Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 51 references

Uniqueness and Zeroth-Order Analysis of Weak Solutions to the Non-cutoff Boltzmann equation

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-02 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Large weak solutions to the non-cutoff Boltzmann equation are unique, provided the first solution keeps a pointwise Maxwellian floor.

desk verdict Conditional uniqueness for large weak solutions of non-cutoff Boltzmann, but the abstract sells a stronger theorem than the proof delivers: the load-bearing lower bound (1.10) is assumed, not derived. read the letter →

arxiv 2602.15601 v3 pith:UQ4CI62N submitted 2026-02-17 math.AP

Dingqun Deng , Shota Sakamoto This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35Q2035A0276P0576N1582C40
keywords Boltzmannequationnon-cutoffuniquenessweaksolutionslargehypoellipticityLittlewood-Paleytheorysoftpotentials
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper proves uniqueness and continuous dependence for arbitrarily large weak solutions of the spatially inhomogeneous non-cutoff Boltzmann equation with moderate soft potentials. It shows that two weak solutions with the same initial data and a finite L^r∩L^2 bound, with one solution additionally maintaining a pointwise exponential lower bound, must coincide; and the L²(t,x,v) distance between two solutions grows at most exponentially in time. The proof avoids smallness assumptions, L∞_x control, and higher Sobolev regularity, which were barriers in earlier approaches. A byproduct is L²_t,x,v stability of the data-to-solution map on L^r∩L^2 initial data.

What carries the argument

The machinery is a dilated Littlewood-Paley decomposition acting simultaneously on spatial frequency, velocity frequency, and velocity magnitude through operators ∆j, P_k, and R_r, with dilation parameters ω = ω0 2^{αj+rℓ1} and ρ = ρ0 2^{rℓ0} chosen so that one velocity derivative matches 1/(1+2s) spatial derivatives. The fractional velocity derivative (−Δ_v)^s hidden in the non-cutoff collision operator is reduced to zeroth order by dyadic summation and negative Bessel factors. The critical new estimate is a negative-order hypoelliptic L^p bound (Theorem 3.3) built on the mixed weight W(ξ,η) = exp(A ξ/|ξ|·η/ω), which recovers integrability in (t,x) for hD_v|^{-s}f. A coercive estimate for (

What would settle it

Take two weak solutions on [0,T*] with identical L^r∩L^2 initial data satisfying (1.12), and show that one violates the lower bound (1.10) on a positive-measure set while the other does not; then the stability estimate (7.72) cannot be derived by the paper's mechanism. Alternatively, construct a solution in the class (1.12) for which the dissipation lower bound c0‖f‖²_{L²_D} fails because F1 vanishes on a set of positive measure, which would directly defeat the coercive step.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim, Theorem 1.1, is that if φ1 and φ2 are weak solutions on [0,T*] satisfying the weighted bound ‖hvi^C(φ1,φ2)‖_{L∞_t L^r_{x,v}} + ‖·‖_{L∞_t L^2_{x,v}} = M0 for a sufficiently large r, and φ1 additionally satisfies the exponential lower bound Φ1 = μ + μ^{1/2}φ1 ≥ C^{-1} μ^{L0}, then the L² stability estimate ‖φ1−φ2‖_{L²_t([0,T*])L²_{x,v}} ≤ e^{CM0T*} ‖φ1,0−φ2,0‖_{L²_{x,v}} holds. Equal initial data therefore imply φ1 = φ2 a.e. The uniqueness class is only L^r∩L^2 in (x,v) with finite weighted norm; no smallness, no L∞_x, no H^m_x is required.

