Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 54 references

Level Up or Game Over: Exploring How Dark Patterns Shape Mobile Games

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Dark patterns appear in 89% of rated mobile games, even ones labeled healthy.

desk verdict The paper's headline prevalence number counts user votes, not dark patterns, which undercuts the main claim; the dataset is new and the revenue analysis is suggestive, but the interpretation needs a major rework. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.05039 v1 pith:URJOFGAK submitted 2024-12-06 cs.HC

Sam Niknejad , Thomas Mildner , Nima Zargham , Susanne Putze , Rainer Malaka This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HC
keywords darkpatternsdeceptivedesignmobilegamesvideoethicaluser-generateddatain-apppurchases
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper sets out to establish, with numbers, how common manipulative design is in mobile games. Working from 85,388 user-generated ratings covering 1,496 games on the community site darkpatterns.games, it finds that only about one game in ten has no reported dark pattern, and that games the community labels 'healthy' still contain thousands of rated instances. The paper also shows that free-to-play games, games with ads, and games with in-app purchases are significantly more likely to be rated 'dark' than paid games. If the findings hold, manipulative patterns are not an edge case in mobile gaming but a structural feature of the freemium revenue model, with real consequences for players who cannot afford to pay up front.

What carries the argument

The analysis runs on the community rating corpus behind darkpatterns.games, which lets players mark each game for the presence or absence of specific dark patterns in four categories: temporal (grinding, playing by appointment), monetary (pay-to-skip, loot boxes, pay walls), social (pyramid schemes, friend spam), and psychological (endowed progress, variable rewards). The authors extract the 1,496 games that have at least one rating, then use non-parametric tests (Kruskal-Wallis for category scores, chi-square for revenue features) to compare 'dark' versus 'healthy' games. The 'dark'/'healthy' split is the website's own threshold over the binary ratings, so the mechanism is entirely user-generated labels, not expert coding.

What would settle it

Take a random sample of, say, 50 games that the site labels 'healthy' or 'no dark patterns' and have trained coders audit the actual game interfaces for the same four categories. If the audits find dark patterns in a large majority of those games, the paper's prevalence figures and its 'healthy' group characterization would be unsupported, since the absence of a rating would not mean absence of a pattern.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that dark patterns are pervasive across mobile games, including games routinely presented as benign. Users reported 85,388 instances of temporal, monetary, social, and psychological dark patterns in the 1,496 games examined, and only 161 of those games (10.76%) had no reported instances. Games labeled 'dark' contained statistically significantly more instances of every category than games labeled 'healthy,' and the revenue analysis shows that free-to-play distribution, advertising, and in-app purchases are all strongly associated with darker ratings. The paper takes this as quantitative support for existing dark-pattern frameworks and as evidence that 'healthy' is a graded label, not a guarantee.

Load-bearing premise

The argument rests on the assumption that the community ratings on darkpatterns.games faithfully record which dark patterns are actually present in each game, even though the paper cannot verify the ratings' origin and prior work indicates users miss many dark patterns.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the reported prevalence is even roughly right, most mobile game players will repeatedly encounter dark patterns: roughly nine in ten rated games have at least one, and 'dark' games average far more.
  • Free-to-play, ad-supported, and in-app-purchase models are the settings where dark patterns concentrate, which points at the revenue model itself as the main driver rather than a few bad-apple developers.
  • Since games labeled 'healthy' also contain substantial dark patterns, app-store labels and community ratings should be treated as relative indicators, not certifications of safety.
  • The quantitative pattern supports the existing qualitative taxonomy of temporal, monetary, social, and psychological dark patterns, giving designers and regulators a measurable target.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If users systematically fail to recognize dark patterns, as the cited user studies suggest, the 89% figure is a lower bound; an expert audit of games with zero reports would likely find additional instances, especially in 'healthy' games.
  • The stronger link between revenue features (free-to-play, ads, in-app purchases) and 'dark' ratings than between any single pattern category suggests that monetization mechanics, rather than individual manipulative tricks, are the most recoverable risk signal for automated screening.
  • A testable extension would track the same corpus over time: if regulation or public pressure reduces, say, loot boxes, one would expect the mix of monetary and psychological ratings to shift rather than simply decline.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents an exploratory quantitative analysis of user-generated dark pattern ratings from the website darkpattern.games, covering 1,496 mobile games after filtering from an initial crawl of 52,111 games. The authors categorize games as 'dark' or 'healthy' using the website's labels, compare the volume of ratings across four dark pattern categories, and test associations between these labels and game pricing, advertising, and in-app purchase metadata. The central claim is that dark patterns are widespread in mobile games, including games perceived as benign, supported by a headline figure of 85,388 rated dark pattern instances and by significant chi-square associations between dark game labels and free-to-play / freemium revenue models.

