Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 6 minor 124 references

Grand Design Spiral Arms in the Compact, Embedded Protoplanetary Disk of Haro 6-13

T0 review · 2 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Two faint spiral arms between roughly 10 and 35 au are detected in ALMA 1.3 mm images of the compact disk around Haro 6-13, and the paper argues that the low spectral index and high brightness temperatures indicate the disk may be…

desk verdict Plausible but not airtight spiral detection in a compact embedded disk; solid data and honest caveats, but the residual analysis needs a false-positive test and a flared-surface check. read the letter →

arxiv 2506.06433 v2 pith:WHLBW5XO submitted 2025-06-06 astro-ph.EP astro-ph.SR

Jane Huang , Masataka Aizawa , Jaehan Bae , Sean M. Andrews , Myriam Benisty , Edwin A. Bergin , Stefano Facchini , Christian Ginski
show 1 more author
Michael Küffmeier
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.EPastro-ph.SR
keywords Haro6-13protoplanetarydiskspiralarmsmillimetercontinuumopticaldepthgravitationalinstabilityALMAembedded
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper presents new ALMA 1.3 mm continuum observations at about 5 au resolution that reveal a pair of low-contrast spiral arms between roughly 10 and 35 au in the compact disk around the young star Haro 6-13, which had previously appeared smooth in lower-resolution images. The arms are approximated as Archimedean spirals with pitch angles ranging from about 10 to 30 degrees. Because the disk-averaged spectral index between 1.3 and 3 mm is 2.1 and the brightness temperatures are high, the paper argues that the millimeter continuum is optically thick and may hide enough mass for the disk to be gravitationally unstable and generate the arms itself. A surrounding envelope leaves open the alternative that infalling material is exciting the spirals. If correct, Haro 6-13 would be one of the smallest disks known to host millimeter spiral arms with no detected companion.

What carries the argument

The analysis pivots on a non-parametric visibility-modeling routine that assumes the disk is axisymmetric and geometrically thin, fits a Fourier-Bessel one-dimensional radial intensity profile to the ALMA visibilities, and subtracts that model. The residual visibilities are imaged, and a filament-finding algorithm traces the two residual arms; their sky coordinates are converted to disk polar coordinates and fitted to Archimedean spirals of the form $R(\theta) = a - b\theta$ with Gaussian-process regression to handle correlated pixel noise. The mass argument uses the disk-averaged spectral index between 229.5 and 97.5 GHz and the brightness temperature profile, compared with analytic passively irradiated dust temperatures, to estimate optical depths, dust surface densities, and Toomre $Q$ values.

What would settle it

Image the disk at 3 mm with a matched ~5 au beam and measure the spectral index radially inside 10-35 au; a resolved index above roughly 2.5 in that region would rule out the optically thick interpretation and remove the basis for the low Toomre Q estimates.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the compact disk around Haro 6-13 is not smooth: high-resolution ALMA continuum imaging resolves two faint spiral arms spanning roughly 10 to 35 au, approximately Archimedean in shape with pitch angles of about 10 to 30 degrees. The paper further claims that the low disk-averaged spectral index (alpha = 2.1) and high brightness temperatures indicate optically thick millimeter emission, which could hide enough dust mass to drive gravitational instability and thus self-generated spiral arms. The paper presents this as evidence that diverse substructures can exist in compact disks and that the apparent smoothness of Haro 6-13 in earlier observations was a resolution effect.

Load-bearing premise

The whole spiral detection rests on the assumption that the millimeter emission comes from a geometrically thin, coplanar disk; if the emission surface is flared or elevated, the thin-disk subtraction leaves antisymmetric residuals that can look like spirals.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the arms are genuine, Haro 6-13 joins the small set of disks with millimeter spiral arms and no detected companion, at a much smaller radius than the other cases.
  • The optically thick interpretation implies that millimeter flux alone underestimates the disk's mass reservoir, so the disk could be massive enough for gravitational instability despite appearing compact and faint.
  • The presence of envelope gas makes the infall scenario viable; in that case the spiral arms would trace external perturbation rather than self-gravity, and their 10-35 au extent would mean infall can stir the midplane at Solar-System scales.
  • The pitch-angle behavior of S2, which flattens with radius, matches the radial trend predicted by some gravitational-instability simulations, favoring that mechanism over models predicting constant pitch angles.
  • Searches for substructure in compact disks that assume axisymmetry can be misled: spiral arms may appear as gaps or rings when azimuthally averaged, as earlier visibility modeling and super-resolution imaging of Haro 6-13 suggested.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A decisive test available now is to image Haro 6-13 at 3 mm with a comparable ~5 au beam: if the radially resolved spectral index inside 10-35 au stays near 2.1, the opaque-disk interpretation is supported, whereas a rise above roughly 2.5 would weaken the gravitational-instability case.
  • The same residual-subtraction approach could be applied to other compact disks that appeared smooth in lower-resolution surveys; some may hide similarly low-contrast arms, implying that the prevalence of spiral arms in small disks has been underestimated.
  • If flared emission surfaces rather than true spirals are responsible for the residuals, the antisymmetric pattern predicted for a thin-model subtraction could be tested directly by fitting a vertically extended emission surface and seeing whether the S1/S2 asymmetry and central bar disappear.
  • The fact that at least three of the six companionless disks with millimeter spiral arms are embedded suggests that envelope-fed disks may be preferentially detected with this morphology, which would motivate a systematic survey of embedded compact disks.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper presents new ALMA 1.3 mm continuum observations of the T Tauri disk around Haro 6-13 at ~0.04'' (~5 au) resolution, combined with archival shorter-baseline data. The authors report a pair of low-contrast spiral arms spanning roughly 10-35 au, which they model as Archimedean spirals with pitch angles of ~10-30 degrees. They measure a disk-averaged spectral index of alpha = 2.1 between 1.3 and 3 mm and high brightness temperatures, interpreting the emission as likely optically thick and possibly hiding enough mass for gravitational instability. They also present CO isotopologue maps showing envelope emission. After discussing companion constraints, they argue that the spiral arms are unlikely to be due to stellar/planetary companions or flybys, and consider gravitational instability and infall as plausible origins. The paper places the result in the context of compact disks and argues that lower-resolution studies can miss such substructures.

