Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 69 references

Minor-merger induced star formation rejuvenation in an elliptical radio-loud quasar host, 3C 59

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The host galaxy of radio-loud quasar 3C 59 has restarted star formation within the last 500 million years, a rejuvenation the paper attributes to ongoing minor mergers with nearby satellites.

desk verdict A carefully made case study whose merger narrative rests on unconfirmed satellite membership; the rejuvenation evidence is plausible but not yet secure. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.11367 v1 pith:W5AV4K65 submitted 2024-12-16 astro-ph.GA

Yijun Wang (1) , Tao Wang (1) , Ke Xu (1) , Junjie Mao (2) , Yerong Xu (3 , 4) , Zheng Zhou (5) ((1) Nanjing University , (2) Tsinghua University
show 3 more authors
(3) Saint Mary's University (4) INAF (5) Xiamen University)
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords galaxymergersstarformationrejuvenationradio-loudquasarsellipticalgalaxiessatellitegroupsquenching3C59
topics Dark Matter
open problems Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports that 3C 59, a massive elliptical galaxy hosting a radio-loud quasar, has restarted star formation after a long quiescent period, with the burst occurring within the past 500 million years. The authors argue that ongoing minor mergers with five satellite galaxies within a projected distance of 200 kpc are the cause: the three nearest satellites show morphological disturbances, two show tidal tails pointing toward 3C 59, and the host's effective radius is much larger than expected for its stellar mass, consistent with merger-driven size growth. All five satellites are quiescent disk galaxies, which the paper interprets as a sign that the massive dark matter halo and the powerful radio jet heat the surrounding gas and suppress star formation in the satellites. If correct, this is one of the few direct observations connecting minor mergers to star formation rejuvenation, with implications for how massive early-type galaxies grow in mass and size.

What carries the argument

The key machinery is the reconstructed star formation history of 3C 59, obtained by fitting a non-parametric model to the multi-wavelength photometry and an optical spectrum, with the AGN continuum modeled and subtracted separately so that the host light is isolated. Supporting this are two-dimensional image decompositions that separate the AGN point source from the host and measure effective radii and Sersic indices, and the classification of galaxies by their position relative to the star-forming main sequence and in the rest-frame UVJ color diagram. The merger evidence comes from projected separations, tidal-tail morphologies, and the gradient of morphological disturbance with distance from 3C 59.

What would settle it

Take deep optical spectra of the three nearest satellites and measure their redshifts; if any differ from 3C 59's redshift ($z = 0.1096$) by more than a few hundred km/s, that galaxy is not a bound companion and the minor-merger interpretation loses its closest evidence. X-ray maps of the group would also test the jet-heating feedback picture.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that 3C 59's host galaxy was largely quiescent for most of cosmic time, then experienced a significant star formation rejuvenation within the last 500 Myr, placing it above the star-forming main sequence and in the star-forming region of the UVJ diagram. The authors connect this rejuvenation to ongoing minor mergers: the three nearest satellite galaxies show significant morphological disturbances, two of them show strong tidal tails pointing toward 3C 59, and the host's effective radius exceeds the local early-type and late-type scaling relations, indicating dramatic recent size growth. The five satellites within 200 kpc all have low star formation rates and lie in the quiescent region of the UVJ diagram; the paper proposes that the massive dark matter halo and the large-scale radio jet keep the halo hot, preventing gas cooling and further reducing star formation in the satellites. The paper also suggests that the minor mergers may play a role in triggering the quasar activity itself.

