pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.06986 · v1 · pith:WFZM7C3Onew · submitted 2026-06-05 · 💻 cs.LG

Heterogeneous Effects of Green Finance on Urban Decarbonization: Evidence from 285 Cities in China

Xueyang Li , Jinlei Ma This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-27 22:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 💻 cs.LG
keywords Green FinanceCarbon IntensityDecarbonizationMachine LearningChina CitiesEnergy StructureHeterogeneous EffectsSpatial Spillovers
0
0 comments X

The pith

Green finance reduces carbon intensity in Chinese cities, with strongest effects from bonds and investment in smaller cities.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper tests whether green finance reduces carbon intensity across 285 Chinese cities and identifies how the effects differ by financial tool and city size. It shows that green finance does lower carbon intensity overall, with green bonds and green investment producing the largest reductions and generating spillovers to nearby cities. The reductions are biggest in fourth- and fifth-tier cities and occur chiefly by shifting the energy mix, with smaller roles for industrial changes, foreign investment, and innovation. The findings indicate that financial instruments can support decarbonization but require region-specific design to reach lower-development areas effectively.

Core claim

Green finance significantly lowers carbon intensity, with green bonds and green investment having the strongest impacts and evident spatial spillovers. The effects vary by development level, being most pronounced in Fourth- and Fifth-tier cities. Mediation analysis reveals that green finance operates mainly through energy structure optimization, followed by industrial upgrading, foreign direct investment, and technological innovation. SHAP analysis confirms substantial differences across financial instruments, with green bonds, funds, and credit contributing most to decarbonization. The marginal impact is stronger in cities with low technological capacity, high industrial dependency, and coa

What carries the argument

Econometric models combined with mediation analysis and machine-learning SHAP values to measure the size and channels of green-finance effects on city carbon intensity.

If this is right

  • Green bonds and green investment should receive priority because they deliver the largest measured reductions.
  • Fourth- and fifth-tier cities should receive focused green-finance support to capture the largest gains.
  • Energy-structure changes are the main transmission channel, so policies must link finance to energy shifts.
  • Spatial spillovers imply that uncoordinated city-level programs may understate total benefits.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The same tier-based pattern may appear in other countries that have uneven urban development levels.
  • Better city-level emissions data could either strengthen or revise the estimated size of the effects.
  • Pairing green finance with targeted technology programs might raise impacts in cities that currently respond less.

Load-bearing premise

The econometric models correctly isolate the causal effect of green finance on carbon intensity without material omitted-variable bias, reverse causality, or measurement error in the city-level financial and emissions data.

What would settle it

A re-estimation that finds no carbon-intensity reduction after adding controls for local growth policies or using alternative green-finance measures would disprove the central claim.

read the original abstract

While green finance has become a key instrument for low-carbon city transitions, its actual decarbonization effects and transmission mechanisms remain unclear. This study employs econometric models and machine learning-based analysis to examine whether and how green finance reduces city-level carbon intensity. Results show that green finance significantly lowers carbon intensity, with green bonds and green investment having the strongest impacts and evident spatial spillovers. The effects vary by development level, being most pronounced in Fourth- and Fifth-tier cities. Mediation analysis reveals that green finance operates mainly through energy structure optimization, followed by industrial upgrading, foreign direct investment, and technological innovation. SHAP analysis confirms substantial differences across financial instruments, with green bonds, funds, and credit contributing most to decarbonization. Moreover, the marginal impact is stronger in cities with low technological capacity, high industrial dependency, and coal-based energy mixes. These findings provide theoretical support and policy guidance for building a multi-level, regionally differentiated green finance system to promote inclusive low-carbon transitions. Keywords: Green Finance; Carbon Intensity; Decarbonization Effect; Machine Learning; City

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

2 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that green finance significantly lowers carbon intensity across 285 Chinese cities, with the strongest effects from green bonds and green investment, clear spatial spillovers, greater impacts in fourth- and fifth-tier cities, and primary mediation through energy structure optimization (followed by industrial upgrading, FDI, and innovation); these results are obtained via panel econometric models plus SHAP-based machine learning analysis of heterogeneity by city characteristics.

