pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.26240 · v1 · pith:V5WHR7DFnew · submitted 2026-06-24 · ✦ hep-ph

Constraining Multiple Kinetically Mixed Dark Photons

Joerg Jaeckel , Sebastian Monath This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 01:49 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ✦ hep-ph
keywords dark photonskinetic mixingmultiple U(1) gauge bosonsCavendish experimentslight-shining-through-wallsstellar energy lossstatistical constraintsparameter space
0
0 comments X

The pith

A statistical treatment of kinetic mixing parameters allows constraints on multiple dark photons from standard experimental probes.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper examines scenarios with several dark photons that interact with the Standard Model through kinetic mixing. To navigate the large space of possible masses and mixing strengths, it applies a statistical method by sampling from different distributions over the entries of the mixing matrix. This lets the authors derive bounds from Cavendish experiments, light-shining-through-walls tests, and energy-loss arguments in stars without fixing every mixing value by hand. A reader would care because the approach shows how existing data can still limit models that contain many hidden gauge bosons. If the method is valid, it turns the high-dimensional problem into a tractable statistical one that can be confronted with current measurements.

Core claim

By considering different distributions for the kinetic mixing parameters, the high-dimensional parameter space of masses and mixings for multiple dark photons can be explored statistically, allowing the application of constraints from Cavendish experiments, light-shining-through-walls experiments, and stellar energy loss to limit the viable models.

What carries the argument

A statistical approach that samples kinetic mixing parameters from chosen distributions to survey the multi-photon parameter space.

If this is right

  • Existing experimental limits on single dark photons can be reinterpreted as statistical bounds on ensembles of dark photons.
  • Different assumed distributions for the mixing matrix produce quantitatively different allowed regions in mass-mixing space.
  • The method removes the need to choose specific numerical values for each element of the mixing matrix when setting limits.
  • Models containing several kinetically mixed U(1) factors remain testable with data already collected.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same sampling technique could be applied to other hidden-sector particles whose couplings are drawn from unknown distributions.
  • Future higher-precision experiments could tighten the allowed forms of the mixing distributions themselves.
  • Cosmological observables such as the effective number of relativistic degrees of freedom might supply independent statistical priors on the same mixing parameters.

Load-bearing premise

The kinetic mixing parameters can be usefully described by probability distributions that permit statistical sampling without fixing each entry exactly.

