Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 8 minor 1 cited by

Fine-grained dynamics of entanglement in non-integrable quenches far across the Ising quantum critical point

T0 review · 3 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read Quenching a 200-spin Ising chain from paramagnet to ferromagnet makes small subsystems repeatedly approach maximal entanglement, lose it, and regain it, while the reverse quench stays featureless.

desk verdict Plausible new phenomenology of small-subsystem entanglement in Ising quenches, but the lack of a bond-dimension convergence check is the key unresolved issue before trusting the sharp features. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.15203 v3 pith:VYAJDD2I submitted 2025-04-21 quant-ph cond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-el

classification quant-phcond-mat.quant-gascond-mat.stat-mechcond-mat.str-el
keywords entanglemententropiesspinchainsquantumquenchesinformationnegativitysingle-copytripartitemutualIsingcriticalpoint
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper tries to establish that the far-from-equilibrium dynamics of a mixed-field Ising spin chain, viewed at the level of one- to four-spin subsystems, is rich and structured when the chain is quenched from its paramagnetic ground state deep into the ferromagnetic regime. The central claim is that this quench direction produces a repeating, roughly periodic pattern in which small-subsystem entanglement entropies climb to near their theoretical maxima and fall back, two-spin entanglement undergoes sudden deaths and revivals, single-copy entropy shows non-analytic cusps, and local tripartite mutual information alternates between scrambling and unscrambling. The opposite quench, from ferromagnet to paramagnet, shows none of this and looks essentially Markovian. The paper further claims that the integrable and non-integrable dynamics are nearly identical at very early times, after which the integrable system mixes better and equilibrates faster. A sympathetic reader would care because these fine-grained signatures are accessible to site-resolved ultracold experiments and tie slow non-integrable relaxation to confinement, non-Markovianity, and periodic reorganization of local quantum information.

What carries the argument

The carrying object is the set of reduced density matrices of one-, two-, three-, and four-spin subsystems of the 200-spin chain during evolution under the post-quench Hamiltonian. From these the paper extracts: the von Neumann and second-Rényi entanglement entropies; the single-copy entanglement entropy $-\ln p_{\max}$, which depends only on the leading reduced-density-matrix eigenvalue and produces cusps at avoided crossings; the negativity of the partially transposed two-spin density matrix and the Wootters concurrence, which both vanish exactly when the two-spin state is separable; the level-$k$ sums of ordered eigenvalues, which test majorization and subsystem mixedness; and the tripartite mutual information $I_3(A:B:C)=I_2(A:B)+I_2(A:C)-I_2(A:BC)$, whose sign tracks whether information about one spin is shared more non-locally by the other two together than by either alone. The repeated near-maximal one- and two-spin entropies amount to transient approximate one-uniformity, meaning each of those spins is nearly maximally mixed with the rest of the chain. These small-subsystem objects, rather than any global observable, carry the argument; the recurring time scale of roughly $1.55$ time units (and half that between a minimum and a maximum) appears across all of them.

What would settle it

Repeat the same quench with a maximum bond dimension of 100, 200, or 400, or with an independent time-evolution method, and compare the times of the single-copy-entropy cusps and the intervals where two-spin negativity vanishes exactly; if the cusp times shift, the zero intervals fill in, or the one-spin entropy plateaus stop reaching $\ln 2$, the features are truncation artifacts rather than dynamics.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Working with the Hamiltonian $H=-J\sum_j \sigma^z_j\sigma^z_{j+1} - h^x\sum_j \sigma^x_j - h^z\sum_j \sigma^z_j$ on $N=200$ spins and evolving it with second-order time-evolving block decimation in matrix product states, the paper claims that the quench from $(J,h^x,h^z)=(0.2,1,0)$ to $(1,0.1,0.5)$ repeatedly drives one- and two-spin reduced density matrices almost to the maximally mixed state, so their von Neumann entropies nearly touch $\ln 2$ and $\ln 4$, respectively. At those same instants the two-spin pair becomes separable, with exactly vanishing negativity and concurrence, even though it is maximally entangled with the rest of the chain; the paper reads the repeated approach to these maxima and subsequent declines as a recurring Page-like dynamics (the entropy curve of a subsystem in a random pure state), which only one- and two-spin subsystems show. Larger subsystems never reach their entropy bounds, but their single-copy entanglement entropies $-\ln p_{\max}$ develop sharp non-analytic cusps where the two largest eigenvalues of the reduced density matrix avoid crossing. The same dynamics shows periodic death and revival of entanglement between adjacent bulk spins, persistent non-monotone majorization (insufficient mixedness), and tripartite mutual information that oscillates between negative and near-zero values, i.e., cycles of scrambling and unscrambling of local information. All of these features are presented as fine-grained companions of the slow, confined, non-Markovian relaxation that distinguishes this quench direction from its reverse.

Load-bearing premise

The numerical approximation that compresses the 200-spin wavefunction (keeping only a limited amount of correlations, with a truncation cutoff of $10^{-9}$ and a maximum bond dimension of 50) is accurate enough that the sharp recurring features in the reduced density matrices are real dynamics and not truncation noise; only the time-step size, not this compression accuracy, was explicitly checked for convergence.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The transient near-maximal single-spin plateaus mean the chain periodically passes through approximately one-uniform states, so the dynamics itself is a repeating source of states in which a single spin is maximally mixed with the environment, a resource for one-spin error-correcting and metrological protocols.
  • Because two-spin negativity and concurrence both vanish exactly when the pair's entropy is maximal, adjacent bulk spins are periodically separable yet individually nearly maximally entangled with the rest of the chain; site-resolved experiments on Rydberg or trapped-ion arrays could observe this as a repeating on-off pattern in two-site entanglement.
  • The non-analytic cusps in single-copy entropy, tied to avoided crossings in the leading entanglement-spectrum eigenvalues, give a time-domain probe of transitions in the entanglement Hamiltonian that can be measured through the largest eigenvalue of a small subsystem's density matrix.
  • The early-time overlap between integrable and non-integrable dynamics, followed by divergence, implies a universal early-time regime fixed by the quench itself rather than by integrability, making the first few time units a robust experimental target.
  • If these features survive larger bond dimensions and system sizes, they provide a practical small-subsystem diagnostic for slow non-integrable relaxation: periodic resetting of local information instead of monotone scrambling.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the ~1.55-time-unit period is set by the confined kink-antikink 'meson' spectrum of the non-integrable ferromagnetic side, then the period should scale predictably with the longitudinal field $h^z$; computing that scaling and comparing it with the numerics would both test the mechanism and let experiments tune the recurrence frequency.
  • The coincidence of maximal single-spin entropy with zero two-spin negativity suggests the state at those instants is close to a product of a nearly maximally mixed spin and a pure state of the remainder; if verified, these instants are natural reset points for quantum protocols needing a fresh, nearly unpolarized qubit.
  • The reversal of majorization order every half-cycle implies the direction of local-operations-and-classical-communication convertibility flips periodically, so the chain may function as a periodic entanglement refrigerator that cyclically concentrates and dilutes bipartite entanglement; preparing two distant spins and checking convertibility between successive extrema would test this.
  • The early-time integrable/non-integrable overlap suggests the earliest fine-grained dynamics is governed by the local quench energy and not by integrability; repeating the quench with different integrability-breaking perturbations and looking for a universal early-time envelope in one-spin entropy would be a direct extension.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 8 minor

