Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 72 references

High-Frequency Magnetohydrodynamic Waves with Substantial Energy in the Solar Polar Corona

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-01 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read High-frequency magnetohydrodynamic waves in polar coronal plumes are abundant and carry an energy flux 2.6 times higher than lower-cadence instruments indicate.

desk verdict Solid statistical detection of a sub-100s kink wave population, but the 'substantial energy' claim hinges on a filling factor the paper itself says is out of range. read the letter →

arxiv 2607.25799 v1 pith:UKE4TVYL submitted 2026-07-28 astro-ph.SR physics.space-ph

Yuhang Gao , Hui Tian , Richard Morton , Tom Van Doorsselaere , Daye Lim , Mingzhe Guo , Jiansen He , Zhenyong Hou This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.SRphysics.space-ph
keywords solarwindMHDwaveskinkcoronalplumespolarholeshigh-frequencyOrbiterEUIheating
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that high-frequency magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) waves—magnetic oscillations in the ionized coronal plasma—are far more common in polar coronal plumes than previously thought, and that they carry enough energy to matter for heating the corona and driving the fast solar wind. Using 5-second-cadence images from Solar Orbiter's Extreme Ultraviolet Imager, it detects 2,318 propagating kink waves (transverse oscillations of magnetic flux tubes), 38% of which have periods shorter than 100 seconds, whereas simultaneous lower-resolution SDO/AIA data show only 9% in that range. The EUI-derived energy flux is 30–50 W/m², about 2.6 times the AIA-derived 11–19 W/m², and the high-frequency band (10–30 mHz) holds more than twice the integrated wave power of the low-frequency band. If correct, these results close a long-standing observational gap between wave-driven models of the fast solar wind and actual detections, and they show how much wave energy can be hidden by insufficient temporal and spatial resolution.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing tool is the combination of high-cadence, high-spatial-resolution extreme-ultraviolet imaging (Solar Orbiter/EUI, 5-second cadence, ~0.21 Mm pixels) with automated wave tracking on time-distance maps constructed along 17 slits at heights of 8–41 Mm. The central physical object is the propagating kink wave—a transverse oscillation of a magnetic flux tube treated as an Alfvénic disturbance—whose velocity amplitude is converted to an energy flux using F = f⟨ρ⟩v_rms²c_k, with f the filling factor, ⟨ρ⟩ the mean density, and c_k the kink speed (300–500 km/s). The power spectral density is formed from the product of mean-square velocity amplitude and occurrence probability per frequ

What would settle it

Measure the true filling factor f of the oscillating plume threads in the 8–41 Mm height range, for example from stereoscopic EUV observations of the same plumes. If f is near the 2–3.4% value suggested by earlier stereoscopic work rather than the adopted 0.5, Equation (1) gives an energy flux 5–10 times smaller than 30–50 W/m², so the 'substantial energy' claim in the title and abstract would not be supported on its own terms.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes, on its own terms, that a statistically significant population of propagating kink waves with periods below 100 seconds exists in the polar coronal plume region observed by Solar Orbiter's EUI on 2021 September 14. The detection rests on automated identification of oscillating threads in time-distance maps at heights of 8–41 Mm, yielding 2,318 wave events. Kernel-density period distributions show that 57% of EUI events have periods under 150 seconds and 38% under 100 seconds, versus 31% and 9% in co-temporal AIA data; the RMS velocity amplitudes are 18.2 km/s versus 11.3 km/s. Under the paper's adopted parameters, the EUI wave energy flux is 30–50 W/m², roughly 2.6 time

