Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 45 references

This paper predicts that a rotating braneworld black hole's image — its inner shadow, lensed ring, and brightness across observing frequencies — carries measurable signatures of the higher-dimensional 'tidal charge,' with 86 GHz images brig

Reviewed by Pith at T0; open to challenge. T0 means a machine referee read the full paper against a public rubric. the ladder, T0–T4 →

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

T0 review · deepseek-v4-flash

2026-08-03 13:20 UTC pith:UKZBAK2E

load-bearing objection A competent ray-tracing study of braneworld black hole images whose headline 86 vs 230 GHz brightness ranking is baked into the ad hoc emissivity model, while the geometric inner-shadow results are probably sound. the 3 major comments →

arxiv 2607.29121 v1 pith:UKZBAK2E submitted 2026-07-31 astro-ph.HE

Optical Images of the Braneworld Black Hole Surrounded by an Optically Thin Accretion Disk

Wen-Hao Deng , Sen Guo , Qing-Quan Jiang , Kai Lin , Pei Wang This is my paper
classification astro-ph.HE PACS 04.70.-s04.50.-h
keywords braneworld black holetidal chargeblack hole imageinner shadowaccretion diskray tracingphoton ringfrequency shift
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal T4 reserved

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper sets out to show that a rotating braneworld black hole, whose only deviation from the Kerr geometry is a linear 'tidal charge' q inherited from a higher-dimensional bulk, leaves measurable fingerprints in the images produced by a thin accretion disk. The authors claim that the image asymmetry and the deformation of the inner shadow are jointly controlled by spin, tidal charge, and observer inclination, with negative q shrinking and circularising the shadow and positive q enlarging and distorting it. They further claim that, for both prograde and retrograde disks, 86 GHz images have higher peak and total intensity than the corresponding 230 GHz images, while the inner shadow and critical curve remain visible at both frequencies. A sympathetic reader would care because these are concrete, testable predictions that could distinguish a braneworld spacetime from the standard Kerr solution using horizon-scale imaging at accessible radio frequencies.

Core claim

The authors study a rotating black hole whose metric is the Kerr-like braneworld solution with a tidal charge q that modifies the spacetime linearly (unlike Q² in Kerr-Newman). Using analytic elliptic-integral geodesics plus numerical ray tracing for a geometrically thin, optically thin accretion disk that extends from the ISCO down to the event horizon (including the plunging flow), they claim that the image asymmetry and the deformation of the inner shadow are jointly controlled by spin a, tidal charge q, and observer inclination. In quantitative terms, at fixed spin the inner-shadow eccentricity changes by Δe_sh ≈ -0.02 to +0.04 as q goes from -0.3 to +0.3, with spin dominating the deform

What carries the argument

The central object is the braneworld metric, a Kerr-like spacetime in which the tidal charge q enters linearly in Δ = r² - 2Mr + a² + q, shifting the horizon, photon shell, and ISCO; q can be negative, allowing spins beyond the usual bound. The argument is carried by an analytic elliptic-integral ray-tracing formulation combined with a fisheye-camera observer frame, a radiative-transfer sum over disk crossings, and a plunging-flow prescription that extends emission from the ISCO down to the event horizon. The intensity predictions at 86 and 230 GHz follow from a two-parameter logarithmic emissivity profile with frequency-dependent coefficients, illustrating how much of the 'frequency-depende

Load-bearing premise

The claim that 86 GHz images are brighter than 230 GHz rests on the assumed disk emissivity profile (Eq. 3.13) and its two frequency-dependent fitting parameters; change those parameters and the brightness ranking can reverse.

What would settle it

A single horizon-scale observation of an accreting black hole at both 86 GHz and 230 GHz with sufficient resolution to measure total intensity: if the observed 230 GHz emission is brighter than 86 GHz in a source whose inclination is known and whose disk is plausibly thin and optically thin, the paper's central intensity claim is refuted for that system. Alternatively, an independent ray-tracing calculation using a different emissivity model that reverses the 86/230 ranking would show that the result is model-driven rather than geometric.

