pith. sign in

arxiv: 2606.27115 · v1 · pith:WI6UFIAPnew · submitted 2026-06-25 · 🌌 astro-ph.CO

Clustering of high-redshift quasars with DESI DR2

M. Charles , P. Martini , A. J. Ross , D. H. Weinberg , J. Aguilar , S. Ahlen , D. Bianchi , D. Brooks
show 41 more authors
F. J. Castander T. Claybaugh A. Cuceu A. de la Macorra P. Doel S. Ferraro A. Font-Ribera J. E. Forero-Romero S. Gontcho A Gontcho G. Gutierrez J. Guy C. Hahn H. K. Herrera-Alcantar K. Honscheid C. Howlett M. Ishak R. Joyce D. Kirkby A. Kremin M. Landriau L. Le Guillou M. E. Levi M. Manera A. Meisner R. Miquel J. Moustakas A. D. Myers S. Nadathur N. Palanque-Delabrouille W. J. Percival F. Prada I. P\'erez-R\`afols G. Rossi L. Samushia E. Sanchez D. Schlegel M. Schubnell D. Sprayberry G. Tarl\'e B. A. Weaver R. Zhou
This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-06-26 03:58 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🌌 astro-ph.CO
keywords quasar clusteringbias evolutionhalo masshigh-redshift quasarsluminosity dependenceduty cycle
0
0 comments X

The pith

Quasar bias evolves with redshift in a way that implies a constant characteristic halo mass of roughly 10^12 solar masses from z=2 to 3.5.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper uses a large sample of high-redshift quasars to measure how their spatial clustering changes with redshift and luminosity. It finds that the measured bias follows a specific redshift dependence that matches what is expected if the typical host halo mass stays fixed near 10^12 solar masses. The same data show only a weak increase of bias with quasar luminosity at fixed redshift, which is statistically detectable but smaller than some models predict. These results constrain the typical active lifetime of the quasars and the link between black hole activity and halo properties.

Core claim

The redshift evolution of quasar bias is well fit by b_Q(z) = a[(1+z)^2 - 6.565] + b with a=0.230 and b=2.394, corresponding to a characteristic halo mass near 10^12 solar masses that shows little change over 2<z<3.5. Dividing the sample by luminosity reveals a weak but statistically significant dependence of bias on luminosity at fixed redshift that is inconsistent with zero dependence yet weaker than expected from models with tight luminosity-halo mass correlation.

What carries the argument

The quasar bias b_Q extracted from the two-point clustering statistics of the sample, which is then mapped to halo mass using a standard bias-to-mass relation.

If this is right

  • The typical active lifetime of these quasars is roughly one percent of the available time and stays roughly constant across the redshift range.
  • Models in which quasar luminosity is a tight function of halo mass are inconsistent with the observed weak luminosity dependence of bias.
  • The black hole-halo connection at high redshift must allow for substantial scatter between instantaneous luminosity and host halo mass.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If halo mass is truly fixed while the universe expands, the typical quasar host must accrete mass at a rate that offsets cosmic expansion over this interval.
  • The weak luminosity dependence suggests that feedback or accretion-rate variations dominate over halo mass in setting observed quasar brightness.
  • Extending the same analysis to lower or higher redshifts could test whether the constant-mass regime ends outside z=2-3.5.

Load-bearing premise

The conversion from the observed bias value to a specific halo mass assumes that the chosen halo bias model remains accurate at these redshifts and luminosities.

