Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 244 references

Further evidence for natal kick segregation by spectral type in high-mass X-ray binaries

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-15 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Supernova kicks split X-ray binaries at 40 km/s

desk verdict Solid incremental confirmation of the Be/Sg velocity segregation, but the headline significance test rests on an under-tested isotropy correction and the abstract overstates robustness. read the letter →

arxiv 2509.10221 v1 pith:VTYTQPVM submitted 2025-09-12 astro-ph.HE

classification astro-ph.HE
keywords high-massX-raybinariesnatalkickspeculiarvelocitiesGaiaDR3Be/X-raysupergiantbinarypopulationsynthesisCorbetdiagram
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tests whether the supernova that forms the compact object in a high-mass X-ray binary leaves a measurable imprint on the system's space velocity, and claims that it does. Using Gaia DR3 astrometry for 63 systems, it finds that Be/X-ray binaries mostly move slower than about 40 km/s relative to Galactic rotation, while supergiant X-ray binaries mostly move faster. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test rejects a common parent distribution in all 1,000 Monte Carlo ensembles, and the split persists when only systems with measured radial velocities are used. If right, peculiar velocity becomes a complementary fingerprint for classifying HMXBs and a new observational constraint on natal kick models.

What carries the argument

The argument turns on the peculiar velocity $V_{\rm pec}$, the system's three-dimensional motion after removing solar motion and circular Galactic rotation, computed from Gaia DR3 parallaxes and proper motions together with literature systemic radial velocities. For the 35 systems without radial velocities, the paper assumes isotropic peculiar motions and converts the two-dimensional sky velocity to a three-dimensional speed with the factor $4/\pi$, the expected ratio of 3D to 2D speeds under isotropy. The 40 km/s threshold is the velocity at which the two classes' cumulative distributions separate most cleanly. Binary population synthesis supplies the physical interpretation by matching simulated binaries to observed properties and inferring pre-supernova orbital periods and fractional mass losses.

What would settle it

Measure full three-dimensional peculiar velocities for the 35 HMXBs currently lacking systemic radial velocities, for example with time-series spectroscopy of their companion stars, and re-run the K-S test; if the Be and supergiant distributions no longer separate near 40 km/s, the segregation is an artifact of the isotropy assumption.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a clean kinematic segregation in the peculiar velocities of Galactic high-mass X-ray binaries: BeXRBs cluster below about 40 km/s, SgXRBs above, and the two cumulative distributions are maximally separated near that threshold. A K-S test rejects a common parent distribution in 100 per cent of 1,000 Monte Carlo ensembles, and the difference remains when only the 28 systems with measured systemic radial velocities are considered. Binary population synthesis with the cosmic code shows SgXRBs preferentially come from pre-supernova binaries with shorter orbital periods (mean about 4 days) and higher fractional mass loss (mean about 0.5) than BeXRBs (about 172 days and 0.3, respectively), matching the prediction of van den Heuvel et al. (2000). These findings extend the Hipparcos-era two-dimensional result to full three-dimensional kinematics.

Load-bearing premise

The result hinges on the assumption that HMXB peculiar motions are isotropic, which lets the authors turn two-dimensional sky speeds into three-dimensional space speeds for 35 of 63 systems; if the unmeasured motions are actually directional, those velocities would be biased and the 40 km/s class split could be an artifact.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Peculiar velocity can serve as a complementary classification feature: unclassified HMXBs moving slower than about 40 km/s are likely BeXRBs, while faster systems are likely SgXRBs.
  • The class difference supports a natal-kick origin: SgXRBs' tighter pre-supernova orbits and higher fractional mass loss naturally produce larger systemic velocities.
  • The result validates using Gaia astrometry plus the isotropic $4/\pi$ correction to recover three-dimensional kinematics when radial velocities are missing.
  • Population synthesis models of HMXBs should reproduce short pre-supernova periods and high mass loss for supergiant progenitors, adding a new matching constraint.
  • The fast BeXRB outlier RX J1826.2–1450/LS 5039 shows the 40 km/s split is statistical rather than absolute, flagging special evolutionary paths.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If faster SgXRBs travel farther from their birth sites, the model predicts a larger Galactic scale height and wider spatial spread for SgXRBs than BeXRBs; this spatial prediction is not made in the paper but should be testable with the same sample.
  • The 40 km/s split might also classify HMXBs in external galaxies where only proper motions or radial velocities are available, provided the same kick physics applies.
  • If future radial-velocity campaigns confirm the isotropy assumption, the $4/\pi$ correction could be applied to much larger HMXB samples, turning proper-motion surveys into three-dimensional kinematic censuses.
  • The fast BeXRB outlier LS 5039, noted by the paper as a possible triple, suggests dynamical interactions can mimic or exceed natal kicks; checking multiplicity among high-peculiar-velocity BeXRBs would test that channel.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper compiles 63 Galactic HMXBs with Gaia DR3 astrometry, applies zero-point-corrected parallaxes and distance inversion, and combines proper motions with literature systemic radial velocities for 28 systems to compute 3D peculiar velocities. For the 35 systems without measured Vr, it assumes isotropic peculiar motions and multiplies the 2D sky velocity by 4/pi. The authors report mean Vpec of about 21 km/s for BeXRBs and 58 km/s for SgXRBs, and an ensemble Kolmogorov-Smirnov test that rejects a common parent distribution in 100% of 1,000 Monte Carlo draws, with an optimal separation threshold near 40 km/s. They further use COSMIC/BSE population synthesis to argue that SgXRBs have shorter pre-supernova orbital periods and higher fractional mass loss than BeXRBs, and propose Vpec as a complementary classifier for HMXBs.

