Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 6 minor 82 references

New opportunities for high pressure hydrogen achieved by fullerane vibrating modes: an ab initio study

T0 review · 4 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A vibrating C20H20 cage compresses six trapped hydrogen atoms to 400–500 GPa, taking them through known high-pressure hydrogen phases including a metallic liquid analogue.

desk verdict Creative but unsupported: the cage-breathing idea is fresh, but Eq. 7's pressure is not a thermodynamic pressure, and every phase label rides on it. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.06441 v1 pith:VDBS7TFN submitted 2025-02-10 cond-mat.mtrl-sci physics.atm-clus

Leonard Constantin Gebac , Vasile Bercu This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.mtrl-sciphysics.atm-clus
keywords highpressurehydrogendynamicsencapsulationradialsymmetricvibrationfulleraneabinitiomoleculardodecahedranemetallicpressure-inducedphases
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper argues that a C20H20 dodecahedrane cage, set into its radial breathing vibration, acts as a miniature piston on the six hydrogen atoms trapped inside it. In first-principles molecular dynamics simulations, each compression of the cage drives the hydrogen cluster to peak pressures of 400–500 GPa and temperatures up to roughly 2500 K. At those compression peaks the system is identified as a metallic liquid analogue of hydrogen, and across the 0.5 ps trajectory it also visits the molecular liquid phase and solid phases I, II, IV, V, and VI. If this assignment is right, the cage is a controllable, molecule-sized pressure source, and the paper proposes that exciting such cage vibrations could become an experimental route toward metallic hydrogen.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the radial breathing mode of the C20H20 dodecahedrane, the symmetric expansion and contraction in which all carbon atoms move toward and away from the center together. The cage is initialized expanded by a factor of 1.2 and then relaxes, so this mode drives repeated compression cycles. The paper converts the hydrogen cluster's energy and volume changes into a pressure via Equation 7, $P[i] = -\frac{Q_{H_6}[i]+K_{H_6}[i]-Q^0_{H_6}}{V_{H_6}[i]-V^0_{H_6}}$, referencing an intermediate optimized configuration, and assigns each time step to a hydrogen phase by comparing that pressure and the kinetic-energy temperature with literature P–T windows. The mechanism also links the cage radius minima to H–H distance collapse, volume-ratio changes, and a HOMO–LUMO gap narrowing of roughly 2.5 eV, and that correlation is what carries the phase assignments.

What would settle it

Recompute the pressure on the H6 cluster at peak compression using the full quantum stress tensor, including H6–C20H20 forces; if the peak falls well below 400 GPa, or if the H–H distances do not approach 0.81 Å at the compression minima, the phase assignments and the metallic-liquid claim would not survive.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Starting the cage at 1.2 times its equilibrium size and letting it evolve in the microcanonical ensemble excites its radial symmetric breathing mode: the cage radius oscillates, and every minimum of the cage radius coincides with a pressure peak of 400–500 GPa on the enclosed H6 cluster. At these peaks the average H–H distances shrink, the HOMO–LUMO gap of the whole complex narrows from about 9.5 eV to about 7 eV, and the cluster is classified as a metallic liquid analogue. Over the simulated 500 fs the system also registers molecular liquid and solid phases I, II, IV, V, and VI, with the phase IV analogue showing an average H–H distance of 0.810 Å, close to the experimentally reported 0.82 Å. The authors' central claim is that the radial breathing mode of a fullerane cage is sufficient, in principle, to create inside a single molecule the extreme pressures and temperatures that normally require a diamond anvil cell.

Load-bearing premise

The whole result rests on treating six hydrogen atoms as if their own energy and volume changes define a true pressure, while the interaction of the hydrogens with the cage is left out of that pressure.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The radial breathing vibration of a C20H20 cage can transiently impose pressures of hundreds of gigapascals on a handful of trapped hydrogen atoms, without any external pressure apparatus.
  • A single 0.5 ps trajectory of H6@C20H20 crosses the P–T domains assigned to molecular liquid, metallic liquid, and solid phases I, II, IV, V, and VI, so the cage can act as a compact survey instrument for high-pressure hydrogen phase behavior.
  • The phase IV analogue H–H distance of 0.810 Å matches the experimentally suggested 0.82 Å, which the authors take as evidence that the cage reproduces real high-pressure hydrogen structures.
  • Because pressures and temperatures arise dynamically from the cage vibration rather than being imposed as thermodynamic parameters, the mechanism suggests an experimental route to dense hydrogen that could lead to metallic hydrogen.
  • The HOMO–LUMO gap narrowing during compression is analogous to the measured pressure-driven closure of hydrogen's band gap, giving an electronic-structure observable tied to cage breathing.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the same breathing-mode mechanism scales, larger cages such as C60 or carbon nanotubes filled with more hydrogen could push past the metallic liquid into the metallic solid regime above roughly 500 GPa.
  • A direct numerical test of the central number is to recompute the H6 pressure from the full stress tensor including the H6–C20H20 interaction energy that Equation 7 omits; if that term is not negligible, the 400–500 GPa peaks would shift.
  • The predicted gap narrowing implies a testable optical signature: time-resolved absorption of an ensemble of vibrationally excited dodecahedrane cages should oscillate with the breathing period.
  • Varying the initial cage expansion factor and the deposited kinetic energy would map a two-dimensional P–T region, turning the cage into a programmable nanoscale phase diagram explorer.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports Born-Oppenheimer AIMD simulations (NVE, 500 fs, rCAM-B3LYP/aug-pcseg-1) of six hydrogen atoms encapsulated in a C20H20 dodecahedrane cage, started from a cage expanded by 20%. The authors track the cage radius, the H6 volume and shape, the HOMO-LUMO gap of the full H6@C20H20 system, and a pressure and temperature assigned to the H6 subsystem via Eqs. (7) and (8). They report pressure peaks of 400-500 GPa correlated with cage compressions, temperatures up to about 2500 K, and use these P,T values to label instantaneous configurations as analogues of molecular liquid, metallic liquid, and solid phases I-VI of bulk hydrogen, including a 'metallic liquid analogue' state. The paper proposes the radial breathing mode of fullerane cages as a new experimental route to dense and possibly metallic hydrogen.

