pith. sign in

arxiv: 2605.22495 · v1 · pith:UTKGJGYNnew · submitted 2026-05-21 · 🌀 gr-qc · hep-th

Black hole dark monopole system

Marek Rogatko This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-22 05:02 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌀 gr-qc hep-th
keywords black holedark monopoledark photonangular momentummagnetic chargeperturbationaxisymmetric spacetime
0
0 comments X

The pith

A black hole dark monopole system with electric charges from visible and dark sectors has angular momentum even when the charges are at rest.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

This paper examines electrical charges from visible and dark matter sectors positioned near magnetic poles of both sectors around a black hole. It establishes that the overall system acquires angular momentum even though the electric charges themselves remain stationary. When these charges are modeled as small perturbations added to a spherically symmetric magnetically charged static black hole in dark photon theory, the far-field behavior matches that of a stationary axisymmetric magnetically charged black hole.

Core claim

The considered system has an angular momentum despite the charges are at rest. Investigation of the behavior of electric charges of visible and hidden sectors held at rest outside a magnetically charged black hole discloses that even if the electric charges are regarded as perturbations on a spherically symmetric magnetic static black hole in dark photon theory, at large distances it looks like a stationary axisymmetric magnetically charged black hole.

What carries the argument

Perturbative addition of electric charges from visible and hidden sectors to a spherically symmetric magnetically charged static black hole in dark photon theory, producing angular momentum and axisymmetric far-field behavior.

If this is right

  • Angular momentum appears in the system without any motion of the electric charges.
  • The configuration at large distances resembles a stationary axisymmetric magnetically charged black hole.
  • Interactions between visible and dark sector charges and magnetic poles are responsible for the generated angular momentum.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Hidden sector effects could contribute to observed black hole spin parameters in a way distinguishable from standard Kerr solutions.
  • The perturbative approach might extend to other hidden gauge field models around black holes to predict similar far-field symmetries.
  • Detection of unexpected angular momentum in magnetically charged black hole candidates could provide indirect evidence for dark photon interactions.

Load-bearing premise

Electric charges from visible and hidden sectors can be treated as small perturbations on a spherically symmetric magnetically charged static black hole without changing the underlying symmetry or needing full backreaction.

What would settle it

A calculation or observation showing that the large-distance metric of the perturbed black hole fails to match a stationary axisymmetric magnetically charged solution, or that angular momentum vanishes, would refute the claim.

read the original abstract

We scrutinize properties of electrical charges bounded to visible and dark matter sectors, in the vicinity of a magnetic poles of both sectors. It turns out that the considered system has an angular momentum despite the charges are at rest. On the other hand, investigation the behavior of electric charges of visible and hidden sectors held at rest outside a magnetically charged black hole, discloses that even if the electric charge are regarded as perturbations on a spherically symmetric magnetic static black hole in dark photon theory, at large distances it looks like a stationary axisymmetric magnetically charged black hole.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

3 major / 2 minor

Summary. The manuscript examines electric charges from visible and hidden sectors placed at rest near the magnetic poles of a magnetically charged black hole in dark photon theory. It claims that the composite system carries nonzero angular momentum (residing in the Poynting vector) despite the charges being static, and that treating the electric charges as perturbations on the spherically symmetric static magnetic background yields an asymptotic geometry that resembles a stationary axisymmetric magnetically charged black hole at large distances.

Significance. If the perturbative construction is shown to be internally consistent, including explicit verification that the induced angular momentum does not force metric backreaction that destroys the assumed spherical symmetry at leading order, the result would illustrate a mechanism by which hidden-sector fields generate frame-dragging and axisymmetric asymptotics around static monopoles. This could be relevant for black-hole phenomenology in Einstein-Maxwell-dark-photon models and might supply concrete asymptotic observables for future comparison with numerical or observational data.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract] The central claim that nonzero angular momentum appears while charges remain at rest is load-bearing yet unsupported by any explicit integral or field expression in the provided text; the abstract states the result but supplies neither the Poynting-vector calculation nor the angular-momentum integral that would confirm it.
  2. [Perturbative Analysis] § on perturbative treatment: the assumption that electric charges (visible + hidden) can be added as perturbations while the background metric remains exactly spherically symmetric is inconsistent with the Einstein equations once a nonzero angular-momentum density is present; the stress-energy of the monopole-charge configuration must source metric perturbations at the same order, and the paper must demonstrate that these perturbations preserve spherical symmetry to leading order or solve the coupled system.
  3. [Asymptotic Behavior] The assertion that the far-field geometry 'looks like a stationary axisymmetric magnetically charged black hole' lacks a concrete asymptotic metric form (e.g., specific multipole expansion or comparison to the Kerr-Newman or dyonic axisymmetric solutions); without this, it is impossible to verify that axisymmetry emerges from the spherical background without additional assumptions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Abstract] Abstract contains grammatical errors: 'investigation the behavior' should read 'investigating the behavior'; 'electric charge are' should read 'electric charges are'.
  2. [Notation] Notation for visible versus hidden-sector fields and their coupling constants to the dark photon should be introduced explicitly and used consistently throughout.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

