Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 2 cited by

IXPE detection of highly polarized X-rays from the magnetar 1E 1841-045

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-11 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read IXPE finds the magnetar 1E 1841-045 highly polarized, with polarization degree rising from about 15% at 2-3 keV to about 55% at 5.5-8 keV and the hard X-ray tail polarized above 65%.

desk verdict Solid energy-resolved detection and a useful new magnetar data point, but the headline component-level polarizations are priors wearing measurement clothes; referee it, and make the authors relabel them. read the letter →

arxiv 2412.15811 v2 pith:WBQQDFFL submitted 2024-12-20 astro-ph.HE

Michela Rigoselli , Roberto Taverna , Sandro Mereghetti , Roberto Turolla , Gian Luca Israel , Silvia Zane , Lorenzo Marra , Fabio Muleri
show 7 more authors
Alice Borghese Francesco Coti Zelati Davide De Grandis Matteo Imbrogno Ruth M.E. Kelly Paolo Esposito Nanda Rea
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords magnetarsX-raypolarimetryIXPE1E1841-045hardtailresonantComptonscatteringsynchrotronradiationsupernovaremnantKes73
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports that the Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer observed the magnetar 1E 1841-045 shortly after its August 2024 burst-active phase and found its 2-8 keV X-ray emission to be strongly polarized, with the polarization degree rising monotonically from about 15% at 2-3 keV to about 55% at 5.5-8 keV while the polarization angle stays near celestial north. Combining IXPE with simultaneous NuSTAR spectra, the authors decompose the 2-79 keV emission into a soft thermal component plus two power laws, or two blackbodies plus one power law. The spectro-polarimetric decomposition assigns the soft thermal component a polarization of at most about 25%, the intermediate power law about 30%, consistent with resonant Compton scattering in the magnetosphere, and the hard power law more than 65%. If correct, this is the first measurement of hard X-ray tail polarization in a magnetar and it favors synchrotron or curvature radiation as the tail's origin.

What carries the argument

The measurement is carried by IXPE's imaging polarimetry in the 2-8 keV band, which yields normalized Stokes parameters $Q/I$ and $U/I$; the argument is built from the energy-resolved polarization spectrum and a spectro-polarimetric fit that convolves each spectral component with a constant-polarization model. The key physical yardsticks are the resonant Compton scattering prediction of about 33% polarization in the magnetosphere, the synchrotron prediction of about 75% for an electron power law with photon index near 1, and the expectation that vacuum birefringence locks the observed polarization angle to the projected magnetic field direction.

