pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.10776 · v2 · pith:US3VIMSCnew · submitted 2026-06-09 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-ph

Gravitational superfluorescence from superradiant axion clouds

Zhen-Hong Lyu , Rong-Gen Cai , Jing Liu This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 12:28 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-ph
keywords superradianceaxion cloudsgravitational wavessuperfluorescenceblack holesultralight bosonscoherent emissiongravitational atoms
0
0 comments X

The pith

Superradiant axion clouds around black holes undergo self-stimulated gravitational wave avalanches.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper establishes that boson clouds formed via superradiance around spinning black holes can undergo gravitational superfluorescence. A coherent quadrupolar transition is seeded by external gravitational waves and then amplified by self-generated radiation feedback within the cloud. An effective two-level model, checked against numerical simulations, describes the resulting logistic population transfer and the delayed gravitational-wave pulse that follows with a distinct envelope. This process supplies a new observational channel for ultralight particles through their gravitational signatures.

Core claim

Boson clouds formed via superradiance around spinning black holes offer a novel probe of ultralight particles. Such gravitational atoms can undergo a self-stimulated avalanche: a coherent quadrupolar transition is seeded by external gravitational waves and amplified by self-generated radiation feedback. An effective two-level description, validated by numerical simulations, captures the logistic population transfer and the resulting delayed gravitational-wave pulse with a characteristic envelope, and assesses its detectability with future detectors.

What carries the argument

The effective two-level description of the axion cloud, which tracks coherent quadrupolar transitions and radiation feedback to produce logistic population transfer.

If this is right

  • The cloud emits a delayed gravitational-wave pulse possessing a specific envelope shape.
  • This emission is potentially detectable by future gravitational-wave observatories.
  • The mechanism supplies a transient signal for ultralight bosonic dark matter distinct from continuous superradiant emission.
  • The process constitutes a gravitational analogue of atomic superfluorescence.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Pulse timing and envelope could encode the axion mass and black-hole spin, offering a way to extract those parameters from a single event.
  • Analogous cooperative emission may occur for other bosonic fields around compact objects, broadening the set of testable ultralight candidates.
  • The transient nature of the signal could be searched for in existing or planned gravitational-wave data streams as a complement to continuous-wave searches.

Load-bearing premise

The effective two-level description accurately captures the logistic population transfer and resulting gravitational-wave pulse from the axion cloud dynamics.

What would settle it

A full numerical evolution of the axion cloud that produces population transfer without the predicted logistic form and delayed pulse envelope would falsify the two-level model.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.10776 by Jing Liu, Rong-Gen Cai, Zhen-Hong Lyu.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: FIG. 1. Numerical validation of the self-stimulated dynamics [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: FIG. 2. Resulting conditional SNR of self-stimulated GW pulses at a distance [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: FIG. 3. Numerical checks of the self-stimulated dynamics. Left: full radial simulations with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_3.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Boson clouds formed via superradiance around spinning black holes offer a novel probe of ultralight particles. We show that such gravitational atoms can undergo a self-stimulated avalanche: a coherent quadrupolar transition is seeded by external gravitational waves and amplified by self-generated radiation feedback. We formulate an effective two-level description, validated by numerical simulations, that captures the logistic population transfer and the resulting delayed gravitational-wave pulse with a characteristic envelope, and assess its detectability with future detectors. As a gravitational analogue of superfluorescence, this cooperative emission mechanism opens a new observational avenue into the ultralight dark sector.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript claims that superradiant axion clouds around Kerr black holes can undergo gravitational superfluorescence: a coherent quadrupolar transition seeded by external gravitational waves and amplified by self-generated radiation feedback. It formulates an effective two-level model, validated by numerical simulations, that produces logistic population transfer and a delayed gravitational-wave pulse with a characteristic envelope, and assesses detectability with future detectors as a gravitational analogue of superfluorescence.

