REVIEW 2 cited by
Asking Again and Again: Exploring LLM Robustness to Repeated Questions
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
This study investigates whether repeating questions within prompts influences the performance of large language models (LLMs). We hypothesize that reiterating a question within a single prompt might enhance the model's focus on key elements of the query. We evaluate five recent LLMs -- including GPT-4o-mini, DeepSeek-V3, and smaller open-source models -- on three reading comprehension datasets under different prompt settings, varying question repetition levels (1, 3, or 5 times per prompt). Our results demonstrate that question repetition can increase models' accuracy by up to $6\%$. However, across all models, settings, and datasets, we do not find the result statistically significant. These findings provide insights into prompt design and LLM behavior, suggesting that repetition alone does not significantly impact output quality.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Large Language Models Are Overconfident in Their Own Responses
Instruction-tuned LLMs exhibit an ownership bias, assigning up to 26% higher confidence to their own responses than identical user-provided answers; reframing the answer as user input during elicitation reduces overco...
-
Ask Twice, Look Twice: Prompt Echoing Resolves the Question-First Paradox in Vision-Language Models
Repeating the question on both sides of the image (question echoing) closes the question-first accuracy gap in five open VLMs and beats standard single-pass orderings on several VQA benchmarks.
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.