Significance. If the pressure estimate were correct, the demonstration that a molecular cage's breathing mode can transiently compress an encapsulated H6 cluster to hundreds of GPa would be a conceptually novel route to dense hydrogen and would be relevant to metallic hydrogen research. The paper is also commendable for making input files and results available, which aids reproducibility. However, the central pressure calculation is not a mechanical or thermodynamic pressure, and the phase assignments rest entirely on it. The full-system HOMO-LUMO gap narrowing to about 7 eV does not provide independent evidence of metallicity. As submitted, the quantitative claims about GPa pressures and metallic-liquid conditions are unsupported, so the paper's significance for high-pressure hydrogen is not established.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.3, Eq. (7)] The pressure is computed from the H6 internal energy and kinetic energy only, omitting the interaction term U_H6-C20H20 that the authors themselves introduce in Eq. (5). In the NVE trajectory, a change in QH6+KH6 is not the work done on the H6 subsystem; energy is exchanged through U_H6-C20H20 and through the cage's own kinetic and potential energy. Thus the quotient in Eq. (7) is not the pressure exerted by the cage on the hydrogen atoms. In addition, VH6 is a geometric tetrahedral volume of six point particles in vacuum, not a thermodynamic volume, so the thermodynamic relation P = -dU/dV in Eq. (6) has no well-defined meaning for this subsystem. The 400-500 GPa peaks and the >100 GPa floor in Fig. 1 therefore have no established physical basis.
  2. [Section 3, Table 1 and Fig. 4] All phase assignments are made by matching the computed P and T values to literature ranges for bulk hydrogen. Because the pressure values from Eq. (7) are unsupported, the claimed traversal of molecular liquid, metallic liquid, and solid phases I-VI is unsupported. Moreover, 'solid phase I/II/IV/V/VI' are bulk crystalline phases with specific periodic structures; a six-atom cluster in vacuum cannot realize these phases, and calling them 'analogues' does not supply the missing structural criterion. The phase labels should either be removed or replaced by a direct description of the cluster geometry without reference to the bulk phase diagram.
  3. [Section 3, Figs. 3 and 4] The 'metallic liquid analogue' label is inferred from the P,T matching, not from any direct electronic-structure evidence for the H6 subsystem. The only computed electronic observable, the HOMO-LUMO gap of the entire H6@C20H20 system, narrows to about 7 eV during compression (Fig. 3), which is far from a metallic gap. A 7 eV gap in the full system does not indicate that the enclosed hydrogen becomes metallic, and it is dominated by the cage. A metallic claim would require, for example, the density of states or Kohn-Sham gap of the H6 subsystem under the confining potential.
  4. [Section 2.3, reference state in Eq. (7)] The reference values Q0_H6 and V0_H6 are taken at a hand-picked 'intermediate configuration' chosen after the fact; different choices shift the baseline of the finite-difference quotient in Eq. (7) and consequently change the pressure scale and the resulting phase assignments. The paper does not quantify this sensitivity, so even within the authors' finite-difference approach the numerical pressures in Table 2 are not robust. This is a load-bearing issue, not a presentation issue.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sections 1 and 2.3] There are typographical errors: 'it's stability' in Section 1 and 'it's kinetic energy' in Section 2.3 should be corrected to 'its'.
  2. [Figure 1 and Section 3] The text states that only half of the 0.5 ps trajectory is shown; please state which half is displayed and why, and make the full trajectory available in the repository.
  3. [Table 2] The '± −' entries for phases II and VI should be replaced with 'n/a' and a sentence should explain that these phases are each represented by a single time step.
  4. [Section 3, phase IV*] The selection of 7 of 12 phase-IV points as 'IV*' on the basis of consistent volumes and volume ratios should be described as an explicit criterion defined before the averages are computed; otherwise the small standard deviations in the IV* row do not constitute a meaningful validation.
  5. [Section 2.2] The manuscript should explain how the subsystem energies QH6 and QC20H20 are extracted from the combined H6@C20H20 DFT calculation; without a fragmentation or projection scheme, the partition is not unique and it directly affects the pressure computed in Eq. (7).
  6. [Reference [76]] The data availability statement should include a DOI or permanent repository link rather than a general 'available online' statement.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Pressure scale is calibrated to an internal reference state, so the 400–500 GPa peaks and phase assignments built on them are partly self-referential.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 2.3, Eq. (7); used in Section 3 (Figs. 1 and 4, Table 2)]
    "Numerically, the pressure is computed as the negative ratio of the variation of the internal energy of the system of interest and the variation of its volume. In our case, the internal energy is identical to the sum between the total potential energy of the system, QH6 [i], and it’s kinetic energy, KH6 [i], calculated at each time step i. Thus, at each time step: P [i] = − QH6 [i] + KH6 [i] − Q0 H6 VH6 [i] − V 0 H6 ... In order to be able to apply Equation 7, an intermediate configuration was selected from which variations in the total system energy were negligible (approximately 0.01 %)."