What would settle it

A direct polarimetric measurement of the 8-79 keV emission with a future hard-X-ray polarimeter that returns a polarization degree below about 65%, or inconsistent with the roughly 75% synchrotron expectation, would falsify the paper's central attribution of the hard tail to synchrotron or curvature radiation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that 1E 1841-045 is highly polarized across the IXPE band, with a phase-averaged polarization degree of $(25.9 \pm 3.1)\%$ and a polarization angle of $(1.1 \pm 3.5)^\circ$, and that the polarization degree increases with energy while the angle remains constant. The broadband spectrum requires three components; in the blackbody plus two power-laws decomposition, the hard power law must be polarized above 65% once the intermediate power law is fixed to the resonant Compton scattering prediction of 33%, which is consistent with synchrotron or curvature radiation from a power-law electron distribution. The soft thermal component stays below about 25% polarization, pointing to a condensed surface or bombarded atmosphere rather than a strongly magnetized passive atmosphere.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the intermediate spectral component is polarized at the resonant Compton scattering value of 33%, or in the alternate setup that the hard component is at 75%, and that each component's polarization stays constant across the IXPE band; if those priors are wrong, the hard-tail polarization above 65% is not uniquely determined.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The hard X-ray tail of magnetars, previously detected but of uncertain origin, is observationally tied to synchrotron or curvature radiation if this polarization measurement is correct.
  • The monotonic rise in polarization degree at constant angle joins 1E 1841-045 with 1RXS J1708, suggesting a common magnetospheric emission structure across magnetar sources.
  • The low polarization of the soft thermal component rules out a strongly magnetized passive atmosphere and points to a condensed surface or bombarded atmosphere.
  • The phase-resolved polarization degree broadly follows the pulse profile, indicating that the polarization pattern is tied to the rotating magnetic geometry.
  • Future hard X-ray polarimetric observations can test the tail polarization directly without the assumptions needed for the spectral decomposition.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • In the editor's reading, the above-65% hard-tail polarization is only as secure as the prior that the intermediate component is polarized at 33%, so a direct measurement of the tail above 8 keV would remove that dependence.
  • The close similarity to 1RXS J1708 suggests the same three-layer picture of a thermal surface, resonant Compton scattering, and a synchrotron tail may organize other magnetar spectra; re-running this decomposition on archival IXPE data would test that.
  • A testable extension is that if the hard tail is synchrotron, its polarization angle should follow the rotating-vector-model swing with pulse phase at energies above 4 keV, which a longer IXPE exposure could check.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports the first IXPE polarimetric observation of the magnetar 1E 1841−045, obtained about one month after a burst-active phase, together with simultaneous NuSTAR spectroscopy and archival XMM-Newton, Chandra, and NuSTAR data. The central results are: (i) the 2–8 keV emission is polarized with PD = 25.9 ± 3.1% at PA ≈ 1°, detected at ≳8σ; (ii) the polarization degree rises monotonically from ≈15% at 2–3 keV to ≈55% at 5.5–8 keV at roughly constant angle; (iii) the broadband spectrum requires three components, modeled either as BB+BB+PL or BB+PL+PL; (iv) a spectro-polarimetric decomposition assigns a polarization of ≲25% to the soft thermal component, ≈30% to the intermediate power law (interpreted as resonant Compton scattering), and >65% to the hard power law (interpreted as synchrotron/curvature). The paper also documents pre- and post-burst flux and pulse-profile changes.

Significance. If the component-level results hold, this is the first measurement of the polarization of a magnetar's hard X-ray tail and would place a strong constraint on its emission mechanism. The energy-dependent IXPE detection itself is robust: the integrated detection is well above MDP99, each of the four energy bins is >3σ, and the two independent analysis methods (pcube and XSPEC polconst fits) agree. The careful treatment of the SNR Kes 73 contamination using Chandra data is a methodological strength, as is the use of simultaneous IXPE and NuSTAR data to tie the low- and high-energy behavior. The main weakness is that the hard-tail polarization >65% is not directly measured but is inferred from a spectro-polarimetric decomposition in which one component's polarization must be fixed a priori; the manuscript does not fully acknowledge the model-dependence of this headline claim.