Load-bearing premise

The absolute energy-flux value hinges on the assumed filling factor f = 0.5 for oscillating plume threads, even though the paper's 'Uncertainties in the energy flux estimation' section states the flux formula is strictly valid only for f ≲ 10% and cites stereoscopic estimates of f ≈ 2–3.4% that would lower the quoted flux by a factor of 5–10.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Wave energy budgets of the lower corona derived from 12-second-cadence images are systematically too low, by roughly a factor of 2.6 in plume regions.
  • The observed high-frequency band carries more than twice the integrated power of the low-frequency band, so wave-driven solar wind models should include a substantial 10–30 mHz component rather than extrapolating from periods of minutes.
  • Because resonant absorption damps kink waves more strongly at higher frequencies (damping length ∝ 1/f), these waves can deposit energy lower in the corona than low-frequency waves, acting as a local heating channel.
  • The detected 10–50 mHz waves shorten the frequency gap that turbulent cascade must bridge before wave energy reaches ion-cyclotron scales, strengthening the plausibility of wave-driven fast-solar-wind models.
  • Even at the quoted 30–50 W/m², the flux is below the roughly 500 W/m² thought necessary to explain coronal heating and wind acceleration, so the paper itself concludes that additional wave populations, such as torsional Alfvén waves, are still required.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The cadence/resolution bias quantified here should also affect flux estimates in other open-field structures and possibly in stellar coronae, so many published wave-flux values may be lower bounds.
  • Re-running the same automated pipeline on additional EUI polar-coronal-hole observations would test whether the 18-minute 2021 September 14 window is representative; a similarly rich short-period population should appear if the claim is general.
  • If the true filling factor is closer to 2–3.4%, the absolute flux drops by 5–10 times, yet the EUI-to-AIA ratio of roughly 2.6 persists; the paper's 'substantial energy' language would then describe the relative gain from high cadence, not the absolute plume budget.
  • The apparent spectral turning point near 13 mHz shifts to approximately 10 mHz when EUI data are degraded to AIA resolution, so the paper's own caution implies that apparent spectral peaks should be tested with forward models of detection efficiency before being read as preferred injection frequencies.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper analyzes high-cadence EUI 17.4 nm images of a north polar coronal hole on 2021 September 14, automatically detecting 2318 propagating kink-wave events in plume threads with the NUWT code and comparing them with 560 co-temporal SDO/AIA events. The authors report that 38% of EUI events have periods <100 s versus 9% for AIA, larger EUI velocity amplitudes, and a power spectrum with substantially more power above ~10 mHz. Using a standard flux formula with filling factor f=0.5, density 3e-13 kg m^-3, and kink speed 300-500 km/s, they quote EUI and AIA energy fluxes of 30-50 and 11-19 W m^-2, concluding that high-frequency waves carry substantial energy flux and may contribute to fast-solar-wind acceleration. The paper includes an explicit discussion of uncertainties in the absolute flux and of possible wave origins.

Significance. The paper's core detection claim is strong and valuable: a large-sample, bootstrap-uncertaintied detection of a previously hidden short-period kink-wave population in polar plumes, supported by a resolution-degradation test and independent manual detections in Baweja et al. (2025). The relative EUI/AIA enhancement (≈2.6× in inferred flux) and the high-frequency fraction of the distribution are robust. However, the absolute 'substantial energy' claim is not yet supported. The adopted f=0.5 lies outside the stated validity range of Eq. (1), and the paper's own cited stereoscopic filling factors (2-3.4%) would reduce the quoted EUI flux by an order of magnitude or more, to a few W m^-2. The detection is important even without the absolute-budget claim; the title, abstract, and conclusions should be aligned with what the data actually establish.

