Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Layer Pruning via Fusible Residual Convolutional Block for Deep Neural Networks

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2011.14356 v1 pith:UJKTZ4NZ submitted 2020-11-29 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords pruninglayerconvolutionalresconvdeepmodelnetworkstraining
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

In order to deploy deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) on resource-limited devices, many model pruning methods for filters and weights have been developed, while only a few to layer pruning. However, compared with filter pruning and weight pruning, the compact model obtained by layer pruning has less inference time and run-time memory usage when the same FLOPs and number of parameters are pruned because of less data moving in memory. In this paper, we propose a simple layer pruning method using fusible residual convolutional block (ResConv), which is implemented by inserting shortcut connection with a trainable information control parameter into a single convolutional layer. Using ResConv structures in training can improve network accuracy and train deep plain networks, and adds no additional computation during inference process because ResConv is fused to be an ordinary convolutional layer after training. For layer pruning, we convert convolutional layers of network into ResConv with a layer scaling factor. In the training process, the L1 regularization is adopted to make the scaling factors sparse, so that unimportant layers are automatically identified and then removed, resulting in a model of layer reduction. Our pruning method achieves excellent performance of compression and acceleration over the state-of-the-arts on different datasets, and needs no retraining in the case of low pruning rate. For example, with ResNet-110, we achieve a 65.5%-FLOPs reduction by removing 55.5% of the parameters, with only a small loss of 0.13% in top-1 accuracy on CIFAR-10.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Structure-Aware Automatic Channel Pruning by Searching with Graph Embedding

    cs.AI 2025-06 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A graph-embedding search over discretized pruning rates, guided by contrastive learning, claims high compression on CIFAR-10 but lacks key validation.

Pith tools