pith. sign in

arxiv: 2211.12484 · v2 · pith:VS4C3WCOnew · submitted 2022-11-22 · ⚛️ physics.chem-ph · cond-mat.mtrl-sci

How to validate machine-learned interatomic potentials

classification ⚛️ physics.chem-ph cond-mat.mtrl-sci
keywords potentialsvalidationmaterialsphysicallyaccuracyagnosticapproachesarises
0
0 comments X
read the original abstract

Machine learning (ML) approaches enable large-scale atomistic simulations with near-quantum-mechanical accuracy. With the growing availability of these methods there arises a need for careful validation, particularly for physically agnostic models - that is, for potentials which extract the nature of atomic interactions from reference data. Here, we review the basic principles behind ML potentials and their validation for atomic-scale materials modeling. We discuss best practice in defining error metrics based on numerical performance as well as physically guided validation. We give specific recommendations that we hope will be useful for the wider community, including those researchers who intend to use ML potentials for materials "off the shelf".

This paper has not been read by Pith yet.

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.