3 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading and constructive comments on our manuscript. We address each major comment point by point below and indicate the revisions we intend to implement.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Abstract] The central claim that nonzero angular momentum appears while charges remain at rest is load-bearing yet unsupported by any explicit integral or field expression in the provided text; the abstract states the result but supplies neither the Poynting-vector calculation nor the angular-momentum integral that would confirm it.

    Authors: We agree that the abstract would benefit from greater explicitness. The nonzero angular momentum is obtained by integrating the Poynting vector associated with the visible and hidden-sector electromagnetic fields over a large sphere; this integral is evaluated in Section 3 of the manuscript. In the revised version we will insert a concise reference to this calculation directly into the abstract. revision: yes

  2. Referee: [Perturbative Analysis] § on perturbative treatment: the assumption that electric charges (visible + hidden) can be added as perturbations while the background metric remains exactly spherically symmetric is inconsistent with the Einstein equations once a nonzero angular-momentum density is present; the stress-energy of the monopole-charge configuration must source metric perturbations at the same order, and the paper must demonstrate that these perturbations preserve spherical symmetry to leading order or solve the coupled system.

    Authors: This is a substantive consistency issue. Our present treatment places the electric charges on a fixed spherically symmetric magnetic background and works to leading order in the charge strengths. We will add an explicit verification that the angular-momentum density sources metric perturbations whose leading correction remains spherically symmetric (or is higher order in the perturbative parameter) at the distances relevant for the asymptotic analysis. If a coupled solution is required, we will outline the linearized Einstein equations and their solution at that order. revision: yes

  3. Referee: [Asymptotic Behavior] The assertion that the far-field geometry 'looks like a stationary axisymmetric magnetically charged black hole' lacks a concrete asymptotic metric form (e.g., specific multipole expansion or comparison to the Kerr-Newman or dyonic axisymmetric solutions); without this, it is impossible to verify that axisymmetry emerges from the spherical background without additional assumptions.

    Authors: We concur that an explicit asymptotic expansion would strengthen the claim. In the revision we will derive the leading far-field metric components, present the relevant multipole terms, and compare them with the asymptotic structure of a stationary axisymmetric dyonic black-hole solution (e.g., the appropriate limit of the Kerr-Newman family with magnetic charge). revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected in derivation chain

full rationale

The paper presents results from direct investigation of electric charges (visible and hidden sectors) near magnetic poles in the Einstein-Maxwell-dark-photon framework, claiming nonzero angular momentum for static charges and asymptotic axisymmetric behavior under perturbative treatment on a spherical magnetic black hole background. No quoted equations, self-citations, fitted parameters, or ansatzes reduce the central claims to inputs by construction. The derivation relies on the underlying field equations and perturbative expansion without self-definitional loops or load-bearing self-references. The setup is self-contained; any potential inconsistency with backreaction is a separate correctness question, not circularity.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only review yields no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities. The setup implicitly assumes dark photon theory and perturbation validity around magnetic black holes.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5599 in / 1078 out tokens · 36057 ms · 2026-05-22T05:02:55.015192+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

What do these tags mean?
matches
The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports
The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends
The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses
The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts
The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear
Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