What would settle it

A measurement of average halo mass through gravitational lensing or satellite kinematics that shows clear change with redshift between 2 and 3.5 would contradict the constant-mass interpretation.

read the original abstract

We present clustering measurements for high-redshift quasars using data from the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument Data Release 2. Our sample consists of quasars with $2.0 < z < 3.5$ in the luminosity range $M_{1450} \leq -19.94$\,mag. We measure the mean quasar bias $b_Q(\bar{z} = 2.48) = 3.61 \pm 0.01$ for the full sample of $\sim 715,000$ quasars and quantify the redshift evolution of quasar bias by dividing the sample into four equal redshift bins. There is strong evolution of the quasar bias with redshift that is well fit by the function $b_Q(z) = a [(1 + z)^2 - 6.565] + b$ with $a=0.230 \pm 0.007$ and $b=2.394 \pm 0.035$, and this fit is also a good match to lower redshift measurements in the literature. This bias evolution is consistent with a characteristic halo mass of $\bar{M}_{\mathrm{h}} \sim 10^{12}\,\mathrm{M_\odot}$ that does not vary significantly with redshift. The inferred duty cycles for quasars in our sample are $f_{\mathrm{duty}} \sim 10^{-2}$, staying mostly constant over redshifts. We investigate the luminosity dependence of quasar clustering by dividing each of our four redshift bins into three luminosity bins. The size of our quasar sample permits the first statistically significant measurement of the luminosity dependence of quasar bias at these redshifts. We measure weak dependence of quasar bias on luminosity at fixed redshift, inconsistent with no dependence, but weaker than predicted by a model in which quasar luminosity is tightly correlated with halo mass. These clustering measurements provide a stringent test for models of active black hole light curves and the black hole-halo connection at high redshift.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

1 major / 2 minor

Summary. The paper claims that clustering measurements from ~715,000 DESI DR2 quasars at 2.0 < z < 3.5 yield a mean bias b_Q(z=2.48) = 3.61 ± 0.01, with redshift evolution well described by b_Q(z) = a[(1+z)^2 - 6.565] + b (a=0.230±0.007, b=2.394±0.035) that matches lower-z literature and implies a redshift-independent characteristic halo mass ~10^12 M_⊙. Duty cycles are inferred at ~10^{-2} and roughly constant. Dividing into luminosity bins within each redshift bin permits the first statistically significant measurement of weak luminosity dependence of bias at fixed z (inconsistent with zero dependence but weaker than expected from tight L-M_h correlation models), providing a test of black hole light-curve and halo-connection models.

Significance. If the results hold, the large sample enables the first significant luminosity-dependence measurement at these redshifts, offering direct constraints on the black hole-halo connection and active galactic nucleus light curves. The explicit functional fit to bias evolution and its consistency with lower-redshift data are strengths. The work supplies a large, publicly usable dataset of high-z quasar clustering measurements.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section discussing conversion from measured bias to halo mass and duty cycle (near the paragraph stating M_h-bar ~ 10^{1] The inference that bias evolution implies a redshift-independent characteristic halo mass of ~10^{12} M_⊙ (and the subsequent claim that the observed weak luminosity trend is weaker than predicted by tight L-M_h models) rests on the accuracy of the adopted halo bias function at 2 < z < 3.5 for M_h ~ 10^{12} M_⊙. No validation against high-redshift simulations or alternative bias models is provided in the relevant section; this assumption is load-bearing for both central conclusions.
minor comments (2)
  1. [Methods / sample selection] The abstract states the luminosity range as M_1450 ≤ -19.94 mag; the methods section should explicitly state the precise selection cuts, completeness corrections, and any redshift-dependent adjustments applied to this threshold.
  2. [Clustering measurement and error analysis] Ensure that the reported covariance matrices or error estimation procedure for the bias measurements (used in the four redshift bins and luminosity sub-bins) is described with sufficient detail to allow reproduction, including any impact of redshift success rate.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

1 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful reading of the manuscript and for identifying a key point regarding the robustness of our halo-mass inferences. We address the comment below and will incorporate the requested validation in the revised version.

read point-by-point responses

  1. Referee: The inference that bias evolution implies a redshift-independent characteristic halo mass of ~10^{12} M_⊙ (and the subsequent claim that the observed weak luminosity trend is weaker than predicted by tight L-M_h models) rests on the accuracy of the adopted halo bias function at 2 < z < 3.5 for M_h ~ 10^{12} M_⊙. No validation against high-redshift simulations or alternative bias models is provided in the relevant section; this assumption is load-bearing for both central conclusions.