Significance. The potential significance is substantial: if the spiral detection is robust, Haro 6-13 would be among the smallest disks with millimeter spiral arms and no known companion, with implications for gravitational instability in compact disks and for the interpretation of visibility-modeling and super-resolution studies that assume axisymmetry. The paper's strengths include the public release of visibilities and images, the use of a self-consistent axisymmetric visibility model (protomidpy) to isolate residuals, explicit discussion of alternative explanations, and an honest 'cautionary tale' section about the limitations of lower-resolution techniques. The central detection is plausible because faint spiral features are also visible in the original CLEAN image (Section 3.1), not solely in the residual map.

major comments (2)
  1. [3.2] The quantitative spiral geometry rests entirely on the residual map produced by subtracting a geometrically thin, axisymmetric protomidpy model from the observed visibilities. The manuscript itself (last paragraph of Section 3.2) cites Andrews et al. (2021) to note that for disks with elevated emission surfaces, subtracting a thin axisymmetric model leaves antisymmetric residuals on opposite sides of the major axis, and that this 'may contribute to the apparent difference in the extents of S2 and S1, as well as the bar-like residual near the disk center.' Haro 6-13 is a young embedded source with a detected envelope (Section 3.4), and S1 and S2 lie on opposite sides of the major axis (Figure 3). The paper does not test whether a plausible flared or vertically extended emission layer could produce the entire two-arm pattern, the measured pitch angles, or the central bar through this subtraction artifact. I request a forward-model test: inject an axisymmetric model with a parameterized vertical emission height (e.g., a Gaussian in z with a scale height consistent with the disk's temperature and turbulence) into the observed visibilities, run the same protomidpy subtraction and filfinder extraction, and quantify the incidence and morphology of spurious two-armed residuals. This test is essential to establish that the observed arm geometry is not an artifact of the thin-disk assumption.
  2. [3.2, filfinder thresholds] The spiral arm positions are extracted from the residual image using filfinder with thresholds that were chosen 'after some experimentation' (Section 3.2, paragraph 3). Because these thresholds are tuned on the same data that are used for the detection, and because the arms have low contrast (contrast < 1.5; Figure 5), the reported detection lacks a quantitative false-positive rate. The paper should provide a significance test, for example by running the identical protomidpy+filfinder pipeline on a large ensemble of noise realizations of the residual visibilities (or on residual images with the sign of the noise flipped), and by performing injection-recovery tests of synthetic spiral arms to calibrate the threshold choices. Without such a test, the reader cannot assess how likely it is that the two-arm pattern arises by chance.
minor comments (6)
  1. [3.2, last paragraph] The word 'opposide' should be 'opposite'.
  2. [2] The phrase 'employing auv-taper' should read 'employing a uv-taper'.
  3. [Figure 1 caption] The caption contains 'arbitary units' and should be 'arbitrary units'.
  4. [Author affiliations] There are typographical issues in the affiliations: 'F acchini' should be 'Facchini', and 'Knigstuhl' should be 'Königstuhl'.
  5. [4.1.1] The Toomre Q estimates rely on the assumed gas-to-dust ratio of 100 and the analytic temperature profile of Eq. (2); the body text notes the sensitivity, but the abstract's phrase 'may hide sufficient mass' should carry the same level of caution as the body.
  6. [4.3] The phrase 'it has been popular to explore' is informal; consider 'several studies have explored'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the spiral geometry is a direct fit to the data, the background subtraction is a standard tool with synthetic tests, and the Toomre Q and optical-depth estimates use independent inputs.