Load-bearing premise

The result rests on the premise that the first solution Φ1 never dips below a fixed positive multiple of the Maxwellian, almost everywhere in (t,x,v); if a solution in the L^r∩L^2 class can develop a deep near-vacuum depletion, the dissipation coercivity used to close the energy estimate would not hold.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Two weak solutions with the same L^r∩L^2-bounded initial data coincide on [0,T*] whenever one solution keeps a Maxwellian lower bound.
  • The data-to-solution map is L²_t,x,v-stable on L^r∩L^2 initial data, with the exponential constant depending only on M0, γ, s, and d.
  • The previous L∞_x barrier to uniqueness is bypassed: only L^p integrability and the small gain from hypoellipticity are used.
  • Reducing the fractional derivative structure to zeroth order makes the same strategy applicable to local kinetic equations such as Landau and Fokker-Planck, as the paper notes.
  • Because the uniqueness time depends only on M0, γ, s, d, uniqueness holds for the whole existence interval of any solution in the stated class.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The pointwise lower bound (1.10) is assumed rather than derived; if a solution fitting the weak class can develop a deep near-vacuum depletion of F1, the coercivity that closes the energy estimate would fail. The paper gestures to self-generating lower bounds but does not prove them here.
  • The §1.2.5 assertion that the Littlewood-Paley projections lie in C([0,T];H^∞_{x,v}) via 'standard approximation arguments' is not demonstrated; that time-continuity underpins the absolute continuity used in the energy identity (7.18), so a gap there would need separate repair.
  • A testable extension: check whether (1.10) follows from the L^r∩L^2 a priori bound together with the equation itself; if it does, uniqueness would hold on a purely L^r∩L^2 class with the lower bound removed.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The manuscript develops a Littlewood-Paley (phase-space dyadic) framework for the spatially inhomogeneous non-cutoff Boltzmann equation and claims, in Theorem 1.1, uniqueness and L^2_{t,x,v} stability for two weak solutions φ1,φ2 of the perturbation equation (1.6), provided the second solution satisfies the L^∞_t L^r_{x,v} ∩ L^∞_t L^2_{x,v} bound (1.12) and the first solution additionally satisfies the exponential lower bound Φ1 ≥ C^{-1} μ^{L0} in (1.10). The proof strategy is a delicate bootstrap: decompose by dilated operators ∆j P_k R_r, obtain hypoelliptic estimates (Theorem 3.3, Corollary 3.4), estimate collision commutators (Sections 4–6), and close a large-system energy estimate (7.59)–(7.72) with carefully ordered parameters. The paper is highly technical and contains a substantial amount of original machinery, but the central conclusion is conditional on assumptions that are partly asserted rather than proved, and one key closing argument is missing from the version made available to the referee.

Significance. If the full proof is correct, the result would be a major advance: uniqueness and continuous dependence for large weak solutions to the non-cutoff Boltzmann equation with only L^r ∩ L^2 regularity in (x,v), no smallness and no high Sobolev or L^∞ regularity, is well beyond current results. Positive features include: the theorem is stated with explicit hypotheses; the parameter ordering in (7.67)–(7.71) is concrete; the negative-order hypoelliptic estimates and Bony-type commutator estimates are substantial and appear carefully designed. However, the advertised claim in the abstract is stronger than the theorem: the exponential lower bound (1.10) is omitted from the abstract, and that bound is load-bearing for the coercive estimate. The closing of the a priori bootstrap (7.14) is also not available in full in the supplied text. Therefore the significance can only be assessed conditional on completion and clarification of these points.

major comments (3)
  1. [§1.2 / Theorem 1.1] The abstract states uniqueness for weak solutions with bounded L^∞_t L^r_{x,v} ∩ L^∞_t L^2_{x,v} norm, but Theorem 1.1 in §1.2 additionally assumes the exponential lower bound Φ1 ≥ C^{-1} μ^{L0} in (1.10). This assumption is not cosmetic: the coercive estimate (5.48)–(5.49) uses exactly this lower bound to obtain the dissipation c0‖f‖²_{L²_D} that drives the bootstrap, e.g. in (7.30). The paper neither derives (1.10) from (1.12) nor proves existence of solutions satisfying both; it merely attributes the lower bound to [37]. Moreover, Remark 1.2(7) states that (1.12) allows vacuum and negativity, which seems incompatible with requiring a pointwise positivity floor on Φ1. As presented, the central advertised claim is an overclaim: the theorem establishes uniqueness only within a subclass of solutions satisfying an additional, unverified positivity condition. The abstract, theorem statement
  2. [§7.2.9] The proof of Theorem 1.1 relies on the a priori assumptions (7.14), which include smallness conditions on the irregular parts ẽ_{1,δ1}, ẽ_{2,δ2} and boundedness conditions on mollified solutions. Section 7.2.9 states that these are closed ‘by exploiting the gain of integrability and regularity provided by Corollary 3.4’, but the argument supplied to the referee is truncated before completion. Without a fully displayed closing argument, the chain of estimates (7.59)–(7.72) remains conditional on (7.14). Since this is the bootstrap that justifies the energy estimate for the actual difference f = φ1−φ2, this is a load-bearing gap in the version under review. The closing step must be written out completely, or the theorem must be restated with (7.14) as an explicit hypothesis.
  3. [§1.2.5] The manuscript asserts that applying ∆jPkRr to weak solutions yields ∆jPkRrφ_i ∈ C([0,T];H^∞_{x,v}) and that t ↦ ‖∆jPkRrφ_i‖²_{L²_{x,v}} is absolutely continuous, via ‘standard approximation arguments’ in §1.2.5. This regularity and absolute continuity underpin the basic energy identity (7.18). The assertion is not demonstrated, and it is not a purely cosmetic point: the solutions have only L^r ∩ L^2 spatial regularity, so the passage from the weak form (1.8) to the differentiated energy identity requires an argument. The authors should either provide the approximation argument or specify a different way to justify (7.18) for low-regularity solutions.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Abstract / Remark 1.2] The abstract should either include the lower bound (1.10) or explicitly state that uniqueness is proved under an additional positivity assumption on Φ1. Remark 1.2(7) should also be reconciled with (1.10).
  2. [General] There are numerous typographical issues, e.g. ‘sufficiently’, ‘converegence’, ‘the therefor’, and inconsistent notation such as ‘δ’ for both mollifier scale and small parameters. A careful proofreading pass is needed.
  3. [§2.2 / §6.2] The Littlewood-Paley partition-of-unity property (2.10) is assumed only in §6.2 and Theorem 2.1, while most of the paper uses only Schwartz functions. This should be stated more prominently so that the Bony decompositions in §6.2 are not confused with the general operator calculus in §§2–5.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity; the theorem is explicitly conditional on stated hypotheses, though the abstract overstates them.

