Quantum Geometry-Driven Nonlinear Spin Currents in Floquet Non-Hermitian Altermagnets

arxiv: 2605.15541 · v1 · pith:UKBN4U3Enew · submitted 2026-05-15 · ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

Quantum Geometry-Driven Nonlinear Spin Currents in Floquet Non-Hermitian Altermagnets

Kai Chen , Jie Zhu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-19 14:20 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.mes-hall cond-mat.mtrl-sci

keywords altermagnetsnon-Hermitian systemsFloquet engineeringquantum metricnonlinear spin currentsspintronicsBerry curvature

0 comments p. Extension

pith:UKBN4U3E Add to your LaTeX paper

What is a Pith Number?

\usepackage{pith}
\pithnumber{UKBN4U3E}

Prints a linked pith:UKBN4U3E badge after your title and writes the identifier into PDF metadata. Compiles on arXiv with no extra files. Learn more

The pith

In Floquet non-Hermitian d-wave altermagnets the nonlinear spin conductivity is overwhelmingly dominated by the bare quantum metric.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper derives a general analytical expression for nonlinear spin currents that holds in non-Hermitian phases possessing a spectral line gap. This expression cleanly decomposes the intrinsic response into separate contributions from the quantum metric, Berry curvature, and Berry connection dipole. When the formula is applied to a periodically driven non-Hermitian d-wave altermagnet, the quantum metric term accounts for the vast majority of the nonlinear spin conductivity. Changing the polarization of the driving optical field is shown to tune the magnitude and even reverse the direction of both longitudinal and transverse spin currents. A sympathetic reader cares because the result supplies a concrete route to optically control spin transport in altermagnets by exploiting their quantum geometry.

Core claim

Applying the derived expression to a Floquet non-Hermitian d-wave altermagnet shows that the nonlinear spin conductivity is overwhelmingly dominated by the bare quantum metric, while the optical polarization actively tunes and can strictly reverse the directions of both longitudinal and transverse spin currents.

What carries the argument

The general analytical expression for nonlinear spin currents in non-Hermitian phases with a spectral line gap, which separates the response into quantum metric, Berry curvature, and Berry connection dipole contributions.

If this is right

Periodic optical driving combined with non-Hermiticity provides tunable control over spin responses in altermagnets.
The polarization of the driving field can actively tune and even strictly reverse the direction of longitudinal and transverse spin currents.
The quantum geometric framework enables optical manipulation of nonlinear spin transport in advanced magnetic materials.
Focus on engineering the quantum metric offers the most direct route to large nonlinear spin responses in these systems.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The same separation might allow similar quantum-metric dominance to appear in other non-Hermitian Floquet systems beyond d-wave altermagnets.
If the line-gap condition is met in fabricated devices, light polarization could serve as a practical knob for reconfigurable spintronic components.
The result suggests testing whether quantum metric dominance persists when the driving frequency or dissipation strength is varied experimentally.

Load-bearing premise

The derivation assumes a non-Hermitian phase that possesses a spectral line gap; if the gap closes or becomes a point gap the clean separation into geometric terms no longer holds.

What would settle it

Measure the nonlinear spin conductivity while tuning parameters to close the spectral line gap and check whether the dominance of the bare quantum metric contribution disappears.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2605.15541 by Jie Zhu, Kai Chen.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: Chemical potential dependence of the nonlinear spin [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Figure 3: Optical field’s polarization dependence of the nonlinear [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

Altermagnets are rapidly emerging as a highly promising platform for spintronics, yet dynamically controlling their spin responses remains a fundamental challenge. In this work, we demonstrate that introducing periodic optical driving and non-Hermiticity provides a powerful route to achieve tunable control over these systems. We derive a general analytical expression for nonlinear spin currents in non-Hermitian phases with a spectral line gap, revealing that the intrinsic response cleanly separates into quantum metric, Berry curvature, and Berry connection dipole contributions. Applying this formalism to a Floquet non-Hermitian $d$-wave altermagnet, we uncover that the nonlinear spin conductivity is overwhelmingly dominated by the bare quantum metric. Furthermore, we show that the optical field's polarization can actively tune -- and even strictly reverse -- the direction of both longitudinal and transverse spin currents. Our work establishes a quantum geometric framework for the optical manipulation of nonlinear spin transport in advanced magnetic materials.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The paper derives a geometric split for nonlinear spin currents in non-Hermitian Floquet altermagnets and claims quantum-metric dominance in a d-wave case, plus polarization reversal of the currents.

