Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

A Possible Mass Ratio and Spin-Orbit Misalignment Correlation for Mergers of Binary Black Holes in Nuclear Star Clusters

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Black-hole binaries formed near a supermassive black hole should show a predictable anti-correlation between mass ratio and spin-orbit misalignment.

desk verdict A credible new spin-channel for NSC BBH mergers, but the q-θ anti-correlation is only as strong as the double-stable-MT mapping. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.16258 v1 pith:VL72HM7D submitted 2025-01-27 astro-ph.HE

Yubo Su This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords binaryblackholemergersspin-orbitmisalignmentmassratiocorrelationvonZeipel-Lidov-Kozaieffectnuclearstarclustersstabletransfergravitationalwavesadiabaticinvariant
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a formation route for merging binary black holes in which the final spin orientation is not random but is tied to the binary's mass ratio. The route begins with a stellar binary near a supermassive black hole that passes through two stable phases of mass transfer, producing a black-hole binary whose orbital size is positively correlated with its mass ratio. A distant massive perturber then drives the binary to merge through the von Zeipel-Lidov-Kozai effect, and an adiabatic invariant in the spin dynamics converts the size-mass-ratio correlation into an anti-correlation between the final spin-orbit misalignment angle and the mass ratio. If correct, this gives a purely dynamical channel that reproduces the observed preference for preferentially aligned spins and the apparent effective-spin versus mass-ratio trend without relying on gas or detailed hydrodynamics.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the adiabatic invariant $\theta_{\rm eff} = \cos^{-1}(\hat{s} \cdot \hat{\Omega}_{\rm eff})$, the angle between each black hole spin and the effective spin precession axis $\Omega_{\rm eff} = \langle \Omega_{\rm dS} \hat{\jmath}_{\rm in}\rangle - \langle \Omega_{\rm ZLK}\rangle \hat{\jmath}_{\rm out}$, averaged over von Zeipel-Lidov-Kozai cycles. Because this angle is conserved while the binary shrinks, the final spin-orbit misalignment is set by its initial value, which for initially aligned spins reduces to $\theta_{\rm eff,0} \approx |\bar{A}_0 - I_0|$ with $\bar{A}_0 \propto a_{\rm in,0}^{-4}$; wider binaries therefore merge with small tilts near the known 90-degree attractor, while more compact binaries emerge with larger prograde tilts. The second piece is the four-phase double stable mass-transfer prescription, which yields a positive correlation between the black-hole binary's initial semi-major axis and its mass ratio while leaving the binary wide enough for the tertiary to act. A supporting requirement is that the stellar binary's rotational bulge suppresses Kozai oscillations until both stars collapse to black holes, after which only general-relativistic precession remains and the Kozai effect can drive the merger.

What would settle it

Run a full binary evolution calculation that treats two stable mass-transfer phases self-consistently for the same progenitor masses and separations; if the resulting black-hole binaries do not show a positive correlation between semi-major axis and mass ratio, the predicted spin anti-correlation cannot arise, and a growing gravitational-wave catalog with no joint mass-ratio and tilt anti-correlation would also rule out the channel as a significant contributor.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that, when a stellar binary forms a black-hole binary through two phases of stable mass transfer and that binary is later driven to merger by the gravitational perturbation of a distant massive object such as a supermassive black hole, the resulting spin-orbit misalignment angles are anti-correlated with the binary mass ratio. The mass-transfer phases leave the binary with a positive correlation between its initial semi-major axis and its mass ratio, while the tertiary-driven merger maps smaller initial semi-major axes to larger misalignment angles through a conserved adiabatic invariant; the two correlations chain together into the predicted mass-ratio versus spin-tilt anti-correlation. The resulting spin distributions are prograde-biased and sharply peaked, tighter than the correlations currently seen in gravitational-wave data, and the paper argues they are reminiscent of the observed trend between effective spin and mass ratio.