Significance. If the two-level reduction and its numerical validation hold, the result identifies a cooperative emission channel in gravitational atoms that could yield distinctive, delayed GW pulses from ultralight axion clouds, providing a new observational signature beyond standard superradiant instability. The work explicitly builds on existing superradiance literature and supplies an effective model plus simulation support for the logistic transfer and pulse envelope.

major comments (1)
  1. [effective two-level model and numerical validation section] The central claim rests on the effective two-level description accurately capturing the avalanche dynamics. The manuscript must demonstrate, via the numerical simulations referenced in the abstract, that couplings to neighboring superradiant modes with distinct (l,m,ω) remain negligible across the relevant cloud densities and black-hole spins; otherwise the self-stimulated feedback loop can be altered or quenched by off-resonant interactions.
minor comments (2)
  1. Clarify the precise definition of the characteristic envelope of the delayed GW pulse and its dependence on the seeding amplitude.
  2. Add a brief statement on the range of axion masses and cloud parameters for which the two-level truncation is expected to remain valid.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for identifying this key point regarding the validity of the two-level reduction. We respond to the major comment below.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [effective two-level model and numerical validation section] The central claim rests on the effective two-level description accurately capturing the avalanche dynamics. The manuscript must demonstrate, via the numerical simulations referenced in the abstract, that couplings to neighboring superradiant modes with distinct (l,m,ω) remain negligible across the relevant cloud densities and black-hole spins; otherwise the self-stimulated feedback loop can be altered or quenched by off-resonant interactions.

    Authors: We agree that an explicit demonstration of negligible couplings to neighboring modes is necessary to fully substantiate the two-level model. Our existing numerical simulations solve the coupled axion-gravitational wave system and already exhibit logistic population transfer and pulse envelopes that match the two-level predictions to high accuracy; this agreement would be disrupted by significant off-resonant driving. To address the referee's request directly, we will add a dedicated paragraph (with supporting figures) in the numerical validation section that quantifies the detuning and excitation amplitudes for the nearest neighboring (l,m,ω) modes over the relevant ranges of cloud density and black-hole spin, confirming that their contributions remain below the percent level and do not quench the avalanche. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Derivation self-contained; no circular reductions identified

full rationale

The paper formulates an effective two-level system for the avalanche process, states that it is validated by numerical simulations, and presents the logistic transfer and GW pulse as outputs of that model. No quoted equations or self-citations reduce the claimed pulse or avalanche to a fitted parameter by construction, nor does any load-bearing step rely on a self-citation chain whose validity depends on the present result. The mechanism is framed as an application of existing superradiance concepts to a new cooperative emission channel, keeping the derivation independent of its own outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is inferred from the described mechanism; the central claim rests on the formation of boson clouds via superradiance and the validity of the two-level reduction.

axioms (2)
  • domain assumption Boson clouds form via superradiance around spinning black holes and can be treated as gravitational atoms
    Invoked in the opening sentence of the abstract as the starting point for the avalanche process.
  • domain assumption An effective two-level description captures the dynamics of the coherent quadrupolar transition
    Stated as the modeling choice that is validated by simulations.
invented entities (1)
  • self-stimulated avalanche in gravitational atoms no independent evidence
    purpose: To produce the cooperative emission and delayed gravitational-wave pulse
    New cooperative mechanism introduced to explain the feedback-amplified transition; no independent evidence provided beyond the abstract's mention of simulations.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5627 in / 1483 out tokens · 22447 ms · 2026-06-27T12:28:09.529136+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

80 extracted references · 2 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Consequently, the same coherence that drives the avalanche also shapes the es- caping signal: a quasi-monochromatic GW pulse with a full width at half-maximum ∆t FWHM = 4 arcosh(2)t p ≃ 5.27t p and a bandwidth ∆f∼(2πt p)−1. For the B (|322⟩ → |320⟩) and C (|433⟩ → |431⟩) channels, the characteristic amplitudeh 0 is evaluated under the assumption that the ...

