REVIEW 2 cited by
Linguistic Interpretability of Transformer-based Language Models: a systematic review
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
Signed reviews
read the original abstract
Language models based on the Transformer architecture achieve excellent results in many language-related tasks, such as text classification or sentiment analysis. However, despite the architecture of these models being well-defined, little is known about how their internal computations help them achieve their results. This renders these models, as of today, a type of 'black box' systems. There is, however, a line of research -- 'interpretability' -- aiming to learn how information is encoded inside these models. More specifically, there is work dedicated to studying whether Transformer-based models possess knowledge of linguistic phenomena similar to human speakers -- an area we call 'linguistic interpretability' of these models. In this survey we present a comprehensive analysis of 160 research works, spread across multiple languages and models -- including multilingual ones -- that attempt to discover linguistic information from the perspective of several traditional Linguistics disciplines: Syntax, Morphology, Lexico-Semantics and Discourse. Our survey fills a gap in the existing interpretability literature, which either not focus on linguistic knowledge in these models or present some limitations -- e.g. only studying English-based models. Our survey also focuses on Pre-trained Language Models not further specialized for a downstream task, with an emphasis on works that use interpretability techniques that explore models' internal representations.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
The Grammar of Transformers: A Systematic Review of Interpretability Research on Syntactic Knowledge in Language Models
A systematic review of 337 articles shows Transformers handle formal syntax well but perform worse and more variably at the syntax-semantics interface, with the field over-reliant on English and BERT.
-
Probing the Embedding Space of Transformers via Minimal Token Perturbations
Minimal single-token substitutions in BERT show that common tokens induce small embedding shifts, rare tokens induce larger shifts, and perturbation effects grow with layer depth, which the authors interpret as suppor...
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.