Significance. If the prevalence findings were valid, the paper would provide a useful quantitative complement to prior qualitative work on dark patterns in games, and it would strengthen the case for community-based monitoring of manipulative design. The authors are transparent about several limitations, including the inability to verify the provenance of the ratings and the possibility of underreporting. The use of non-parametric tests is appropriate for the reportedly non-normal data. However, the central metric conflates individual binary user votes with distinct dark pattern instances, which undermines the headline prevalence claim and requires either re-analysis or a substantial reframing of the paper's conclusions.

major comments (4)
  1. [§3, Table 1, Appendix A] The headline '85,388 rated dark pattern instances' is not a count of distinct dark patterns. Users are asked 'in a binary way whether a dark pattern is present or not' (Section 3), so each positive response is a vote, and the same pattern can be voted for by many users. The taxonomy in Appendix A caps each category at 7 temporal, 11 monetary, 7 social, and 7 psychological pattern types, yet Table 1 reports per-game averages of 22.09 temporal patterns for dark games and standard deviations up to 97.66. Such values are mathematically impossible for counts of distinct pattern types, confirming that the aggregated numbers are sums of user votes. The abstract's '85,388 rated dark pattern instances' and the conclusion's 'over 85,000 instances' are therefore vote counts, not instance counts. The paper's RQ asks about the prevalence of dark pattern types, but the analysis never separates distinct patterns per game from rater activity. Please either re-analyze the data to count distinct patterns per game per category, or explicitly redefine all prevalence claims as 'user ratings of dark patterns' and adjust the abstract, results, and conclusion accordingly.
  2. [§4.1] The Kruskal-Wallis tests in Section 4.1 compare dark pattern ratings between the 'dark' and 'healthy' groups, but those group labels are themselves derived from the website's processing of the same user rating data. The finding that 'dark' games contain significantly more dark patterns in each category is therefore partly built into the definition of the grouping variable. The text acknowledges this in passing ('These differences ... may not be surprising as the data is structured to distinguish between games containing more or less dark patterns'), but the inferential statistics are still presented as evidence. This comparison should be either removed or reframed as a manipulation check of the website's classification, not as an independent empirical result about the prevalence of dark patterns.
  3. [§4.2] The chi-square tests of independence in the revenue analysis report only chi-square statistics, degrees of freedom, and p-values. With N = 1,496 and highly unequal group sizes (e.g., 96.8% of 'dark' games vs. 53.0% of 'healthy' games are free-to-play), p < .001 alone does not convey the magnitude of the associations. For each test, please report an effect size such as Cramér's V or an odds ratio with a 95% confidence interval, and interpret the practical significance of the magnitude in the text.
  4. [§3.1, Abstract] The data set is reduced from 52,111 listed games to 1,496 games by removing all games without any user ratings. This selection is unlikely to be neutral: games that receive ratings on a dark-pattern reporting website are probably a non-random subset, likely overrepresenting popular games or games that users suspect of manipulative designs. The abstract's claim that dark patterns are 'widespread in mobile games' should be qualified to 'widespread in the games for which users submitted at least one rating on darkpattern.games.' The discussion should explicitly address how this selection may inflate prevalence estimates and limit generalizability.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.1] There is a typo in the phrase 'damaging patters' near the beginning of Section 2.1; it should read 'damaging patterns'.
  2. [Throughout] The website name is written inconsistently as both 'darkpattern.games' and 'darkpatterns.games' (e.g., Section 1 vs. Section 3.1, and reference [11]). Please unify the spelling.
  3. [§1] The number '1.496' in Section 1 should be '1,496' for consistency with the rest of the paper.
  4. [§5.2] The text says the study 'revealed over 50k dark pattern instances' while the data reported in Table 1 and elsewhere is 85,388 ratings; please reconcile this figure.
  5. [Figure 3] The bar chart labels for 'Price to Download' are ambiguous ('Free', 'Not Free', 'Yes', 'No', 'Unknown' are mixed); please add a legend or clear axis labels for each subplot.