full rationale

Theorem 1.1 states its two key hypotheses directly: the exponential lower bound (1.10) and the norm bound (1.12). The proof of the L2 stability estimate (7.72) is a genuine derivation from the difference equation (7.1) via Littlewood-Paley localization, commutator estimates, the hypoelliptic estimates of Theorem 3.3/Corollary 3.4, and a Grönwall argument. No fitted parameter is later renamed as a prediction: the constant M0 is an assumed norm bound, not a value fitted to a subset of data, and the final estimate e^{CM0T} is an explicit function of that assumption. The lower bound (1.10) is load-bearing—it produces the coercive term c0∥f∥²_{L²_D} in (5.48)–(5.49) used to close (7.30)—but because it is an explicit hypothesis, its use is not circular. The main concerns are correctness/exposition, not circularity: (1.10) is motivated only by a citation ('inspired by the self-generating lower bounds in [37]') and is absent from the abstract, making the abstract's 'finite energy uniqueness' claim an overstatement; Remark 1.2(7) says (1.12) 'allows vacuum and negativity', which is at least misleading given (1.10); and §1.2.5 asserts without proof that ΔjPkRrφi ∈ C([0,T];H∞_{x,v}), an omitted regularity justification. These are unproved or conditional premises, not cases where a claimed prediction reduces by construction to its own inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are postulated. The dilated pseudo-differential operators Pk, Qk, Rr, Δj and the frequency weight Wj(ξ,η) of (3.17) are technical tools confined to the proof with no independent observable content. The genuinely load-bearing postulates are the domain assumptions (1.4)–(1.5) and the two conditional hypotheses (1.10) and (1.12); the constants listed above are chosen by hand to make the absorption argument close.

