer for space applications using electrical readout of atomic scale defects in silicon carbide, Sci. Rep. 6, 37077 (2016)

work page 2016