Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 122 references

Spatially resolved [CII]-gas conversion factor in early galaxies

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-16 · deepseek-v4-flash

Pith's one-line read A constant [CII]-to-gas conversion factor flattens the resolved star-formation law and inflates depletion times up to 4x in high-redshift galaxies.

desk verdict Useful, internally consistent simulation-based paper giving a resolved [CII]-to-gas recipe and a clear warning about constant-alpha bias; treat the fitted relation as simulation-dependent until the sub-grid density PDF is stress-tested. read the letter →

arxiv 2504.14001 v2 pith:W4T2ISA6 submitted 2025-04-18 astro-ph.GA

classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxies:evolutionhigh-redshiftISM[CII]158micronemissiongasconversionfactorKennicutt-SchmidtrelationdepletiontimeEpochofReionization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether a single, constant [CII]-to-gas conversion factor can recover gas surface densities in galaxies at redshift 4–9, and answers no. Using a cosmological zoom-in simulation with roughly 30-parsec resolution, it shows that the resolved conversion factor $W_{[\rm CII]} = \Sigma_{\rm gas}/\Sigma_{[\rm CII]}$ falls in bright, dense, metal-rich, and bursty patches of the interstellar medium, following the fitted relation $\log W_{[\rm CII]} = -0.355\log\Sigma_{[\rm CII]} - 0.324\log Z + 3.37$. Applying a constant global factor in resolved maps therefore overestimates gas surface density exactly where [CII] is brightest, flattening the star-formation law (the Kennicutt-Schmidt relation) and overestimating the gas depletion time by up to a factor of about four. The paper provides ready-to-use brightness- and metallicity-dependent conversion relations so that ALMA and JWST observations of early galaxies can avoid this bias.

What carries the argument

The object that carries the argument is the spatially resolved conversion factor $W_{[\rm CII]}\equiv \Sigma_{\rm gas}/\Sigma_{[\rm CII]}$, together with the fitted empirical relation $\log W_{[\rm CII]} = -0.355\log\Sigma_{[\rm CII]} - 0.324\log Z + 3.37$ (Eq. 10). The physical machinery behind it is an analytic model for [CII] surface brightness that expresses $\Sigma_{[\rm CII]}$ as a function of gas density, metallicity, and burstiness, yielding $W_{[\rm CII]}\propto 1/(nZ)$ at $Z<0.2\,Z_\odot$ and a $\kappa_s$-dependent scaling above that threshold. The relation is calibrated on [CII] emission computed with Cloudy PDR grids, interpolated over a sub-grid log-normal density distribution whose dispersion is set by the local Mach number.

What would settle it

Compare spatially resolved [CII] maps with independent gas surface density maps (from rest-frame dust continuum, CO, or dynamical modelling) across bright and faint patches of a $z\approx5-7$ galaxy: if $W_{[\rm CII]}$ does not decrease with increasing $\Sigma_{[\rm CII]}$ at fixed metallicity, or if the Kennicutt-Schmidt slope measured with a constant $\alpha_{[\rm CII]}$ is not flatter than the slope from the independent gas tracer, the central claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the [CII]-to-gas conversion factor is not constant across the interstellar medium of early galaxies: $W_{[\rm CII]}=\Sigma_{\rm gas}/\Sigma_{[\rm CII]}$ anticorrelates with local gas density, metallicity, and, above $Z\approx 0.2\,Z_\odot$, with the star-formation burstiness $\kappa_s$, because the same conditions that make a patch bright in [CII] also raise its emissivity per unit gas. The consequence is $W_{[\rm CII]} \propto \Sigma_{[\rm CII]}^{-0.5}$ over the simulated sample. Replacing the standard constant $\alpha_{[\rm CII]}=31\,M_\odot/L_\odot$ with the resolved relation restores the intrinsic ~1.4 Kennicutt-Schmidt slope and lowers the inferred mean depletion time from about 0.4 Gyr to 0.1 Gyr.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the unresolved gas inside each 30-parsec cell has a log-normal density distribution whose width is set by the local Mach number; because [CII] emission is most sensitive near gas densities of about a thousand particles per cubic centimetre, a different small-scale density structure would change the fitted $W_{[\rm CII]}$ relation and the size of the predicted biases.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Resolved ALMA observations of [CII] at $z\approx4-9$ should convert $\Sigma_{[\rm CII]}$ to gas surface density using the fitted $W_{[\rm CII]}(\Sigma_{[\rm CII]},Z)$ rather than a constant $\alpha_{[\rm CII]}$.
  • Kennicutt-Schmidt slopes measured from [CII] with a single conversion factor will come out artificially flat; the true, steeper slope is recovered once the brightness-dependence of $W_{[\rm CII]}$ is included.
  • Gas depletion times inferred from unresolved [CII] in bursty galaxies can be overestimated by up to roughly $4\times$, so the census of how quickly high-redshift galaxies consume their gas may need revising.
  • More compact galaxies, with smaller $r_{e,[\rm CII]}$ and higher effective [CII] surface brightness, have systematically lower global $\alpha_{[\rm CII]}$; unresolved gas masses should therefore be derived with a compactness-dependent conversion factor.
  • The non-detection of [CII] in compact, metal-poor JWST-selected galaxies at $z>10$ sets tight upper limits on their cold gas content, pointing to very short depletion times.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same bias likely affects resolved [CII] studies at lower redshift: any galaxy whose bright centre dominates the [CII] emission will show a flattened KS slope when a constant conversion factor is applied, so the prediction can be checked against local samples with independent gas tracers.
  • A direct observational falsifier is to measure $W_{[\rm CII]}$ in bright and faint patches of a single $z\sim5-7$ galaxy using independent gas surface densities from dust continuum or dynamical modelling; the slope of $\log W_{[\rm CII]}$ versus $\log\Sigma_{[\rm CII]}$ should be about $-0.36$.
  • If the relation holds, the inferred cold-gas masses of compact $z>10$ [CII]-undetected galaxies become even lower than a constant-$\alpha$ analysis suggests, sharpening the claimed tension between their stellar masses and depletion times.
  • The fitted relation could be ported to other density-sensitive fine-structure lines (e.g. [O III] 88 μm), predicting that their conversion factors also drop in bright, metal-rich patches and similarly bias resolved KS studies.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper uses the SERRA cosmological zoom-in simulation, which features on-the-fly radiative transfer and ~30 pc spatial resolution, to compute [CII] emission with Cloudy post-processing for 98 galaxies at 4<z<9. The authors derive the global conversion factor alpha_CII = M_gas/L_CII and the spatially resolved W_CII = Sigma_gas/Sigma_CII, finding that alpha_CII decreases with metallicity and that W_CII anticorrelates with [CII] surface brightness and metallicity. Their central quantitative result is the fitted relation in Eq. (10), log W_CII = -0.355 log Sigma_CII - 0.324 log Z + 3.37, and they argue that applying a constant alpha_CII overestimates Sigma_gas in bright [CII] patches, thereby flattening the resolved Kennicutt-Schmidt relation and overestimating the depletion time by up to a factor of about 4. They further provide relations connecting global alpha_CII to galaxy compactness and effective [CII] surface brightness.