read the letter

The main thing here is that the authors give an analytical decomposition of nonlinear spin conductivity into quantum metric, Berry curvature, and Berry connection dipole pieces for non-Hermitian phases that have a spectral line gap, then apply it to a driven d-wave altermagnet where the bare metric term dominates and light polarization can reverse both longitudinal and transverse currents. The combination of Floquet driving, non-Hermiticity, and altermagnetic order for this purpose is new, and the clean separation under the stated gap condition is a useful organizing step if it survives scrutiny. The reversal prediction is concrete enough to be checked in experiment, which is a plus for the spintronics angle. The soft spot is exactly the one flagged in the stress-test note: the decomposition only holds inside the line-gap regime, yet Floquet plus non-Hermiticity often produces point gaps or gap closings instead. Without the explicit Hamiltonian, the quasienergy spectrum plots, or any numerical check that the model stays in the required regime, it is hard to know whether the dominance result is robust or just an artifact of the assumption. The abstract alone does not resolve this, so the central claim rests on unshown details. This is for theorists working on geometric transport in driven or non-Hermitian magnets and for experimentalists looking for optical knobs on altermagnet spin responses. A reader who already follows quantum-metric effects in spintronics will get the most out of the framework and the tuning result. The work is coherent enough on its own terms to deserve a serious referee, even though the gap verification and explicit derivations will need to be supplied. I would send it to review and ask the referees to focus first on whether the line-gap condition is actually satisfied in the model.

Referee Report

1 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript derives a general analytical expression for nonlinear spin currents in non-Hermitian phases possessing a spectral line gap, showing a clean decomposition into quantum metric, Berry curvature, and Berry connection dipole contributions. It then applies this formalism to a Floquet non-Hermitian d-wave altermagnet, reporting that the nonlinear spin conductivity is overwhelmingly dominated by the bare quantum metric term, while the optical field polarization can tune and even reverse both longitudinal and transverse spin currents.

Significance. If the line-gap assumption holds and the dominance result is verified in the specific model, the work would provide a quantum-geometric route to optically control nonlinear spin transport in altermagnets, potentially advancing spintronic applications by highlighting the role of the quantum metric under combined Floquet driving and non-Hermiticity.

major comments (1)

[Application to Floquet non-Hermitian d-wave altermagnet] Application section (Floquet non-Hermitian d-wave altermagnet): The reported overwhelming dominance of the bare quantum metric in the nonlinear spin conductivity rests on the general decomposition, which is derived exclusively for non-Hermitian phases with a spectral line gap. The manuscript does not explicitly confirm that the quasienergy spectrum remains in the line-gap regime (rather than exhibiting point gaps or gap closings) for the chosen driving amplitude, frequency, and non-Hermitian strength; without this verification the dominance claim does not follow from the derived expression.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract] The abstract states the general analytical expression without referencing the specific equation number or derivation outline; adding a forward reference to the relevant equation in the main text would improve readability.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive feedback. We address the single major comment below and will make the requested verification explicit in the revised manuscript.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Application to Floquet non-Hermitian d-wave altermagnet] Application section (Floquet non-Hermitian d-wave altermagnet): The reported overwhelming dominance of the bare quantum metric in the nonlinear spin conductivity rests on the general decomposition, which is derived exclusively for non-Hermitian phases with a spectral line gap. The manuscript does not explicitly confirm that the quasienergy spectrum remains in the line-gap regime (rather than exhibiting point gaps or gap closings) for the chosen driving amplitude, frequency, and non-Hermitian strength; without this verification the dominance claim does not follow from the derived expression.