free parameters (4)
  • r = r(d,γ,s) ∈ (2,∞) = unspecified; must be 'sufficiently large'
    The L^r_{x,v} integrability exponent in hypothesis (1.12) is a free parameter of the theorem; it is chosen large enough that the negative-order hypoelliptic gain (Corollary 3.4) plus Sobolev embedding (7.73) supply the L^∞_x control needed to close the a priori assumption (7.14).
  • velocity-weight exponents ℓ0, ℓ1, ℓ = chosen large; constrained by (7.67): ℓ0=(1+2s)ℓ1+γ, sℓ1=ℓ
    These weights appear in the energy estimate (7.62) and are hand-chosen to satisfy the compatibility inequalities (7.54), (7.67), (7.68). Their existence is asserted, not forced by any external quantity.
  • dilation/damping constants ω0, ρ0, A0, C0 = chosen 'sufficiently large' subject to (7.60) and (7.69)–(7.71)
    ω0 (velocity-frequency dilation base), ρ0 (spatial dilation base), A0 (damping in the time extension (7.4)), and C0 are proof constants ordered so the right-hand side of (7.62) is absorbed into the left-hand side. They are chosen by hand to make the derivation work.
  • mollifier scales δ1,…,δ4 = chosen 'sufficiently small' (oδ(1)→0)
    The decomposition (7.13) splits solutions into regular plus small-irregular parts; smallness is fixed after ω0, A0, per constraint (7.71).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Angular non-cutoff cross-section bounds (1.4)–(1.5): b(cosθ) ≈ θ^{-1-2s}, γ∈(−d,−2s), s∈(0,1), γ+s>−d/2
    Defines the 'moderate soft potentials' regime of the theorem; the condition γ+2s<0 is used, e.g., in (7.54) to make sums over r convergent.
  • ad hoc to paper Uniform exponential lower bound (1.10) on the first solution
    Φ1 = μ+μ^{1/2}φ1 ≥ C^{-1}μ^{L0} a.e. is needed for the coercive dissipation estimate (5.48)–(5.49). The paper says it is 'inspired by' self-generating lower bounds in [37] but assumes, not proves, it. The abstract omits it.
  • domain assumption Existence of two solutions in the class (1.12) on [0,T*]
    Uniqueness is conditional: the theorem presupposes φ1, φ2 exist with bounded weighted norm M0. Cited existence theorems [36,38] are for different regularity classes (L^∞ or C^2_kin), so existence in exactly this class is not established here.
  • ad hoc to paper ΔjPkRrφi ∈ C([0,T];H^∞_{x,v}) and absolute continuity of the L² norm
    Asserted in §1.2.5 via 'standard approximation arguments' without proof; this regularity underpins the energy estimate (7.18).
  • standard math Black-box technical tools from prior literature
    Dissipation-norm equivalence (1.20) from [2,5,35]; weighted Bessel/commutator calculus from [10,22,47]; Marcinkiewicz multiplier theorem and Triebel–Lizorkin embedding (Appendix, Thms 8.1–8.2). Invoked but not re-proved.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Uniqueness and Zeroth-Order Analysis of Weak Solutions to the Non-cutoff Boltzmann equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/UQ4CI62N

@misc{pith2026260215601,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Uniqueness and Zeroth-Order Analysis of Weak Solutions to the Non-cutoff Boltzmann equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/UQ4CI62N}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2602.15601}
}
abstract

We establish the uniqueness of large solutions to the non-cutoff Boltzmann equation with moderate soft potentials. Specifically, the weak solution $F=\mu+\mu^{\frac{1}{2}}f$ is unique as long as it has finite energy, in the sense that the norm $\|f\|_{L^\infty_t L^{r}_{x,v}}+\|f\|_{L^\infty_t L^2_{x,v}}$ remains bounded for some sufficiently large $r>0$. As a byproduct, we establish $L^2_{t,x,v}$ stability for initial data $f_0\in L^r_{x,v}\cap L^2_{x,v}$. Our approach employs dilated dyadic decompositions in phase space $(v,\xi,\eta)$ to capture hypoellipticity and to reduce the fractional derivative structure $(-\Delta_v)^{s}$ of the Boltzmann collision operator to zeroth order. The difficulties posed by the large solution are overcome through the negative-order hypoelliptic estimate that gains integrability in $(t,x)$.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 24 canonical work pages

  1. [37]

    , Self-generating lower bounds and continuation for the Boltzmann equation , Calc. Var. Partial Differential Equations 59 (2020), no. 6, doi:10.1007/s00526-020-01856-9

    work page doi:10.1007/s00526-020-01856-9 2020

  2. [1]

    Radjesvarane Alexandre, Laurent Desvillettes, Cédric Villani, and Bernt Wennberg, Entropy Dissipation and Long- Range Interactions, Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 152 (2000), no. 4, 327–355, doi:10.1007/s002050000083

    work page doi:10.1007/s002050000083 2000

  3. [2]

    Radjesvarane Alexandre, Frédéric Hérau, and Wei-Xi Li, Global hypoelliptic and symbolic estimates for the linearized Boltzmann operator without angular cutoff , J. Math. Pures Appl. 126 (2019), 1–71, doi:10.1016/j.matpur.2019.04.013

    work page doi:10.1016/j.matpur.2019.04.013 2019

  4. [3]