Circularity Check

2 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

The 'dark' vs 'healthy' group comparisons and the headline claim that dark patterns appear in benign games are built from the same user ratings that define the dark/healthy labels.

  1. self definitional [Section 3 (Methodology) and Section 4.1 (Dark Pattern Categories)]
    "Depending on overall results, the website sorts each game either into 'dark' or 'healthy' games. ... These differences between 'dark' and 'healthy' games may not be surprising as the data is structured to distinguish between games containing more or less dark patterns."

    The 'dark'/'healthy' grouping is not an independent variable: per the methodology, the website assigns these labels from the overall results of the same user dark-pattern ratings. Section 4.1 then runs Kruskal-Wallis tests comparing dark-pattern counts between the two groups. Any group formed by thresholding a variable will, almost by construction, differ on that variable, so the significant p-values do not provide empirical evidence about dark-pattern prevalence; they restate the input used to create the labels. The authors' own sentence acknowledges that the difference is an artifact of the data structure.

  2. self definitional [Abstract and Section 5.2 (Answering Our Research Question)]
    "While we have no insight into how 'dark' and 'healthy' labels were applied, we noticed that even games that are labelled as 'healthy' contained dark patterns. It seems that the website’s assignment of either label is based on a threshold that leverages the presence and absence of dark patterns with equal weights."

    The abstract's central finding — dark patterns are 'also present in games that may be perceived as benign' — is supported by counting dark-pattern ratings in games the website labels 'healthy.' But 'healthy' is not an external perception measure; it is a threshold applied to the same dark-pattern ratings. A below-threshold game will still contain positive ratings whenever the threshold is above zero, so the observation that 'healthy' games contain dark-pattern ratings is a direct consequence of the labeling rule. The conclusion that benign-perceived games contain dark patterns therefore reduces to a property of the website's scoring function rather than an independent discovery about player perception.

full rationale

This paper is a descriptive, exploratory analysis of user-generated ratings from darkpatterns.games; it fits no model and makes no prediction from fitted parameters. The main circularity is the use of the website's 'dark'/'healthy' labels, which are functions of the same dark-pattern ratings that the paper then compares. Section 4.1's Kruskal-Wallis finding that 'dark' games contain more dark patterns is forced by the labeling rule, as the authors concede, and the abstract's claim that dark patterns appear in 'benign' games likewise operationalizes 'benign' through a thresholded label. These are partial circularities in the central framing. The remaining content — the revenue-model associations (free-to-play, ads, in-app purchases) and the raw count of 85,388 positive ratings — is descriptive of the crawled data and not circular in a derivational sense. The vote-count versus distinct-instance distinction is a construct-validity limitation rather than a circularity. No load-bearing self-citation chain was found; self-citations such as [36] are corroborated by external studies and do not drive the argument independently.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no fitted statistical model, so no numeric parameters are estimated by the authors. The analysis does depend on the website's opaque label threshold and on several unverified assumptions about the user-generated data, which are listed above. No new entities (particles, mediators, forces, dimensions, or conserved quantities) are proposed.

free parameters (1)
  • dark/healthy label threshold = unknown (website applies a threshold with equal weights)
    The website sorts games into 'dark' or 'healthy' based on user ratings using an undisclosed threshold. The paper adopts these labels as the primary grouping variable in Sections 4.1 and 4.2, so the central comparisons depend on an externally chosen parameter that the authors cannot verify.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption User ratings on darkpatterns.games accurately reflect the presence or absence of dark patterns in each game.
    The prevalence estimates and all group comparisons are built on volunteer ratings. The paper notes in Section 5.1 that users often fail to recognize dark patterns, so this assumption is optimistic.
  • domain assumption The website's four-category taxonomy (temporal, monetary, social, psychological) is a valid operationalization of dark patterns in mobile games.
    The analysis inherits the website's variant list (Appendix A), which extends Zagal et al.'s three categories with a psychological category. Construct validity is not independently established.
  • domain assumption Individual ratings are independent observations.
    The paper acknowledges that account creation is easy and repeated entries could skew the data (Section 6), so the independence assumption required by chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis tests may be violated.
  • ad hoc to paper The 'dark'/'healthy' labels are not artifacts of the rating process.
    The paper admits it has no insight into how the labels are derived (Section 5.2). Because labels and ratings come from the same source, this assumption is central and unverified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Level Up or Game Over: Exploring How Dark Patterns Shape Mobile Games." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/URJOFGAK