Load-bearing premise

The argument depends on the five nearby galaxies actually being bound companions of 3C 59; their distances are estimated from colors and brightness with uncertainties large enough that they could instead be foreground or background objects seen in projection.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Minor mergers are a plausible direct trigger for star formation rejuvenation in massive elliptical galaxies, giving a single-system counterpart to simulations that predict this channel.
  • The oversized effective radius of 3C 59 supports the view that minor mergers drive the size growth of massive early-type galaxies.
  • The all-quiescent satellite population is consistent with massive halos and radio-jet heating quenching star formation in group satellites, even when the satellites are late-type disks.
  • Quasar activity and star formation rejuvenation can coexist in one host, and both may be fed by the same merger-fed gas supply.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable implication the paper does not pursue is to obtain spectroscopy of Satellites A, B, and C; confirming their redshifts match 3C 59 within a few hundred km/s would harden the merger interpretation, while a mismatch would leave the rejuvenation without its proposed trigger.
  • The paper does not estimate whether the satellites can actually supply the gas needed; comparing the stellar masses of the satellites with the gas required to sustain a burst of about 6 solar masses per year for 500 Myr would test the accretion scenario.
  • If this mechanism operates generally, analogous systems should be discoverable by combining imaging surveys with non-parametric star formation histories; counting how often star-forming ellipticals with tidal tails appear in groups would measure the duty cycle of merger-driven rejuvenation.
  • The radio-jet heating conjecture could be tested by X-ray observations of the region around 3C 59: a hot, extended intragroup medium would support the feedback story, and its absence would not.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents a multi-wavelength case study of the radio-loud quasar 3C 59 (z=0.1096), reporting that its elliptical host galaxy has undergone significant star formation rejuvenation within the past 500 Myr, inferred from a non-parametric Prospector SFH fit after subtracting a fixed CIGALE AGN model. The authors identify five photometric satellite galaxies within a projected 200 kpc radius, find morphological disturbances and tidal tails in the three nearest, and argue that ongoing minor mergers with these satellites are feeding cold gas into 3C 59, triggering the rejuvenation and possibly the quasar activity. They further propose that the massive halo and the radio jet keep the satellite galaxies quenched. The paper is a carefully assembled case study, but the causal interpretation rests on two premises that are not yet secured: the physical association of the five satellites, and the reliability of the AGN-subtracted SFH reconstruction.

