Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Enhanced Dissipation, Taylor Dispersion, and Inviscid Damping of Couette flow in the Boussinesq system on the Plane

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Stratified Couette flow on the whole plane is quantitatively stable, with explicit enhanced dissipation, Taylor dispersion, and inviscid damping rates.

desk verdict A genuine first nonlinear stability result for Boussinesq–Couette on R^2, but the written proof has load-bearing gaps that need real work before the theorem is verifiable. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.00690 v2 pith:UJVZ5WXL submitted 2025-01-01 math.AP

Ryan Arbon This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35Q3535B3576D0576E0576D50
keywords BoussinesqsystemCouetteflowenhanceddissipationTaylordispersioninvisciddampingstratifiedshearasymptoticstabilityanisotropicSobolevspaces
topics Navier-Stokes Regularity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proves that the stably stratified Couette flow $(y,0)$, $\rho=1-by$, on the whole plane $\mathbb{R}^2$ is quantitatively asymptotically stable under the fully dissipative 2D Boussinesq equations, provided the Richardson number $R>1/4$ and the viscosity and density dissipations are comparable as in (1.4). For initial perturbations of size $\mu^{1/2+\delta^*}$ in a low-regularity anisotropic Sobolev norm, with $\mu$ roughly the smaller of $\nu$ and $\kappa$ corrected by a factor depending on $R$, the paper establishes explicit decay rates for enhanced dissipation, Taylor dispersion, and inviscid damping, together with transient growth of vorticity and density gradient. This is the first nonlinear result of this type for the Boussinesq system on the fully unbounded domain $\mathbb{R}^2$, removing the periodicity-in-$x$ restriction of previous work on $\mathbb{T}\times\mathbb{R}$.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by the frequency-by-frequency energy $E_k[Z_k,Q_k]$ in the moving reference frame $X=x-yt$, built on symmetrized variables $Z = \langle\partial_X\rangle^{1/2}p^{-1/4}\Omega$ and $Q = \sqrt{R}\,\partial_X|\partial_X|^{-1}\langle\partial_X\rangle^{1/2}p^{1/4}\Theta$, where $p=k^2+(\eta-kt)^2$. The energy contains cross-terms between $Z$ and $Q$ that turn the coupling into dissipation, an exponential multiplier $N_k$ tied to the stratification, and the inviscid damping operator $J_k(t,\eta)=\frac12\arctan(\eta/k-t)$. The linearized system satisfies the pointwise differential inequality $\frac{d}{dt}E_k \leq -c_1 D_k - c_0\lambda_k E_k$, with $\lambda_k = \mu^{1/3}|k|^{2/3}$ for $|k|\geq\mu$ and $|k|^2/\nu$ for $|k|\leq\mu$; this single multiplier encodes both enhanced dissipation at high $x$-frequencies and Taylor dispersion at low $x$-frequencies. The nonlinear problem is closed by a bootstrap in the energy $E[Z,Q]=\int\!\int \langle c\lambda_k t\rangle^{2J} M_k(t)\langle k,\eta\rangle^{2n}\langle k\rangle^{2m} E_k\, d\eta\, dk$, where $M_k$ solves a designed ODE that absorbs time-derivatives of the decay weight, and the nonlinear terms are bounded by $\mu^{-1/2-\delta^*} D E^{1/2}$ through a sequence of interpolation lemmas in frequency space.

What would settle it

A direct calculation of the mixed nonlinear terms $T_{\gamma,m1}$ and $T_{\gamma,m2}$ in Section 4.3 that violates the claimed $\mu^{-1/2-\delta^*} D E^{1/2}$ bound, or a counterexample to any of Lemmas 6.4, 6.6, or 6.7, would invalidate the bootstrap and hence the main theorem.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a set of explicit quantitative estimates for the nonlinear problem. Theorem 1.1 states that if $\|\omega_{in}\|_{V(0)} + \sqrt{R}\|\nabla\theta_{in}\|_{V(0)} = \zeta \leq \delta \mu^{1/2+\delta^*}$, then for all $t\geq 0$, $\|\omega\|_{V(t)} + \sqrt{R}\|\nabla\theta\|_{V(t)} \leq 2\langle t\rangle^{1/2}\zeta$, $\|\partial_x u_1\|_{V(t)} + \sqrt{R}\|\partial_x\theta\|_{V(t)} \leq 2\langle t\rangle^{-1/2}\zeta$, and $\|\partial_x|\partial_x,\partial_y+t\partial_x|^{-1}\partial_x u_2\|_{V(t)} \leq 2\langle t\rangle^{-3/2}\zeta$, with an integral control on $u_2$. Here $V(t)$ is a time-dependent anisotropic Sobolev norm adapted to the sheared coordinates. In the symmetrized variables the proof reduces to a bootstrap showing that the energy $E[Z,Q]$ and dissipation $D[Z,Q]$ satisfy $\frac{d}{dt}E \leq -4cD + \mu^{-1/2-\delta^*} C^{1/2} E^{1/2} D$, which closes once the initial energy is below $O(\mu^{1+2\delta^*})$.