    The pressure presented as the cage-induced pressure on H6 is not obtained from a mechanical stress calculation or from an external equation of state; it is defined by Eq. 7 using Q0_H6 and V0_H6 chosen from an intermediate configuration inside the same NVE trajectory. This makes P[i] a finite-difference quotient normalized to an internally selected reference point, not an independently measurable observable. All subsequent headline results—'pressures ... reaching between 400 and 500 GPa', the P-T phase labels in Table 2 (metallic liquid analogue, phases I–VI), and the claimed traversal of metallic-hydrogen conditions—are read off from this internally calibrated P.

full rationale

The core AIMD simulation is not circular: the NVE trajectory of H6@C20H20, the geometric observables (RC20, RH6, VH6), the HOMO-LUMO evolution, and the temperature from kinetic energy are all computed from first principles and are independent of the paper's conclusions. The self-citations (refs. 52–53 and 76) are background stability claims and a data-availability link; they are not load-bearing. The one genuinely self-referential element is the pressure definition in Eq. 7, where the reference values Q0_H6 and V0_H6 are taken from an intermediate configuration of the very trajectory being analyzed. Because the phase assignments in Table 2 and the metallic-liquid/metallic-hydrogen conclusions are obtained by comparing this internally calibrated P with literature P-T boxes, those conclusions inherit the arbitrariness of the reference-state choice. This is not a case where the whole derivation collapses to its input, but it is a fitted-input-called-prediction pattern for the central pressure claim, warranting a score of 4 rather than a clean bill.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on several unverified modeling choices rather than on fitting: the initial cage expansion k=1.2, the reference energy/volume state used in the pressure formula, the equation of state for the H6 subsystem that ignores cage interaction, and the mapping of a six-atom cluster onto bulk hydrogen phase boundaries. These are listed explicitly because each is load-bearing for the reported pressure and phase results.

free parameters (3)
  • initial cage expansion factor k = 1.2
    The C20H20 cage is initialized at 1.2 times equilibrium dimensions (Methods) to induce compression; the value is chosen by hand and sets the amplitude of the radial breathing mode that generates the high pressures.
  • reference pressure state (Q0_H6, V0_H6) = not reported numerically; selected at an intermediate configuration where total energy variation is approximately 0.01%
    Eq. 7 defines pressure from energy and volume differences relative to this hand-picked reference state; the resulting pressure values depend on this choice.
  • phase-IV* selection filter = 7 of 12 phase-IV points retained
    Only phase-IV points with 'consistent numerical values' of volume and volume ratio are kept for the phase-IV* H-H distance analysis, a post hoc choice that affects the reported 0.810 +/- 0.007 angstrom comparison.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Bulk high-pressure hydrogen P-T phase boundaries from Table 1 apply to a six-atom H6 cluster inside C20H20.
    Used throughout Section 3 to assign phases to the trajectory; the table is for extended bulk hydrogen, not nanoconfined clusters.
  • ad hoc to paper Thermodynamic pressure can be computed from finite differences of H6 internal energy and volume alone (Eq. 7), with no cage-H6 interaction term.
    Introduced in Section 2.3; this is the paper's own definition and is not justified by a virial expression or free-energy derivative.
  • domain assumption Classical equipartition temperature from six hydrogen atoms is physically meaningful.
    Eq. 8 uses average kinetic energy of six atoms to compute T; quantum and finite-size effects are not addressed.
  • domain assumption rCAM-B3LYP/aug-pcseg-1 accurately describes compressed hydrogen and charge transfer in this system.
    Chosen based on refs 71-74; no benchmark against QMC/PIMD or other functionals is given for this system.
  • domain assumption A single NVE trajectory with zero initial velocities and a 1.2x expanded cage is a representative physical pathway.
    No equilibration or ensemble sampling is performed, so all results are conditional on this initial state.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of New opportunities for high pressure hydrogen achieved by fullerane vibrating modes: an ab initio study." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VDBS7TFN

@misc{pith2026250206441,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: New opportunities for high pressure hydrogen achieved by fullerane vibrating modes: an ab initio study},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VDBS7TFN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.06441}
}
read the original abstract

The encapsulation of hydrogen within fullerene/fullerane cages offers a promising avenue for studying high pressure hydrogen dynamics. Through ab initio molecular dynamics simulations, we investigate the behavior of a system consisting of hydrogen atoms enclosed in a \ch{C20H20} dodecahedrane. Our findings reveal significant structural and dynamical changes as the cage undergoes compression, corresponding to radial symmetric vibration. We analyze geometric, energetic, and thermodynamic parameters, highlighting correlations and observing behavior analogous to high pressure phases of hydrogen. Notably, our study bridges the gap between theory and experiment by proposing a novel approach to achieving high pressures and temperatures experimentally. These results not only contribute to the understanding of hydrogen behavior under extreme conditions but also hold implications for the quest to attain metallic hydrogen - a milestone in materials science with potential applications in various fields.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.06441 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Top: Evolution of the cage radius, RC20 (red) and RH20 (blue). Bottom: Evolution of the pressure experienced by the H6 system (red) and the temperature (blue). Certain areas are colored to highlight correlations between the physical quantities. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Evolution of the volume determined by the 6 hydrogen atoms (red) and the ratio between this volume and the equivalent volume of a sphere with a radius equal to the average distance between the center of mass and the 6 hydrogen atoms (blue). Certain areas are colored to highlight correlations between the analyzed and represented physical quantities. In [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Top: Evolution of HOMO (red) and LUMO (blue) energy levels. Bottom: Evolution of the average distance between the center of mass and the 6 hydrogen atoms, RH6 (red), and the difference between the two energy levels LUMO - HOMO (blue). Certain areas are colored to highlight correlations between the analyzed and represented physical quantities. Among the 1000 analyzed data points, only 12 align with phase IV as per th… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: H6 system evolution across different analogues phases (red) and the dodecahedrane radius (blue) as a function of time. in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