Significance. If the central relation holds, the paper provides a practical, physically motivated correction for spatially resolved [CII]-based gas mass measurements in the Epoch of Reionization, with direct relevance for ALMA and JWST observing programs. The analysis builds on a high-resolution simulated sample with on-the-fly radiative transfer, an explicit Cloudy treatment of PDRs, and a physically transparent comparison against the F19 analytic model; the fitting formulae in Table 1 are ready to use. The paper also makes a falsifiable prediction: the slope of the resolved KS relation derived from [CII] should steepen when a spatially varying W_CII is adopted. However, the central quantitative claim currently depends on the assumed sub-grid density PDF and on sign-constrained regression, so the significance of the paper is conditional on the robustness checks requested below.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 4.1 and Eq. (10)]
  2. [Sec. 4.2, Eq. (10)]
  3. [Sec. 5.1, Fig. 7]
minor comments (5)
  1. [Sec. 2.2]
  2. [Sec. 3]
  3. [Table 1]
  4. [Fig. 5]
  5. [Sec. 5.1, Fig. 7]

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Minor in-sample circularity: Fig. 7's KS 'recovery' applies Eq. 10 to the same pixels from which it was fitted; the t_dep bias is a consequence of the fit, not an independent prediction.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Sec. 5.1, Fig. 7 (Eq. 10 applied to SERRA pixels)]
    "In contrast, when we apply our best-fit W[CII]–Σ[CII] relation (Eq. 10) to convert Σ[CII] into Σgas, we successfully recover the intrinsic KS relation from SERRA, reinforcing the validity of Eq. 10 and its use in spatially resolved observations, both at high-z and in the local Universe."

    Equation 10 is obtained in Sec. 4.2 by regressing log W[CII] = log Σgas − log Σ[CII] (by definition of W[CII]) on log Σ[CII] and log Z for the same 30 pc SERRA pixels. Applying the best-fit relation back to those pixels and 'recovering' the KS relation is therefore an in-sample consistency check, not an independent validation. The same is true of the ~4× t_dep shift: once the fitted negative slope A = −0.355 is accepted, the overestimate in bright Σ[CII] regions follows algebraically. The underlying W[CII] anticorrelation is still a genuine simulation result, so this is a mild circularity rather than a forced central claim.

full rationale

The central W[CII](Σ[CII], Z) relation is an empirical fit to the SERRA+Cloudy post-processing, and the global α[CII] values are compared against external observational constraints (Zanella et al. 2018; Rizzo et al. 2021; Kaasinen et al. 2024), so the main quantitative content does not reduce to a self-citation or to the F19 analytic model used only for intuition. The sub-grid log-normal density PDF is a stated modeling assumption, not a circular step, and the paper openly flags the power-law-tail caveat. The only identifiable circularity is the in-sample 'recovery' in Sec. 5.1: Eq. 10 was fitted to the same pixels to which it is then applied to reconstruct the KS relation and quantify the t_dep bias. That does not invalidate the fit or the derived bias, but it means the recovery is a consistency check, not independent confirmation.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper adds best-fit coefficients but invents no new physical entities. The main epistemic load rests on the SERRA simulation and the sub-grid Cloudy models, which are prior art from the same group; the resolved relation is fitted rather than derived from independent first principles.