Load-bearing premise

The chain depends on the assumption that these stellar binaries really undergo two stable phases of mass transfer with the adopted mass-loss and angular-momentum fractions, producing a positive correlation between black-hole binary orbital size and mass ratio; if instead a common-envelope phase occurs or the mass-transfer parameters differ, the predicted spin-mass-ratio anti-correlation would weaken or reverse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Black-hole binaries formed through this channel should show a prograde bias in spin orientation and an anti-correlation between mass ratio and spin-orbit misalignment angle.
  • The channel predicts spin distributions that are sharper than current gravitational-wave constraints, so it can contribute to the observed population but cannot dominate it alone if the data continue to favor a broad distribution.
  • The same stellar binary survives to form a black-hole binary and only then becomes vulnerable to Kozai-driven merger, giving a testable ordering of evolutionary phases rather than a single simultaneous process.
  • Future gravitational-wave catalogs can search for the signature directly by jointly inferring mass ratio and spin orientation, rather than relying only on the effective spin parameter.
  • If the mass-transfer parameters differ from the adopted values, the underlying size-mass-ratio correlation weakens or reverses, so the predicted spin signature also serves as a diagnostic of double stable mass transfer.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A targeted test would be a hierarchical Bayesian analysis of gravitational-wave events looking for a mass-ratio-dependent tilt distribution with a peak near sixty degrees, a signature specific enough that a few hundred events could distinguish this channel from isotropic spin models.
  • The same adiabatic-invariant machinery should imprint similar mass-ratio-dependent tilts in other tertiary-induced merger settings, such as stellar-mass triples, although octupole and non-adiabatic effects would broaden or shift the correlation.
  • If two-body or resonant relaxation reorients stellar binaries into Kozai-active configurations, the narrow parameter space identified here could widen substantially, raising the event rate and making the channel more competitive with gas-driven and isolated formation.
  • The assumption that black hole spins start aligned with the orbit is itself a prediction of the double mass-transfer history, so observing the predicted correlation would double as evidence that stable mass transfer aligns spins before black hole formation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper proposes a new formation channel for merging binary black holes (BBHs) in nuclear star clusters, in which a stellar binary first undergoes two phases of stable mass transfer and later is driven to merger by the tidal perturbation of a supermassive black hole tertiary. The authors combine an adiabatic invariant for the spin-orbit evolution of the inner binary (Section 2.2, Eq. 40) with a four-phase Soberman et al. (1997) mass-transfer prescription (Section 3.2) to argue that the resulting BBH population has a positive correlation between the initial semi-major axis and the mass ratio, and therefore an anti-correlation between the final spin-orbit misalignment angle theta and mass ratio q. The spin-dynamics part is tested against direct numerical integrations (Fig. 3), while the mass-transfer part is explored with a free-parameter grid (Fig. 5). The paper is explicitly framed as a proof-of-concept channel with a narrow parameter space.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the paper provides a concrete, falsifiable prediction: merging BBHs formed through this channel should show a distinctive anti-correlation between mass ratio and spin-orbit misalignment, in contrast to the isotropic spin distributions expected from more violent dynamical channels. The spin-dynamics analysis is a genuine strength: Eq. (40) is compared with numerical integrations in Fig. 3 and the adiabatic invariant is re-tested in the relevant parameter space rather than merely assumed. The paper also offers a physically motivated route to initial spin alignment via mass transfer, addressing a known weakness of previous tertiary-induced merger studies. The main limitation is that the predicted correlation is only as robust as the simplified double stable mass-transfer model, and the authors are candid that the detailed physics of this phase remains uncertain. Because the prediction is observable with LVK and future gravitational-wave detectors, the paper is a valuable contribution even if the proposed channel is not the dominant BBH formation route.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.2, Fig. 5] The sign of d ain/dqin, which is load-bearing for the predicted q-theta anti-correlation through Eq. (40), is not demonstrated to be robust over the full free-parameter set of the mass-transfer prescription. Figure 5 varies eta_wind, epsilon_tilde_2, and f_core, but fixes epsilon_tilde_4 = 0, and the text itself notes in Section 6.3 that epsilon_tilde_2 may depend on mass ratio and that the stable-mass-transfer assumption may fail for extreme mass ratios. Because Eq. (40) is monotonic in a_in,0 at fixed I0, any change in the sign of d ain/dqin directly flips the predicted theta-q correlation. The central claim would be substantially strengthened by testing the double-mass-transfer stage with a modern binary evolution code such as POSYDON, or at least by mapping d ain/dqin over epsilon_tilde_4 > 0 and mass-ratio-dependent epsilon_tilde_2.
  2. [Section 4, initial spin alignment] The predicted anti-correlation assumes that both BH spins are initially aligned with the inner orbit normal, imposed in Section 4. For the second-formed BH this is physically plausible because of mass transfer, but for the first-formed BH the spin orientation is set by the core of the primary after envelope stripping, and the model does not include any misalignment from the collapse process or from residual spin-orbit misalignment of the stellar core. A non-negligible fraction of misaligned primary spins would broaden the theta distribution and dilute the correlation. The authors should either state explicitly how large such a contaminating fraction can be before the predicted anti-correlation becomes unobservable, or test a population with partially misaligned primary spins.
  3. [Section 2.2, Fig. 6] The analytic expression Eq. (40) is derived under the approximation A_bar_0 less than or similar to cos I0 and I0 close to 90 degrees, which the authors note is violated over part of the parameter space (Fig. 3, bottom panel). Since Fig. 6 uses direct numerical integrations, the qualitative prediction is not invalidated, but the paper would be stronger if it quantified how well the analytic Eq. (40) reproduces the numerical theta-q relation in Fig. 6, for example by overlaying the analytic prediction on the numerical points or reporting a correlation coefficient for the merging population.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 5] The paragraph beginning 'However, observations of the Mil' appears to contain a truncated or duplicated phrase and should be rewritten for clarity.
  2. [Figure 4 caption] The caption contains the typo 'blcak' for 'black' in the description of the lines.
  3. [Section 3.2, Eq. (54)] The mass ratio q in Eq. (54) is not explicitly defined in the mass-transfer context; since mass-ratio inversion occurs later, the convention (donor/accretor versus m2/m1) should be stated explicitly to avoid confusion with q_BH.
  4. [Section 3.2] The notation for the mass-transfer parameters is inconsistent between epsilon_2, beta_2 and their tilded versions; the text should define once and then use a single notation throughout.
  5. [Section 6.3] The word 'unimodial' should be 'unimodal', and 'preceeding' should be 'preceding'.
  6. [Figure 3 caption] The 'arbitrary a^{-4} line' in the bottom panel could be misread as a physical scaling; clarify that it is only a guide to the eye and not a fit to the numerical data.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the q-θ anti-correlation is an emergent composition of a numerically tested spin invariant and a parameter-robust mass-transfer correlation.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained. Section 2 derives the final spin-orbit misalignment from the adiabatic invariant θeff (Eqs. 36-42) and validates the approximate Eq. (40) against direct numerical integrations in Fig. 3, so the self-cited Su et al. (2021a) result is re-tested here rather than merely imported. Section 3.2 constructs a four-phase stable mass-transfer prescription with explicit fiducial parameters (ηwind, ϵ̃2, ϵ̃4, fcore); the positive ain-qin correlation in Fig. 4 is an emergent output of the S97 angular-momentum bookkeeping, not a fitted input, and Fig. 5 shows it persists across parameter choices. The q-θ anti-correlation then follows by composing this correlation with the monotone θ(ain) relation of Eq. (40); no step defines the predicted quantity in terms of the target LVK observation. The paper's own caveats about uncertain mass-transfer physics (Section 6.3) and the assumption of initial spin-orbit alignment are modeling uncertainties and assumptions, not circularity, because they do not reduce the prediction to its inputs by definition.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a numerically verified spin invariant from prior work and on a semi-analytical binary evolution prescription whose free parameters are varied but not fitted to observations. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (6)
  • wind mass-loss fraction ηwind = 0.2
    Fiducial value in Section 3.2; controls how much envelope mass is lost before MT and affects the a-q correlation. Explored in Fig. 5.
  • first stable MT accretion fraction ϵ2 = 0.4 (with β2=0.4)
    Fraction of primary's envelope accreted by the secondary during the first stable MT phase. Standard in modern BSE studies; varied in Fig. 5.
  • second stable MT accretion fraction ϵ4 = 0
    Assumed zero because the BH accretor is Eddington-limited (Section 3.2).
  • core mass fraction fcore = 0.5 constant or 0.4 + m/320M⊙
    Approximated from MESA/MIST tracks; determines remnant masses and MT outcomes.
  • initial stellar binary semi-major axis ain,⋆ = 2 AU
    Fiducial value; chosen so the BBH can merge within 1 Gyr and satisfy SRF suppression constraints. Not fitted to data.
  • SMBH mass m3 and outer orbit (aout, eout) = 10^7 M⊙, 8000 AU, 0.6
    Fiducial parameters defining the allowed parameter space (Fig. 7); not fitted.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Adiabatic invariant θeff is conserved during the ZLK-driven inspiral
    Taken from Su et al. (2021a); the paper verifies it numerically for the present systems (Fig. 1 and 3) but does not re-derive it.
  • domain assumption BH spins are aligned with the inner orbital angular momentum after double stable MT
    Section 3.2 and 4; justified by tidal alignment and MT, but not modeled in detail.
  • domain assumption The stellar binary evolves through two phases of stable mass transfer using the S97 angular-momentum loss equations
    Section 3.2; a model assumption based on recent BSE literature, with free parameters.
  • domain assumption Rotational bulge suppresses ZLK oscillations during the stellar phase while GR precession does not during the BH phase
    Section 3.1; ϵrot > 9/4 and ϵGR ≲ 1 are required for the mechanism.
  • domain assumption No significant natal kicks during BH formation
    Section 6.2; justified by the large orbital velocities (vin ~ 200 km/s) in the compact binaries considered.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A Possible Mass Ratio and Spin-Orbit Misalignment Correlation for Mergers of Binary Black Holes in Nuclear Star Clusters." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VL72HM7D