Load-bearing premise

The whole nonlinear proof rests on the frequency-space interpolation estimates collected in Lemmas 6.1-6.8 and on the assertion that the mixed nonlinear terms, which the paper does not compute, obey the same bounds as the principal terms; several of those lemmas are stated without proof, and if any one of them fails, the bootstrap argument proving Theorem 2.1 and hence Theorem 1.1 collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any perturbation of Couette flow in the stably stratified Boussinesq system on $\mathbb{R}^2$ with initial size $\zeta \leq \delta\mu^{1/2+\delta^*}$ in the $V(0)$ norm remains globally controlled, with the bounds (1.9) holding for all time.
  • Nonzero $x$-frequencies decay at the enhanced dissipation rate $\exp(-c\lambda_k t)$, which is faster than heat diffusion when $|k|\geq\mu$, with rate $\mu^{1/3}|k|^{2/3}$.
  • Low $x$-frequencies are controlled by Taylor dispersion with the rate $|k|^2/\nu$, the shear-accelerated diffusion rate.
  • The velocity and density perturbations exhibit inviscid damping: $u_1$ and $\theta$ decay like $\langle t\rangle^{-1/2}$, the second velocity component decays like $\langle t\rangle^{-3/2}$, while vorticity and density gradient grow like $\langle t\rangle^{1/2}$ as in the linear theory.
  • The result on the fully unbounded plane $\mathbb{R}^2$ removes the periodicity-in-$x$ restriction of earlier nonlinear results on $\mathbb{T}\times\mathbb{R}$, and the alternate theorem gives an $L^\infty_k$ version of the bounds that controls an additional half-derivative at low frequencies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: the same frequency-by-frequency energy construction should extend to other strictly monotone shear profiles on unbounded domains, such as Poiseuille-type flows, whenever the analogous pointwise dissipation terms dominate the nonlinear convolution.
  • Editorial inference: because $\delta^*\in(0,1/12)$ is arbitrary, the method leaves open whether the sharp stability threshold is exactly $\mu^{1/2}$; testing the bootstrap at $\delta^*=0$ would decide whether the $\mu^{1/2+\delta^*}$ loss is an artifact of the interpolation scheme.
  • Editorial inference: the three interpolation lemmas stated without proof (Lemmas 6.4, 6.6, and 6.7) are the natural place to look first; a direct verification or numerical check of those frequency-space estimates would either certify or refute the nonlinear bounds in Lemma 4.1.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies the 2D Boussinesq system on R^2 near the stably stratified Couette flow. Its main result, Theorem 1.1, asserts that if R > 1/4, ν and κ satisfy (1.4), and the initial perturbation has size ζ ≤ δ µ^{1/2+δ*} in a low-order anisotropic Sobolev norm V(0), then the solution obeys the quantitative estimates in (1.9): growth of (ω, ∇θ) at the rate ⟨t⟩^{1/2}, decay of ∂_x u_1 and ∂_x θ at the rate ⟨t⟩^{-1/2}, and decay of ∂_x |∂_x, ∂_y+t∂_x|^{-1} ∂_x u_2 at the rate ⟨t⟩^{-3/2}, together with an integrated dissipation bound. The proof introduces symmetrized variables in a moving frame, proves a pointwise-in-frequency linear energy estimate (Proposition 2.2), and then uses a bootstrap argument based on the nonlinear estimate Lemma 4.1. A second theorem (Theorem 1.2) is formulated with an additional L∞_k component in the norm and is treated in Section 5.