free parameters (9)
  • Eq.1 slope (alpha_CII vs log Z) = -0.39 +/- 0.04
    Fitted to the 98 SERRA galaxies; drives the claim that alpha_CII decreases with metallicity.
  • Eq.1 intercept = 0.67 +/- 0.06
    Normalization of the alpha_CII-Z relation.
  • Eq.10 A (slope on log Sigma_CII) = -0.355 (+0.003, -0.017)
    Central resolved W_CII relation; the negative slope produces the overestimate bias for constant alpha.
  • Eq.10 B (slope on log Z) = -0.324 (+0.048, -0.004)
    Metallicity dependence of W_CII.
  • Eq.10 C (intercept) = 3.37 (+0.191, -0.026)
    Normalization of Eq. 10.
  • Eq.10 intrinsic scatter sigma = 0.184
    Scatter of the W_CII relation; used for error estimates.
  • Eq.11 slope (W_CII vs Sigma_CII only) = -0.51 +/- 0.001
    Simplified relation without metallicity; yields W proportional to Sigma^-0.5.
  • Eq.12 slope (alpha_CII vs r_e,CII) = 0.69 +/- 0.08
    Compactness dependence of global alpha_CII.
  • Eq.13 slope (alpha_CII vs Sigma_CII,eff) = -0.36 +/- 0.06
    Effective surface brightness dependence of global alpha_CII.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The SERRA zoom-in simulations with on-the-fly radiative transfer and resolved about 30 pc ISM accurately represent high-z galaxies.
    The entire analysis is a post-processing of these simulations; if the simulated ISM properties are unrealistic, the W_CII relations are not transferable to real galaxies.
  • domain assumption The sub-grid log-normal density PDF, parametrized by the local Mach number, captures the small-scale density distribution relevant for [CII] emission.
    Used in Sec. 2.2 to compute [CII] from each 30 pc cell; the [CII] luminosity depends on the density distribution because of the critical density near 1e3 cm^-3.
  • domain assumption The Cloudy PDR models with the assumed SED (10 Myr Starburst99) and gas slab geometry yield accurate [CII] intensities.
    The [CII] maps are computed by interpolating these grids; uncertainties in the SED or PDR structure propagate into W_CII.
  • domain assumption Dust abundance scales as D = Z D_sun with solar abundance ratios.
    Adopted in Sec. 2.1; this sets the dust shielding that drives the Z-dependence of [CII] emission.
  • domain assumption The Kennicutt-Schmidt relation (Eq. 5) connects Sigma_gas, Sigma_SFR, and kappa_s in the F19 analytic model.
    Used in Sec. 4.1 to derive the kappa_s scaling; it is an empirical law fitted locally and assumed to hold at high-z.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spatially resolved [CII]-gas conversion factor in early galaxies." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/W4T2ISA6

@misc{pith2026250414001,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spatially resolved [CII]-gas conversion factor in early galaxies},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/W4T2ISA6}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2504.14001}
}
abstract

Determining how efficiently gas collapses into stars at high-redshift is key to understanding galaxy evolution in the Epoch of Reionization (EoR). Globally, this process is quantified by the gas depletion time ($t_{dep}$); on resolved scales, by the slope and normalization of the Kennicutt-Schmidt (KS) relation. This work explores the global ($\alpha_{[CII]}$) and spatially resolved ($W_{[CII]}$) [CII]-to-gas conversion factors at high-$z$ and their role in inferring reliable gas masses, surface densities, and $t_{dep}$ in the EoR. We select galaxies at 4<z<9 from the SERRA cosmological zoom-in simulation, that features on-the-fly radiative transfer and resolves interstellar medium properties down to $\approx$30 pc. The [CII] emission modelling from photodissociation regions allow us to derive global $\alpha_{ [CII]}$, and maps of $W_{[CII]}$. We study their dependence on gas metallicity (Z), density (n), Mach number (M), and burstiness parameter ($k_s$), and provide best fit relations. The $\alpha_{[CII]}$ decreases with increasing $Z$ and galaxy compactness, while the resolved $W_{[CII]}$ shows two regimes: at $Z< 0.2 Z_\odot$, it anticorrelates with n and Z, but not with $k_s$; above this threshold, it also depends on $k_s$, with more bursty regions showing lower conversion factors. This implies $W_{[CII]}\propto \Sigma_{[CII]}^{-0.5}$, as dense, metal-rich, and bursty regions exhibit higher [CII] surface brightness. Applying a constant $\alpha_{[CII]}$ overestimates $\Sigma_{gas}$ in bright $\Sigma_{[CII]}$ patches, thus flattening the KS slope and overestimating $t_{dep}$ by a factor of $\approx$4.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2504.14001 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left panel: SFR vs M⋆ relation for the SERRA sample (purple points), along with the main sequence parametrization in the CEERS sample in different redshift bins (gray lines), with their 1σ scatter (grey shaded areas), for 100 Myr-averaged SFR (Cole et al. 2025). The SFR vs M⋆ of ALPINE (Khusanova et al. 2021, grey points), and REBELS (Inami et al. 2022; Topping et al. 2022, light blue squares) are also plotted for c… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Cutouts of 5 × 5 kpc2 size centered on three SERRA galaxies. From left to right: Lantana (serra02:55:3350, z ≈ 7.0), Adenia (serra05:67:4486, z ≈ 6.3), and Malva (serra11:94:9149, z ≈ 4.1). From top to bottom: gas surface density, [CII] surface brightness, and spatially resolved conversion factor, W[CII], in units of [(M⊙ kpc−2 )/(L⊙kpc−2 )]. To guide the eye, dashed green, orange, and light blue lines in the Σ[CII]… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The α[CII] vs log Z for the SERRA galaxies (purple points, with inner white square if they fall below the local KS relation) along with the best fit linear regression ±1σ dispersion (purple line and shaded area). Lantana, Adenia, and Malva are plotted in blue, or￾ange, and green respectively. Previous derivations of α[CII] in literature are shown with shaded areas as follows: Zanella et al. (2018) green shaded area … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Spatially resolved conversion factor (W[CII]) as a function of different physical properties within 30 pc size pixels in the ISM of the three galaxies shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The 2D PDF of the spatially resolved conversion factor (W[CII]) as a function of spatially resolved metallicity (Zpix), from the entire sam￾ple of SERRA sources. For comparison, we plot the theoretical estimates obtained with the F19 model assuming gas density log(n/cm…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The spatially resolved conversion (W[CII]) factor as a function of the [CII] surface brightness Σ[CII] within ≈ 30 pc size pixels (col￾ored points) in the ISM of SERRA galaxies. The color-code reflects the metallicity within each pixel. The best fit relation (dispersio…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Left: The spatially resolved KS relation considering ≈ 30×30 pc2 pixels drawn from the entire sample of SERRA galaxies (color coded, ground truth). For each pixel the ΣSFR,Hα is derived from the Hα surface brightness using Kennicutt (1998), and the Σgas is taken from t…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Left: The α[CII] as a function of the [CII] half light radius for the sample considered in this work. Right: The α[CII] as a function of the [CII] effective surface brightness. following logarithmic relations: log(α[CII]/M⊙L −1 ⊙ ) = A log(re,[CII]/kpc) + C, (12) and: …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