66 extracted references · 66 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    ∂θAϕ( ˜E)E θ ( ˜E) +∂ θAϕ( ˜B)E θ ( ˜B) i .(18) Further integration by parts and the remark thatE θ ( ˜E) andE θ ( ˜B) vanish atθ= 0 andθ=π, authorize that Jz =− 1 4π Z drdθdϕ

    black holes spacetime was revealed. As far as thedark sectoris concerned, magnetized particle motion and collision process analysis of two particles in the spacetime of a static black hole influenced by weak magnetic fields stemming from visible anddark mattersectors, have been analyzed in [18]. The synchrotron radiation of a massive charged under visible...

    work page

  2. [2]

    we have nodark matter, i.e.,α= 0, e d = 0, g B = 0, then the equation (24) is given by 2 ℏ e g E ∈Z,(25) one obtains the Dirac-like quantization conditions, known in Maxwell theory

    work page

  3. [3]

    2π a gE − 2π b gB # ,(33) Φ ˜B = √2 +α 2

    we sete d = 0, one arrives at the following generalization of Dirac quantization condition, taking into accountdark mattersector 2 ℏ e gE + α 2 gB ∈Z.(26) IV. POSSIBLE OBSER V A TIONAL CONSEQUENCES OF DARK MONOPOLE EXISTENCE Up to now the detection of monopoles constitutes a big challenge for the experimental physics. A variety of sophisticated techniques...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Static black hole solution with dark matter sector The line element of static spherically symmetric black hole in the theory in question, with timelike Killing vector ( ∂ ∂t )a orthogonal to the spacelike hypersurface in this spacetime, is given by [43] ds2 =− 1− 2m r + g2 E +αg EgB +g 2 B r2 dt2 + dr2 1− 2m r + g2 E+αgE gB+g2 B r2 +r 2 dθ2 + sin2 θdϕ2 , ...

    work page

  5. [5]

    Rotating black hole with dark matter sector The solution of Einstein-Maxwelldark photontheory o gravity describing the stationary axisymmetric black hole was obtained in Ref. [60]. It has been also proved that stationary axisymmetric solutions of the aforementioned theory of gravity subject to the same boundary and regularity conditions (Kerr-Newman-liked...

    work page 2022

  6. [6]

    Hanni and R

    R.S. Hanni and R. Ruffini,Lines of force of a point charge near a Schwarzschild black hole, Phys. Rev. D8, 3259 (1973)

    work page 1973

  7. [7]

    Cohen and R.M

    J.M. Cohen and R.M. Wald,Point charge in the vicinity of a Schwarzschild black hole,J. Math. Phys.12(1971) 1845

    work page 1971

  8. [8]

    Linet,Electrostatics and magnetostatics in the Schwarzschild metric,J

    B. Linet,Electrostatics and magnetostatics in the Schwarzschild metric,J. Phys. A: Math. Gen.9(1976) 1081, B. Leaute and B. Linet,Electrostatics in a Reissner-Nordstr¨ om space- time,Phys. Lett. A58(1976) 5

    work page 1976

  9. [9]

    J. A. Petterson,Magnetic field of a current loop around a Schwarzschild black hole,Phys. Rev. D10, 3166 (1974)

    work page 1974

  10. [10]

    D. Bini, A. Geralico, and R. Ruffini,On the equilibrium of a charged massive particle in the field of a Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black hole,Phys. Lett. A360(2007) 515 , D. Bini, A. Geralico, and R. Ruffini,Charged massive particle at rest in the field of a Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black hole, Phys. Rev. D75, 044012 (2007)

    work page 2007

  11. [11]

    R. M. Wald,Black hole in a uniform magnetic field,Phys. Rev. D10, 1680 (1974)

    work page 1974

  12. [12]

    Bicak and L

    J. Bicak and L. Dvorak,Stationary electromagnetic fields around black holes. 3. General solutions and the fields of current loops near the Reissner-Nordstr¨ om black hole,Phys. Rev. D22, 2933 (1980)

    work page 1980

  13. [13]

    Chamblin, R

    A. Chamblin, R. Emparan, and G.W. Gibbons,Superconducting p-branes and extremal black holes,Phys. Rev. D58, 084009 (1998)

    work page 1998

  14. [14]

    Abdulxamidov, J

    F. Abdulxamidov, J. Rayimbaev, A. Abdujabbarov, and Z. Stuchlik,Spinning magnetized particles orbiting magnetized Schwarzschild black holes,Phys. Rev. D108, 044030 (2023)

    work page 2023

  15. [15]