full rationale

The paper's central result—a two-armed spiral pattern at 10–35 au—is derived by subtracting a protomidpy axisymmetric model from the ALMA visibilities and then fitting Archimedean spirals to the residual positions (Section 3.2). This is parameter estimation from the data, not a prediction generated from an input that already contains the answer; the pitch angles are descriptive of the measured residuals. protomidpy is a peer-reviewed, public code (Aizawa et al. 2024) with synthetic-data tests; although an author of that code is a coauthor here, the detection is not justified by citing the code, and the paper explicitly flags the thin-disk assumption and its possible spurious-spiral residuals (citing Andrews et al. 2021) as a caveat rather than importing a conclusion. The Toomre Q analysis (Section 4.1.1) uses the observed brightness temperatures, an analytic dust-temperature formula (Eq. 2), assumed DSHARP opacities, and literature stellar parameters; it does not feed the spiral detection back in. The C18O mass bound uses an independent thermochemical grid. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors, and no known result is merely relabeled. The thin-disk and filfinder-threshold choices are physical and statistical systematics, not circular reductions.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central detection rests mostly on the fidelity of the residual imaging, and the gravitational-instability interpretation rests on a chain of assumed dust temperatures, opacities, and gas-to-dust ratio. The free parameters listed are the fitted spiral geometries and the hand-chosen extraction and optical-depth choices; no new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (4)
  • S1 Archimedean spiral amplitude a and slope b = a = 37.6 +/- 0.7 au, b = 7.2 +/- 0.3 au
    Fit to filfinder-extracted spiral positions (Table 4); the derived pitch-angle range is a direct consequence of these fitted values.
  • S2 Archimedean spiral amplitude a and slope b = a = 14.6 +/- 0.5 au, b = 6.4 +/- 0.2 au
    Fit to filfinder-extracted S2 positions; the pitch-angle decline with radius follows from these fitted values.
  • filfinder extraction thresholds = smoothing 2 px, intensity 0.03 mJy/beam, mask width 4 px, min size 300 au2, min length 3 beams
    Hand-chosen after some experimentation in Section 3.2; these choices determine which pixels become spiral detections, and no false-positive injection test is reported.
  • Inner-region optical depth cap = tau = 4 (assumed floor)
    Ad hoc cap used in the Toomre Q estimate in Section 4.1.1; it directly affects the inferred dust surface density and Q in the inner disk.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Millimeter emission is geometrically thin and co-planar with the disk midplane.
    protomidpy residual modeling assumes this in Section 3.2; if false, antisymmetric residuals from an elevated surface can mimic spiral arms, as the paper notes citing Andrews et al. (2021).
  • domain assumption Dust temperature follows the analytic passive-irradiation formula with flaring angle phi=0.02.
    Equation (2) in Sections 3.3 and 4.1.1 drives the brightness temperature and optical depth interpretation; the paper describes it as a crude estimate.
  • domain assumption Gas-to-dust ratio is 100 and gas is dynamically coupled to the inferred dust surface density.
    Section 4.1.1 uses gas-to-dust ratio 100 and dust surface density from tau/kappa to compute Q; different values move Q above or below the instability threshold.
  • domain assumption DSHARP dust opacity model with a power-law grain size distribution applies.
    Section 4.1.1 uses kappa_abs = 0.4, 1.9, and 1.0 cm2/g for amax = 0.1, 1, and 10 mm; if the opacities differ, the Q estimates shift.
  • domain assumption Stellar parameters M* = 0.91 Msun and L* = 0.79 Lsun from literature.
    Used for the Keplerian angular velocity and the analytic dust temperature; uncertainties in these values propagate into the Q and temperature estimates.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Grand Design Spiral Arms in the Compact, Embedded Protoplanetary Disk of Haro 6-13." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/WHLBW5XO

@misc{pith2026250606433,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Grand Design Spiral Arms in the Compact, Embedded Protoplanetary Disk of Haro 6-13},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/WHLBW5XO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2506.06433}
}
abstract

Millimeter continuum spiral arms have so far only been detected in a handful of protoplanetary disks, and thus we have a limited understanding of the circumstances in which they can form. In particular, substructures in small disks ($R\lessapprox 50$ au) have not been well-characterized in comparison with large disks. We present ALMA 1.3 mm continuum observations of the disk around the T Tauri star Haro 6-13 at a resolution of $\sim0.04''$ ($\sim5$ au). A pair of low-contrast spiral arms are detected at disk radii from $\sim10-35$ au. They can be approximated as Archimedean spirals with pitch angles ranging from $\sim10-30^\circ$. The low value of the disk-averaged spectral index between 1.3 and 3 mm ($\alpha=2.1$) and the high brightness temperatures suggest that the millimeter continuum is likely optically thick and thus may hide sufficient mass for the disk to become gravitationally unstable and form spiral arms. CO observations have shown that Haro 6-13 is surrounded by an envelope, raising the possibility that infall is facilitating spiral arm formation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2506.06433 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Left: 1.3 mm continuum image of Haro 6-13 and the corresponding intensity map as a function of radius and azimuthal angle in disk coordinates. An arcsinh stretch is used for the color scale. The synthesized beam is shown in the lower left corner of the CLEAN image. Right: The CLEAN image with an unsharp mask applied and the corresponding intensity map in R, θ coordinates [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Azimuthally averaged, deprojected radial profile of the 1.3 mm continuum image. The shaded ribbon shows the scatter in each radial bin divided by the square root of the number of synthesized beams spanning each bin. The inset shows the faint emission at larger radii. faint emission is visible out to R ≈ 70 au. Without azimuthal averaging, this emission only appears as scat￾tered 3σ peaks in the image, so it is not c… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Top left: 300 random I(r) samples from protomidpy modeling. Center left: CLEAN image of axisymmetric protomidpy model. Bottom left: Corresponding intensity plot in R and θ coordinates. Top right: Comparison of radial profiles calculated from CLEAN images of the observations and model. Center right: CLEAN image of the continuum residual visibilities created by subtracting the maximum a posteriori protomidpy model fro… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (5 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Top: Spiral arm positions identified by filfinder (orange and blue dots) and Archimedean spirals generated with 100 random draws of a and b from the posteriors (gray curves). Middle: Archimedean spirals generated with the posterior median values of a and b for each arm…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Left: Pitch angles as a function of radius for the spiral arm models. The bold, darker curves correspond to the Archimedean spirals with a and b set to the posterior median values, while the lighter, thin curves show 100 random draws from the posterior for each arm. Ri…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: A comparison of the observed brightness temper￾ature profile of the Haro 6-13 disk to the expected brightness temperatures from optically thick emission in the absence of scattering (i.e., saturation at the dust temperature) or opti￾cally thick emission with high scatt…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Left: Absorption-only estimate for the azimuthally averaged dust optical depth at 1.3 mm. τν is fixed to 4 in the inner region where the dust temperature is set to be equal to the brightness temperature. The vertical dashed gray lines denote the approximate radial rang…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