@misc{pith2026241205039,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Level Up or Game Over: Exploring How Dark Patterns Shape Mobile Games},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/URJOFGAK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.05039}
}
read the original abstract

This study explores the prevalence of dark patterns in mobile games that exploit players through temporal, monetary, social, and psychological means. Recognizing the ethical concerns and potential harm surrounding these manipulative strategies, we analyze user-generated data of 1496 games to identify relationships between the deployment of dark patterns within "dark" and "healthy" games. Our findings reveal that dark patterns are not only widespread in games typically seen as problematic but are also present in games that may be perceived as benign. This research contributes needed quantitative support to the broader understanding of dark patterns in games. With an emphasis on ethical design, our study highlights current problems of revenue models that can be particularly harmful to vulnerable populations. To this end, we discuss the relevance of community-based approaches to surface harmful design and the necessity for collaboration among players/users and practitioners to promote healthier gaming experiences.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.05039 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. AI generated image showing a mobile device on which a fighting scene between a heroine and a monster takes place to represent the a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p001_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. This figure presents a mock-up example based on Zagal et al.’s [ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. This figure presents bar charts for the revenue analysis of a game’s price, contained advertisement, and in-app purchases between [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Jacob Aagaard, Miria Emma Clausen Knudsen, Per Bækgaard, and Kevin Doherty

    work page

  2. [2]

    ACM. 2023. Words matter: Alternatives for charged terminology in the computing profession. https://www.acm.org/diversity-inclusion/words-matter

    work page 2023

  3. [3]

    Abdullah Mohammed Baabdullah. 2020. Factors influencing adoption of mobile social network games (M-SNGs): The role of awareness. Information Systems Frontiers 22, 2 (2020), 411–427

    work page 2020

  4. [4]

    Kerstin Bongard-Blanchy, Arianna Rossi, Salvador Rivas, Sophie Doublet, Vincent Koenig, and Gabriele Lenzini. 2021. I am Definitely Manipulated, Even When I am Aware of it. It s Ridiculous! – Dark Patterns from the End-User Perspective. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2021 (2021-06-28). 763–776. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3461778.3462086 arXiv:2...

    arXiv 2021

  5. [5]

    The app market has been candy crushed

    Nicholas David Bowman, Sven Jöckel, and Leyla Dogruel. 2015. “The app market has been candy crushed”: Observed and rationalized processes for selecting smartphone games. Entertainment Computing 8 (2015), 1–9. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.entcom.2015.04.001

    work page 2015

  6. [6]

    Harry Brignull. 2010. Deceptive Design. https://www.deceptive.design/

    work page 2010

  7. [7]

    Jie Cai, Donghee Yvette Wohn, and Guo Freeman. 2019. Who Purchases and Why?: Explaining Motivations for In-game Purchasing in the Online Survival Game Fortnite. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play. ACM, Barcelona Spain, 391–396. https://doi.org/10.1145/3311350.3347196

    arXiv 2019

  8. [8]

    Weichen Joe Chang, Katie Seaborn, and Andrew A. Adams. 2024. Theorizing Deception: A Scoping Review of Theory in Research on Dark Patterns and Deceptive Design. In Extended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3613905.3650997

    arXiv 2024

Show all 54 references
  1. [10]

    Griffiths, and Małgorzata Torój

    Andrzej Cudo, Tomasz Misiuro, Mark D. Griffiths, and Małgorzata Torój. 2020. The Relationship Between Problematic Video Gaming, Problematic Facebook Use, and Self-Control Dimensions Among Female and Male Gamers. Advances in Cognitive Psychology 16, 3 (Aug. 2020), 248–267. http...