major comments (2)
  1. [Uncertainties in the energy flux estimation (Eq. 1, Table 1)] The absolute energy-flux claim in the title and abstract depends on Eq. (1) evaluated with f=0.5. The paper itself states that Eq. (1) is strictly valid only for f≲10% and cites Huang et al. (2021) stereoscopic measurements of f≈2-3.4% for plume threads. Using f=0.03 gives 30-50 W m^-2 × (0.03/0.5) ≈ 1.8-3 W m^-2, before the additional 30-40% intermittency reduction; using f=0.1 gives 6-10 W m^-2. These values are one to two orders of magnitude below the ~500 W m^-2 quoted as needed for fast-solar-wind acceleration and do not justify 'substantial energy' in the title's sense. Calling f=0.5 'conservative' is therefore inaccurate; it is optimistic by a factor of 5-15 relative to the paper's own cited constraints. I recommend either (a) revising the title, abstract, and concluding statements to refer to the relative EUI-vs-AIA enhancement and/or the high-frequency fraction of wave energy, o
  2. [Power spectrum (Results, Fig. 4c)] The PSD in Fig. 4(c) is constructed from detected events as the product of mean-square velocity amplitude and normalized occurrence probability (KDE) and is labeled in arbitrary units. The statement that integrated EUI power in 10-30 mHz exceeds 2-10 mHz by a factor >2 is therefore a relative statement about the detected population, not a direct measure of physical energy flux. It cannot, by itself, support the abstract's claim that high-frequency waves carry 'substantial energy flux'; that requires the flux integration in Eq. (1) with a reliable filling factor. The text should either present the PSD in calibrated units or explicitly restrict the 'substantial energy' language to the relative distribution within the detected sample.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Data and Methods] Typo: 'the Fourier transform is applided' should be 'applied'.
  2. [Figure 3 caption / text] Several spacing issues: 'the lefty-axis' and 'sklearn.neighbors.KernelDensityfrom' should be 'left y-axis' and 'KernelDensity from'.
  3. [Conclusion] The abbreviation 'PKW' appears without definition; introduce 'propagating kink waves (PKW)' when first used.
  4. [Figure 1 caption] The caption refers to panels (E1) and (E2) but the composite figure labels are not described; please clarify which TD maps correspond to which slit positions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: EUI/AIA wave detection and PSD are direct measurements; the energy-flux equation is a standard formula with disclosed parameter assumptions, not a fit to its own output.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are observational: NUWT detects 2318 transverse wave events in EUI and 560 in AIA, and direct measurements yield period/amplitude distributions, RMS velocities, and power spectra. No quantity used as an input is also the predicted output. The energy flux F=f<rho>v_rms^2 c_k (Eq. 1) is a standard MHD wave flux formula evaluated with independently chosen parameters (f=0.5, <rho>=3e-13 kg/m^3, c_k=300-500 km/s); the only fitted/measured quantity in it is v_rms, and Eq. (1) is not solved for v_rms or used to predict the detected population. The EUI/AIA flux ratio ~2.6 follows directly from the measured (v_rms)^2 ratio and does not depend on the adopted f, density, or c_k. The paper explicitly discloses that Eq. (1) is strictly valid for f<~10% and that f=0.5 may be too high; this is an acknowledged uncertainty/correctness risk, not a circular reduction. Self-citations (NUWT [20], CoMP-based kink speeds [13,16-18], density [13]) are used as empirical calibrations from prior published observations, not as an unverified theorem forbidding alternatives. The PSD is constructed from measured event frequencies and amplitudes plus a KDE of occurrence; integrating it over frequency bands is descriptive, not a prediction. No equation is equivalent to its inputs by construction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Hence a non-finding is appropriate.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No invented entities. The energy-flux central number is an input-dependent estimate; all inputs are adopted rather than fitted. The detection statistics depend on NUWT thresholds.

free parameters (4)
  • filling factor f = 0.5
    Adopted in Eq (1); paper admits equation strictly valid only for f≲10% and that stereoscopic constraints suggest f≈2–3.4%, reducing absolute flux 5–10×.
  • mean density = 3e-13 kg m^-3
    Selected from prior estimates near 1.01–1.06 R_sun; linear scaling means uncertainty transfers directly to flux.
  • kink speed c_k = 300–500 km s^-1
    Range taken from CoMP measurements at greater heights; not directly constrained in the 7.6–41.2 Mm layer.
  • minimum thread length = 60 time steps (300 s)
    NUWT detection threshold; controls sample composition. The paper's high-frequency population emerges under this constraint, so sample statistics depend on it.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Energy-flux formula Eq (1) with filling factor f gives the wave energy flux
    Used for the 30–50 W m^-2 central number; the paper notes it is strictly valid only for f≲10%.
  • domain assumption Detected transverse oscillations are propagating kink (Alfvénic) waves
    Standard interpretation in plume studies; if some events are standing modes or apparent motions, flux and period statistics change.
  • domain assumption √2 polarization factor converts plane-of-sky velocity to total amplitude
    Assumes random wave polarization; adopted from prior literature.
  • domain assumption Projection effects average out between EUI and AIA despite 48° separation
    Stated in Data and Methods; if false, the 2.6× flux ratio is partly geometric.
  • domain assumption EUI 17.4 nm and AIA 17.1 nm show statistically comparable plume populations
    Different passbands/viewing angles may select different threads; the paper relies on large-sample averaging.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High-Frequency Magnetohydrodynamic Waves with Substantial Energy in the Solar Polar Corona." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UKE4TVYL