Significance. If the kinematic segregation is robust, this is a valuable three-dimensional confirmation and extension of the earlier Hipparcos-based result (Chevalier & Ilovaisky 1998), and it provides an observational probe of natal kicks in HMXBs. The paper is careful in several respects: parallax zero-point corrections, Monte Carlo propagation of astrometric and Galactic-constant uncertainties, an ensemble K-S procedure rather than a single-point comparison, and explicit sample-selection checks via colour-magnitude diagrams and K-S tests against the XRBcats parent sample. The population-synthesis link is suggestive but is presented as preliminary and needs strengthening before it can carry the causal interpretation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 4; Section 6.2, Table 4] The headline K-S rejection in Section 5 is not shown to be independent of the isotropic 4/pi correction, because the correction is applied unevenly: 22 of 34 BeXRBs but only 6 of 16 SgXRBs enter the comparison through V_iso. The validation of the isotropy ansatz in Section 6.2 is only marginal in the UV plane (K-S p = 0.06, Table 4), which is the plane most relevant to the sky projection used for disc sources. Figure 3 shows the restricted measured-Vr subset only qualitatively, and no K-S rejection fraction is reported for that subset. Please report the ensemble K-S result restricted to the measured-Vr Be/Sg systems, and quantify how the rejection fraction changes if the V_iso systems are excluded or if their Vpec is modelled with an anisotropic velocity distribution calibrated to the UV-plane discrepancy.
  2. [Abstract; Section 5; Section 7(iii)] The abstract claims rejection 'irrespective of the background stellar velocity dispersion', but no quantitative test varying the assumed background dispersion is presented. Section 5 only cites a typical 20 km/s young-disk dispersion, and Section 7(iii) states that accounting for background scatter 'is expected to moderate' the estimates without demonstration. Because the paper itself notes in Section 4 that true space velocities require knowledge of birth sites, the robustness claim needs a concrete test, for example convolving the Vpec distributions with Gaussians of increasing dispersion and tracking the K-S rejection fraction, or a justification that all sample members belong to young populations with known small dispersions.
  3. [Section 6.3, Fig. 10] The population-synthesis interpretation is load-bearing for the causal claim in the title, but as presented it is preliminary: the simulations are described as part of upcoming work (Dashwood Brown et al., in preparation), the matching criteria and kick prescriptions are only summarized, and Figure 10 shows separated means (4.0 vs 172.5 days; 0.5 vs 0.3 fractional mass loss) without uncertainties or significance tests. Please either provide the quantitative support, including the simulated Vpec distributions and tests against the observed ones, or explicitly reframe these results as a tentative explanation rather than a demonstrated origin of the kinematic segregation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 7(iii) vs. Section 5] Section 7(iii) gives mean Vpec values of 20.2 and 48.9 km/s for BeXRBs and SgXRBs, while Section 5 reports 20.9 ± 3.5 and 58.0 ± 6.6 km/s; these numbers should be reconciled.
  2. [Section 7(i) vs. Section 2] Summary item (i) says a search was conducted within a 0.5 arcsec radius, but Section 2 describes a 5 arcsec search radius; the inconsistency should be corrected.
  3. [Section 6.3; Section 7(ix); Fig. 14] There are several typographical errors: 'Kinemetic' in the Section 6.3 heading, 'segration' in summary item (ix), and 'margenta' in the Fig. 14 caption.
  4. [Section 5, Figs. 3 and 4] The statement that Figs. 3 and 4 'clearly demonstrate a significant difference in the mean velocities' overstates what histograms alone show; the ensemble K-S test in the following paragraph is the appropriate statistical evidence and should be cited as such.
  5. [Table 2, 4U 2206+543] Two radial velocity values are listed for 4U 2206+543 (-62.7 and -54.5 ± 1.0 km/s) without stating which one was adopted in the kinematic analysis; please specify the adopted value and reference.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: V_pec is measured from external Gaia astrometry and literature radial velocities; the 4/pi isotropy correction and population-synthesis inferences are model assumptions, not inputs recycled as predictions.

full rationale

No load-bearing step in this paper reduces to its own inputs. The central V_pec values are derived from Gaia DR3 parallaxes and proper motions plus literature systemic radial velocities, with spectral classifications taken from external catalogues; the class comparison is therefore an external measurement, not a self-defined quantity. The 4/pi correction applied to the 35 systems without measured V_r is a fixed theoretical expectation (Hobbs et al. 2005), not a parameter fitted to the Be/Sg difference, and the paper tests the isotropy ansatz on the 28 systems with measured V_r (Table 4). The UV-plane p-value of 0.06 and the class imbalance in the use of V_iso are legitimate validity and robustness concerns, but they do not make the claimed K-S separation true by construction. Similarly, the binary population-synthesis section matches observed component masses, orbital periods, and V_pec to select simulations, then reads off pre-SN orbital periods and fractional mass loss; those inferred quantities are not the inputs to the kinematic claim, so this is model-dependent interpretation rather than circularity. Self-citations to Zhao et al. (2023), Gandhi et al. (2020), and Dashwood Brown et al. (2024) provide methodological context and are not the load-bearing derivation. No circular step is exhibited, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The observational analysis is data-driven and uses standard astrometric and Galactic-rotation inputs, so the free-parameter count is low. The most consequential modeling assumption is isotropy for the 35 systems lacking radial velocities, which is validated only on the 28-system subset with one marginal plane. The population synthesis adds several standard but unverified evolutionary assumptions.

free parameters (2)
  • Vpec separation threshold = 40 km/s
    Chosen post hoc as the optimal separation between the BeXRB and SgXRB cumulative distributions in the same sample (Section 5, Fig. 5); the paper then proposes it as a classification rule for unclassified HMXBs, which is an in-sample calibration.
  • Additional log Vpec scatter for systems without radial velocities = 0.18 dex
    Added in quadrature to Vpec for systems without radial velocities; determined from simulations of isotropically distributed velocities (Section 4). It is a model-derived uncertainty term included in the final error bars.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Gaia DR3 parallaxes, after zero-point correction and a <20% fractional error cut, provide unbiased distances through inversion.
    Bailer-Jones (2015) paradigm invoked in Section 3; the cut at 20% reduces the sample from 110 to 63 systems.
  • domain assumption The adopted Galactic rotation curve and solar motion (Reid et al. 2009; Kawata et al. 2019) correctly describe the background motion of the disc.
    Used to convert observed motions to peculiar velocities in Section 4; uncertainties on these constants are included in the Monte Carlo.
  • domain assumption Peculiar velocities for the 35 systems without radial velocities are isotropically distributed, so the 3D speed equals 4/pi times the 2D sky speed.
    Stated in Section 4 and tested in Section 6.2 on the 28 systems with radial velocities; the UV plane test is marginal (p=0.06).
  • domain assumption The Gaia single-star astrometric solution traces the systemic motion of each binary.
    The paper checks RUWE and astrometric excess noise (Section 5) and finds no systematic trends, but binarity is a known source of astrometric perturbation.
  • domain assumption For population synthesis, the delayed supernova mechanism (Fryer et al. 2012), Vink et al. (2001) wind prescriptions, and the COSMIC/BSE framework correctly model HMXB progenitors.
    Used in Section 6.3 to infer pre-SN orbital periods and fractional mass loss; results are described as preliminary and sensitive to the natal kick prescriptions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Further evidence for natal kick segregation by spectral type in high-mass X-ray binaries." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VTYTQPVM

@misc{pith2026250910221,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Further evidence for natal kick segregation by spectral type in high-mass X-ray binaries},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VTYTQPVM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2509.10221}
}
abstract

