Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 33 references

Quantum Entrepreneurship Lab: Training a Future Workforce for the Quantum Industry

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that a one-semester, project-based course pairing quantum science students with business students—structured as a simulated startup journey and embedded in a regional quantum ecosystem—can serve as a transferable model…

desk verdict A candid, well-structured course blueprint whose transferable-model claim rests on anecdotes; useful as a case study, not yet as evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2505.06298 v2 pith:UNKAWONN submitted 2025-05-07 physics.ed-ph quant-ph

Aaron Sander , Rosaria Cercola , Andrea Capogrosso , Stefan Filipp , Bernhard Jobst , Christian B. Mendl , Frank Pollmann , Christopher Trummer
show 4 more authors
Isabell Welpe Max Werninghaus Robert Wille Christian Wimmer
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.ed-phquant-ph
keywords quantumentrepreneurshipworkforceproject-basedlearninginterdisciplinaryteamsdeeptecheducationstartupsimulationtechnologyindustryuniversitycoursedesign
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The Quantum Entrepreneurship Lab is a one-semester course that the paper presents as a working template for training people who can move quantum research from the lab into industry. The course runs as a simulated startup journey: technical students work on industry-relevant research topics with academic coaches, business students first study the quantum industry separately, and then selected business students join the technical teams to judge whether each idea can become a product. The semester ends with three deliverables that mirror a real spin-out: a publication-style technical report, a white paper on commercial viability, and a startup pitch at a public event. The authors report that this format produced publishable research, internships, follow-up fellowships for nearly half the participants, and one team actively pursuing a startup. The paper's central claim is that this structure, embedded in a regional quantum ecosystem, offers a model other institutions can adopt.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the course's staged timeline, which simulates a deep tech startup journey in one semester. The machine works in four phases: a kick-off where students are matched to curated industry-relevant topics and coaches; a two-month ideation phase where technical teams develop critical thinking and distill their topic for non-experts; a one-month development phase where business students join to build business models and roadmaps; and a delivery phase producing the three final artifacts—technical report, white paper, and public pitch. Each phase forces a different skill; together they force interdisciplinary communication and an honest, early assessment of whether an academic idea can become a business.

What would settle it

Run the same course structure with lottery-based admission among equally qualified applicants and compare outcomes against a waitlist control that has equal access to the regional ecosystem; if the control group shows the same rates of publications, internships, and startup attempts, the course design is not the causal ingredient.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that a structured, one-semester course can produce both research output and entrepreneurship-ready graduates in a field as young as quantum technology. The course pairs an academic research pipeline with a commercialization track: curated topics in quantum-inspired techniques and tools for the quantum industry, application-based admission that favors motivation over grades, biweekly coaching, and a mid-course merger of technical and business students. The reported evidence is the cohort's aftermath: several technical reports grew into research publications, students found internships and industry contacts, nearly half the participants moved into quantum entrepreneurship fellowships, and one team is pursuing a startup. The authors explicitly position the Quantum Entrepreneurship Lab as a blueprint for other institutions and describe planned improvements rather than claiming controlled proof of effectiveness.

Load-bearing premise

The paper attributes its successes to the course design, but it reports no comparison group, so the same outcomes could plausibly be caused by the deliberately selected, highly motivated students or by the surrounding regional quantum network rather than by the course itself.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Other institutions with access to a quantum research ecosystem can adapt the four-phase structure to produce graduates who speak both the research and business languages of quantum technology.
  • Student teams can deliver publishable research and an honest market assessment within a single semester when topics are curated and coaches are available.
  • The public pitch event and industry networking can convert into concrete career outcomes: internships, fellowships, collaborations, and at least one startup attempt.
  • The planned hybrid topic model—a stable base of academic topics supplemented by industry-submitted topics—could make such a course sustainable across semesters without relying on external partners for every project.
  • If the model works at scale, it offers a direct pipeline from Master's-level coursework into the quantum industry workforce.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A fair test of the model would require comparing a treated cohort with a matched control group drawn from the same applicant pool; the paper's current evidence does not rule out selection effects.
  • The same structure may transfer to other deep tech fields, such as artificial intelligence or biotech, where the gap between research and market is similarly wide and interdisciplinary teams face the same communication barrier.
  • The most useful long-term evidence would track alumni over several years to see whether startups, publications, and positions persist or merely reflect the pre-selected cohort's momentum.
  • The course could also be treated as a testbed for measuring which of its components—coaching, business integration, or the pitch event—carry most of the workforce outcome.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. This paper describes the Quantum Entrepreneurship Lab (QEL), a one-semester project-based course at the Technical University of Munich that combines technical research projects in quantum science and technology with parallel business-training activities, culminating in interdisciplinary teams that produce a technical report, a business white paper, and a startup pitch at a Demo Day. The authors present the course structure, the institutional ecosystem (Munich Quantum Valley, TUM, TUM Venture Lab, PushQuantum), topic selection, participant selection, timeline, outcomes, challenges, and planned future improvements. The stated aim is to provide a blueprint for other institutions seeking to train a quantum-savvy, entrepreneurship-oriented workforce.