Watch this falsifier — get emailed when new claim-graph text bears on it.

If this is right

  • If the claims hold, future horizon-scale imaging at 86 and 230 GHz of a source with known inclination can in principle separate the effects of spin, tidal charge, and viewing angle on the inner shadow's eccentricity and the image's Doppler asymmetry.
  • A black hole observed with spin parameter exceeding the Kerr bound a > M, while still showing an inner shadow and critical curve, would be a direct sign of a negative tidal charge in this braneworld scenario.
  • The observer inclination, not the spacetime parameters, dominates the frequency-shift pattern; so inclination must be pinned down before interpreting tidal-charge signatures in redshift maps.
  • The persistence of the inner shadow and critical curve across a wide range of inclinations, spins, and tidal charges makes these geometric features the most dependable discriminators in the paper.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The '86 GHz brighter than 230 GHz' ranking is likely carried by the chosen emissivity parameters (A=0, B=-3/4 at 86 GHz versus A=-2, B=-1/2 at 230 GHz); a different but equally plausible emissivity law could reverse the ranking, so the prediction is more a statement about the disk model than about the spacetime alone.
  • One testable extension is to run the same ray tracer with the disk inner edge fixed at the ISCO, excluding the plunging flow, to isolate how much of the frequency-shift and intensity asymmetry comes from emission inside the ISCO; the paper includes that emission but does not quantify its separate contribution.
  • Because the paper leaves open whether the brane metric can be embedded as an exact higher-dimensional bulk solution, the negative-tidal-charge image templates may not survive a fully consistent braneworld construction; a proof that such a bulk embedding does not exist would invalidate the q<0 predictions.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript studies photon geodesics and synthetic images for the rotating braneworld (tidal-charge) metric of Eq. (2.1), using an elliptic-integral formulation combined with numerical ray tracing. It presents lensing bands, inner-shadow shapes, frequency-shift maps, and 230/86 GHz intensity images for an optically thin, geometrically thin equatorial disk whose emission extends from the horizon through the plunging region. The central claims are that spin, tidal charge, and observer inclination jointly control image asymmetry and inner-shadow deformation, that inclination dominates the frequency-shift distribution, and that 86 GHz images show higher peak and total intensity than 230 GHz images. Appendices A–C give detailed derivations of the radial/angular integrals, effective potential, and plunging four-velocity.