    Authors: We agree that the mapping from measured bias to halo mass is central to our conclusions on redshift-independent M_h and the interpretation of the luminosity dependence. Our analysis adopts the Tinker et al. (2010) fitting function, which is the standard choice in the recent quasar clustering literature at these redshifts. To directly address the concern, we will add a dedicated paragraph (and accompanying figure) in the halo-mass section that (i) compares the Tinker prediction for M_h = 10^{12} M_⊙ at 2 < z < 3.5 against bias measurements extracted from high-redshift N-body simulations (Bolshoi-Planck and MultiDark), and (ii) repeats the constant-M_h fit using the Sheth-Tormen (1999) model as an alternative. We will also propagate the small differences between models into the quoted uncertainty on the duty cycle and on the significance of the luminosity trend. These additions will be included in the revised manuscript. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

Direct observational measurements with no circular derivations

full rationale

The paper reports direct measurements of quasar bias b_Q from the DESI DR2 clustering data for ~715k quasars at 2<z<3.5. The redshift evolution is parametrized by fitting the empirical form b_Q(z) = a[(1+z)^2 - 6.565] + b to the binned measurements, yielding a and b from the data. The inference of roughly constant characteristic halo mass ~10^12 M_sun uses an external halo bias function (Tinker et al.) applied to the measured b_Q(z); this is an assumption about the mapping, not a self-definition or self-citation that reduces the result to the inputs. Luminosity dependence is measured by subdividing the sample into luminosity bins and comparing the resulting b_Q values, which is a direct data comparison. No steps match the enumerated circularity patterns: no self-definitional relations, no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, no load-bearing self-citations, and no ansatz or uniqueness imported from prior author work. The central claims (weak luminosity dependence, consistency with constant halo mass) are falsifiable against the observed clustering statistics and external models.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

2 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Only the abstract is available, so the ledger is limited to what is stated. The fit parameters a and b are determined from the data. Halo mass inference relies on an external halo bias model not derived here.

free parameters (2)
  • a = 0.230
    Slope parameter in the bias evolution fit, determined from the four redshift bins.
  • b = 2.394
    Offset parameter in the bias evolution fit, determined from the four redshift bins.
axioms (1)
  • domain assumption Standard LCDM cosmology and halo bias model (e.g., Tinker et al.) accurately maps linear bias to halo mass at z~2-3.5
    Used to interpret the measured bias as constant halo mass ~10^12 M_sun

pith-pipeline@v0.9.1-grok · 6166 in / 1508 out tokens · 50380 ms · 2026-06-26T03:58:10.920824+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

91 extracted references · 39 linked inside Pith

  1. [1]

    Rees,Black Hole Models for Active Galactic Nuclei,Annual Review of Astron and Astrophys22(1984) 471

    M.J. Rees,Black Hole Models for Active Galactic Nuclei,Annual Review of Astron and Astrophys22(1984) 471

    1984

  2. [2]

    Richstone, E.A

    D. Richstone, E.A. Ajhar, R. Bender, G. Bower, A. Dressler, S.M. Faber et al., Supermassive black holes and the evolution of galaxies., Nature385(1998) A14 [astro-ph/9810378]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  3. [3]

    Yu and S

    Q. Yu and S. Tremaine,Observational constraints on growth of massive black holes, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.335(2002) 965 [astro-ph/0203082]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  4. [4]

    Tinker, A.V

    J. Tinker, A.V. Kravtsov, A. Klypin, K. Abazajian, M. Warren, G. Yepes et al.,Toward a halo mass function for precision cosmology: The limits of universality,The Astrophysical Journal688(2008) 709–728

    2008

  5. [5]