124 extracted references · 17 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    2024, MNRAS, 532, 1361, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1549

    Aizawa, M., Muto, T., & Momose, M. 2024, MNRAS, 532, 1361, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1549

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stae1549 2024

  2. [2]

    O., Girart, J

    Alves, F. O., Girart, J. M., Caselli, P., et al. 2017, A&A, 603, L3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201731077

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201731077 2017

  3. [3]

    W., & O’Neil, M

    Hogg, D. W., & O’Neil, M. 2015, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 38, 252, doi: 10.1109/TPAMI.2015.2448083

    arXiv 2015

  4. [4]

    M., Huang, J., P´ erez, L

    Andrews, S. M., Huang, J., P´ erez, L. M., et al. 2018, ApJL, 869, L41, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf741

    doi:10.3847/2041-8213/aaf741 2018

  5. [5]

    M., Elder, W., Zhang, S., et al

    Andrews, S. M., Elder, W., Zhang, S., et al. 2021, ApJ, 916, 51, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac00b9

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac00b9 2021

  6. [6]

    Artymowicz, P., & Lubow, S. H. 1994, ApJ, 421, 651, doi: 10.1086/173679 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Lim...

    doi:10.1086/173679 1994

  7. [7]

    2015, ApJ, 805, 15, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/15

    Bae, J., Hartmann, L., & Zhu, Z. 2015, ApJ, 805, 15, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/805/1/15

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/805/1/15 2015

  8. [8]

    Bae, J., Hartmann, L., Zhu, Z., & Nelson, R. P. 2014, ApJ, 795, 61, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/795/1/61

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/795/1/61 2014

Show all 124 references
  1. [9]

    2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Bae, J., Isella, A., Zhu, Z., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 423

    2023

  2. [10]

    2018a, ApJ, 859, 119, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabf93 —

    Bae, J., & Zhu, Z. 2018a, ApJ, 859, 119, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabf93 —. 2018b, ApJ, 859, 118, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aabf8c

    doi

  3. [11]

    2021, AJ, 161, 147, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abd806

    Demleitner, M., & Andrae, R. 2021, AJ, 161, 147, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abd806

    2021 doi

  4. [12]

    2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Benisty, M., Dominik, C., Follette, K., et al. 2023, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 534, Protostars and Planets VII, ed. S. Inutsuka, Y. Aikawa, T. Muto, K. Tomida, & M. Tamura, 605, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2203.09991

    2023 doi arXiv

  5. [13]

    2018, birnstiel/dsharp opac: revised release of package, v1.1.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1495277

    Birnstiel, T. 2018, birnstiel/dsharp opac: revised release of package, v1.1.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.1495277

    2018 doi

  6. [14]

    P., Zhu, Z., et al

    Birnstiel, T., Dullemond, C. P., Zhu, Z., et al. 2018, ApJL, 869, L45, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf743

    2018 doi

  7. [15]

    Boss, A. P. 1998, ApJ, 503, 923, doi: 10.1086/306036

    1998 doi

  8. [16]

    Papaloizou, J. C. B. 1999, ApJ, 514, 344, doi: 10.1086/306917

    1999 doi

  9. [17]

    2006, A&A, 452, 897, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054047 16Huang et al

    Cabrit, S., Pety, J., Pesenti, N., & Dougados, C. 2006, A&A, 452, 897, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054047 16Huang et al

    2006 doi

  10. [18]

    J., Hilder, T., et al

    Calcino, J., Price, D. J., Hilder, T., et al. 2025, MNRAS, 537, 2695, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staf135 Carrasco-Gonz´ alez, C., Sierra, A., Flock, M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 883, 71, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3d33 CASA Team, Bean, B., Bhatnagar, S., et al. 2022, PASP, 134, 114501, doi: 10...

