Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

How Does Quantization Affect Multilingual LLMs?

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2407.03211 v2 pith:VC25QYOI submitted 2024-07-03 cs.CL cs.LG

classification cs.CLcs.LG
keywords quantizationlanguagesacrossautomaticevaluationhumanllmsmodels
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Quantization techniques are widely used to improve inference speed and deployment of large language models. While a wide body of work examines the impact of quantization on LLMs in English, none have evaluated across languages. We conduct a thorough analysis of quantized multilingual LLMs, focusing on performance across languages and at varying scales. We use automatic benchmarks, LLM-as-a-Judge, and human evaluation, finding that (1) harmful effects of quantization are apparent in human evaluation, which automatic metrics severely underestimate: a 1.7% average drop in Japanese across automatic tasks corresponds to a 16.0% drop reported by human evaluators on realistic prompts; (2) languages are disparately affected by quantization, with non-Latin script languages impacted worst; and (3) challenging tasks like mathematical reasoning degrade fastest. As the ability to serve low-compute models is critical for wide global adoption of NLP technologies, our results urge consideration of multilingual performance as a key evaluation criterion for efficient models.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Huff-LLM: End-to-End Lossless Compression for Efficient LLM Inference

    cs.LG 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Huff-LLM splits FP16/BF16 LLM weights into small bit groups, Huffman-compresses each group, and uses custom hardware decoders so weights stay compressed through the memory hierarchy during inference.

  2. Quantized Large Language Models in Biomedical Natural Language Processing: Evaluation and Recommendation

    cs.CL 2025-09 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Quantizing LLMs to 4 or 8 bits cuts GPU memory by up to 75% with generally small performance changes across eight biomedical NLP benchmarks.

  3. LPASS: Linear Probes as Stepping Stones for vulnerability detection using compressed LLMs

    cs.CR 2025-05 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Linear probe accuracy on simple code metrics can guide layer pruning and roughly predict post-fine-tuning vulnerability detection performance, but several headline numbers in the abstract do not match the paper's own tables.

Pith tools