Significance. If the course structure is transferable, the paper could serve as a useful design reference for other universities building quantum entrepreneurship education. Its strengths are the detailed, honest description of course mechanics, the explicit acknowledgment of implementation difficulties (Section V), and the clear articulation of a two-track, interdisciplinary pedagogical model. However, the paper is a descriptive case study rather than an empirical evaluation: it offers no assessment data, no comparison group, and no pre/post measures. The central claims in the abstract that QEL 'equips students with skills' and 'provid[es] a model' are therefore not yet supported. The paper's value as a design template is real, but its claims must be substantially reframed or backed by evidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Section IV-F] The abstract's central claim that QEL 'provid[es] a model for other institutions' and 'equips students with the skills necessary' is not supported by the evidence reported in Section IV-F. That section states that 'multiple technical contributions resulting in research publications,' 'some students secured internships,' 'nearly half of the participants' continued in follow-up fellowships, and 'one team is actively pursuing a startup,' but provides no counts, definitions, baseline rates, or comparison group. Because Section III-C describes a selection process that explicitly prioritizes motivated, quantum-focused, experienced applicants, and Section II-A shows that the Munich Quantum Valley supplies topics, coaches, funding, and industry connections, the reported outcomes cannot be uniquely attributed to the course design. The paper itself concedes in Section IV that its impact is 'difficult to quantify.' Please either supply assessment data (e.g., pre/post instruments, a comparison cohort, or at least systematic counts with clear definitions) or temper the abstract and conclusions to present QEL as a course design description rather than a validated transferable model.
  2. [Section III-A; Section IV] The learning objectives listed in Section III-A (e.g., 'Introducing students to research early,' 'Introducing students to deep tech,' 'Creating a quantum workforce') are stated as expected outcomes, but the paper provides no instrument for measuring whether these objectives are achieved. There are no student evaluations, skill rubrics, reflection essays, pre/post measures, or any other form of learning-outcome assessment. Consequently, the assertion in the abstract that QEL 'equips students with the skills necessary' is an unsupported claim rather than a demonstrated result. Because the paper's stated purpose is to offer a model for other institutions, the absence of any learning assessment is load-bearing; the authors should either add such data or explicitly reclassify the contribution as a course-design report rather than an outcome-validated intervention.
  3. [Section IV-G] Section IV-G uses forward-looking and speculative language ('will (hopefully) continue,' 'should lead to internships') to describe collaborations and ventures. As written, these are projections rather than documented outcomes. Please separate reported facts (e.g., 'one team has applied for incubator support') from aspirations (e.g., 'partnerships initiated during the QEL are expected to lead to internships'), so that the outcomes section does not conflate realized impact with intended impact.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section III-A-5] There is a typo in Section III-A-5: 'entrepreneursial landscape' should be 'entrepreneurial landscape.'
  2. [Section VI-D] The subsection 'Entrepreneurs of Tomorrow' is vague and aspirational (e.g., 'quantum startup simulation labs,' 'AI-assisted venture forecasting') without concrete planned activities or timelines. Consider merging this into a forward-looking paragraph or providing more specific details, as it currently reads like a high-level vision rather than a course plan.
  3. [References] Several references are preprints or project websites without DOIs (e.g., [1], [10], [14]); providing stable identifiers or links would improve reproducibility of the course-design context for readers who wish to examine the cited ecosystem claims.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation found; the paper is a descriptive course report with no equations or fitted predictions.