Authors: We agree that the analytical decomposition applies strictly under the line-gap assumption and that explicit confirmation is needed for the specific parameters. In the revised manuscript we will add a dedicated paragraph (and, if space permits, a supplementary figure) in the application section that plots the quasienergy spectrum versus momentum for the driving amplitude, frequency, and non-Hermitian strength used in the conductivity calculations. This will demonstrate the persistence of the line gap and the absence of point-gap or gap-closing behavior, thereby placing the reported dominance of the bare quantum metric on firm ground within the regime of validity of the derived expression. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity in quantum geometry derivation for nonlinear spin currents

full rationale

The paper derives a general analytical expression separating nonlinear spin conductivity into quantum metric, Berry curvature, and Berry connection dipole contributions under the assumption of a spectral line gap in non-Hermitian phases. This separation follows from standard definitions of quantum geometric quantities applied to the Floquet-driven system rather than any self-definitional equivalence or fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The reported dominance of the bare quantum metric in the d-wave altermagnet application emerges as a computed outcome of the formalism, not by construction from the inputs. No load-bearing self-citations, uniqueness theorems imported from the authors' prior work, or ansatzes smuggled via citation are present in the abstract or described derivation chain. The result is therefore self-contained and independent of the specific driving amplitude or gap size within the stated regime.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

The work rests on standard quantum-geometric transport theory and Floquet theory for periodically driven systems; no new free parameters or invented entities are introduced in the abstract.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Existence of a spectral line gap in the non-Hermitian Floquet spectrum
Invoked to guarantee clean separation of geometric contributions (abstract, general analytical expression paragraph)
standard math Validity of the semiclassical or Kubo-formula derivation for nonlinear response in non-Hermitian bands
Underlying the analytical expression for spin conductivity

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5690 in / 1460 out tokens · 28935 ms · 2026-05-19T14:20:37.786831+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/AlexanderDuality.lean alexander_duality_circle_linking unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

We derive a general analytical expression for nonlinear spin currents in non-Hermitian phases with a spectral line gap, revealing that the intrinsic response cleanly separates into quantum metric, Berry curvature, and Berry connection dipole contributions.
IndisputableMonolith/Cost/FunctionalEquation.lean washburn_uniqueness_aczel unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

the nonlinear spin conductivity is overwhelmingly dominated by the bare quantum metric

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

59 extracted references · 59 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

[1]

C. M. Bender, Reports on Progress in Physics70, 947 (2007)

work page 2007
[2]

Ashida, Z

Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Advances in Physics 69, 249 (2020)

work page 2020
[3]

E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Reviews of Modern Physics93, 015005 (2021)

work page 2021
[4]

Okuma, K

N. Okuma, K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and M. Sato, Phys- ical review letters124, 086801 (2020)

work page 2020
[5]

Zhang, Z

K. Zhang, Z. Yang, and C. Fang, Nature communications 13, 2496 (2022)

work page 2022
[6]

K. Ding, C. Fang, and G. Ma, Nature Reviews Physics4, 745 (2022)

work page 2022
[7]

Kawabata, K

K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, Physi- cal Review X9, 041015 (2019)

work page 2019
[8]

Kawabata, T

K. Kawabata, T. Bessho, and M. Sato, Physical review letters123, 066405 (2019)

work page 2019
[9]

Chen and J

K. Chen and J. Zhu, Physical Review B113, 115135 (2026)

work page 2026
[10]

Chen and A

K. Chen and A. B. Khanikaev, Physical Review B105, L081112 (2022)

work page 2022
[11]

Altland and M

A. Altland and M. R. Zirnbauer, Physical Review B55, 1142 (1997)

work page 1997
[12]

Zhou and J

H. Zhou and J. Y. Lee, Physical Review B99, 235112 (2019)

work page 2019
[13]

Okuma and M

N. Okuma and M. Sato, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics14, 83 (2023)

work page 2023
[14]

Törmä, Physical Review Letters131, 240001 (2023)

P. Törmä, Physical Review Letters131, 240001 (2023)

work page 2023
[15]

A. Gao, N. Nagaosa, N. Ni, and S.-Y. Xu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.00469 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[16]

Jiang, T

Y. Jiang, T. Holder, and B. Yan, Reports on Progress in Physics88, 076502 (2025)

work page 2025
[17]

Liu, X.-B

T. Liu, X.-B. Qiang, H.-Z. Lu, and X. Xie, National Science Review12, nwae334 (2025)

work page 2025
[18]

K. Chen, B. Karki, and P. Hosur, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.16965 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025
[19]

N. Wang, D. Kaplan, Z. Zhang, T. Holder, N. Cao, A. Wang, X. Zhou, F. Zhou, Z. Jiang, C. Zhang,et al., Nature621, 487 (2023)

work page 2023
[20]