What would settle it

A laboratory measurement that finds a signal whose strength and mass dependence cannot be reproduced by any choice of distribution over multiple mixing parameters would falsify the claim that the statistical method yields reliable constraints.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2606.26240 by Joerg Jaeckel, Sebastian Monath.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure 1: Average bounds depending on the scaling parameter [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Figure 2: Bounds on mixing parameter A from LSW and Cavendish experiments, and longitu￾dinal photon contribution to the solar luminosity. Colored regions show the whole A range for a given M, in which at least one but not all generated sets are constrained. Green: n = 40, blue: n = 10, red: n = 3. Also shown: maximum A so that the numerical average of observables is reconcilable with observation. We assume no mixing… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Figure 3: Maximum scale parameter A for given mass M such that median (purple) and mean (green) of the considered observables do not exceed experimental limits. Distribution of couplings and masses governed by (21), dark photon mixing set to 0, p=2. Sample size N=1000; Dot-dashed: Cavendish, continuum: LSW, dashed: solar lifetime (transverse), dotted: solar lifetime (longitudinal). n=40 3.2 General mixing Considerin… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Number of “good” parameter sets as a function of DP number, double logarithmic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_4.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Smallest χmax such that for 1000 samples at least one associated Lagrangian is unstable, i.e., it features at least one negative eigenvalue in the kinetic matrix. We have gener￾ated kinetic matrices with χij distributed according to Eq. (27). Blue curve: Prediction from Wigner’s semicircle law. 0 10 20 30 40 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 Number of DPs n Ratio Avg. ϵ2 (p=4) Pre/Post-Diag 0 10 20 30 40 0.0 0.2 0.4… view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Ratio of the averages ( P i ϵ ∗ i 2 P i ϵi 2 / P i m∗2 P i m2 ) varying χmax× √ n (different choices of couplings’ powers for normalization p=1,2,4). The colors correspond to different |χmax|×√ n values: Pink: 0.5, red: 0.75, purple: 1. Mean calculated with sample size N=1000. with √ n2 = n. Accordingly, in the regime χmax ≪ 1, we expect that the shift from one scales with χ 2 max × n. This trend towards i… view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Ratio of the averages ( P i ϵ ∗ i 2 P i ϵi 2 / P i m∗2 P i m2 ) varying χmax× √ n (different choices of couplings’ powers for normalization p=1,2,4). n = 40 in all plots. The plotted quantity is averaged with the sample size N=1000. With this choice, we may expect that the effects of non-diagonal kinetic terms will introduce no further strong n-dependence. This conjecture is supported by [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Maximum scale parameter A for given mass M such that numerical median (purple) and mean (green) of the considered observables do not exceed experimental limits. Case with non-trivial mixings χij between DP species. Distribution of couplings and masses governed by (21) and (22), p=2. Sample size N=1000. Dot-dashed: Cavendish, continuum: LSW, dashed: solar lifetime (transverse), dotted: solar lifetime (longi… view at source ↗
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Median bounds on scaling parameter A allowing for kinetic mixings between the DP species. We show the maximal A such that the numerical median of observables is reconcilable with observation. Green: n = 40, blue: n = 10, red: n = 3. Dashed: Transversal solar bounds, dotted: Longitudinal solar bounds, continuous: LSW bounds, dot-dashed: Cavendish bounds. Left: p=1, right: p=2. Sample size N=1000. χmax × √ n… view at source ↗
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Bounds on the scaling parameter A allowing for kinetic mixing between the DP species. From left to right the curves correspond to Cavendish and LSW experiments as well as the longitudinal photon contribution to the solar luminosity. Colored regions show all the coupling parameters A for given M, in which at least one but not all generated parameter sets are constrained. Also shown: Maximal value of A so t… view at source ↗
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: n-dependence of the limits based on the considered observables (cf. captions). +(-): shows mean, with (without) kinetic mixing. x(o) shows median with (without) kinetic mixing. Green: p=4, blue: p=2, red: p=1. Scale parameter A normalized to 1. Mass values around the peaks in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_11.png] view at source ↗
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: n-dependence of Median(x) and Mean(+) of limits on A from LSW detection rates when demanding that different choices of the couplings’ powers are fixed. The quantities are normalized with their counterpart in the absence of kinetic mixing in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_12.png] view at source ↗
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: For the constraints under consideration: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_13.png] view at source ↗
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Examples of the statistical distributions of the physical effects in different settings (cf. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_14.png] view at source ↗
read the original abstract

Extra U(1) gauge bosons under which Standard Model particles are uncharged, aka dark photons, are a simple and well-motivated extension of the Standard Model. There could be a single, but also several or even many such dark photons. However, most studies consider only a single dark photon. Here, we want to look at the more general case of multiple dark photons interacting with the Standard Model via kinetic mixing. We consider a range of standard probes, Cavendish experiments, light-shining-through-walls experiments, as well as energy loss in stars. To explore the rather high-dimensional parameter space of the masses and the kinetic mixing matrix, we pursue a statistical approach, considering different distributions for the kinetic mixing parameters.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 1 minor

Summary. The manuscript proposes a statistical approach to constrain multiple dark photons that kinetically mix with the Standard Model photon. Rather than fixing individual entries in the kinetic mixing matrix, the authors consider different distributions for the mixing parameters to explore the high-dimensional space of masses and mixings. Constraints are derived from Cavendish experiments, light-shining-through-walls experiments, and stellar energy loss.