Summary. This paper reports numerical observations of 'fine-grained' quantum-information dynamics in the mixed-field Ising chain after quenches far across the Ising critical point. Using TEBD2 matrix-product-state simulations (N=200, maximum bond dimension 50, truncation cutoff 10^-9, time step 0.01 checked against 0.002), the author studies one- and two-spin entanglement entropies, single-copy entanglement entropy, negativity and concurrence, majorization relations, and bipartite and tripartite mutual information. The central claims are that paramagnetic-to-ferromagnetic quenches display recurrent near-maximal (Page-like) entropy for one- and two-spin subsystems, short-lived approximately 1-uniform single-spin states, sudden death and revival of two-spin negativity, non-analytic cusps in single-copy entropy for three-spin and larger subsystems, non-monotonic majorization, and periodic scrambling-unscrambling of local tripartite mutual information, while the reverse quench is essentially featureless. The paper also finds near-identical early-time dynamics in the integrable and non-integrable cases and interprets the rich paramagnetic-to-ferromagnetic direction as accompanying subsystem non-Markovianity.

Significance. If the numerical results are correct, the paper provides a catalog of fine-grained entanglement and information-theoretic signatures of confinement-dominated quench dynamics across the Ising critical point. Its strengths are that the numerical protocol is clearly specified; the observables are computed directly from the quench wavefunction rather than fitted; there are no free parameters; and the author appropriately gates the PPT interpretation for higher-dimensional subsystems by raising bound entanglement. The observations are novel at the level of small-subsystem diagnostics and are potentially testable with quantum-gas-microscope experiments. The significance is, however, conditional on missing convergence checks: the most striking features (zero-negativity intervals, single-copy cusps, near-maximal entropy plateaus) are precisely the quantities most sensitive to MPS truncation.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3, simulation parameters paragraph; Figs. 1-3] The central numerical claims are not yet validated with respect to the MPS bond dimension. The manuscript reports only a time-step check (tau=0.01 vs 0.002) and fixes the maximum bond dimension at chi=50. The headline features are all truncation-sensitive: the zero-negativity intervals in Fig. 2 require the partially transposed two-spin RDM to have no negative eigenvalues at numerical precision; the cusps in single-copy entropy in Fig. 1 (right) are non-analyticities in the largest RDM eigenvalue; and the plateaus EE1p near ln(2) in Fig. 3 require the one-spin RDM to be nearly maximally mixed. I ask for a convergence check with chi=100 and chi=200 (for example, over the time window containing the first few revivals) and a report of the truncation error or discarded weight. Without this, the abstract's qualitative claims remain conditional rather than established.
  2. [Section 3, simulation parameters paragraph; Figs. 1-5] The statement that the results were 'verified to be independent of the other system sizes' is not substantiated by any data in the manuscript. Since the headline features are periodic oscillations, a skeptical reader cannot distinguish intrinsic dynamics from finite-size revivals without seeing at least one comparison at a different N (for example, N=100 or N=300). Please include such a comparison for a representative observable, such as EE1p or two-spin negativity.
  3. [Section 3.1.1 and Fig. 1 (right)] The explanation that the single-copy entropy cusps are 'due to avoided crossings (or approximately so)' is not consistent with the observed non-analyticity. An avoided crossing leaves the largest eigenvalue on the same smooth branch and produces no cusp; a cusp in S_1 = -ln p_max requires an actual crossing of the two largest eigenvalues. Please clarify which situation occurs, for example by plotting the two largest eigenvalues of the relevant reduced density matrix around a cusp.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Section 3.1.2] The text contains an unresolved '[refs]' placeholder in the discussion of sudden death of entanglement; this must be resolved before publication.
  2. [Section 3.1.3] The statement that a 1-uniform state 'is nothing but the single-spin Greenberger-Horne-Zeilinger (GHZ) state' is incorrect: many states other than GHZ states (for example, cluster states) have all one-spin reduced density matrices maximally mixed. Please rephrase to say only that the single-spin reduced state is maximally mixed.
  3. [Section 3.1.6(b)] The text says 'the integrable cases (h_z={0.5,1})' where it should say 'the non-integrable cases'; h_z=0.5 and h_z=1 are not integrable.
  4. [Fig. 4 and Section 3.1.4] The text refers to 'Fig. 4 (bottom)', but Fig. 4 has only left and right panels; the reference should be corrected to the appropriate panel.
  5. [Fig. 1 and Section 3] The time unit is labeled 'sec' in the figures, but the text says times are in units of J^{-1} (and h_x^{-1} in Section 3.2); this is confusing and should be made dimensionless or explicitly related to the Hamiltonian parameters.
  6. [Abstract and conclusion] The statement that the features are 'expected to hold' for quenches across Ising critical points in more complicated systems including two-dimensional systems is an unsupported extrapolation; it should be removed or explicitly labeled as speculation.
  7. [Section 3.1.3] The term 'Page-like dynamics' is used qualitatively; please state a quantitative criterion (for example, the value of the entropy relative to ln D and the duration for which it stays near that value) so that the claim is testable.
  8. [Data Availability Statement] The statement that code and data are available 'upon reasonable request' is weaker than current community norms; consider depositing the code and data in a public repository.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the fine-grained observables are direct numerical outputs of the quench simulation, not fitted inputs or self-cited derivations.