    2021

  2. [2]

    A new light boson?,

    S. Weinberg, “A new light boson?,”Phys. Rev. Lett.40 (Jan, 1978) 223–226.https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.40.223

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.40.223 1978

  3. [3]

    String Axiverse,

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper, and J. March-Russell, “String Axiverse,”Phys. Rev. D 81(2010) 123530,arXiv:0905.4720 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  4. [4]

    Axion Cosmology,

    D. J. E. Marsh, “Axion Cosmology,”Phys. Rept.643 (2016) 1–79,arXiv:1510.07633 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  5. [5]

    Ultralight scalars as cosmological dark matter,

    L. Hui, J. P. Ostriker, S. Tremaine, and E. Witten, “Ultralight scalars as cosmological dark matter,”Phys. Rev. D95no. 4, (2017) 043541,arXiv:1610.08297 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  6. [6]

    Ultra-light dark matter,

    E. G. M. Ferreira, “Ultra-light dark matter,”Astron. Astrophys. Rev.29no. 1, (2021) 7,arXiv:2005.03254 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2021

  7. [7]

    Generation of Waves by a Rotating Body,

    Y. B. Zeldovich, “Generation of Waves by a Rotating Body,”Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics Letters14(1971) 180

    1971

  8. [8]

    Amplification of waves during reflection from a rotating

    A. A. Starobinskii, “Amplification of waves during reflection from a rotating ”black hole”,”Sov. Phys. JETP37no. 1, (1973) 28–32

    1973

  9. [9]

    Floating Orbits, Superradiant Scattering and the Black-hole Bomb,

    W. H. Press and S. A. Teukolsky, “Floating Orbits, Superradiant Scattering and the Black-hole Bomb,” Nature238(1972) 211–212

    1972

  10. [10]

    Superradiance: New Frontiers in Black Hole Physics,

    R. Brito, V. Cardoso, and P. Pani, “Superradiance: New Frontiers in Black Hole Physics,”Lect. Notes Phys. 906(2015) pp.1–237,arXiv:1501.06570 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  11. [11]

    Exploring the String Axiverse with Precision Black Hole Physics,

    A. Arvanitaki and S. Dubovsky, “Exploring the String Axiverse with Precision Black Hole Physics,”Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 044026,arXiv:1004.3558 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  12. [12]

    Discovering the QCD Axion with Black Holes and Gravitational Waves,

    A. Arvanitaki, M. Baryakhtar, and X. Huang, “Discovering the QCD Axion with Black Holes and Gravitational Waves,”Phys. Rev. D91no. 8, (2015) 084011,arXiv:1411.2263 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  13. [13]

    The Spectra of Gravitational Atoms,

    D. Baumann, H. S. Chia, J. Stout, and L. ter Haar, “The Spectra of Gravitational Atoms,”JCAP12(Dec.,

  14. [14]

    006,arXiv:1908.10370 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 1908

  15. [15]

    Stochastic and resolvable gravitational waves from ultralight bosons,

    R. Brito, S. Ghosh, E. Barausse, E. Berti, V. Cardoso, I. Dvorkin, A. Klein, and P. Pani, “Stochastic and resolvable gravitational waves from ultralight bosons,” Phys. Rev. Lett.119no. 13, (2017) 131101, arXiv:1706.05097 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  16. [16]

    Follow-up signals from superradiant instabilities of black hole merger remnants,

    S. Ghosh, E. Berti, R. Brito, and M. Richartz, “Follow-up signals from superradiant instabilities of black hole merger remnants,”Phys. Rev. D99no. 10, (May, 2019) 104030,arXiv:1812.01620 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  17. [17]

    All-sky search for gravitational wave emission from scalar boson clouds around spinning black holes in LIGO O3 data,

    LIGO Scientific, Virgo, KAGRA Collaboration, R. Abbottet al., “All-sky search for gravitational wave emission from scalar boson clouds around spinning black holes in LIGO O3 data,”Phys. Rev. D105no. 10, (2022) 102001,arXiv:2111.15507 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2022

  18. [18]

    Constraints on an ultralight scalar boson from Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo’s first three observing runs using the stochastic gravitational-wave background,