122 extracted references · 3 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2017, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1556 magenta , 470, 4750 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.470.4750A

    Accurso , G., Saintonge , A., Catinella , B., et al. 2017, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1556 magenta , 470, 4750 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.470.4750A

  2. [2]

    J., Conselice , C

    Adams , N. J., Conselice , C. J., Austin , D., et al. 2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad2a7b magenta , 965, 169 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...965..169A

  3. [3]

    2025, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250110508A http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.10508 magenta arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2501.10508

    Algera , H., Rowland , L., Stefanon , M., et al. 2025, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250110508A http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.10508 magenta arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2501.10508

  4. [4]

    L., et al

    Arrabal Haro , P., Dickinson , M., Finkelstein , S. L., et al. 2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acdd54 magenta , 951, L22 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...951L..22A

  5. [5]

    J., & Scott , P

    Asplund , M., Grevesse , N., Sauval , A. J., & Scott , P. 2009, http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222 magenta , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2009ARA

  6. [6]

    M., Sip H o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip H o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f magenta aj , 156, 123 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018AJ....156..123A

  7. [7]

    2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348115 magenta , 680, L8 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...680L...8B

    B \'e thermin , M., Accard , C., Guillaume , C., et al. 2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348115 magenta , 680, L8 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...680L...8B

  8. [8]

    2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202037649 magenta , 643, A2 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...643A...2B

    B \'e thermin , M., Fudamoto , Y., Ginolfi , M., et al. 2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202037649 magenta , 643, A2 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...643A...2B

Show all 122 references
  1. [9]

    D., Wolfire , M., & Leroy , A

    Bolatto , A. D., Wolfire , M., & Leroy , A. K. 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140944 magenta , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ARA

  2. [10]

    J., Smit , R., Schouws , S., et al

    Bouwens , R. J., Smit , R., Schouws , S., et al. 2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac5a4a magenta , 931, 160 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...931..160B

  3. [11]

    R., Schleicher , D

    Bovino , S., Grassi , T., Capelo , P. R., Schleicher , D. R. G., & Banerjee , R. 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201628158 magenta , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016A

  4. [12]

    L., Carilli , C., Jones , G., et al

    Capak , P. L., Carilli , C., Jones , G., et al. 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature14500 magenta , 522, 455 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015Natur.522..455C

  5. [13]

    2024, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240920533C http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.20533 magenta arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2409.20533

    Carniani , S., D'Eugenio , F., Ji , X., et al. 2024, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240920533C http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2409.20533 magenta arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2409.20533

  6. [14]

    2018, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018MNRAS.tmp.1042C http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1088 magenta , 1042

    Carniani , S., Maiolino , R., Amorin , R., et al. 2018, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/#abs/2018MNRAS.tmp.1042C http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty1088 magenta , 1042

  7. [15]

    2025, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452282 magenta , 693, A119 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...693A.119C

    Casavecchia , B., Maio , U., P \'e roux , C., & Ciardi , B. 2025, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452282 magenta , 693, A119 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...693A.119C

  8. [16]

    2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/accea5 magenta , 948, L14 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...948L..14C

    Castellano , M., Fontana , A., Treu , T., et al. 2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/accea5 magenta , 948, L14 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...948L..14C

  9. [17]

    W., Papovich , C., Finkelstein , S

    Cole , J. W., Papovich , C., Finkelstein , S. L., et al. 2025, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad9a6a magenta , 979, 193 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025ApJ...979..193C

  10. [18]

    V., Smith , J

    Croxall , K. V., Smith , J. D., Pellegrini , E., et al. 2017, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa8035 magenta , 845, 96 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...845...96C