    M. Qi, J. Rayimbaev, and B. Ahmedov,Charged particles and quasiperiodic oscillations around magnetized Schwarzschild black hole,Eur. Phys. J. C83730 (2023)

    work page 2023

  16. [16]

    Ullah Khan, O

    S. Ullah Khan, O. Abdurkhmonov, J. Rayimbaev, S. Ahmedov, Y. Turaev, and S. Muminov, Circular motion and collisions of particles with magnetic dipole moment and electric charge 18 in dipolar magnetosphere around Schwarzschild black holes,Eur. Phys. J. C84650 (2024)

    work page 2024

  17. [17]

    V. P. Frolov and A. A. Shoom,Motion of charged particles near a weakly magnetized Schwarzschild black hole,Phys. Rev. D82, 084034 (2010)

    work page 2010

  18. [18]

    V. P. Frolov,Weakly magnetized black holes as particle accelerators,Phys. Rev. D85, 024020 (2012)

    work page 2012

  19. [19]

    A. M. Al Zahrani, V. P. Frolov, and A. A. Shoom,Critical escape velocity for a charged particle moving around a weakly magnetized Schwarzschild black hole,Phys. Rev. D87, 084043 (2013)

    work page 2013

  20. [20]

    de Felice and F

    F. de Felice and F. Sorge,Magnetized orbits around a Schwarzschild black hole,Class. Quant. Grav.20(2003) 469

    work page 2003

  21. [21]

    J. R. Rayimbaev,Magnetized particle motion around non-Schwarzschild black hole immersed in an external uniform magnetic field,Astrophys. Space Sci.361, 288 (2016)

    work page 2016

  22. [22]

    Abdujabbarov, J

    A. Abdujabbarov, J. Rayimbaev, B. Turimov, and F. Atamurotov,Dynamics of magnetized particles around 4-D Einstein Gauss-Bonnet black hole,Phys. of Dark Universe30, 100715 (2020)

    work page 2020

  23. [23]

    Rogatko and P

    M. Rogatko and P. Verma,Influence of dark photon on magnetized and charged particle orbits around static spherically symmetric black hole,Phys. Rev. D111, 084042 (2025)

    work page 2025

  24. [24]

    Rogatko and P

    M. Rogatko and P. Verma,Can synchrotron radiation reveal the presence of dark sector around black hole?,Eur. Phys. J. C85205 (2025)

    work page 2025

  25. [25]

    Garfinkle and S-J

    D. Garfinkle and S-J. Roy,Angular momentum of an electric charge and magnetically charged black hole,Phys. Lett. B257, 158 (1991)

    work page 1991

  26. [26]

    J. H. Kim and S-H. Moon,Electric charge in interaction with magnetically charged black holes, JHEP09(2007) 088

    work page 2007

  27. [27]

    Bunster and M

    C. Bunster and M. Henneaux,A monopole near a black hole,PNAS104(2007) 12243

    work page 2007

  28. [28]

    Br¨ ummer and J

    F. Br¨ ummer and J. Jaeckel,Minicharges and magnetic monopoles,Phys. Lett. B675, 360 (2009)

    work page 2009

  29. [29]

    Filzinger, S

    M. Filzinger, S. D¨ orscher, R. Lange, J. Klose, M. Steinel, E. Benkler, E. Peik, C. Lisdat, and N. Huntemann,Improved Limits on the Coupling of Ultralight Bosonic Dark Matter to Photons from Optical Atomic Clock Comparisons,Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 253001 (2023)

    work page 2023

  30. [30]

    Ramanathan, N

    K. Ramanathan, N. Klimovich, R. Basu Thakur, B.H. Eom, H.G. Leduc, S. Shu, A.D. Beyer, and P.K. Day,Wideband Direct Detection Constraints on Hidden Photon Dark Matter with the QUALIPHIDE Experiment,Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 231001 (2023). 19

    work page 2023

  31. [31]

    Kotaka, S

    S. Kotaka, S. Adachi, R. Fujinaka, S. Honda, H. Nakata, Y. Seino, Y. Sueno, T. Sumida, J. Suzuki, O. Tajima, and S. Takeichi,Search for Dark Photon Dark Matter in the Mass Range 74−110µeVwith a Cryogenic Millimeter-Wave Receiver,Phys. Rev. Lett.130, 071805 (2023)

    work page 2023

  32. [32]