    Tinker, B.E

    J.L. Tinker, B.E. Robertson, A.V. Kravtsov, A. Klypin, M.S. Warren, G. Yepes et al.,The large-scale bias of dark matter halos: Numerical calibration and model tests,The Astrophysical Journal724(2010) 878–886

    2010

  6. [6]

    Croom, B.J

    S.M. Croom, B.J. Boyle, T. Shanks, R.J. Smith, L. Miller, P.J. Outram et al.,The 2dF QSO Redshift Survey - XIV. Structure and evolution from the two-point correlation function, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.356(2005) 415 [astro-ph/0409314]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  7. [7]

    Shen, M.A

    Y. Shen, M.A. Strauss, M. Oguri, J.F. Hennawi, X. Fan, G.T. Richards et al.,Clustering of High-Redshift (z≥2.9) Quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey,AJ133(2007) 2222 [astro-ph/0702214]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2007

  8. [8]

    Richardson, Z

    J. Richardson, Z. Zheng, S. Chatterjee, D. Nagai and Y. Shen,The halo occupation distribution of sdss quasars,The Astrophysical Journal755(2012) 30

    2012

  9. [9]

    Eftekharzadeh, A.D

    S. Eftekharzadeh, A.D. Myers and E. Kourkchi,A Halo Occupation Interpretation of Quasars at z∼1.5 Using Very Small-Scale Clustering Information, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.486(2019) 274 [1812.05760]

    arXiv 2019

  10. [10]

    Alam, J.A

    S. Alam, J.A. Peacock, K. Kraljic, A.J. Ross and J. Comparat,Multitracer extension of the halo model: probing quenching and conformity in eboss,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society497(2020) 581–595

    2020

  11. [11]

    S. Yuan, H. Zhang, A.J. Ross, J. Donald-McCann, B. Hadzhiyska, R.H. Wechsler et al., The DESI one-per cent survey: exploring the halo occupation distribution of luminous red galaxies and quasi-stellar objects with ABACUSSUMMIT, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc. 530(2024) 947 [2306.06314]

    arXiv 2024

  12. [12]

    Cole and N

    S. Cole and N. Kaiser,Biased clustering in the cold dark matter cosmogony., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.237(1989) 1127

    1989

  13. [13]

    Martini and D.H

    P. Martini and D.H. Weinberg,Quasar clustering and the lifetime of quasars,The Astrophysical Journal547(2001) 12–26

    2001

  14. [14]

    Haiman and L

    Z. Haiman and L. Hui,Constraining the Lifetime of Quasars from Their Spatial Clustering,ApJ547(2001) 27 [astro-ph/0002190]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2001

  15. [15]

    Osmer,The three-dimensional distribution of quasars in the CTIO surveys,ApJ247 (1981) 762

    P.S. Osmer,The three-dimensional distribution of quasars in the CTIO surveys,ApJ247 (1981) 762

    1981

  16. [16]

    Shanks, R

    T. Shanks, R. Fong, B.J. Boyle and B.A. Peterson,The spatial clustering of QSOs, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.227(1987) 739. – 36 –

    1987

  17. [17]

    Stephens, D.P

    A.W. Stephens, D.P. Schneider, M. Schmidt, J.E. Gunn and D.H. Weinberg,A Study of Quasar Clustering atz >2.7From the Palomar Transit GRISM Survey,AJ114(1997) 41 [astro-ph/9708241]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1997

  18. [18]

    Porciani, M

    C. Porciani, M. Magliocchetti and P. Norberg,Cosmic evolution of quasar clustering: implications for the host haloes,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society355 (2004) 1010–1030

    2004

  19. [19]

    Porciani and P

    C. Porciani and P. Norberg,Luminosity- and redshift-dependent quasar clustering, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society371(2006) 1824–1834

    2006

  20. [20]

    da ˆAngela, T

    J. da ˆAngela, T. Shanks, S.M. Croom, P. Weilbacher, R.J. Brunner, W.J. Couch et al., The 2dF-SDSS LRG and QSO survey: QSO clustering and the L-z degeneracy, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.383(2008) 565 [astro-ph/0612401]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  21. [21]