major comments (3)
  1. [§3.2.3, Figure 7, Abstract, §4, §5] The claim that the hard power law is polarized above 65% is conditional on the prior assumption that the intermediate power law has PD = 33%, the RCS prediction. In model 2 (BB+PL+PL), the text states that a fit with all polarization parameters free is 'particularly poor, with all the parameters unconstrained.' The constrained results are obtained by fixing one component: in panel B the hard PL is fixed at 75% (so its polarization is an input, not an output), and in panel C the soft PL is fixed at 33%, from which the hard PL emerges at ≈65%. The Discussion's sentence that the hard PL 'turns out to be polarized at more than 65%, regardless of which component is actually frozen' is therefore an overstatement: no case with the blackbody frozen is shown, and in one of the two displayed cases the hard PL value is imposed. The abstract and conclusions present 'exceeding 65%' as a measured property, whereas it is a model-dependent estimate whose central value is close to what the RCS assumption for the intermediate component would produce.
  2. [§3.2.3 and §4] There is a partially circular consistency argument. The intermediate power law is fixed to the RCS prediction of 33% (with PA=0°), and the paper then states that the resulting ≈30% polarization is 'consistent with predictions for resonant Compton scattering.' Similarly, fixing the hard PL at 75%, the synchrotron expectation, and then finding that the hard tail is compatible with synchrotron does not constitute an independent test of the emission mechanism. To support the interpretation, the authors should show a sensitivity scan in which the assumed polarization of the frozen component is varied over a grid (e.g., the intermediate PL from 0% to 60%) and the derived hard-PL polarization is plotted as a function of that assumption; this would demonstrate how strongly the headline value depends on the prior. Without such a scan, the RCS/synchrotron conclusions should be presented as model-dependent possibilities, not as measured properties.
  3. [§3.2.3] The decomposition assumes that each spectral component has a constant polarization degree and angle across the entire IXPE band. This assumption is acknowledged in the text but is load-bearing for the component-level values. The energy-resolved PD changes by a factor of ~3.5 across 2–8 keV, so if, for example, the intermediate power law's polarization varies within the band, the derived hard-PL value would shift. The paper should either justify the constant-polarization ansatz more strongly (e.g., by testing a two-bin split for the free component) or add a caveat in the abstract and conclusions that the quoted component polarizations rely on this assumption.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Header, author list] The author list contains a typo: 'F abio Muleri' should be 'Fabio Muleri'.
  2. [Table 3] The integrated 2–8 keV significance is reported as 8.3σ (pcube) and 10.5σ (XSPEC); the text quotes '≳8σ'. For consistency, the text could state the range or explicitly cite the pcube value.
  3. [§3.2.3] The naming of model 1 and model 2 is easy to confuse because model 1 is BB+BB+PL and model 2 is BB+PL+PL, while the order in the text sometimes lists 'BB+PL+PL' first. Defining the models in a small table or in the text with explicit component lists would improve readability.
  4. [§3.1.2] The phrase 'Following the approach discussed in 3.1.1' should be 'in Section 3.1.1' for clarity.
  5. [§4, footnote 4] The dependence of the reported flux increase (10% vs 40%) on the choice of reference instrument for cross-calibration is important for interpreting the source's post-burst brightening; it is currently relegated to a footnote and deserves a sentence in the main discussion.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 5.0 of 10

The claimed >65% hard-tail polarization is not a free measurement: it follows from fixing the hard PL at 75% (input) or freezing the soft PL at the 33% RCS value, and the Discussion overstates the evidence.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 3.2.3 (model 2 constrained fits), echoed in Section 4 Discussion and Section 5 Conclusions]
    "for model 2 we fixed the PD of the hard PL, taking 75% as representative of synchrotron emission (see e.g. Rybicki & Lightman 1979). ... We then froze this parameter at 33%, imposing again PA = 0◦ ... the degree of polarization of the hard PL is well constrained at PD ≈ 65% ... fixing the polarization parameters of one of the spectral components produces a reasonably constrained fit, and the hard PL turns out to be polarized at more than 65%, regardless of which component is actually frozen."

    Section 3.2.3 admits that a fit with all polarization parameters free is 'particularly poor, with all the parameters unconstrained,' so component polarizations are not free measurements. The >65% hard-PL claim rests on two constrained runs: run B fixes hard PL PD at 75% (synchrotron), making >65% true by construction; run C fixes soft PL at 33% (RCS, Taverna et al. 2020) and returns hard PL ≈65%. The Discussion's 'regardless of which component is actually frozen' conflates input with output; no BB-frozen case is shown, and in model 1 the hard PL is fixed to the measured ≈53% (5.5–8 keV) instead. The abstract and conclusions elevate this conditional estimate to a measured property.