@misc{pith2026260725799,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High-Frequency Magnetohydrodynamic Waves with Substantial Energy in the Solar Polar Corona},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UKE4TVYL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2607.25799}
}
read the original abstract

The acceleration and heating of the fast solar wind remain long-standing challenges in space physics. One type of leading theoretical models requires high-frequency magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) waves to transport and dissipate sufficient energy in the corona. However, such high-frequency waves with energetically significant amplitudes have never been unambiguously observed, leaving a key gap between theories and observations. Using high-cadence, high-resolution extreme-ultraviolet imaging from Solar Orbiter's Extreme Ultraviolet Imager, we identify a previously hidden population of high-frequency MHD waves in coronal plumes of the solar polar region. An analysis of the detected propagating kink waves shows that over one-third have periods shorter than 100 s, a population largely undetected by earlier instruments. Power spectral analysis demonstrates that these high-frequency waves carry substantial energy flux, which are significantly underestimated in lower-cadence data. These results suggest that high-frequency MHD waves may contribute importantly to the energy budget of the solar polar corona and could play a role in solar wind acceleration, highlighting the value of high-resolution observations for probing energy transport in magnetized space and astrophysical plasmas.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2607.25799 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Observations by Solar Orbiter/EUI/HRIEUV on 2021 September 14. (A) Full field of view showing the north polar coronal hole. The white box outlines the region of interest selected for detailed analysis. (B) The same region after transformation to polar coordinates. (C) Denoised image obtained using the noise-gating technique. (D) Unsharp-masked image highlighting fine plume structures. (E) Two examples of time-distan… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Observations by SDO/AIA. (A) Original AIA 17.1 nm image, with the white box marks the region of interest (ROI). (B) The ROI transformed to polar coordinates. (C) Image after denoising and unsharp masking, revealing fine plume structures. The green dotted line indicate an example of slits (with a width of 5 pixels) for TD-map generation. (D) Example TD map showing kink waves detected by NUWT. (E) Heliographic configu… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Statistical distributions of wave periods, displacement amplitudes, and velocity amplitudes measured from EUI (red) and AIA (blue) observations. Panels A, B, and C show the period, displacement amplitude, and velocity amplitude, respectively. In each panel, the left y -axis represents the number of events in each histogram bin, while the right y -axis shows the probability density (solid curves) obtained from the ke… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Frequency distribution of wave properties. Panel A shows the scatter plot between frequency and displacement amplitudes. Panel B shows the scatter plot between frequency and velocity amplitudes. Panel C shows the power spectral den￾sity (PSD) for individual wave events…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

72 extracted references

  1. [1]

    Chinese Journal of Space Science2025;45: 913–942

    Deng Y , Tian H, Jiang Jet al.Probing Solar Polar Regions. Chinese Journal of Space Science2025;45: 913–942

  2. [2]

    Zhao H, Zong Q, Wei Yet al.Influence of solar wind dy- namic pressure on geomagnetic Dst index during various magnetic storms.Science in China E: Technological Sci- ences2011;54: 1445–1454

  3. [3]

    He S, Wang H, Li Fet al.Solar-wind-magnetosphere en- ergy influences the interannual variability of the northern- hemispheric winter climate.National Science Review2020; 7: 141–148

  4. [4]

    Tarduno JA, Zhou T, Huang Wet al.Earth’s magnetic field and its relationship to the origin of life, evolution and planetary habitability.National Science Review2025; 12:nwaf082

  5. [5]

    Shang Z, Y ao Z, Liu Jet al.Statistical study of auroral vari- ability under different solar wind conditions based on clas- sification using deep learning techniques.Earth and Plan- etary Physics2025;9: 1163–1170

  6. [6]

    The effects of high-frequency Alfven waves on coronal heating and solar wind acceleration.As- tronomy and Astrophysics1997;319: L17–L20

    Marsch E and Tu CY . The effects of high-frequency Alfven waves on coronal heating and solar wind acceleration.As- tronomy and Astrophysics1997;319: L17–L20