Significance. If the proof is completed, the result is a significant advance: it is the first quantitative nonlinear stability result for the Boussinesq system near Couette flow on the fully unbounded domain R^2, and it simultaneously provides explicit enhanced dissipation, Taylor dispersion, and inviscid damping rates in a low-order anisotropic norm. The linear part of the paper is careful: the pointwise energy (2.7), the derivation of Proposition 2.2 in Section 3, and the explicit choice of constants in Remark 3.1 are presented in detail, and the rates in (1.9) are concrete and testable. However, the nonlinear estimate Lemma 4.1, which is the load-bearing step for Theorem 1.1, is not proven in the written manuscript: several interpolation lemmas it relies on are stated without proof, and several mixed nonlinear terms are not estimated. These gaps can in principle be filled within the same framework, so I do not regard the central idea as unsound, but the proof as written is incomplete.

major comments (3)
  1. [Appendix (Lemmas 6.4, 6.6, 6.7); Section 4 estimates (4.14), (4.20)] The proof of Lemma 4.1 uses interpolation lemmas that are not proved. Lemma 6.4 is introduced with the note that its proof is not presented, Lemma 6.6 with the note that its proof is omitted for the sake of space, and Lemma 6.7 with the note that its proof has no new ideas. These are not peripheral: Lemma 6.4 is used in the bound of T^y_{α,Z1,LH} at (4.20), Lemma 6.6 in the bound of T^y_{γ,Z1,HL,(·,H)} at (4.14), and Lemma 6.7 in the bounds for T^x_{α,Z2,LH} and T^x_{β,Q2,HL}. Without these estimates, the bound (4.8) on |T_γ|+|T_α|+|T_β| is not established, and consequently the bootstrap inequality (2.17) that yields Theorem 2.1 and then Theorem 1.1 is not justified.
  2. [Section 4.3 and (4.7)] The decomposition (4.7) defines mixed terms T_{γ,m1}, T_{γ,m2}, T_{α,m1}, T_{α,m2}, T_{β,m1}, and T_{β,m2}, yet no estimates are given for these quantities. Section 4.3 states only that T_{γ,m1} and T_{γ,m2} follow schematically from the Z and Q arguments, citing boundedness of ∂_t p/(|k|p^{1/2}); Sections 4.4–4.7 then estimate only the T_{*,Z} and T_{*,Q} components. This is not an automatic reduction: the mixed integrands contain Re(NL^{(Z)}_k \overline{Q_k}) and Re(\overline{Z_k} NL^{(Q)}_k), where the nonlinearities (4.9)–(4.10) carry different powers of p and different k-sign factors, so an explicit estimate is required. Moreover the mixed terms for the α and β components are not mentioned after (4.7). Since Lemma 4.1 requires bounds for all of T_γ, T_α, and T_β, the proof of the main nonlinear estimate is incomplete.
  3. [Section 5, Lemma 5.3 and (5.6)–(5.7)] The alternate theorem has the same structural gap. Lemma 5.3 bounds T_∞ together with time-integrated versions of T_γ, T_α, and T_β, but the proof in Sections 5.3–5.4 estimates only T_∞,Z and T_∞,Q. The mixed terms T_∞,m1 and T_∞,m2, defined just before (5.7), are never estimated. The text says that the bounds on T_γ, T_α, and T_β are proven in a similar manner to Sections 4.1–4.7, but since those sections already omit the mixed terms and rely on unproved lemmas, Theorem 1.2 is not established as written.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sections 4.4–4.7] The symbols A(k) and B(k) are used throughout the nonlinear estimates without being defined; the notation strongly suggests A(k)^2 = α_k and B(k)^2 = β_k from (2.8), but this identification is never stated. The estimates systematically use identities such as B(k)^2 |k| ≲ A(k), so the definition should be given explicitly at first use.
  2. [Corollary 3.5] The displayed u_2 estimate has the positive power ⟨t⟩^{(1+d)/2}, which is inconsistent with the inviscid damping statements of Corollary 3.4 and with the decay of ∂_x u_2 in (1.9); the exponent should presumably be negative.
  3. [Proposition 2.2] In the displayed final estimate, the two integral terms after e^{2cλ_kt} E_k are not separated by a plus sign; the inequality appears to have a missing '+'.
  4. [Theorem 2.1] The statement refers to 'the corresponding solution (Z,Q) to (1.3)' in the line following (2.5); the symmetrized system is (2.4), not (1.3).
  5. [Throughout] There are numerous typos in headings and formulas, for example 'Dam ping' in the title, 'cmpletes' at the end of Section 4, and inconsistent spellings of Riesz; these should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the nonlinear bootstrap is proved internally, with self-citation used only for methodology.