full rationale

The energy-resolved IXPE polarization analysis (§3.2.1) is self-contained and non-circular: PD and PA are derived directly from measured Stokes parameters with two independent methods (ixpeobssim pcube and XSPEC polconst convolved on a fixed spectral model), the integrated detection is ≳8σ with PD 25.9±3.1% versus MDP99 9.5%, and per-bin detections are >3σ. The phase-resolved analysis is similarly direct. The circularity is confined to the spectro-polarimetric decomposition of §3.2.3, which supports the component-level claims in the abstract and conclusions. There the authors state that leaving all polarization parameters free leaves the fit unconstrained; the quoted hard-PL >65% polarization is obtained only after freezing the hard PL at 75% (an input, in one run) or freezing the soft PL at the RCS 33% value (a prior from the authors' Taverna et al. 2020 model) in another. The 'regardless of which component is actually frozen' framing is therefore an overstatement: one branch is tautological, the other is prior-conditional, and the BB-frozen case is not shown. The alternative model 1 fixes the hard PL at the directly measured ≈53%, so >65% is not a model-independent fact. Because the central new measurement (energy-dependent PD, constant PA) is independently established and the paper is transparent about the unconstrained free fits, the score is 5.0 rather than higher: the independent content is substantial, but the headline hard-tail >65% polarization is partially built into the chosen constraints.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central polarization detection is model-independent, but the component-level polarizations (30% and >65%) are derived under spectral decomposition assumptions and by fixing some components to theoretical predictions. These hand-set values and spectral parameters are the price paid to assign polarization to individual emission components.

free parameters (9)
  • NH (column density) = 2.20 x 10^22 cm^-2 (pre-burst), frozen for post-burst
    Free in spectral fits; affects the flux and component normalizations. The post-burst value is fixed to the pre-burst best fit.
  • kT_BB1 = 0.491 keV (pre), 0.501 keV (post)
    Soft blackbody temperature in the spectral decomposition.
  • R_BB1 = 3.94 km (pre), 4.62 km (post)
    Soft blackbody radius at 8.5 kpc.
  • Gamma_soft (PL2) = 2.5 (pre), 2.4 (post)
    Photon index of the intermediate power-law component.
  • Gamma_hard (PL3) = 0.93 (pre), 1.1 (post)
    Photon index of the hard power-law component.
  • Cross-calibration constants (NuSTAR/IXPE) = ~1.3
    Multiplicative constants accounting for instrument cross-calibration; the 10% vs 40% flux increase depends on the choice of reference instrument.
  • Hard PL polarization fixed at 75% = 75%
    Chosen by hand as representative of synchrotron emission (Section 3.2.3) to constrain other components; not fitted to data.
  • Soft PL polarization fixed at 33% = 33%
    Chosen by hand as the RCS prediction (Taverna et al. 2020) to derive the hard PL polarization in one configuration (Section 3.2.3).
  • SNR polarization fixed to 0 = 0%
    Assumed negligible based on other SNRs observed by IXPE (Section 3.2.3).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The X-ray spectrum of the magnetar is well described by a blackbody plus two power laws (or two blackbodies plus one power law) with the given component separation.
    The spectro-polarimetric decomposition (Section 3.2.3) relies on this spectral model; alternative models change the polarization assignment.
  • domain assumption Each spectral component has a constant polarization degree and angle across the IXPE 2-8 keV band.
    Assumed in the spectro-polarimetric fits (Section 3.2.3); the paper notes the data are consistent but cannot strongly constrain energy dependence within components.
  • domain assumption The SNR Kes 73 contribution is unpolarized and its spectrum is correctly modeled from Chandra data.
    Used to subtract SNR counts; if the SNR has residual polarization, the source PD could be biased (Section 3.2.3).
  • domain assumption Vacuum birefringence fixes the polarization angle at the polarization-limiting radius, so observed PA is tied to the magnetic field geometry.
    Interpretation of the constant PA in Section 4 relies on this standard magnetar theory.
  • ad hoc to paper The resonant Compton scattering prediction of ~33% polarization applies to the intermediate power-law component.
    Used to fix the soft PL polarization to derive the hard PL polarization (Section 3.2.3); this is a theoretical prior rather than an independent measurement.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of IXPE detection of highly polarized X-rays from the magnetar 1E 1841-045." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WBQQDFFL

@misc{pith2026241215811,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: IXPE detection of highly polarized X-rays from the magnetar 1E 1841-045},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WBQQDFFL}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2412.15811}
}
read the original abstract

The Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE) observed for the first time highly polarized X-ray emission from the magnetar 1E 1841-045, targeted after a burst-active phase in August 2024. To date, IXPE has observed four other magnetars during quiescent periods, highlighting substantially different polarization properties. 1E 1841-045 exhibits a high, energy-dependent polarization degree, which increases monotonically from ~15% at 2-3 keV up to ~55% at 5.5-8 keV, while the polarization angle, aligned with the celestial North, remains fairly constant. The broadband spectrum (2-79 keV) obtained by combining simultaneous IXPE and NuSTAR data is well modeled by a blackbody and two power-law components. The unabsorbed 2-8 keV flux (~2E-11 erg/cm2/s) is about 10% higher than that obtained from archival XMM-Newton and NuSTAR observations. The polarization of the soft, thermal component does not exceed ~25%, and may be produced by a condensed surface or a bombarded atmosphere. The intermediate power law is polarized at around 30%, consistent with predictions for resonant Compton scattering in the star magnetosphere; while, the hard power law exhibits a polarization degree exceeding 65%, pointing to a synchrotron/curvature origin.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2412.15811 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Chandra mosaic of SNR Kes 73. The solid white circles mark the three annular extraction regions for the SNR spectrum, at r SNR int = 6′′ (innermost circle, common to all three) and r SNR ext = 15′′, 48′′ and 60′′ (outer circles). The dashed magenta circles mark the extraction region used for the background of XMM-Newton, NuSTAR and IXPE data: r bkg int = 150′′ and r bkg ext = 240′′ . (MOS1/2 cameras, Turner et al. 2… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Best fit and residuals to the XMM-Newton (EPIC-pn in black, MOS1 and MOS2 in red and green respectively) and NuSTAR (FPMA and FPMB detectors in blue and cyan respectively) pre-burst data. The solid lines show the single components of the models, while the dashed lines show the SNR contribution as computed in §2.2, which was kept fixed in all fits. The plotted spectra were rebinned to improve visualization and single… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Best fit and residuals to the IXPE (DU1, DU2 and DU3 in black, red and green respectively) and NuSTAR (FPMA and FPMB detectors in blue and cyan respectively) 2024 data. Line code is as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Polar plot of the energy-dependent PD and PA obtained using XSPEC (see text for details). Filled and empty contours correspond to the 68% and 99% confidence regions, respectively, around the most probable values reported in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: IXPE count rate (left panel), polarization degree (central panel) and polarization angle (right panel) as a function of the rotational phase; two cycles are shown for clarity. Results are presented for the 2–8 (blue), 2–4 (orange) and 4–8 keV (green) energy ranges. Pol…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Polarization of the single spectral components (see text for details). Filled and empty contours correspond to the 68% and 99% confidence regions, respectively, around the most probable values; crosses mark the values at which PD and PA were frozen for the specified co…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Background-subtracted EPIC-pn pulse profiles in the 2–8 (blue), 2–4 (orange) and 4–8 keV (green) energy bands (left panel). The three rightmost panels show the NuSTAR pulse profiles in the 2–79 (red), 2–8 (blue) and 8–79 keV (black) energy bands at three different epoc…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Energy dependence of the linear polarization degree (left panel) and polarization angle (right panel) of the five magnetars observed with IXPE. Thin lines indicate results for the total energy range (in case of significant polarization detection in the 2–8 keV range). …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 2 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. X-ray polarization of the magnetar 1E 1841-045

    astro-ph.HE 2024-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    The first IXPE observation of a magnetar during an outburst shows its hard X-ray tail is highly polarized, with the polarization degree rising from 15% at 2-3 keV to 70% at 6-8 keV.

  2. Proof of Concept Measurements of Laterally Graded Multilayers for Soft X-ray Spectropolarimetry

    astro-ph.IM 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    Cr/Sc and W/B4C laterally graded multilayer mirrors modulate soft X-ray reflection with polarization angle, showing ~100% modulation at Brewster angle and ~80% at 30° incidence.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages · cited by 2 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    M., et al

    An, H., Hasco¨ et, R., Kaspi, V. M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 779, 163, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/779/2/163

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/779/2/163 2013

  2. [2]

    1989, GeoCoA, 53, 197, doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-X

    Anders, E., & Grevesse, N. 1989, GeoCoA, 53, 197, doi: 10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-X

    doi:10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-x 1989

  3. [3]

    Arnaud, K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes, 17 15 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., e...