High-mass X-ray binaries (HMXBs) are systems in which a neutron star or black hole accretes material from a massive companion. HMXBs are expected to have experienced a supernova in their evolution. The impulsive kick associated with this event should affect the space velocity of the system in a way that depends on the nature and state of the progenitor binary. Here, we test whether the different evolutionary histories of HMXBs have left a detectable imprint on their peculiar velocities ($V_{\rm pec}$). Using data from Gaia Data Release 3 (Gaia DR3), we first calculate the $V_{\rm pec}$ values for 63 well-known HMXBs hosting a black hole or neutron star and estimate the associated uncertainties via Monte Carlo re-sampling. We then analyse their distribution and check for differences between classes. Overall, $V_{\rm pec}$ estimates extend up to 100 km s$^{-1}$, but with Be/X-ray binaries (BeXRBs) favouring $V_{\rm pec}$ $\lesssim 40$ km s$^{-1}$ and supergiant X-ray binaries (SgXRBs) favouring $V_{\rm pec}$ $\gtrsim 40$ km s$^{-1}$. Based on a Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) test, the null hypothesis that the peculiar velocities of both classes are drawn from the same parent distribution can be robustly rejected, irrespective of the background stellar velocity dispersion. Tests with binary population synthesis demonstrate that SgXRBs typically have shorter orbital periods and higher fractional mass loss than BeXRBs at supernova. We argue that the magnitude of $V_{\rm pec}$ could be used as a complementary feature to distinguish between Be and supergiant systems. These findings extend previous inferences based on two-dimensional kinematics from Hipparcos, and may be explained by the differing nature of the respective progenitors systems between the source classes at the instant of supernova.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2509.10221 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Comparison of Gaia DR3 distances (𝑟Gaia ) with literature estimates (𝑟lit) for our HMXBs, where known. The dotted line denotes the equality relation 𝑟lit = 𝑟Gaia . Symbols represent different spectral classes. Sources scatter around the equality relation, and there is no obvious bias as a function of spectral class. et al. 1985), implying that the velocities we derive may not precisely represent their true three-dim… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Summed distributions of 𝑉pec for BeXRBs (blue, right-angled hatching ‘/’) and SgXRBs (red, left-handed hatching ‘\’; colours online). Only systems with available 𝑉r values are included here. For each source, 50,000 random samples are drawn. The BeXRBs system with the highest 𝑉pec velocity is RX J1826.2–1450/LS 5039 – its distribution stands out from its subgroup on the far right. Similarly, Cyg X–1 is the SgXRB with… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Highest-density (68.27 per cent) intervals of 𝑉pec for 63 HMXBs. Source names are annotated on the left. Sources are sorted by 𝑉pec in ascend￾ing order from the bottom, and are colour-coded by HMXB class. all systems. These distributions, categorised by their respective sub￾groups, are presented in Appendix [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Histogram of 𝑉pec values as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Cumulative distribution of 𝑉pec for BeXRBs (blue) and SgXRBs (red). Roughly half of the BeXRBs have 𝑉pec lower than 20 km s−1 , with nearly all of them being slower than 30 km s−1 . In contrast, around half of SgXRBs have 𝑉pec ≤ 50 km s−1 . The two subgroups are optima…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The Corbet diagram (colours online) plotting spin vs. orbital period for HMXBs in this study; different systems are further distinguished by the colour of the crosses: blue, BeXRBs; red, SgXRBs; Magenta, unclear classes; yellow, RLOs. The 𝑉pec values are mapped to the …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: The relationship between total mass (𝑀tot) and 𝑉pec for NS HMXBs, including their associated uncertainties. Systems are distinguished by cross colour according to sub-classes: blue for BeXRBs, red for SgXRBs, green for SyXRBs, magenta for unclear classifications, and y…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: We also tested the differences between the theoretical predic￾tion and our estimated values using the K-S test. For the UW and VW planes, the test results indicate strong consistency between em￾pirical data and simulations. However, for the UV plane, the K–S test yield…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: A map of the Galactic plane with the projected locations of 63 HMXBs, incorporating their distance uncertainties accounted for through error propagation (Milky Way image courtesy of NASA/JPL-Caltech, ESO, J. Hurt). The blue dots represent BeXRBs, red dots represent SgX…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: The relationship between pre-SN orbital period and fractional mass loss, based on our binary population synthesis simulations. Systems are distinguished by colour according to sub-classes: blue for BeXRBs, red for SgXRBs. Individual systems are annotated with their co…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: The colour-magnitude diagram (CMD) for HMXBs, where our targets are shown as filled symbols and XRBcats (Neumann et al. 2023) as unfilled symbols. Sub-groups are represented as follows: circles for BeXRBs, triangles for SgXRBs, plus signs for unclear classifications, …
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Individual posterior distributions of 𝑉pec for BeXRBs (blue) and SgXRBs (red). Only systems with available 𝑉r values are included here. For each source, 50,000 random samples are drawn. triple systems are not expected to significantly contribute to the high-velocity r…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Individual probability distributions of 𝑉pec for BeXRBs (blue) and SgXRBs (red). Systems with assumed 𝑉r values using the isotropic assumption are included here. For each source, 50,000 random samples were drawn for plotting the probability distribution. 7.1.2 SyXRBs …
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Individual probability distributions of 𝑉pec for RLOs (yellow), SyXRBs (green) and unclear classes (margenta). Systems with assumed 𝑉r values using isotropic assumption are included here. For each source, 50,000 random samples are drawn. not to adopt this 𝑉r value. In…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

244 extracted references · 84 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    A., Bautz L

    Abt H. A., Bautz L. P., 1963, @doi [ ] 10.1086/147701 , 138, 1002

  2. [2]

    K., Antokhina E

    Abubekerov M. K., Antokhina E. A., Cherepashchuk A. M., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1134/1.1648072 , 48, 89

  3. [3]

    Aleksić J., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201424879 , 576, A36

  4. [4]

    An H., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/806/2/166 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...806..166A 806, 166

  5. [5]

    Ankay A., Kaper L., de Bruijne J. H. J., Dewi J., Hoogerwerf R., Savonije G. J., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20010192 , 370, 170

  6. [6]

    V., Grundstrom E

    Aragona C., McSwain M. V., Grundstrom E. D., Marsh A. N., Roettenbacher R. M., Hessler K. M., Boyajian T. S., Ray P. S., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/698/1/514 , 698, 514

  7. [7]

    V., De Becker M., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/306 , 724, 306

    Aragona C., McSwain M. V., De Becker M., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/306 , 724, 306

  8. [8]

    Arras P., Lai D., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevD.60.043001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999PhRvD..60d3001A 60, 043001

Show all 244 references
  1. [9]

    Atri P., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz2335 , 489, 3116

  2. [10]

    A., Shaw A

    Bahramian A., Kennea J. A., Shaw A. W., 2017, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ATel10866....1B 10866, 1

  3. [11]

    Bailer-Jones C. A. L., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1086/683116 , 127, 994

  4. [12]

    A., Borisov N

    Barsukova E. A., Borisov N. V., Burenkov A. N., Klochkova V. G., Goranskij V. P., Metlova N. V., 2005, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005ATel..416....1B 416, 1

  5. [13]

    J., Swank J., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/317320 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...544L.129B 544, L129

    Baykal A., Stark M. J., Swank J., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/317320 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...544L.129B 544, L129

  6. [14]

    C ., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20052968 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...439.1131B 439, 1131

    Baykal A., K z lo g lu \"U ., K z lo g lu N., Balman S ., Inam S. C ., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20052968 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...439.1131B 439, 1131

  7. [15]

    H., Swank J

    Becker R. H., Swank J. H., Boldt E. A., Holt S. S., Pravdo S. H., Saba J. R., Serlemitsos P. J., 1977, @doi [ ] 10.1086/182498 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977ApJ...216L..11B 216, L11

  8. [16]

    Belokurov V., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1522 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.496.1922B 496, 1922

  9. [17]

    F., et al., 2017, @doi [Astronomy Letters] 10.1134/S1063773717100012 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AstL...43..664B 43, 664

    Bikmaev I. F., et al., 2017, @doi [Astronomy Letters] 10.1134/S1063773717100012 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017AstL...43..664B 43, 664

  10. [18]

    J., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0067-0049/223/1/15 , 223, 15

    Bird A. J., et al., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.3847/0067-0049/223/1/15 , 223, 15

  11. [19]

    Blaauw A., 1961, , 15, 265

  12. [20]

    J., Corbet R

    Blay P., Negueruela I., Reig P., Coe M. J., Corbet R. H. D., Fabregat J., Tarasov A. E., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20053951 , 446, 1095

  13. [21]

    M., Bowler M

    Blundell K. M., Bowler M. G., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/426542 , 616, L159

  14. [22]

    M., Bowler M

    Blundell K. M., Bowler M. G., Schmidtobreick L., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/588027 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2008ApJ...678L..47B 678, L47

  15. [23]

    Bonnet-Bidaud J.-M., Mouchet M., 1998,

  16. [24]

    M., van der Klis M., 1981, , 101, 299

    Bonnet-Bidaud J. M., van der Klis M., 1981, , 101, 299

  17. [25]

    Bozzo E., Romano P., Ferrigno C., Oskinova L., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac907 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.513...42B 513, 42

  18. [26]

    Breivik K., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9d85 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...898...71B 898, 71

  19. [27]