    C. Yuan, Y. Jiang, and Q.-G. Huang, “Constraints on an ultralight scalar boson from Advanced LIGO and Advanced Virgo’s first three observing runs using the stochastic gravitational-wave background,”Phys. Rev. D106no. 2, (2022) 023020,arXiv:2204.03482 6 [astro-ph.CO]

    arXiv 2022

  19. [19]

    Subdominant modes of the scalar superradiant instability and gravitational wave beats,

    Y.-d. Guo, S.-s. Bao, and H. Zhang, “Subdominant modes of the scalar superradiant instability and gravitational wave beats,”Phys. Rev. D107no. 7, (2023) 075009,arXiv:2212.07186 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

  20. [20]

    Gravitational laser: the stimulated radiation of gravitational waves from the clouds of ultralight bosons,

    J. Liu, “Gravitational laser: the stimulated radiation of gravitational waves from the clouds of ultralight bosons,”Commun. Theor. Phys.78no. 3, (2026) 035403,arXiv:2401.16096 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2026

  21. [21]

    The Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background from Primordial Gravitational Atoms,

    Z. Kang, T. Li, and W. Ye, “The Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background from Primordial Gravitational Atoms,”JCAP11(Nov., 2024) 039, arXiv:2407.13385 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  22. [22]

    Ultralight Boson Ionization from Comparable-Mass Binary Black Holes,

    Y. Guo, Z. Zhong, Y. Chen, V. Cardoso, T. Ikeda, and L. Zhou, “Ultralight Boson Ionization from Comparable-Mass Binary Black Holes,” arXiv:2509.09643 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  23. [23]

    Stimulated Axion Decay in Superradiant Clouds around Primordial Black Holes,

    J. G. Rosa and T. W. Kephart, “Stimulated Axion Decay in Superradiant Clouds around Primordial Black Holes,”Phys. Rev. Lett.120no. 23, (2018) 231102, arXiv:1709.06581 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  24. [24]

    Blasts of light from axions,

    T. Ikeda, R. Brito, and V. Cardoso, “Blasts of light from axions,”Phys. Rev. Lett.122no. 8, (Mar., 2019) 081101,1811.04950 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  25. [25]

    Superradiance: Axionic Couplings and Plasma Effects,

    T. F. M. Spieksma, E. Cannizzaro, T. Ikeda, V. Cardoso, and Y. Chen, “Superradiance: Axionic Couplings and Plasma Effects,”Phys. Rev. D108no. 6, (Sept., 2023) 063013,arXiv:2306.16447 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Probing Axions with Event Horizon Telescope Polarimetric Measurements,

    Y. Chen, J. Shu, X. Xue, Q. Yuan, and Y. Zhao, “Probing Axions with Event Horizon Telescope Polarimetric Measurements,”Phys. Rev. Lett.124 no. 6, (2020) 061102,arXiv:1905.02213 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  27. [27]

    Stringent axion constraints with Event Horizon Telescope polarimetric measurements of M87 ∗,

    Y. Chen, Y. Liu, R.-S. Lu, Y. Mizuno, J. Shu, X. Xue, Q. Yuan, and Y. Zhao, “Stringent axion constraints with Event Horizon Telescope polarimetric measurements of M87 ∗,”Nature Astron.6no. 5, (2022) 592–598,arXiv:2105.04572 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2022

  28. [28]

    Photon Ring Astrometry for Superradiant Clouds,

    Y. Chen, X. Xue, R. Brito, and V. Cardoso, “Photon Ring Astrometry for Superradiant Clouds,”Phys. Rev. Lett.130no. 11, (2023) 111401,arXiv:2211.03794 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

  29. [29]

    Black hole spin constraints on the mass spectrum and number of axionlike fields,

    M. J. Stott and D. J. E. Marsh, “Black hole spin constraints on the mass spectrum and number of axionlike fields,”Phys. Rev. D98no. 8, (Oct., 2018) 083006,arXiv:1805.02016 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  30. [30]