Significance. If the causal identification holds, the findings would supply city-level evidence on differentiated green-finance instruments and mechanisms for decarbonization in a major developing economy, with policy relevance for regionally tailored systems; the combination of standard econometrics with SHAP values for instrument-specific attributions is a methodological strength that could be replicated elsewhere.

major comments (2)
  1. [Methods and Results] The econometric specifications (described in the methods and results sections) rely on fixed-effects panel regressions with controls but provide no explicit identification strategy—such as an instrument for green-finance flows, a staggered-adoption design, or credible matching that survives placebo tests—to isolate causal effects from policy endogeneity or reverse causality; city-level green-finance allocation is determined by the same local governments that shape emissions trajectories, rendering the headline coefficients and mediation results vulnerable to omitted-variable bias.
  2. [SHAP and Heterogeneity Analysis] The SHAP analysis and heterogeneity findings (by city tier, technological capacity, and energy mix) inherit the same identification problem as the underlying regressions; without first establishing that the green-finance coefficients are not confounded, the machine-learning attributions cannot be interpreted as causal marginal impacts.
minor comments (2)
  1. The abstract and keywords list results but the manuscript should include a dedicated data section with precise definitions, sources, and summary statistics for all variables (green finance instruments, carbon intensity, mediators) to allow replication.
  2. Table and figure captions could be expanded to state the exact specification (e.g., fixed effects, controls, clustering) used for each reported coefficient or SHAP value.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for the constructive comments on identification. We address each point below and propose targeted revisions to clarify assumptions and limitations while preserving the paper's core contributions on associations and heterogeneity.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: [Methods and Results] The econometric specifications (described in the methods and results sections) rely on fixed-effects panel regressions with controls but provide no explicit identification strategy—such as an instrument for green-finance flows, a staggered-adoption design, or credible matching that survives placebo tests—to isolate causal effects from policy endogeneity or reverse causality; city-level green-finance allocation is determined by the same local governments that shape emissions trajectories, rendering the headline coefficients and mediation results vulnerable to omitted-variable bias.

    Authors: We agree that the specifications rely on two-way fixed effects and controls rather than an instrument or staggered design, and that local policy endogeneity is a valid concern. The paper interprets results as conditional associations after accounting for city and year fixed effects plus observables; we do not claim strict causality. We will revise the abstract, introduction, and conclusion to replace causal language ('lowers', 'effects') with associative phrasing, add an explicit limitations subsection discussing omitted-variable bias and reverse causality, and note that future work could employ IV strategies based on central policy rollouts. No new identification strategy can be added without additional data. revision: partial

  2. Referee: [SHAP and Heterogeneity Analysis] The SHAP analysis and heterogeneity findings (by city tier, technological capacity, and energy mix) inherit the same identification problem as the underlying regressions; without first establishing that the green-finance coefficients are not confounded, the machine-learning attributions cannot be interpreted as causal marginal impacts.

    Authors: The SHAP values are computed on fitted values from the fixed-effects models and therefore inherit the same conditional-association interpretation. We will revise the methods and results sections to state explicitly that SHAP attributions describe feature importance within the estimated model rather than causal marginal effects, and we will cross-reference the new limitations subsection. This clarification does not require new analysis. revision: partial

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: empirical estimation on external data

full rationale

The paper performs panel regressions, mediation analysis, and SHAP interpretation on city-level observational data from 285 Chinese cities. All reported results (coefficients on green finance variables, heterogeneity by city tier, mediation through energy structure, etc.) are direct statistical outputs from the data rather than quantities derived from the authors' own fitted parameters or prior self-citations. No equations redefine a target variable in terms of itself, no fitted parameter is relabeled as an out-of-sample prediction, and no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' earlier work. The analysis is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks and receives the default non-circularity finding.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 2 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review is based solely on the abstract; the paper therefore rests on standard econometric identification assumptions and the validity of the 285-city panel that are not inspectable here.