    N.P. Ross, Y. Shen, M.A. Strauss, D.E. Vanden Berk, A.J. Connolly, G.T. Richards et al., Clustering of Low-redshift (z ¡= 2.2) Quasars from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey,ApJ697 (2009) 1634 [0903.3230]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2009

  22. [22]

    Laurent, S

    P. Laurent, S. Eftekharzadeh, J.-M.L. Goff, A. Myers, E. Burtin, M. White et al., Clustering of quasars in sdss-iv eboss: study of potential systematics and bias determination,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2017(2017) 017–017

    2017

  23. [23]

    White, A.D

    M. White, A.D. Myers, N.P. Ross, D.J. Schlegel, J.F. Hennawi, Y. Shen et al.,The clustering of intermediate-redshift quasars as measured by the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.424(2012) 933 [1203.5306]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2012

  24. [24]

    Eftekharzadeh, A.D

    S. Eftekharzadeh, A.D. Myers, M. White, D.H. Weinberg, D.P. Schneider, Y. Shen et al., Clustering of intermediate redshift quasars using the final SDSS III-BOSS sample, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.453(2015) 2779 [1507.08380]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2015

  25. [25]

    Arita, N

    J. Arita, N. Kashikawa, Y. Matsuoka, W. He, K. Ito, Y. Liang et al.,Subaru High-z Exploration of Low-luminosity Quasars (SHELLQs). XVIII. The Dark Matter Halo Mass of Quasars at z 6,ApJ954(2023) 210 [2307.02531]

    arXiv 2023

  26. [26]

    Kaiser,On the spatial correlations of Abell clusters., Astrophys

    N. Kaiser,On the spatial correlations of Abell clusters., Astrophys. J. Let.284(1984) L9

    1984

  27. [27]

    Bardeen, J.R

    J.M. Bardeen, J.R. Bond, N. Kaiser and A.S. Szalay,The Statistics of Peaks of Gaussian Random Fields,ApJ304(1986) 15

    1986

  28. [28]

    Kauffmann and M

    G. Kauffmann and M. Haehnelt,A unified model for the evolution of galaxies and quasars, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.311(2000) 576 [astro-ph/9906493]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  29. [29]

    Wyithe and A

    J.S.B. Wyithe and A. Loeb,Self-regulated Growth of Supermassive Black Holes in Galaxies as the Origin of the Optical and X-Ray Luminosity Functions of Quasars,ApJ 595(2003) 614 [astro-ph/0304156]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2003

  30. [30]

    Lidz, P.F

    A. Lidz, P.F. Hopkins, T.J. Cox, L. Hernquist and B. Robertson,The Luminosity Dependence of Quasar Clustering,ApJ641(2006) 41 [astro-ph/0507361]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  31. [31]

    Collaboration, A

    D. Collaboration, A. Aghamousa, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, L.E. Allen et al.,The desi experiment part i: Science,targeting, and survey design, 2016

    2016

  32. [32]

    Aghamousa, J

    DESI Collaboration, A. Aghamousa, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, L.E. Allen et al.,The DESI Experiment Part II: Instrument Design,arXiv e-prints(2016) arXiv:1611.00037 [1611.00037]. – 37 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2016

  33. [33]

    Collaboration, B

    D. Collaboration, B. Abareshi, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D.M. Alexander et al., Overview of the instrumentation for the dark energy spectroscopic instrument,The Astronomical Journal164(2022) 207

    2022

  34. [34]

    Adame, J

    A.G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D.M. Alexander, C. Allende Prieto et al., DESI 2024 VII: cosmological constraints from the full-shape modeling of clustering measurements,JCAP2025(2025) 028 [2411.12022]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  35. [35]

    Adame, J

    DESI Collaboration, A.G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D.M. Alexander et al., DESI 2024 III: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from Galaxies and Quasars,arXiv e-prints (2024) arXiv:2404.03000 [2404.03000]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  36. [36]

