REVIEW 4 cited by
Object-aware Inversion and Reassembly for Image Editing
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
By comparing the original and target prompts, we can obtain numerous editing pairs, each comprising an object and its corresponding editing target. To allow editability while maintaining fidelity to the input image, existing editing methods typically involve a fixed number of inversion steps that project the whole input image to its noisier latent representation, followed by a denoising process guided by the target prompt. However, we find that the optimal number of inversion steps for achieving ideal editing results varies significantly among different editing pairs, owing to varying editing difficulties. Therefore, the current literature, which relies on a fixed number of inversion steps, produces sub-optimal generation quality, especially when handling multiple editing pairs in a natural image. To this end, we propose a new image editing paradigm, dubbed Object-aware Inversion and Reassembly (OIR), to enable object-level fine-grained editing. Specifically, we design a new search metric, which determines the optimal inversion steps for each editing pair, by jointly considering the editability of the target and the fidelity of the non-editing region. We use our search metric to find the optimal inversion step for each editing pair when editing an image. We then edit these editing pairs separately to avoid concept mismatch. Subsequently, we propose an additional reassembly step to seamlessly integrate the respective editing results and the non-editing region to obtain the final edited image. To systematically evaluate the effectiveness of our method, we collect two datasets called OIRBench for benchmarking single- and multi-object editing, respectively. Experiments demonstrate that our method achieves superior performance in editing object shapes, colors, materials, categories, etc., especially in multi-object editing scenarios.
Forward citations
Cited by 4 Pith papers
-
DNAEdit: Direct Noise Alignment for Text-Guided Rectified Flow Editing
Direct Noise Alignment iteratively moves a random Gaussian noise until the model's predicted velocity matches the straight-line velocity to the image, reducing inversion drift and giving the best reported fidelity-edi...
-
ComplexBench-Edit: Benchmarking Complex Instruction-Driven Image Editing via Compositional Dependencies
Introduces a benchmark for chain-dependent image editing instructions plus a region-aware consistency metric, and shows a chain-of-thought prompt improves a Gemini-based editor.
-
Towards Efficient Exemplar Based Image Editing with Multimodal VLMs
ReEdit transfers exemplar-based edits to new images by conditioning Stable Diffusion on a LLaVA-written caption plus a CLIP edit-direction vector, with no per-example optimization.
-
Instructing Text-to-Image Diffusion Models via Classifier-Guided Semantic Optimization
CASO learns per-attribute continuous embeddings via classifier gradients, steering Stable Diffusion for text-free, disentangled image editing.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.