free parameters (2)
  • regression coefficients on green finance variables
    Fitted to the city panel data; central claim depends on their sign and magnitude.
  • SHAP value attributions across instruments
    Derived from the fitted machine learning model; used to rank contribution of bonds, funds, and credit.
axioms (2)
  • domain assumption No material omitted variable bias or reverse causality between green finance allocation and carbon intensity after controls
    Invoked by the claim that green finance 'significantly lowers' intensity and by the mediation analysis.
  • domain assumption City-tier classification and energy-structure variables are measured without substantial error
    Required for the reported heterogeneity and mediation results.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 5715 in / 1519 out tokens · 20192 ms · 2026-06-27T22:38:55.290425+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 1 canonical work pages · 1 internal anchor

  1. [1]

    Theoretical hypotheses 2.1 Direct effects of green finance on carbon intensity Theoretically, green finance constitutes a critical policy tool for facilitating the transition toward low-carbon development by reallocating financial resources toward environmentally sustainable sectors [39, 40]. Drawing on the theoretical framework of environmental Kuznets c...

  2. [2]

    ecology” “low-carbon

    Methodology 3.1 Methods To comprehensively identify the impact pathways and functional characteristics of green finance on city carbon intensity, this study develops a multi-layered empirical strategy that integrates a random effects panel model, spatial econometric models, and a causal forest model. These models are respectively employed to identify caus...

    2017

  3. [3]

    Core-Periphery

    Results and discussion 4.1 Decarbonization effects of green finance 4.1.1 Baseline regression results To assess the average impact of green finance on city carbon intensity, a fixed effects model is employed for baseline estimation. The results are presented in Table 2. Column (1) shows that the coefficient of GF is -0.1575 and statistically significant a...

    2026

  4. [4]

    dual carbon

    Conclusion and policy recommendations 5.1 Conclusion This study constructs a comprehensive panel dataset of 285 prefecture-level cities in China covering the period from 2000 to 2022, and empirically evaluates the impact of green finance on city carbon intensity. By integrating econometric estimation with non-parametric diagnostic techniques, the analysis...

    2000

  5. [5]

    Fighting Climate Change: International Attitudes toward Climate Policies

    Dechezleprêtre A, Fabre A, Kruse T, Planterose B, Sanchez Chico A, Stantcheva S. Fighting Climate Change: International Attitudes toward Climate Policies. American Economic Review. 2025;115(4):1258–300

    2025

  6. [6]

    AR6 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2023

    IPCC. AR6 Synthesis Report: Climate Change 2023. 2023

    2023

  7. [7]

    Extreme weather should be defined according to impacts on climate-vulnerable communities

    Winter SC, Winter MR, Plaxico L, Balakrishnan AK, Dzombo M, Tabb LP, et al. Extreme weather should be defined according to impacts on climate-vulnerable communities. Nature Climate Change. 2024;14(5):462-7

    2024

  8. [8]

    Global meta-analysis shows action is needed to halt genetic diversity loss

    Shaw RE, Farquharson KA, Bruford MW, Coates DJ, Elliott CP, Mergeay J, et al. Global meta-analysis shows action is needed to halt genetic diversity loss. Nature. 2025;638(8051):704-10

    2025

  9. [9]

    Extreme climate events increase risk of global food insecurity and adaptation needs

    Hasegawa T, Sakurai G, Fujimori S, Takahashi K, Hijioka Y, Masui T. Extreme climate events increase risk of global food insecurity and adaptation needs. Nature Food. 2021;2(8):587-95

    2021

  10. [10]

    Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity

    Vörösmarty CJ, McIntyre PB, Gessner MO, Dudgeon D, Prusevich A, Green P, et al. Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature. 2010;467(7315):555-61

    2010

  11. [11]