    Radjesvarane Alexandre, Yoshinori Morimoto, Seiji Ukai, Chao-Jiang Xu, and Tong Yang, Regularizing Effect and Local Existence for the Non-Cutoff Boltzmann Equation , Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 198 (2010), no. 1, 39–123, doi:10.1007/s00205-010-0290-1

    work page doi:10.1007/s00205-010-0290-1 2010

  5. [4]

    , The Boltzmann Equation Without Angular Cutoff in the Whole Space: Qualitative Properties of Solutions , Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 202 (2011), no. 2, 599–661, doi:10.1007/s00205-011-0432-0

    work page doi:10.1007/s00205-011-0432-0 2011

  6. [5]

    , The Boltzmann equation without angular cutoff in the whole space: I, Global existence for soft potential , J. Funct. Anal. 262 (2012), no. 3, 915–1010, doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2011.10.007

    doi:10.1016/j.jfa.2011.10.007 2012

  7. [6]

    , Local existence with mild regularity for the Boltzmann equation , Kinet. Relat. Models 6 (2013), no. 4, 1011– 1041, doi:10.3934/krm.2013.6.1011

    work page doi:10.3934/krm.2013.6.1011 2013

  8. [7]

    Pure Appl

    Radjesvarane Alexandre and Cédric Villani, On the Boltzmann equation for long-range interactions , Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 55 (2002), no. 1, 30–70, doi:10.1002/cpa.10012

    work page doi:10.1002/cpa.10012 2002

Show all 51 references
  1. [8]

    Partial Differential Equations 44 (2019), no

    Ricardo Alonso, Emergence of exponentially weighted Lp-norms and Sobolev regularity for the Boltzmann equation , Comm. Partial Differential Equations 44 (2019), no. 5, 416–446, doi:10.1080/03605302.2018.1554676

    2019

  2. [9]

    Ricardo Alonso, Maria Pia Gualdani, and Weiran Sun, The M-Operator and Uniqueness of Nonlinear Kinetic Equa- tions, (2025), available at arXiv:2506.20775

    2025 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Ricardo Alonso, Yoshinori Morimoto, Weiran Sun, and Tong Yang, De Giorgi Argument for Weighted L2 ∩ L∞ Solutions to the Non-cutoff Boltzmann Equation , J. Stat. Phys. 190 (2022), no. 2, doi:10.1007/s10955-022-03053-8

    2022 doi

  4. [11]

    PDE 12 (2019), no

    Diogo Arsénio and Nader Masmoudi, Maximal gain of regularity in velocity averaging lemmas , Anal. PDE 12 (2019), no. 2, 333–388, doi:10.2140/apde.2019.12.333

    2019 doi

  5. [12]

    Jöran Bergh and Jörgen Löfström, Interpolation Spaces: An Introduction , Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1976, doi:10.1007/978-3-642-66451-9

    1976 doi

  6. [13]

    Bobylev, The theory of the nonlinear spatially uniform Boltzmann equation for Maxwell molecules , Soviet Sci

    Alexander V. Bobylev, The theory of the nonlinear spatially uniform Boltzmann equation for Maxwell molecules , Soviet Sci. Rev. Sect. C. Math. Phys. Rev. 7 (1988), 111–233

    1988

  7. [14]

    Jean-Michel Bony, Sur l’inégalité de Fefferman-Phong , Séminaire Équations aux dérivées partielles (Polytechnique) (1998-1999) (fr), talk:3

    1998

  8. [15]

    François Bouchut, Hypoelliptic regularity in kinetic equations , J. Math. Pures Appl. 81 (2002), no. 11, 1135–1159, doi:10.1016/s0021-7824(02)01264-3

    2002 doi

  9. [16]

    Tristan Buckmaster and Vlad Vicol, Nonuniqueness of weak solutions to the navier-stokes equation , Ann. Math. 189 (2019), no. 1, doi:10.4007/annals.2019.189.1.3

    2019 doi

  10. [17]

    Ke Chen, Quoc-Hung Nguyen, and Tong Yang, Well-posedness of the Boltzmann and Landau Equations in Critical Spaces, (2025), available at arXiv:2509.14845

    2025 arXiv

  11. [18]

    2, doi:10.1007/s40818-024-00177-w

    Xuwen Chen and Justin Holmer, Well/Ill-Posedness Bifurcation for the Boltzmann Equation with Constant Collision Kernel, Annals of PDE 10 (2024), no. 2, doi:10.1007/s40818-024-00177-w