  7. [7]

    He JS, Tu CY , Marsch Eet al.Upward propagating high- frequency Alfv ´en waves as identified from dynamic wave- like spicules observed by SOT on Hinode.Astronomy and Astrophysics2009;497: 525–535

  8. [8]

    Van Doorsselaere T, Srivastava AK, Antolin Pet al.Coro- nal Heating by MHD Waves.Space Science Reviews2020; 216:140

Show all 72 references
  1. [9]

    Banerjee D, Krishna Prasad S, Pant Vet al.Magnetohy- drodynamic Waves in Open Coronal Structures.Space Sci- ence Reviews2021;217:76

  2. [10]

    Tomczyk S, McIntosh SW, Keil SLet al.Alfv ´en Waves in the Solar Corona.Science2007;317: 1192

  3. [11]

    McIntosh SW, de Pontieu B, Carlsson Met al.Alfv ´enic waves with sufficient energy to power the quiet solar corona and fast solar wind.Nature2011;475: 477–480

  4. [12]

    First Direct Measurements of Transverse Waves in Solar Polar Plumes Using SDO/AIA.the Astrophysical Journal Letters2014; 790:L2

    Thurgood JO, Morton RJ and McLaughlin JA. First Direct Measurements of Transverse Waves in Solar Polar Plumes Using SDO/AIA.the Astrophysical Journal Letters2014; 790:L2. Page 9 of 11 Natl Sci Rev, Y ear, Vol. XX, ms

  5. [13]

    Investigating Alfv ´enic wave propagation in coronal open-field regions.Nature Communications2015;6:7813

    Morton RJ, Tomczyk S and Pinto R. Investigating Alfv ´enic wave propagation in coronal open-field regions.Nature Communications2015;6:7813

  6. [14]

    A basal contri- bution from p-modes to the Alfv ´enic wave flux in the Sun’s corona.Nature Astronomy2019;3: 223

    Morton RJ, Weberg MJ and McLaughlin JA. A basal contri- bution from p-modes to the Alfv ´enic wave flux in the Sun’s corona.Nature Astronomy2019;3: 223

  7. [15]

    Using Trans- verse Waves to Probe the Plasma Conditions at the Base of the Solar Wind.the Astrophysical Journal2020;894:79

    Weberg MJ, Morton RJ and McLaughlin JA. Using Trans- verse Waves to Probe the Plasma Conditions at the Base of the Solar Wind.the Astrophysical Journal2020;894:79

  8. [16]

    Y ang Z, Tian H, Tomczyk Set al.Mapping the magnetic field in the solar corona through magnetoseismology.Sci- ence in China E: Technological Sciences2020;63: 2357– 2368

  9. [17]

    Y ang Z, Bethge C, Tian Het al.Global maps of the mag- netic field in the solar corona.Science2020;369: 694– 697

  10. [18]

    Science2024;386: 76–82

    Y ang Z, Tian H, Tomczyk Set al.Observing the evolution of the Sun’s global coronal magnetic field over 8 months. Science2024;386: 76–82

  11. [19]

    Goossens M, Terradas J, Andries Jet al.On the nature of kink MHD waves in magnetic flux tubes.Astronomy and Astrophysics2009;503: 213–223

  12. [20]

    An Automated Algorithm for Identifying and Tracking Transverse Waves in Solar Images.the Astrophysical Journal2018;852:57

    Weberg MJ, Morton RJ and McLaughlin JA. An Automated Algorithm for Identifying and Tracking Transverse Waves in Solar Images.the Astrophysical Journal2018;852:57

  13. [21]

    Selective spatial damping of propagating kink waves due to resonant ab- sorption.Astronomy and Astrophysics2010;524:A23

    Terradas J, Goossens M and Verth G. Selective spatial damping of propagating kink waves due to resonant ab- sorption.Astronomy and Astrophysics2010;524:A23

  14. [22]

    Van Doorsselaere T, Li B, Goossens Met al.Wave Pres- sure and Energy Cascade Rate of Kink Waves Computed with Els ¨asser Variables.the Astrophysical Journal2020; 899:100

  15. [23]