    2025 doi

  11. [19]

    Chen, E., Yu, S.-Y., & Ho, L. C. 2021, ApJ, 906, 19, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc7c5

    2021 doi

  12. [20]

    2014, ApJL, 785, L12, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/785/1/L12

    Christiaens, V., Casassus, S., Perez, S., van der Plas, G., & M´ enard, F. 2014, ApJL, 785, L12, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/785/1/L12

    2014 doi

  13. [21]

    A., Gonz´ alez-Ruilova, C., Hales, A

    Cieza, L. A., Gonz´ alez-Ruilova, C., Hales, A. S., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 501, 2934, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa3787

    2021 doi

  14. [22]

    J., & Pringle, J

    Clarke, C. J., & Pringle, J. E. 1993, MNRAS, 261, 190, doi: 10.1093/mnras/261.1.190

    1993 doi

  15. [23]

    I., ¨Oberg, K

    Cleeves, L. I., ¨Oberg, K. I., Wilner, D. J., et al. 2016, ApJ, 832, 110, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/832/2/110

    2016 doi

  16. [24]

    S., Reipurth, B., & Tokunaga, A

    Connelley, M. S., Reipurth, B., & Tokunaga, A. T. 2008, AJ, 135, 2496, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/135/6/2496

    2008 doi

  17. [25]

    Cornwell, T. J. 2008, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2, 793, doi: 10.1109/JSTSP.2008.2006388

    2008

  18. [26]

    Cossins, P., Lodato, G., & Clarke, C. J. 2009, MNRAS, 393, 1157, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.14275.x

    2009

  19. [27]

    2019, MNRAS, 483, 4114, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3325

    Cuello, N., Dipierro, G., Mentiplay, D., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 483, 4114, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty3325

    2019 doi

  20. [28]

    2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 751, doi: 10.1038/s41550-022-01634-x

    Currie, T., Lawson, K., Schneider, G., et al. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 751, doi: 10.1038/s41550-022-01634-x

    2022 doi

  21. [29]

    2021, MPoL-dev/visread, v0.0.1, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4432501

    Rosenfeld, K. 2021, MPoL-dev/visread, v0.0.1, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.4432501

    2021 doi

  22. [30]

    K., Anglada, G., Bl´ azquez-Calero, G., et al

    Diaz-Rodriguez, A. K., Anglada, G., Bl´ azquez-Calero, G., et al. 2022, ApJ, 930, 91, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac3b50

    2022 doi

  23. [31]

    2016, ApJ, 816, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/816/1/L12

    Dong, R., Zhu, Z., Fung, J., et al. 2016, ApJ, 816, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/816/1/L12

    2016 doi

  24. [32]

    2018, ApJ, 860, 124, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac6cb

    Dong, R., Liu, S.-y., Eisner, J., et al. 2018, ApJ, 860, 124, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac6cb

    2018 doi

  25. [33]

    B., Cuello, N., et al

    Dong, R., Liu, H. B., Cuello, N., et al. 2022, Nature Astronomy, 6, 331, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2201.0561710. 1038/s41550-021-01558-y

    2022 doi arXiv

  26. [34]

    P., K¨ uffmeier, M., Goicovic, F., et al

    Dullemond, C. P., K¨ uffmeier, M., Goicovic, F., et al. 2019, A&A, 628, A20, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201832632

    2019 doi

  27. [35]

    P., Birnstiel, T., Huang, J., et al

    Dullemond, C. P., Birnstiel, T., Huang, J., et al. 2018, ApJL, 869, L46, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf742

    2018 doi

  28. [36]

    F., Manara, C

    Facchini, S., van Dishoeck, E. F., Manara, C. F., et al. 2019, A&A, 626, L2, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201935496

    2019 doi

  29. [37]

    M., & Kraus, A

    Fitton, S., Tofflemire, B. M., & Kraus, A. L. 2022, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 6, 18, doi: 10.3847/2515-5172/ac4bb7

    2022 doi

  30. [38]

    W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Hogg, D. W., Lang, D., & Goodman, J. 2013, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 125, 306, doi: 10.1086/670067

    2013 doi

  31. [39]

    H., Ilee, J

    Forgan, D. H., Ilee, J. D., & Meru, F. 2018, ApJ, 860, L5, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aac7c9

    2018 doi

  32. [40]

    2004, ApJL, 605, L53, doi: 10.1086/420699 Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A

    Fukagawa, M., Hayashi, M., Tamura, M., et al. 2004, ApJL, 605, L53, doi: 10.1086/420699 Gaia Collaboration, Brown, A. G. A., Vallenari, A., et al. 2021, A&A, 649, A1, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039657 Gaia Collaboration, Vallenari, A., Brown, A. G. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A1...

    2004 doi

  33. [41]

    2018, A&A, 620, A94, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833872

    Garufi, A., Benisty, M., Pinilla, P., et al. 2018, A&A, 620, A94, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201833872

    2018 doi

  34. [42]

    2021, A&A, 645, A145, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039483 —

    Garufi, A., Podio, L., Codella, C., et al. 2021, A&A, 645, A145, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039483 —. 2022, A&A, 658, A104, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141264

    2021 doi

  35. [43]

    2021, ApJL, 908, L25, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abdf57

    Ginski, C., Facchini, S., Huang, J., et al. 2021, ApJL, 908, L25, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abdf57

    2021 doi

  36. [44]

    M., van der Marel, N., Williams, J

    Guerra-Alvarado, O. M., van der Marel, N., Williams, J. P., et al. 2025, A&A, 696, A232, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202453338

    2025 doi

  37. [45]

    P., Barsony, M., & Stahler, S

    Haisch, Karl E., J., Greene, T. P., Barsony, M., & Stahler, S. W. 2004, AJ, 127, 1747, doi: 10.1086/381952

    2004 doi

  38. [46]

