Pith. sign in

REVIEW

SqueezeNext: Hardware-Aware Neural Network Design

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1803.10615 v2 pith:VYLHZCA3 submitted 2018-03-23 cs.NE

classification cs.NE
keywords timesaccuracyneuralnetworkdesignparameterssqueezenextable
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
abstract

One of the main barriers for deploying neural networks on embedded systems has been large memory and power consumption of existing neural networks. In this work, we introduce SqueezeNext, a new family of neural network architectures whose design was guided by considering previous architectures such as SqueezeNet, as well as by simulation results on a neural network accelerator. This new network is able to match AlexNet's accuracy on the ImageNet benchmark with $112\times$ fewer parameters, and one of its deeper variants is able to achieve VGG-19 accuracy with only 4.4 Million parameters, ($31\times$ smaller than VGG-19). SqueezeNext also achieves better top-5 classification accuracy with $1.3\times$ fewer parameters as compared to MobileNet, but avoids using depthwise-separable convolutions that are inefficient on some mobile processor platforms. This wide range of accuracy gives the user the ability to make speed-accuracy tradeoffs, depending on the available resources on the target hardware. Using hardware simulation results for power and inference speed on an embedded system has guided us to design variations of the baseline model that are $2.59\times$/$8.26\times$ faster and $2.25\times$/$7.5\times$ more energy efficient as compared to SqueezeNet/AlexNet without any accuracy degradation.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Pith tools