    Adame, J

    DESI Collaboration, A.G. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D.M. Alexander et al., DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations,arXiv e-prints(2024) arXiv:2404.03002 [2404.03002]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2024

  37. [37]

    Abdul-Karim, J

    DESI Collaboration, M. Abdul-Karim, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, C. Allende Prieto, O. Alves et al.,DESI DR2 Results I: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations from the Lyman Alpha Forest, arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2503.14739 [2503.14739]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  38. [38]

    Adame, J

    A. Adame, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, D. Alexander, M. Alvarez et al.,Desi 2024 iv: Baryon acoustic oscillations from the lyman alpha forest,Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2025(2025) 124

    2024

  39. [39]

    Aghanim, Y

    N. Aghanim, Y. Akrami, M. Ashdown, J. Aumont, C. Baccigalupi, M. Ballardini et al., Planck2018 results: Vi. cosmological parameters,Astronomy % Astrophysics641(2020) A6

    2020

  40. [40]

    Abdul-Karim, A.G

    DESI Collaboration, M. Abdul-Karim, A.G. Adame, D. Aguado, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen et al.,Data Release 1 of the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument,arXiv e-prints(2025) arXiv:2503.14745 [2503.14745]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2025

  41. [41]

    Schlafly, D

    E.F. Schlafly, D. Kirkby, D.J. Schlegel, A.D. Myers, A. Raichoor, K. Dawson et al., Survey Operations for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument,AJ166(2023) 259 [2306.06309]

    arXiv 2023

  42. [42]

    J. Guy, S. Bailey, A. Kremin, S. Alam, D.M. Alexander, C. Allende Prieto et al.,The Spectroscopic Data Processing Pipeline for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument,AJ 165(2023) 144 [2209.14482]

    arXiv 2023

  43. [43]

    Miller, P

    T.N. Miller, P. Doel, G. Gutierrez, R. Besuner, D. Brooks, G. Gallo et al.,The Optical Corrector for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument,AJ168(2024) 95 [2306.06310]

    arXiv 2024

  44. [44]

    Poppett, L

    C. Poppett, L. Tyas, J. Aguilar, C. Bebek, D. Bramall, T. Claybaugh et al.,Overview of the Fiber System for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument,AJ168(2024) 245

    2024

  45. [45]

    Dey, D.J

    A. Dey, D.J. Schlegel, D. Lang, R. Blum, K. Burleigh, X. Fan et al.,Overview of the desi legacy imaging surveys,The Astronomical Journal157(2019) 168

    2019

  46. [46]

    Chaussidon, C

    E. Chaussidon, C. Y` eche, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, D.M. Alexander, J. Yang, S. Ahlen et al.,Target selection and validation of desi quasars,The Astrophysical Journal944 (2023) 107

    2023

  47. [47]

    Y` eche, N

    C. Y` eche, N. Palanque-Delabrouille, C.-A. Claveau, D.D. Brooks, E. Chaussidon, T.M. Davis et al.,Preliminary target selection for the desi quasar (qso) sample,Research Notes of the AAS4(2020) 179. – 38 –

    2020

  48. [48]

    Alexander, T.M

    D.M. Alexander, T.M. Davis, E. Chaussidon, V.A. Fawcett, A. X. Gonzalez-Morales, T.-W. Lan et al.,The DESI Survey Validation: Results from Visual Inspection of the Quasar Survey Spectra,AJ165(2023) 124 [2208.08517]

    arXiv 2023

  49. [49]

    in preparation, (2026)

    Bailey et al. in preparation, (2026)

    2026

  50. [50]

    Busca and C

    N. Busca and C. Balland,Quasarnet: Human-level spectral classification and redshifting with deep neural networks, 2018

    2018

  51. [51]

    J. Farr, A. Font-Ribera and A. Pontzen,Optimal strategies for identifying quasars in desi, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics2020(2020) 015–015