full rationale

The paper is a qualitative program description of the Quantum Entrepreneurship Lab, covering course design, institutional context, outcomes, challenges, and future improvements. It contains no equations, no fitted parameters, and no quantitative model from which a target result could be derived. The central claim, that the QEL 'provides a model for other institutions seeking to cultivate a highly skilled, innovation-driven workforce,' is a design-transferability suggestion rather than a computed prediction; the paper itself states in Sec. IV that its impact 'can be difficult to quantify.' The reported outcomes—publications, internships, one startup, follow-up fellowships—are anecdotal and lack a control group or baseline, and the participant selection process described in Sec. III-C does favor motivated and experienced applicants. However, that is an evidential and selection-bias concern about the strength of the effectiveness claim, not a circularity: the course design elements are not defined in terms of the outcomes, and the paper does not rename a fitted parameter as a prediction. The references cited are external background sources for concepts such as quantum-inspired techniques, early research engagement, and deep tech; none is a self-citation that carries the load of the paper's claims, and no uniqueness theorem or prior work by the same authors is invoked to force a conclusion. Therefore there is no circular step, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No free parameters or invented entities. The course relies on standard pedagogical assumptions about the value of early research, interdisciplinary teamwork, and an external innovation ecosystem.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Early engagement in research improves student outcomes.
    Invoked in Section III-A.1 with citations [11,12] to support the course objective of introducing students to research early.
  • domain assumption Interdisciplinary collaboration in project-based settings prepares students for industry careers.
    Assumed in Sections I and III-A.4 as a core benefit of mixing technical and business roles; no empirical evidence is provided.
  • domain assumption A strong ecosystem of academic groups, incubators, and industry partners is needed to deliver the course.
    Section II describes the Munich Quantum Valley and TUM Venture Labs as pillars; the paper does not test whether the course could work without them.
  • domain assumption Students can produce meaningful research output within a one-semester course.
    Implicit in the topic selection and deliverable design (Section III-D); not empirically established beyond anecdotal examples.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Quantum Entrepreneurship Lab: Training a Future Workforce for the Quantum Industry." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UNKAWONN

@misc{pith2026250506298,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Quantum Entrepreneurship Lab: Training a Future Workforce for the Quantum Industry},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UNKAWONN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2505.06298}
}
read the original abstract

The Quantum Entrepreneurship Lab (QEL) is a one-semester, project-based course at the Technical University of Munich (TUM), designed to bridge the gap between academic research and industrial application in the quantum sector. As part of the Munich Quantum Valley (MQV) ecosystem, the course fosters interdisciplinary collaboration between technical and business students, equipping them with the skills necessary to contribute to or lead in the emerging quantum industry. The QEL curriculum integrates two complementary tracks. First, technical students form teams where they engage in cutting-edge, industry-relevant research topics under academic supervision. Meanwhile business students in a parallel course explore commercialization strategies, risks, and opportunities within the quantum technology landscape. Midway through the semester, a selection of the business students join the technical course to form interdisciplinary teams which assess the feasibility of transforming scientific concepts into viable business solutions. The course culminates in three key deliverables: a publication-style technical report, a white paper analyzing the business potential and financial requirements, and a startup pitch presented to the quantum community at a Demo Day. This work outlines the course structure, objectives, and outcomes, providing a model for other institutions seeking to cultivate a highly skilled, innovation-driven workforce in quantum science and technology.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2505.06298 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Key components and organizational structure of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Overall course timeline described in Sec. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Mock startups created from the selected topics during this iteration of the QEL [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 16 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Investing in the Quantum Future : State of Play and Way Forward for Quantum Venture Capital

    C. Jurczak. “Investing in the quantum future: State of play and way forward for quantum venture capi- tal.” arXiv:2311.17187 [physics]. (Dec. 2023), [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2311.17187

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  2. [2]

    Steady progress in approaching the quantum advantage,

    M. Bogobowicz et al., “Steady progress in approaching the quantum advantage,” McKinsey & Company, Tech. Rep., Apr. 2024, Accessed: 2025-02-21, https://www. mckinsey . com / capabilities / mckinsey - digital / our - insights/steady-progress-in-approaching-the-quantum- advantage

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    A deep inside quantum technology industry trends and future implications,

    D. S. C. Putranto et al. , “A deep inside quantum technology industry trends and future implications,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 115 776–115 801, 2024. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3444779. [Online]. Available: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10638045

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Quantum computing entrepreneurship and ieee tems,

    R. Sotelo, “Quantum computing entrepreneurship and ieee tems,” IEEE Eng. Manag. Rev. , vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 26–29, 2021. DOI: 10.1109/EMR.2021.3098260. [Online]. Available: https : / / ieeexplore . ieee . org / document/9492020

    arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    Quantum-inspired computational imaging,

    Y . Altmann et al., “Quantum-inspired computational imaging,” Science, vol. 361, no. 6403, eaat2298, Aug

    work page

  6. [6]