    J., et al

    Hammond, I., Christiaens, V., Price, D. J., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 522, L51, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slad027

    2023 doi

  39. [47]

    E., Looney, L

    Harrison, R. E., Looney, L. W., Stephens, I. W., et al. 2019, ApJL, 877, L2, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1e46

    2019 doi

  40. [48]

    D., & Levin, Y

    Harsono, D., Alexander, R. D., & Levin, Y. 2011, MNRAS, 413, 423, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18146.x

    2011

  41. [49]

    2020, ApJ, 895, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab70ba

    Hendler, N., Pascucci, I., Pinilla, P., et al. 2020, ApJ, 895, 126, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab70ba

    2020 doi

  42. [50]

    2017, A&A, 599, A86, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629779

    Hennebelle, P., Lesur, G., & Fromang, S. 2017, A&A, 599, A86, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629779

    2017 doi

  43. [51]

    J., & Hillenbrand, L

    Herczeg, G. J., & Hillenbrand, L. A. 2014, ApJ, 786, 97, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/786/2/97

    2014 doi

  44. [52]

    2024, ApJ, 976, 132, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad84df

    Huang, J., Ansdell, M., Birnstiel, T., et al. 2024, ApJ, 976, 132, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad84df

    2024 doi

  45. [53]

    M., Dullemond, C

    Huang, J., Andrews, S. M., Dullemond, C. P., et al. 2018a, ApJL, 869, L42, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf740

    doi

  46. [54]

    M., P´ erez, L

    Huang, J., Andrews, S. M., P´ erez, L. M., et al. 2018b, ApJL, 869, L43, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf7a0

    doi

  47. [55]

    A., ¨Oberg, K

    Huang, J., Bergin, E. A., ¨Oberg, K. I., et al. 2021, ApJS, 257, 19, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac143e

    2021 doi

  48. [56]

    Hunter, J. D. 2007, Computing in Science & Engineering, 9, 90, doi: 10.1109/MCSE.2007.55

    2007 doi

  49. [57]

    2023, analysisUtils, 2.6, Zenodo, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7502160 Spiral arms in Haro 6-1317

    Indebetouw, R. 2023, analysisUtils, 2.6, Zenodo, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7502160 Spiral arms in Haro 6-1317

    2023 doi

  50. [58]

    F., Facchini, S., Rosotti, G

    Izquierdo, A. F., Facchini, S., Rosotti, G. P., van Dishoeck, E. F., & Testi, L. 2022, ApJ, 928, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac474d

    2022 doi

  51. [59]

    Rosotti, G. P. 2022, MNRAS, 509, 2780, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3185

    2022 doi

  52. [60]

    Clarke, C. J. 2020, MNRAS, 495, 3209, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa1365

    2020 doi

  53. [61]

    2009, ApJ, 697, 1269, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1269

    Johansen, A., Youdin, A., & Klahr, H. 2009, ApJ, 697, 1269, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1269

    2009 doi

  54. [62]

    J., & Hartmann, L

    Kenyon, S. J., & Hartmann, L. 1995, ApJS, 101, 117, doi: 10.1086/192235

    1995 doi

  55. [63]

    A., Tsutsumi, T., Brogan, C

    Kepley, A. A., Tsutsumi, T., Brogan, C. L., et al. 2020, PASP, 132, 024505, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/ab5e14

    2020 doi

  56. [64]

    W., & Rosolowsky, E

    Koch, E. W., & Rosolowsky, E. W. 2015, MNRAS, 452, 3435, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv1521 —. 2016, FilFinder: Filamentary structure in molecular clouds, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1608.009

    2015 doi

  57. [65]

    2016, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 54, 271, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023307

    Kratter, K., & Lodato, G. 2016, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 54, 271, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081915-023307

    2016 doi

  58. [66]

    L., & Hillenbrand, L

    Kraus, A. L., & Hillenbrand, L. A. 2007, ApJ, 662, 413, doi: 10.1086/516835

    2007 doi

  59. [67]

    S., & Haugbølle, T

    Kuffmeier, M., Frimann, S., Jensen, S. S., & Haugbølle, T. 2018, MNRAS, 475, 2642, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty024

    2018 doi

  60. [68]

    S., & Haugbølle, T

    Kuffmeier, M., Jensen, S. S., & Haugbølle, T. 2023, European Physical Journal Plus, 138, 272, doi: 10.1140/epjp/s13360-023-03880-y

    2023 doi

  61. [69]

    T., P´ erez, L

    Kurtovic, N. T., P´ erez, L. M., Benisty, M., et al. 2018, ApJL, 869, L44, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaf746

    2018 doi

  62. [70]

    Kuznetsova, A., Bae, J., Hartmann, L., & Low, M.-M. M. 2022, ApJ, 928, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac54a8

    2022 doi

  63. [71]

    W., Mundy, L

    Kwon, W., Looney, L. W., Mundy, L. G., & Welch, W. J. 2015, ApJ, 808, 102, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/808/1/102

    2015 doi

  64. [72]

    Lee, C.-F., Li, Z.-Y., & Turner, N. J. 2020, Nature Astronomy, 4, 142, doi: 10.1038/s41550-019-0905-x

    2020 doi

  65. [73]