Significance. If the merger interpretation holds, this is a rare and potentially important direct case linking minor mergers to star formation rejuvenation in a massive elliptical radio-loud quasar host, with implications for size growth and satellite quenching. The paper deserves credit for assembling a broad multi-wavelength dataset, combining CIGALE and Prospector fits, performing careful image decomposition, and presenting the UVJ/main-sequence classification. The SFH reconstruction is falsifiable in principle, and the morphological evidence is informative. However, the headline claim that minor mergers caused the rejuvenation is not yet demonstrated: it depends on the satellites actually being satellites, which the current photometric-redshift evidence does not establish, and on the AGN subtraction not biasing the inferred recent SFR. As a 'candidate minor-merger rejuvenation' case, the paper is interesting and publishable after revision; as a demonstration, it is not conclusive.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2 and Section 5.2] The satellite selection in Section 2 uses |z_phot - z_spec| <= delta_z_phot with delta_z_phot = 0.018-0.041, corresponding at z=0.1096 to line-of-sight velocity windows of roughly 5000-11000 km/s, orders of magnitude larger than a group-scale velocity dispersion. Chance projection is therefore not excluded. The subsequent decision in Section 5.2 to fix the SED-fitting redshift of Satellites A, B, and C to z=0.1096 because it gives a lower reduced chi^2 is a post-hoc choice that cannot independently certify membership; the same is true for using 3C 59's own photometric redshift (0.1424 +/- 0.0161), which is about 2 sigma from its spectroscopic redshift and further broadens the window. If any of A-C are foreground or background objects, the 'tidal tails' and the minor-merger interpretation in Section 6.1 lose their physical basis. I ask the authors to estimate the expected number of interlopers in the selection volume, to search for or obtain spectroscopic redshifts for the five galaxies, and to reframe the conclusion as a candidate merger unless membership is secured.
  2. [Section 6.1 and Appendix F] The Prospector SFH fit is performed on data from which a single best-fit CIGALE AGN continuum model has been subtracted, with the AGN parameters fixed from a separate fit (Section 5.1, Table D2). The uncertainty in that AGN model, including the AGN fraction F_AGN = 0.80 +/- 0.11 and the polar-dust parameters, is not propagated into the SFH posteriors. An over- or under-subtracted AGN continuum in the LAMOST spectrum or the broadband SED could either create or suppress apparent recent star formation, directly affecting the central claim of rejuvenation within the past 500 Myr. Please test the robustness of the SFH by repeating the Prospector fit with AGN models drawn from the CIGALE posterior or with extreme allowable AGN parameters, and report how the recent SFR changes.
  3. [Figure 5 and Section 6.1] The claim of 'significant star formation rejuvenation within the past 500 Myr' is based on the visual shape of the median SFH in Figure 5, but no quantitative measure is reported for whether the posterior SFR in the last 500 Myr is actually higher than at earlier times, and no comparison is made against a smoothly declining or no-rejuvenation SFH. Given that the 1-sigma uncertainty region in Figure 5 appears broad, the authors should report the posterior probability of recent enhancement, the posterior SFR in the relevant time bins, and ideally a model comparison against a SFH without a recent upturn.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table C1 and Figure 4] The text states that the reduced chi^2 of the image decomposition decreases from Satellite A to E, but the g-band values are A=1.22, B=0.98, C=0.90, D=0.83, E=0.85, so E does not continue the trend; also, reduced chi^2 alone is not a calibrated disturbance metric, and the authors should clarify how the residual maps are used to infer morphological disturbance.
  2. [Appendix E] In the first sentence of Appendix E, '3C 39' should read '3C 59'.
  3. [Section 6.2] The two halo mass estimates differ by a factor of about 15 (M_h,star = 9.48e11 M_sun versus M_h,BH = 1.44e13 M_sun), and the statement that the halo mass is 'almost higher than 10^12 M_sun' is only marginally true for the stellar-mass-based estimate; the authors should explicitly discuss this discrepancy and the large systematic uncertainty in the MBH-Mh relation before using it to support the satellite quenching interpretation.
  4. [Section 6.1] The identification of tidal tails and morphological disturbances is made by eye from the residual images; a quantitative asymmetry or perturbation metric would substantially strengthen the claim that the three nearest satellites are interacting with 3C 59.
  5. [General] The paper does not include a data availability statement; for reproducibility, the authors should provide the best-fit Prospector and CIGALE posterior products, or at least the final model SEDs and SFH chains.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the star-formation-history fit is data-driven and the satellite-merger interpretation is an inference from independent photometric and morphological evidence.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is self-contained and not circular. 3C 59's star-formation history is obtained by fitting the observed multi-band photometry and the LAMOST spectrum with Prospector (Section 6.1 and Appendix F); the rejuvenation within the past 500 Myr is a data-driven result, not an output of any fitted parameter that is then renamed as a prediction. The satellite galaxies are selected by fixed projected-distance and photo-z criteria (Section 2); although the photo-z windows are broad and Satellites A-C are subsequently assigned z=0.1096 in the SED fitting because that yields lower reduced chi-square (Section 5.2), this is a modeling choice for deriving stellar masses and SFRs, not a fitted parameter that is then used to certify membership or to predict the rejuvenation. The morphological disturbances, tidal tails, and low SFRs are direct observational or independently derived properties, and the minor-merger interpretation is an inference drawn from them, not an equation that reduces to its input. The only self-citation (Wang et al. 2023) supports a generic statement about minor mergers triggering AGN activity and is not load-bearing. No step in the paper's derivation becomes equivalent to its input by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on standard SED fitting assumptions and on the physical association of five galaxies selected via broad photometric redshift windows. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (3)
  • Fixed redshift for Satellites A/B/C = 0.1096 (3C 59's spectroscopic redshift)
    Chosen over SDSS photometric redshifts because it gives lower reduced chi2 in the SED fit; affects the derived stellar masses and SFRs of the satellites used in the quenching interpretation.
  • AGN model parameters fixed from first-stage CIGALE fit = frac_AGN=0.8, theta=30 deg, E(B-V)_PD=0.8, alpha_AGN=0.48
    These parameters are fitted to AGN-dominated data and then fixed when fitting the host galaxy and when subtracting the AGN continuum for the Prospector SFH reconstruction; their uncertainties are not propagated.
  • Sersic index of 3C 59 host = 4.0 (fixed)
    Fixed to a de Vaucouleurs profile during galight decomposition; this choice affects the recovered host galaxy flux and effective radius, though the paper reports that n=4 fits better than n=1.
assumptions (6)
  • standard math Flat LCDM cosmology with Omega_m=0.3, Omega_Lambda=0.7, and H0=70 km/s/Mpc
    Invoked for distance and projected separation calculations throughout the paper.
  • domain assumption Chabrier IMF and Bruzual and Charlot (2003) simple stellar population models accurately represent the stellar populations of 3C 59 and its satellites
    Used in the CIGALE SED fitting to derive stellar masses, SFRs, and rest-frame colors.
  • domain assumption The Stalevski et al. AGN model plus the CIGALE implementation correctly describes the AGN SED of 3C 59
    The AGN model is fitted to mid-IR and radio data, then fixed and used to subtract the AGN continuum from the optical spectrum before the Prospector SFH fit.
  • domain assumption The Popesso et al. (2023) main sequence and the Schreiber et al. (2015) UVJ criteria correctly classify star-forming versus quiescent galaxies at z~0.11
    Used to classify 3C 59 as an SFG and all five satellites as QGs.
  • domain assumption The Mstar-Mh and MBH-Mh relations from Girelli et al. (2020) and Ferrarese (2002) are valid for 3C 59
    Used to estimate the dark matter halo mass, which underpins the halo quenching explanation for the satellites.
  • domain assumption Photometric redshift errors are approximately Gaussian and the criterion |z_phot - z_spec| <= delta_z_phot ensures physical association
    This is the basis for selecting the five satellite candidates; the large uncertainties make this assumption strained.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Minor-merger induced star formation rejuvenation in an elliptical radio-loud quasar host, 3C 59." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/W5AV4K65