82 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    The interiors of giant planets: Models and outstanding questions

    Tristan Guillot. The interiors of giant planets: Models and outstanding questions. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. , 33:493–530, 2005

    2005

  2. [2]

    Vitaly L Ginzburg. What problems of physics and astrophysics seem now to be especially important and interesting (thirty years later, already on the verge of the 21st century)? The Physics of a Lifetime: Reflections on the Problems and Personalities of 20th Century Physics , pages 149–197, 2001

    2001

  3. [3]

    H. K. Mao and P. M. Bell. Observations of hydrogen at room temperature (25 °c) and high pressure (to 500 kilobars). Science, 203(4384):1004–1006, 1979

    work page 1979

  4. [4]

    Howie, and Ho- Kwang Mao

    Eugene Gregoryanz, Cheng Ji, Philip Dalladay-Simpson, Bing Li, Ross T. Howie, and Ho- Kwang Mao. Everything you always wanted to know about metallic hydrogen but were afraid to ask. Matter and Radiation at Extremes , 5(3):038101, 04 2020

    work page 2020

  5. [5]

    High- pressure behavior of hydrogen and deuterium at low temperatures

    Xiao-Di Liu, Ross T Howie, Hui-Chao Zhang, Xiao-Jia Chen, and Eugene Gregoryanz. High- pressure behavior of hydrogen and deuterium at low temperatures. Physical review letters , 119(6):065301, 2017

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    New low-temperature phase of molecular deuterium at ultrahigh pressure

    Isaac F Silvera and Rinke J Wijngaarden. New low-temperature phase of molecular deuterium at ultrahigh pressure. Physical Review Letters, 47(1):39, 1981

    work page 1981

  7. [7]

    Phase transition in solid molecular hydrogen at ultrahigh pressures

    Russel J Hemley and HK Mao. Phase transition in solid molecular hydrogen at ultrahigh pressures. Physical review letters , 61(7):857, 1988

    work page 1988

  8. [8]

    Proton tunneling in phase iv of hydrogen and deuterium

    Ross T Howie, Thomas Scheler, Christophe L Guillaume, and Eugene Gregoryanz. Proton tunneling in phase iv of hydrogen and deuterium. Physical Review B , 86(21):214104, 2012. 13

    work page 2012

Show all 82 references
  1. [9]

    Mixed molecular and atomic phase of dense hydrogen

    Ross T Howie, Christophe L Guillaume, Thomas Scheler, Alexander F Goncharov, and Eugene Gregoryanz. Mixed molecular and atomic phase of dense hydrogen. Physical Review Letters , 108(12):125501, 2012

    2012

  2. [10]

    Semimetallic molecular hydrogen at pressure above 350 gpa

    Mikhail I Eremets, Alexander P Drozdov, PP Kong, and Hongbo Wang. Semimetallic molecular hydrogen at pressure above 350 gpa. Nature Physics, 15(12):1246–1249, 2019

    2019

  3. [11]

    Ultrahigh-pressure isostructural electronic transitions in hydrogen

    Cheng Ji, Bing Li, Wenjun Liu, Jesse S Smith, Arnab Majumdar, Wei Luo, Rajeev Ahuja, Jinfu Shu, Junyue Wang, Stanislav Sinogeikin, et al. Ultrahigh-pressure isostructural electronic transitions in hydrogen. Nature, 573(7775):558–562, 2019

    2019

  4. [12]

    Evidence from x-ray diffraction of orientational ordering in phase iii of solid hydrogen at pressures up to 183 gpa

    Yuichi Akahama, Manabu Nishimura, Haruki Kawamura, Naohisa Hirao, Yasuo Ohishi, and Kenichi Takemura. Evidence from x-ray diffraction of orientational ordering in phase iii of solid hydrogen at pressures up to 183 gpa. Physical Review B , 82(6):060101, 2010

    2010

  5. [13]

    Novel infrared vibron absorption in solid hydrogen at megabar pressures

    Michael Hanfland, Russell J Hemley, and Ho-kwang Mao. Novel infrared vibron absorption in solid hydrogen at megabar pressures. Physical review letters , 70(24):3760, 1993

    1993

  6. [14]

    Structure of phase iii of solid hydrogen

    Chris J Pickard and Richard J Needs. Structure of phase iii of solid hydrogen. Nature Physics, 3(7):473–476, 2007

    2007

  7. [15]

    Evidence for a new phase of dense hydrogen above 325 gigapascals

    Philip Dalladay-Simpson, Ross T Howie, and Eugene Gregoryanz. Evidence for a new phase of dense hydrogen above 325 gigapascals. Nature, 529(7584):63–67, 2016

