REVIEW 2 cited by
Harnessing Temporal Causality for Advanced Temporal Action Detection
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
As a fundamental task in long-form video understanding, temporal action detection (TAD) aims to capture inherent temporal relations in untrimmed videos and identify candidate actions with precise boundaries. Over the years, various networks, including convolutions, graphs, and transformers, have been explored for effective temporal modeling for TAD. However, these modules typically treat past and future information equally, overlooking the crucial fact that changes in action boundaries are essentially causal events. Inspired by this insight, we propose leveraging the temporal causality of actions to enhance TAD representation by restricting the model's access to only past or future context. We introduce CausalTAD, which combines causal attention and causal Mamba to achieve state-of-the-art performance on multiple benchmarks. Notably, with CausalTAD, we ranked 1st in the Action Recognition, Action Detection, and Audio-Based Interaction Detection tracks at the EPIC-Kitchens Challenge 2024, as well as 1st in the Moment Queries track at the Ego4D Challenge 2024. Our code is available at https://github.com/sming256/OpenTAD/.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
OSGNet @ Ego4D Episodic Memory Challenge 2025
OSGNet, an early-fusion grounding model, wins all three Ego4D Episodic Memory Challenge tracks by converting localization tasks into retrieval problems.
-
Hierarchical Multi-Stage Transformer Architecture for Context-Aware Temporal Action Localization
PCL-Former, a three-tier transformer pipeline for temporal action localization, reports top average mAP on three benchmarks, but its evaluation protocol and reported margins are internally inconsistent.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.