Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

3D Scanning: A Comprehensive Survey

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1801.08863 v1 pith:UPQCPVBK submitted 2018-01-24 cs.CV cs.GR

Morteza Daneshmand , Ahmed Helmi , Egils Avots , Fatemeh Noroozi , Fatih Alisinanoglu , Hasan Sait Arslan , Jelena Gorbova , Rain Eric Haamer
show 2 more authors
Cagri Ozcinar Gholamreza Anbarjafari
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.CVcs.GR
keywords scanningterrestrialaerialairbornealongchoicesclearerclose-range
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

This paper provides an overview of 3D scanning methodologies and technologies proposed in the existing scientific and industrial literature. Throughout the paper, various types of the related techniques are reviewed, which consist, mainly, of close-range, aerial, structure-from-motion and terrestrial photogrammetry, and mobile, terrestrial and airborne laser scanning, as well as time-of-flight, structured-light and phase-comparison methods, along with comparative and combinational studies, the latter being intended to help make a clearer distinction on the relevance and reliability of the possible choices. Moreover, outlier detection and surface fitting procedures are discussed concisely, which are necessary post-processing stages.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Hypo3D: Exploring Hypothetical Reasoning in 3D

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Hypo3D, a 3D VQA benchmark with 14,885 QAs over 700 indoor scenes, tests whether models can reason about imagined scene changes and shows they fall far behind humans.

Pith tools