    Quantum-inspired framework for computational fluid dynamics,

    R. D. Peddinti et al., “Quantum-inspired framework for computational fluid dynamics,” Commun. Phys., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–7, Apr. 2024. DOI: 10.1038/s42005-024- 01623-8. [Online]. Available: https://www.nature.com/ articles/s42005-024-01623-8

    doi:10.1038/s42005-024- 2024

  7. [7]

    Quantum computing in the nisq era and beyond,

    J. Preskill, “Quantum computing in the nisq era and beyond,” Quantum, vol. 2, p. 79, Aug. 2018. DOI: 10. 22331 / q - 2018 - 08 - 06 - 79. [Online]. Available: http : //arxiv.org/abs/1801.00862

    arXiv 2018

  8. [8]

    Assessing the quantum-computing landscape,

    A. Deshpande, “Assessing the quantum-computing landscape,” Commun. ACM, vol. 65, no. 10, pp. 57–65, Oct. 2022. DOI: 10.1145/3524109. [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3524109

    doi:10.1145/3524109 2022

Show all 33 references
  1. [9]

    Acceptance and Development of Quantum Computing in the Netherlands and Ger- many: Barriers and Remedies From a Multistakeholder Perspective,

    Julian Martens et al. , “Acceptance and Development of Quantum Computing in the Netherlands and Ger- many: Barriers and Remedies From a Multistakeholder Perspective,” IEEE Transactions on Engineering Man- agement, vol. 72, pp. 62–77, 2025, ISSN : 1558-0040. DOI: 10.1109/TEM.20...

    2025

  2. [10]

    Strategiepapier: Munich quantum valley initiative,

    Munich Quantum Valley Initiative, “Strategiepapier: Munich quantum valley initiative,” Munich Quantum Valley, Tech. Rep., 2024, Accessed: 2025-02-21, https: //www.munich-quantum-valley.de/

    2024

  3. [11]

    Early engagement in course- based research increases graduation rates and comple- tion of science, engineering, and mathematics degrees,

    S. E. Rodenbusch et al., “Early engagement in course- based research increases graduation rates and comple- tion of science, engineering, and mathematics degrees,” CBE Life Sci. Educ. , vol. 15, no. 2, ar20, 2016. DOI: 10.1187/cbe.16- 03- 0117. [Online]. Available: https: //ww...

    2016 doi

  4. [12]

    Getting off to a good start? first-year undergraduate research experiences and student outcomes,

    N. A. Bowman and J. M. Holmes, “Getting off to a good start? first-year undergraduate research experiences and student outcomes,” High. Educ., vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 17– 33, Jul. 2018. DOI: 10 . 1007 / s10734 - 017 - 0191 - 4. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734- ...

    2018 doi

  5. [13]

    What is

    F. Murray, P. Budden, and J. Guimón, “What is "deep tech" and what are deep tech ventures?” MIT Regional Entrepreneurship Acceleration Program, Tech. Rep., 2023, Accessed: 2025-02-21, https : / / reap . mit . edu / assets/What_is_Deep_Tech_MIT_2023.pdf

    2023

  6. [14]

    Quantum-inspired machine learning: A survey

    L. Huynh et al. “Quantum-inspired machine learning: A survey.” arXiv:2308.11269 [cs]. (Sep. 2023), [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2308.11269

    2023 arXiv

  7. [15]

    Application of quantum-inspired generative models to small molecular datasets,

    C. Moussa et al. , “Application of quantum-inspired generative models to small molecular datasets,” in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Quantum Comput. Eng. (QCE) , Sep. 2023, pp. 342–348. DOI: 10 . 1109 / QCE57702 . 2023 . 00046. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304. 10867

    2023

  8. [16]

    Tensor networks for big data analytics and large-scale optimization problems

    A. Cichocki. “Tensor networks for big data analytics and large-scale optimization problems.” arXiv:1407.3124 [cs, math]. (Aug. 2014), [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1407.3124

    2014 arXiv

  9. [17]

    A herculean task: Classical simulation of quantum computers

    X. Xu et al. “A herculean task: Classical simulation of quantum computers.” arXiv:2302.08880 [quant-ph]. (Feb. 2023), [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/ 2302.08880

    2023 arXiv

  10. [18]

    Quantum compiling

    M. Maronese et al. “Quantum compiling.” arXiv:2112.00187 [quant-ph]. (Dec. 2021), [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2112.00187

    2021 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Scalability of quantum error mitigation techniques: From utility to advantage

    S. N. Filippov, S. Maniscalco, and G. García-Pérez. “Scalability of quantum error mitigation techniques: From utility to advantage.” arXiv:2403.13542 [quant- ph]. (Mar. 2024), [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/ abs/2403.13542