    Holdom,TwoU(1)’s andϵcharge shifts,Phys

    B. Holdom,TwoU(1)’s andϵcharge shifts,Phys. Lett. B166, 196 (1986)

    work page 1986

  33. [33]

    Caputo, A.J

    A. Caputo, A.J. Miller, C.A.J. O’Hare, and E. Vitagliano,Dark photon limits: A handbook, Phys. Rev. D104, 095029 (2021)

    work page 2021

  34. [34]

    Acharya, S.A.R

    B.S. Acharya, S.A.R. Ellis, G.L. Kane, B.D. Nelson, and M.J. Perry,Lightest Visible-Sector Supersymmetric Particle is Likely Unstable,Phys. Rev. Lett.117, 181802 (2016)

    work page 2016

  35. [35]

    Jeanet al.,Early SPI/INTEGRAL measurements of 511 keV line emission from the 4th quadrant of the Galaxy,Astron

    P. Jeanet al.,Early SPI/INTEGRAL measurements of 511 keV line emission from the 4th quadrant of the Galaxy,Astron. Astrophys.407(2003) L55

    work page 2003

  36. [36]

    Changet al.,An excess of cosmic ray electrons at energies of 300-800 GeV,Nature456, (2008) 362

    J. Changet al.,An excess of cosmic ray electrons at energies of 300-800 GeV,Nature456, (2008) 362

    work page 2008

  37. [37]

    Bulbul et al.,Detection of an unidentified emission line in the stacked X-ray spectrum of galaxy clusters,Astrophys

    E. Bulbul et al.,Detection of an unidentified emission line in the stacked X-ray spectrum of galaxy clusters,Astrophys. J.789(2014) 13

    work page 2014

  38. [38]

    Filippi and M

    A. Filippi and M. De Napoli,Searching in the dark: the hunt for the dark photon,Reviews in Phys.5100042 (2020)

    work page 2020

  39. [39]

    Geringer-Sameth and M.G

    A. Geringer-Sameth and M.G. Walker,Indication of Gamma-Ray Emission from the Newly Discovered Dwarf Galaxy Reticulum II,Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 081101 (2015)

    work page 2015

  40. [40]

    Boddy and J

    K.K. Boddy and J. Kumar,Indirect detection of dark matter using MeV-range gamma-rays telescopes,Phys. Rev. D92, 023533 (2015)

    work page 2015

  41. [41]

    Leefer, L

    K.Van Tilburg, N. Leefer, L. Bougas, and D. Budker,Search for Ultralight Scalar Dark Matter with Atomic Spectroscopy,Phys. Rev. Lett.115, 011802 (2015)

    work page 2015

  42. [42]

    Chang, R

    J.H. Chang, R. Essig, and S.D. McDermott,Revisiting Supernova 1987A constraints on dark photons,JHEP01(2017) 107

    work page 2017

  43. [43]

    Crisler et

    M. Crisler et. al. (SENSEI Collaboration),SENSEI: First Direct-Detection Constraints on Sub-GeV Dark Matter from a Surface Run,Phys. Rev. Lett.121, 061803 (2019)

    work page 2019

  44. [44]

    Lees et al.,Search for a Dark Photon ine +e− Collisions at BABAR,Phys

    J.P. Lees et al.,Search for a Dark Photon ine +e− Collisions at BABAR,Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 201801 (2014)

    work page 2014

  45. [45]

    Davier et al.,Reevaluation of the hadronic contributions to the muon g-2 and toα(M 2 z ), Eur

    M. Davier et al.,Reevaluation of the hadronic contributions to the muon g-2 and toα(M 2 z ), Eur. Phys. J. C711515 (2011) . 20

    work page 2011

  46. [46]

    Alonso-Alvarez and D

    G. Alonso-Alvarez and D. Curtin,Dark astronomy with dark matter detectors,JCAP05, (2025) 082

    work page 2025

  47. [47]

    Bertone and T.M.P

    G. Bertone and T.M.P. Tait,A new era in the search for dark matter,Nature562, (2018) 51

    work page 2018

  48. [48]

    Kiczek and M

    B. Kiczek and M. Rogatko,Ultra-compact spherically symmetric dark matter charged star, JCAP09, (2019) 049

    work page 2019

  49. [49]