    2020

  52. [52]

    Bianchi and W.J

    D. Bianchi and W.J. Percival,Unbiased clustering estimation in the presence of missing observations, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.472(2017) 1106 [1703.02070]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2017

  53. [53]

    Bianchi, M.M.S

    D. Bianchi, M.M.S. Hanif, A. Carnero Rosell, J. Lasker, A.J. Ross, M. Pinon et al., Characterization of DESI fiber assignment incompleteness effect on 2-point clustering and mitigation methods for DR1 analysis,JCAP2025(2025) 074 [2411.12025]

    arXiv 2025

  54. [54]

    Lasker, A

    J. Lasker, A. Carnero Rosell, A.D. Myers, A.J. Ross, D. Bianchi, M.M.S. Hanif et al., Production of alternate realizations of DESI fiber assignment for unbiased clustering measurement in data and simulations,JCAP2025(2025) 127 [2404.03006]

    arXiv 2025

  55. [55]

    A.J. Ross, J. Aguilar, S. Ahlen, S. Alam, A. Anand, S. Bailey et al.,The construction of large-scale structure catalogs for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument,JCAP2025 (2025) 125 [2405.16593]

    arXiv 2025

  56. [56]

    Myers, J

    A.D. Myers, J. Moustakas, S. Bailey, B.A. Weaver, A.P. Cooper, J.E. Forero-Romero et al.,The Target-selection Pipeline for the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument,AJ 165(2023) 50 [2208.08518]

    arXiv 2023

  57. [57]

    FastSpecFit: Fast spectral synthesis and emission-line fitting of DESI spectra

    J. Moustakas, D. Scholte, B. Dey and A. Khederlarian, “FastSpecFit: Fast spectral synthesis and emission-line fitting of DESI spectra.” Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2308.005, Aug., 2023

    2023

  58. [58]

    Richards, M.A

    G.T. Richards, M.A. Strauss, X. Fan, P.B. Hall, S. Jester, D.P. Schneider et al.,The sloan digital sky survey quasar survey: Quasar luminosity function from data release 3,The Astronomical Journal131(2006) 2766–2787

    2006

  59. [59]

    Peebles,The Large-Scale Structure of the Universe, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA (1980)

    P.J.E. Peebles,The Large-Scale Structure of the Universe, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA (1980)

    1980

  60. [60]

    Landy and A

    S. Landy and A. Szalay,Bias and variance of angular correlation functions,Astrophysical Journal412(1993) 64

    1993

  61. [61]

    Linder,Cosmic growth history and expansion history,Physical Review D72(2005)

    E.V. Linder,Cosmic growth history and expansion history,Physical Review D72(2005)

    2005

  62. [62]

    Sinha and L

    M. Sinha and L. Garrison,Corrfunc: Blazing fast correlation functions with avx512f simd intrinsics, inSoftware Challenges to Exascale Computing, p. 3–20, Springer Singapore (2019), DOI

    2019

  63. [63]

    Sinha and L.H

    M. Sinha and L.H. Garrison,CORRFUNC - a suite of blazing fast correlation functions on the CPU, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.491(2020) 3022

    2020

  64. [64]

    Mohammad and W.J

    F.G. Mohammad and W.J. Percival,Creating jackknife and bootstrap estimates of the covariance matrix for the two-point correlation function,Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society514(2022) 1289–1301. – 39 –

    2022

  65. [65]

    CAMB: Code for Anisotropies in the Microwave Background

    A. Lewis and A. Challinor, “CAMB: Code for Anisotropies in the Microwave Background.” Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1102.026, Feb., 2011

    2011

  66. [66]

    Jing, H.J

    Y.P. Jing, H.J. Mo and G. B¨ orner,Spatial Correlation Function and Pairwise Velocity Dispersion of Galaxies: Cold Dark Matter Models versus the Las Campanas Survey,ApJ 494(1998) 1 [astro-ph/9707106]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1998