Significance. The geometric results are a useful extension of Kerr imaging to the tidal-charge family. In particular, Table 1 provides a concrete, q-dependent inner-shadow eccentricity signal (Δe_sh from about −0.019 to +0.041) that could serve as a template for future high-resolution observations if the metric is taken as the physical spacetime. The elliptic-integral treatment is carefully presented and the appendix derivations are a strength. However, the headline frequency comparison is currently not a robust prediction of the spacetime: it is largely fixed by the ad hoc emissivity parameters in Eq. (3.13). The paper also candidly states that the exact bulk embedding of the brane metric is unclear, which tempers the braneworld interpretation. With a reframing and a sensitivity analysis, the geometric parts remain valuable.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (3.13); Eqs. (3.18)–(3.19)] The claim that 86 GHz images have higher peak and total intensity than 230 GHz is not a prediction of the braneworld spacetime. With A_230=−2, B_230=−1/2 and A_86=0, B_86=−3/4, for y=ln(r/r_H)>0 one has log J_86 − log J_230 = 2y − y^2/4, which is positive for all y<8, i.e. for every relevant disk radius. Thus the 86 GHz emissivity lies above the 230 GHz one before any ray tracing, Doppler boosting, or redshift is applied, and the reported intensity ordering follows directly from the chosen A,B values. Ref. [37] is a theoretical paper, not a fit to 86/230 GHz data; no error bars or sensitivity analysis are supplied. The abstract and conclusion should either drop this frequency-ordering claim or re-derive it under a physically motivated, frequency-dependent emissivity model with a parameter survey.
  2. [Sec. 2, below Eq. (2.1)] The manuscript explicitly states that 'whether this brane metric can be embedded as an exact solution of the full higher-dimensional bulk equations is still unclear.' This caveat is load-bearing for the physical interpretation of q as a Randall–Sundrum tidal charge. The computations remain valid as a study of the effective metric (2.1), but the paper repeatedly refers to 'braneworld' predictions. Please either provide a reference/argument for the embedding or systematically soften the braneworld-specific language, especially in the title, abstract, and conclusion.
  3. [Sec. 3.3 and Table 3] The text states that 'at fixed spin, the intensity increases steadily with tidal charge in the prograde configuration,' but Table 3 is not monotonic for the prograde θ_0=150° column: I_max is 0.498447 for q=−0.3, 0.349915 for q=0, 0.402825 for q=0.1, and 0.376889 for q=0.3. The q=0.3 entry is lower than the q=0.1 entry, so the stated monotonic trend is not supported at this inclination. Please add the missing qualifier or correct the claim, and note whether these values are peak image-plane intensity or a different statistic.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Appendix A; Sec. 3.1] Cross-references are garbled in places: Appendix A refers to 'Eq. (15-17)' instead of Eqs. (2.15)–(2.17), and the text after Eq. (3.2) says 'Using Eq. (47)' rather than citing the effective-potential equation in Appendix B.
  2. [Eq. (3.12)] The weighting factor f_m is not defined as a function of image order m. If f_m=1.5 for every m, it is an overall normalization and should be stated as such; if it is intended to weight lensed/higher-order images, its value and the choice m-dependence need justification and a sensitivity check.
  3. [References] Refs. [15] and [37] are the same paper (Chael, Johnson, and Lupsasca, 'Observing the Inner Shadow of a Black Hole: A Direct View of the Event Horizon', ApJ 918, 6) and should be merged; one of the citations should be updated.
  4. [Table 1] The quantity e_sh ('effective shadow eccentricity') is used in Table 1 but not defined in the text. Please give the definition and the fitting procedure used to extract it from the numerical shadow boundary.
  5. [General presentation] Several figure axes are unlabeled or use inconsistent units (e.g. 'r/rg' vs. dimensionless M=1). Some caption texts repeat parameter definitions across nearly identical panels; a more concise presentation would improve readability.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged

The 86 GHz > 230 GHz intensity ranking is baked into the hand-set emissivity parameters A,B of Eq. (3.13), making that central frequency comparison an input consequence rather than an independent braneworld prediction.

specific steps
  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (3.13) and following parameter choices; Sec. 4 Conclusion]
    "For 230 GHz, the corresponding observing wavelength for M87∗ and Sgr A∗ is 1.3 mm. We adopt A=−2 and B=− 1/2 at this frequency. For 86 GHz, we set A= 0 and B=−3/4 [37]. ... The 86 GHz images show both higher peak intensity and larger total intensity than the corresponding 230 GHz images."

    Eq. (3.13) defines log J = A log(r/rH) + B[log(r/rH)]^2. With A=-2,B=-1/2 at 230 GHz and A=0,B=-3/4 at 86 GHz, set y=log(r/rH)>0; then log(J_86/J_230) = -0.75y^2 - (-2y -0.5y^2) = 2y - 0.25y^2, which is positive for 0<y<8, including all radii plotted in Fig. 8. Thus the 86 GHz emissivity exceeds the 230 GHz emissivity at every relevant disk radius before any ray tracing, Doppler boosting, or gravitational redshift is included. Since the transfer prescription Eq. (3.12) multiplies J_model by frequency-independent factors g and f_m, the image intensity ranking is fixed by these Ad hoc A,B choices. The paper itself calls A,B 'model-dependent fitting parameters' and cites [37] rather than a data fit or derived spectrum, with no error bars or sensitivity analysis. The 86/230 comparison is there