Significance. If the statistical method is robust, the work provides a framework for deriving bounds on multi-dark-photon scenarios without requiring specific fixed values for each mixing parameter, addressing a dimensionality challenge that single-dark-photon studies avoid. This extends the literature on kinetically mixed vectors in a model-independent direction. The paper is credited for directly targeting the high-dimensional parameter space via distributional assumptions rather than point values.

minor comments (1)
  1. The abstract would benefit from a concise statement of the specific distributions adopted and the quantitative improvement (or lack thereof) relative to single-dark-photon limits.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the positive summary, significance assessment, and recommendation of minor revision. The report contains no specific major comments to address.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity detected

full rationale

The paper introduces a statistical sampling method over distributions of kinetic mixing parameters to handle the high-dimensional space of multiple dark photons, then applies this to standard observables from Cavendish, LSW, and stellar cooling experiments. No derivation step reduces a claimed result to a fitted input by construction, nor does any load-bearing premise rest on a self-citation chain or imported uniqueness theorem. The central construction is the choice of statistical distributions themselves, which is presented as an ansatz for exploration rather than a derived prediction; this does not trigger any of the enumerated circularity patterns. The work is therefore self-contained as a methodological proposal.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 0 axioms · 0 invented entities

Abstract-only; no explicit free parameters, axioms, or invented entities are stated. The central claim rests on the unstated premise that the chosen statistical distributions adequately represent the physically allowed mixing matrices.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5641 in / 973 out tokens · 16363 ms · 2026-06-26T01:49:14.492284+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

60 extracted references · 6 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Limits of Electrodynamics: Paraphotons?,

    L. B. Okun, “Limits of Electrodynamics: Paraphotons?,”Sov. Phys. JETP56(1982) 502

    1982

  2. [2]

    Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts,

    B. Holdom, “Two U(1)’s and Epsilon Charge Shifts,”Phys. Lett. B166(1986) 196–198

    1986

  3. [3]

    Comment on Z Z-prime mixing in extended gauge theories,

    R. Foot and X.-G. He, “Comment on Z Z-prime mixing in extended gauge theories,” Phys. Lett. B267(1991) 509–512

    1991

  4. [4]

    Influence of strongly coupled, hidden scalars on Higgs signals,

    T. Binoth and J. J. van der Bij, “Influence of strongly coupled, hidden scalars on Higgs signals,”Z. Phys. C75(1997) 17–25,arXiv:hep-ph/9608245

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  5. [5]

    A Minimal spontaneously broken hidden sector and its impact on Higgs boson physics at the large hadron collider,

    R. M. Schabinger and J. D. Wells, “A Minimal spontaneously broken hidden sector and its impact on Higgs boson physics at the large hadron collider,”Phys. Rev. D72(2005) 093007,arXiv:hep-ph/0509209

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  6. [6]

    Higgs-field portal into hidden sectors,

    B. Patt and F. Wilczek, “Higgs-field portal into hidden sectors,”arXiv:hep-ph/0605188

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  7. [7]

    Probing Hidden Sector Photons through the Higgs Window,

    M. Ahlers, J. Jaeckel, J. Redondo, and A. Ringwald, “Probing Hidden Sector Photons through the Higgs Window,”Phys. Rev. D78(2008) 075005,arXiv:0807.4143 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  8. [8]

    Probing a Secluded U(1) at B-factories,

    B. Batell, M. Pospelov, and A. Ritz, “Probing a Secluded U(1) at B-factories,”Phys. Rev. D79(2009) 115008,arXiv:0903.0363 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  9. [9]

    Physics Beyond Colliders at CERN: Beyond the Standard Model Working Group Report,

    J. Beachamet al., “Physics Beyond Colliders at CERN: Beyond the Standard Model Working Group Report,”J. Phys. G47no. 1, (2020) 010501,arXiv:1901.09966 [hep-ex]

    arXiv 2020

  10. [10]

    Feebly-interacting particles: FIPs 2020 workshop report,

    P. Agrawalet al., “Feebly-interacting particles: FIPs 2020 workshop report,”Eur. Phys. J. C81no. 11, (2021) 1015,arXiv:2102.12143 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2020

  11. [11]

    Feebly-interacting particles: FIPs 2022 Workshop Report,

    C. Antelet al., “Feebly-interacting particles: FIPs 2022 Workshop Report,”Eur. Phys. J. C83no. 12, (2023) 1122,arXiv:2305.01715 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2022

  12. [12]

    Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons,

    F. Englert and R. Brout, “Broken Symmetry and the Mass of Gauge Vector Mesons,” Phys. Rev. Lett.13(1964) 321–323

    1964

  13. [13]

    Broken symmetries and the masses of gauge bosons,

    P. W. Higgs, “Broken symmetries and the masses of gauge bosons,”Physical review letters13no. 16, (1964) 508

    1964

  14. [14]

    Interaction forces in electrodynamics and in the field theory of nuclear forces,

    E. C. G. Stueckelberg, “Interaction forces in electrodynamics and in the field theory of nuclear forces,”Helv. Phys. Acta11(1938) 299–328

    1938

  15. [15]

    Massless gauge bosons other than the photon,

    B. A. Dobrescu, “Massless gauge bosons other than the photon,”Phys. Rev. Lett.94 (2005) 151802,arXiv:hep-ph/0411004

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  16. [16]

    Spin-dependent macroscopic forces from new particle exchange,

    B. A. Dobrescu and I. Mocioiu, “Spin-dependent macroscopic forces from new particle exchange,”JHEP11(2006) 005,arXiv:hep-ph/0605342

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  17. [17]

    The Dark Photon,

    M. Fabbrichesi, E. Gabrielli, and G. Lanfranchi, “The Dark Photon,”arXiv:2005.01515 [hep-ph]. 28

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  18. [18]

    The String Theory Photoverse,

    T. Coudarchet, A. Hebecker, J. Jaeckel, and J. Steiner, “The String Theory Photoverse,” arXiv:2510.12874 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  19. [19]

    Cavendish,Electrical Researches of Henry Cavendish, pp

    H. Cavendish,Electrical Researches of Henry Cavendish, pp. 104–112. Cambridge Library Collection - Physical Sciences. Cambridge University Press, 2010

    2010

  20. [20]

    Limits on an electromagnetic fifth force,

    D. F. Bartlett and S. L¨ ogl, “Limits on an electromagnetic fifth force,”Phys. Rev. Lett.61 (Nov, 1988) 2285–2287.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2285

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.61.2285 1988

  21. [21]

    G. D. Cochran,A new experimental test of Coulomb’s law of force between charges. University of Michigan, 1967

    1967

  22. [22]

    Experimental test of coulomb’s law,

    D. Bartlett, P. Goldhagen, and E. Phillips, “Experimental test of coulomb’s law,” Physical Review D2no. 3, (1970) 483

    1970

  23. [23]

    New experimental test of coulomb’s law: A laboratory upper limit on the photon rest mass,

    E. R. Williams, J. E. Faller, and H. A. Hill, “New experimental test of coulomb’s law: A laboratory upper limit on the photon rest mass,”Phys. Rev. Lett.26(Mar, 1971) 721–724.https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.26.721

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.26.721 1971

  24. [24]

    New alps results on hidden-sector lightweights,

    K. Ehret, M. Frede, S. Ghazaryan, M. Hildebrandt, E.-A. Knabbe, D. Kracht, A. Lindner, J. List, T. Meier, N. Meyer,et al., “New alps results on hidden-sector lightweights,”Physics Letters B689no. 4-5, (2010) 149–155

    2010

  25. [25]

    Deviations from electrodynamics: sun and laser,

    V. Popov and O. Vasil’Ev, “Deviations from electrodynamics: sun and laser,” Europhysics Letters15no. 1, (1991) 7

    1991

  26. [26]

    On the experimental search for photon mixing,

    V. Popov, “On the experimental search for photon mixing,”Turk. J. Phys.123(1999) 943

    1999

  27. [27]

    Helioscope bounds on hidden sector photons,

    J. Redondo, “Helioscope bounds on hidden sector photons,”Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2008no. 07, (2008) 008

    2008

  28. [28]

    Solar constraints on hidden photons re-visited,

    J. Redondo and G. Raffelt, “Solar constraints on hidden photons re-visited,”Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2013no. 08, (2013) 034

    2013

  29. [29]

    New stellar constraints on dark photons,

    H. An, M. Pospelov, and J. Pradler, “New stellar constraints on dark photons,”Physics Letters B725no. 4-5, (2013) 190–195