  11. [19]

    & Kennicutt , Robert C., J

    de los Reyes , M. & Kennicutt , Robert C., J. 2019, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aafa82 magenta , 872, 16 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...872...16D

  12. [20]

    2017, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1879 magenta , 471, 4476 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.471.4476D

    Decataldo , D., Ferrara , A., Pallottini , A., Gallerani , S., & Vallini , L. 2017, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1879 magenta , 471, 4476 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.471.4476D

  13. [21]

    C., Birnboim , Y., Mandelker , N., & Li , Z

    Dekel , A., Sarkar , K. C., Birnboim , Y., Mandelker , N., & Li , Z. 2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad1557 magenta , 523, 3201 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.523.3201D

  14. [22]

    2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038231 magenta , 643, A5 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...643A...5D

    Dessauges-Zavadsky , M., Ginolfi , M., Pozzi , F., et al. 2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038231 magenta , 643, A5 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...643A...5D

  15. [23]

    T., McLure , R

    Donnan , C. T., McLure , R. J., Dunlop , J. S., et al. 2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae2037 magenta , 533, 3222 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.533.3222D

  16. [24]

    2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad2630 magenta , 525, 5631 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.525.5631E

    Ebagezio , S., Seifried , D., Walch , S., et al. 2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad2630 magenta , 525, 5631 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.525.5631E

  17. [25]

    L., Schaerer , D., Lemaux , B

    Faisst , A. L., Schaerer , D., Lemaux , B. C., et al. 2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ab7ccd magenta , 247, 61 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020ApJS..247...61F

  18. [26]

    & Klessen , R

    Federrath , C. & Klessen , R. S. 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/763/1/51 magenta , 763, 51 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...763...51F

  19. [27]

    J., Chatzikos , M., Guzm \'a n , F., et al

    Ferland , G. J., Chatzikos , M., Guzm \'a n , F., et al. 2017, , 53, 385 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017RMxAA..53..385F

  20. [28]

    2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348321 magenta , 684, A207 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...684A.207F

    Ferrara , A. 2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348321 magenta , 684, A207 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...684A.207F

  21. [29]

    2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad1095 magenta , 522, 3986 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.522.3986F

    Ferrara , A., Pallottini , A., & Dayal , P. 2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad1095 magenta , 522, 3986 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.522.3986F

  22. [30]

    2019, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2031 magenta , 489, 1 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.489....1F

    Ferrara , A., Vallini , L., Pallottini , A., et al. 2019, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz2031 magenta , 489, 1 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.489....1F

  23. [31]

    L., Bagley , M., Song , M., et al

    Finkelstein , S. L., Bagley , M., Song , M., et al. 2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac3aed magenta , 928, 52 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...928...52F

  24. [32]

    L., Leung , G

    Finkelstein , S. L., Leung , G. C. K., Bagley , M. B., et al. 2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ad4495 magenta , 969, L2 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...969L...2F

  25. [33]

    2013, emcee: The MCMC Hammer , Astrophysics Source Code Library

    Foreman-Mackey , D., Conley , A., Meierjurgen Farr , W., et al. 2013, emcee: The MCMC Hammer , Astrophysics Source Code Library

  26. [34]

    A., Walter , F., et al

    Fudamoto , Y., Oesch , P. A., Walter , F., et al. 2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae556 magenta , 530, 340 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.530..340F

  27. [35]

    2025, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250116418G http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.16418 magenta arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2501.16418

    Gelli , V., Pallottini , A., Salvadori , S., et al. 2025, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250116418G http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.16418 magenta arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2501.16418

  28. [36]

    P., & Klessen , R

    Girichidis , P., Konstandin , L., Whitworth , A. P., & Klessen , R. S. 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/781/2/91 magenta , 781, 91 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014ApJ...781...91G

  29. [37]

    L., et al

    Glazer , K., Brad a c , M., Sanders , R. L., et al. 2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae1178 magenta , 531, 945 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.531..945G

  30. [38]

    Grassi , T., Bovino , S., Schleicher , D. R. G., et al. 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stu114 magenta , 439, 2386 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014MNRAS.439.2386G

  31. [39]

    Gurman , A., Hu , C.-Y., Sternberg , A., & van Dishoeck , E. F. 2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad2eac magenta , 965, 179 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...965..179G

  32. [40]

    Habing , H. J. 1968, , 19, 421 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1968BAN....19..421H

  33. [42]

    J., Allen , L

    Heiderman , A., Evans , II, N. J., Allen , L. E., Huard , T., & Heyer , M. 2010, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/723/2/1019 magenta , 723, 1019 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...723.1019H

  34. [43]

    E., Watson , D., Oesch , P

    Heintz , K. E., Watson , D., Oesch , P. A., Narayanan , D., & Madden , S. C. 2021, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac2231 magenta , 922, 147 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021ApJ...922..147H

  35. [44]

    2021, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039704 magenta , 649, A31 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...649A..31H

    Herrera-Camus , R., F \"o rster Schreiber , N., Genzel , R., et al. 2021, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202039704 magenta , 649, A31 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...649A..31H

  36. [45]

    2025, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250506340H http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.06340 magenta arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2505.06340

    Herrera-Camus , R., Gonz \'a lez-L \'o pez , J., F \"o rster Schreiber , N., et al. 2025, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250506340H http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2505.06340 magenta arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2505.06340