Gao, Y.-F

A. Gao, Y.-F. Liu, J.-X. Qiu, B. Ghosh, T. V. Trevisan, Y. Onishi, C. Hu, T. Qian, H.-J. Tien, S.-W. Chen,et al., Science381, 181 (2023)

work page 2023
[21]

H. Yu, X. Li, Y.-Q. Bie, L. Yan, L. Zhou, P. Yu, and G. Yang, Nature Communications16, 7698 (2025)

work page 2025
[22]

Liu, A.-Q

X.-Y. Liu, A.-Q. Wang, D. Li, T.-Y. Zhao, X. Liao, and Z.-M. Liao, Physical Review Letters134, 026305 (2025)

work page 2025
[23]

Y. Fang, J. Cano, and S. A. A. Ghorashi, Physical Review Letters133, 106701 (2024)

work page 2024
[24]

Chen Ye, W

C. Chen Ye, W. Vleeshouwers, S. Heatley, V. Gritsev, and C. Morais Smith, Physical Review Research6, 023202 (2024)

work page 2024
[25]

K. Sim, N. Defenu, P. Molignini, and R. Chitra, Physical Review Letters131, 156501 (2023)

work page 2023
[26]

Dong, Q.-D

W. Dong, Q.-D. Jiang, and M. Baggioli, Quantum Fron- tiers5, 4 (2026)

work page 2026
[27]

Montag and T

A. Montag and T. Ozawa, Physical Review Research8, 013181 (2026)

work page 2026
[28]

Törmä, L

P. Törmä, L. Liang, and S. Peotta, Physical Review B 98, 220511 (2018)

work page 2018
[29]

S. A. Chen and K. Law, Physical Review Letters132, 026002 (2024)

work page 2024
[30]

Iskin, Physical Review A97, 033625 (2018)

M. Iskin, Physical Review A97, 033625 (2018)

work page 2018
[31]

K. Das, S. Lahiri, R. B. Atencia, D. Culcer, and A. Agar- wal, Physical Review B108, L201405 (2023)

work page 2023
[32]

Ghosh, Y

B. Ghosh, Y. Onishi, S.-Y. Xu, H. Lin, L. Fu, and A. Ban- sil, Science Advances10, eado1761 (2024)

work page 2024
[33]

Li and C.-C

Y. Li and C.-C. Liu, Physical Review Letters136, 046901 (2026)

work page 2026
[34]

K. Das, K. Ghorai, D. Culcer, and A. Agarwal, Physical review letters132, 096302 (2024)

work page 2024
[35]

Šmejkal, J

L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Physical Review X12, 040501 (2022)

work page 2022
[36]

Mazin and P

I. Mazin and P. editors, Altermagnetism — a new punch line of fundamental magnetism (2022)

work page 2022
[37]

C. Song, H. Bai, Z. Zhou, L. Han, H. Reichlova, J. H. Dil, J. Liu, X. Chen, and F. Pan, Nature Reviews Materials 10, 473 (2025)

work page 2025
[38]

Fedchenko, J

O. Fedchenko, J. Minár, A. Akashdeep, S. W. D’souza, D. Vasilyev, O. Tkach, L. Odenbreit, Q. Nguyen, D. Kut- nyakhov, N. Wind,et al., Science advances10, eadj4883 (2024)

work page 2024
[39]

Y. Guo, J. Zhang, Z. Zhu, Y.-y. Jiang, L. Jiang, C. Wu, J. Dong, X. Xu, W. He, B. He,et al., Advanced Science 11, 2400967 (2024)

work page 2024
[40]

J.-E. Lee, Y. Zhong, Q. Li, M. T. Edmonds, Z.-X. Shen, C. Hwang, and S.-K. Mo, Nano Letters25, 8969 (2025)

work page 2025
[41]

S. Lee, S. Lee, S. Jung, J. Jung, D. Kim, Y. Lee, B. Seok, J. Kim, B. G. Park, L. Šmejkal,et al., Physical review letters132, 036702 (2024)

work page 2024
[42]

S. G. Jeong, I. H. Choi, S. Nair, L. Buiarelli, B. Pour- bahari, J. Y. Oh, B. Y. Lin, J. M. LeBeau, N. Bassim, D. Hirai,et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences123, e2526641123 (2026)

work page 2026
[43]

J. Liu, X. Ma, X. Zhang, W. Jing, Z. Liu, and D. Shen, Nano Convergence13, 6 (2026)

work page 2026
[44]