    2013

  30. [30]

    Massive hidden photons as lukewarm dark matter,

    J. Redondo and M. Postma, “Massive hidden photons as lukewarm dark matter,”Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2009no. 02, (2009) 005

    2009

  31. [31]

    Extra spacetime dimensions and unification,

    K. R. Dienes, E. Dudas, and T. Gherghetta, “Extra spacetime dimensions and unification,”Physics Letters B436no. 1–2, (Sept., 1998) 55–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0370-2693(98)00977-0

    work page doi:10.1016/s0370-2693(98)00977-0 1998

  32. [32]

    Low-Energy Probes of a Warped Extra Dimension,

    K. L. McDonald and D. E. Morrissey, “Low-Energy Probes of a Warped Extra Dimension,”JHEP05(2010) 056,arXiv:1002.3361 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  33. [33]

    Low-Energy Signals from Kinetic Mixing with a Warped Abelian Hidden Sector,

    K. L. McDonald and D. E. Morrissey, “Low-Energy Signals from Kinetic Mixing with a Warped Abelian Hidden Sector,”JHEP02(2011) 087,arXiv:1010.5999 [hep-ph]. 29

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2011

  34. [34]

    Hidden photons with Kaluza-Klein towers,

    J. Jaeckel, S. Roy, and C. J. Wallace, “Hidden photons with Kaluza-Klein towers,” arXiv:1408.0019 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv

  35. [35]

    Kinetic mixing, dark photons and an extra dimension. Part I,

    T. G. Rizzo, “Kinetic mixing, dark photons and an extra dimension. Part I,”JHEP07 (2018) 118,arXiv:1801.08525 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  36. [36]

    Multiple Axions in Laboratory Experiments,

    A. de Giorgi, J. Jaeckel, S. Monath, and V. Takhistov, “Multiple Axions in Laboratory Experiments,”arXiv:2512.16837 [hep-ph]

    arXiv

  37. [37]

    Arion↔Photon Oscillations in a Steady Magnetic Field. (In Russian),

    A. A. Anselm, “Arion↔Photon Oscillations in a Steady Magnetic Field. (In Russian),” Yad. Fiz.42(1985) 1480–1483

    1985

  38. [38]

    Proposed experiment to produce and detect light pseudoscalars,

    K. Van Bibber, N. R. Dagdeviren, S. E. Koonin, A. Kerman, and H. N. Nelson, “Proposed experiment to produce and detect light pseudoscalars,”Phys. Rev. Lett.59 (1987) 759–762

    1987

  39. [39]

    Experimental Test for Arion<—>Photon Oscillations in a Homogeneous Constant Magnetic Field,

    A. A. Anselm, “Experimental Test for Arion<—>Photon Oscillations in a Homogeneous Constant Magnetic Field,”Phys. Rev. D37(1988) 2001. [40]ALPS IICollaboration, D. C. Brothertonet al., “Any Light Particle Searches with ALPS II: first science results,”arXiv:2512.14110 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1988

  40. [40]

    The Low-Energy Frontier of Particle Physics,

    J. Jaeckel and A. Ringwald, “The Low-Energy Frontier of Particle Physics,”Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.60(2010) 405–437,arXiv:1002.0329 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  41. [41]

    Light shining through walls,

    J. Redondo and A. Ringwald, “Light shining through walls,”Contemporary Physics52 no. 3, (May, 2011) 211–236.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00107514.2011.563516

    work page doi:10.1080/00107514.2011.563516 2011

  42. [42]

    Light from the hidden sector,

    M. Ahlers, H. Gies, J. Jaeckel, J. Redondo, and A. Ringwald, “Light from the hidden sector,”Phys. Rev. D76(2007) 115005,arXiv:0706.2836 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  43. [43]

    Experimental Searches for the Axion and Axion-Like Particles,

    P. W. Graham, I. G. Irastorza, S. K. Lamoreaux, A. Lindner, and K. A. van Bibber, “Experimental Searches for the Axion and Axion-Like Particles,”Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci.65(2015) 485–514,arXiv:1602.00039 [hep-ex]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  44. [44]