  37. [46]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2007.55 magenta Computing in Science & Engineering , 9, 90

  38. [47]

    R., Dayal , P., et al

    Hutter , A., Cueto , E. R., Dayal , P., et al. 2024, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv241000730H http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.00730 magenta arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2410.00730

  39. [48]

    2024, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240803374I http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.03374 magenta arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2408.03374

    Ikeda , R., Tadaki , K.-i., Mitsuhashi , I., et al. 2024, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240803374I http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.03374 magenta arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2408.03374

  40. [49]

    2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1779 magenta https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.tmp.1725I [ [arXiv] 2203.15136 ]

    Inami , H., Algera , H., Schouws , S., et al. 2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1779 magenta https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.tmp.1725I [ [arXiv] 2203.15136 ]

  41. [50]

    C., \"U bler , H., Perna , M., et al

    Jones , G. C., \"U bler , H., Perna , M., et al. 2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347838 magenta , 682, A122 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...682A.122J

  42. [51]

    C., et al

    Kaasinen , M., Venemans , B., Harrington , K. C., et al. 2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348463 magenta , 684, A33 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...684A..33K

  43. [52]

    Katz , H., Kimm , T., Sijacki , D., & Haehnelt , M. G. 2017, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx608 magenta , 468, 4831 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.468.4831K

  44. [53]

    2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac028 magenta , 510, 5603 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.510.5603K

    Katz , H., Rosdahl , J., Kimm , T., et al. 2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac028 magenta , 510, 5603 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.510.5603K

  45. [54]

    1998, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/305588 magenta , 498, 541 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...498..541K

    Kennicutt , Robert C., J. 1998, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/305588 magenta , 498, 541 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1998ApJ...498..541K

  46. [55]

    2021, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038944 magenta , 649, A152 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...649A.152K

    Khusanova , Y., Bethermin , M., Le F \`e vre , O., et al. 2021, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038944 magenta , 649, A152 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021A&A...649A.152K

  47. [56]

    K., Richard , J., Kneib , J.-P., et al

    Knudsen , K. K., Richard , J., Kneib , J.-P., et al. 2016, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnrasl/slw114 magenta , 462, L6 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2016MNRAS.462L...6K

  48. [57]

    2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2792 magenta , 499, 1250 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499.1250K

    Kohandel , M., Pallottini , A., Ferrara , A., et al. 2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa2792 magenta , 499, 1250 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.499.1250K

  49. [58]

    2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348209 magenta , 685, A72 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...685A..72K

    Kohandel , M., Pallottini , A., Ferrara , A., et al. 2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348209 magenta , 685, A72 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...685A..72K

  50. [59]

    T., Bigiel , F., et al

    Kova c i \'c , I., Barnes , A. T., Bigiel , F., et al. 2025, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202450062 magenta , 694, A87 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...694A..87K

  51. [60]

    2018, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201732019 magenta , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A

    Lagache , G., Cousin , M., & Chatzikos , M. 2018, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201732019 magenta , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018A

  52. [61]

    D., et al

    Leitherer , C., Schaerer , D., Goldader , J. D., et al. 1999, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/313233 magenta APJS , 123, 3 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJS..123....3L

  53. [62]

    K., Sun , J., Meidt , S., et al

    Leroy , A. K., Sun , J., Meidt , S., et al. 2025, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250204481L http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.04481 magenta arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2502.04481

  54. [63]

    C., et al

    Li , Z., Dekel , A., Sarkar , K. C., et al. 2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202348727 magenta , 690, A108 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...690A.108L

  55. [64]

    & Bovino , S

    Lupi , A. & Bovino , S. 2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa048 magenta , 492, 2818 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.492.2818L

  56. [65]

    2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1842 magenta https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.tmp.1963L [ [arXiv] 2004.06118 ]

    Lupi , A., Pallottini , A., Ferrara , A., et al. 2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/staa1842 magenta https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020MNRAS.tmp.1963L [ [arXiv] 2004.06118 ]

  57. [66]

    & Ferrara , A

    Mac Low , M.-M. & Ferrara , A. 1999, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/306832 magenta , 513, 142 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1999ApJ...513..142M

  58. [67]

    C., Cormier , D., Hony , S., et al

    Madden , S. C., Cormier , D., Hony , S., et al. 2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038860 magenta , 643, A141 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2020A&A...643A.141M

  59. [68]

    2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1194 magenta , 452, 54 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.452...54M

    Maiolino , R., Carniani , S., Fontana , A., et al. 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stv1194 magenta , 452, 54 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015MNRAS.452...54M

  60. [69]

    2025 a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250318850M http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.18850 magenta arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2503.18850

    Matteri , A., Ferrara , A., & Pallottini , A. 2025 a , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250318850M http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.18850 magenta arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2503.18850

  61. [70]

    2025 b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250301968M http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.01968 magenta arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2503.01968

    Matteri , A., Pallottini , A., & Ferrara , A. 2025 b , https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250301968M http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2503.01968 magenta arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2503.01968

  62. [71]

    A., et al

    Matthee , J., Sobral , D., Boogaard , L. A., et al. 2019, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab2f81 magenta , 881, 124 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019ApJ...881..124M

  63. [72]