I. H. Choi, S. G. Jeong, B. Jalan, and J. S. Lee, Nano Convergence13, 1 (2026)

work page 2026
[45]

Cayao, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter35, 254002 (2023)

J. Cayao, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter35, 254002 (2023)

work page 2023
[46]

Correa, M

J. Correa, M. Nowak, and A. Pezo, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.07695 (2026)

work page arXiv 2026
[47]

Light-induced Odd-parity Magnetism in Conventional Collinear Antiferromagnets

S. Huang, Z. Qin, F. Zhan, D.-H. Xu, D.-S. Ma, and R. Wang, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.20705 (2025)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025
[48]

T. Zhu, D. Zhou, H. Wang, S.-H. Wei, and J. Ruan, Physical Review Letters136, 126704 (2026)

work page 2026
[49]

Li, D.-F

B. Li, D.-F. Shao, and A. A. Kovalev, Physical Review Letters136, 166701 (2026)

work page 2026
[50]

Culcer, J

D. Culcer, J. Sinova, N. Sinitsyn, T. Jungwirth, A. Mac- Donald, and Q. Niu, Physical review letters93, 046602 (2004). 6

work page 2004
[51]

Goldman and J

N. Goldman and J. Dalibard, Physical review X4, 031027 (2014)

work page 2014
[52]

Eckardt and E

A. Eckardt and E. Anisimovas, New journal of physics 17, 093039 (2015)

work page 2015
[53]

Bukov, L

M. Bukov, L. D’Alessio, and A. Polkovnikov, Advances in Physics64, 139 (2015). APPENDIX FOR QUANTUM GEOMETRY-DRIVEN NONLINEAR SPIN CURRENTS IN FLOQUET NON-HERMITIAN ALTERMAGNETS Appendix A: Nonlinear Spin Currents To calculate the analytical expressions for the field-perturbed spin expectation valuessα(1) n and sα(2) n , we apply the Schrieffer-Wolff (SW)...

work page 2015
[54]

The First-Order Spin Corrections α(1) n The linear response of the spin expectation value is given by the commutator with the first-order SW generator evaluated for the target bandn: sα(1) n = [S(1),ˆsα]nn = X m̸=n S(1) nmsα mn −s α nmS(1) mn (A7) 7 Expanding this using the explicit form ofS(1) mn, we obtain: sα(1) n =−eE µ X m̸=n ALR nm,µsα mn +s α nmALR...

work page
[55]

By utilizing the covariant derivative Dν, it correctly captures how the first-order mixing between bands changes across momentum space in a strictly gauge-invariant manner

The Second-Order Spin Corrections α(2) n The second-order correction contains two parts: the commutator with the second-order generator, and the double commutator with the first-order generator: sα(2) n = [S(2),ˆsα]nn + 1 2[S(1),[S (1),ˆsα]]nn (A9) By substituting the gauge-invariant SW generators and utilizing the symmetry ofEµEν to cancel thel = n terms...

work page
[56]

As demonstrated in Ref

Integration into the Semiclassical Spin Current Having derived the relevant geometric contributions, the total intrinsic second-order DC spin currentJ α(2) int can be expressed exactly as the sum of three cross-terms arising from the perturbative expansion of the spin and velocity within the semiclassical Boltzmann framework: J α(2) int = ˆ k fk sα n ˙r(2...

work page
[57]

The system lacks inversion symmetry, which gives rise to Rashba spin-orbit coupling

The Model Hamiltonian We consider a two-dimensionald-wave altermagnet (AM) on a square lattice. The system lacks inversion symmetry, which gives rise to Rashba spin-orbit coupling. The total Hamiltonian is expressed asH(k) = H0(k) +H d AL(k) +HR(k). The kinetic term is given by H0(k) = [−2t0(cosk x + cosk y)−µ]σ 0,(B1) where t0 is the hopping amplitude an...

work page
[58]

Peierls Substitution and the Light Field To introduce a periodic driving light field, we use an elliptically polarized vector potential: A(t) =A(sinωt,cos(ωt+ϕ))(B4) where A = E0/ω is the dimensionless light amplitude (assuminge = ℏ = a = 1). Under the Peierls substitution, the crystal momenta become time-dependent: kx(t) =k x +Asin(ωt), k y(t) =k y +Acos...

work page
[59]