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 1996

  4. [4]

    2018, Astrophysics Source Code Library, ascl:1805.019

    Bachetti, M. 2018, Astrophysics Source Code Library, ascl:1805.019

    work page 2018

  5. [5]

    2022, SoftwareX, 19, 101194, doi: 10.1016/j.softx.2022.101194

    Baldini, L., Bucciantini, N., Di Lalla, N., et al. 2022, SoftwareX, 19, 101194, doi: 10.1016/j.softx.2022.101194

    arXiv 2022

  6. [6]

    G., Gonthier, P

    Baring, M. G., Gonthier, P. L., & Harding, A. K. 2005, ApJ, 630, 430, doi: 10.1086/431895

    doi:10.1086/431895 2005

  7. [7]

    G., & Harding, A

    Baring, M. G., & Harding, A. K. 2008, in American Institute of Physics Conference Series, Vol. 968, Astrophysics of Compact Objects, ed. Y.-F. Yuan, X.-D. Li, & D. Lai (AIP), 93–100, doi: 10.1063/1.2840459

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2840459 2008

  8. [8]

    D., Kennea, J

    Barthelmy, S. D., Kennea, J. A., Marshall, F. E., Maselli, A., & Sbarufatti, B. 2015, GRB Coordinates Network, 18024, 1

    work page 2015

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    Beloborodov, A. M. 2013, ApJ, 762, 13, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/762/1/13

    2013 doi

  2. [10]

    2022, MNRAS, 514, 5024, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1571 Coti Zelati, F., Rea, N., Pons, J

    Caiazzo, I., Gonz´ alez-Caniulef, D., Heyl, J., & Fern´ andez, R. 2022, MNRAS, 514, 5024, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac1571 Coti Zelati, F., Rea, N., Pons, J. A., Campana, S., &

    2022 doi

  3. [11]

    2018, MNRAS, 474, 961, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2679 De Angelis, A., Tatischeff, V., Argan, A., et al

    Esposito, P. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 961, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx2679 De Angelis, A., Tatischeff, V., Argan, A., et al. 2021, Experimental Astronomy, 51, 1225, doi: 10.1007/s10686-021-09706-y den Hartog, P. R., Kuiper, L., & Hermsen, W. 2008a, A&A, 489, 263, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20...

    2018 doi

  4. [12]

    Dib, R., & Kaspi, V. M. 2014, ApJ, 784, 37, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/784/1/37

    2014 doi

  5. [13]

    C., & Thompson, C

    Duncan, R. C., & Thompson, C. 1992, ApJL, 392, L9, doi: 10.1086/186413

    1992 doi

  6. [14]

    Esposito, P., Rea, N., & Israel, G. L. 2021, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 461, Timing Neutron Stars: Pulsations, Oscillations and Explosions, ed. T. M

    2021

  7. [15]

    M´ endez, & C

    Belloni, M. M´ endez, & C. Zhang, 97–142, doi: 10.1007/978-3-662-62110-3 3 Fermi GBM Team. 2024, GRB Coordinates Network, 37234, 1 Fern´ andez, R., & Davis, S. W. 2011, ApJ, 730, 131, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/730/2/131

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    C., Allen, G

    Fruscione, A., McDowell, J. C., Allen, G. E., et al. 2006, in Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers (SPIE) Conference Series, Vol. 6270, Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems, ed. D. R. Silva & R. E. Doxsey, 62701V, doi: 10.1117/12.671760 GECA...