    A year above 1.5 °C signals that Earth is most probably within the 20-year period that will reach the Paris Agreement limit

    Bevacqua E, Schleussner C-F, Zscheischler J. A year above 1.5 °C signals that Earth is most probably within the 20-year period that will reach the Paris Agreement limit. Nature Climate Change. 2025;15(3):262-5

    2025

  12. [12]

    Climate change: Strategies for mitigation and adaptation

    Wang F, Harindintwali JD, Wei K, Shan Y, Mi Z, Costello MJ, et al. Climate change: Strategies for mitigation and adaptation. The Innovation Geoscience. 2023;1(1):100015

    2023

  13. [13]

    Challenges and opportunities for carbon neutrality in China

    Liu Z, Deng Z, He G, Wang H, Zhang X, Lin J, et al. Challenges and opportunities for carbon neutrality in China. Nature Reviews Earth & Environment. 2022;3(2):141-55

    2022

  14. [14]

    Air quality and health co-benefits of China’s carbon dioxide emissions peaking before 2030

    Tang R, Zhao J, Liu Y, Huang X, Zhang Y, Zhou D, et al. Air quality and health co-benefits of China’s carbon dioxide emissions peaking before 2030. Nature Communications. 2022;13(1):1008

    2030

  15. [15]

    Chinese cities exhibit varying degrees of decoupling of economic growth and CO2 emissions between 2005 and 2015

    Shan Y, Fang S, Cai B, Zhou Y, Li D, Feng K, et al. Chinese cities exhibit varying degrees of decoupling of economic growth and CO2 emissions between 2005 and 2015. One Earth. 2021;4(1):124-34

    2005

  16. [16]

    The limits to degrowth: Economic and climatic consequences of pessimist assumptions on decoupling

    Warlenius RH. The limits to degrowth: Economic and climatic consequences of pessimist assumptions on decoupling. Ecological Economics. 2023;213:107937

    2023

  17. [17]

    A race between economic growth and carbon emissions: What play important roles towards global low-carbon development? Energy Economics

    Yang J, Hao Y, Feng C. A race between economic growth and carbon emissions: What play important roles towards global low-carbon development? Energy Economics. 2021;100:105327

    2021

  18. [18]

    How can green finance effectively promote low-carbon cities? Evidence from 237 cities in China

    Xu B, Lin B. How can green finance effectively promote low-carbon cities? Evidence from 237 cities in China. Journal of Environmental Management. 2024;365:121641

    2024

  19. [19]

    Quantifying the trends and affecting factors of CO2 emissions under different urban development patterns: An econometric study on the Yangtze river economic belt in China

    He X, Guan D, Yang X, Zhou L, Gao W. Quantifying the trends and affecting factors of CO2 emissions under different urban development patterns: An econometric study on the Yangtze river economic belt in China. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2024;107:105443

    2024

  20. [20]

    How does green finance drive the decarbonization of the 31 economy? Empirical evidence from China

    Lee C-C, Wang F, Lou R, Wang K. How does green finance drive the decarbonization of the 31 economy? Empirical evidence from China. Renewable Energy. 2023;204:671-84

    2023

  21. [21]

    Green finance development and resource efficiency: A financial structure perspective

    Yi H, Hao L, Liu A, Zhang Z. Green finance development and resource efficiency: A financial structure perspective. Resources Policy. 2023;85:104068

    2023

  22. [22]

    Green finance, climate change, and green innovation: Evidence from China

    Chen F, Zeng X, Guo X. Green finance, climate change, and green innovation: Evidence from China. Finance Research Letters. 2024;63:105283

    2024

  23. [23]

    Promoting low-carbon energy transition through green finance: New evidence from a demand-supply perspective

    Wang Y, Yuan Z, Luo H, Zeng H, Huang J, Li Y. Promoting low-carbon energy transition through green finance: New evidence from a demand-supply perspective. Energy Policy. 2024;195:114376

    2024

  24. [24]