full rationale

The paper's central claims are numerical observations of small-subsystem quantum-information quantities (vNEE, R2EE, single-copy entropy, negativity, concurrence, majorization sums, BMI, and TMI) computed from reduced density matrices obtained by TEBD2 evolution of the mixed-field Ising chain. There is no fitted parameter that is later renamed as a prediction, and no constructed equality by which an input quantity is defined in terms of the claimed output. The Page comparison is qualitative: the authors note that one- and two-spin von Neumann entropies repeatedly approach ln(2) and ln(4), respectively, and they describe this as reminiscent of Page-curve dynamics; this is an interpretive comparison, not a derivation that feeds back into the simulation. The only self-reference is the author's earlier non-Markovianity study, Ref. [53], which is cited to interpret the observed features as companions to information backflow. That citation is not load-bearing for the numerical observations themselves, and the features stand independently on the quoted simulation data, so it does not create circularity. Possible sensitivity of cusps, zero-negativity intervals, and near-maximal plateaus to the bond dimension (chi=50, cutoff 10^-9) is a numerical-convergence and correctness concern, not a circularity concern, especially because the reported convergence check covers the time step but not the bond dimension.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims are direct numerical observables, so no parameters are fitted to the data. The ledger consists of numerical-convergence assumptions, standard quantum-information background, the confinement-based physical picture borrowed from the literature, and an unsupported extrapolation to other systems.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption TEBD2 with truncation cutoff 10^-9 and maximum bond dimension 50 is accurate for all reported quantities over the simulated time window.
    Invoked in Section 3 simulation parameters paragraph; only time-step convergence (0.01 versus 0.002) is checked, not bond dimension, so the accuracy of cusps and zero-negativity intervals is assumed.
  • domain assumption DMRG ground states used as initial states are converged with the same truncation parameters.
    Initial states are obtained with DMRG using the same cutoff and bond dimension; no convergence data versus bond dimension are shown.
  • standard math Standard quantum-information relations: negativity detects two-qubit entanglement, concurrence is exact for two qubits, majorization theorem links LOCC convertibility, and negative TMI indicates scrambling.
    These are textbook results cited in Section 2 and used to interpret all later figures.
  • domain assumption Confinement of kink-antikink excitations causes slow thermalization in the non-integrable mixed-field Ising chain.
    Used in Sections 3.1 and 4 to attribute slow dynamics to confinement; based on cited literature on confinement.
  • ad hoc to paper The observed features generalize to quenches across Ising quantum critical points in more complicated systems, including two dimensions.
    Stated in the Conclusion without numerical or analytical support; this is an extrapolation beyond the presented data.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Fine-grained dynamics of entanglement in non-integrable quenches far across the Ising quantum critical point." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/VYAJDD2I

@misc{pith2026250415203,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Fine-grained dynamics of entanglement in non-integrable quenches far across the Ising quantum critical point},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/VYAJDD2I}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.15203}
}
abstract

The task of exploring and understanding various aspects of far-from-equilibrium dynamics of closed and generic quantum many-body systems has received a thrust of attention in recent years, driven partly by remarkable advances in ultracold experimental technologies. In this work, for the paradigmatic Ising spin chain with transverse and longitudinal fields and partly motivated by the practice of site-resolved control in contemporary ultracold experiments, we present numerical observations of several $\textit{fine-grained}$ (small-subsystem level) features of far-from-equilibrium dynamics from a quantum informational point of view, induced by quantum quenches far across the Ising critical point between states deep inside the para- and ferro-magnetic regimes. Rather featureless dynamics is seen for ferromagnetic to paramagnetic quenches, but paramagnetic to ferromagnetic quenches exhibit rich behaviour, including recurrences of an approximately Page-like dynamics of entanglement entropies of one- and two-spin subsystems, periodic but short-lived occurrences of approximately $1-$uniform states, a series of sudden deaths and revivals of entanglement between two spins in the system's bulk, non-analytic cusps in single-copy entanglement entropy for three-spin and bigger subsystems, insufficient mixedness and a series of scrambling-$\textit{un}$scrambling of local mutual information between neighboring spins. Moreover, essentially indistinguishable dynamics is seen at very early times between the integrable limit (zero longitudinal field) and non-integrable cases, with the former eventually showing signatures of better mixing and faster approach to equilibration than the latter. These features are expected to hold for quench dynamics across Ising quantum critical points in more complicated systems.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Non-Markovianity of subsystem dynamics in isolated quantum many-body systems

    quant-ph 2025-01 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Quenching a mixed-field Ising chain from paramagnetic to ferromagnetic parameters makes small subsystems display strong non-Markovian, memory-retaining dynamics, while the reverse quench is nearly Markovian.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

141 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Oxford University Press, UK (2012)

    Lewenstein, M., Sanpera, A., Ahufinger, V.: Ultracold Atoms in Optical Lattices: Simulating Quantum 15 Many-body Systems. Oxford University Press, UK (2012)

  2. [2]

    Science357(6355), 995– 1001 (2017)

    Gross, C., Bloch, I.: Quantum simulations with ultracold atoms in optical lattices. Science357(6355), 995– 1001 (2017)

  3. [3]

    Nature Reviews Physics 2(12), 669–681 (2020)

    Ueda, M.: Quantum equilibration, thermalization and prethermalization in ultracold atoms. Nature Reviews Physics 2(12), 669–681 (2020)

  4. [4]

    Nature Reviews Physics 2(8), 411–425 (2020)

    Schäfer, F., Fukuhara, T., Sugawa, S., Takasu, Y., Takahashi, Y.: Tools for quantum simulation with ultracold atoms in optical lattices. Nature Reviews Physics 2(8), 411–425 (2020)

  5. [5]

    Cambridge University Press, UK (2011)

    Sachdev, S.: Quantum Phase Transitions. Cambridge University Press, UK (2011)

  6. [6]

    Cambridge University Press, UK (2015)

    Dutta, A., Aeppli, G., Chakrabarti, B.K., Divakaran, U., Rosenbaum, T.F., Sen, D.: Quantum Phase Tran- sitions in Transverse Field Spin Models: From Statistical Physics to Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, UK (2015)

  7. [7]

    Cambridge University Press, UK (2017)

    Wilde, M.M.: Quantum Information Theory. Cambridge University Press, UK (2017)

