REVIEW 2 cited by
Levels of AI Agents: from Rules to Large Language Models
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
read the original abstract
AI agents are defined as artificial entities to perceive the environment, make decisions and take actions. Inspired by the 6 levels of autonomous driving by Society of Automotive Engineers, the AI agents are also categorized based on utilities and strongness, as the following levels: L0, no AI, with tools taking into account perception plus actions; L1, using rule-based AI; L2, making rule-based AI replaced by IL/RL-based AI, with additional reasoning & decision making; L3, applying LLM-based AI instead of IL/RL-based AI, additionally setting up memory & reflection; L4, based on L3, facilitating autonomous learning & generalization; L5, based on L4, appending personality of emotion and character and collaborative behavior with multi-agents.
Forward citations
Cited by 2 Pith papers
-
Toward Edge General Intelligence with Multiple-Large Language Model (Multi-LLM): Architecture, Trust, and Orchestration
A survey of multi-LLM systems in edge computing, covering architectures, enabling technologies, trust mechanisms, applications, and open datasets for edge general intelligence.
-
Distributed Approach to Haskell Based Applications Refactoring with LLMs Based Multi-Agent Systems
An LLM-based multi-agent system for Haskell refactoring reports reduced cyclomatic complexity and memory allocation on two codebases, but the evaluation lacks reproducibility and contains inconsistent numbers.
Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.