Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 cited by

A Survey of Methods, Challenges and Perspectives in Causality

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2302.00293 v3 pith:UZYDPQMT submitted 2023-02-01 cs.LG stat.ME

classification cs.LGstat.ME
keywords causalitydeeplearningperspectiveschallengesdatadistributionfields
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Deep Learning models have shown success in a large variety of tasks by extracting correlation patterns from high-dimensional data but still struggle when generalizing out of their initial distribution. As causal engines aim to learn mechanisms independent from a data distribution, combining Deep Learning with Causality can have a great impact on the two fields. In this paper, we further motivate this assumption. We perform an extensive overview of the theories and methods for Causality from different perspectives, with an emphasis on Deep Learning and the challenges met by the two domains. We show early attempts to bring the fields together and the possible perspectives for the future. We finish by providing a large variety of applications for techniques from Causality.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 9 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Causal Cartographer: From Mapping to Reasoning Over Counterfactual Worlds

    cs.AI 2025-05 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    An LLM agent extracts a 975-variable causal graph from 2020 oil-price news and a second agent answers counterfactual queries by step-by-step causal reasoning.

  2. Causal Analysis of ASR Errors for Children: Quantifying the Impact of Physiological, Cognitive, and Extrinsic Factors

    eess.AS 2025-02 reject novelty 6.0 of 10

    For children's ASR, word error rates are driven most by utterance length and child age, then noise and pronunciation, and fine-tuning lowers age sensitivity but not length sensitivity.

Pith tools