    2020 doi

  2. [11]

    DarkPattern.games. 2024. DarkPattern.games » Healthy Gaming « A void Addictive Dark Patterns. https://www.darkpattern.games Accessed: 2024-06-05

    2024

  3. [12]

    Myriam Davidovici-Nora. 2013. Innovation in business models in the video game industry: Free-To-Play or the gaming experience as a service. The Computer Games Journal 2, 3 (Dec. 2013), 22–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03392349

    2013 doi

  4. [13]

    Linda Di Geronimo, Larissa Braz, Enrico Fregnan, Fabio Palomba, and Alberto Bacchelli. 2020. UI Dark Patterns and Where to Find Them: A Study on Mobile Applications and User Perception. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu H...

    2020

  5. [14]

    Dan Fitton and Janet C. Read. 2019. Creating a Framework to Support the Critical Consideration of Dark Design Aspects in Free-to-Play Apps. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (Boise, ID, USA) (IDC ’19). Association for Co...

    2019

  6. [15]

    Kahn, Alan Borning, and Alina Huldtgren

    Batya Friedman, Peter H. Kahn, Alan Borning, and Alina Huldtgren. 2013. Value Sensitive Design and Information Systems. In Early engagement and new tech- nologies: Opening up the laboratory , Neelke Doorn, Daan Schuurbiers, Ibo van de Poel, and Michael E. Gorman (Eds.). Vol. 1...

    2013 doi

  7. [16]

    Joey Gawrysiak, Rick Burton, Seth Jenny, and Dylan Williams. 2020. Using Esports Efficiently to Enhance and Extend Brand Perceptions – A Literature Review. Physical Culture and Sport. Studies and Research 86, 1 (June 2020), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.2478/pcssr-2020-0008

    2020 doi

  8. [17]

    Asshole Designers

    Colin M. Gray, Shruthi Sai Chivukula, and Ahreum Lee. 2020. What Kind of Work Do "Asshole Designers" Create? Describing Properties of Ethical Concern on Reddit. In Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference . ACM, Eindhoven Netherlands, 61–73. https:/...

    2020

  9. [18]

    Gray, Yubo Kou, Bryan Battles, Joseph Hoggatt, and Austin L

    Colin M. Gray, Yubo Kou, Bryan Battles, Joseph Hoggatt, and Austin L. Toombs

  10. [19]

    Gray, Lorena Sanchez Chamorro, Ike Obi, and Ja-Nae Duane

    Colin M. Gray, Lorena Sanchez Chamorro, Ike Obi, and Ja-Nae Duane. 2023. Mapping the Landscape of Dark Patterns Scholarship: A Systematic Literature Review. In Designing Interactive Systems Conference . ACM, Pittsburgh PA USA, 188–193. https://doi.org/10.1145/3563703.3596635

    2023

  11. [20]

    Gray, Cristiana Santos, Nataliia Bielova, Michael Toth, and Damian Clifford

    Colin M. Gray, Cristiana Santos, Nataliia Bielova, Michael Toth, and Damian Clifford. 2021. Dark Patterns and the Legal Requirements of Consent Banners: An Interaction Criticism Perspective. , Article 172 (2021), 18 pages. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445779

    2021

  12. [21]

    Gray, Cristiana Teixeira Santos, Nataliia Bielova, and Thomas Mildner

    Colin M. Gray, Cristiana Teixeira Santos, Nataliia Bielova, and Thomas Mildner

  13. [22]

    Johanna Gunawan, Amogh Pradeep, David Choffnes, Woodrow Hartzog, and Christo Wilson. 2021. A Comparative Study of Dark Patterns Across Web and Mobile Modalities. 5 (2021), 1–29. Issue CSCW2. https://doi.org/10.1145/3479521

    2021 doi

  14. [23]

    Hilda Hadan, Sabrina Alicia Sgandurra, Leah Zhang-Kennedy, and Nacke. 2024. From Motivating to Manipulative: The Use of Deceptive Design in a Game’s Free-to-Play Transition. In Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer- Human Interaction in Play (CHI PLAY ’24) . Associat...