    2024 doi

  12. [19]

    Alexey Cheskidov and Xiaoyutao Luo, Sharp nonuniqueness for the Navier–Stokes equations , Invent. Math. 229 (2022), no. 3, 987–1054, doi:10.1007/s00222-022-01116-x

    2022 doi

  13. [20]

    Coiculescu and Stan Palasek, Non-uniqueness of smooth solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations from critical data , Invent

    Matei P. Coiculescu and Stan Palasek, Non-uniqueness of smooth solutions of the Navier–Stokes equations from critical data , Invent. Math. (2025), doi:10.1007/s00222-025-01396-z

    2025 doi

  14. [21]

    Françoise Demengel and Gilbert Demengel, Functional Spaces for the Theory of Elliptic Partial Differential Equations , Springer London, 2012, doi:10.1007/978-1-4471-2807-6

    2012 doi

  15. [22]

    Dingqun Deng, Dissipation and Semigroup on H k n: Non-cutoff Linearized Boltzmann Operator with Soft Potential , SIAM J. Math. Anal. 52 (2020), no. 3, 3093–3113, doi:10.1137/19m1263017

    2020 doi

  16. [23]

    , The Non-cutoff Boltzmann Equation in Bounded Domains , Preprint (2023), available at arXiv:2308.00494

    2023 arXiv

  17. [24]

    Dingqun Deng and Renjun Duan, Spectral Gap Formation to Kinetic Equations with Soft Potentials in Bounded Domain, Comm. Math. Phys. 397 (2022), no. 3, 1441–1489, doi:10.1007/s00220-022-04519-2

    2022 doi

  18. [25]

    Laurent Desvillettes and Clément Mouhot, Stability and Uniqueness for the Spatially Homogeneous Boltzmann Equa- tion with Long-Range Interactions , Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 193 (2009), no. 2, 227–253, doi:10.1007/s00205-009- 0233-x

    2009 doi

  19. [26]

    Pure Appl

    Laurent Desvillettes and Cédric Villani, On the trend to global equilibrium in spatially inhomogeneous entropy- dissipating systems: The linear Fokker-Planck equation , Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 54 (2000), no. 1, 1–42, doi:10.1002/1097-0312(200101)54:1<1::aid-cpa1>3.0.co;2-q

    2000 doi

  20. [27]

    Ronald DeVore and Guergana Petrova, The averaging lemma , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 14 (2000), no. 2, 279–296, doi:10.1090/s0894-0347-00-00359-3. 83

    2000 doi

  21. [28]

    Strain, Global Mild Solutions of the Landau and Non-Cutoff Boltzmann Equations , Comm

    Renjun Duan, Shuangqian Liu, Shota Sakamoto, and Robert M. Strain, Global Mild Solutions of the Landau and Non-Cutoff Boltzmann Equations , Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 74 (2020), no. 5, 932–1020, doi:10.1002/cpa.21920

    2020 doi

  22. [29]

    Renjun Duan, Shuangqian Liu, and Jiang Xu, Global Well-Posedness in Spatially Critical Besov Space for the Boltz- mann Equation , Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. 220 (2015), no. 2, 711–745, doi:10.1007/s00205-015-0940-4

    2015 doi

  23. [30]

    Xavier Fernández-Real, Xavier Ros-Oton, and Marvin Weidner, Regularity for the Boltzmann Equation Conditional to Pressure and Moment Bounds , Comm. Math. Phys. 406 (2025), no. 8, doi:10.1007/s00220-025-05356-9

    2025 doi

  24. [31]

    Nicolas Fournier, Uniqueness of Bounded Solutions for the Homogeneous Landau Equation with a Coulomb Potential , Comm. Math. Phys. 299 (2010), no. 3, 765–782, doi:10.1007/s00220-010-1113-9

    2010 doi

  25. [32]

    Nicolas Fournier and Hélène Guérin, On the Uniqueness for the Spatially Homogeneous Boltzmann Equation with a Strong Angular Singularity , J. Stat. Phys. 131 (2008), no. 4, 749–781, doi:10.1007/s10955-008-9511-5

    2008 doi

  26. [33]

    Loukas Grafakos, Classical Fourier Analysis: Third Edition , Springer New York, 2014, doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-1194-3

    2014 doi

  27. [34]

    , Modern Fourier Analysis: Third Edition , Springer New York, 2014, doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-1230-8