    2016

  8. [16]

    Synchrotron infrared spectroscopic evidence of the probable transition to metal hydrogen

    Paul Loubeyre, Florent Occelli, and Paul Dumas. Synchrotron infrared spectroscopic evidence of the probable transition to metal hydrogen. Nature, 577(7792):631–635, 2020

    2020

  9. [17]

    Quantum phase diagram of high-pressure hydrogen

    Lorenzo Monacelli, Michele Casula, Kousuke Nakano, Sandro Sorella, and Francesco Mauri. Quantum phase diagram of high-pressure hydrogen. Nature Physics, 19(6):845–850, 2023

    2023

  10. [18]

    Observation of the wigner-huntington transition to metallic hydrogen

    Ranga P Dias and Isaac F Silvera. Observation of the wigner-huntington transition to metallic hydrogen. Science, 355(6326):715–718, 2017

    2017

  11. [19]

    Strong electron-phonon and band structure effects in the optical properties of high pressure metallic hydrogen

    Miguel Borinaga, Julen Iba˜ nez-Azpiroz, Aitor Bergara, and Ion Errea. Strong electron-phonon and band structure effects in the optical properties of high pressure metallic hydrogen. Physical review letters, 120(5):057402, 2018

    2018

  12. [20]

    observation of the wigner- huntington transition to metallic hydrogen

    Alexander F Goncharov and Viktor V Struzhkin. Comment on “observation of the wigner- huntington transition to metallic hydrogen”. Science, 357(6353):eaam9736, 2017

    2017

  13. [21]

    observation of the wigner- huntington transition to metallic hydrogen

    Isaac F Silvera and Ranga Dias. Response to comment on “observation of the wigner- huntington transition to metallic hydrogen”. Science, 357(6353):eaan2671, 2017

    2017

  14. [22]

    Hua Y. Geng. Public debate on metallic hydrogen to boost high pressure research. Matter and Radiation at Extremes , 2(6):275–277, 10 2017

    2017

  15. [23]

    Isaac Tamblyn and Stanimir A. Bonev. Structure and phase boundaries of compressed liquid hydrogen. Phys. Rev. Lett. , 104:065702, Feb 2010

    2010

  16. [24]

    Metallic hydrogen

    Isaac F Silvera, Ranga Dias, Ori Noked, Ashkan Salamat, and Mohamed Zaghoo. Metallic hydrogen. Journal of Low Temperature Physics , 187:4–19, 2017. 14

    2017

  17. [25]

    M. A. Morales, C. Pierleoni, E. Schwegler, and D. M. Ceperley. Evidence for a first-order liquid-liquid transition in high-pressure hydrogen from ab initio simulations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , 107:12799–12803, 2010

    2010

  18. [26]

    Universal diamond edge raman scale to 0.5 terapascal and implications for the metallization of hydrogen

    MI Eremets, VS Minkov, PP Kong, AP Drozdov, S Chariton, and VB Prakapenka. Universal diamond edge raman scale to 0.5 terapascal and implications for the metallization of hydrogen. Nature Communications, 14(1):907, 2023

    2023

  19. [27]

    Stable phases of solid hydrogen at megabar pressures and at zero temperature

    Hitose Nagara and Tuto Nakamura. Stable phases of solid hydrogen at megabar pressures and at zero temperature. Physical review letters , 68(16):2468, 1992

    1992

  20. [28]

    Density functional theory study of phase iv of solid hydrogen

    Chris J Pickard, Miguel Martinez-Canales, and Richard J Needs. Density functional theory study of phase iv of solid hydrogen. Physical Review B , 85(21):214114, 2012

    2012

  21. [29]

    Hexagonal structure of phase iii of solid hydrogen

    Bartomeu Monserrat, Richard J Needs, Eugene Gregoryanz, and Chris J Pickard. Hexagonal structure of phase iii of solid hydrogen. Physical Review B , 94(13):134101, 2016

    2016

  22. [30]

    Structure and metallicity of phase v of hydrogen

    Bartomeu Monserrat, Neil D Drummond, Philip Dalladay-Simpson, Ross T Howie, Pablo L´ opez R ´ ıos, Eugene Gregoryanz, Chris J Pickard, and Richard J Needs. Structure and metallicity of phase v of hydrogen. Physical Review Letters, 120(25):255701, 2018

    2018

  23. [31]

    The role of van der waals and exchange interactions in high-pressure solid hydrogen

    Sam Azadi and Graeme J Ackland. The role of van der waals and exchange interactions in high-pressure solid hydrogen. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 19(32):21829–21839, 2017

    2017

  24. [32]

    Unconventional phase iii of high-pressure solid hydrogen

    Sam Azadi and Thomas D K¨ uhne. Unconventional phase iii of high-pressure solid hydrogen. Physical Review B , 100(15):155103, 2019

    2019

  25. [33]

    Fate of density functional theory in the study of high-pressure solid hydrogen

    Sam Azadi and WMC Foulkes. Fate of density functional theory in the study of high-pressure solid hydrogen. Physical Review B , 88(1):014115, 2013

    2013

  26. [34]

    First-principles study of solid hydrogen: Comparison among four exchange-correlation functionals

    Huan-Cheng Yang, Kai Liu, Zhong-Yi Lu, and Hai-Qing Lin. First-principles study of solid hydrogen: Comparison among four exchange-correlation functionals. Physical Review B , 102(17):174109, 2020