@misc{pith2026241211367,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Minor-merger induced star formation rejuvenation in an elliptical radio-loud quasar host, 3C 59},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/W5AV4K65}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.11367}
}
abstract

We report a rare case where an elliptical radio-loud quasar host, 3C 59, rejuvenates star formation activity through minor mergers with its nearby satellite galaxies. The inferred star formation history of 3C 59 shows significant star formation rejuvenation within the past 500 Myr, before which remains rather quiescent for most of the cosmic time. Three nearest satellite galaxies of 3C 59 exhibit significant morphological disturbances, and two of them present strong tidal tails pointing towards 3C 59. In addition, all the satellite galaxies within a projected distance of 200 kpc show low star formation activities. They also have systematically lower effective radius ($R_{\rm e}$) than local late-type galaxies, while 3C 59 has significantly larger $R_{\rm e}$ than both early- and late-type galaxies. All these features suggest that ongoing minor mergers between 3C 59 and its nearby satellites could be causing gas to flow into 3C 59, which induces the star formation rejuvenation, and possibly also triggers the quasar activity. The enormous power from the large-scale radio jet of 3C 59 may in turn help keep the halo hot, prevent gas cooling, and further reduce star formation in its satellite galaxies. These results provide important insights into the mass and size growth of central galaxies and star formation quenching of satellite galaxies in galaxy groups.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.11367 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Images for 3C 59 (the black cross) and its five satellite galaxies (A, B, C, D, and E; the green circles). The background shows an RGB image of DESI g, r, and z filters. The red contour represents the VLASS 3 GHz data, and the contour levels are 5σ, 8σ, 12σ, 30σ, and 70σ (σ ∼ 0.18 mJy beam−1 ). The white arrow represents the distance from 3C 59 to the edge of the radio lobe (∼ 150 kpc at z = 0.1096). The yellow arro… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. 2D decomposition of 3C 59 and the five satellite galaxies for the DESI g-band images with galight. The first row is shown for 3C 59, while the panels from left to right represent data, model, data minus point source (host galaxy only), normalized residual (data−model/noise), and surface brightness profile, respectively. The second row to the sixth row are shown for Satellites A, B, C, D, and E, respectively, while i… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Best-fit broadband SED model with cigale for 3C 59 (Panel a) and the five satellite galaxies (Panels b–f). The details about the observational data used for SED fitting are introduced in Section 3, and shown in Tables A1 and A2. The details about DESI AGN fluxes are introduced in Section 4 and shown in Table C1. Therefore, the redshift value applied in the SED fitting is 0.1096 for Satellite A/B/C, 0.1382 for Satell… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Structure properties and star formation properties of 3C 59 and the five satellite galaxies (A, B, C, D, and E). Panel (a): Projected distance of each satellite galaxy to 3C 59. The radius of each circle is equal to 2Re,g where Re,g is the DESI g-filter effective radiu…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: The star formation history of 3C 59. The red curve shows the best-fit star formation history of 3C 59 with prospector, while the red region shows the 1-σ uncertainty. The small grey panel shows the star formation history after zooming in recent 2 Gyr. The dashed blue l…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

69 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2019, The IRAS Sky Survey Atlas, IPAC, doi: 10.26131/IRSA10

    work page doi:10.26131/irsa10 2019

  2. [2]

    2020, ApJS, 249, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab929e 18 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T