  8. [8]

    Springer, Berlin (2017)

    Hayashi, M.: Quantum Information Theory: Mathematical Foundation. Springer, Berlin (2017)

Show all 141 references
  1. [9]

    De Gruyter, Berlin (2019)

    Holevo, A.S.: Quantum Systems, Channels, Information : A Mathematical Introduction. De Gruyter, Berlin (2019)

  2. [10]

    Nature Reviews Physics 1(10), 627–634 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-019-0090-y

    Lewis-Swan, R.J., Safavi-Naini, A., Kaufman, A.M., Rey, A.M.: Dynamics of quantum information. Nature Reviews Physics 1(10), 627–634 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-019-0090-y

  3. [11]

    Reports on Progress in Physics86(11), 114001 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ acf8d7

    Frérot, I., Fadel, M., Lewenstein, M.: Probing quantum correlations in many-body systems: a review of scalable methods. Reports on Progress in Physics86(11), 114001 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/ acf8d7

  4. [12]

    Polkovnikov, A., Sengupta, K., Silva, A., Vengalattore, M.: Colloquium: Nonequilibrium dynamics of closed interacting quantum systems. Rev. Mod. Phys. 83, 863–883 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys. 83.863

  5. [13]

    Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 9(Volume 9, 2018), 245–259 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031016-025451

    Mitra, A.: Quantum quench dynamics. Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 9(Volume 9, 2018), 245–259 (2018) https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031016-025451

  6. [14]

    Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2016(6), 064002 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1742-5468/2016/06/064002

    Essler, F.H.L., Fagotti, M.: Quench dynamics and relaxation in isolated integrable quantum spin chains. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2016(6), 064002 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1742-5468/2016/06/064002

  7. [15]

    SciPost Physics 4(3) (2018) https://doi.org/10.21468/scipostphys.4.3.017

    Alba, V., Calabrese, P.: Entanglement dynamics after quantum quenches in generic integrable systems. SciPost Physics 4(3) (2018) https://doi.org/10.21468/scipostphys.4.3.017

  8. [17]

    Bertini, B., Klobas, K., Alba, V., Lagnese, G., Calabrese, P.: Growth of rényi entropies in interacting inte- grable models and the breakdown of the quasiparticle picture. Phys. Rev. X 12, 031016 (2022) https: //doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.12.031016

  9. [18]

    Journal of Statis- tical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2005(04), 04010 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2005/ 04/P04010 16

    Calabrese, P., Cardy, J.: Evolution of entanglement entropy in one-dimensional systems. Journal of Statis- tical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2005(04), 04010 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2005/ 04/P04010 16

  10. [19]

    Journal of Statis- tical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2016(6), 064003 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2016/ 06/064003

    Calabrese, P., Cardy, J.: Quantum quenches in 1+1 dimensional conformal field theories. Journal of Statis- tical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2016(6), 064003 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2016/ 06/064003

  11. [20]

    Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2006(03), 03001 (2006) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1742-5468/2006/03/P03001

    Chiara, G.D., Montangero, S., Calabrese, P., Fazio, R.: Entanglement entropy dynamics of heisenberg chains. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2006(03), 03001 (2006) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/1742-5468/2006/03/P03001

  12. [21]

    Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2008(05), 05018 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/05/P05018

    Läuchli, A.M., Kollath, C.: Spreading of correlations and entanglement after a quench in the one- dimensional bose–hubbard model. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2008(05), 05018 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/05/P05018

  13. [22]

    Manmana, S.R., Wessel, S., Noack, R.M., Muramatsu, A.: Time evolution of correlations in strongly inter- acting fermions after a quantum quench. Phys. Rev. B79, 155104 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB. 79.155104

  14. [23]

    Science 337(6100), 1318–1322 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1224953

    Gring, M., Kuhnert, M., Langen, T., Kitagawa, T., Rauer, B., Schreitl, M., Mazets, I., Smith, D.A., Demler, E., Schmiedmayer, J.: Relaxation and prethermalization in an isolated quantum system. Science 337(6100), 1318–1322 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1224953

  15. [24]

    Nature481(7382), 484–487 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10748

    Cheneau, M., Barmettler, P., Poletti, D., Endres, M., Schauß, P., Fukuhara, T., Gross, C., Bloch, I., Kollath, C., Kuhr, S.: Light-cone-like spreading of correlations in a quantum many-body system. Nature481(7382), 484–487 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10748

  16. [25]

    Nature Physics 9(10), 640–643 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1038/ nphys2739

    Langen, T., Geiger, R., Kuhnert, M., Rauer, B., Schmiedmayer, J.: Local emergence of thermal correlations in an isolated quantum many-body system. Nature Physics 9(10), 640–643 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1038/ nphys2739

  17. [26]

    Kim, H., Huse, D.A.: Ballistic spreading of entanglement in a diffusive nonintegrable system. Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 127205 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.127205

  18. [27]

    Nature511(7508), 202–205 (2014) https: //doi.org/10.1038/nature13461

    Jurcevic, P., Lanyon, B.P., Hauke, P., Hempel, C., Zoller, P., Blatt, R., Roos, C.F.: Quasiparticle engineering and entanglement propagation in a quantum many-body system. Nature511(7508), 202–205 (2014) https: //doi.org/10.1038/nature13461

  19. [28]

    light-cone

    Bonnes, L., Essler, F.H.L., Läuchli, A.M.: “light-cone” dynamics after quantum quenches in spin chains. Physical Review Letters 113(18) (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.113.187203

  20. [29]

    Science 353(6301), 794–800 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf6725

    Kaufman, A.M., Tai, M.E., Lukin, A., Rispoli, M., Schittko, R., Preiss, P.M., Greiner, M.: Quantum ther- malization through entanglement in an isolated many-body system. Science 353(6301), 794–800 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf6725

  21. [30]

    Rieger, H., Iglói, F.: Semiclassical theory for quantum quenches in finite transverse ising chains. Phys. Rev. B 84, 165117 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.165117

  22. [32]

    Bravyi, S.: Upper bounds on entangling rates of bipartite hamiltonians. Phys. Rev. A 76, 052319 (2007) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.76.052319

  23. [33]

    Van Acoleyen, K., Mariën, M., Verstraete, F.: Entanglement rates and area laws. Phys. Rev. Lett.111, 170501 (2013) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.170501

  24. [34]