High-Frequency Floquet Effective Hamiltonian (Hef f) Using the Jacobi-Anger expansion,eizsin(ωt+δ) =P l Jl(z)eil(ωt+δ), we map the periodically driven system to an effective static Hamiltonian in the high-frequency limit (ω≫t0): Hef f(k) =H(k) + 1 ω [H1(k), H−1(k)](B8) By extracting the zeroth and first-order (±1) Fourier harmonics and evaluating the comm...

work page

[1] [1]

C. M. Bender, Reports on Progress in Physics70, 947 (2007)

work page 2007

[2] [2]

Ashida, Z

Y. Ashida, Z. Gong, and M. Ueda, Advances in Physics 69, 249 (2020)

work page 2020

[3] [3]

E. J. Bergholtz, J. C. Budich, and F. K. Kunst, Reviews of Modern Physics93, 015005 (2021)

work page 2021

[4] [4]

Okuma, K

N. Okuma, K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, and M. Sato, Phys- ical review letters124, 086801 (2020)

work page 2020

[5] [5]

Zhang, Z

K. Zhang, Z. Yang, and C. Fang, Nature communications 13, 2496 (2022)

work page 2022

[6] [6]

K. Ding, C. Fang, and G. Ma, Nature Reviews Physics4, 745 (2022)

work page 2022

[7] [7]

Kawabata, K

K. Kawabata, K. Shiozaki, M. Ueda, and M. Sato, Physi- cal Review X9, 041015 (2019)

work page 2019

[8] [8]

Kawabata, T

K. Kawabata, T. Bessho, and M. Sato, Physical review letters123, 066405 (2019)

work page 2019

[9] [9]

Chen and J

K. Chen and J. Zhu, Physical Review B113, 115135 (2026)

work page 2026

[10] [10]

Chen and A

K. Chen and A. B. Khanikaev, Physical Review B105, L081112 (2022)

work page 2022

[11] [11]

Altland and M

A. Altland and M. R. Zirnbauer, Physical Review B55, 1142 (1997)

work page 1997

[12] [12]

Zhou and J

H. Zhou and J. Y. Lee, Physical Review B99, 235112 (2019)

work page 2019

[13] [13]

Okuma and M

N. Okuma and M. Sato, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics14, 83 (2023)

work page 2023

[14] [14]

Törmä, Physical Review Letters131, 240001 (2023)

P. Törmä, Physical Review Letters131, 240001 (2023)

work page 2023

[15] [15]

A. Gao, N. Nagaosa, N. Ni, and S.-Y. Xu, arXiv preprint arXiv:2508.00469 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025

[16] [16]

Jiang, T

Y. Jiang, T. Holder, and B. Yan, Reports on Progress in Physics88, 076502 (2025)

work page 2025

[17] [17]

Liu, X.-B

T. Liu, X.-B. Qiang, H.-Z. Lu, and X. Xie, National Science Review12, nwae334 (2025)

work page 2025

[18] [18]

K. Chen, B. Karki, and P. Hosur, arXiv preprint arXiv:2501.16965 (2025)

work page arXiv 2025

[19] [19]

N. Wang, D. Kaplan, Z. Zhang, T. Holder, N. Cao, A. Wang, X. Zhou, F. Zhou, Z. Jiang, C. Zhang,et al., Nature621, 487 (2023)

work page 2023

[20] [20]

Gao, Y.-F

A. Gao, Y.-F. Liu, J.-X. Qiu, B. Ghosh, T. V. Trevisan, Y. Onishi, C. Hu, T. Qian, H.-J. Tien, S.-W. Chen,et al., Science381, 181 (2023)

work page 2023

[21] [21]

H. Yu, X. Li, Y.-Q. Bie, L. Yan, L. Zhou, P. Yu, and G. Yang, Nature Communications16, 7698 (2025)

work page 2025

[22] [22]

Liu, A.-Q

X.-Y. Liu, A.-Q. Wang, D. Li, T.-Y. Zhao, X. Liao, and Z.-M. Liao, Physical Review Letters134, 026305 (2025)

work page 2025

[23] [23]

Y. Fang, J. Cano, and S. A. A. Ghorashi, Physical Review Letters133, 106701 (2024)

work page 2024

[24] [24]

Chen Ye, W

C. Chen Ye, W. Vleeshouwers, S. Heatley, V. Gritsev, and C. Morais Smith, Physical Review Research6, 023202 (2024)

work page 2024

[25] [25]