full rationale

The geometric results—photon lensing bands, inner-shadow morphology, Table 1 eccentricity shifts, and inclination-dominated frequency-shift distributions—are derived from the explicit metric (2.1) and geodesic/ray-tracing equations, and they do not reduce to fitted inputs; those parts are not circular. However, the paper's headline frequency comparison is circular in the 'fitted input called prediction' sense: Eq. (3.13) imposes the 86 GHz emissivity above the 230 GHz emissivity via the hand-set A,B values, and Eq. (3.12) then maps that profile into image intensities with no new frequency-dependent physics. No load-bearing self-citation was found (the emissivity parameters are cited to [37], not to the present authors). The manuscript's own caveat that the brane metric's exact bulk embedding 'is still unclear' is a robustness/correctness limitation, not a circularity step.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

3 free parameters · 5 axioms · 0 invented entities

The central predictions rest on a known spacetime metric and on a sequence of modeling choices for the accretion flow and radiative transfer. The only numbers that behave like fitted parameters are the emissivity amplitudes A,B and the higher-order image weight f_m=1.5; the 86/230 brightness comparison is determined by A,B. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Emissivity parameters A_230, B_230 = A=-2, B=-1/2
    Set in Eq. (3.13)/(3.18) as 'model-dependent fitting parameters'; controls the radial brightness at 230 GHz, strongly affecting intensity images and the 86/230 comparison.
  • Emissivity parameters A_86, B_86 = A=0, B=-3/4
    Set in Eq. (3.13)/(3.19); together with the 230 GHz profile, this choice is what makes 86 GHz images brighter.
  • Higher-order image weight f_m = 1.5
    Adopted 'throughout the analysis' without derivation in §3.2; rescales all intensities and affects quantitative intensity comparisons.
axioms (5)
  • domain assumption The rotating braneworld black hole is described by metric (2.1) with tidal charge q.
    The paper relies on the Aliev-Gumrukcuoglu Kerr-Schild-type brane metric and explicitly notes that its full bulk embedding is not established (Sec. 2). If the metric is not a valid braneworld solution, the central interpretation fails.
  • domain assumption Geodesic motion in this spacetime is separable with the same Carter-constant structure as Kerr.
    Equations (2.8)-(2.13) assume Hamilton-Jacobi separability; this property is used throughout the ray tracing but is not re-derived in the paper.
  • domain assumption The accretion disk is geometrically thin, optically thin, emits from the equatorial plane, and includes a plunging flow inside the ISCO with conserved ISCO energy and angular momentum.
    Section 3 and Appendix C adopt the Cunningham prescription; this is a standard idealization but not a consequence of the braneworld geometry, and it determines the emission region and frequency shifts.
  • ad hoc to paper The emissivity follows log J = A log(r/rH) + B[log(r/rH)]^2 with the chosen A,B values.
    The functional form and parameter values are 'model-dependent fitting parameters' adopted from [37]; the 86/230 brightness ranking is not a generic prediction of the spacetime.
  • ad hoc to paper The higher-order image weighting f_m=1.5 is adequate for the intensity integrals.
    The paper asserts f_m=1.5 without derivation or sensitivity analysis; if f_m depends on image order or spin, the quantitative intensity claims change.

pith-pipeline@v1.3.0-daily-deepseek · 27167 in / 18187 out tokens · 182944 ms · 2026-08-03T13:20:00.556555+00:00 · methodology