    2014 doi

  28. [35]

    Gressman and Robert M

    Philip T. Gressman and Robert M. Strain, Global classical solutions of the Boltzmann equation without angular cut-off , J. Amer. Math. Soc. 24 (2011), no. 3, 771–771, doi:10.1090/s0894-0347-2011-00697-8

    2011 doi

  29. [36]

    Christopher Henderson, Stanley Snelson, and Andrei Tarfulea, Local solutions of the Landau equation with rough, slowly decaying initial data , Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Linéaire 37 (2020), no. 6, 1345–1377, doi:10.1016/j.anihpc.2020.04.004

    2020 doi

  30. [38]

    , Classical solutions of the Boltzmann equation with irregular initial data , Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (2025), doi:10.24033/asens.2603

    2025 doi

  31. [39]

    Cyril Imbert and Luis Silvestre, The weak Harnack inequality for the Boltzmann equation without cut-off , J. Eur. Math. Soc. 22 (2019), no. 2, 507–592, doi:10.4171/jems/928

    2019 doi

  32. [40]

    , Global regularity estimates for the Boltzmann equation without cut-off , J. Amer. Math. Soc. (2021), doi:10.1090/jams/986

    2021 doi

  33. [41]

    PDE 15 (2022), no

    Pierre-Emmanuel Jabin, Hsin-Yi Lin, and Eitan Tadmor, Commutator method for averaging lemmas , Anal. PDE 15 (2022), no. 6, 1561–1584, doi:10.2140/apde.2022.15.1561

    2022 doi

  34. [42]

    229, American Mathematical Society, 2023

    Giovanni Leoni, A first course in fractional Sobolev spaces , Graduate studies in mathematics, no. 229, American Mathematical Society, 2023

    2023

  35. [43]

    Nicolas Lerner, Metrics on the Phase Space and Non-Selfadjoint Pseudo-Differential Operators , Birkhäuser Basel, Switzerland, January 2010

    2010

  36. [44]

    On the Dynamical Theory of Gases , Phil

    James Clerk Maxwell, IV. On the Dynamical Theory of Gases , Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 157 (1867), 49–88, doi:10.1098/rstl.1867.0004

  37. [45]

    Differential Equations 261 (2016), no

    Yoshinori Morimoto and Shota Sakamoto, Global solutions in the critical Besov space for the non-cutoff Boltzmann equation, J. Differential Equations 261 (2016), no. 7, 4073–4134, doi:10.1016/j.jde.2016.06.017

    2016 doi

  38. [46]

    Andreas Seeger and Walter Trebels, Embeddings for spaces of Lorentz–Sobolev type , Math. Ann. 373 (2018), no. 3–4, 1017–1056, doi:10.1007/s00208-018-1730-8

    2018 doi

  39. [47]

    Stein, Harmonic Analysis (Pms-43), Volume 43: Real-Variable Methods, Orthogonality, and Oscillatory Integrals., PRINCETON UNIV PR, August 1993

    Elias M. Stein, Harmonic Analysis (Pms-43), Volume 43: Real-Variable Methods, Orthogonality, and Oscillatory Integrals., PRINCETON UNIV PR, August 1993

    1993

  40. [48]

    Theory Related Fields 46 (1978), no

    Hiroshi Tanaka, Probabilistic treatment of the Boltzmann equation of Maxwellian molecules , Probab. Theory Related Fields 46 (1978), no. 1, 67–105, doi:10.1007/bf00535689

    1978 doi

  41. [49]

    Hans Triebel, Theory of Function Spaces II , Springer Basel, 1992, doi:10.1007/978-3-0346-0419-2

    1992 doi

  42. [50]

    71–74, doi:10.1016/s1874-5792(02)80004-0

    Cédric Villani, A Review of Mathematical Topics in Collisional Kinetic Theory , Handbook of Mathematical Fluid Dynamics, Elsevier, 2002, pp. 71–74, doi:10.1016/s1874-5792(02)80004-0

    2002 doi

  43. [51]

    Yuzhe Zhu, Averaging lemmas and hypoellipticity , Kinet. Relat. Mod. 18 (2025), no. 5, 800–823, doi:10.3934/krm.2025006. Graduate School of Engineering Science, Akita University, ORCID: 0000-0001-9678-314X Email address : dingqun.deng@s.akita-u.ac.jp F aculty of Mathematics, K...

    2025 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 2, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.