    2020

  27. [35]

    Anharmonicity and finite-temperature effects on the structure, stability, and vibrational spectrum of phase iii of solid molecular hydrogen

    Ranber Singh, Sam Azadi, and Thomas D K¨ uhne. Anharmonicity and finite-temperature effects on the structure, stability, and vibrational spectrum of phase iii of solid molecular hydrogen. Physical Review B , 90(1):014110, 2014

    2014

  28. [36]

    Proton or deuteron transfer in phase iv of solid hydrogen and deuterium

    Hanyu Liu and Yanming Ma. Proton or deuteron transfer in phase iv of solid hydrogen and deuterium. Physical review letters , 110(2):025903, 2013

    2013

  29. [37]

    Pressure-induced electronic and structural phase transitions in solid hydrogen

    BI Min, HJF Jansen, and AJ Freeman. Pressure-induced electronic and structural phase transitions in solid hydrogen. Physical Review B , 33(9):6383, 1986

    1986

  30. [38]

    Room-temperature structures of solid hydrogen at high pressures

    Hanyu Liu, Li Zhu, Wenwen Cui, and Yanming Ma. Room-temperature structures of solid hydrogen at high pressures. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 137(7):074501, 08 2012

    2012

  31. [39]

    Amorphous to amorphous phase transformation in boron-rich amorphous silicon borides: an ab initio study

    Ay¸ seg¨ ul¨Ozlem C ¸ etin Karacao˘ glan and Murat Durandurdu. Amorphous to amorphous phase transformation in boron-rich amorphous silicon borides: an ab initio study. High Pressure Research, 0(0):1–14, 2024. 15

    2024

  32. [40]

    Bouhemadou A

    A. Bouhemadou A. Bedjaoui and S. Bin-Omran. Structural, elastic and thermodynamic prop- erties of tetragonal and orthorhombic polymorphs of sr2gen2: an ab initio investigation. High Pressure Research, 36(2):198–219, 2016

    2016

  33. [41]

    Allan Craig L

    Dave R. Allan Craig L. Bull, Sarah A. Barnett and William G. Marshall. Hydrogen bonding in ethanol – a high pressure neutron diffraction study. High Pressure Research, 39(1):179–184, 2019

    2019

  34. [42]

    Effect of pressure of vanadium nitride using xrd and dft

    Dujin Liu Yingchun Ding Lun Xiong, Lujun Huang and Junran Zhang. Effect of pressure of vanadium nitride using xrd and dft. High Pressure Research, 43(1):58–67, 2023

    2023

  35. [43]

    Quantum monte carlo study of the phase diagram of solid molecular hydrogen at extreme pressures

    Neil D Drummond, Bartomeu Monserrat, Jonathan H Lloyd-Williams, P L´ opez R ´ ıos, Chris J Pickard, and Richard James Needs. Quantum monte carlo study of the phase diagram of solid molecular hydrogen at extreme pressures. Nature communications, 6(1):7794, 2015

    2015

  36. [44]

    Quantum monte carlo study of high pressure solid molecular hydrogen

    Sam Azadi, WMC Foulkes, and Thomas D K¨ uhne. Quantum monte carlo study of high pressure solid molecular hydrogen. New Journal of Physics , 15(11):113005, 2013

    2013

  37. [45]

    Dissociation of high-pressure solid molecular hydrogen: A quantum monte carlo and anharmonic vibrational study

    Sam Azadi, Bartomeu Monserrat, WMC Foulkes, and RJ Needs. Dissociation of high-pressure solid molecular hydrogen: A quantum monte carlo and anharmonic vibrational study. Physical review letters, 112(16):165501, 2014

    2014

  38. [46]

    Prediction of a mobile solid state in dense hydrogen under high pressures

    Hua Y Geng, Q Wu, and Y Sun. Prediction of a mobile solid state in dense hydrogen under high pressures. The Journal of Physical Chemistry Letters , 8(1):223–228, 2017

    2017

  39. [47]

    Understanding dense hydrogen at planetary conditions

    Ravit Helled, Guglielmo Mazzola, and Ronald Redmer. Understanding dense hydrogen at planetary conditions. Nature Reviews Physics , 2(10):562–574, 2020

    2020

  40. [48]

    On the room-temperature phase diagram of high pressure hydrogen: An ab initio molecular dynamics perspective and a diffusion Monte Carlo study

    Ji Chen, Xinguo Ren, Xin-Zheng Li, Dario Alf` e, and Enge Wang. On the room-temperature phase diagram of high pressure hydrogen: An ab initio molecular dynamics perspective and a diffusion Monte Carlo study. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 141(2):024501, 07 2014

    2014

  41. [49]

    High-pressure structures of solid hydrogen: Insights from ab initio molecular dynamics simulations

    Cong Li. High-pressure structures of solid hydrogen: Insights from ab initio molecular dynamics simulations. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 160(14), 2024

    2024

  42. [50]

    Paquette, Robert J

    Leo A. Paquette, Robert J. Ternansky, Douglas W. Balogh, and Gary Kentgen. Total synthesis of dodecahedrane. J. Am. Chem. Soc. , 105:5446–5450, 1983

    1983

  43. [51]

    James Cross, Martin Saunders, and Horst Prinzbach

    R. James Cross, Martin Saunders, and Horst Prinzbach. Putting helium inside dodecahedrane. Organic Letters, 1:1479–1481, 1999

    1999

  44. [52]