    New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles,

    I. G. Irastorza and J. Redondo, “New experimental approaches in the search for axion-like particles,”Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys.102(2018) 89–159,arXiv:1801.08127 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  45. [45]

    G. G. Raffelt,Stars as Laboratories for Fundamental Physics: The Astrophysics of Neutrinos, Axions, and Other Weakly Interacting Particles. University Of Chicago Press, 1996

    1996

  46. [46]

    Neutrino mass anarchy,

    L. Hall, H. Murayama, and N. Weiner, “Neutrino mass anarchy,”Physical Review Letters 84no. 12, (Mar., 2000) 2572–2575. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2572

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevlett.84.2572 2000

  47. [47]

    ALP anarchy,

    F. Chadha-Day, J. Maxwell, and J. Turner, “ALP anarchy,”JCAP09(2024) 056, arXiv:2311.13658 [hep-ph]

    arXiv 2024

  48. [48]

    Axion-like particle oscillations,

    F. Chadha-Day, “Axion-like particle oscillations,”JCAP01no. 01, (2022) 013, arXiv:2107.12813 [hep-ph]. 30

    arXiv 2022

  49. [49]

    String Axiverse,

    A. Arvanitaki, S. Dimopoulos, S. Dubovsky, N. Kaloper, and J. March-Russell, “String Axiverse,”Phys. Rev. D81(2010) 123530,arXiv:0905.4720 [hep-th]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  50. [50]

    Invisible axions and large radius compactifications,

    K. R. Dienes, E. Dudas, and T. Gherghetta, “Invisible axions and large radius compactifications,”Phys. Rev. D62(2000) 105023,arXiv:hep-ph/9912455

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  51. [51]

    Compatibility of CAST search with axion-like interpretation of PVLAS results,

    E. Masso and J. Redondo, “Compatibility of CAST search with axion-like interpretation of PVLAS results,”Phys. Rev. Lett.97(2006) 151802,arXiv:hep-ph/0606163

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  52. [52]

    Mixing of the Photon with Low Mass Particles,

    G. Raffelt and L. Stodolsky, “Mixing of the Photon with Low Mass Particles,”Phys. Rev. D37(1988) 1237

    1988

  53. [53]

    Tunneling of the 3rd kind,

    H. Gies and J. Jaeckel, “Tunneling of the 3rd kind,”JHEP08(2009) 063, arXiv:0904.0609 [hep-ph]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  54. [54]

    Simple rules for discontinuities in finite-temperature field theory,

    H. A. Weldon, “Simple rules for discontinuities in finite-temperature field theory,”Phys. Rev. D28(Oct, 1983) 2007–2015. https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevD.28.2007

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevd.28.2007 1983

  55. [55]

    Neutrino energy loss from the plasma process at all temperatures and densities,

    E. Braaten and D. Segel, “Neutrino energy loss from the plasma process at all temperatures and densities,”Physical Review D48no. 4, (1993) 1478

    1993

  56. [56]

    New Solar Composition: The Problem With Solar Models Revisited,

    A. Serenelli, S. Basu, J. W. Ferguson, and M. Asplund, “New Solar Composition: The Problem With Solar Models Revisited,”Astrophys. J. Lett.705(2009) L123–L127, arXiv:0909.2668 [astro-ph.SR]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  57. [57]

    Zacks,Examples and Problems in Mathematical Statistics

    S. Zacks,Examples and Problems in Mathematical Statistics. John Wiley & Sons, 2013

    2013

  58. [58]

    On the spectrum of random matrices,

    L. A. Pastur, “On the spectrum of random matrices,”Teoreticheskaya i Matematicheskaya Fizika10no. 1, (1972) 102–112

    1972

  59. [59]

    On the distribution of the roots of certain symmetric matrices,

    E. P. Wigner, “On the distribution of the roots of certain symmetric matrices,”Annals of Mathematics67no. 2, (1958) 325–327

    1958

  60. [60]

    Random matrices: Universality of local eigenvalue statistics,

    T. Tao and V. Vu, “Random matrices: Universality of local eigenvalue statistics,” 2010. https://arxiv.org/abs/0906.0510. 31

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010