K. Sim, N. Defenu, P. Molignini, and R. Chitra, Physical Review Letters131, 156501 (2023)

work page 2023

[26] [26]

Dong, Q.-D

W. Dong, Q.-D. Jiang, and M. Baggioli, Quantum Fron- tiers5, 4 (2026)

work page 2026

[27] [27]

Montag and T

A. Montag and T. Ozawa, Physical Review Research8, 013181 (2026)

work page 2026

[28] [28]

Törmä, L

P. Törmä, L. Liang, and S. Peotta, Physical Review B 98, 220511 (2018)

work page 2018

[29] [29]

S. A. Chen and K. Law, Physical Review Letters132, 026002 (2024)

work page 2024

[30] [30]

Iskin, Physical Review A97, 033625 (2018)

M. Iskin, Physical Review A97, 033625 (2018)

work page 2018

[31] [31]

K. Das, S. Lahiri, R. B. Atencia, D. Culcer, and A. Agar- wal, Physical Review B108, L201405 (2023)

work page 2023

[32] [32]

Ghosh, Y

B. Ghosh, Y. Onishi, S.-Y. Xu, H. Lin, L. Fu, and A. Ban- sil, Science Advances10, eado1761 (2024)

work page 2024

[33] [33]

Li and C.-C

Y. Li and C.-C. Liu, Physical Review Letters136, 046901 (2026)

work page 2026

[34] [34]

K. Das, K. Ghorai, D. Culcer, and A. Agarwal, Physical review letters132, 096302 (2024)

work page 2024

[35] [35]

Šmejkal, J

L. Šmejkal, J. Sinova, and T. Jungwirth, Physical Review X12, 040501 (2022)

work page 2022

[36] [36]

Mazin and P

I. Mazin and P. editors, Altermagnetism — a new punch line of fundamental magnetism (2022)

work page 2022

[37] [37]

C. Song, H. Bai, Z. Zhou, L. Han, H. Reichlova, J. H. Dil, J. Liu, X. Chen, and F. Pan, Nature Reviews Materials 10, 473 (2025)

work page 2025

[38] [38]

Fedchenko, J

O. Fedchenko, J. Minár, A. Akashdeep, S. W. D’souza, D. Vasilyev, O. Tkach, L. Odenbreit, Q. Nguyen, D. Kut- nyakhov, N. Wind,et al., Science advances10, eadj4883 (2024)

work page 2024

[39] [39]

Y. Guo, J. Zhang, Z. Zhu, Y.-y. Jiang, L. Jiang, C. Wu, J. Dong, X. Xu, W. He, B. He,et al., Advanced Science 11, 2400967 (2024)

work page 2024

[40] [40]

J.-E. Lee, Y. Zhong, Q. Li, M. T. Edmonds, Z.-X. Shen, C. Hwang, and S.-K. Mo, Nano Letters25, 8969 (2025)

work page 2025

[41] [41]

S. Lee, S. Lee, S. Jung, J. Jung, D. Kim, Y. Lee, B. Seok, J. Kim, B. G. Park, L. Šmejkal,et al., Physical review letters132, 036702 (2024)

work page 2024

[42] [42]

S. G. Jeong, I. H. Choi, S. Nair, L. Buiarelli, B. Pour- bahari, J. Y. Oh, B. Y. Lin, J. M. LeBeau, N. Bassim, D. Hirai,et al., Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences123, e2526641123 (2026)

work page 2026

[43] [43]

J. Liu, X. Ma, X. Zhang, W. Jing, Z. Liu, and D. Shen, Nano Convergence13, 6 (2026)

work page 2026

[44] [44]

I. H. Choi, S. G. Jeong, B. Jalan, and J. S. Lee, Nano Convergence13, 1 (2026)

work page 2026

[45] [45]

Cayao, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter35, 254002 (2023)

J. Cayao, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter35, 254002 (2023)

work page 2023

[46] [46]

Correa, M

J. Correa, M. Nowak, and A. Pezo, arXiv preprint arXiv:2603.07695 (2026)

work page arXiv 2026

[47] [47]

Light-induced Odd-parity Magnetism in Conventional Collinear Antiferromagnets

S. Huang, Z. Qin, F. Zhan, D.-H. Xu, D.-S. Ma, and R. Wang, arXiv preprint arXiv:2507.20705 (2025)

work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

[48] [48]