    Impact of green finance incentive policies on China's carbon neutrality capability: An evaluation based on the difference-in-differences model

    Wang D, Sun Y. Impact of green finance incentive policies on China's carbon neutrality capability: An evaluation based on the difference-in-differences model. Finance Research Letters. 2025;77:107066

    2025

  25. [25]

    Can green credit policy improve environmental quality? Evidence from China

    Zhang K, Li Y, Qi Y, Shao S. Can green credit policy improve environmental quality? Evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Management. 2021;298:113445

    2021

  26. [26]

    Can green credit policy promote low-carbon technology innovation? Journal of Cleaner Production

    Chen Z, Zhang Y, Wang H, Ouyang X, Xie Y. Can green credit policy promote low-carbon technology innovation? Journal of Cleaner Production. 2022;359:132061

    2022

  27. [27]

    Effects of COVID-19 on green bonds, renewable power stocks, and carbon markets: A dynamic spillover analysis

    Zhang L, Baloch ZA, Niu G. Effects of COVID-19 on green bonds, renewable power stocks, and carbon markets: A dynamic spillover analysis. Renewable Energy. 2023;216:118900

    2023

  28. [28]

    Green credit policy and heavily polluting enterprises' green transition

    Lu H, Pan Y, Fan R, Guan W. Green credit policy and heavily polluting enterprises' green transition. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2025;103:104162

    2025

  29. [29]

    The interrelationship between the carbon market and the green bonds market: Evidence from wavelet quantile-on-quantile method

    Ren X, Li Y, yan C, Wen F, Lu Z. The interrelationship between the carbon market and the green bonds market: Evidence from wavelet quantile-on-quantile method. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2022;179:121611

    2022

  30. [30]

    An assessment on the new impetus of green energy development and its impact on climate change: a non-linear perspective

    Xu B, Xu R. An assessment on the new impetus of green energy development and its impact on climate change: a non-linear perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2024;31(25):36796-813

    2024

  31. [31]

    Decarbonization like China: How does green finance reform and innovation enhance carbon emission efficiency? Journal of Environmental Management

    Du M, Zhang J, Hou X. Decarbonization like China: How does green finance reform and innovation enhance carbon emission efficiency? Journal of Environmental Management. 2025;376:124331

    2025

  32. [32]

    Impact of green finance on China's pollution reduction and carbon efficiency: Based on the spatial panel model

    Li Y, Xu Y. Impact of green finance on China's pollution reduction and carbon efficiency: Based on the spatial panel model. International Review of Economics & Finance. 2024;94:103382

    2024

  33. [33]

    Unlocking sustainable futures: Exploring the non-linear linkages between green finance and environmental sustainability in developing countries

    Gul R, Hussain S. Unlocking sustainable futures: Exploring the non-linear linkages between green finance and environmental sustainability in developing countries. Journal of Environmental Management. 2024;370:122971

    2024

  34. [34]

    How does green finance reduce China's carbon emissions by fostering green technology innovation? Energy

    Huang J, He W, Dong X, Wang Q, Wu J. How does green finance reduce China's carbon emissions by fostering green technology innovation? Energy. 2024;298:131266

    2024

  35. [35]

    Impact of green finance on carbon emissions and spatial spillover effects: Empirical evidence from China

    Su X, Qiao R, Xu S. Impact of green finance on carbon emissions and spatial spillover effects: Empirical evidence from China. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2024;457:142362

    2024

  36. [36]

    Does green finance promote the transformation and upgrading of manufacturing enterprises? Empirical research based on micro survey data in China

    Wang M, Ma X. Does green finance promote the transformation and upgrading of manufacturing enterprises? Empirical research based on micro survey data in China. Finance Research Letters. 2024;69:106184

    2024

  37. [37]

    The effects of green finance on pollution and carbon reduction: Evidence from China’s industrial firms

    Fan L, Peng B, Lin Z, Zou H, Du H. The effects of green finance on pollution and carbon reduction: Evidence from China’s industrial firms. International Review of Economics & Finance. 2024;95:103490