    G., Dawson P

    Carlberg R. G., Dawson P. C., Hsu T., Vandenberg D. A., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1086/163337 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985ApJ...294..674C 294, 674

  20. [30]

    F., Rea N., eds, Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings Vol

    Casares J., et al., 2011, in Torres D. F., Rea N., eds, Astrophysics and Space Science Proceedings Vol. 21, High-Energy Emission from Pulsars and their Systems. pp 559--562 ( @eprint arXiv 1012.4351 ), @doi 10.1007/978-3-642-17251-9_46

  21. [31]

    M., Vilardell F., Negueruela I., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20368.x , 421, 1103

    Casares J., Ribó M., Ribas I., Paredes J. M., Vilardell F., Negueruela I., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.20368.x , 421, 1103

  22. [32]

    M., Herrero A., Simón-Díaz S., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature12916 , 505, 378

    Casares J., Negueruela I., Ribó M., Ribas I., Paredes J. M., Herrero A., Simón-Díaz S., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature12916 , 505, 378

  23. [33]

    A., 1998, , 330, 201

    Chevalier C., Ilovaisky S. A., 1998, , 330, 201

  24. [34]

    D., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aa64ce , 153, 174

    Chojnowski S. D., et al., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aa64ce , 153, 174

  25. [35]

    N., 1984, Soviet Astronomy Letters, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984SvAL...10...87C 10, 87

    Chugai N. N., 1984, Soviet Astronomy Letters, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984SvAL...10...87C 10, 87

  26. [36]

    W., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/421764 , 610, 956

    Clark G. W., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/421764 , 610, 956

  27. [37]

    S., et al., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20010919 , 376, 476

    Clark J. S., et al., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20010919 , 376, 476

  28. [39]

    Coe M., Everall C., Norton A., Roche P., Unger S., Fabregat J., Reglero V., Grunsfeld J., 1993, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/261.3.599 , 261, 599

  29. [40]

    J., et al., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/270.1.L57 , 270, L57

    Coe M. J., et al., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/270.1.L57 , 270, L57

  30. [41]

    J., Fabregat J., Negueruela I., Roche P., Steele I

    Coe M. J., Fabregat J., Negueruela I., Roche P., Steele I. A., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/281.1.333 , 281, 333

  31. [42]

    Coleiro A., Chaty S., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/764/2/185 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...764..185C 764, 185

  32. [43]

    Corbet R. H. D., 1986, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/220.4.1047 , 220, 1047

  33. [44]

    Corbet R. H. D., Krimm H. A., 2010, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ATel.3079....1C 3079, 1

  34. [45]

    Corbet R. H. D., Mason K. O., 1984, , 131, 385

  35. [46]

    Corbet R. H. D., Peele A. G., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1086/310972 , 489, L83

  36. [47]

    Corbet R. H. D., Peele A. G., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/312485 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...530L..33C 530, L33

  37. [48]

    Corbet R. H. D., Markwardt C. B., Tueller J., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/509319 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ApJ...655..458C 655, 458

  38. [49]

    B., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1086/159505 , 251, 604

    Crampton D., Hutchings J. B., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1086/159505 , 251, 604

  39. [50]

    B., Cowley A

    Crampton D., Hutchings J. B., Cowley A. P., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1086/163750 , 299, 839

  40. [51]

    C., Nicastro L., Sacco B., Kaaret P., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/312413 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...528L..25C 528, L25

    Cusumano G., Maccarone M. C., Nicastro L., Sacco B., Kaaret P., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/312413 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...528L..25C 528, L25

  41. [52]

    Cusumano G., Segreto A., La Parola V., Masetti N., D'Ai A., Tagliaferri G., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slt116 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.436L..74C 436, L74

  42. [53]

    Cusumano G., La Parola V., Segreto A., D'A \` A., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv2851 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.456.2717C 456, 2717

  43. [54]

    D'Odorico S., Oosterloo T., Zwitter T., Calvani M., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1038/353329a0 , 353, 329

  44. [55]

    Dashwood Brown C., Gandhi P., Zhao Y., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slad151 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527L..82D 527, L82

  45. [56]

    Davison P. J. N., Watson M. G., Pye J. P., 1977, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/181.1.73P , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1977MNRAS.181P..73D 181, 73

  46. [57]

    A., Soria R., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slad164 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.528L..38D 528, L38

    De K., Daly F. A., Soria R., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/slad164 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.528L..38D 528, L38

  47. [58]

    M., Pfahl E., Rappaport S

    Delgado-Martí H., Levine A. M., Pfahl E., Rappaport S. A., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/318236 , 546, 455

  48. [59]

    E., Berti E., Bulik T., Mandel I., O'Shaughnessy R., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/759/1/52 , 759, 52

    Dominik M., Belczynski K., Fryer C., Holz D. E., Berti E., Bulik T., Mandel I., O'Shaughnessy R., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/759/1/52 , 759, 52

  49. [60]

    F., Rodionov V

    Dorofeev O. F., Rodionov V. N., Ternov I. M., 1985, Soviet Astronomy Letters, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985SvAL...11..123D 11, 123

  50. [61]

    Doroshenko V., Tsygankov S., Santangelo A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201732208 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...613A..19D 613, A19

  51. [63]

    Ducci L., Doroshenko V., Suleimanov V., Nikołajuk M., Santangelo A., Ferrigno C., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628242 , 592, A58

  52. [64]

    Duflot M., Figon P., Meyssonnier N., 1995, , 114, 269

  53. [65]

    1997, The HIPPARCOS and TYCHO catalogues

    ESA ed. 1997, The HIPPARCOS and TYCHO catalogues. Astrometric and photometric star catalogues derived from the ESA HIPPARCOS Space Astrometry Mission ESA Special Publication Vol. 1200

  54. [66]

    Fabregat J., et al., 1992, , 259, 522

  55. [67]

    R., Oudmaijer R

    Fairlamb J. R., Oudmaijer R. D., Mendigut \' a I., Ilee J. D., van den Ancker M. E., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stv1576 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.453..976F 453, 976

  56. [68]

    M., Fetisova Y., Puls J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425191 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...577A.130F 577, A130

    Falanga M., Bozzo E., Lutovinov A., Bonnet-Bidaud J. M., Fetisova Y., Puls J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425191 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...577A.130F 577, A130

  57. [69]

    Ferrigno C., Farinelli R., Bozzo E., Pottschmidt K., Klochkov D., Kretschmar P., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201321053 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013A&A...553A.103F 553, A103

  58. [70]

    H., Ikhsanov N

    Finger M. H., Ikhsanov N. R., Wilson-Hodge C. A., Patel S. K., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/709/2/1249 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...709.1249F 709, 1249

  59. [71]

    Forman W., Jones C., Cominsky L., Julien P., Murray S., Peters G., Tananbaum H., Giacconi R., 1978, @doi [ ] 10.1086/190561 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1978ApJS...38..357F 38, 357

  60. [72]

    M., Antoniou V., Dubus G., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2308.02645 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv230802645F p

    Fornasini F. M., Antoniou V., Dubus G., 2023, @doi [arXiv e-prints] 10.48550/arXiv.2308.02645 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023arXiv230802645F p. arXiv:2308.02645

  61. [73]

    S., 2022,

    Fortin F., Garcia F., Chaty S., Chassande-Mottin E., Bunzel A. S., 2022,

  62. [74]

    Fortin F., Garc \' a F., Simaz Bunzel A., Chaty S., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245236 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...671A.149F 671, A149

  63. [75]