@misc{pith2026250116258,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A Possible Mass Ratio and Spin-Orbit Misalignment Correlation for Mergers of Binary Black Holes in Nuclear Star Clusters},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VL72HM7D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.16258}
}
abstract

Despite a decade's worth of gravitational wave observation, the origin of the binary black hole (BBH) mergers detected by the LIGO-VIRGO-Kagra (LVK) collaboration remains an open question. Towards assessing the feasibility and prevalence of the many proposed BBH formation channels, the spin properties of the merging black holes (BHs) hold significant promise, particularly their orientations. The combined trends of a moderate preferential alignment of BH spins with their orbit normals and an apparent correlation of BBH effective spin parameters $\chi_{\rm eff}$ with their mass ratios seem to favor hydrodynamical BBH formation mechanisms over purely dynamical ones, as they introduce a preferred orientation to the system. However, such processes are filled with physical and modeling uncertainties. In this paper, we highlight a dynamical route to easily characterizable spin evolution that results in analytically-predictable spin distributions. We show that, when a stellar binary forms a BBH through two phases of stable mass transfer, and the BBH is subsequently driven to merger by the gravitational perturbation of a distant massive object (such as a supermassive black hole), the resulting spin-orbit misalignment angles are anti-correlated with the binary mass ratio. While the mechanism as proposed only operates in a somewhat narrow region of parameter space, it also predicts significantly tighter correlations than are seen in the LVK systems. We discuss avenues for future work that may significantly expand the parameter space of our mechanism while still remaining broadly consistent with observations.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.16258 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A binary’s semi-major axis (top left), eccen￾tricity (top right), inclination (bottom left), and spin-orbit misalignment angle θ (bottom-left) as it coalesces via the tertiary-induced merger channel in the vicinity of a SMBH. As the eccentricity and inclination oscillate periodically due to the ZLK effect, the enhanced emission of GW induces the BBH to merge. Note that θ experiences significant oscilla￾tions but eve… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Notation of angles used to describe the adiabatic invariant in Section 2.2. Ωeff is the effective spin precession axis, given by Eq. (35). Note that initially, ˆs0 = ˆȷ, and so θeff = [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. In these plots, we show how the final spin orientations of tertiary-induced BBH mergers change with their initial semi-major axis (we choose to vary ain,0 ∈ {2, 3, 4, 5} AU) across a range of initial mutual inclinations I0 between the inner and outer orbits. In the top panel, we show the merger times as a function of I0 and ain,0 (leg￾end), where systems that evolve for longer than 1 Gyr are labeled with triangles (… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: In the first panel, we show the final mass ra￾tio qf obtained after the four-step mass transfer prescription discussed in Section 3.2. The red line denotes systems that experience mass ratio inversion, where the more massive BH is formed from the initially less massive…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The left column of plots shows the values of the mean correlation dain/dqin and the mean semi-major axis change ⟨ain/ain,⋆⟩ as a function of ηwind and ˜ϵ2, two of the three free parameters of the MT prescription laid out in Section 3.2; the third, fcore, is fixed at 0.…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The properties of successfully merging BBH systems after the combined double mass transfer and orbital evolution summarized in Section 4, corresponding to the MT prescription shown in the left panels of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Parameter space available for the mechanism in this paper to form black hole binaries around a 107M⊙ SMBH (top) and around a 108M⊙ SMBH (bottom). The blue dotted line denotes the condition for dynamical instabil￾ity (Eq. 61), the black dashed lines denote the condition…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Eccentric von Zeipel-Lidov-Kozai effects under mildly hierarchical triple systems: Influence of Brown corrections upon orbit flipping

    astro-ph.EP 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Brown Hamiltonian corrections extended to octupole-octupole order explain why orbit-flipping regions become asymmetric in mildly hierarchical triple systems.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

176 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    2023, ApJS, 267, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acdc9f

    Abbott, R., Abe, H., Acernese, F., et al. 2023, ApJS, 267, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acdc9f

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/acdc9f 2023

  2. [2]

    2020, MNRAS, 497, 4549, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2264

    Agrawal, P., Hurley, J., Stevenson, S., Sz´ ecsi, D., & Flynn, C. 2020, MNRAS, 497, 4549, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2264

    doi:10.1093/mnras/staa2264 2020

  3. [3]

    1973, Astrophysics and Space Science, 23, 459

    Alexander, M. 1973, Astrophysics and Space Science, 23, 459

    1973

  4. [4]

    2017, ARA&A, 55, 17, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055306

    Alexander, T. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 17, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055306

    doi:10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055306 2017

  5. [5]

    2020, ApJ, 896, 100, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab93ae

    Ali, B., Paul, D., Eckart, A., et al. 2020, ApJ, 896, 100, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab93ae

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab93ae 2020

  6. [6]

    J., Bavera, S

    Andrews, J. J., Bavera, S. S., Briel, M., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.02376, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.02376

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2411.02376 2024

  7. [7]

    2010, ApJ, 713, 90, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/713/1/90