    2024 doi

  15. [24]

    Jebb, Scott Parrigon, and Sang Eun Woo

    Andrew T. Jebb, Scott Parrigon, and Sang Eun Woo. 2017. Exploratory data analysis as a foundation of inductive research. Human Resource Management Review 27, 2 (June 2017), 265–276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.08.003

    2017 doi

  16. [25]

    Jupyter Development Team. 2024. Jupyter Notebook Documentation . https: //jupyter-notebook.readthedocs.io/en/latest/ Accessed: 2024-06-05

    2024

  17. [26]

    Faltin Karlsen. 2019. Exploited or Engaged? Dark Game Design Patterns in Clicker Heroes, FarmVille 2, and World of Warcraft. In Transgression in Games and Play. The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11550.003.0019 arXiv:https://direct.mit.edu/book/chapter-pdf/2257587...

    2019

  18. [27]

    Aphra Kerr. 2006. The business and culture of digital games: Gamework and gameplay. Sage

    2006

  19. [28]

    King and Paul H

    Daniel L. King and Paul H. Delfabbro. 2018. Predatory monetization schemes in video games (e.g. ‘loot boxes’) and internet gaming disorder. Addiction 113, 11 (2018), 1967–1969. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.14286 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/add.14286

    2018 doi

  20. [29]

    John King, Dan Fitton, and Brendan Cassidy. 2023. Investigating Players’ Per- ceptions of Deceptive Design Practices within a 3D Gameplay Context. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 7, CHI PLAY, Article 407 (oct 2023), 17 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3611053

    2023 doi

  21. [30]

    Griffiths, and Zsolt Demetrovics

    Orsolya Király, Patrik Koncz, Mark D. Griffiths, and Zsolt Demetrovics. 2023. Gaming disorder: A summary of its characteristics and aetiology. Comprehensive Psychiatry 122 (April 2023), 152376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comppsych.2023. 152376

    2023 doi

  22. [31]

    Jamie Luguri and Lior Jacob Strahilevitz. 2021. Shining a Light on Dark Patterns. Journal of Legal Analysis 13, 1 (March 2021), 43–109. https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/ laaa006

    2021 doi

  23. [32]

    Maximilian Maier and Rikard Harr. 2020. Dark Design Patterns: An End-User Perspective. 16, 2 (2020), 170–199. https://doi.org/10.17011/ht/urn.202008245641

    2020 doi

  24. [33]

    Friedman, Elena Lucherini, Jonathan Mayer, Marshini Chetty, and Arvind Narayanan

    Arunesh Mathur, Gunes Acar, Michael J. Friedman, Elena Lucherini, Jonathan Mayer, Marshini Chetty, and Arvind Narayanan. 2019. Dark Patterns at Scale: Findings from a Crawl of 11K Shopping Websites. 3 (2019), 1–32. Issue CSCW. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359183 arXiv:1907.07032 [cs]

    2019 arXiv

  25. [34]

    Arunesh Mathur, Mihir Kshirsagar, and Jonathan Mayer. 2021. What Makes a Dark Pattern... Dark?: Design Attributes, Normative Considerations, and Mea- surement Methods. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama Japan, 2021-05-06)....

    2021

  26. [35]

    2024.Mitigating dark patterns through responsible design - ethical design considerations for user-centred technologies

    Thomas Mildner. 2024.Mitigating dark patterns through responsible design - ethical design considerations for user-centred technologies . Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Bremen. https://doi.org/10.26092/elib/3095

    2024 doi

  27. [36]

    Doyle, Benjamin R

    Thomas Mildner, Merle Freye, Gian-Luca Savino, Philip R. Doyle, Benjamin R. Cowan, and Rainer Malaka. 2023. Defending Against the Dark Arts: Recognising Dark Patterns in Social Media. InProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, Pittsburgh PA US...

    2023

  28. [37]

    Doyle, Benjamin R

    Thomas Mildner, Gian-Luca Savino, Philip R. Doyle, Benjamin R. Cowan, and Rainer Malaka. 2023. About Engaging and Governing Strategies: A Thematic Analysis of Dark Patterns in Social Networking Services. https://doi.org/10. 1145/3544548.3580695 arXiv:2303.00476 [cs]

    2023

  29. [38]

    Alberto Monge Roffarello, Kai Lukoff, and Luigi De Russis. 2023. Defining and Identifying Attention Capture Deceptive Designs in Digital Interfaces. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . ACM, Hamburg Germany, 1–19. https://doi.org/10...