full rationale

The main theorem is proved through an internal bootstrap: Section 3 proves the pointwise linear dissipation estimate Proposition 2.2 by direct computation, Section 4 establishes Lemma 2.3 by estimating T_gamma + T_alpha + T_beta via the interpolation lemmas, and Remark 2.1 derives Theorem 2.1 from Lemma 2.3. No parameter is fitted to the quantity being predicted, and no conclusion is assumed in the norm definitions; the enhanced dissipation, Taylor dispersion, and inviscid damping rates are encoded in the weighted norm V(t) but must be earned by the energy and dissipation inequalities. The self-citation to [1] (Arbon and Bedrossian) supplies the norm template, the J_k multiplier, and the bootstrap format, but the estimates themselves are carried out in the present paper, and the cited work is not invoked as the proof of Lemma 2.3 or Lemma 4.1. The paper does contain verification gaps: Lemmas 6.4, 6.6, and 6.7 are stated without proof, and Section 4.3 declines to compute the mixed terms T_gamma,m1 and T_gamma,m2, asserting only that they follow schematically identically. These are omitted-support issues, not circular reductions, because the bounds are asserted as independent intermediate inequalities rather than being defined in terms of the theorem's conclusion.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The main free parameters are the small bookkeeping exponent δ* and the chosen constants in the energy method; none are fitted to data. The axioms are standard analytic assumptions plus the domain restrictions R>1/4 and the comparability condition (1.4).

free parameters (3)
  • δ* = arbitrary in (0,1/12)
    Introduced as a small bookkeeping exponent to absorb powers of µ in the nonlinear estimates; the stability threshold depends on it.
  • m, n, J = m>1/2, n≥0, J≥1
    Regularity parameters in the norms V and W; not fitted but chosen by the theorem.
  • c, cα, cβ, cτ = small constants with explicit upper bounds (Remark 3.1)
    Constants in the energy method, chosen sufficiently small to make the hypocoercive estimates close; they depend on R and ε but not on ν,κ.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Richardson number R > 1/4 (Miles-Howard criterion)
    Ensures the stratified Couette flow is linearly stable; stated in the introduction and used throughout.
  • domain assumption Condition (1.4): max{ν,κ}/min{ν,κ} ≤ 4√R - 1 - ε
    Restricts to comparable dissipation coefficients so that µ is positive; taken from [32] and [11].
  • domain assumption Existence and uniqueness of solutions to the nonlinear Boussinesq system in the chosen regularity class
    The paper assumes a solution exists for the initial data satisfying the smallness condition; no proof of local well-posedness is given.
  • standard math Standard Fourier and integral inequalities (Hölder, Young, Riesz transform boundedness)
    Used throughout the energy estimates without proof.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Enhanced Dissipation, Taylor Dispersion, and Inviscid Damping of Couette flow in the Boussinesq system on the Plane." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UJVZ5WXL

@misc{pith2026250100690,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Enhanced Dissipation, Taylor Dispersion, and Inviscid Damping of Couette flow in the Boussinesq system on the Plane},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UJVZ5WXL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.00690}
}
abstract

We consider the quantitative asymptotic stability of the stably stratified Couette flow solution to the 2D fully dissipative nonlinear Boussinesq system on $\mathbb{R}^2$ with large Richardson number $R > 1/4$, viscosity $\nu$ and density dissipation $\kappa$. For an initial perturbation $(\omega_{in}, \theta_{in})$ of size $\mu^{1/2 + \epsilon}$ in a low-order anisotropic Sobolev space, for $\mu$ roughly $\min(\nu, \kappa)\left(1 - O(1/\sqrt{R})\right)$ and $\nu$, $\kappa$ comparable, we demonstrate asymptotic stability with explicit enhanced dissipation and Taylor dispersion rates of decay. We also give inviscid damping estimates on the velocity $u$ and the density $\theta$. This is the first result of its type for the Boussinesq system on the fully unbounded domain $\mathbb{R}^2$. We also translate some known linear results from $\mathbb{T} \times \mathbb{R}$ to $\mathbb{R}^2$, and we give an alternative theorem for the nonlinear result.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Transition threshold of Couette flow for 2D Boussinesq equations

    math.AP 2025-06 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    The stability threshold α=1/3 for 2D Boussinesq-Couette flow holds for unequal viscosity and thermal diffusivity, with H^{s+1/2} regularity for s>3/2.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