    Superradiance and the Spins of Black Holes from LIGO and X-ray binaries,

    N. Fernandez, A. Ghalsasi, and S. Profumo, “Superradiance and the Spins of Black Holes from LIGO and X-ray binaries,”arXiv:1911.07862 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 1911

  31. [31]

    Ultralight Boson Dark Matter and Event Horizon Telescope Observations of M87*,

    H. Davoudiasl and P. B. Denton, “Ultralight Boson Dark Matter and Event Horizon Telescope Observations of M87*,”Phys. Rev. Lett.123no. 2, (2019) 021102, arXiv:1904.09242 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  32. [32]

    Constraints on Ultralight Scalar Bosons within Black Hole Spin Measurements from the LIGO-Virgo GWTC-2,

    K. K. Y. Ng, S. Vitale, O. A. Hannuksela, and T. G. F. Li, “Constraints on Ultralight Scalar Bosons within Black Hole Spin Measurements from the LIGO-Virgo GWTC-2,”Phys. Rev. Lett.126no. 15, (2021) 151102, arXiv:2011.06010 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2021

  33. [33]

    The BH-PSR Gravitational Molecule,

    T. Liu and K.-F. Lyu, “The BH-PSR Gravitational Molecule,”arXiv:2107.09971 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv

  34. [34]

    Bounds on ultralight bosons from the Event Horizon Telescope observation of Sgr A∗,

    A. K. Saha, P. Parashari, T. N. Maity, A. Dubey, S. Bouri, and R. Laha, “Bounds on ultralight bosons from the Event Horizon Telescope observation of Sgr A∗,”Eur. Phys. J. C84no. 9, (2024) 901, arXiv:2208.03530 [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Constraints on an axionlike particle from black hole spin superradiance,

    L.-d. Cheng, H. Zhang, and S.-s. Bao, “Constraints on an axionlike particle from black hole spin superradiance,”Phys. Rev. D107no. 6, (2023) 063021, arXiv:2201.11338 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

  36. [36]

    Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals in Ultralight Dark Matter,

    F. Duque, C. F. B. Macedo, R. Vicente, and V. Cardoso, “Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals in Ultralight Dark Matter,”Phys. Rev. Lett.133no. 12, (2024) 121404,arXiv:2312.06767 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Stepping up superradiance constraints on axions,

    S. J. Witte and A. Mummery, “Stepping up superradiance constraints on axions,”Phys. Rev. D111 no. 8, (2025) 083044,arXiv:2412.03655 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Getting more out of black hole superradiance: a statistically rigorous approach to ultralight boson constraints from black hole spin measurements,

    S. Hoof, D. J. E. Marsh, J. Sisk-Reyn´ es, J. H. Matthews, and C. Reynolds, “Getting more out of black hole superradiance: a statistically rigorous approach to ultralight boson constraints from black hole spin measurements,”Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society(09, 2025) staf1564

    2025

  39. [39]

    Superradiance Constraints from GW231123,

    A. Caputo, G. Franciolini, and S. J. Witte, “Superradiance Constraints from GW231123,” arXiv:2507.21788 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  40. [40]

    Ultralight boson constraints from gravitational wave observations of spinning binary black holes,

    P. S. Aswathi, W. E. East, N. Siemonsen, L. Sun, and D. Jones, “Ultralight boson constraints from gravitational wave observations of spinning binary black holes,”arXiv:2507.20979 [gr-qc]

    arXiv

  41. [41]

    Probing Axions via Spectroscopic Measurements of S-stars at the Galactic Center,

    Z. Bai, V. Cardoso, Y. Chen, T. Do, A. Hees, H. Xiao, and X. Xue, “Probing Axions via Spectroscopic Measurements of S-stars at the Galactic Center,” arXiv:2507.07482 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  42. [42]

    Probing dense environments around Sgr A* with S-star dynamics,

    G. M. Tomaselli and A. Caputo, “Probing dense environments around Sgr A* with S-star dynamics,” Phys. Rev. D113no. 8, (2026) 083035, arXiv:2509.03568 [astro-ph.GA]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  43. [43]

    Scalar Fields around Black Hole Binaries in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA,