    A., Hjellming R

    Frail D. A., Hjellming R. M., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1086/115833 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991AJ....101.2126F 101, 2126

  64. [76]

    L., Kalogera V., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/321359 , 554, 548

    Fryer C. L., Kalogera V., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/321359 , 554, 548

  65. [77]

    L., Belczynski K., Wiktorowicz G., Dominik M., Kalogera V., Holz D

    Fryer C. L., Belczynski K., Wiktorowicz G., Dominik M., Kalogera V., Holz D. E., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/749/1/91 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012ApJ...749...91F 749, 91

  66. [78]

    Gaia Collaboration 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201629272 , 595, A1

  67. [79]

    Gaia Collaboration 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201832843 , 616, A10

  68. [80]

    Gaia Collaboration 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202243940 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...674A...1G 674, A1

  69. [82]

    H., Walborn N

    Gamen R., Barb \`a R. H., Walborn N. R., Morrell N. I., Arias J. I., Ma \' z Apell \'a niz J., Sota A., Alfaro E. J., 2015b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201527140 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...583L...4G 583, L4

  70. [83]

    Gandhi P., Rao A., Johnson M. A. C., Paice J. A., Maccarone T. J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stz438 , 485, 2642

  71. [84]

    A., Belczynski K., Maccarone T

    Gandhi P., Rao A., Charles P. A., Belczynski K., Maccarone T. J., Arur K., Corral-Santana J. M., 2020, @doi [ : Letters] 10.1093/mnrasl/slaa081 , 496, L22

  72. [85]

    Gandhi P., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab3771 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.510.3885G 510, 3885

  73. [86]

    R., Bolton C

    Gies D. R., Bolton C. T., 1982, @doi [ ] 10.1086/160250 , 260, 240

  74. [87]

    R., Bolton C

    Gies D. R., Bolton C. T., 1986, @doi [ ] 10.1086/191118 , 61, 419

  75. [88]

    R., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/345345 , 583, 424

    Gies D. R., et al., 2003, @doi [ ] 10.1086/345345 , 583, 424

  76. [89]

    R., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/586690 , 678, 1237

    Gies D. R., et al., 2008, @doi [ ] 10.1086/586690 , 678, 1237

  77. [90]

    González-Galán A., Negueruela I., Castro N., Simón-Díaz S., Lorenzo J., Vilardell F., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201423554 , 566, A131

  78. [91]

    N., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20035940 , 420, 589

    González-Riestra R., Oosterbroek T., Kuulkers E., Orr A., Parmar A. N., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20035940 , 420, 589

  79. [92]

    E., Bird A

    Goossens M. E., Bird A. J., Drave S. P., Bazzano A., Hill A. B., McBride V. A., Sguera V., Sidoli L., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stt1166 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.434.2182G 434, 2182

  80. [93]

    C., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/341257 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...575..427G 575, 427

    Gregory P. C., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/341257 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...575..427G 575, 427

  81. [94]

    S., Harnden Jr

    Grillo F., Sciortino S., Micela G., Vaiana G. S., Harnden Jr. F. R., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1086/191705 , 81, 795

  82. [95]

    Groenewegen M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202140862 , 654, A20

  83. [96]

    Gromadzki M., Miko ajewska J., Soszy \'n ski I., 2013, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.1312.6063 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013AcA....63..405G 63, 405

  84. [97]

    D., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/514325 , 660, 1398

    Grundstrom E. D., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/514325 , 660, 1398

  85. [98]

    H., Bolton C

    Grunhut J. H., Bolton C. T., McSwain M. V., 2014, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201322738 , 563, A1

  86. [99]

    Haberl F., Angelini L., Motch C., 1998, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998A&A...335..587H 335, 587

  87. [100]

    Hambaryan V., et al., 2022, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stac184 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.511.4123H 511, 4123

  88. [101]

    C., Gies D

    Hillwig T. C., Gies D. R., Huang W., McSwain M. V., Stark M. A., van der Meer A., Kaper L., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/423927 , 615, 422

  89. [102]

    H., Lebzelter T., Fekel F

    Hinkle K. H., Lebzelter T., Fekel F. C., Straniero O., Joyce R. R., Prato L., Karnath N., Habel N., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abbe01 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJ...904..143H 904, 143

  90. [103]

    R., Lyne A

    Hobbs G., Lorimer D. R., Lyne A. G., Kramer M., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09087.x , 360, 974

  91. [104]

    Y., Lin L

    Hu C.-P., Chou Y., Ng C. Y., Lin L. C.-C., Yen D. C.-C., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa79a3 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...844...16H 844, 16

  92. [105]

    B., 1984, @doi [Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific] 10.1086/131339 , 96, 312

    Hutchings J. B., 1984, @doi [Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific] 10.1086/131339 , 96, 312

  93. [106]

    Hutchings J., Cowley A., Crampton D., Paradus J., White N., 1979, @doi [ ] 10.1086/157042 , 229

  94. [107]

    Hutchings J., Crampton D., Cowley A., 1981, @doi [ ] 10.1086/112959 , 86, 871

  95. [108]

    B., Crampton D., Cowley A

    Hutchings J. B., Crampton D., Cowley A. P., Thompson I. B., 1987, @doi [ ] 10.1086/131998 , 99, 420

  96. [109]

    A., Chevalier C., Motch C., 1982, , 114, L7

    Ilovaisky S. A., Chevalier C., Motch C., 1982, , 114, L7

  97. [110]

    Janka H.-T., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aa618e , 837, 84

  98. [111]

    A., Chevalier C., 1981, , 99, 274

    Janot-Pacheco E., Ilovaisky S. A., Chevalier C., 1981, , 99, 274

  99. [112]

    J., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347318 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...677L...9J 677, L9

    Janssens S., Shenar T., Degenaar N., Bodensteiner J., Sana H., Audenaert J., Frost A. J., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202347318 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...677L...9J 677, L9

  100. [113]

    Jaschek M., Jaschek C., 1963, @doi [ ] 10.1086/127968 , 75, 365

  101. [114]

    A., 2017, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ATel10812....1J 10812, 1

    Jenke P., Wilson-Hodge C. A., 2017, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ATel10812....1J 10812, 1

  102. [115]

    Johnston M., Bradt H., Doxsey R., Gursky H., Schwartz D., Schwarz J., 1978, @doi [ ] 10.1086/182731 , 223, L71

  103. [116]

    N., Lyne A

    Johnston S., Manchester R. N., Lyne A. G., Nicastro L., Spyromilio J., 1994, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/268.2.430 , 268, 430

  104. [117]

    Jones C., Forman W., Tananbaum H., Schreier E., Gursky H., Kellogg E., Giacconi R., 1973, @doi [ ] 10.1086/181181 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1973ApJ...181L..43J 181, L43

  105. [118]

    J \"o nsson H., et al., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-3881/aba592 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020AJ....160..120J 160, 120

  106. [119]

    Kaaret P., Cusumano G., Sacco B., 2000, @doi [ ] 10.1086/312918 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2000ApJ...542L..41K 542, L41

  107. [120]

    Kalogera V., 1996, @doi [ ] 10.1086/177974 , 471, 352

  108. [121]

    Kaper L., Lamers H. J. G. L. M., Ruymaekers E., Heuvel E. P. J. v. d., Zuiderwijk E. J., 1995,

  109. [122]

    Kaper L., van der Meer A., Najarro F., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20065393 , 457, 595

  110. [123]

    I., Lutovinov A

    Karasev D. I., Lutovinov A. A., Burenin R. A., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2010.00949.x , 409, L69

  111. [125]