    2023

  30. [39]

    K. W. Müller, M. Janikian, M. Dreier, K. Wölfling, M. E. Beutel, C. Tzavara, C. Richardson, and A. Tsitsika. 2015. Regular gaming behavior and internet gaming disorder in European adolescents: results from a cross-national representative survey of prevalence, predictors, and p...

    2015

  31. [40]

    Elena Petrovskaya and David Zendle. 2022. Predatory monetisation? A cat- egorisation of unfair, misleading and aggressive monetisation techniques in digital games from the player perspective. Journal of Business Ethics (2022), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04970-6

    2022 doi

  32. [41]

    Lingareddy, and Marshini Chetty

    Brennan Schaffner, Neha A. Lingareddy, and Marshini Chetty. 2022. Understand- ing Account Deletion and Relevant Dark Patterns on Social Media. Proceed- ings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, CSCW2 (Nov. 2022), 1–43. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555142

    2022 doi

  33. [42]

    Carla Sousa and Ana Oliveira. 2023. The Dark Side of Fun: Understanding Dark Patterns and Literacy Needs in Early Childhood Mobile Gaming. European Conference on Games Based Learning 17, 1 (Sept. 2023), 599–610. https://doi.org/ 10.34190/ecgbl.17.1.1656

    2023 doi

  34. [43]

    Statista. 2019. Number of video game users worldwide from 2019 to 2029 . https: //www.statista.com/statistics/748044/number-video-gamers-world/

    2019

  35. [44]

    Statista. 2020. Consumer spending on in-game purchases worldwide from 2020 to

    2020

  36. [45]

    Ortiz de Gortari, Daniel L

    André Syvertsen, Angelica B. Ortiz de Gortari, Daniel L. King, and Ståle Pallesen

  37. [46]

    Wai Yen Tang, Felix Reer, and Thorsten Quandt. 2020. Investigating sex- ual harassment in online video games: How personality and context fac- tors are related to toxic sexual behaviors against fellow players. Ag- gressive Behavior 46, 1 (2020), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.100...

    2020 doi

  38. [47]

    Antonius J Van Rooij, Max V Birk, S Hof, Sanne Ouburg, and S van Hilten. 2021. Behavioral design in video games: A roadmap for ethical and responsible games that contribute to long-term consumer health and well-being. Behavioral design in video games: a roadmap for ethical and...

    2021

  39. [48]

    José P Zagal, Staffan Björk, and Chris Lewis. 2013. Dark Patterns in the Design of Games

    2013

  40. [49]

    Friehs, Leandro Tonini, Dmitry Alexandrovsky, Emma Grace Ruthven, Lennart E

    Nima Zargham, Maximilian A. Friehs, Leandro Tonini, Dmitry Alexandrovsky, Emma Grace Ruthven, Lennart E. Nacke, and Rainer Malaka. 2024. Let’s Talk Games: An Expert Exploration of Speech Interaction with NPCs. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 0, 0 (2024), 1–...

    2024

  41. [50]

    Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 39, 4 (2022), 362–378

    Problem mobile gaming: The role of mobile gaming habits, context, and plat- form. Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs 39, 4 (2022), 362–378. https://doi.org/10. 1177/14550725221083189 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/14550725221083189 PMID: 36003120

    2022 doi

  42. [55]

    healthy”, and when does it transition into “dark

    David Zendle, Rachel Meyer, and Nick Ballou. 2020. The changing face of desktop video game monetisation: An exploration of exposure to loot boxes, pay to win, and cosmetic microtransactions in the most-played Steam games of 2010-2019. PLOS ONE 15, 5 (05 2020), 1–13. https://do...

    2020 doi

  43. [2018]

    In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18)

    The Dark (Patterns) Side of UX Design. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18) . Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3174108

    2018

  44. [2022]

    In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts (New Orleans LA USA, 2022-04-27)

    A Game of Dark Patterns: Designing Healthy, Highly-Engaging Mobile Games. In CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts (New Orleans LA USA, 2022-04-27). ACM, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1145/ 3491101.3519837

    2022

  45. [2024]

    In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    An Ontology of Dark Patterns Knowledge: Foundations, Definitions, and a Pathway for Shared Knowledge-Building. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . ACM, Honolulu HI USA, 1–22. https: //doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642436

  46. [2025]

    https://www.statista.com/statistics/558952/in-game-consumer-spending- worldwide/

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.