    & Furlanetto , S

    Mirocha , J. & Furlanetto , S. R. 2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac3578 magenta , 519, 843 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.519..843M

  64. [73]

    A., Bakx , T

    Mitsuhashi , I., Zavala , J. A., Bakx , T. J. L. C., et al. 2025, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250119384M http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2501.19384 magenta arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2501.19384

  65. [74]

    P., Oesch , P

    Naidu , R. P., Oesch , P. A., van Dokkum , P., et al. 2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/ac9b22 magenta , 940, L14 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...940L..14N

  66. [75]

    C., & Hernquist , L

    Narayanan , D., Krumholz , M., Ostriker , E. C., & Hernquist , L. 2011, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19516.x magenta , 418, 664 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2011MNRAS.418..664N

  67. [76]

    E., & Prelogovi \'c , D

    Nikoli \'c , I., Mesinger , A., Davies , J. E., & Prelogovi \'c , D. 2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451213 magenta , 692, A142 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...692A.142N

  68. [77]

    R., Narayanan , D., et al

    Olsen , K., Greve , T. R., Narayanan , D., et al. 2017, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa86b4 magenta , 846, 105 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017ApJ...846..105O

  69. [78]

    & Loeb , A

    Padmanabhan , H. & Loeb , A. 2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acea7a magenta , 953, L4 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...953L...4P

  70. [79]

    & Ferrara , A

    Pallottini , A. & Ferrara , A. 2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347384 magenta , 677, L4 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...677L...4P

  71. [80]

    2017 a , http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1792 magenta , 471, 4128 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.471.4128P

    Pallottini , A., Ferrara , A., Bovino , S., et al. 2017 a , http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx1792 magenta , 471, 4128 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.471.4128P

  72. [81]

    2019, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1383 magenta , 487, 1689 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.487.1689P

    Pallottini , A., Ferrara , A., Decataldo , D., et al. 2019, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stz1383 magenta , 487, 1689 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2019MNRAS.487.1689P

  73. [82]

    2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1281 magenta , 513, 5621 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.513.5621P

    Pallottini , A., Ferrara , A., Gallerani , S., et al. 2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1281 magenta , 513, 5621 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.513.5621P

  74. [83]

    2024, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240800061P http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.00061 magenta arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2408.00061

    Pallottini , A., Ferrara , A., Gallerani , S., et al. 2024, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240800061P http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2408.00061 magenta arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2408.00061

  75. [84]

    2017 b , http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2847 magenta , 465, 2540 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465.2540P

    Pallottini , A., Ferrara , A., Gallerani , S., et al. 2017 b , http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stw2847 magenta , 465, 2540 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2017MNRAS.465.2540P

  76. [85]

    L., Langer , W

    Pineda , J. L., Langer , W. D., & Goldsmith , P. F. 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201424054 magenta , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A

  77. [86]

    C., Aravena , M., Gonz \'a lez-L \'o pez , J., et al

    Posses , A. C., Aravena , M., Gonz \'a lez-L \'o pez , J., et al. 2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243399 magenta , 669, A46 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...669A..46P

  78. [87]

    C., et al

    Ramambason , L., Lebouteiller , V., Madden , S. C., et al. 2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347280 magenta , 681, A14 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...681A..14R

  79. [88]

    C., Galliano , F., et al

    R \'e my-Ruyer , A., Madden , S. C., Galliano , F., et al. 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201322803 magenta , 563, A31 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2014A&A...563A..31R

  80. [89]

    2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243582 magenta , 667, A5 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...667A...5R

    Rizzo , F., Kohandel , M., Pallottini , A., et al. 2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202243582 magenta , 667, A5 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022A&A...667A...5R

  81. [90]

    2021, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2102.05671 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021arXiv210205671R

    Rizzo , F., Vegetti , S., Fraternali , F., Stacey , H., & Powell , D. 2021, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2102.05671 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021arXiv210205671R

  82. [91]

    2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1722 magenta , 436, 2188 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.436.2188R

    Rosdahl , J., Blaizot , J., Aubert , D., Stranex , T., & Teyssier , R. 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stt1722 magenta , 436, 2188 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013MNRAS.436.2188R

  83. [92]

    2025, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202453226 magenta , 695, A23 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...695A..23S

    Salvestrini , F., Feruglio , C., Tripodi , R., et al. 2025, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202453226 magenta , 695, A23 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...695A..23S

  84. [93]

    M., Leroy , A

    Sandstrom , K. M., Leroy , A. K., Walter , F., et al. 2013, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/777/1/5 magenta , 777, 5 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2013ApJ...777....5S

  85. [94]

    2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346945 magenta , 682, A98 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...682A..98S

    Schimek , A., Decataldo , D., Shen , S., et al. 2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346945 magenta , 682, A98 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...682A..98S

  86. [95]

    1959, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/146614 magenta , 129, 243 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1959ApJ...129..243S

    Schmidt , M. 1959, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/146614 magenta , 129, 243 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1959ApJ...129..243S

  87. [96]

    J., Algera , H., et al

    Schouws , S., Bouwens , R. J., Algera , H., et al. 2025, https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025arXiv250201610S http://dx.doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.01610 magenta arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2502.01610

  88. [97]

    2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202449192 magenta , 689, A145 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...689A.145S

    Solimano , M., Gonz \'a lez-L \'o pez , J., Aravena , M., et al. 2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202449192 magenta , 689, A145 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...689A.145S

