Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 cited by

EmoLLMs: A Series of Emotional Large Language Models and Annotation Tools for Comprehensive Affective Analysis

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2401.08508 v2 pith:W5AZ2YAO submitted 2024-01-16 cs.CL

classification cs.CL
keywords affectivetasksllmsanalysiscomprehensiveinstructionvariousdownstream
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Sentiment analysis and emotion detection are important research topics in natural language processing (NLP) and benefit many downstream tasks. With the widespread application of LLMs, researchers have started exploring the application of LLMs based on instruction-tuning in the field of sentiment analysis. However, these models only focus on single aspects of affective classification tasks (e.g. sentimental polarity or categorical emotions), and overlook the regression tasks (e.g. sentiment strength or emotion intensity), which leads to poor performance in downstream tasks. The main reason is the lack of comprehensive affective instruction tuning datasets and evaluation benchmarks, which cover various affective classification and regression tasks. Moreover, although emotional information is useful for downstream tasks, existing downstream datasets lack high-quality and comprehensive affective annotations. In this paper, we propose EmoLLMs, the first series of open-sourced instruction-following LLMs for comprehensive affective analysis based on fine-tuning various LLMs with instruction data, the first multi-task affective analysis instruction dataset (AAID) with 234K data samples based on various classification and regression tasks to support LLM instruction tuning, and a comprehensive affective evaluation benchmark (AEB) with 14 tasks from various sources and domains to test the generalization ability of LLMs. We propose a series of EmoLLMs by fine-tuning LLMs with AAID to solve various affective instruction tasks. We compare our model with a variety of LLMs on AEB, where our models outperform all other open-sourced LLMs, and surpass ChatGPT and GPT-4 in most tasks, which shows that the series of EmoLLMs achieve the ChatGPT-level and GPT-4-level generalization capabilities on affective analysis tasks, and demonstrates our models can be used as affective annotation tools.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Evaluating Vision-Language Models for Emotion Recognition

    cs.CV 2025-02 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Vision-language models are weak and prompt-sensitive at evoked emotion recognition, and many fine-grained errors are best explained by noisy dataset labels.

  2. Toward Annotation-Efficient Continuous Emotion Arousal Quantification via Group-Level EEG Dynamic Neural Synchrony

    cs.HC 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Group-level EEG dynamic neural synchrony (CorrCA) preferentially tracks the rate of change of continuous arousal and shows valence-dependent structure across four datasets.

  3. Balancing Knowledge Delivery and Emotional Comfort in Healthcare Conversational Systems

    cs.CL 2025-06 conditional novelty 4.0 of 10

    Fine-tuning a 1B medical chatbot on LLM-rewritten emotional dialogues improves its emotion scores with only small changes in n-gram overlap with the original medical responses.

Pith tools