    2024

  38. [38]

    Regional disparities and evolution trend of city-level carbon emission intensity in China

    Ke N, Lu X, Kuang B, Zhang X. Regional disparities and evolution trend of city-level carbon emission intensity in China. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2023;88:104288

    2023

  39. [39]

    Towards sustainable development: Can green digital finance become an accelerator for reducing pollution and carbon emissions in China? Sustainable Cities and 32 Society

    Yin Q, Huang Y, Ding C, Jing X. Towards sustainable development: Can green digital finance become an accelerator for reducing pollution and carbon emissions in China? Sustainable Cities and 32 Society. 2024;114:105722

    2024

  40. [40]

    Energy-environmental efficiency enhancement using green finance through spatio-temporal heterogeneity and dynamic regulatory mechanisms: Multiple perspectives study

    Zhang J, Sun Z. Energy-environmental efficiency enhancement using green finance through spatio-temporal heterogeneity and dynamic regulatory mechanisms: Multiple perspectives study. Renewable Energy. 2025;240:122212

    2025

  41. [41]

    Does green finance agglomeration improve carbon emission performance in China? A perspective of spatial spillover

    Zhang W, Liu X, Zhao S, Tang T. Does green finance agglomeration improve carbon emission performance in China? A perspective of spatial spillover. Applied Energy. 2024;358:122561

    2024

  42. [42]

    The impact of green finance and digital economy on regional carbon emission reduction

    Wang Y, Cui L, Zhou J. The impact of green finance and digital economy on regional carbon emission reduction. International Review of Economics & Finance. 2025;97:103748

    2025

  43. [43]

    Beyond carbon pricing: The role of banking and monetary policy in financing the transition to a low-carbon economy

    Campiglio E. Beyond carbon pricing: The role of banking and monetary policy in financing the transition to a low-carbon economy. Ecological Economics. 2016;121:220-30

    2016

  44. [44]

    A bibliometric analysis on green finance: Current status, development, and future directions

    Zhang D, Zhang Z, Managi S. A bibliometric analysis on green finance: Current status, development, and future directions. Finance Research Letters. 2019;29:425-30

    2019

  45. [45]

    Crossing the rivers by feeling the stones: The effect of China's green credit policy on manufacturing firms' carbon emission intensity

    Lee C-C, Chang Y-F, Wang E-Z. Crossing the rivers by feeling the stones: The effect of China's green credit policy on manufacturing firms' carbon emission intensity. Energy Economics. 2022;116:106413

    2022

  46. [46]

    Green credit and its obstacles: Evidence from China's green credit guidelines

    Huang Z, Gao N, Jia M. Green credit and its obstacles: Evidence from China's green credit guidelines. Journal of Corporate Finance. 2023;82:102441

    2023

  47. [47]

    Green credit policy and corporate access to bank loans in China: The role of environmental disclosure and green innovation

    Xing C, Zhang Y, Tripe D. Green credit policy and corporate access to bank loans in China: The role of environmental disclosure and green innovation. International Review of Financial Analysis. 2021;77:101838

    2021

  48. [48]

    Can Sustainable Investing Save the World? Reviewing the Mechanisms of Investor Impact

    Kölbel JF, Heeb F, Paetzold F, Busch T. Can Sustainable Investing Save the World? Reviewing the Mechanisms of Investor Impact. Organization & Environment. 2019;33:554 - 74

    2019

  49. [49]

    The Impact of Green Finance on Carbon Emission--Analysis Based on Mediation Effect and Spatial Effect

    Guo C-Q, Wang X, Cao D-D, Hou Y-G. The Impact of Green Finance on Carbon Emission--Analysis Based on Mediation Effect and Spatial Effect. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2022;Volume 10 - 2022

    2022

  50. [50]

    The impact of green finance on carbon emission intensity in China: mediating and spatial effects