    Antonini, F., Faber, J., Gualandris, A., & Merritt, D. 2010, ApJ, 713, 90, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/713/1/90

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/713/1/90 2010

  8. [8]

    2014, ApJ, 781, 45, doi: 10.1088/0004-637x/781/1/45

    Antonini, F., Murray, N., & Mikkola, S. 2014, ApJ, 781, 45, doi: 10.1088/0004-637x/781/1/45

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/781/1/45 2014

Show all 176 references
  1. [9]

    Antonini, F., & Perets, H. B. 2012a, ApJ, 757, 27, doi: 10.1088/0004-637x/757/1/27 —. 2012b, ApJ, 757, 27, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/757/1/27

    doi

  2. [10]

    Antonini, F., & Rasio, F. A. 2016, ApJ, 831, 187, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/831/2/187

    2016 doi

  3. [11]

    L., Petrovich, C., & Fischer, C

    Antonini, F., Rodriguez, C. L., Petrovich, C., & Fischer, C. L. 2018, MNRAS: Letters, 480, L58

    2018

  4. [12]

    Antonini, F., Toonen, S., & Hamers, A. S. 2017, ApJ, 841, 77, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6f5e Arca Sedda, M., Mapelli, M., Benacquista, M., & Spera, M. 2023, MNRAS, 520, 5259, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad331 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A,...

    2017 doi

  5. [13]

    N., & Wolf, R

    Bahcall, J. N., & Wolf, R. A. 1976, ApJ, 209, 214, doi: 10.1086/154711

    1976 doi

  6. [14]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.03461, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.03461

    Baibhav, V., & Kalogera, V. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.03461, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.03461

    2024 doi arXiv

  7. [15]

    Andrews, J. J. 2023, ApJ, 959, 106, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0557

    2023 doi

  8. [16]

    2010, MNRAS, 402, 371, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15880.x

    Banerjee, S., Baumgardt, H., & Kroupa, P. 2010, MNRAS, 402, 371, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15880.x

    2010

  9. [17]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.15112, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.15112

    Banerjee, S., & Olejak, A. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.15112, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.15112

    2024 doi arXiv

  10. [18]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.03832, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.03832

    Barber, J., & Antonini, F. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.03832, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.03832

    2024 doi arXiv

  11. [19]

    M., & O’Connell, R

    Barker, B. M., & O’Connell, R. F. 1975, PhRvD, 12, 329, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.12.329

    1975 doi

  12. [20]

    2017, ApJ, 835, 165, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/165

    Bartos, I., Kocsis, B., Haiman, Z., & M´ arka, S. 2017, ApJ, 835, 165, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/835/2/165

    2017 doi

  13. [21]

    2010, ApJL, 715, L138, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/715/2/L138 18

    Belczynski, K., Dominik, M., Bulik, T., et al. 2010, ApJL, 715, L138, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/715/2/L138 18

    2010 doi

  14. [22]

    E., Bulik, T., & O’Shaughnessy, R

    Belczynski, K., Holz, D. E., Bulik, T., & O’Shaughnessy, R. 2016, Nature, 534, 512

    2016

  15. [23]

    E., et al

    Belczynski, K., Klencki, J., Fields, C. E., et al. 2020, A&A, 636, A104, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936528

    2020 doi

  16. [24]

    2008, Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition (Princeton University Press)

    Binney, J., & Tremaine, S. 2008, Galactic Dynamics: Second Edition (Princeton University Press)

    2008

  17. [25]

    1995, A&A, 297, 483

    Braun, H., & Langer, N. 1995, A&A, 297, 483

    1995

  18. [26]

    L., Lamberts, A., et al

    Bruel, T., Rodriguez, C. L., Lamberts, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 686, A106, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348716

    2024 doi

  19. [27]

    B., El-Badry, K., Kara, E., et al

    Burdge, K. B., El-Badry, K., Kara, E., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.03719

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Callister, T. A. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.19145, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.19145

    2024 doi arXiv

  21. [29]

    A., & Farr, W

    Callister, T. A., & Farr, W. M. 2024, Physical Review X, 14, 021005, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.14.021005

    2024 doi

  22. [30]

    Farr, W. M. 2021, ApJL, 922, L5, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac2ccc

    2021 doi

  23. [31]

    Chattopadhyay, D., Stegmann, J., Antonini, F., Barber, J., & Romero-Shaw, I. M. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 4908, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3048

    2023 doi

  24. [32]

    2016, ApJ, 823, 102, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102

    Choi, J., Dotter, A., Conroy, C., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, 102, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102

    2016 doi

  25. [33]

    S., Do, T., Ghez, A., et al

    Chu, D. S., Do, T., Ghez, A., et al. 2023, ApJ, 948, 94, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc93e

    2023 doi

  26. [34]

    F., & Sari, R

    Collins, B. F., & Sari, R. 2008, ApJ, 136, 2552, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2552

    2008 doi

  27. [35]

    Conway, L., & Will, C. M. 2024, PhRvD, 110, 083022, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.110.083022

    2024 doi

  28. [36]

    E., McKernan, B., Ford, K

    Cook, H. E., McKernan, B., Ford, K. E. S., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.10590, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.10590

    2024 doi arXiv

  29. [37]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2311.15778, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2311.15778

    Costa, G., Chru´ sli´ nska, M., Klencki, J., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2311.15778, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2311.15778

    2023 doi arXiv

  30. [38]

    E., et al

    De, K., MacLeod, M., Jencson, J. E., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.14778, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.14778 De Mink, S., & Mandel, I. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 3545

    2024 doi

  31. [39]

    2015, ApJ, 809, 143, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/809/2/143

    Do, T., Kerzendorf, W., Winsor, N., et al. 2015, ApJ, 809, 143, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/809/2/143

    2015 doi

  32. [40]

    2012, ApJ, 759, 52

    Dominik, M., Belczynski, K., Fryer, C., et al. 2012, ApJ, 759, 52

    2012

  33. [41]

    2016, ApJS, 222, 8, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8

    Dotter, A. 2016, ApJS, 222, 8, doi: 10.3847/0067-0049/222/1/8

    2016 doi

  34. [42]

    2010, MNRAS, 407, 1946

    Downing, J., Benacquista, M., Giersz, M., & Spurzem, R. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 1946

    2010

  35. [43]