    Molecular dynamics of he en- capsulation in the c20h20 cage at the threshold energy

    Leonard Constantin Gebac, Mircea Bercu, and Valeriu Filip. Molecular dynamics of he en- capsulation in the c20h20 cage at the threshold energy. Fullerenes, Nanotubes and Carbon Nanostructures, 31(5):448–458, 2023

    2023

  45. [53]

    Encapsulating ne inside c20h20

    Leonard Constantin Gebac and Alexandru Niculescu. Encapsulating ne inside c20h20. a molec- ular dynamics study on the stability of the endohedral system. Fullerenes, Nanotubes and Carbon Nanostructures, 31(6):583–591, 2023. 16

    2023

  46. [54]

    Review of hydrogen storage technologies and the crucial role of environmentally friendly carriers

    Weijie Fang, Chunliang Ding, Le Chen, Wenquan Zhou, Jiafan Wang, Kai Huang, Rui Zhu, Jiang Wu, Bangfu Liu, Qi Fang, Xianxuan Wang, and Jiachao Wang. Review of hydrogen storage technologies and the crucial role of environmentally friendly carriers. Energy & Fuels, 38(15):13539–...

    2024

  47. [55]

    Sahar Jafari Daghalian Sofla, Phillip Servio, and Alejandro D. Rey. Atom- istic–geometric–continuum relations of hydrogen structure ii hydrates under triaxial strains. Energy & Fuels, 38(17):17054–17063, 2024

    2024

  48. [56]

    Molecular dynamics investigation into the hydrogen adsorption mechanism of the magnesium-based material 2mg–fe mixture

    Guojun Yu, Zhenqiang Hu, and Yuan Gao. Molecular dynamics investigation into the hydrogen adsorption mechanism of the magnesium-based material 2mg–fe mixture. Energy & Fuels , 36(16):9313–9320, 2022

    2022

  49. [57]

    Germann, Michael Gross, and Mohamed Mehana

    Ruyi Zheng, Timothy C. Germann, Michael Gross, and Mohamed Mehana. Hydrogen diffusion in slit pores: Role of temperature, pressure, confinement, and roughness. Energy & Fuels , 38(21):21642–21650, 2024

    2024

  50. [58]

    Hydrogen diffusion in organic-rich porous media: Implications for hydrogen geo-storage

    Arshad Raza, Saad Alafnan, Guenther Glatz, Muhammad Arif, Mohamed Mahmoud, and Mohamed Gamal Rezk. Hydrogen diffusion in organic-rich porous media: Implications for hydrogen geo-storage. Energy & Fuels, 36(24):15013–15022, 2022

    2022

  51. [59]

    Molecular simulation on h2 huff-n-puff in a depleted shale gas reservoir and its implications on underground hydrogen storage

    Chenyue Xie, Jingwei Huang, Yuanping Li, Shubo Tian, and Hui Zhao. Molecular simulation on h2 huff-n-puff in a depleted shale gas reservoir and its implications on underground hydrogen storage. Energy & Fuels, 39(1):362–375, 2025

    2025

  52. [60]

    Hydrogen diffusion in clay slit: Implications for the geological storage

    Jingyu Liu, Sen Wang, Farzam Javadpour, Qihong Feng, and Luming Cha. Hydrogen diffusion in clay slit: Implications for the geological storage. Energy & Fuels, 36(14):7651–7660, 2022

    2022

  53. [61]

    A conceptional constant- pressure integrated hydrogen purification and storage system by combining the modified graphene and carbon nanotube: A molecular dynamics analysis

    Guojun Yu, Zhenqiang Hu, Yuan Gao, Lizhi Zhang, and Chao Yang. A conceptional constant- pressure integrated hydrogen purification and storage system by combining the modified graphene and carbon nanotube: A molecular dynamics analysis. Energy & Fuels, 35(10):8970– 8981, 2021

    2021

  54. [62]

    Shakil, Aqsa Tayyab, Beriham Basha, S.S.A

    M. Shakil, Aqsa Tayyab, Beriham Basha, S.S.A. Gillani, Amel Ayari-Akkari, and M.S. Al- Buriahi. Evaluation of hydrogen storage capacity of two-dimensional sc2n mxene: A dft study. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy , 69:740–748, 2024

    2024

  55. [63]

    Can endohedral transition metals enhance hydrogen storage in carbon nanotubes? International Journal of Hydrogen Energy , 55:604–610, 2024

    Umedjon Khalilov, Utkir Uljayev, Kamoliddin Mehmonov, Parisa Nematollahi, Maksudbek Yusupov, and Erik Neyts. Can endohedral transition metals enhance hydrogen storage in carbon nanotubes? International Journal of Hydrogen Energy , 55:604–610, 2024

    2024

  56. [64]

    Oliver, Ruyi Zheng, Liangliang Huang, and Mohamed Mehana

    Madeleine C. Oliver, Ruyi Zheng, Liangliang Huang, and Mohamed Mehana. Molecular sim- ulations of hydrogen diffusion in underground porous media: Implications for storage under varying pressure, confinement, and surface chemistry conditions. International Journal of Hydrogen E...