    Kawata D., Bovy J., Matsunaga N., Baba J., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty2623 , 482, 40

  112. [126]

    L., Rappaport S., Clark G

    Kelley R. L., Rappaport S., Clark G. W., Petro L. D., 1983, @doi [ ] 10.1086/161001 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...268..790K 268, 790

  113. [127]

    A., Lien A

    Kennea J. A., Lien A. Y., Krimm H. A., Cenko S. B., Siegel M. H., 2017, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ATel10809....1K 10809, 1

  114. [128]

    V., Scholz R.-D., Piskunov A

    Kharchenko N. V., Scholz R.-D., Piskunov A. E., Röser S., Schilbach E., 2007, @doi [Astronomische Nachrichten] 10.1002/asna.200710776 , 328, 889

  115. [129]

    J., Podsiadlowski P., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature10529 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011Natur.479..372K 479, 372

    Knigge C., Coe M. J., Podsiadlowski P., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1038/nature10529 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011Natur.479..372K 479, 372

  116. [130]

    G., Georgiev L., 2003, @doi [Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0211554 , 39, 17

    Koenigsberger G., Canalizo G., Arrieta A., Richer M. G., Georgiev L., 2003, @doi [Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/0211554 , 39, 17

  117. [131]

    Z., 2017, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ATel10822....1K 10822, 1

    Kouroubatzakis K., Reig P., Andrews J., ) A. Z., 2017, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ATel10822....1K 10822, 1

  118. [132]

    Koyama K., et al., 1991, @doi [ ] 10.1086/185900 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1991ApJ...366L..19K 366, L19

  119. [134]

    C., Markert T

    Lamb R. C., Markert T. H., Hartman R. C., Thompson D. J., Bignami G. F., 1980, @doi [ ] 10.1086/158151 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1980ApJ...239..651L 239, 651

  120. [135]

    A., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20020781 , 391, 219

    Leahy D. A., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20020781 , 391, 219

  121. [136]

    Leyder J.-C., Walter R., Lazos M., Masetti N., Produit N., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20066317 , 465, L35

  122. [137]

    pp 109--114, @doi 10.1051/eas/1045018

    Lindegren L., Bastian U., 2010, in EAS Publications Series. pp 109--114, @doi 10.1051/eas/1045018

  123. [138]

    Lindegren L., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202039653 , 649, A4

  124. [139]

    Z., van Paradijs J., van den Heuvel E

    Liu Q. Z., van Paradijs J., van den Heuvel E. P. J., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20064987 , 455, 1165

  125. [140]

    Luna G. J. M., Sokoloski J. L., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1086/522576 , 671, 741

  126. [141]

    Lutovinov A., Revnivtsev M., Gilfanov M., Shtykovskiy P., Molkov S., Sunyaev R., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20042392 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...444..821L 444, 821

  127. [142]

    S., Rostopchin S

    Lyubimkov L. S., Rostopchin S. I., Roche P., Tarasov A. E., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/286.3.549 , 286, 549

  128. [143]

    M., Zaĭtseva G

    Lyuty V. M., Zaĭtseva G. V., 2000, @doi [Astronomy Letters] 10.1134/1.20364 , 26, 9

  129. [144]

    N., Johnston S., Lyne A

    Manchester R. N., Johnston S., Lyne A. G., D'Amico N., Bailes M., Nicastro L., 1995, @doi [ ] 10.1086/187908 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1995ApJ...445L.137M 445, L137

  130. [145]

    M., Mao M

    Marcote B., Ribó M., Paredes J. M., Mao M. Y., Edwards P. G., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201832572 , 619, A26

  131. [146]

    Masetti N., Orlandini M., Palazzi E., Amati L., Frontera F., 2006a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20065025 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2006A&A...453..295M 453, 295

  132. [147]

    Masetti N., et al., 2006b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20065111 , 455, 11

  133. [148]

    Masetti N., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200811322 , 495, 121

  134. [149]

    Masetti N., et al., 2012, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201118559 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2012A&A...538A.123M 538, A123

  135. [150]

    A., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20054239 , 451, 267

    McBride V. A., et al., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20054239 , 451, 267

  136. [151]

    A., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20077238 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...470.1065M 470, 1065

    McBride V. A., et al., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20077238 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...470.1065M 470, 1065

  137. [152]

    V., Gies D

    McSwain M. V., Gies D. R., Riddle R. L., Wang Z., Wingert D. W., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1086/323571 , 558, L43

  138. [153]

    V., Gies D

    McSwain M. V., Gies D. R., Huang W., Wiita P. J., Wingert D. W., Kaper L., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1086/379892 , 600, 927

  139. [154]

    Mereghetti S., La Palombara N., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200911944 , 504, 181

  140. [155]

    J., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1280 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.506.1045M 506, 1045

    Middleton M. J., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stab1280 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.506.1045M 506, 1045

  141. [156]

    Miller-Jones J. C. A., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/sty1775 , 479, 4849

  142. [157]

    Miller-Jones J. C. A., et al., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1126/science.abb3363 , 371, 1046

  143. [158]

    Mirabel F., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1016/j.newar.2017.04.002 , 78, 1

  144. [159]

    F., Rodrigues I., 2003, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1083451 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003Sci...300.1119M 300, 1119

    Mirabel I. F., Rodrigues I., 2003, @doi [Science] 10.1126/science.1083451 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003Sci...300.1119M 300, 1119

  145. [160]

    M., McBride V

    Monageng I. M., McBride V. A., Alfonso-Garzon J., Townsend L. J., Coley J. B., Montesinos B., Corbet R. H. D., Pottschmidt K., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad3445 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527.5293M 527, 5293

  146. [162]

    C., 2018b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/psy053 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PASJ...70...61M 70, 61

    Moritani Y., Kawano T., Chimasu S., Kawachi A., Takahashi H., Takata J., Carciofi A. C., 2018b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/pasj/psy053 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018PASJ...70...61M 70, 61

  147. [163]

    Motch C., Haberl F., Dennerl K., Pakull M., Janot-Pacheco E., 1997, , 323, 853

  148. [164]

    Murakami T., Kawai N., Makishima K., Mitani K., Hayakawa S., Nagase F., Tawara Y., Kunieda H., 1984, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984PASJ...36..691M 36, 691

  149. [165]

    Nagase F., 1989, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989PASJ...41....1N 41, 1

  150. [166]

    Negueruela I., 1998, , 338, 505

  151. [167]

    L., Combi J

    Negueruela I., 2010, in Mart \' J., Luque-Escamilla P. L., Combi J. A., eds, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series Vol. 422, High Energy Phenomena in Massive Stars. p. 57 ( @eprint arXiv 0907.2883 ), @doi 10.48550/arXiv.0907.2883

  152. [168]

    T., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20010146 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...369..108N 369, 108

    Negueruela I., Okazaki A. T., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20010146 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...369..108N 369, 108

  153. [169]

    Negueruela I., Roche P., Buckley D. a. H., Chakrabarty D., Coe M. J., Fabregat J., Reig P., 1996, , 315, 160

  154. [171]

    M., Chaty S., 2005, The Astronomer's Telegram, 470, 1

    Negueruela I., Smith D. M., Chaty S., 2005, The Astronomer's Telegram, 470, 1

  155. [172]

    M., Harrison T

    Negueruela I., Smith D. M., Harrison T. E., Torrejon J. M., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1086/498935 , 638, 982

  156. [173]

    M., van den Heuvel E

    Nelemans G., Tauris T. M., van den Heuvel E. P. J., 1999, @doi [ ] 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9911054 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999A&A...352L..87N 352, L87

  157. [174]

    Neumann M., Avakyan A., Doroshenko V., Santangelo A., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202245728 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...677A.134N 677, A134

  158. [175]

    A., Bikmaev I

    Nikolaeva E. A., Bikmaev I. F., Melnikov S. S., Galeev A. I., Zhuchkov R. Y., Irtuganov E. N., 2013, @doi [Bulletin Crimean Astrophysical Observatory] 10.3103/S0190271713010166 , 109, 27

  159. [176]

    T., Negueruela I., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20011083 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...377..161O 377, 161

    Okazaki A. T., Negueruela I., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20011083 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...377..161O 377, 161

  160. [177]

    A., Hofmann W., Rieger F

    Paredes-Fortuny X., Rib \'o M., Fors O., N \'u \ n ez J., 2012, in Aharonian F. A., Hofmann W., Rieger F. M., eds, American Institute of Physics Conference Series Vol. 1505, High Energy Gamma-Ray Astronomy: 5th International Meeting on High Energy Gamma-Ray Astronomy. pp 390--...