T. Zhu, D. Zhou, H. Wang, S.-H. Wei, and J. Ruan, Physical Review Letters136, 126704 (2026)

work page 2026

[49] [49]

Li, D.-F

B. Li, D.-F. Shao, and A. A. Kovalev, Physical Review Letters136, 166701 (2026)

work page 2026

[50] [50]

Culcer, J

D. Culcer, J. Sinova, N. Sinitsyn, T. Jungwirth, A. Mac- Donald, and Q. Niu, Physical review letters93, 046602 (2004). 6

work page 2004

[51] [51]

Goldman and J

N. Goldman and J. Dalibard, Physical review X4, 031027 (2014)

work page 2014

[52] [52]

Eckardt and E

A. Eckardt and E. Anisimovas, New journal of physics 17, 093039 (2015)

work page 2015

[53] [53]

Bukov, L

M. Bukov, L. D’Alessio, and A. Polkovnikov, Advances in Physics64, 139 (2015). APPENDIX FOR QUANTUM GEOMETRY-DRIVEN NONLINEAR SPIN CURRENTS IN FLOQUET NON-HERMITIAN ALTERMAGNETS Appendix A: Nonlinear Spin Currents To calculate the analytical expressions for the field-perturbed spin expectation valuessα(1) n and sα(2) n , we apply the Schrieffer-Wolff (SW)...

work page 2015

[54] [54]

The First-Order Spin Corrections α(1) n The linear response of the spin expectation value is given by the commutator with the first-order SW generator evaluated for the target bandn: sα(1) n = [S(1),ˆsα]nn = X m̸=n S(1) nmsα mn −s α nmS(1) mn (A7) 7 Expanding this using the explicit form ofS(1) mn, we obtain: sα(1) n =−eE µ X m̸=n ALR nm,µsα mn +s α nmALR...

work page

[55] [55]

By utilizing the covariant derivative Dν, it correctly captures how the first-order mixing between bands changes across momentum space in a strictly gauge-invariant manner

The Second-Order Spin Corrections α(2) n The second-order correction contains two parts: the commutator with the second-order generator, and the double commutator with the first-order generator: sα(2) n = [S(2),ˆsα]nn + 1 2[S(1),[S (1),ˆsα]]nn (A9) By substituting the gauge-invariant SW generators and utilizing the symmetry ofEµEν to cancel thel = n terms...

work page

[56] [56]

As demonstrated in Ref

Integration into the Semiclassical Spin Current Having derived the relevant geometric contributions, the total intrinsic second-order DC spin currentJ α(2) int can be expressed exactly as the sum of three cross-terms arising from the perturbative expansion of the spin and velocity within the semiclassical Boltzmann framework: J α(2) int = ˆ k fk sα n ˙r(2...

work page

[57] [57]

The system lacks inversion symmetry, which gives rise to Rashba spin-orbit coupling

The Model Hamiltonian We consider a two-dimensionald-wave altermagnet (AM) on a square lattice. The system lacks inversion symmetry, which gives rise to Rashba spin-orbit coupling. The total Hamiltonian is expressed asH(k) = H0(k) +H d AL(k) +HR(k). The kinetic term is given by H0(k) = [−2t0(cosk x + cosk y)−µ]σ 0,(B1) where t0 is the hopping amplitude an...

work page

[58] [58]

Peierls Substitution and the Light Field To introduce a periodic driving light field, we use an elliptically polarized vector potential: A(t) =A(sinωt,cos(ωt+ϕ))(B4) where A = E0/ω is the dimensionless light amplitude (assuminge = ℏ = a = 1). Under the Peierls substitution, the crystal momenta become time-dependent: kx(t) =k x +Asin(ωt), k y(t) =k y +Acos...

work page

[59] [59]

High-Frequency Floquet Effective Hamiltonian (Hef f) Using the Jacobi-Anger expansion,eizsin(ωt+δ) =P l Jl(z)eil(ωt+δ), we map the periodically driven system to an effective static Hamiltonian in the high-frequency limit (ω≫t0): Hef f(k) =H(k) + 1 ω [H1(k), H−1(k)](B8) By extracting the zeroth and first-order (±1) Fourier harmonics and evaluating the comm...

work page