    Communications in Mathematical Physics 346, 35–73 (2016)

    Mariën, M., Audenaert, K.M., Van Acoleyen, K., Verstraete, F.: Entanglement rates and the stability of the 17 area law for the entanglement entropy. Communications in Mathematical Physics 346, 35–73 (2016)

  25. [35]

    Shi, Z.D.: Bounds on rényi entropy growth in many-body quantum systems. Phys. Rev. A 109, 042404 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.109.042404

  26. [36]

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.00743

    Toniolo, D., Bose, S.: The dynamical𝛼-Rényi entropies of local Hamiltonians grow at most linearly in time (2025). https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.00743

  27. [37]

    Physical Review Letters 122(25) (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.122.250602

    Rakovszky, T., Pollmann, F., Keyserlingk, C.W.: Sub-ballistic growth of rényi entropies due to diffusion. Physical Review Letters 122(25) (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.122.250602

  28. [38]

    IOP SciNotes1(3), 035205 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1088/2633-1357/abd1e2

    Huang, Y.: Dynamics of rényi entanglement entropy in diffusive qudit systems. IOP SciNotes1(3), 035205 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1088/2633-1357/abd1e2

  29. [39]

    Communications Physics 3(1) (2020) https://doi

    Žnidarič, M.: Entanglement growth in diffusive systems. Communications Physics 3(1) (2020) https://doi. org/10.1038/s42005-020-0366-7

  30. [40]

    McCoy, B.M., Wu, T.T.: Two-dimensional ising field theory in a magnetic field: Breakup of the cut in the two-point function. Phys. Rev. D 18, 1259–1267 (1978) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.18.1259

  31. [41]

    Nuclear Physics B 473(3), 469–508 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(96) 00265-9

    Delfino, G., Mussardo, G., Simonetti, P.: Non-integrable quantum field theories as perturbations of cer- tain integrable models. Nuclear Physics B 473(3), 469–508 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1016/0550-3213(96) 00265-9

  32. [42]

    Journal of statistical physics 110(3-6), 527–590 (2003)

    Fonseca, P., Zamolodchikov, A.: Ising field theory in a magnetic field: analytic properties of the free energy. Journal of statistical physics 110(3-6), 527–590 (2003)

  33. [43]

    Journal of Statistical Physics 131(5), 917–939 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-008-9495-1

    Rutkevich, S.B.: Energy spectrum of bound-spinons in the quantum ising spin-chain ferromagnet. Journal of Statistical Physics 131(5), 917–939 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10955-008-9495-1

  34. [44]

    Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 45(12), 125204 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/45/12/125204

    Vinayak, Žnidarič, M.: Subsystem dynamics under random hamiltonian evolution. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical 45(12), 125204 (2012) https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/45/12/125204

  35. [45]

    Chamon, C., Hamma, A., Mucciolo, E.R.: Emergent irreversibility and entanglement spectrum statistics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 112, 240501 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.240501

  36. [46]

    Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2014(6), 06001 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/ 2014/06/p06001

    Torlai, G., Tagliacozzo, L., De Chiara, G.: Dynamics of the entanglement spectrum in spin chains. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment2014(6), 06001 (2014) https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/ 2014/06/p06001

  37. [47]

    Physical Review B 89(10) (2014) https: //doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.89.104303

    Canovi, E., Ercolessi, E., Naldesi, P., Taddia, L., Vodola, D.: Dynamics of entanglement entropy and entanglement spectrum crossing a quantum phase transition. Physical Review B 89(10) (2014) https: //doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.89.104303

  38. [48]

    Physical Review B 96(2) (2017) https: //doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.96.020408

    Yang, Z.-C., Hamma, A., Giampaolo, S.M., Mucciolo, E.R., Chamon, C.: Entanglement complexity in quantum many-body dynamics, thermalization, and localization. Physical Review B 96(2) (2017) https: //doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.96.020408

  39. [49]

    Chang, P.-Y., Chen, X., Gopalakrishnan, S., Pixley, J.H.: Evolution of entanglement spectra under generic quantum dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 190602 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.190602

  40. [50]

    Physical Review B101(24) (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.101

    Surace, J., Tagliacozzo, L., Tonni, E.: Operator content of entanglement spectra in the transverse field ising chain after global quenches. Physical Review B101(24) (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.101. 241107

  41. [51]

    SciPost Physics 13(4) (2022) https://doi.org/10.21468/scipostphys.13.4.080

    Klein Kvorning, T., Herviou, L., Bardarson, J.H.: Time-evolution of local information: thermalization 18 dynamics of local observables. SciPost Physics 13(4) (2022) https://doi.org/10.21468/scipostphys.13.4.080

  42. [52]

    Zhang, J., Rajabpour, M.A., Heyl, M., Khasseh, R.: Subsystem evolution speed as indicator of relaxation. Phys. Rev. B 111, 140410 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.111.L140410

  43. [53]

    Banerjee, A.: Non-markovianity of subsystem dynamics in isolated quantum many-body systems. Phys. Rev. B 112, 014302 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/q8h3-mkzr

  44. [54]

    Vidal, G.: Efficient simulation of one-dimensional quantum many-body systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 93, 040502 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.040502

  45. [55]

    Annals of Physics 326(1), 96–192 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2010.09.012

    Schollwöck, U.: The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states. Annals of Physics 326(1), 96–192 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2010.09.012

  46. [56]

    Annals of Physics411, 167998 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2019.167998

    Paeckel, S., Köhler, T., Swoboda, A., Manmana, S.R., Schollwöck, U., Hubig, C.: Time-evolution methods for matrix-product states. Annals of Physics411, 167998 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2019.167998

  47. [57]

    Cambridge University Press, UK (2023)

    Xiang, T.: Density Matrix and Tensor Network Renormalization. Cambridge University Press, UK (2023)

  48. [58]

    Osborne, T.J.: Efficient approximation of the dynamics of one-dimensional quantum spin systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 157202 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.157202

  49. [59]

    Physical Review Letters 97(15) (2006) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.97.150404

    Eisert, J., Osborne, T.J.: General entanglement scaling laws from time evolution. Physical Review Letters 97(15) (2006) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.97.150404

  50. [60]

    Schuch, N., Wolf, M.M., Verstraete, F., Cirac, J.I.: Entropy scaling and simulability by matrix product states. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 030504 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.030504

  51. [61]