    Ahumada, R., Allende Prieto, C., Almeida, A., et al. 2020, ApJS, 249, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab929e 18 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    doi:10.3847/1538-4365/ab929e 2020

  3. [3]

    S., & Csabai, I

    Beck, R., Dobos, L., Budav´ ari, T., Szalay, A. S., & Csabai, I. 2016, MNRAS, 460, 1371, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw1009 B´ edorf, J., & Portegies Zwart, S. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 767, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt208

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stw1009 2016

  4. [4]

    2011, Ap&SS, 335, 161, doi: 10.1007/s10509-010-0581-x

    Bianchi, L., Herald, J., Efremova, B., et al. 2011, Ap&SS, 335, 161, doi: 10.1007/s10509-010-0581-x

    doi:10.1007/s10509-010-0581-x 2011

  5. [6]

    2019, A&A, 622, A103, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834156

    Boquien, M., Burgarella, D., Roehlly, Y., et al. 2019, A&A, 622, A103, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834156

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201834156 2019

  6. [7]

    2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x

    Bruzual, G., & Charlot, S. 2003, MNRAS, 344, 1000, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06897.x

    arXiv 2003

  7. [8]

    2005, MNRAS, 360, 1413, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09131.x

    Burgarella, D., Buat, V., & Iglesias-P´ aramo, J. 2005, MNRAS, 360, 1413, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09131.x

    arXiv 2005

  8. [9]

    C., et al

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682, doi: 10.1086/308692

    doi:10.1086/308692 2000

Show all 69 references
  1. [10]

    2018, A&A, 620, A192, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833935

    Ceraj, L., Smolˇ ci´ c, V., Delvecchio, I., et al. 2018, A&A, 620, A192, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833935

    2018 doi

  2. [11]

    2003, ApJL, 586, L133, doi: 10.1086/374879

    Chabrier, G. 2003, ApJL, 586, L133, doi: 10.1086/374879

    2003 doi

  3. [12]

    2019, ApJ, 877, 48, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab164d

    Chauke, P., van der Wel, A., Pacifici, C., et al. 2019, ApJ, 877, 48, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab164d

    2019 doi

  4. [13]

    M., Skrutskie, M

    Cutri, R. M., Skrutskie, M. F., van Dyk, S., et al. 2003, VizieR Online Data Catalog, II/246

    2003

  5. [14]

    M., Wright, E

    Cutri, R. M., Wright, E. L., Conrow, T., et al. 2021, VizieR Online Data Catalog, II/328

    2021

  6. [15]

    A., Helou, G., Magdis, G

    Dale, D. A., Helou, G., Magdis, G. E., et al. 2014, ApJ, 784, 83, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/784/1/83

    2014 doi

  7. [16]

    2006, MNRAS, 368, 2, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10145.x

    Dekel, A., & Birnboim, Y. 2006, MNRAS, 368, 2, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10145.x

    2006

  8. [17]

    J., Lang, D., et al

    Dey, A., Schlegel, D. J., Lang, D., et al. 2019, AJ, 157, 168, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/ab089d

    2019 doi

  9. [18]

    A., et al

    Diaz, J., Bekki, K., Forbes, D. A., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 477, 2030, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty743

    2018 doi

  10. [19]

    Ding, X., Birrer, S., Treu, T., & Silverman, J. D. 2021, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2111.08721, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2111.08721

    2021 doi arXiv

  11. [20]

    Eracleous, M., & Halpern, J. P. 1994, ApJS, 90, 1, doi: 10.1086/191856 —. 2004, ApJS, 150, 181, doi: 10.1086/379823

    1994 doi

  12. [21]

    M., Willmer, C

    Faber, S. M., Willmer, C. N. A., Wolf, C., et al. 2007, ApJ, 665, 265, doi: 10.1086/519294

    2007 doi

  13. [22]

    2002, ApJ, 578, 90, doi: 10.1086/342308

    Ferrarese, L. 2002, ApJ, 578, 90, doi: 10.1086/342308

    2002 doi

  14. [23]

    Fitzpatrick, E. L. 1999, PASP, 111, 63, doi: 10.1086/316293

    1999 doi

  15. [24]

    2020, A&A, 634, A135, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936329

    Girelli, G., Pozzetti, L., Bolzonella, M., et al. 2020, A&A, 634, A135, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201936329