    2023, ApJ, 946, 16, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb5ed

    Edelman, B., Farr, B., & Doctor, Z. 2023, ApJ, 946, 16, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb5ed

    2023 doi

  36. [44]

    Eggenberger, P., Buldgen, G., & Salmon, S. J. A. J. 2019, A&A, 626, L1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935509

    2019 doi

  37. [45]

    P., & Kiseleva-Eggleton, L

    Eggleton, P. P., & Kiseleva-Eggleton, L. 2001, ApJ, 562, 1012, doi: 10.1086/323843

    2001 doi

  38. [46]

    2004, ApJ, 601, 319, doi: 10.1086/380392

    Serabyn, E. 2004, ApJ, 601, 319, doi: 10.1086/380392

    2004 doi

  39. [47]

    B., Kozinsky, B., & Rasio, F

    Ford, E. B., Kozinsky, B., & Rasio, F. A. 2000, ApJ, 535, 385

    2000

  40. [48]

    2024, in Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics (Springer), 3719–3773

    Fornasini, F., Antoniou, V., & Dubus, G. 2024, in Handbook of X-ray and Gamma-ray Astrophysics (Springer), 3719–3773

    2024

  41. [49]

    2019, MNRAS, 488, 728, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1723

    Fragione, G., & Antonini, F. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 728, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1723

    2019 doi

  42. [50]

    2019, MNRAS, 488, 47, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1651

    Perna, R. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 47, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1651

    2019 doi

  43. [51]

    2020, MNRAS, 493, 3920, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa443

    Fragione, G., & Kocsis, B. 2020, MNRAS, 493, 3920, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa443

    2020 doi

  44. [52]

    2019, MNRAS, 486, 4443

    Fragione, G., & Loeb, A. 2019, MNRAS, 486, 4443

    2019

  45. [53]

    J., Bavera, S

    Fragos, T., Andrews, J. J., Bavera, S. S., et al. 2023, ApJS, 264, 45, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac90c1

    2023 doi

  46. [54]

    2019, ApJL, 881, L1

    Fuller, J., & Ma, L. 2019, ApJL, 881, L1

    2019

  47. [55]

    2018, A&A, 609, A26, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730451

    Gallego-Cano, E., Sch¨ odel, R., Dong, H., et al. 2018, A&A, 609, A26, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201730451

    2018 doi

  48. [56]

    2021, ApJ, 922, 110, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2610

    Kalogera, V. 2021, ApJ, 922, 110, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac2610

    2021 doi

  49. [57]

    2023, PhRvD, 108, 024042, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.024042

    Gerosa, D., Fumagalli, G., Mould, M., et al. 2023, PhRvD, 108, 024042, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.024042

    2023 doi

  50. [58]

    2013, PhRvD, 87, 104028, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.104028

    Sperhake, U. 2013, PhRvD, 87, 104028, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.87.104028

    2013 doi

  51. [59]

    2020, ApJ, 891, 141, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7335 Gond´ an, L., Kocsis, B., Raffai, P., & Frei, Z

    Giacobbo, N., & Mapelli, M. 2020, ApJ, 891, 141, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7335 Gond´ an, L., Kocsis, B., Raffai, P., & Frei, Z. 2018, ApJ, 860, 5

    2020 doi

  52. [60]

    2024, MNRAS, 533, 486, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1833

    Grishin, E. 2024, MNRAS, 533, 486, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1833

    2024 doi

  53. [61]

    Grishin, E., & Perets, H. B. 2022, MNRAS, 512, 4993, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac706

    2022 doi

  54. [62]

    B., & Fragione, G

    Grishin, E., Perets, H. B., & Fragione, G. 2018, MNRAS, 481, 4907, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2477

    2018 doi

  55. [63]

    S., Bar-Or, B., Petrovich, C., & Antonini, F

    Hamers, A. S., Bar-Or, B., Petrovich, C., & Antonini, F. 2018, ApJ, 865, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aadae2

    2018 doi

  56. [64]

    2024, MNRAS, 532, 2425, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1654

    Hamilton, C., & Modak, S. 2024, MNRAS, 532, 2425, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1654

    2024 doi

  57. [65]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357

    2020

  58. [66]

    2024, PhRvD, 109, 103006, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.103006 19

    Heinzel, J., Vitale, S., & Biscoveanu, S. 2024, PhRvD, 109, 103006, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.109.103006 19

    2024 doi

  59. [67]

    1983, Ap&SS, 96, 37, doi: 10.1007/BF00661941

    Hellings, P. 1983, Ap&SS, 96, 37, doi: 10.1007/BF00661941

    1983 doi

  60. [68]

    2018, ApJ, 856, 140

    Dosopoulou, F. 2018, ApJ, 856, 140

    2018

  61. [69]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science and Engineering, 9, 90

    2007

  62. [70]

    R., Tout, C

    Hurley, J. R., Tout, C. A., & Pols, O. R. 2002, MNRAS, 329, 897, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05038.x

    2002

  63. [71]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.02252, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.02252

    Hussain, A., Isi, M., & Zimmerman, A. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.02252, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.02252

    2024 doi arXiv

  64. [72]

    1985, in IAU Symposium, Vol

    Hut, P. 1985, in IAU Symposium, Vol. 113, Dynamics of Star Clusters, ed. J. Goodman & P. Hut, 231–247

    1985

  65. [73]

    S., Bauer, E

    Jermyn, A. S., Bauer, E. B., Schwab, J., et al. 2023, ApJS, 265, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acae8d

    2023 doi

  66. [74]

    2021, A&A, 655, A29, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141080

    Johnston, C. 2021, A&A, 655, A29, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141080

    2021 doi

  67. [75]

    Y., & Hoang, B.-M

    Jurado, C., Naoz, S., Lam, C. Y., & Hoang, B.-M. 2024, ApJ, 971, 95, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad55ee

    2024 doi

  68. [76]

    Kimball, C., Talbot, C., Berry, C. P. L., et al. 2021, ApJL, 915, L35, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac0aef

    2021 doi

  69. [77]

    2023, ApJL, 952, L34, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ace526 Kıro˘ glu, F., Lombardi, Jr., J

    Kimball, C., Imperato, S., Kalogera, V., et al. 2023, ApJL, 952, L34, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ace526 Kıro˘ glu, F., Lombardi, Jr., J. C., Kremer, K., Vanderzyden, H. D., & Rasio, F. A. 2025, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2501.09068, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2501.09068