    S. Roy, R. Vicente, J. C. Aurrekoetxea, K. Clough, and P. G. Ferreira, “Scalar Fields around Black Hole Binaries in LIGO-Virgo-KAGRA,”Phys. Rev. Lett.136 no. 19, (2026) 191402,arXiv:2510.17967 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  44. [44]

    Ring formation from black hole superradiance through repeated particle production on bound orbits,

    Z.-H. Lyu, R.-G. Cai, Z.-K. Guo, J.-F. He, and J. Liu, “Ring formation from black hole superradiance through repeated particle production on bound orbits,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 10, (2025) 104066,arXiv:2507.03490 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  45. [45]

    Constraining interacting dark energy models with black hole superradiance,

    Z.-H. Lyu, R.-G. Cai, S.-J. Wang, and X.-X. Zeng, “Constraining interacting dark energy models with black hole superradiance,”Phys. Rev. D113no. 8, (2026) 083041,arXiv:2511.16244 [astro-ph.CO]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  46. [46]

    Probing Ultralight Bosons with Binary Black Holes,

    D. Baumann, H. S. Chia, and R. A. Porto, “Probing Ultralight Bosons with Binary Black Holes,”Phys. Rev. D99no. 4, (Feb., 2019) 044001,arXiv:1804.03208 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  47. [47]

    Gravitational Collider Physics,

    D. Baumann, H. S. Chia, R. A. Porto, and J. Stout, “Gravitational Collider Physics,”Phys. Rev. D101 no. 8, (2020) 083019,arXiv:1912.04932 [gr-qc]. 7

    arXiv 2020

  48. [48]

    Ionization of gravitational atoms,

    D. Baumann, G. Bertone, J. Stout, and G. M. Tomaselli, “Ionization of gravitational atoms,”Phys. Rev. D105no. 11, (2022) 115036,arXiv:2112.14777 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    Sharp Signals of Boson Clouds in Black Hole Binary Inspirals,

    D. Baumann, G. Bertone, J. Stout, and G. M. Tomaselli, “Sharp Signals of Boson Clouds in Black Hole Binary Inspirals,”Phys. Rev. Lett.128no. 22, (2022) 221102,arXiv:2206.01212 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  50. [50]

    Ultralight boson cloud depletion in binary systems,

    E. Berti, R. Brito, C. F. B. Macedo, G. Raposo, and J. L. Rosa, “Ultralight boson cloud depletion in binary systems,”Phys. Rev. D99no. 10, (2019) 104039, arXiv:1904.03131 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  51. [51]

    Gravitational floating orbits around hairy black holes,

    J. Zhang and H. Yang, “Gravitational floating orbits around hairy black holes,”Phys. Rev. D99no. 6, (2019) 064018,arXiv:1808.02905 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  52. [52]

    Dynamic Signatures of Black Hole Binaries with Superradiant Clouds,

    J. Zhang and H. Yang, “Dynamic Signatures of Black Hole Binaries with Superradiant Clouds,”Phys. Rev. D 101no. 4, (Feb., 2020) 043020,arXiv:1907.13582 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2020

  53. [53]

    Signatures of Ultralight Bosons in the Orbital Eccentricity of Binary Black Holes,

    M. Boˇ skovi´ c, M. Koschnitzke, and R. A. Porto, “Signatures of Ultralight Bosons in the Orbital Eccentricity of Binary Black Holes,”Phys. Rev. Lett. 133no. 12, (2024) 121401,arXiv:2403.02415 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  54. [54]

    Axion cloud evaporation during inspiral of black hole binaries: The effects of backreaction and radiation,

    T. Takahashi, H. Omiya, and T. Tanaka, “Axion cloud evaporation during inspiral of black hole binaries: The effects of backreaction and radiation,”PTEP2022 no. 4, (2022) 043E01,arXiv:2112.05774 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  55. [55]

    Self-interacting axion clouds around rotating black holes in binary systems,

    T. Takahashi, H. Omiya, and T. Tanaka, “Self-interacting axion clouds around rotating black holes in binary systems,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 10, (2024) 104038,arXiv:2408.08349 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  56. [56]