0 comments
read the original abstract

This work examines the observational signatures of rotating black holes with tidal charge in the Randall--Sundrum braneworld scenario. Combining an elliptic-integral-based analytical treatment with numerical ray tracing, we characterize photon motion around braneworld black holes in detail. For small observer inclinations, secondary images remain embedded inside the primary emission rings. As the inclination becomes larger, the primary and secondary images gradually separate and produce a strongly asymmetric image morphology. We show that the image asymmetry and the deformation of the inner shadow are jointly controlled by the black hole spin, the tidal charge, and the observer inclination. To analyze the frequency shifts across the accretion disk, we extend the emitting region from the ISCO down to the event horizon by including the plunging flow. The results indicate that the observer inclination is the dominant factor governing the frequency-shift distribution. In addition, we reconstruct braneworld black hole images using a fisheye-lens ray-tracing model. The optical morphology and brightness distribution show a clear dependence on the observing frequency, especially when comparing 230~GHz with 86~GHz. We also contrast the brightness distributions of prograde and retrograde disks, finding that both the total intensity and the peak intensity at 86~GHz are higher than those at 230~GHz. For negative values of the tidal charge, we further investigate the corresponding frequency-shift behavior and 230~GHz intensity profiles, which may provide useful theoretical guidance for future studies of extra-dimensional gravity models.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 32 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Zhang, S

    Z. Zhang, S. Chen and J. Jing, Images of Kerr–MOG black holes surrounded by geometrically thick magnetized equilibrium tori, JCAP.09, 027 (2024), arXiv:2404.12223 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  2. [2]

    X. Wang, Z. Zhao, X.-X. Zeng and X.-Y. Wang, Revisiting the shadow of Johannsen–Psaltis black holes, Phys. Rev. D.111, 084054 (2025), arXiv:2501.08287 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  3. [3]

    Akiyama et al., [Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration], First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    K. Akiyama et al., [Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration], First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole, Astrophys. J. Lett.875, L1 (2019), arXiv:1906.11238 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  4. [4]

    Akiyama et al., [Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration], First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    K. Akiyama et al., [Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration], First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VII. Polarization of the Ring, Astrophys. J. Lett.910, L12 (2021), arXiv:2105.01169 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    Guo, Y.-X

    S. Guo, Y.-X. Huang, E.-W. Liang, Y. Liang, Q.-Q. Jiang and K. Lin, Image of the Kerr–Newman Black Hole Surrounded by a Thin Accretion Disk, Astrophys. J.975, 237 (2024), arXiv:2411.07914 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  6. [6]

    Akiyama et al., [Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration], First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results

    K. Akiyama et al., [Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration], First Sagittarius A* Event Horizon Telescope Results. I. The Shadow of the Supermassive Black Hole in the Center of the Milky Way, Astrophys. J. Lett.930, L12 (2022), arXiv:2311.08680 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  7. [7]

    Zeng, C.-Y

    X.-X. Zeng, C.-Y. Yang and H. Yu, Optical Characteristics of the Kerr-Bertotti-Robinson Black Hole, arXiv:2508.03020 [gr-qc] (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  8. [8]

    Akiyama et al., [Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration], First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results

    K. Akiyama et al., [Event Horizon Telescope Collaboration], First M87 Event Horizon Telescope Results. VIII. Magnetic Field Structure near the Event Horizon, Astrophys. J. Lett. 910, L13 (2021), arXiv:2105.01173 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  9. [9]

    Chen and J

    S. Chen and J. Jing, Kerr black hole shadows from axion-photon coupling, JCAP.05, 023 (2024), arXiv:2310.06490 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  10. [10]

    Y. Hou, P. Liu, M. Guo, H. Yan and B. Chen, Multi-level images around Kerr–Newman black holes, Class. Quant. Grav.39, 194001 (2022), arXiv:2203.02755 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  11. [11]

    Meng, X.-M

    Y. Meng, X.-M. Kuang, X.-J. Wang, B. Wang and J.-P. Wu, Images of hairy Reissner–Nordström black hole illuminated by static accretions, Eur. Phys. J. C.84, 305 (2024), arXiv:2401.05634 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Y. Hou, Z. Zhang, H. Yan, M. Guo and B. Chen, Image of a Kerr–Melvin black hole with a thin accretion disk, Phys. Rev. D.106, 064058 (2022), arXiv:2206.13744 [gr-qc]. – 39 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  13. [13]