    2006 doi

  9. [17]

    N., & Pavlov, G

    Gnedin, Y. N., & Pavlov, G. G. 1974, Soviet Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics, 38, 903 G¨ otz, D., Mereghetti, S., Tiengo, A., & Esposito, P. 2006, A&A, 449, L31, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20064870

    1974 doi

  10. [18]

    K., & Lai, D

    Harding, A. K., & Lai, D. 2006, Reports on Progress in Physics, 69, 2631, doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/69/9/R03

    2006 doi

  11. [19]

    A., Craig, W

    Harrison, F. A., Craig, W. W., Christensen, F. E., et al. 2013, ApJ, 770, 103, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/103

    2013 doi

  12. [20]

    2024, MNRAS, 527, 12219, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3680

    Heyl, J., Taverna, R., Turolla, R., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 527, 12219, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad3680

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    S., & Shaviv, N

    Heyl, J. S., & Shaviv, N. J. 2002, PhRvD, 66, 023002, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevD.66.023002

    2002 doi

  14. [22]

    M., & Beloborodov, A

    Kaspi, V. M., & Beloborodov, A. M. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 261, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023329

    2017 doi

  15. [23]

    Kelly, R. M. E., Gonz´ alez-Caniulef, D., Zane, S., Turolla, R., & Taverna, R. 2024a, MNRAS, 534, 1355, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2163

    doi

  16. [24]

    Kelly, R. M. E., Zane, S., Turolla, R., & Taverna, R. 2024b, MNRAS, 528, 3927, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae159

    doi

  17. [25]

    R., & Collmar, W

    Kuiper, L., Hermsen, W., den Hartog, P. R., & Collmar, W. 2006, ApJ, 645, 556, doi: 10.1086/504317

    2006 doi

  18. [26]

    2004, ApJ, 613, 1173, doi: 10.1086/423129

    Kuiper, L., Hermsen, W., & Mendez, M. 2004, ApJ, 613, 1173, doi: 10.1086/423129

    2004 doi

  19. [27]

    S., & Safi-Harb, S

    Kumar, H. S., & Safi-Harb, S. 2010, ApJL, 725, L191, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/725/2/L191

    2010 doi

  20. [28]

    S., Safi-Harb, S., Slane, P

    Kumar, H. S., Safi-Harb, S., Slane, P. O., & Gotthelf, E. V. 2014, ApJ, 781, 41, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/781/1/41

    2014 doi

  21. [29]

    2021, Experimental Astronomy, 51, 1143, doi: 10.1007/s10686-021-09723-x

    Laurent, P., Acero, F., Beckmann, V., et al. 2021, Experimental Astronomy, 51, 1143, doi: 10.1007/s10686-021-09723-x

    2021 doi

  22. [30]

    F., & Hurley, K

    Mereghetti, S., G¨ otz, D., Mirabel, I. F., & Hurley, K. 2005, A&A, 433, L9, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200500088

    2005 doi

  23. [31]

    2005, A&A, 433, L13, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200500087

    Molkov, S., Hurley, K., Sunyaev, R., et al. 2005, A&A, 433, L13, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:200500087

    2005 doi

  24. [32]

    2003, PASJ, 55, L45, doi: 10.1093/pasj/55.3.L45 NICER Team

    Morii, M., Sato, R., Kataoka, J., & Kawai, N. 2003, PASJ, 55, L45, doi: 10.1093/pasj/55.3.L45 NICER Team. 2024, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16789, 1

    2003 doi

  25. [33]

    A., & Kaspi, V

    Olausen, S. A., & Kaspi, V. M. 2014, ApJS, 212, 6, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/212/1/6

    2014 doi

  26. [34]

    Radhakrishnan, V., & Cooke, D. J. 1969, Astrophys. Lett., 3, 225

    1969

  27. [35]

    B., & Lightman, A

    Rybicki, G. B., & Lightman, A. P. 1979, Radiative processes in astrophysics (Wiley-Interscience) 16

    1979

  28. [36]

    2024, Galaxies, 12, 59, doi: 10.3390/galaxies12050059

    Slane, P., Ferrazzoli, R., Zhou, P., & Vink, J. 2024, Galaxies, 12, 59, doi: 10.3390/galaxies12050059

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.16036, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.16036 Str¨ uder, L., Briel, U., Dennerl, K., et al

    Stewart, R., Younes, G., Harding, A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.16036, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.16036 Str¨ uder, L., Briel, U., Dennerl, K., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L18, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20000066 SVOM/GRM Team. 2024, GRB Coordinates Network, 37297, 1 Swift T...