    2024 arXiv

  12. [20]

    Semiconductor defect de- tection by hybrid classical-quantum deep learning,

    Y .-F. Yang and M. Sun, “Semiconductor defect de- tection by hybrid classical-quantum deep learning,” in Proc. IEEE/CVF Conf. Comput. Vis. Pattern Recognit. (CVPR), New Orleans, LA, USA, Jun. 2022, pp. 2313–

    2022

  13. [21]

    Hybrid classical-quantum convolutional neural network for stenosis detection in x- ray coronary angiography,

    E. Ovalle-Magallanes et al., “Hybrid classical-quantum convolutional neural network for stenosis detection in x- ray coronary angiography,” Expert Syst. Appl., vol. 189, p. 116 112, Mar. 2022. DOI: 10 . 1016 / j . eswa . 2021 . 116112. [Online]. Available: https://www.scienced...

    2022

  14. [22]

    Commercial applications of quantum computing,

    F. Bova, A. Goldfarb, and R. G. Melko, “Commercial applications of quantum computing,” EPJ Quantum Technol., vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 1–13, Dec. 2021. DOI: 10 . 1140 / epjqt / s40507 - 021 - 00091 - 1. [Online]. Available: https://epjquantumtechnology.springeropen. com/articles/10.1...

    2021 doi

  15. [23]

    A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states,

    R. Orus, “A practical introduction to tensor networks: Matrix product states and projected entangled pair states,” Ann. Phys. , vol. 349, pp. 117–158, Oct. 2014. DOI: 10.1016/j.aop.2014.06.013. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1306.2164

    2014 arXiv

  16. [24]

    Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor,

    F. Arute et al., “Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor,” Nature, vol. 574, no. 7779, pp. 505–510, Oct. 2019. DOI: 10. 1038/s41586- 019- 1666- 5. [Online]. Available: https: //www.nature.com/articles/s41586-019-1666-5

    2019

  17. [25]

    Kuramoto, Quantum Many-Body Physics: A Perspec- tive on Strong Correlations (Lecture Notes in Physics)

    Y . Kuramoto, Quantum Many-Body Physics: A Perspec- tive on Strong Correlations (Lecture Notes in Physics). Tokyo: Springer Japan, 2020, vol. 934. DOI: 10.1007/ 978- 4- 431- 55393- 9. [Online]. Available: http://link. springer.com/10.1007/978-4-431-55393-9

    2020 doi

  18. [26]

    Data-driven dynamical mean-field theory: An error-correction approach to solve the quan- tum many-body problem using machine learning,

    E. Sheridan et al. , “Data-driven dynamical mean-field theory: An error-correction approach to solve the quan- tum many-body problem using machine learning,”Phys. Rev. B, vol. 104, no. 20, p. 205 120, Nov. 2021. DOI: 10.1103/ PhysRevB.104.205120. [Online]. Available: https://l...

    2021 doi

  19. [27]

    Use cases of quantum optimization for finance

    S. Mugel, E. Lizaso, and R. Orus. “Use cases of quantum optimization for finance.” arXiv:2010.01312 [q-fin]. (Oct. 2020), [Online]. Available: http://arxiv. org/abs/2010.01312

    2010 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Quantum error correction: An introductory guide,

    J. Roffe, “Quantum error correction: An introductory guide,” Contemp. Phys., vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 226–245, Jul

  21. [29]

    Quantum computations with cold trapped ions,

    J. I. Cirac and P. Zoller, “Quantum computations with cold trapped ions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. , vol. 74, no. 20, pp. 4091–4094, May 1995. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 74.4091. [Online]. Available: https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.74.4091

    1995 doi

  22. [30]

    Neutral atom quantum comput- ing hardware: Performance and end-user perspective,

    K. Wintersperger et al., “Neutral atom quantum comput- ing hardware: Performance and end-user perspective,” EPJ Quantum Technol. , vol. 10, p. 32, Dec. 2023. DOI: 10 . 1140 / epjqt / s40507 - 023 - 00190 - 1. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/2304.14360

    2023 arXiv

  23. [2018]

    [Online]

    DOI: 10.1126/science.aat2298. [Online]. Avail- able: https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science. aat2298

    doi

  24. [2019]

    [Online]

    DOI: 10.1080/00107514.2019.1667078. [Online]. Available: http://arxiv.org/abs/1907.11157

    2019

  25. [2322]

    [Online]

    DOI: 10.1109/CVPR52688.2022.00236. [Online]. Available: https : / / ieeexplore . ieee . org / document / 9879978/

    2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.