  161. [178]

    E., Murdin P

    Parkes G. E., Murdin P. G., Mason K. O., 1980a, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/190.3.537 , 190, 537

  162. [179]

    E., Mason K

    Parkes G. E., Mason K. O., Murdin P. G., Culhane J. L., 1980b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/191.3.547 , 191, 547

  163. [180]

    Paxton B., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0067-0049/220/1/15 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJS..220...15P 220, 15

  164. [181]

    J., Chaty S., Negueruela I., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20054436 , 455, 653

    Pellizza L. J., Chaty S., Negueruela I., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20054436 , 455, 653

  165. [182]

    N., Harvey E

    Picchi P., Shore S. N., Harvey E. J., Berdyugin A., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202037960 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...640A..96P 640, A96

  166. [183]

    F., et al., 1989, in Hunt J., Battrick B., eds, ESA Special Publication Vol

    Polcaro V. F., et al., 1989, in Hunt J., Battrick B., eds, ESA Special Publication Vol. 1, Two Topics in X-Ray Astronomy, Volume 1: X Ray Binaries. Volume 2: AGN and the X Ray Background. p. 579

  167. [184]

    C., Terrell J., 1983a, @doi [ ] 10.1086/161406 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...273..709P 273, 709

    Priedhorsky W. C., Terrell J., 1983a, @doi [ ] 10.1086/161406 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983ApJ...273..709P 273, 709

  168. [185]

    C., Terrell J., 1983b, @doi [ ] 10.1038/303681a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983Natur.303..681P 303, 681

    Priedhorsky W. C., Terrell J., 1983b, @doi [ ] 10.1038/303681a0 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1983Natur.303..681P 303, 681

  169. [187]

    A., Leigh N

    Rao A., Gandhi P., Knigge C., Paice J. A., Leigh N. W. C., Boubert D., 2020b, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/staa1217 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.495.1491R 495, 1491

  170. [188]

    W., Cominsky L., Joss P

    Rappaport S., Clark G. W., Cominsky L., Joss P. C., Li F., 1978, @doi [ ] 10.1086/182745 , 224, L1

  171. [189]

    S., Chakrabarty D., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/344300 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...581.1293R 581, 1293

    Ray P. S., Chakrabarty D., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/344300 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002ApJ...581.1293R 581, 1293

  172. [190]

    J., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/700/1/137 , 700, 137

    Reid M. J., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/700/1/137 , 700, 137

  173. [191]

    J., McClintock J

    Reid M. J., McClintock J. E., Narayan R., Gou L., Remillard R. A., Orosz J. A., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1088/0004-637X/742/2/83 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011ApJ...742...83R 742, 83

  174. [192]

    Reig P., Fabregat J., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201425008 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...574A..33R 574, A33

  175. [194]

    Reig P., Roche P., 1999b, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1999.02473.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999MNRAS.306..100R 306, 100

  176. [195]

    Reig P., Zezas A., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201732533 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A&A...613A..52R 613, A52

  177. [196]

    J., Fabregat J., Negueruela I., Prince T

    Reig P., Chakrabarty D., Coe M. J., Fabregat J., Negueruela I., Prince T. A., Roche P., Steele I. A., 1996, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1996A&A...311..879R 311, 879

  178. [197]

    J., Roche P., Chakrabarty D., Negueruela I., Steele I., 1997, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997A&A...322..183R 322, 183

    Reig P., Fabregat J., Coe M. J., Roche P., Chakrabarty D., Negueruela I., Steele I., 1997, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997A&A...322..183R 322, 183

  179. [198]

    Reig P., Negueruela I., Buckley D. A. H., Coe M. J., Fabregat J., Haigh N. J., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20000238 , 367, 266

  180. [199]

    Reig P., Negueruela I., Fabregat J., Chato R., Blay P., Mavromatakis F., 2004, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20035786 , 421, 673

  181. [200]

    Reig P., Negueruela I., Papamastorakis G., Manousakis A., Kougentakis T., 2005a, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20052684 , 440, 637

  182. [201]

    J., 2005b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20053124 , 440, 1079

    Reig P., Negueruela I., Fabregat J., Chato R., Coe M. J., 2005b, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20053124 , 440, 1079

  183. [202]

    Reig P., Zezas A., Gkouvelis L., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201014788 , 522, A107

  184. [203]

    J., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628271 , 590, A122

    Reig P., Nersesian A., Zezas A., Gkouvelis L., Coe M. J., 2016, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201628271 , 590, A122

  185. [204]

    Reig P., Fabregat J., Alfonso-Garz \'o n J., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202038333 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...640A..35R 640, A35

  186. [205]

    Renzo M., et al., 2019, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201833297 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019A&A...624A..66R 624, A66

  187. [206]

    P., Nelemans G., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx027 , p

    Repetto S., Igoshev A. P., Nelemans G., 2017, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stx027 , p. stx027

  188. [207]

    P., Bell S

    Reynolds A. P., Bell S. A., Hilditch R. W., 1992, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/256.3.631 , 256, 631

  189. [208]

    D., Baade D., Shepard K., Hadrava P., 2024, in Mackey J., Vink J

    Rivinius T., Klement R., Chojnowski S. D., Baade D., Shepard K., Hadrava P., 2024, in Mackey J., Vink J. S., St-Louis N., eds, IAU Symposium Vol. 361, IAU Symposium. pp 332--333, @doi 10.1017/S1743921322002976

  190. [209]

    L., Ivans I

    Robinson E. L., Ivans I. I., Welsh W. F., 2002, @doi [ ] 10.1086/324715 , 565, 1169

  191. [210]

    Romano P., et al., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201525749 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015A&A...576L...4R 576, L4

  192. [211]

    Sadakane K., Hirata R., 1985, , 288, 8

  193. [212]

    E., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14138.x , 392, 1242

    Sarty G. E., et al., 2009, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14138.x , 392, 1242

  194. [213]

    L., Rappaport S., White N

    Sato N., Nagase F., Kawai N., Kelley R. L., Rappaport S., White N. E., 1986, @doi [ ] 10.1086/164157 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1986ApJ...304..241S 304, 241

  195. [214]

    Sidoli L., Vercellone S., Mereghetti S., Tavani M., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:200400114 , 429, L47

  196. [215]

    Sidoli L., Paizis A., Mereghetti S., 2006, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20064940 , 450, L9

  197. [216]