    Liu X, Lu J, Zhou B. The impact of green finance on carbon emission intensity in China: mediating and spatial effects. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2025;Volume 12 - 2024

    2025

  51. [51]

    Do green technology innovations contribute to carbon dioxide emission reduction? Empirical evidence from patent data

    Du K, Li P, Yan Z. Do green technology innovations contribute to carbon dioxide emission reduction? Empirical evidence from patent data. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2019;146:297-303

    2019

  52. [52]

    Heterogeneous green innovations and carbon emission performance: Evidence at China's city level

    Xu L, Fan M, Yang L, Shao S. Heterogeneous green innovations and carbon emission performance: Evidence at China's city level. Energy Economics. 2021;99:105269

    2021

  53. [53]

    Green Finance, Industrial Structure Upgrading, and High-Quality Economic Development-Intermediation Model Based on the Regulatory Role of Environmental Regulation

    Xu S, Dong H. Green Finance, Industrial Structure Upgrading, and High-Quality Economic Development-Intermediation Model Based on the Regulatory Role of Environmental Regulation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(2)

    2023

  54. [54]

    The impact of green finance on the intensity and efficiency of carbon emissions: the moderating effect of the digital economy

    Liu W, Zhu P. The impact of green finance on the intensity and efficiency of carbon emissions: the moderating effect of the digital economy. Frontiers in Environmental Science. 2024;Volume 12 - 2024

    2024

  55. [55]

    Research on the impact of green finance on regional carbon emission reduction and its role mechanisms

    Li H, Yu Z, Chen G, Nie Y. Research on the impact of green finance on regional carbon emission reduction and its role mechanisms. Scientific Reports. 2025;15(1):17293

    2025

  56. [56]

    The impact of urban green business environment on FDI quality and its driving mechanism: Evidence from China

    Li X, Xiao L. The impact of urban green business environment on FDI quality and its driving mechanism: Evidence from China. World Development. 2024;175:106494

    2024

  57. [57]

    Environmental issues in policy-based competition for investment: A literature review

    Grey K, Brank D. Environmental issues in policy-based competition for investment: A literature review. Ecol Econ. 2002;11:71-81

    2002

  58. [58]

    Is Free Trade Good for the Environment? American Economic Review

    Antweiler W, Copeland BR, Taylor MS. Is Free Trade Good for the Environment? American Economic Review. 2001;91(4):877–908. 33

    2001

  59. [59]

    Trade, environmental regulations and industrial mobility: An industry-level study of Japan

    Cole MA, Elliott RJR, Okubo T. Trade, environmental regulations and industrial mobility: An industry-level study of Japan. Ecological Economics. 2010;69(10):1995-2002

    2010

  60. [60]

    The Role of Green Finance in Environmental Protection: Two Aspects of Market Mechanism and Policies

    Wang Y, Zhi Q. The Role of Green Finance in Environmental Protection: Two Aspects of Market Mechanism and Policies. Energy Procedia. 2016;104:311-6

    2016

  61. [61]

    Does green finance boost carbon–neutral performance? Evidence from China

    Hou H, Qu P, Zhang M. Does green finance boost carbon–neutral performance? Evidence from China. Environmental Science & Pollution Research. 2023;30(49)

    2023

  62. [62]

    The impact of green credit guidelines on environmental performance: Firm-level evidence from China

    Li C, Liu Z, Song R, Zhang Y-J. The impact of green credit guidelines on environmental performance: Firm-level evidence from China. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 2024;205:123524

    2024

  63. [63]

    Measuring Progress: Program Evaluation of Environmental Policies

    Bennear LS, and Coglianese C. Measuring Progress: Program Evaluation of Environmental Policies. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development. 2005;47(2):22-39

    2005

  64. [64]

    Banks, government Bonds, and Default: What do the data Say? Journal of Monetary Economics

    Gennaioli N, Martin A, Rossi S. Banks, government Bonds, and Default: What do the data Say? Journal of Monetary Economics. 2018;98:98-113