    New Journal of Physics 10(3), 033032 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/10/3/ 033032

    Schuch, N., Wolf, M.M., Vollbrecht, K.G.H., Cirac, J.I.: On entropy growth and the hardness of simulat- ing time evolution. New Journal of Physics 10(3), 033032 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1088/1367-2630/10/3/ 033032

  52. [62]

    National Science Review 3(2), 170–172 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nww023

    Kuhr, S.: Quantum-gas microscopes: a new tool for cold-atom quantum simulators. National Science Review 3(2), 170–172 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nww023

  53. [63]

    Reports on Progress in Physics 79(5), 054401 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/79/5/054401

    Ott, H.: Single atom detection in ultracold quantum gases: a review of current progress. Reports on Progress in Physics 79(5), 054401 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/79/5/054401

  54. [64]

    Nature Physics17(12), 1316–1323 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01370-5

    Gross, C., Bakr, W.S.: Quantum gas microscopy for single atom and spin detection. Nature Physics17(12), 1316–1323 (2021) https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-021-01370-5

  55. [65]

    Cambridge University Press, UK (2018)

    Watrous, J.: The Theory of Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press, UK (2018)

  56. [66]

    Cambridge University Press, UK (2025)

    Gour, G.: Quantum Resource Theories. Cambridge University Press, UK (2025)

  57. [67]

    Physics Reports 474(1–6), 1–75 (2009) https://doi.org/10

    Gühne, O., Tóth, G.: Entanglement detection. Physics Reports 474(1–6), 1–75 (2009) https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.physrep.2009.02.004

  58. [68]

    Horodecki, R., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, M., Horodecki, K.: Quantum entanglement. Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 865–942 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.81.865

  59. [69]

    Nature 528(7580), 77–83 (2015)

    Islam, R., Ma, R., Preiss, P.M., Eric Tai, M., Lukin, A., Rispoli, M., Greiner, M.: Measuring entanglement entropy in a quantum many-body system. Nature 528(7580), 77–83 (2015)

  60. [70]

    Quantum Info

    Plenio, M.B., Virmani, S.: An introduction to entanglement measures. Quantum Info. Comput. 7(1), 1–51 (2007) 19

  61. [71]

    Physical Review Letters 83(5), 1046–1049 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.83.1046

    Vidal, G.: Entanglement of pure states for a single copy. Physical Review Letters 83(5), 1046–1049 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.83.1046

  62. [72]

    Eisert, J., Cramer, M.: Single-copy entanglement in critical quantum spin chains. Phys. Rev. A 72, 042112 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.72.042112

  63. [73]

    Orús, R., Latorre, J.I., Eisert, J., Cramer, M.: Half the entanglement in critical systems is distillable from a single specimen. Phys. Rev. A 73, 060303 (2006) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.73.060303

  64. [74]

    Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experi- ment 2005(11), 11002–11002 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2005/11/p11002

    Peschel, I., Zhao, J.: On single-copy entanglement. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experi- ment 2005(11), 11002–11002 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2005/11/p11002

  65. [75]

    Physical Review B 109(22) (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.109.224308

    Kehrein, S.: Page curve entanglement dynamics in an analytically solvable model. Physical Review B 109(22) (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.109.224308

  66. [76]

    Li, L.H., Kehrein, S., Gopalakrishnan, S.: Sharp page transitions in generic hamiltonian dynamics. Phys. Rev. B 112, 014307 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/vnzh-y22h

  67. [77]

    Jha, R., Manmana, S.R., Kehrein, S.: Page curve and entanglement dynamics in an interacting fermionic chain. Phys. Rev. B 111, 235140 (2025) https://doi.org/10.1103/lt5c-pn14

  68. [78]

    Peres, A.: Separability criterion for density matrices. Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 1413–1415 (1996) https://doi.org/ 10.1103/PhysRevLett.77.1413

  69. [79]

    Physics Letters A 223(1–2), 1–8 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1016/s0375-9601(96)00706-2

    Horodecki, M., Horodecki, P., Horodecki, R.: Separability of mixed states: necessary and sufficient conditions. Physics Letters A 223(1–2), 1–8 (1996) https://doi.org/10.1016/s0375-9601(96)00706-2

  70. [80]

    Vidal, G., Werner, R.F.: Computable measure of entanglement. Phys. Rev. A 65, 032314 (2002) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevA.65.032314

  71. [81]

    Horodecki, P., Ekert, A.: Method for direct detection of quantum entanglement. Phys. Rev. Lett.89, 127902 (2002) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.127902

  72. [82]

    Lim, H.-T., Kim, Y.-S., Ra, Y.-S., Bae, J., Kim, Y.-H.: Experimental realization of an approximate partial transpose for photonic two-qubit systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 160401 (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.107.160401

  73. [83]

    Reports on Progress in Physics 80(10), 104001 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aa7d45

    Bae, J.: Designing quantum information processing via structural physical approximation. Reports on Progress in Physics 80(10), 104001 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6633/aa7d45

  74. [84]

    Annals of Physics 446, 169113 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop

    Kumari, A., Adhikari, S.: Structured negativity: A physically realizable measure of entanglement based on structural physical approximation. Annals of Physics 446, 169113 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aop. 2022.169113

  75. [85]

    Founda- tions of Physics Letters 10, 113–117 (1997)

    Busch, P., Lahti, P.J.: Remarks on separability of compound quantum systems and time reversal. Founda- tions of Physics Letters 10, 113–117 (1997)

  76. [86]

    https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9707041

    Sanpera, A., Tarrach, R., Vidal, G.: Quantum separability, time reversal and canonical decompositions (1997). https://arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/9707041

  77. [87]

    Simon, R.: Peres-horodecki separability criterion for continuous variable systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2726–2729 (2000) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.2726

  78. [88]

    Shapourian, H., Shiozaki, K., Ryu, S.: Partial time-reversal transformation and entanglement negativity in fermionic systems. Phys. Rev. B 95, 165101 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.165101

  79. [89]

    Shapourian, H., Ryu, S.: Entanglement negativity of fermions: Monotonicity, separability criterion, and 20 classification of few-mode states. Phys. Rev. A 99, 022310 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.99. 022310

  80. [90]

    Quantum Info

    Wootters, W.K.: Entanglement of formation and concurrence. Quantum Info. Comput. 1(1), 27–44 (2001)