    2023 doi arXiv

  70. [78]

    G., Eggleton, P

    Kiseleva, L. G., Eggleton, P. P., & Mikkola, S. 1998, MNRAS, 300, 292, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01903.x

    1998

  71. [79]

    2022, A&A, 662, A56, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142701

    Klencki, Jakub, Istrate, Alina, Nelemans, Gijs, & Pols, Onno. 2022, A&A, 662, A56, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142701

    2022 doi

  72. [81]

    Lai, D., & Mu˜ noz, D. J. 2023, ARA&A, 61, 517, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-052622-022933

    2023 doi

  73. [82]

    D., & Lifshitz, E

    Landau, L. D., & Lifshitz, E. M. 1969, Mechanics (Wesley Publishing Company, Inc., Reading, Massachusetts)

    1969

  74. [83]

    W., Geller, A

    Leigh, N. W., Geller, A. M., McKernan, B., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 5672

    2018

  75. [84]

    Leigh, N. W. C., Antonini, F., Stone, N. C., Shara, M. M., & Merritt, D. 2016, MNRAS, 463, 1605, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2018 L´ epine, J. R. D., Cruz, P., Scarano, S., J., et al. 2011, MNRAS, 417, 698, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19314.x

    2016

  76. [85]

    2022, ApJ, 934, 154, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c0d

    Li, J., Lai, D., & Rodet, L. 2022, ApJ, 934, 154, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac7c0d

    2022 doi

  77. [86]

    2022, MNRAS, 517, 1602, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2577

    Li, R., & Lai, D. 2022, MNRAS, 517, 1602, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2577

    2022 doi

  78. [87]

    2024a, ApJ, 977, 67, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad83b5

    Li, Y.-J., Tang, S.-P., Gao, S.-J., Wu, D.-C., & Wang, Y.-Z. 2024a, ApJ, 977, 67, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad83b5

    doi

  79. [88]

    2025, arXiv e-prints

    Li, Y.-J., Wang, Y.-Z., Tang, S.-P., Chen, T., & Fan, Y.-Z. 2025, arXiv e-prints. https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.09495

    2025 arXiv

  80. [89]

    2024b, PhRvL, 133, 051401, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.051401

    Li, Y.-J., Wang, Y.-Z., Tang, S.-P., & Fan, Y.-Z. 2024b, PhRvL, 133, 051401, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.133.051401

    doi

  81. [90]

    M., Li, S., Li, H., & Li, J

    Li, Y.-P., Dempsey, A. M., Li, S., Li, H., & Li, J. 2021, ApJ, 911, 124, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abed48

    2021 doi

  82. [91]

    Lidov, M. L. 1962, Planetary and Space Science, 9, 719

    1962

  83. [92]

    1997, Astronomy Letters, 23, 492

    Lipunov, V., Postnov, K., & Prokhorov, M. 1997, Astronomy Letters, 23, 492

    1997

  84. [93]

    2017, ApJL, 846, L11 —

    Liu, B., & Lai, D. 2017, ApJL, 846, L11 —. 2018, ApJ, 863, 68

    2017

  85. [94]

    2019, MNRAS, 483, 4060, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3432 —

    Liu, B., & Lai, D. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 4060, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3432 —. 2020, PhRvD, 102, 023020, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.023020

    2019 doi

  86. [95]

    2021, MNRAS, 502, 2049

    Liu, B., & Lai, D. 2021, MNRAS, 502, 2049

    2021

  87. [96]

    2019a, ApJ, 881, 41, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2dfb —

    Liu, B., Lai, D., & Wang, Y.-H. 2019a, ApJ, 881, 41, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2dfb —. 2019b, ApJL, 883, L7, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab40c0

    doi

  88. [97]

    J., & Lai, D

    Liu, B., Mu˜ noz, D. J., & Lai, D. 2015a, MNRAS, 447, 747 —. 2015b, MNRAS, 447, 747, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2396

    doi

  89. [98]

    2023, MNRAS, 519, 1409, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3621

    Lu, W., Fuller, J., Quataert, E., & Bonnerot, C. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 1409, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3621

    2023 doi

  90. [99]

    2016, MNRAS, 458, 3060, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw475

    Luo, L., Katz, B., & Dong, S. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 3060, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw475

    2016 doi

  91. [100]

    Mandel, I., & De Mink, S. E. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 2634

    2016

  92. [101]

    2024, ARA&A, 62, 21, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-052722-105936

    Marchant, P., & Bodensteiner, J. 2024, ARA&A, 62, 21, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-052722-105936

    2024 doi

  93. [102]

    M., & Moriya, T

    Marchant, P., Langer, N., Podsiadlowski, P., Tauris, T. M., & Moriya, T. J. 2016, A&A, 588, A50

    2016

  94. [103]

    2024, A&A, 691, A339, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348190

    Marchant, P., Podsiadlowski, P., & Mandel, I. 2024, A&A, 691, A339, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348190

    2024 doi

  95. [104]

    A., & Aarseth, S

    Mardling, R. A., & Aarseth, S. J. 2001, MNRAS, 321, 398

    2001

  96. [105]

    Martinez, M. A. S., Rodriguez, C. L., & Fragione, G. 2022, ApJ, 937, 78, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8d55

    2022 doi

  97. [106]

    2006, ApJL, 649, L103, doi: 10.1086/508328

    Martins, F., Trippe, S., Paumard, T., et al. 2006, ApJL, 649, L103, doi: 10.1086/508328

    2006 doi

  98. [107]

    McKernan, B., Ford, K. E. S., Callister, T., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 3886, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1570

    2022 doi

  99. [108]

    McKernan, B., Ford, K. E. S., Cook, H. E., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.16515, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.16515

    2024 doi arXiv

  100. [109]

    McKernan, B., Ford, K. E. S., Lyra, W., & Perets, H. B. 2012, MNRAS, 425, 460, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21486.x

    2012

  101. [110]

    P., Paprocki, M., et al

    Meurer, A., Smith, C. P., Paprocki, M., et al. 2017, PeerJ Computer Science, 3, e103

    2017

  102. [111]

    Meurs, E. J. A., & van den Heuvel, E. P. J. 1989, A&A, 226, 88 20

    1989

  103. [112]