    Signatures of ultralight bosons in compact binary inspiral and outspiral,

    Y. Cao and Y. Tang, “Signatures of ultralight bosons in compact binary inspiral and outspiral,”Phys. Rev. D 108no. 12, (2023) 123017,arXiv:2307.05181 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

  57. [57]

    Termination of superradiance from a binary companion,

    X. Tong, Y. Wang, and H.-Y. Zhu, “Termination of superradiance from a binary companion,”Phys. Rev. D 106no. 4, (2022) 043002,arXiv:2205.10527 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2022

  58. [58]

    Dynamical friction in gravitational atoms,

    G. M. Tomaselli, T. F. M. Spieksma, and G. Bertone, “Dynamical friction in gravitational atoms,”JCAP07 (2023) 070,arXiv:2305.15460 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2023

  59. [59]

    Resonant history of gravitational atoms in black hole binaries,

    G. M. Tomaselli, T. F. M. Spieksma, and G. Bertone, “Resonant history of gravitational atoms in black hole binaries,”Phys. Rev. D110no. 6, (2024) 064048, arXiv:2403.03147 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  60. [60]

    Legacy of boson clouds on black hole binaries,

    G. M. Tomaselli, T. F. M. Spieksma, and G. Bertone, “Legacy of boson clouds on black hole binaries,”Phys. Rev. Lett.133no. 12, (Sept., 2024) 121402, arXiv:2407.12908 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  61. [61]

    Superradiant clouds may be relevant for close compact object binaries,

    A. Guo, J. Zhang, and H. Yang, “Superradiant clouds may be relevant for close compact object binaries,” Phys. Rev. D110no. 2, (2024) 023022, arXiv:2401.15003 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2024

  62. [62]

    Common envelope evolution of ultralight boson clouds,

    A. Guo, Q.-Y. Zhang, H. Yang, and J. Zhang, “Common envelope evolution of ultralight boson clouds,”Phys. Rev. D113no. 4, (2026) 043018, arXiv:2508.18738 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2026

  63. [63]

    Gravitational waves from superradiant cloud level transition,

    S.-T. Peng and J. Zhang, “Gravitational waves from superradiant cloud level transition,”Phys. Rev. D113 no. 6, (2026) 064038,arXiv:2504.00728 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2026

  64. [64]

    Probing Boson Clouds with Supermassive Black Hole Binaries,

    X. Li, J. Ren, and X.-L. Zhang, “Probing Boson Clouds with Supermassive Black Hole Binaries,” arXiv:2505.02866 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  65. [65]

    Gravitational waves from resonant transitions of tidally perturbed gravitational atoms,

    A. Kyriazis and F. Yang, “Gravitational waves from resonant transitions of tidally perturbed gravitational atoms,”JHEP11(2025) 062,arXiv:2503.18121 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2025

  66. [66]

    Smooth binary evolution from wide resonances in boson clouds,

    G. M. Tomaselli, “Smooth binary evolution from wide resonances in boson clouds,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 6, (2025) 063033,arXiv:2507.15110 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  67. [67]

    Self-gravity in superradiance clouds: Implications for binary dynamics and observational prospects,

    H. Kim and A. Lenoci, “Self-gravity in superradiance clouds: Implications for binary dynamics and observational prospects,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 10, (2025) 104014,arXiv:2508.08367 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  68. [68]

    Detectability of gravitational atoms in black hole binaries with the Einstein Telescope,

    R. Della Monica and R. Brito, “Detectability of gravitational atoms in black hole binaries with the Einstein Telescope,”Phys. Rev. D112no. 2, (2025) 024074,arXiv:2503.23419 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  69. [69]

    Environmental Effects in Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals: Perturbations to the Environment in Kerr Spacetimes,