35 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Arbon and J

    R. Arbon and J. Bedrossian, Quantitative hydrodynamic stability for couette flow on unb ounded domains with navier boundary conditions (2024), available at 2404.02412

    arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    Aris, On the disperions of a solute in a fluid flowing throw a tube , Proceedings of the Royals Society of London A 235 (1956), 67–77

    R. Aris, On the disperions of a solute in a fluid flowing throw a tube , Proceedings of the Royals Society of London A 235 (1956), 67–77

    work page 1956

  3. [3]

    Bedrossian, R

    J. Bedrossian, R. Bianchini, M. Coti Zelati, and M. Dolce , Nonlinear inviscid damping and shear-buoyancy instabilit y in the two-dimensional boussinesq equations , Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics 76 (2023), no. 12, 3685– 3768, available at https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/cpa.22123

    work page doi:10.1002/cpa.22123 2023

  4. [4]

    Bedrossian, M

    J. Bedrossian, M. Coti Zelati, and M. Dolce, Taylor dispersion and phase mixing in the non-cutoff boltzma nn equation on the whole space , Proceedings of the London Mathematical Society 129 (2024), e12616

    work page 2024

  5. [5]

    Bedrossian, P

    J. Bedrossian, P. Germain, and N. Masmoudi, Stability of the couette flow at high reynolds number in two di mensions and three dimensions, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 54 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Bedrossian, S

    J. Bedrossian, S. He, S. Iyer, and F. W ang, Stability threshold of nearly-couette shear flows with navi er boundary conditions in 2d (2023), available at 2311.00141

    arXiv 2023

  7. [7]

    Bedrossian and N

    J. Bedrossian and N. Masmoudi, Inviscid damping and the asymptotic stability of planar she ar flows in the 2d euler equations, Publications math´ ematiques de l’IH´ES 122 (2015), 195 –300

    work page 2015

  8. [8]

    Bedrossian, N

    J. Bedrossian, N. Masmoudi, and Vicol. V., Enhanced dissipation and inviscid damping in the inviscid l imit of the navier- stokes equations near the two dimensional couette flow , Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 219 (2016), no. 3, 1087–1159

    work page 2016

Show all 35 references
  1. [9]

    Beekie and S

    R. Beekie and S. He, Transition threshold for strictly monotone shear flows in so bolev spaces (2024), available at 2409.09219

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Bianchini, M

    R. Bianchini, M. Coti Zelati, and M. Dolce, Linear inviscid damping for shear flows near couette in the 2d stably stratified regime, Indiana University Mathematics Journal 71 (2022), 1467–1504. [11] , Symmetrization and asymptotic stability in non-homogeneo us fluids around strat...

    2022 arXiv

  3. [12]

    Chen and R

    T. Chen and R. Zi, On the sobolev stability threshold for shear flows near couet te in 2d mhd equations , Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh: Section A Mathematics (2024), 1 –51

    2024

  4. [13]

    Coti Zelati and T

    M. Coti Zelati and T. Gallay, Enhanced dissipation and taylor dispersion in higher-dime nsional parallel shear flows , Journal of the London Mathematical Society 108 (2023), no. 4, 1358–1392. 62

    2023

  5. [14]

    Coti Zelati and M

    M. Coti Zelati and M. Nualart, Explicit solutions and linear inviscid damping in the euler -boussinesq equation near a stratified couette flow in the periodic strip (2023), available at 2309.08419

    2023 arXiv

  6. [15]

    , Limiting absorption principles and linear inviscid dampin g in the euler-boussinesq system in the periodic channel (2023), available at 2309.08445

    2023 arXiv

  7. [16]

    Howard, Noe on a paper of John

    N. Howard, Noe on a paper of John. W Wiles , J. Fluid Mech. 10 (1961), 509–512

    1961

  8. [17]

    Kelvin, Stability of fluid motion - rectilinear motion of viscous flui d between two parallel plates , The Philosophical Magazine 24 (1887), 188 –196

    L. Kelvin, Stability of fluid motion - rectilinear motion of viscous flui d between two parallel plates , The Philosophical Magazine 24 (1887), 188 –196