    Bate W, Jess DB, Nakariakov VMet al.High-frequency Waves in Chromospheric Spicules.the Astrophysical Jour- nal2022;930:129

  16. [24]

    Kuniyoshi H, Shoda M, Morton RJet al.Can the Solar p- modes Contribute to the High-frequency Transverse Os- cillations of Spicules?the Astrophysical Journal2024; 960:118

  17. [25]

    Rochus P , Auch `ere F , Berghmans Det al.The Solar Or- biter EUI instrument: The Extreme Ultraviolet Imager.As- tronomy and Astrophysics2020;642:A8

  18. [26]

    Science overview.Astronomy and Astrophysics 2020;642:A1

    M ¨uller D, St Cyr OC, Zouganelis Iet al.The Solar Orbiter mission. Science overview.Astronomy and Astrophysics 2020;642:A1

    2020

  19. [27]

    Solar Coronal Plumes.Living Reviews in Solar Physics2015;12:7

    Poletto G. Solar Coronal Plumes.Living Reviews in Solar Physics2015;12:7

  20. [28]

    the Astrophysical Journal Letters2025;991:L45

    Baweja U, Pant V, Krishna Prasad Set al.Coexistence of Longitudinal and Transverse Oscillations in Polar Plumes Observed with Solar Orbiter/Extreme Ultraviolet Imager. the Astrophysical Journal Letters2025;991:L45

  21. [29]

    Lemen JR, Title AM, Akin DJet al.The Atmospheric Imag- ing Assembly (AIA) on the Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO).Solar Physics2012;275: 17–40

  22. [30]

    The Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO).Solar Physics2012;275: 3–15

    Pesnell WD, Thompson BJ and Chamberlin PC. The Solar Dynamics Observatory (SDO).Solar Physics2012;275: 3–15

  23. [31]

    On the Origins of Coronal Alfv ´enic Waves.the Astrophysical Journal Letters2025;986:L6

    Morton RJ and Soler R. On the Origins of Coronal Alfv ´enic Waves.the Astrophysical Journal Letters2025;986:L6

  24. [32]

    Van Doorsselaere T, Gijsen SE, Andries Jet al.Energy Propagation by Transverse Waves in Multiple Flux Tube Systems Using Filling Factors.the Astrophysical Journal 2014;795:18

    2014

  25. [33]

    Morton RJ, Gao Y , Tajfirouze Eet al.Evidence for small- scale torsional Alfv ´en waves in the solar corona.Nature Astronomy2026;10: 42–53

  26. [34]

    Lim D, Van Doorsselaere T, Berghmans Det al.Character- istics and energy flux distributions of decayless transverse oscillations depending on coronal regions.Astronomy and Astrophysics2024;689:A16

  27. [35]

    Tian H, DeLuca EE, Cranmer SRet al.Prevalence of small- scale jets from the networks of the solar transition region and chromosphere.Science2014;346:1255711

  28. [36]

    Y ang L, He J, Feng Xet al.Natural Generation of Alfv ´en Waves from Three-dimensional Bursty Interchange Mag- netic Reconnection in the Solar Corona.the Astrophysical Journal Letters2025;982:L25

  29. [37]

    Interchange Recon- nection Alfv´en Wave Generation.Solar Physics2014;289: 3043–3058

    Lynch BJ, Edmondson JK and Li Y . Interchange Recon- nection Alfv´en Wave Generation.Solar Physics2014;289: 3043–3058

  30. [38]

    Gao Y , Tian H, Van Doorsselaere Tet al.Decayless Os- cillations in Solar Coronal Bright Points.the Astrophysical Journal2022;930:55

  31. [39]

    Madjarska MS, Wiegelmann T, D ´emoulin Pet al.Coro- nal magnetic field and emission properties of small-scale bright and faint loops in the quiet Sun.Astronomy and As- trophysics2024;690:A242

  32. [40]

    Shrivastav AK, Pant V, Berghmans Det al.Statistical in- vestigation of decayless oscillations in small-scale coronal loops observed by Solar Orbiter/EUI.Astronomy and As- trophysics2024;685:A36

  33. [41]

    Jiao F , Xia L, Li Bet al.Sources of Quasi-periodic Propa- gating Disturbances above a Solar Polar Coronal Hole.the Astrophysical Journal Letters2015;809:L17