  81. [91]

    Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 34(47), 10327–10332 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/34/47/329

    Verstraete, F., Audenaert, K., Dehaene, J., Moor, B.D.: A comparison of the entanglement measures neg- ativity and concurrence. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 34(47), 10327–10332 (2001) https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/34/47/329

  82. [92]

    Nielsen, M.A.: Conditions for a class of entanglement transformations. Phys. Rev. Lett.83, 436–439 (1999) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.436

  83. [93]

    Quantum Info

    Nielsen, M.A., Vidal, G.: Majorization and the interconversion of bipartite states. Quantum Info. Comput. 1(1), 76–93 (2001)

  84. [94]

    Journal of Modern Optics 47(2–3), 355–376 (2000) https://doi.org/10

    Vidal, G.: Entanglement monotones. Journal of Modern Optics 47(2–3), 355–376 (2000) https://doi.org/10. 1080/09500340008244048

  85. [95]

    Physical Review A 72(3) (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.72.032317

    Groisman, B., Popescu, S., Winter, A.: Quantum, classical, and total amount of correlations in a quantum state. Physical Review A 72(3) (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.72.032317

  86. [96]

    Physical Review Letters 100(7) (2008) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.100.070502

    Wolf, M.M., Verstraete, F., Hastings, M.B., Cirac, J.I.: Area laws in quantum systems: Mutual information and correlations. Physical Review Letters 100(7) (2008) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.100.070502

  87. [97]

    Journal of High Energy Physics 2016(2) (2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep02(2016)004

    Hosur, P., Qi, X.-L., Roberts, D.A., Yoshida, B.: Chaos in quantum channels. Journal of High Energy Physics 2016(2) (2016) https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep02(2016)004

  88. [98]

    Physical Review A 97(4) (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.97.042330

    Iyoda, E., Sagawa, T.: Scrambling of quantum information in quantum many-body systems. Physical Review A 97(4) (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.97.042330

  89. [99]

    Physical Review E 98(5) (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.98.052205

    Seshadri, A., Madhok, V., Lakshminarayan, A.: Tripartite mutual information, entanglement, and scram- bling in permutation symmetric systems with an application to quantum chaos. Physical Review E 98(5) (2018) https://doi.org/10.1103/physreve.98.052205

  90. [100]

    Schnaack, O., Bölter, N., Paeckel, S., Manmana, S.R., Kehrein, S., Schmitt, M.: Tripartite information, scram- bling, and the role of hilbert space partitioning in quantum lattice models. Phys. Rev. B100, 224302 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.224302

  91. [101]

    Physical Review A 106(1) (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.106.012435

    Kuno, Y., Orito, T., Ichinose, I.: Information spreading and scrambling in disorder-free multiple-spin- interaction models. Physical Review A 106(1) (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.106.012435

  92. [102]

    Quantum Information Processing21(8) (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11128-022-03641-3

    Sur, S., Subrahmanyam, V.: Information scrambling and redistribution of quantum correlations through dynamical evolution in spin chains. Quantum Information Processing21(8) (2022) https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11128-022-03641-3

  93. [103]

    Quantum Science and Technology8(3), 035006 (2023) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/2058-9565/accd92

    Lo Monaco, G., Innocenti, L., Cilluffo, D., Chisholm, D.A., Lorenzo, S., Palma, G.M.: Quantum scrambling via accessible tripartite information. Quantum Science and Technology8(3), 035006 (2023) https://doi.org/ 10.1088/2058-9565/accd92

  94. [104]

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.11619

    Monaco, G.L., Innocenti, L., Cilluffo, D., Chisholm, D.A., Lorenzo, S., Palma, G.M.: An operational definition of quantum information scrambling (2023). https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.11619

  95. [105]

    Caceffo, F., Alba, V.: Negative tripartite mutual information after quantum quenches in integrable systems. Phys. Rev. B 108, 134434 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.134434

  96. [106]

    Physical Review B 21 108(16) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.108.l161116

    Marić, V., Fagotti, M.: Universality in the tripartite information after global quenches. Physical Review B 21 108(16) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.108.l161116

  97. [107]

    Journal of High Energy Physics 2023(6) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep06(2023) 140

    Marić, V., Fagotti, M.: Universality in the tripartite information after global quenches: (generalised) quantum xy models. Journal of High Energy Physics 2023(6) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep06(2023) 140

  98. [108]

    Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2023(11), 113103 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1742-5468/ad0636

    Marić, V.: Universality in the tripartite information after global quenches: spin flip and semilocal charges. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2023(11), 113103 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1742-5468/ad0636

  99. [109]

    Physical Review Letters 96(11) (2006) https: //doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.96.110404

    Kitaev, A., Preskill, J.: Topological entanglement entropy. Physical Review Letters 96(11) (2006) https: //doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.96.110404

  100. [110]

    Physical Review Letters 96(11) (2006) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.96.110405

    Levin, M., Wen, X.-G.: Detecting topological order in a ground state wave function. Physical Review Letters 96(11) (2006) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.96.110405

  101. [111]

    Annals of Physics57(1), 79–90 (1970) https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(70)90270-8

    Pfeuty, P.: The one-dimensional ising model with a transverse field. Annals of Physics57(1), 79–90 (1970) https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(70)90270-8

  102. [112]

    Physical Review Letters 106(5) (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.106.050405

    Bañuls, M.C., Cirac, J.I., Hastings, M.B.: Strong and weak thermalization of infinite nonintegrable quantum systems. Physical Review Letters 106(5) (2011) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.106.050405

  103. [113]

    Nature Physics 13(3), 246–249 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3934

    Kormos, M., Collura, M., Takács, G., Calabrese, P.: Real-time confinement following a quantum quench to a non-integrable model. Nature Physics 13(3), 246–249 (2016) https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3934

  104. [114]

    Lin, C.-J., Motrunich, O.I.: Quasiparticle explanation of the weak-thermalization regime under quench in a nonintegrable quantum spin chain. Phys. Rev. A95, 023621 (2017) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.95. 023621

  105. [115]

    Castro-Alvaredo, O.A., Lencsés, M., Szécsényi, I.M., Viti, J.: Entanglement oscillations near a quantum critical point. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 230601 (2020) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.230601

  106. [116]