    C. Dyson, T. F. M. Spieksma, R. Brito, M. van de Meent, and S. Dolan, “Environmental Effects in Extreme-Mass-Ratio Inspirals: Perturbations to the Environment in Kerr Spacetimes,”Phys. Rev. Lett.134 no. 21, (2025) 211403,arXiv:2501.09806 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  70. [70]

    Extreme mass-ratio inspiral within an ultralight scalar cloud: Scalar radiation,

    D. Li, C. Weller, P. Bourg, M. LaHaye, N. Yunes, and H. Yang, “Extreme mass-ratio inspiral within an ultralight scalar cloud: Scalar radiation,”Phys. Rev. D 112no. 8, (2025) 084057,arXiv:2507.02045 [gr-qc]

    arXiv 2025

  71. [71]

    Resonances as signatures of scalar clouds in eccentric extreme-mass-ratio inspirals,

    Q.-X. Xu, R. Brito, R. Della Monica, R. Vicente, and C. Yuan, “Resonances as signatures of scalar clouds in eccentric extreme-mass-ratio inspirals,” arXiv:2605.03756 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  72. [72]

    New sources of gravitational wave signals: The black hole graviton laser,

    ´E. Dupuis and M. B. Paranjape, “New sources of gravitational wave signals: The black hole graviton laser,”Int. J. Mod. Phys. D27no. 14, (2018) 1847009, arXiv:1807.03163 [gr-qc]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  73. [73]

    Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes,

    R. H. Dicke, “Coherence in spontaneous radiation processes,”Phys. Rev.93(Jan, 1954) 99–110

    1954

  74. [74]

    Cooperative radiation processes in two-level systems: Superfluorescence,

    R. Bonifacio and L. A. Lugiato, “Cooperative radiation processes in two-level systems: Superfluorescence,” Phys. Rev. A11(May, 1975) 1507–1521

    1975

  75. [75]

    Theory of superradiance in an extended, optically thick medium,

    J. C. MacGillivray and M. S. Feld, “Theory of superradiance in an extended, optically thick medium,” Phys. Rev. A14(Sep, 1976) 1169–1189

    1976

  76. [76]

    Superradiance: An essay on the theory of collective spontaneous emission,

    M. Gross and S. Haroche, “Superradiance: An essay on the theory of collective spontaneous emission,”Physics Reports93no. 5, (1982) 301–396

    1982

  77. [77]

    Maggiore,Gravitational Waves: Volume 1: Theory and Experiments

    M. Maggiore,Gravitational Waves: Volume 1: Theory and Experiments. Oxford University Press, 10, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof: oso/9780198570745.001.0001

    work page doi:10.1093/acprof: 2007

  78. [78]

    The construction and use of LISA sensitivity curves,

    T. Robson, N. J. Cornish, and C. Liu, “The construction and use of LISA sensitivity curves,”Class. Quant. Grav.36no. 10, (2019) 105011, arXiv:1803.01944 [astro-ph.HE]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2019

  79. [79]

    Detector configuration of DECIGO/BBO and identification of cosmological neutron-star binaries,

    K. Yagi and N. Seto, “Detector configuration of DECIGO/BBO and identification of cosmological neutron-star binaries,”Phys. Rev. D83(2011) 044011, 8 arXiv:1101.3940 [astro-ph.CO]. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.D 95, 109901 (2017)]. 9 Supplemental Material: Gravitational superfluorescence from superradiant axion clouds A. GRA VIT A TIONAL-A TOM CONVENTIONS AND CHANNEL...

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  80. [80]

    1 solves Eq

    Projecting onto the helicity selected by the transition matrix element, Ψ =h ijeL ij andS=S ijeL ij, and splitting the total field into external and self-generated contributions Ψ = Ψ E + ΨS, gives the reduced atom–field system ˙c1 =iκ[Ψ E(t,0) + ΨS(t,0)]e −iδωt c2 ,˙c 2 =iκ[Ψ ∗ E(t,0) + Ψ∗ S(t,0)]e +iδωt c1 , ∂2 t ΨS −2iω∂ tΨS − ∇2ΨS −ω 2ΨS =ηS(x)c 1c∗ 2...

    1902