    2024 doi arXiv

  30. [38]

    2014, MNRAS, 438, 1686, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2310

    Taverna, R., Muleri, F., Turolla, R., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 438, 1686, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt2310

    2014 doi

  31. [39]

    2024, Galaxies, 12, 6, doi: 10.3390/galaxies12010006

    Taverna, R., & Turolla, R. 2024, Galaxies, 12, 6, doi: 10.3390/galaxies12010006

    2024 doi

  32. [40]

    2015, MNRAS, 454, 3254, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2168

    Taverna, R., Turolla, R., Gonzalez Caniulef, D., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 454, 3254, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2168

    2015 doi

  33. [41]

    Y., & Zane, S

    Taverna, R., Turolla, R., Suleimanov, V., Potekhin, A. Y., & Zane, S. 2020, MNRAS, 492, 5057, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa204

    2020 doi

  34. [42]

    2022, Science, 378, 646, doi: 10.1126/science.add0080

    Taverna, R., Turolla, R., Muleri, F., et al. 2022, Science, 378, 646, doi: 10.1126/science.add0080

    2022 doi

  35. [43]

    Thompson, C., & Beloborodov, A. M. 2005, ApJ, 634, 565, doi: 10.1086/432245

    2005 doi

  36. [44]

    Thompson, C., & Duncan, R. C. 1993, ApJ, 408, 194, doi: 10.1086/172580

    1993 doi

  37. [45]

    W., & Leahy, D

    Tian, W. W., & Leahy, D. A. 2008, ApJ, 677, 292, doi: 10.1086/529120

    2008 doi

  38. [46]

    Turner, M. J. L., Abbey, A., Arnaud, M., et al. 2001, A&A, 365, L27, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20000087

    2001 doi

  39. [47]

    Turolla, R., Zane, S., & Watts, A. L. 2015, Reports on Progress in Physics, 78, 116901, doi: 10.1088/0034-4885/78/11/116901

    2015 doi

  40. [48]

    L., et al

    Turolla, R., Taverna, R., Israel, G. L., et al. 2023, ApJ, 954, 88, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aced05

    2023 doi

  41. [49]

    Vasisht, G., & Gotthelf, E. V. 1997, ApJL, 486, L129, doi: 10.1086/310843

    1997 doi

  42. [50]

    K., Hasco¨ et, R., Kaspi, V

    Vogel, J. K., Hasco¨ et, R., Kaspi, V. M., et al. 2014, ApJ, 789, 75, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/789/1/75

    2014 doi

  43. [51]

    K., Kouveliotou, C., et al

    Wachter, S., Patel, S. K., Kouveliotou, C., et al. 2004, ApJ, 615, 887, doi: 10.1086/424704

    2004 doi

  44. [52]

    G., Gonthier, P

    Wadiasingh, Z., Baring, M. G., Gonthier, P. L., & Harding, A. K. 2018, ApJ, 854, 98, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa460

    2018 doi

  45. [53]

    C., Guainazzi, M., Jahoda, K., et al

    Weisskopf, M. C., Guainazzi, M., Jahoda, K., et al. 2010, ApJ, 713, 912, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/713/2/912

    2010 doi

  46. [54]

    C., Soffitta, P., Baldini, L., et al

    Weisskopf, M. C., Soffitta, P., Baldini, L., et al. 2022, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 8, 1 , doi: 10.1117/1.JATIS.8.2.026002

    2022 doi

  47. [55]

    F., Vogel, J

    Yang, C., Archibald, R. F., Vogel, J. K., et al. 2016, ApJ, 831, 80, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/831/1/80

    2016 doi

  48. [56]

    P., Enoto, T., et al

    Younes, G., Hu, C. P., Enoto, T., et al. 2024, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16802, 1

    2024

  49. [57]

    2023, ApJL, 944, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acb703

    Zane, S., Taverna, R., Gonz´ alez-Caniulef, D., et al. 2023, ApJL, 944, L27, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acb703

    2023 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 11, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.