    2024

  57. [65]

    Sequential hydrogen storage in phosphorene nanotubes: A molecular dynamics study

    Wei Zhang, Yang Cui, Chuanhui Zhu, Biyi Huang, Shubin Yan, Yaolin Lou, and Ping Zhang. Sequential hydrogen storage in phosphorene nanotubes: A molecular dynamics study. Inter- national Journal of Hydrogen Energy , 48(62):23909–23916, 2023. 17

    2023

  58. [66]

    Effects of pressure, temperature, and geo- metric structure of pillared graphene on hydrogen storage capacity

    Cheng-Da Wu, Te-Hua Fang, and Jian-Yuan Lo. Effects of pressure, temperature, and geo- metric structure of pillared graphene on hydrogen storage capacity. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37(19):14211–14216, 2012. HYFUSEN

    2012

  59. [67]

    Harrison, E

    D. Harrison, E. Welchman, and T. Thonhauser. H4-alkanes: A new class of hydrogen storage material? International Journal of Hydrogen Energy , 42(4):2223–2228, 2017

    2017

  60. [68]

    Flamina, R.M

    A. Flamina, R.M. Raghavendra, and Anandh Subramaniam. Agarose derived carbon based nanocomposite for hydrogen storage at near-ambient conditions. Carbon, 230:119657, 2024

    2024

  61. [69]

    Lennox, Alexander J

    Mi Tian, Matthew J. Lennox, Alexander J. O’Malley, Alexander J. Porter, Benjamin Kr¨ uner, Svemir Rudi´ c, Timothy J. Mays, Tina D¨ uren, Volker Presser, Lui R. Terry, Stephane Rols, Yanan Fang, Zhili Dong, Sebastien Rochat, and Valeska P. Ting. Effect of pore geometry on ultr...

    2021

  62. [70]

    Quantum chemistry on graphical processing units

    IS Ufimtsev and TJ Mart ´ ınez. Quantum chemistry on graphical processing units. iii. analytical energy gradients and first principles molecular dynamics. J. Chem. Theory Comput , 5:2619, 2009

    2009

  63. [71]

    Development of exchange-correlation functionals with minimal many-electron self-interaction error

    Aron J Cohen, Paula Mori-S´ anchez, and Weitao Yang. Development of exchange-correlation functionals with minimal many-electron self-interaction error. The Journal of chemical physics, 126(19), 2007

    2007

  64. [72]

    Testing exchange–correlation functionals at fractional electron numbers

    Ali Malek, Degao Peng, Weitao Yang, Robert Balawender, and Andrzej Holas. Testing exchange–correlation functionals at fractional electron numbers. Theoretical Chemistry Ac- counts, 133:1–7, 2014

    2014

  65. [73]

    Well-behaved versus ill-behaved den- sity functionals for single bond dissociation: Separating success from disaster functional by functional for stretched h2

    Diptarka Hait, Adam Rettig, and Martin Head-Gordon. Well-behaved versus ill-behaved den- sity functionals for single bond dissociation: Separating success from disaster functional by functional for stretched h2. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 150(9):094115, 2019

    2019

  66. [74]

    Unifying general and segmented contracted basis sets

    Frank Jensen. Unifying general and segmented contracted basis sets. segmented polarization consistent basis sets. Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation , 10(3):1074–1085, 2014. PMID: 26580184

    2014

  67. [75]

    Anders M. N. Niklasson, Peter Steneteg, Anders Odell, Nicolas Bock, Matt Challacombe, C. J. Tymczak, Erik Holmstr¨ om, Guishan Zheng, and Valery Weber. Extended Lagrangian Born–Oppenheimer molecular dynamics with dissipation. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 130(21):214109, 06 2009

    2009

  68. [76]

    Implementation of molecular dynamics simulation for the h6@c20h20 system in terachem software; results & video, February 2025

    Leonard Gebac. Implementation of molecular dynamics simulation for the h6@c20h20 system in terachem software; results & video, February 2025

    2025

  69. [77]

    A. D. Zakirova and D. Sh. Sabirov. Volume of the fullerene cages of endofullerenes and hy- drogenated endofullerenes with encapsulated atoms of noble gases and nonadditivity of their polarizability. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. , 94:963–971, 2020

    2020

  70. [78]

    R. F. W. Bader and M. A. Austen. Properties of atoms in molecules: Atoms under pressure. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 107(11):4271–4285, 09 1997. 18

    1997

  71. [79]

    A comparative study using state- of-the-art electronic structure theories on solid hydrogen phases under high pressures

    Ke Liao, Xin-Zheng Li, Ali Alavi, and Andreas Gr¨ uneis. A comparative study using state- of-the-art electronic structure theories on solid hydrogen phases under high pressures. npj Computational Materials , 5(1):110, 2019

    2019

  72. [80]

    Geometry optimization made simple with translation and rotation coordinates

    Lee-Ping Wang and Chenchen Song. Geometry optimization made simple with translation and rotation coordinates. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 144(21):214108, 06 2016

    2016

  73. [81]

    Boltachev and J¨ urn W

    Grey Sh. Boltachev and J¨ urn W. P. Schmelzer. On the definition of temperature and its fluctuations in small systems. The Journal of Chemical Physics , 133(13):134509, 10 2010

    2010

  74. [82]

    Mao, and Ho-Kwang Mao

    Bing Li, Yang Ding, Duck Young Kim, Lin Wang, Tsu-Chien Weng, Wenge Yang, Zhenhai Yu, Cheng Ji, Junyue Wang, Jinfu Shu, Jiuhua Chen, Ke Yang, Yuming Xiao, Paul Chow, Guoyin Shen, Wendy L. Mao, and Ho-Kwang Mao. Probing the electronic band gap of solid hydrogen by inelastic x-r...

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.