    2020 doi

  16. [25]

    A., Boyce, M

    Gordon, Y. A., Boyce, M. M., O’Dea, C. P., et al. 2021, ApJS, 255, 30, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac05c0

    2021 doi

  17. [26]

    2019, ApJL, 883, L36, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab42e5

    Hao, C.-N., Shi, Y., Chen, Y., et al. 2019, ApJL, 883, L36, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab42e5

    2019 doi

  18. [27]

    2023, ApJS, 265, 25, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acaf89

    Jin, J.-J., Wu, X.-B., Fu, Y., et al. 2023, ApJS, 265, 25, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acaf89

    2023 doi

  19. [28]

    D., Leja, J., Conroy, C., & Speagle, J

    Johnson, B. D., Leja, J., Conroy, C., & Speagle, J. S. 2021, ApJS, 254, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abef67

    2021 doi

  20. [29]

    2009, MNRAS, 394, 1713, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14403.x

    Kaviraj, S., Peirani, S., Khochfar, S., Silk, J., & Kay, S. 2009, MNRAS, 394, 1713, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.14403.x

    2009

  21. [30]

    2014, MNRAS, 443, 1861, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1220

    Kaviraj, S., Huertas-Company, M., Cohen, S., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 1861, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1220

    2014 doi

  22. [31]

    2013, ApJL, 775, L16, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/775/1/L16

    Kriek, M., & Conroy, C. 2013, ApJL, 775, L16, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/775/1/L16

    2013 doi

  23. [32]

    2001, MNRAS, 322, 231, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x

    Kroupa, P. 2001, MNRAS, 322, 231, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2001.04022.x

    2001

  24. [33]

    A., Chandler, C

    Lacy, M., Baum, S. A., Chandler, C. J., et al. 2020, PASP, 132, 035001, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab63eb

    2020 doi

  25. [34]

    P., Robotham, A

    Lange, R., Driver, S. P., Robotham, A. S. G., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 447, 2603, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2467

    2015 doi

  26. [35]

    2017, ApJ, 837, 170, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5ffe L´ opez-Sanjuan, C., Le F` evre, O., Ilbert, O., et al

    Byler, N. 2017, ApJ, 837, 170, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa5ffe L´ opez-Sanjuan, C., Le F` evre, O., Ilbert, O., et al. 2012, A&A, 548, A7, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201219085

    2017 doi

  27. [36]

    2019, MNRAS, 489, 1265, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2130

    Mancini, C., Daddi, E., Juneau, S., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 489, 1265, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2130

    2019 doi

  28. [37]

    M., Marchesini, E., et al

    Mao, P., Urry, C. M., Marchesini, E., et al. 2017, ApJ, 842, 87, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa74b8

    2017 doi

  29. [38]

    B., et al

    Matharu, J., Muzzin, A., Brammer, G. B., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 595, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3465 Mej ´ ıa-Restrepo, J. E., Trakhtenbrot, B., Koss, M. J., et al. 2022, ApJS, 261, 5, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac6602

    2019 doi

  30. [39]

    A., et al

    Morrissey, P., Conrow, T., Barlow, T. A., et al. 2007, ApJS, 173, 682, doi: 10.1086/520512

    2007 doi

  31. [40]

    L., Aird, J., et al

    Moustakas, J., Coil, A. L., Aird, J., et al. 2013, ApJ, 767, 50, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/767/1/50

    2013 doi

  32. [41]

    H., & Ostriker, J

    Naab, T., Johansson, P. H., & Ostriker, J. P. 2009, ApJL, 699, L178, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/699/2/L178

    2009 doi

  33. [42]

    G., Weiner, B

    Noeske, K. G., Weiner, B. J., Faber, S. M., et al. 2007, ApJL, 660, L43, doi: 10.1086/517926

    2007 doi

  34. [43]

    2009, A&A, 507, 1793, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912497

    Noll, S., Burgarella, D., Giovannoli, E., et al. 2009, A&A, 507, 1793, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912497

    2009 doi

  35. [44]

    2016, MNRAS, 456, 300, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2581

    Oogi, T., Habe, A., & Ishiyama, T. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 300, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2581

    2016 doi

  36. [45]

    2024, MNRAS, 531, 2223, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1296 19

    Pandey, D., Kaviraj, S., Saha, K., & Sharma, S. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 2223, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1296 19