    Sidoli L., Romano P., Mereghetti S., Paizis A., Vercellone S., Mangano V., G \"o tz D., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20078137 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...476.1307S 476, 1307

  198. [217]

    M., 2004, The Astronomer's Telegram, 338

    Smith D. M., 2004, The Astronomer's Telegram, 338

  199. [218]

    Staubert R., Pottschmidt K., Doroshenko V., Wilms J., Suchy S., Rothschild R., Santangelo A., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/201015737 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011A&A...527A...7S 527, A7

  200. [219]

    A., Negueruela I., Coe M

    Steele I. A., Negueruela I., Coe M. J., Roche P., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.01593.x , 297, L5

  201. [220]

    E., Davelaar J., Parmar A

    Stella L., White N. E., Davelaar J., Parmar A. N., Blissett R. J., van der Klis M., 1985, @doi [ ] 10.1086/184419 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1985ApJ...288L..45S 288, L45

  202. [221]

    B., Reig P., Coe M

    Stevens J. B., Reig P., Coe M. J., Buckley D. A. H., Fabregat J., Steele I. A., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/288.4.988 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1997MNRAS.288..988S 288, 988

  203. [222]

    J., Lloyd C., 1994, The Observatory, 114, 41

    Stickland D. J., Lloyd C., 1994, The Observatory, 114, 41

  204. [223]

    Stickland D., Lloyd C., Radziun-Woodham A., 1997, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/286.2.L21 , 286, L21

  205. [224]

    T., Finger M

    Stollberg M. T., Finger M. H., Wilson R. B., Harmon B. A., Rubin B. C., Zhang N. S., Fishman G. J., 1993, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1993IAUC.5836....1S 5836, 1

  206. [225]

    A., Zamanov R

    Stoyanov K. A., Zamanov R. K., Latev G. Y., Abedin A. Y., Tomov N. A., 2014, @doi [Astronomische Nachrichten] 10.1002/asna.201412127 , 335, 1060

  207. [227]

    C., Salinas R., Peacock M., 2015b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/813/2/L26 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...813L..26S 813, L26

    Strader J., Chomiuk L., Cheung C. C., Salinas R., Peacock M., 2015b, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/813/2/L26 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...813L..26S 813, L26

  208. [228]

    H., Smith D

    Swank J. H., Smith D. M., Markwardt C. B., 2007, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007ATel..999....1S 999, 1

  209. [229]

    D., 1970, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/150.2.215 , 150, 215

    Thackeray A. D., 1970, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/150.2.215 , 150, 215

  210. [230]

    M., Orr A., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20011070 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...377..148T 377, 148

    Torrej \'o n J. M., Orr A., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20011070 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...377..148T 377, 148

  211. [231]

    S., Doroshenko V., Mushtukov A

    Tsygankov S. S., Doroshenko V., Mushtukov A. A., Lutovinov A. A., Poutanen J., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnrasl/sly116 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.479L.134T 479, L134

  212. [232]

    W., Warwick R

    Tweedy R. W., Warwick R. S., Remillard R., 1989, in Hunt J., Battrick B., eds, ESA Special Publication Vol. 1, Two Topics in X-Ray Astronomy, Volume 1: X Ray Binaries. Volume 2: AGN and the X Ray Background. p. 661

  213. [233]

    S., de Koter A., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20052862 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...442..587V 442, 587

    Vink J. S., de Koter A., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20052862 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...442..587V 442, 587

  214. [234]

    S., de Koter A., Lamers H

    Vink J. S., de Koter A., Lamers H. J. G. L. M., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20010127 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...369..574V 369, 574

  215. [235]

    Virtanen P., et al., 2020, scipy/scipy: SciPy 1.5.3 , Zenodo, @doi 10.5281/zenodo.4100507

  216. [236]

    Volkov I., Kargaltsev O., Younes G., Hare J., Pavlov G., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/abfe0e , 915, 61

  217. [237]

    A., Bozzo E., Tsygankov S

    Walter R., Lutovinov A. A., Bozzo E., Tsygankov S. S., 2015, @doi [ ] 10.1007/s00159-015-0082-6 , 23, 2

  218. [238]

    Wang W., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/200913196 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010A&A...516A..15W 516, A15

  219. [239]

    Wang W., 2011, @doi [ ] 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18192.x , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.413.1083W 413, 1083

  220. [240]

    I., Li X.-D., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/adc56f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...985...12W 985, 12

    Wang X. I., Li X.-D., 2025, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/adc56f , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...985...12W 985, 12

  221. [241]

    Waters L. B. F. M., Pols O. R., Hogeveen S. J., Cote J., van den Heuvel E. P. J., 1989, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1989A&A...220L...1W 220, L1

  222. [242]

    J., Gies D

    Williams S. J., Gies D. R., Matson R. A., Touhami Y., Grundstrom E. D., Huang W., McSwain M. V., 2010, @doi [ ] 10.1088/2041-8205/723/1/L93 , 723, L93

  223. [243]

    E., 1953, Carnegie Institute Washington D.C

    Wilson R. E., 1953, Carnegie Institute Washington D.C. Publication

  224. [244]

    A., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aace60 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...863....9W 863, 9

    Wilson-Hodge C. A., et al., 2018, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/aace60 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018ApJ...863....9W 863, 9

  225. [245]

    A., Finger M

    Wilson C. A., Finger M. H., Harmon B. A., Chakrabarty D., Strohmayer T., 1998, @doi [ ] 10.1086/305677 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...499..820W 499, 820

  226. [246]

    Yoneda H., Makishima K., Enoto T., Khangulyan D., Matsumoto T., Takahashi T., 2020, @doi [ ] 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.111103 , 125, 111103

  227. [247]

    Zeng L., Zhang M., Ren C., Zhang P., Yan J., 2024, @doi [ ] 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7bb6 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...977...40Z 977, 40

  228. [248]

    D., Knigge C., Charles P

    Zhao Y., Gandhi P., Brown C. D., Knigge C., Charles P. A., Maccarone T. J., Nuchvanichakul P., 2023, @doi [ ] 10.1093/mnras/stad2226 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.tmp.2163Z

  229. [249]

    Zorec J., Fr \'e mat Y., Cidale L., 2005, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20053051 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2005A&A...441..235Z 441, 235

  230. [250]

    R., Kuiper L

    den Hartog P. R., Kuiper L. M., Corbet R. H. D., in't Zand J. J. M., Hermsen W., Vink J., Remillard R., van der Klis M., 2004, The Astronomer's Telegram, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004ATel..281....1D 281, 1

  231. [251]

    in't Zand J. J. M., Halpern J., Eracleous M., McCollough M., Augusteijn T., Remillard R. A., Heise J., 2000, , 361, 85

  232. [252]

    in't Zand J. J. M., Swank J., Corbet R. H. D., Markwardt C. B., 2001, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20011512 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001A&A...380L..26I 380, L26

  233. [253]

    in't Zand J. J. M., Kuiper L., den Hartog P. R., Hermsen W., Corbet R. H. D., 2007, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361:20077189 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2007A&A...469.1063I 469, 1063

  234. [254]

    van den Heuvel E. P. J., Zwart S. F. P., Bhattacharya D., Kaper L., 2000,

  235. [255]

    M., 1984, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984A&A...135..155V 135, 155

    van der Klis M., Bonnet-Bidaud J. M., 1984, , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1984A&A...135..155V 135, 155

  236. [256]

    van der Meij V., Guo D., Kaper L., Renzo M., 2021, @doi [ ] 10.1051/0004-6361/202040114 , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...655A..31V 655, A31

Pith tools

Reviewed August 15, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.