Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Impression Network for Video Object Detection

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1712.05896 v1 pith:UXS6XQZK submitted 2017-12-16 cs.CV

classification cs.CV
keywords featureimpressiondetectionobjectvideoframeframesnetwork
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

0 comments
read the original abstract

Video object detection is more challenging compared to image object detection. Previous works proved that applying object detector frame by frame is not only slow but also inaccurate. Visual clues get weakened by defocus and motion blur, causing failure on corresponding frames. Multi-frame feature fusion methods proved effective in improving the accuracy, but they dramatically sacrifice the speed. Feature propagation based methods proved effective in improving the speed, but they sacrifice the accuracy. So is it possible to improve speed and performance simultaneously? Inspired by how human utilize impression to recognize objects from blurry frames, we propose Impression Network that embodies a natural and efficient feature aggregation mechanism. In our framework, an impression feature is established by iteratively absorbing sparsely extracted frame features. The impression feature is propagated all the way down the video, helping enhance features of low-quality frames. This impression mechanism makes it possible to perform long-range multi-frame feature fusion among sparse keyframes with minimal overhead. It significantly improves per-frame detection baseline on ImageNet VID while being 3 times faster (20 fps). We hope Impression Network can provide a new perspective on video feature enhancement. Code will be made available.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. A Delay Metric for Video Object Detection: What Average Precision Fails to Tell

    cs.CV 2019-08 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Average delay (AD), a new video object detection metric built from clipped per-instance detection delays under false-positive-ratio controls, reveals that DFF, FGFA, and CaTDet preserve mAP while increasing detection delay.

Pith tools