    2024 doi

  37. [46]

    2023, ApJL, 951, L36, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acdef1

    Paudel, S., Yoon, S.-J., Bait, O., et al. 2023, ApJL, 951, L36, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acdef1

    2023 doi

  38. [47]

    J., Kovaˇ c, K., et al

    Peng, Y.-j., Lilly, S. J., Kovaˇ c, K., et al. 2010, ApJ, 721, 193, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/721/1/193

    2010 doi

  39. [48]

    2021, AJ, 161, 14, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abc4e1

    Petrov, L. 2021, AJ, 161, 14, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abc4e1

    2021 doi

  40. [49]

    2023, MNRAS, 519, 1526, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3214

    Popesso, P., Concas, A., Cresci, G., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 1526, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3214

    2023 doi

  41. [50]

    2022, MNRAS, 513, 389, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac871

    Bait, O. 2022, MNRAS, 513, 389, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac871

    2022 doi

  42. [51]

    2015, ApJL, 801, L29, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/801/2/L29

    Renzini, A., & Peng, Y.-j. 2015, ApJL, 801, L29, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/801/2/L29

    2015 doi

  43. [52]

    Rothberg, B., Fischer, J., Rodrigues, M., & Sanders, D. B. 2013, ApJ, 767, 72, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/767/1/72

    2013 doi

  44. [53]

    2018, MNRAS, 473, 1168, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1903

    Rowlands, K., Wild, V., Bourne, N., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 473, 1168, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1903

    2018 doi

  45. [54]

    F., & Finkbeiner, D

    Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103

    2011 doi

  46. [55]

    J., Finkbeiner, D

    Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525, doi: 10.1086/305772

    1998 doi

  47. [56]

    2015, A&A, 575, A74, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425017

    Schreiber, C., Pannella, M., Elbaz, D., et al. 2015, A&A, 575, A74, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201425017

    2015 doi

  48. [58]

    R., Lemaux, B

    Shen, L., Tomczak, A. R., Lemaux, B. C., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 484, 2433, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz152

    2019 doi

  49. [59]

    Silverman, J. D. 2014, ApJS, 214, 15, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/214/2/15

    2014 doi

  50. [60]

    Stalevski, M., Fritz, J., Baes, M., Nakos, T., & Popovi´ c, L. ˇC. 2012, MNRAS, 420, 2756, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19775.x

    2012

  51. [61]

    2016, MNRAS, 458, 2288, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw444

    Stalevski, M., Ricci, C., Ueda, Y., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 2288, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw444

    2016 doi

  52. [62]

    M., et al

    Tacchella, S., Conroy, C., Faber, S. M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 926, 134, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac449b

    2022 doi

  53. [63]

    S., Shimasaku, K., Tacchella, S., et al

    Tanaka, T. S., Shimasaku, K., Tacchella, S., et al. 2024, PASJ, 76, 1, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psad076 van Bemmel, I. M., & Bertoldi, F. 2001, A&A, 368, 414, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20010040

    2024 doi

  54. [64]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2311.07653, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2311.07653

    Wang, T., Xu, K., Wu, Y., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2311.07653, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2311.07653

    2023 doi arXiv

  55. [65]

    2024, A&A, 685, A79, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347787

    Wang, Y., Wang, T., Liu, D., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A79, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347787

    2024 doi

  56. [66]

    E., van Dokkum, P

    Whitaker, K. E., van Dokkum, P. G., Brammer, G., et al. 2013, ApJL, 770, L39, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/770/2/L39

    2013 doi

  57. [67]

    M., & Koo, D

    Woo, J., Dekel, A., Faber, S. M., & Koo, D. C. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 237, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu2755

    2015 doi

  58. [68]

    L., Eisenhardt, P

    Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., et al. 2010, AJ, 140, 1868, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/140/6/1868

    2010 doi

  59. [69]

    Wu, X.-B., & Liu, F. K. 2004, ApJ, 614, 91, doi: 10.1086/423446

    2004 doi

  60. [70]

    2020, MNRAS, 491, 740, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3001

    Yang, G., Boquien, M., Buat, V., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 740, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3001

    2020 doi

  61. [71]

    N., et al

    Yang, G., Boquien, M., Brandt, W. N., et al. 2022, ApJ, 927, 192, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac4971

    2022 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.