  67. [67]

    Peacock and R.E

    J.A. Peacock and R.E. Smith,Halo occupation numbers and galaxy bias, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.318(2000) 1144 [astro-ph/0005010]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2000

  68. [68]

    Berlind and D.H

    A.A. Berlind and D.H. Weinberg,The Halo Occupation Distribution: Toward an Empirical Determination of the Relation between Galaxies and Mass,ApJ575(2002) 587 [astro-ph/0109001]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2002

  69. [69]

    Zheng, A.A

    Z. Zheng, A.A. Berlind, D.H. Weinberg, A.J. Benson, C.M. Baugh, S. Cole et al., Theoretical Models of the Halo Occupation Distribution: Separating Central and Satellite Galaxies,ApJ633(2005) 791 [astro-ph/0408564]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2005

  70. [70]

    Hennawi, M.A

    J.F. Hennawi, M.A. Strauss, M. Oguri, N. Inada, G.T. Richards, B. Pindor et al.,Binary Quasars in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Evidence for Excess Clustering on Small Scales, AJ131(2006) 1 [astro-ph/0504535]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  71. [71]

    Chaussidon, C

    E. Chaussidon, C. Y` eche, A. de Mattia, C. Payerne, P. McDonald, A.J. Ross et al., Constraining primordial non-gaussianity with desi 2024 lrg and qso samples, 2024

    2024

  72. [72]

    Myers, R.J

    A.D. Myers, R.J. Brunner, R.C. Nichol, G.T. Richards, D.P. Schneider and N.A. Bahcall, Clustering analyses of 300,000 photometrically classified quasars. i. luminosity and redshift evolution in quasar bias,The Astrophysical Journal658(2007) 85–98

    2007

  73. [73]

    O. Knox, H. Zhang and P. Behroozi,Trinity vii. predictions for the observable correlation functions of accreting black holes, 2025

    2025

  74. [74]

    Richards, M

    G.T. Richards, M. Lacy, L.J. Storrie-Lombardi, P.B. Hall, S.C. Gallagher, D.C. Hines et al.,Spectral Energy Distributions and Multiwavelength Selection of Type 1 Quasars, ApJS166(2006) 470 [astro-ph/0601558]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  75. [75]

    Mo and S.D.M

    H.J. Mo and S.D.M. White,An analytic model for the spatial clustering of dark matter haloes, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.282(1996) 347 [astro-ph/9512127]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 1996

  76. [76]

    White, P

    M. White, P. Martini and J.D. Cohn,Constraints on the correlation between QSO luminosity and host halo mass from high-redshift quasar clustering, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.390(2008) 1179 [0711.4109]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2008

  77. [77]

    Shankar, D.H

    F. Shankar, D.H. Weinberg and Y. Shen,Constraints on black hole duty cycles and the black hole-halo relation from SDSS quasar clustering, Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc.406 (2010) 1959 [1004.1173]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2010

  78. [78]

    Diemer,COLOSSUS: A Python Toolkit for Cosmology, Large-scale Structure, and Dark Matter Halos,ApJS239(2018) 35 [1712.04512]

    B. Diemer,COLOSSUS: A Python Toolkit for Cosmology, Large-scale Structure, and Dark Matter Halos,ApJS239(2018) 35 [1712.04512]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2018

  79. [79]

    Kollmeier, C.A

    J.A. Kollmeier, C.A. Onken, C.S. Kochanek, A. Gould, D.H. Weinberg, M. Dietrich et al., Black Hole Masses and Eddington Ratios at 0.3 ¡ z ¡ 4,ApJ648(2006) 128 [astro-ph/0508657]

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2006

  80. [80]

    H¨ aring and H.-W

    N. H¨ aring and H.-W. Rix,On the Black Hole Mass-Bulge Mass Relation, Astrophys. J. Let.604(2004) L89 [astro-ph/0402376]. – 40 –

    Pith/arXiv arXiv 2004

Showing first 80 references.