  9. [18]

    Knobel and C

    N. Knobel and C. Zillinger, On the sobolev stability threshold for the 2d mhd equations w ith horizontal magnetic dissipation (2023), available at 2309.00496

    2023 arXiv

  10. [19]

    Masmoudi, B Said-Houari, and W

    N. Masmoudi, B Said-Houari, and W. Zhao, Stability of the couette flow for a 2d boussinesq system witho ut thermal diffusivity , Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 245 (2022), no. 2, 645–752

    2022

  11. [20]

    Masmoudi, Z

    N. Masmoudi, Z. Zhai, and W. Zhao, Asymptotic stability for two-dimensional boussinesq syst ems around the couette flow in a finite channel , Journal of Functional Analysis 284 (2023), no. 1, 109736

    2023

  12. [21]

    Masmoudi and W

    N. Masmoudi and W. Zhao, Stability threshold of two-dimensional couette flow in sobo lev spaces , Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e C Analyse non lin´ eaire39 (2022), no. 2, 245–325

    2022

  13. [22]

    3, 1093–1175

    , Nonlinear inviscid damping for a class of monotone shear flow s in a finite channel , Annals of Mathematics 199 (2024), no. 3, 1093–1175

    2024

  14. [23]

    Miles, On the stability of heterogeneous shear flows , J

    J. Miles, On the stability of heterogeneous shear flows , J. Fluid Mech. 10 (1961), 496–508

    1961

  15. [24]

    Niu and W

    B. Niu and W. Zhao, Improved stability threshold of the two-dimensional couet te flow for navier-stokes-boussinesq systems via quasi-linearization (2024), available at 2409.16216

    2024 arXiv

  16. [25]

    D. D. Ryutov, Landau damping: half a century with the great discovery , Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion 41 (1999), no. 3A

    1999

  17. [26]

    G. I. Taylor, Dispersion of soluble matter in solvent flowing slowly throu gh a tube , Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A 219 (1953), 186–203

    1953

  18. [27]

    , Dispersion of matter in turbulent flow through a tube , Proceedings of the Royals Society of London A 223 (1954), 446–468

    1954

  19. [28]

    W ang and Z

    F. W ang and Z. Zhang, The stability threshold for 2d mhd equations around couette with general viscosity and magnetic resistivity (2024), available at 2410.20404

    2024 arXiv

  20. [29]

    W ang, Enhanced dissipation and stability of poiseuille flow for tw o-dimensional boussinesq system (2024), available at 2405.11787

    G. W ang, Enhanced dissipation and stability of poiseuille flow for tw o-dimensional boussinesq system (2024), available at 2405.11787

    2024 arXiv

  21. [30]

    W ang and W

    G. W ang and W. W ang, Transition threshold for the 2-d couette flow in whole space v ia green ’s function (2024), available at 2404.11878

    2024 arXiv

  22. [31]

    Yang and Z

    J. Yang and Z. Lin, Linear inviscid damping for couette flow in stratified fluid , Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics 20 (2017), 445–472

    2017

  23. [32]

    Coti Zelati and A

    M. Coti Zelati and A. Del Zotto, Suppression of lift-up effect in the 3d boussinesq equations around a stably stratified couette flow , Quarterly of Applied Mathematics (2024)

    2024

  24. [33]

    Zhai and W

    C. Zhai and W. Zhao, Stability threshold of the couette flow for navier–stokes bo ussinesq system with large richardson number γ 2 ≥ 1 4 , SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 55 (2023), no. 2, 1284–1318, available at https://doi.org/10.1137/22M1495160

    2023 doi

  25. [34]

    Zhang and R

    Z. Zhang and R. Zi, Stability threshold of couette flow for 2d boussinesq equati ons in sobolev spaces , Journal de Math´ ematiques Pures et Appliqu´ ees179 (2023), 123 –182

    2023

  26. [35]

    Zhao and R

    W. Zhao and R. Zi, Asymptotic stability of couette flow in a strong uniform magn etic field for the euler-mhd system , Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis 248 (2024)

    2024

  27. [36]

    Zillinger, On enhanced dissipation for the boussinesq equations , Journal of Differential Equations 282 (2021), 507–445

    C. Zillinger, On enhanced dissipation for the boussinesq equations , Journal of Differential Equations 282 (2021), 507–445. 63

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.