  89. [98]

    2021, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab720 magenta , 503, 4878 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.503.4878S

    Sommovigo , L., Ferrara , A., Carniani , S., et al. 2021, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stab720 magenta , 503, 4878 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2021MNRAS.503.4878S

  90. [99]

    C., et al

    Sun , G., Faucher-Gigu \`e re , C.-A., Hayward , C. C., et al. 2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/acf85a magenta , 955, L35 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023ApJ...955L..35S

  91. [100]

    D., Robertson , B

    Tacchella , S., Johnson , B. D., Robertson , B. E., et al. 2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad1408 magenta , 522, 6236 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023MNRAS.522.6236T

  92. [101]

    2002, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20011817 magenta , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002A

    Teyssier , R. 2002, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361:20011817 magenta , http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2002A

  93. [102]

    2024, pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas

    The pandas development Team . 2024, pandas-dev/pandas: Pandas

  94. [103]

    Tielens , A. G. G. M. 2005, The Physics and Chemistry of the Interstellar Medium

  95. [104]

    W., Stark , D

    Topping , M. W., Stark , D. P., Endsley , R., et al. 2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac2291 magenta , 516, 975 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.516..975T

  96. [105]

    2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae651 magenta , 529, 3563 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.529.3563T

    Trinca , A., Schneider , R., Valiante , R., et al. 2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae651 magenta , 529, 3563 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.529.3563T

  97. [106]

    2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202449980 magenta , 692, A184 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...692A.184T

    Tripodi , R., D'Eugenio , F., Maiolino , R., et al. 2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202449980 magenta , 692, A184 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...692A.184T

  98. [107]

    2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346137 magenta , 677, A145 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...677A.145U

    \"U bler , H., Maiolino , R., Curtis-Lake , E., et al. 2023, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346137 magenta , 677, A145 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2023A&A...677A.145U

  99. [108]

    2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/813/1/36 magenta , 813, 36 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...813...36V

    Vallini , L., Gallerani , S., Ferrara , A., Pallottini , A., & Yue , B. 2015, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/813/1/36 magenta , 813, 36 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015ApJ...813...36V

  100. [109]

    2018, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2376 magenta , 473, 271 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473..271V

    Vallini , L., Pallottini , A., Ferrara , A., et al. 2018, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stx2376 magenta , 473, 271 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.473..271V

  101. [110]

    2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad3150 magenta , 527, 10 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527...10V

    Vallini , L., Witstok , J., Sommovigo , L., et al. 2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stad3150 magenta , 527, 10 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024MNRAS.527...10V

  102. [111]

    2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202449855 magenta , 691, A19 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...691A..19V

    Venturi , G., Carniani , S., Parlanti , E., et al. 2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202449855 magenta , 691, A19 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024A&A...691A..19V

  103. [112]

    2025, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451111 magenta , 693, A34 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...693A..34V

    Veraldi , E., Vallini , L., Pozzi , F., et al. 2025, http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202451111 magenta , 693, A34 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025A&A...693A..34V

  104. [113]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2 magenta Nature Methods , 17, 261 https://rdcu.be/b08Wh

  105. [114]

    R., Olsen , K

    Vizgan , D., Greve , T. R., Olsen , K. P., et al. 2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac5cba magenta , 929, 92 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ApJ...929...92V

  106. [115]

    Waskom, M. L. 2021, http://dx.doi.org/10.21105/joss.03021 magenta Journal of Open Source Software , 6, 3021

  107. [116]

    Weingartner , J. C. & Draine , B. T. 2001, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/318651 magenta , 548, 296 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2001ApJ...548..296W

  108. [117]

    2025, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae2535 magenta , 536, 27 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.536...27W

    Witstok , J., Maiolino , R., Smit , R., et al. 2025, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae2535 magenta , 536, 27 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2025MNRAS.536...27W

  109. [118]

    2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1905 magenta , 515, 1751 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.515.1751W

    Witstok , J., Smit , R., Maiolino , R., et al. 2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stac1905 magenta , 515, 1751 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022MNRAS.515.1751W

  110. [119]

    G., Hollenbach , D., & McKee , C

    Wolfire , M. G., Hollenbach , D., & McKee , C. F. 2010, http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/716/2/1191 magenta , 716, 1191 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2010ApJ...716.1191W

  111. [120]

    G., McKee , C

    Wolfire , M. G., McKee , C. F., Hollenbach , D., & Tielens , A. G. G. M. 2003, http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/368016 magenta , 587, 278 http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003ApJ...587..278W

  112. [121]

    G., Vallini , L., & Chevance , M

    Wolfire , M. G., Vallini , L., & Chevance , M. 2022, http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-052920-010254 magenta , 60, 247 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2022ARA&A..60..247W

  113. [122]

    2018, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2394 magenta , 481, 1976 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481.1976Z

    Zanella , A., Daddi , E., Magdis , G., et al. 2018, http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/mnras/sty2394 magenta , 481, 1976 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2018MNRAS.481.1976Z

  114. [123]

    Zhao , Y., Liu , J., Zhang , Z.-Y., & Bisbas , T. G. 2024, http://dx.doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad8c3e magenta , 977, 46 https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024ApJ...977...46Z

Pith tools

Reviewed August 16, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.