    Michaely, E., & Perets, H. B. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 4924, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2720

    2020 doi

  104. [113]

    C., & Hamilton, D

    Miller, M. C., & Hamilton, D. P. 2002, ApJ, 576, 894

    2002

  105. [114]

    C., & Lauburg, V

    Miller, M. C., & Lauburg, V. M. 2009, ApJ, 692, 917

    2009

  106. [115]

    C., Michaely, E., et al

    Naoz, S., Rose, S. C., Michaely, E., et al. 2022, ApJL, 927, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac574b

    2022 doi

  107. [116]

    2020, A&A Rv, 28, 4, doi: 10.1007/s00159-020-00125-0

    Neumayer, N., Seth, A., & B¨ oker, T. 2020, A&A Rv, 28, 4, doi: 10.1007/s00159-020-00125-0

    2020 doi

  108. [117]

    Offner, S. S. R., Moe, M., Kratter, K. M., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 275, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.10066 O’leary, R. M., Rasio, F. A....

    2023 doi arXiv

  109. [118]

    2024, A&A, 689, A305, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450480

    Olejak, A., Klencki, J., Xu, X.-T., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A305, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450480

    2024 doi

  110. [119]

    2012, ApJ, 760, 90, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/760/1/90

    Passy, J.-C., Herwig, F., & Paxton, B. 2012, ApJ, 760, 90, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/760/1/90

    2012 doi

  111. [120]

    2015, MNRAS, 449, 4415, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv619

    Pavlovskii, K., & Ivanova, N. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 4415, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv619

    2015 doi

  112. [121]

    2011, ApJS, 192, 3, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3

    Paxton, B., Bildsten, L., Dotter, A., et al. 2011, ApJS, 192, 3, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/192/1/3

    2011 doi

  113. [122]

    2013, ApJS, 208, 4, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4

    Paxton, B., Cantiello, M., Arras, P., et al. 2013, ApJS, 208, 4, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/208/1/4

    2013 doi

  114. [123]

    2015, ApJS, 220, 15, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15

    Paxton, B., Marchant, P., Schwab, J., et al. 2015, ApJS, 220, 15, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15

    2015 doi

  115. [124]

    B., et al

    Paxton, B., Schwab, J., Bauer, E. B., et al. 2018, ApJS, 234, 34, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aaa5a8

    2018 doi

  116. [125]

    2019, ApJS, 243, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab2241

    Paxton, B., Smolec, R., Schwab, J., et al. 2019, ApJS, 243, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab2241

    2019 doi

  117. [126]

    G., Aerts, C., P´ apics, P

    Pedersen, M. G., Aerts, C., P´ apics, P. I., et al. 2021, Nature Astronomy, 5, 715, doi: 10.1038/s41550-021-01351-x Peißker, F., Zajaˇ cek, M., Labadie, L., et al. 2024, Nature Communications, 15, 10608, doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-54748-3

    2021 doi

  118. [127]

    Peters, P. C. 1964, Phys. Rev., 136, B1224

    1964

  119. [128]

    2014, ApJ, 782, 101, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/782/2/101

    Pfuhl, O., Alexander, T., Gillessen, S., et al. 2014, ApJ, 782, 101, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/782/2/101

    2014 doi

  120. [129]

    2003, MNRAS, 341, 385 Portegies Zwart, S

    Podsiadlowski, P., Rappaport, S., & Han, Z. 2003, MNRAS, 341, 385 Portegies Zwart, S. F., & McMillan, S. L. W. 2000, ApJL, 528, L17, doi: 10.1086/312422

    2003 doi

  121. [130]

    D., & Shapiro, S

    Quinlan, G. D., & Shapiro, S. L. 1989, ApJ, 343, 725, doi: 10.1086/167745 Racine, ´E. 2008, PhRvD, 78, 044021, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.78.044021

    1989 doi

  122. [131]

    2018, ApJ, 853, 93

    Randall, L., & Xianyu, Z.-Z. 2018, ApJ, 853, 93

    2018

  123. [132]

    P., & Tremaine, S

    Rauch, K. P., & Tremaine, S. 1996, NewA, 1, 149, doi: 10.1016/S1384-1076(96)00012-7

    1996 doi

  124. [133]

    2021, ApJ, 923, 277, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac29c5

    Renzo, M., & G¨ otberg, Y. 2021, ApJ, 923, 277, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac29c5

    2021 doi

  125. [134]

    2024, AJ, 167, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad1bed

    Rice, M., Gerbig, K., & Vanderburg, A. 2024, AJ, 167, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ad1bed

    2024 doi

  126. [135]

    2021, MNRAS, 505, 663

    Riley, J., Mandel, I., Marchant, P., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 663

    2021

  127. [136]

    W., et al

    Riley, J., Agrawal, P., Barrett, J. W., et al. 2022, ApJS, 258, 34, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac416c

    2022 doi

  128. [137]

    Rasio, F. A. 2018, PhRvL, 120, 151101

    2018

  129. [138]

    L., Chatterjee, S., & Rasio, F

    Rodriguez, C. L., Chatterjee, S., & Rasio, F. A. 2016, PhRvD, 93, 084029

    2016

  130. [139]

    L., Morscher, M., Pattabiraman, B., et al

    Rodriguez, C. L., Morscher, M., Pattabiraman, B., et al. 2015, PhRvL, 115, 051101

    2015

  131. [140]

    C., Naoz, S., Gautam, A

    Rose, S. C., Naoz, S., Gautam, A. K., et al. 2020, ApJ, 904, 113, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc557

    2020 doi

  132. [141]

    P., B¨ oker, T., et al

    Rossa, J., van der Marel, R. P., B¨ oker, T., et al. 2006, AJ, 132, 1074, doi: 10.1086/505968

    2006 doi

  133. [142]

    2023, MNRAS, 524, 2770, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1926

    Rowan, C., Boekholt, T., Kocsis, B., & Haiman, Z. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 2770, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1926

    2023 doi

  134. [143]

    Samsing, J., & D’Orazio, D. J. 2018, MNRAS, 481, 5445

    2018

  135. [144]

    2017, ApJL, 840, L14

    Samsing, J., & Ramirez-Ruiz, E. 2017, ApJL, 840, L14

    2017

  136. [145]