    Liu, F., Lundgren, R., Titum, P., Pagano, G., Zhang, J., Monroe, C., Gorshkov, A.V.: Confined quasiparticle dynamics in long-range interacting quantum spin chains. Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 150601 (2019) https://doi. org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.150601

  107. [117]

    Robinson, N.J., James, A.J.A., Konik, R.M.: Signatures of rare states and thermalization in a theory with confinement. Phys. Rev. B 99, 195108 (2019) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.99.195108

  108. [118]

    Scopa, S., Calabrese, P., Bastianello, A.: Entanglement dynamics in confining spin chains. Phys. Rev. B 105, 125413 (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.125413

  109. [119]

    Nature Communications 13(1) (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-022-35301-6

    Birnkammer, S., Bastianello, A., Knap, M.: Prethermalization in one-dimensional quantum many- body systems with confinement. Nature Communications 13(1) (2022) https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-022-35301-6

  110. [120]

    Knaute, J.: Meson content of entanglement spectra after integrable and nonintegrable quantum quenches. Phys. Rev. B 107, 100303 (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.107.L100303

  111. [121]

    Physical Review A 108(2) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.108.023301

    Kaneko, R., Danshita, I.: Dynamics of correlation spreading in low-dimensional transverse-field ising models. Physical Review A 108(2) (2023) https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.108.023301

  112. [122]

    Robertson, J.H., Senese, R., Essler, F.H.L.: Decay of long-lived oscillations after quantum quenches in gapped interacting quantum systems. Phys. Rev. A 109, 032208 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA. 109.032208 22

  113. [123]

    SciPost Phys

    Fishman, M., White, S.R., Stoudenmire, E.M.: The ITensor Software Library for Tensor Network Calcula- tions. SciPost Phys. Codebases, 4 (2022) https://doi.org/10.21468/SciPostPhysCodeb.4

  114. [124]

    Physical Review Letters 126(4) (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.126.040602

    De Nicola, S., Michailidis, A.A., Serbyn, M.: Entanglement view of dynamical quantum phase transitions. Physical Review Letters 126(4) (2021) https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.126.040602

  115. [125]

    Page, D.N.: Average entropy of a subsystem. Phys. Rev. Lett.71, 1291–1294 (1993) https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.71.1291

  116. [126]

    Annalen der Physik 534(11) (2022) https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.202200064

    Dalmonte, M., Eisler, V., Falconi, M., Vermersch, B.: Entanglement hamiltonians: From field theory to lat- tice models and experiments. Annalen der Physik 534(11) (2022) https://doi.org/10.1002/andp.202200064

  117. [127]

    López, C.E., Romero, G., Lastra, F., Solano, E., Retamal, J.C.: Sudden birth versus sudden death of entan- glement in multipartite systems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 080503 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 101.080503

  118. [128]

    EPL (Europhysics Letters) 82(4), 40002 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/82/40002

    Rau, A.R.P., Ali, M., Alber, G.: Hastening, delaying, or averting sudden death of quantum entanglement. EPL (Europhysics Letters) 82(4), 40002 (2008) https://doi.org/10.1209/0295-5075/82/40002

  119. [129]

    Science 323(5914), 598–601 (2009) https://doi.org/10

    Yu, T., Eberly, J.H.: Sudden death of entanglement. Science 323(5914), 598–601 (2009) https://doi.org/10. 1126/science.1167343

  120. [130]

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2406

    Hiesmayr, B.C., Popp, C., Sutter, T.C.: Bipartite Bound Entanglement (2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2406. 13491

  121. [131]

    Journal of High Energy Physics 2021(6) (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep06(2021)156

    Su, K., Zhang, P., Zhai, H.: Page curve from non-markovianity. Journal of High Energy Physics 2021(6) (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep06(2021)156

  122. [132]

    Journal of High Energy Physics 2021(3) (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep03(2021)198

    Dadras, P., Kitaev, A.: Perturbative calculations of entanglement entropy. Journal of High Energy Physics 2021(3) (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep03(2021)198

  123. [133]

    Journal of High Energy Physics 2021(4) (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep04(2021)215

    Chen, Y.: Entropy linear response theory with non-markovian bath. Journal of High Energy Physics 2021(4) (2021) https://doi.org/10.1007/jhep04(2021)215

  124. [134]

    Glatthard, J.: Page-curve-like entanglement dynamics in open quantum systems. Phys. Rev. D109, 081901 (2024) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.109.L081901

  125. [135]

    https:// arxiv.org/abs/2501.09082

    Glatthard, J.: Thermodynamics of the Page curve in Markovian open quantum systems (2025). https:// arxiv.org/abs/2501.09082

  126. [136]

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.12110

    Ganguly, K., Gopalakrishnan, P., Naik, A., Agarwalla, B.K., Kulkarni, M.: Quantum trajectories and Page- curve entanglement dynamics (2025). https://arxiv.org/abs/2501.12110

  127. [137]

    https: //arxiv.org/abs/2504.14675

    Ray, T., Dhar, A., Kulkarni, M.: Page curve like dynamics in Interacting Quantum Systems (2025). https: //arxiv.org/abs/2504.14675

  128. [138]

    Scott, A.J.: Multipartite entanglement, quantum-error-correcting codes, and entangling power of quantum evolutions. Phys. Rev. A 69, 052330 (2004) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.69.052330

  129. [139]

    https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.10625

    Amico, L., Korepin, V., Hamma, A., Giampaolo, S.M., Franchini, F.: Local Convertibility in quantum spin systems (2022). https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.10625

  130. [140]

    Physical Review A 71(3) (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.71.034301

    Latorre, J.I., Lütken, C.A., Rico, E., Vidal, G.: Fine-grained entanglement loss along renormalization-group flows. Physical Review A 71(3) (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.71.034301

  131. [141]

    Orús, R.: Entanglement and majorization in(1+1) -dimensional quantum systems. Phys. Rev. A71, 052327 (2005) https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.71.052327 23

  132. [142]

    IEEE Trans

    Yuan, H.: Characterization of majorization monotone quantum dynamics. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control. 55(4), 955–959 (2010) https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.2010.2041619

  133. [143]

    Physical Review A 106(1) (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.106.012426 24

    Lostaglio, M., Korzekwa, K.: Continuous thermomajorization and a complete set of laws for markovian thermal processes. Physical Review A 106(1) (2022) https://doi.org/10.1103/physreva.106.012426 24

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.