    2015, A&A, 582, L9, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526734

    Lesur, G., Hennebelle, P., & Fromang, S. 2015, A&A, 582, L9, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526734

    2015 doi

  66. [74]

    Lin, D. N. C., & Papaloizou, J. 1986, ApJ, 307, 395, doi: 10.1086/164426

    1986 doi

  67. [75]

    Liu, H. B. 2019, ApJ, 877, L22, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1f8e

    2019 doi

  68. [76]

    B., Takami, M., Kudo, T., et al

    Liu, H. B., Takami, M., Kudo, T., et al. 2016, Science Advances, 2, e1500875, doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1500875

    2016 doi

  69. [77]

    Lodato, G., & Rice, W. K. M. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 630, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07811.x

    2004

  70. [78]

    2023, MNRAS, 518, 4481, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3223

    Lodato, G., Rampinelli, L., Viscardi, E., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 518, 4481, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3223

    2023 doi

  71. [79]

    J., et al

    Long, F., Pinilla, P., Herczeg, G. J., et al. 2018, ApJ, 869, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aae8e1

    2018 doi

  72. [80]

    J., Harsono, D., et al

    Long, F., Herczeg, G. J., Harsono, D., et al. 2019, ApJ, 882, 49, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab2d2d

    2019 doi

  73. [81]

    Longarini, C., Lodato, G., Bertin, G., & Armitage, P. J. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 2017, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3653

    2023 doi

  74. [82]

    2010, ApJS, 186, 111, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/186/1/111 Mac ´ ıas, E., Guerra-Alvarado, O., Carrasco-Gonz´ alez, C., et al

    Calvet, N. 2010, ApJS, 186, 111, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/186/1/111 Mac ´ ıas, E., Guerra-Alvarado, O., Carrasco-Gonz´ alez, C., et al. 2021, A&A, 648, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039812

    2010 doi

  75. [83]

    F., Morbidelli, A., & Guillot, T

    Manara, C. F., Morbidelli, A., & Guillot, T. 2018, A&A, 618, L3, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834076

    2018 doi

  76. [84]

    2004, ApJ, 609, 1045, doi: 10.1086/421288

    Mayer, L., Quinn, T., Wadsley, J., & Stadel, J. 2004, ApJ, 609, 1045, doi: 10.1086/421288

    2004 doi

  77. [85]

    D., et al

    Meru, F., Juh´ asz, A., Ilee, J. D., et al. 2017, ApJ, 839, L24, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa6837

    2017 doi

  78. [86]

    2022, A&A, 658, A63, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142219

    Mesa, D., Ginski, C., Gratton, R., et al. 2022, A&A, 658, A63, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142219

    2022 doi

  79. [87]

    M., Carpenter, J., Booth, R., et al

    Miley, J. M., Carpenter, J., Booth, R., et al. 2024, A&A, 682, A55, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347135

    2024 doi

  80. [88]

    2021, A&A, 651, A48, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140550

    Miotello, A., Rosotti, G., Ansdell, M., et al. 2021, A&A, 651, A48, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140550

    2021 doi

  81. [89]

    A., Hashimoto, J., et al

    Muto, T., Grady, C. A., Hashimoto, J., et al. 2012, ApJL, 748, L22, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/748/2/L22

    2012 doi

  82. [90]

    R., & Kenyon, S

    Najita, J. R., & Kenyon, S. J. 2014, MNRAS, 445, 3315, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1994

    2014 doi

  83. [91]

    J., Jørgensen, J

    Ohashi, N., Tobin, J. J., Jørgensen, J. K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 951, 8, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd384 Paneque-Carre˜ no, T., P´ erez, L. M., Benisty, M., et al. 2021, ApJ, 914, 88, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abf243 P´ erez, L. M., Carpenter, J. M., Andrews, S. M., et al. 2016, Scien...

    2023 doi

  84. [92]

    P., & Tabone, B

    Pizzati, E., Rosotti, G. P., & Tabone, B. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 3184, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2057

    2023 doi

  85. [93]

    P., Amara, A., Meyer, M

    Quanz, S. P., Amara, A., Meyer, M. R., et al. 2013, ApJL, 766, L1, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/766/1/L1

    2013 doi

  86. [94]

    M., Padgett, D

    Rebull, L. M., Padgett, D. L., McCabe, C. E., et al. 2010, ApJS, 186, 259, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/186/2/259 Ribas, ´A., Mac ´ ıas, E., Weber, P., et al. 2023, A&A, 673, A77, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245637

    2010 doi

  87. [95]

    2012, A&A, 540, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118296

    Ricci, L., Trotta, F., Testi, L., et al. 2012, A&A, 540, A6, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201118296

    2012 doi

  88. [96]

    P., Benisty, M., Juh´ asz, A., et al

    Rosotti, G. P., Benisty, M., Juh´ asz, A., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 1335, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3090

    2020 doi

  89. [97]

    2024, MNRAS, 528, 2490, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae167

    Rowther, S., Nealon, R., Meru, F., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 2490, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae167

    2024 doi

  90. [98]

    J., et al

    Shi, Y., Long, F., Herczeg, G. J., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 59, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2e94 18Huang et al

    2024 doi

  91. [99]

    F., Dutkevitch, D., Strom, S

    Skrutskie, M. F., Dutkevitch, D., Strom, S. E., et al. 1990, AJ, 99, 1187, doi: 10.1086/115407