    2022, Nature, 603, 237

    Samsing, J., Bartos, I., D’Orazio, D., et al. 2022, Nature, 603, 237

    2022

  137. [146]

    2023, PhRvD, 108, 083033, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.083033

    Santini, A., Gerosa, D., Cotesta, R., & Berti, E. 2023, PhRvD, 108, 083033, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.108.083033

    2023 doi

  138. [147]

    Schawinski, K., Koss, M., Berney, S., & Sartori, L. F. 2015, MNRAS, 451, 2517, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1136

    2015 doi

  139. [148]

    2015, PhRvD, 91, 024043

    Schmidt, P., Ohme, F., & Hannam, M. 2015, PhRvD, 91, 024043

    2015

  140. [149]

    Schneider, F. R. N., Izzard, R. G., Langer, N., & Mink, S. E. d. 2015, ApJ, 805, 20, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/20

    2015 doi

  141. [150]

    Schnittman, J. D. 2004, PhRvD, 70, 124020, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.70.124020 Sch¨ odel, R., Nogueras-Lara, F., Gallego-Cano, E., et al. 2020, A&A, 641, A102, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936688 Sch¨ urmann, C., & Langer, N. 2024, A&A, 691, A174, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450354

    2004 doi

  142. [151]

    2019, ApJ, 878, 85, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab20ca

    Secunda, A., Bellovary, J., Mac Low, M.-M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 878, 85, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab20ca

    2019 doi

  143. [152]

    2017, ApJ, 836, 39

    Silsbee, K., & Tremaine, S. 2017, ApJ, 836, 39

    2017

  144. [153]

    2014, ARA&A, 52, 487, doi: https: //doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040025

    Smith, N. 2014, ARA&A, 52, 487, doi: https: //doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-040025

    2014 doi

  145. [154]

    E., Phinney, E

    Soberman, G. E., Phinney, E. S., & van den Heuvel, E. P. J. 1997, A&A, 327, 620, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9703016 21

    1997 doi arXiv

  146. [155]

    2021, PhRvD, 103, 063032, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.063032

    Steinle, N., & Kesden, M. 2021, PhRvD, 103, 063032, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.063032

    2021 doi

  147. [156]

    P., Naoz, S., Ghez, A

    Stephan, A. P., Naoz, S., Ghez, A. M., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 3494, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1220

    2016 doi

  148. [157]

    C., Metzger, B

    Stone, N. C., Metzger, B. D., & Haiman, Z. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 946, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw2260

    2017 doi

  149. [158]

    2024, ApJ, 971, 139

    Su, Y., Liu, B., & Xu, S. 2024, ApJ, 971, 139

    2024

  150. [159]

    2020, ApJ, 898, 25

    Tagawa, H., Haiman, Z., & Kocsis, B. 2020, ApJ, 898, 25

    2020

  151. [160]

    2023, A&A, 669, A45, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244137

    Toonen, S. 2023, A&A, 669, A45, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244137

    2023 doi

  152. [161]

    2020, A&A, 637, A60, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037452

    Tkachenko, A., Pavlovski, K., Johnston, C., et al. 2020, A&A, 637, A60, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202037452

    2020 doi

  153. [162]

    2024, MNRAS, 532, 4826, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1798

    Toyouchi, D., Hotokezaka, K., Inayoshi, K., & Kuiper, R. 2024, MNRAS, 532, 4826, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1798

    2024 doi

  154. [163]

    2023, MNRAS, 522, 937, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1029

    Tremaine, S. 2023, MNRAS, 522, 937, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1029

    2023 doi

  155. [164]

    2009, AJ, 137, 3706, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/137/3/3706

    Tremaine, S., Touma, J., & Namouni, F. 2009, AJ, 137, 3706, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/137/3/3706

    2009 doi

  156. [165]

    2002, ApJ, 574, 740, doi: 10.1086/341002 van Son, L

    Tremaine, S., Gebhardt, K., Bender, R., et al. 2002, ApJ, 574, 740, doi: 10.1086/341002 van Son, L. A. C., de Mink, S. E., Renzo, M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 940, 184, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac9b0a Vigna-G´ omez, A., Willcox, R., Tamborra, I., et al. 2024, PhRvL, 132, 191403, doi: 1...

    2002 doi

  157. [166]

    J., Vigna-G´ omez, A., et al

    Vinciguerra, S., Neijssel, C. J., Vigna-G´ omez, A., et al. 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 498, 4705, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2177

    2020 doi

  158. [167]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261

    2020

  159. [168]

    2022, A&A, 668, L2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245084 von Zeipel, H

    Vitale, S., Biscoveanu, S., & Talbot, C. 2022, A&A, 668, L2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245084 von Zeipel, H. 1910, Astronomische Nachrichten, 183, 345

    2022 doi

  160. [169]

    Bellinger, E. P. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 4146, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2540

    2022 doi

  161. [170]

    2021, ApJL, 923, L23, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac400a

    Wang, Y.-H., McKernan, B., Ford, S., et al. 2021, ApJL, 923, L23, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac400a

    2021 doi

  162. [171]

    2024, MNRAS, 531, 4656, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1430

    Whitehead, H., Rowan, C., Boekholt, T., & Kocsis, B. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 4656, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1430

    2024 doi

  163. [172]

    Will, C. M. 2017, PhRvD, 96, 023017, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.96.023017 —. 2021, PhRvD, 103, 063003, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.103.063003

    2017 doi

  164. [173]

    2024, ApJ, 973, 53, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad61e1

    Hamilton, C. 2024, ApJ, 973, 53, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad61e1

    2024 doi

  165. [174]

    2003, ApJ, 589, 605, doi: 10.1086/374598

    Wu, Y., & Murray, N. 2003, ApJ, 589, 605, doi: 10.1086/374598

    2003 doi

  166. [175]

    2020, PhRvD, 102, 123009, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.123009

    Yu, H., Ma, S., Giesler, M., & Chen, Y. 2020, PhRvD, 102, 123009, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.102.123009

    2020 doi

  167. [176]

    S., Berry, C

    Zevin, M., Bavera, S. S., Berry, C. P. L., et al. 2021, ApJ, 910, 152, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe40e

    2021 doi

  168. [177]

    M., Mapelli, M., Branchesi, M., & Tormen, G

    Ziosi, B. M., Mapelli, M., Branchesi, M., & Tormen, G. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 3703

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.