  34. [42]

    Propagating Distur- bances in the Solar Corona and Spicular Connection.the Astrophysical Journal Letters2015;815:L16

    Samanta T, Pant V and Banerjee D. Propagating Distur- bances in the Solar Corona and Spicular Connection.the Astrophysical Journal Letters2015;815:L16

  35. [43]

    the Astrophysical Journal2026;1001:173

    Qi Y , Guo M, Huang Zet al.Propagating Kink Waves in Chromospheric Jetlike Structures and Coronal Plumelets. the Astrophysical Journal2026;1001:173

  36. [44]

    Observations of counter- propagating Alfv ´enic and compressive fluctuations in the chromosphere.Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics 2014;14:299-310

    Liu ZX, He JS and Y an LM. Observations of counter- propagating Alfv ´enic and compressive fluctuations in the chromosphere.Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics 2014;14:299-310

    2014

  37. [45]

    Gener- alized phase mixing: Turbulence-like behaviour from uni- directionally propagating MHD waves.Scientific Reports 2017;7:14820

    Magyar N, Van Doorsselaere T and Goossens M. Gener- alized phase mixing: Turbulence-like behaviour from uni- directionally propagating MHD waves.Scientific Reports 2017;7:14820

    2017

  38. [46]

    Mode conversion and energy flux absorption in the structured solar atmosphere

    Skirvin SJ and Van Doorsselaere T. Mode conversion and energy flux absorption in the structured solar atmosphere. Astronomy and Astrophysics2024;683:A61

  39. [47]

    Jess DB, Snow B, Houston SJet al.A chromospheric reso- nance cavity in a sunspot mapped with seismology.Nature Astronomy2020;4: 220–227

  40. [48]

    High-frequency Spicule Oscil- lations Generated via Mode Conversion.the Astrophysical Journal2018;854:9

    Shoda M and Y okoyama T. High-frequency Spicule Oscil- lations Generated via Mode Conversion.the Astrophysical Journal2018;854:9

  41. [49]

    Tomczyk S, Card GL, Darnell Tet al.An Instrument to Measure Coronal Emission Line Polarization.Solar Physics 2008;247: 411–428

    2008

  42. [50]

    Inouye Solar Telescope (DKIST) Cryogenic Near-Infrared Spectro-Polarimeter.Solar Physics2023;298:5

    Fehlmann A, Kuhn JR, Schad TAet al.The Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope (DKIST) Cryogenic Near-Infrared Spectro-Polarimeter.Solar Physics2023;298:5

  43. [51]

    Inouye Solar Telescope - Observatory Overview.Solar Physics 2020;295:172

    Rimmele TR, Warner M, Keil SLet al.The Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope - Observatory Overview.Solar Physics 2020;295:172. Page 10 of 11 Natl Sci Rev, Y ear, Vol. XX, ms

    2020

  44. [52]

    Pant V, Magyar N, Van Doorsselaere Tet al.Investigating “Dark” Energy in the Solar Corona Using Forward Modeling of MHD Waves.the Astrophysical Journal2019;881:95

  45. [53]

    Shi M, Van Doorsselaere T, Antolin Pet al.Forward Model- ing of Simulated Transverse Oscillations in Coronal Loops and the Influence of Background Emission.the Astrophysi- cal Journal2021;922:60

  46. [54]

    Heating of the Magnetized Solar Chromosphere by Partial Ionization Effects.the As- trophysical Journal2012;747:87

    Khomenko E and Collados M. Heating of the Magnetized Solar Chromosphere by Partial Ionization Effects.the As- trophysical Journal2012;747:87

  47. [55]

    Miriyala H, Morton RJ, Khomenko Eet al.The Coro- nal Power Spectrum from MHD Mode Conversion above Sunspots.the Astrophysical Journal2025;979:236

  48. [56]

    Morton RJ, Weberg MJ, Balodhi Net al.Estimating the Poynting Flux of Alfv ´enic Waves in Polar Coronal Holes across Solar Cycle 24.the Astrophysical Journal2025; 985:13

  49. [57]

    Huang Z, Zhang Q, Xia Let al.Population of Bright Plume Threads in Solar Polar Coronal Holes.Solar Physics2021; 296:22