    Kiczek and M

    B. Kiczek and M. Rogatko,Influence of black matter on black scalar hair,Phys. Rev. D101, 084035 (2020)

    work page 2020

  50. [50]

    Kiczek and M

    B. Kiczek and M. Rogatko,Axion-like dark matter clouds around rotating black holes,Phys. Rev. D103, 124021 (2021)

    work page 2021

  51. [51]

    Kiczek and M

    B. Kiczek and M. Rogatko,Static axion-like dark matter clouds around magnetized rotating wormholes - probe limit case,Eur. Phys. J. C82586 (2022)

    work page 2022

  52. [52]

    Fischler and W

    W. Fischler and W. Tangarife Garcia,Hierarchies of SUSY Splittings and Invisible Photinos as Dark Matter,JHEP01(2011) 025, C. Gomez Sanchez and B. Holdom,Monopoles, strings and dark matter,Phys. Rev. D83, 123524 (2011), S. Baek, P. Ko and W.-I. Park, Hidden sector monopole, vector dark matter and dark radiation with Higgs portal,JCAP10, (2014) 067, V.V. K...

    work page 2011

  53. [53]

    Terring and C

    J. Terring and C. B. Verhaasen,Detecting dark matter with Aharonov-Bohm,JHEP12(2019) 152

    work page 2019

  54. [54]

    M. L. Graerrer, I. M. Shoemaker, and N. T. Arellano,Milli-magnetic monopole dark matter and the survival of galactic magnetic fields,JHEP03(2022) 105

    work page 2022

  55. [55]

    Vento,Primordial monopolium as dark matter,Eur

    V. Vento,Primordial monopolium as dark matter,Eur. Phys. J. C812021 (229)

    work page

  56. [56]

    J. Yang, R. Zhou, and L. Bian,Gravitational waves and monopoles from first-order phase transitions,Phys. Lett. B839, 137822 (2023)

    work page 2023

  57. [57]

    Hiramatsu, M

    T. Hiramatsu, M. Ibe, M. Suzuki, and S. Yamaguchi,Gauge kinetic mixing and dark topological defects,JHEP12(2021) 122

    work page 2021

  58. [58]

    Chitose and M

    A. Chitose and M. Ibe,Interactions of electrical and magnetic charges and dark topological defects,Phys. Rev. D108, 035044 (2023)

    work page 2023

  59. [59]

    Preskill,Magnetic monopoles,Ann

    J. Preskill,Magnetic monopoles,Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.34(1984) 461. 21

    work page 1984

  60. [60]

    Aharonov and D

    Y. Aharonov and D. Bohm,Significance of electromagnetic potentials in the quantum theory, Phys. Rev.115(1959) 485

    work page 1959

  61. [61]

    Felsanger,Geometry, Particles, and Fields, Springer, New York 1998

    B. Felsanger,Geometry, Particles, and Fields, Springer, New York 1998

    work page 1998

  62. [62]

    Chambers,Shift of an Electron Interference Pattern by Enclosed Magnetic Flux,Phys

    R.G. Chambers,Shift of an Electron Interference Pattern by Enclosed Magnetic Flux,Phys. Rev. Lett.5, 3 (1960), A. Tonomuraet al.,Evidence for Aharonov-Bohm effect with magnetic field completely shielded from electron wave,Phys. Rev. Lett.56, 792 (1986)

    work page 1960

  63. [63]

    Rajantie,The search for magnetic monopoles,Physics Today69, 41 (2016)

    A. Rajantie,The search for magnetic monopoles,Physics Today69, 41 (2016)

    work page 2016

  64. [64]

    Annett,Superconductivity, Superfluids and Condensates, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2009

    J.F. Annett,Superconductivity, Superfluids and Condensates, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2009

    work page 2009

  65. [65]

    Rogatko,Dark photon-dark energy stationary axisymmetric black holes,Phys

    M. Rogatko,Dark photon-dark energy stationary axisymmetric black holes,Phys. Rev. D 109, 104030 (2024)

    work page 2024

  66. [66]

    Giacomelli and L

    G. Giacomelli and L. Patrizii,Magnetic monopole searches, hep-ex 0302011 (2003). 22

    work page 2003