    S. E. Gralla, D. E. Holz and R. M. Wald, Black Hole Shadows, Photon Rings, and Lensing Rings, Phys. Rev. D.100, 024018 (2019), arXiv:1906.00873 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  14. [14]

    Zhang, H

    Z. Zhang, H. Yan, M. Guo and B. Chen, Shadows of Kerr black holes with a Gaussian-distributed plasma in the polar direction, Phys. Rev. D.107, 024027 (2023), arXiv:2206.04430 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2023

  15. [15]

    Chael, M

    A. Chael, M. D. Johnson and A. Lupsasca, Observing the Inner Shadow of a Black Hole: A Direct View of the Event Horizon, Astrophys. J.918, 6 (2021), arXiv:2106.00683 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  16. [16]

    Wang, C.-J

    K. Wang, C.-J. Feng and T. Wang, Image of Kerr–de Sitter black holes illuminated by equatorial thin accretion disks, Eur. Phys. J. C.84, 457 (2024), arXiv:2309.16944 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  17. [17]

    P. Wang, S. Guo, L.-F. Li, Z.-F. Mai, B.-F. Wu, W.-H. Deng and Q.-Q. Jiang, Optical images of the Kerr–Sen black hole and thin accretion disk, Eur. Phys. J. C.85, 747 (2025), arXiv:2507.17217 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  18. [18]

    Yang, K.-J

    C.-Y. Yang, K.-J. He, X.-X. Zeng and L.-F. Li, Observational signatures and polarized images of rotating charged black holes in Kalb–Ramond Gravity, arXiv:2508.07393 [gr-qc] (2025)

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  19. [19]

    C.-Y. Yang, M. I. Aslam, X.-X. Zeng and R. Saleem, Shadow images of Ghosh–Kumar rotating black hole illuminated by spherical light sources and thin accretion disks, JHEAp.46, 345 (2025), arXiv:2411.11807 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  20. [20]

    Y. Hou, M. Guo and B. Chen, Revisiting the shadow of braneworld black holes, Phys. Rev. D. 104, 024001 (2021), arXiv:2103.04369 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  21. [21]

    Amarilla and E

    L. Amarilla and E. F. Eiroa, Shadow of a rotating braneworld black hole, Phys. Rev. D.85, 064019 (2012), arXiv:1112.6349 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  22. [22]

    E. F. Eiroa and C. M. Sendra, Shadow cast by rotating braneworld black holes with a cosmological constant, Eur. Phys. J. C.78, 91 (2018), arXiv:1711.08380 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  23. [23]

    Abdujabbarov, B

    A. Abdujabbarov, B. Ahmedov, N. Dadhich and F. Atamurotov, Optical properties of a braneworld black hole: Gravitational lensing and retrolensing, Phys. Rev. D.96, 084017 (2017)

    2017

  24. [24]

    Banerjee, S

    I. Banerjee, S. Chakraborty and S. SenGupta, Silhouette of M87*: A New Window to Peek into the World of Hidden Dimensions, Phys. Rev. D.101, 041301 (2020), arXiv:1909.09385 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  25. [25]

    A. N. Aliev and A. E. Gumrukcuoglu, Charged rotating black holes on a 3-brane, Phys. Rev. D.71, 104027 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0502223

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  26. [26]

    A. N. Aliev and P. Talazan, Gravitational Effects of Rotating Braneworld Black Holes, Phys. Rev. D.80, 044023 (2009), arXiv:0906.1465 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  27. [27]

    Chamblin, H

    A. Chamblin, H. S. Reall, H.-a. Shinkai and T. Shiromizu, Charged brane world black holes, Phys. Rev. D.63, 064015 (2001), arXiv:hep-th/0008177

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  28. [28]