    2018

  65. [65]

    Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference

    Hansen BE. Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference. Journal of Econometrics. 1999;93(2):345-68

    1999

  66. [66]

    Path dependence, innovation and the economics of climate change

    Aghion P, Hepburn C, Teytelboym A, Zenghelis D. Path dependence, innovation and the economics of climate change. Handbook on Green Growth. 2014

    2014

  67. [67]

    Identification, Inference and Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Mediation Effects

    Imai K, Keele L, Yamamoto T. Identification, Inference and Sensitivity Analysis for Causal Mediation Effects. Statistical Science. 2010;25

    2010

  68. [68]

    Causal Mediation Analysis

    Hicks R, Tingley D. Causal Mediation Analysis. The Stata Journal. 2011;11(4):605-19

    2011

  69. [69]

    A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions

    Lundberg S, Lee S-I. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.07874 ed2017

    work page internal anchor Pith review Pith/arXiv arXiv

  70. [70]

    Mechanisms and tests for green finance to promote urban economic high quality development

    Liu H, He C. Mechanisms and tests for green finance to promote urban economic high quality development. Review of Investment Studies. 2021

    2021

  71. [71]

    Air Pollution ， Government Ｒ egulations and High-quality Economic Development

    Chen S, Chen D. Air Pollution ， Government Ｒ egulations and High-quality Economic Development. Economic Research Journal. 2018

    2018

  72. [72]

    Government environmental attention and enterprise greenwashing behavior: evidence from China

    Zheng X, Li W. Government environmental attention and enterprise greenwashing behavior: evidence from China. Journal of Asian Business and Economic Studies. 2024;31(5):392-403

    2024

  73. [73]

    Impact of China's environmental decentralization on carbon emissions from energy consumption: an empirical study based on the dynamic spatial econometric model

    Liu X, Yang X. Impact of China's environmental decentralization on carbon emissions from energy consumption: an empirical study based on the dynamic spatial econometric model. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022;29(48):72140-58

    2022

  74. [74]

    Impacts of government attention on achieving Sustainable Development Goals: Evidence from China

    Li C, Chen Z, Jiang Q, Yue M, Wu L, Bao Y, et al. Impacts of government attention on achieving Sustainable Development Goals: Evidence from China. Geography and Sustainability. 2025;6(2):100233

    2025

  75. [75]

    Research on the Environmental Effect of Green Finance Policy Based on the Analysis of Pilot Zones for Green Finance Reform and Innovations

    Huang H, Zhang J. Research on the Environmental Effect of Green Finance Policy Based on the Analysis of Pilot Zones for Green Finance Reform and Innovations. Sustainability. 2021;13(7):3754

    2021

  76. [76]

    Has the establishment of green finance reform and innovation pilot zones improved air quality? Evidence from China

    Xu X, Xie Y, Obobisa ES, Sun H. Has the establishment of green finance reform and innovation pilot zones improved air quality? Evidence from China. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications. 2023;10(1):262

    2023

  77. [77]

    Can green finance promote urban green development? Evidence from green finance reform and innovation pilot zone in China

    Zhang H, Wang Y, Li R, Si H, Liu W. Can green finance promote urban green development? Evidence from green finance reform and innovation pilot zone in China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research. 2023;30(5):12041-58

    2023

  78. [78]

    Do pilot zones for green finance reform and innovation promote energy savings? Evidence from China

    Zhang Z, Wang J, Feng C, Chen X. Do pilot zones for green finance reform and innovation promote energy savings? Evidence from China. Energy Economics. 2023;124:106763. 34

    2023

  79. [79]

    Can green finance policy promote inclusive green growth?- Based on the quasi-natural experiment of China's green finance reform and innovation pilot zone

    Xu A, Dai Y, Hu Z, Qiu K. Can green finance policy promote inclusive green growth?- Based on the quasi-natural experiment of China's green finance reform and innovation pilot zone. International Review of Economics & Finance. 2025;100:104090

    2025