Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Fixed Effects Binary Choice Models: Estimation and Inference with Long Panels

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 1904.04217 v3 pith:W2AZJ7VJ submitted 2019-04-08 econ.EM

classification econ.EM
keywords biasbinarychoiceeffectsfixedmodelspanelscomputational
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Empirical economists are often deterred from the application of fixed effects binary choice models mainly for two reasons: the incidental parameter problem and the computational challenge even in moderately large panels. Using the example of binary choice models with individual and time fixed effects, we show how both issues can be alleviated by combining asymptotic bias corrections with computational advances. Because unbalancedness is often encountered in applied work, we investigate its consequences on the finite sample properties of various (bias corrected) estimators. In simulation experiments we find that analytical bias corrections perform particularly well, whereas split-panel jackknife estimators can be severely biased in unbalanced panels.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Inference for Fixed Effects Estimators when Panels are Unbalanced

    econ.EM 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    In unbalanced panels, two-way fixed-effects M-estimators have incidental-parameter plus feedback bias, and a proposed analytical correction restores correctly centered normal inference without knowing which regressors...

Pith tools