    Grenzebach, V

    A. Grenzebach, V. Perlick and C. Lämmerzahl, Photon Regions and Shadows of Kerr–Newman–NUT Black Holes with a Cosmological Constant, Phys. Rev. D.89, 124004 (2014), arXiv:1403.5234 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2014

  29. [29]

    Meng, X.-M

    Y. Meng, X.-M. Kuang and Z.-Y. Tang, Photon regions, shadow observables, and constraints from M87* of a charged rotating black hole, Phys. Rev. D.106, 064006 (2022), arXiv:2204.00897 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2022

  30. [30]

    J. M. Bardeen, Timelike and null geodesics in the Kerr metric, In Black Holes, p. 215–240 (1973)

    1973

  31. [31]

    Carter, Global structure of the Kerr family of gravitational fields, Phys

    B. Carter, Global structure of the Kerr family of gravitational fields, Phys. Rev.174, 1559 (1968)

    1968

  32. [32]

    S. E. Gralla and A. Lupsasca, Null geodesics of the Kerr exterior, Phys. Rev. D.101, 044032 (2020), arXiv:1910.12881 [gr-qc]. – 40 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  33. [33]

    S. E. Gralla and A. Lupsasca, Lensing by Kerr Black Holes, Phys. Rev. D.101, 044031 (2020), arXiv:1910.12873 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2020

  34. [34]

    Z. Hu, Z. Zhong, P.-C. Li, M. Guo and B. Chen, QED effect on a black hole shadow, Phys. Rev. D.103, 044057 (2021), arXiv:2012.07022 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2021

  35. [35]

    M. Wang, S. Chen and J. Jing, Chaotic shadow of a non-Kerr rotating compact object with quadrupole mass moment, Phys. Rev. D.98, 104040 (2018), arXiv:1801.02118 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  36. [36]

    R. W. Lindquist, Relativistic transport theory, Annals Phys.37, 487 (1966)

    1966

  37. [37]

    Chael, M

    A. Chael, M. D. Johnson and A. Lupsasca, Observing the inner shadow of a black hole: A direct view of the event horizon, Astrophys. J.918, 6 (2021)

    2021

  38. [38]

    Cárdenas-Avendaño, Alejandro and Lupsasca, Alexandru and Zhu, Hengrui, Adaptive analytical ray tracing of black hole photon rings, Phys. Rev. D.107, 043030 (2023)

    2023

  39. [39]

    M., Black hole in a uniform magnetic field, Phys

    Wald, R. M., Black hole in a uniform magnetic field, Phys. Rev. D10, 1680–1685 (1974)

    1974

  40. [40]

    Zajaček, M., Tursunov, A., Eckart, A., and Britzen, S., On the charge of the Galactic centre black hole, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc.480, 4408–4423 (2018)

    2018

  41. [41]

    J., Padilla, N

    Araya, I. J., Padilla, N. D., Rubio, M. E., Sureda, J., Magaña, J., and Osorio, L., Dark matter from primordial black holes would hold charge, JCAP02, 030 (2023)

    2023

  42. [42]

    Dadhich, N., Maartens, R., Papadopoulos, P., and Rezania, V., Black holes on the brane, Phys. Lett. B487, 1–6 (2000)

    2000

  43. [43]

    Banerjee, I., Mandal, B., and SenGupta, S., Does black hole continuum spectrum signalf(R) gravity in higher dimensions?, Phys. Rev. D101, 024013 (2020)

    2020

  44. [44]

    Neves, J. C. S., Constraining the tidal charge of brane black holes using their shadows, Eur. Phys. J. C80, 717 (2020)

    2020

  45. [45]

    F., Constraints on a tidal charge of the supermassive black hole in M87* with the EHT observations in April 2017, Universe8, 141 (2022)

    Zakharov, A. F., Constraints on a tidal charge of the supermassive black hole in M87* with the EHT observations in April 2017, Universe8, 141 (2022). – 41 –

    2017