    1990 doi

  92. [100]

    2024, Nature, 633, 58, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07877-0

    Speedie, J., Dong, R., Hall, C., et al. 2024, Nature, 633, 58, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07877-0

    2024 doi

  93. [101]

    2014, ApJ, 796, 1, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/796/1/1

    Takakuwa, S., Saito, M., Saigo, K., et al. 2014, ApJ, 796, 1, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/796/1/1

    2014 doi

  94. [102]

    2020, ApJ, 898, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9b7c

    Takakuwa, S., Saigo, K., Matsumoto, T., et al. 2020, ApJ, 898, 10, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9b7c

    2020 doi

  95. [103]

    Tanaka, H., Takeuchi, T., & Ward, W. R. 2002, ApJ, 565, 1257, doi: 10.1086/324713

    2002 doi

  96. [104]

    2017, ApJ, 840, 32, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6af7

    Tang, Y.-W., Guilloteau, S., Dutrey, A., et al. 2017, ApJ, 840, 32, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6af7

    2017 doi

  97. [105]

    J., Kratter, K

    Tobin, J. J., Kratter, K. M., Persson, M. V., et al. 2016, Nature, 538, 483, doi: 10.1038/nature20094

    2016 doi

  98. [106]

    1964, ApJ, 139, 1217, doi: 10.1086/147861

    Toomre, A. 1964, ApJ, 139, 1217, doi: 10.1086/147861

    1964 doi

  99. [107]

    2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 1148, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02308-6 van der Velden, E

    Sudarshan, P. 2024, Nature Astronomy, 8, 1148, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02308-6 van der Velden, E. 2020, Journal of Open Source Software, 5, 2004, doi: 10.21105/joss.02004 van der Walt, S., Sch¨ onberger, J. L., Nunez-Iglesias, J., et al. 2014, PeerJ, 2, e453, doi: 10.7717/peer...

    2024 doi

  100. [108]

    2021, A&A, 653, A159, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141591

    Godard, B. 2021, A&A, 653, A159, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141591

    2021 doi

  101. [109]

    J., Price, D

    Verrios, H. J., Price, D. J., Pinte, C., Hilder, T., & Calcino, J. 2022, ApJL, 934, L11, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac7f44

    2022 doi

  102. [110]

    R., Duchˆ ene, G., et al

    Villenave, M., Stapelfeldt, K. R., Duchˆ ene, G., et al. 2022, ApJ, 930, 11, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5fae

    2022 doi

  103. [111]

    2023, ApJ, 946, 70, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb92e

    Villenave, M., Podio, L., Duchˆ ene, G., et al. 2023, ApJ, 946, 70, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb92e

    2023 doi

  104. [112]

    E., et al

    Virtanen, P., Gommers, R., Oliphant, T. E., et al. 2020, Nature Methods, 17, 261, doi: 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2

    2020 doi

  105. [113]

    2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 1208, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-02028-3

    Wagner, K., Stone, J., Skemer, A., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 1208, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-02028-3

    2023 doi

  106. [114]

    L., Kammerer, J., Ireland, M

    Wallace, A. L., Kammerer, J., Ireland, M. J., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 498, 1382, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa2434

    2020 doi

  107. [115]

    J., Benisty, M., & Andrews, S

    Winter, A. J., Benisty, M., & Andrews, S. M. 2024, ApJL, 972, L9, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad6d5d

    2024 doi

  108. [116]

    Xu, W., Ohashi, S., Aso, Y., & Liu, H. B. 2023, ApJ, 954, 190, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aced4c

    2023 doi

  109. [117]

    2024, PASJ, 76, 437, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psae022

    Yamaguchi, M., Muto, T., Tsukagoshi, T., et al. 2024, PASJ, 76, 437, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psae022

    2024 doi

  110. [118]

    A., Rodr ´ ıguez, L

    Zapata, L. A., Rodr ´ ıguez, L. F., Fern´ andez-L´ opez, M., et al. 2020, ApJ, 896, 132, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8fac

    2020 doi

  111. [119]

    A., et al

    Zawadzki, B., Czekala, I., Loomis, R. A., et al. 2023, PASP, 135, 064503, doi: 10.1088/1538-3873/acdf84

    2023 doi

  112. [120]

    A., Blake, G

    Zhang, K., Bergin, E. A., Blake, G. A., et al. 2016, ApJL, 818, L16, doi: 10.3847/2041-8205/818/1/L16

    2016 doi

  113. [121]

    2023, ApJ, 952, 108, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd334

    Zhang, S., Kalscheur, M., Long, F., et al. 2023, ApJ, 952, 108, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd334

    2023 doi

  114. [122]

    2010, ApJ, 713, 1143, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/713/2/1143

    Zhu, Z., Hartmann, L., & Gammie, C. 2010, ApJ, 713, 1143, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/713/2/1143

    2010 doi

  115. [123]

    2019, ApJL, 877, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1f8c

    Zhu, Z., Zhang, S., Jiang, Y.-F., et al. 2019, ApJL, 877, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1f8c

    2019 doi

  116. [124]

    M., Baranec, C., et al

    Ziegler, C., Law, N. M., Baranec, C., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 259, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aad80a

    2018 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.