  50. [58]

    Tu CY , Zhou C, Marsch Eet al.Solar Wind Origin in Coronal Funnels.Science2005;308: 519–523

  51. [59]

    Moore RL, Tiwari SK, Panesar NKet al.Prospective Implications of Extreme-ultraviolet Coronal Plumes for Magnetic-network Genesis of Coronal Heating, Coronal- hole Solar Wind, and Solar-wind Magnetic Field Switch- backs.the Astrophysical Journal Letters2023;945:L16

  52. [60]

    Coronal Cells in Coronal Holes: Systematic Analysis and Implications for Coronal Evolution.the Astrophysical Journal2025;991:55

    Alzate N, Di Matteo S and Higginson A. Coronal Cells in Coronal Holes: Systematic Analysis and Implications for Coronal Evolution.the Astrophysical Journal2025;991:55

  53. [61]

    Long DM, Chitta LP , Baker Det al.Multistage Reconnec- tion Powering a Solar Coronal Jet.the Astrophysical Jour- nal2023;944:19

  54. [62]

    Guo M, Gao Y , Van Doorsselaere Tet al.Estimating the energy flux of transverse waves associated with Kelvin- Helmholtz instability in solar coronal loops.Astronomy and Astrophysics2023;676:L7

  55. [63]

    Huang Z, T ´oth G, Sachdeva Net al.Solar Wind Driven from GONG Magnetograms in the Last Solar Cycle.the Astro- physical Journal2024;965:1

  56. [64]

    Shrivastav AK, Pant V, Kumar Ret al.On the Existence of Long-period Decayless Oscillations in Short Active Region Loops.the Astrophysical Journal2025;979:6

  57. [65]

    Resonant MHD Waves in the Solar Atmosphere.Space Science Reviews 2011;158: 289–338

    Goossens M, Erd ´elyi R and Ruderman MS. Resonant MHD Waves in the Solar Atmosphere.Space Science Reviews 2011;158: 289–338

    2011

  58. [66]

    Gao Y , Van Doorsselaere T, Tian Het al.Propagating kink waves in an open coronal magnetic flux tube with gravitational stratification: Magnetohydrodynamic simula- tion and forward modelling.Astronomy and Astrophysics 2024;689:A195

    2024

  59. [67]

    Contribution of observed multi frequency spectrum of Alfv´en waves to coronal heating.As- tronomy and Astrophysics2019;623:A37

    Pagano P and De Moortel I. Contribution of observed multi frequency spectrum of Alfv´en waves to coronal heating.As- tronomy and Astrophysics2019;623:A37

  60. [68]

    Investigating Sub-Pixel 45- Second Periodic Wobble in SDO/AIA Data from January to August 2012.Solar Physics2018;293:147

    Yuan D, Liu W and Walsh R. Investigating Sub-Pixel 45- Second Periodic Wobble in SDO/AIA Data from January to August 2012.Solar Physics2018;293:147

    2012

  61. [69]

    Noise-gating to Clean Astrophysical Image Data.the Astrophysical Journal2017;838:155

    DeForest CE. Noise-gating to Clean Astrophysical Image Data.the Astrophysical Journal2017;838:155

  62. [70]

    DeForest CE, Howard RA, Velli Met al.The Highly Struc- tured Outer Solar Corona.the Astrophysical Journal2018; 862:18

  63. [71]

    Chen Y , Przybylski D, Peter Het al.Transient small-scale brightenings in the quiet solar corona: A model for camp- fires observed with Solar Orbiter.Astronomy and Astro- physics2021;656:L7

  64. [72]

    Revisiting the Relation be- tween Nonthermal Line Widths and Transverse MHD Wave Amplitudes.the Astrophysical Journal2020;899:1

    Pant V and Van Doorsselaere T. Revisiting the Relation be- tween Nonthermal Line Widths and Transverse MHD Wave Amplitudes.the Astrophysical Journal2020;899:1. Page 11 of 11 Natl Sci Rev, Y ear, Vol. XX, ms e1 e2 Azimuth (deg) a c Denoised image d Unsharp masked image X (arcse...

    2000

Pith tools

Reviewed August 1, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.